mental health
Mental health services for children and adolescents have been disrupted due to COVID-19

The most systematic study to date of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on mental health suggests that it has caused an additional 53 million cases of major depressive disorder, 76 million cases of anxiety across 204 countries in 2020 alone, according to a new Lancet study. 

The study, published just ahead of World Mental Health Day, which was observed Sunday, found that countries most affected by COVID-19 had the largest increases in the 2 disorders studied, and women and younger people were the most affected. 

The Lancet study was one of several published last week that shed new light on mental health issues around the commemoration of World Mental Health Day, on Sunday. 

It included UNICEF’s State of the World’s Children report, showing that one in seven adolescents aged 10-19  lives with an undiagnosed mental disorder. 

A new WHO Atlas on Mental Health, meanwhile, pointed to the low levels of investments by countries in mental health prevention and treatment  – averaging only 2.1% of national health expenditures, worldwide, and amounting to only US$1 on average, per capita, in least developed countries.

Breaking the silence 

More than 13%, or 1 out of 7 adolescents globally has a mental disorder.

The UNICEF report, the first ever to focus on mental health, called for “breaking the silence around mental health.” 

“[Mental health] is an iceberg we have been ignoring for far too long, and unless we act, it will continue to have disastrous results for children and societies long after the pandemic is over,” UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta H. Fore said, in the report’s Foreword. 

The report underlines the need for a more comprehensive approach to promoting and protecting good mental health for children, including more regular and systematic assessment of mental health indicators as well as the performance of existing mental health services.   

Investment in children’s mental health negligible 

Investment in protection and care for children’s mental health remains negligible, despite widespread demand for action, the UNICEF report stated.

In terms of the broader public, just 52% of countries delivered the targeted mental health promotion and prevention programs—far short of the 80% goal for 2020, according to the new WHO Atlas.

This lack of investments means that health workforces, including community-based workers, are not equipped to properly address mental health across multiple sectors. 

Additional analysis from the UNICEF report indicates that the annual loss in human capital arising from mental health conditions in children aged 0-19 is US $387.2 billion.

The Lancet, UNICEF call for increased mental health investment

The Lancet, in an editorial, echoed UNICEF’s calls for increased government and worldwide investment.

“We urge governments and international organisations to increase their commitment, investments, and actions to prioritise child and adolescent mental health,” the statement read. 

“In addition to expanding the capacity of mental health and psychosocial services to respond to the rise in demand, more investment is needed to promote mental health, especially through parenting programmes and schools.”

Investing in school-based interventions that address anxiety, depression, and suicide provide a return on investment of US $21.50 for every US $1 invested over 80 years. 

“Mental health is a part of physical health – we cannot afford to continue to view it as otherwise,” said Fore. “For far too long, in rich and poor countries alike, we have seen too little understanding and too little investment in a critical element of maximizing every child’s potential. This needs to change.”

Suicide, the fourth leading cause of death for 15 – 19 year olds

Tragically, almost 46,000 children and adolescents between the ages of 10 and 19 end their own lives every year – about 1 every 11 minutes.

 

The cost of how mental disorders impacts human lives is incalculable, with families, schools, and communities deeply affected by suicide – the fourth leading cause of death among 15 – 19 year olds. 

Every year almost 46,000 children and adolescents between the ages of 10 and 19 end their own lives – about 1 every 11 minutes. 

‘Increased Urgency’ in the aftershocks of pandemic 

During the COVID-19 pandemic there has been increased recognition of the importance of mental health

The synergism of the The Lancet study, UNICEF report, and WHO Atlas has shown how the COVID-19 pandemic has created an increased urgency to strengthen mental health care in most countries.

“The risk is that the aftershocks of this pandemic will chip away at the happiness and well-being of children, adolescents and caregivers for years to come – that they will pose a risk to the foundations of mental health,” the UNICEF report reads. 

Image Credits: WHO/NOOR/Sebastian Liste, UNICEF, AMSA/Flickr.

A woman in Africa’s Sahel region shows how her maize corn ears have dried up in a drought, which are occuring with greater frequency in the world’s most food insecure regions as a result of climate change.

A sweeping World Health Organization report on Climate and Health, published just ahead of a critical Glasgow climate conference (COP 26)  that begins 31 October, has declared that “the burning of fossil fuels is killing us” –  the bluntest denunciation to date by the global health agency of societies’ fossil fuel addiction. 

“Climate change is the single biggest health threat facing humanity,” adds the report, whose publication was accompanied by an open appeal to governments, signed by some 300 health organizations representing 45 million health workers worldwide – two-thirds of the global health workforce.  

The “COP26 Special Report on Climate Change and Health” provides little in the way of brand-new data on a much-discussed issue.  But it is the boldest yet of WHO’s recent statements on increasingly alarming trends – leading to more extreme heat episodes, fires, floods, and droughts, and air pollution – which in turn create a cascade of health effects. 

“There are 45 million plus health care professionals who are witnesses to the health emergency that is unfolding in plain sight,” said Howard Catton, CEO of the International Council of Nurses. 

Health professionals, including WHO staff, demonstrate for clean air and climate action outside of the Geneva United Nations headquarters in 2018.

“They see and work with young … and old people struggling with respiratory disorders caused or exacerbated by poor air quality and pollution… people with heatstroke, exhaustion and hypothermia,” said Howard Catton, CEO of the International Council of Nurses, which played a major role in mustering the health community to its appeal for action. 

“They support people who are not coping with extreme temperature changes from heat stroke and exhaustion to hypothermia….

“And they see and experience extreme events and disasters like flooding and forest fires which resulted from spreading infectious diseases, including vector borne diseases, the contamination of food and water that people can’t avoid. 

“They see that the impact is not just on people’s physical health, but on their mental health, depression, anxiety, grief, isolation symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder,” he added.

“The planet has become the patient.” 

An overview of climate-sensitive health risks, their exposure pathways and vulnerability factors.

Reducing climate change could save 5.6 million lives annually from air pollution-related deaths

Despite its harsh tone, the report provides no new estimate for how many lives a year are being lost to climate change directly, said Dr Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum, one of the leaders of the report.  He acknowledged that the most recent WHO study estimated projected deaths from climate change at around 230,000 people a year by the year 2030 – which admittedly only looked at a “small proportion of the ways in climate change affects health.”  Those estimates also omitted a critical issue, the impacts of extreme heat on health – which is increasingly affecting not only older people but also workers in construction, agriculture and other outdoor occupations.  

Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum, Head of WHO Climate Change Unit

Even so, dramatically reducing the burning of fossil fuels, as well as domestic burning of wood and biomass for cooking and heating, would slash deaths from air pollution by 80%, saving some 5.6 million lives a year, said Dr Maria Neira, Director of WHO’s Department of Environment, Climate and Health, which coordinated the report.  

Dr. Maria Neira, Director of WHO Environment, Climate Change and Health

“One of the things that has become very clear in the past few years is this compounding nature of the climate crisis,” added Campbell-Lendrum referring to the synergies. “We have increasing extreme heat also combining with other vulnerability factors. We have urbanizing populations, we have older populations, we have populations living with other previous [health] conditions.”

And while the most heavy health burden from climate change tends falls upon people living in low- and middle-income countries whose homes, food security and livelihoods are more directly impacted by more extreme weather, people in high-income countries are feeling, more and more, the impacts of climate-related drought, fires and flooding, and extreme heat – as evidenced by the wildfires, flooding and heat extremes, seen over the past two years in countries ranging from Australia, to Germany and the United States. 

 … Populations that we thought were relatively immune from climate change, those living in developed countries are in fact much more vulnerable than we thought, including to things like heat stress,” Campbell-Lendrum said. 

Template for Greener COVID Recovery   

The report calls for sustainable, health urban design and transport systems, with improved land-use, access to green and blue public space, and priority for walking, cycling, and public transport.

Billed as a template for action in 10 critical areas – from healthier cities to healthier energy supplies – the report strikes a forward-looking note, citing the solutions available if only sufficient money and political are invested in the climate issue.

The report zeroes into more detail on four key areas of action:  

  • Healthier energy systems; 
  • ‘Reimaginging’ urban environments, transport and mobility – a major source of climate emissions and air pollution in cities;
  • Promoting healthy, sustainable food systems that deliver more nutritious diets with a smaller carbon footprint than current meat- and processed food heavy diets. 
  • Protecting and restoring natural biodiversity, which is essential to the regeneration of   clean water, clean air and food production systems.   

The emphasis, said Neira, should be on the positive benefits that can be generated for people with the right set of climate actions.

“The positive message on the health argument is that whatever you do to tackle the causes of climate change will have enormous benefit for the health of the people,” Neira pointed out – and that argument goes beyond the 5.6 million lives that could be saved from cleaner air. 

“If you do the transformation that is needed in terms of sustainable force food systems, the healthy diets that will result, will prevent as well 5.1 million deaths every year. Plus, all the benefits will come from transport, physical activity. Our society needs to understand that tackling the causes of climate change …probably have a big opportunity,” Neira stressed, adding that whatever investment is spent would be far outweighed by the savings obtained in human lives, productivity and healthcare costs.

Presently, however, as economies around the world continue to pump billions into economic recovery from the COVID pandemic, monies still aren’t being invested into climate-friendly economic stimuli, Campbell-Lendrum pointed out:

“We still see that about 80% of those are investments according to the OECD, are either neutral or harmful for the environment, we have to bring that balance more towards a greener recovery.”

Greening the health sector

The report calls to build climate-resilient and environmentally sustainable health systems and facilities.

The report also calls upon the health sector to start greening its own backyard – by creating more sustainable and climate resilient health facilities.

“If the health sector was a country it would be the fifth largest climate emitter in the world,” declared Neira, referring to the very high carbon footprint of health facilities in most developed countries – second only to the leisure industry in terms of building energy and water demand.

The same facilities are also major generators of plastic and other types of waste from the use of single use health products – often unavoidable. At the same time, facilities in low- and middle-income countries may lack adequate access to electricity and safe water supplies for hygiene and basic health care operations, like maternal and newborn delivery.  Extreme heat in poorly designed and ventilated facilities create huge risks for women in labour, increasing risks of haemorrhage, as well as their newborns – and particularly premature babies – who are more vulnerable to dehydration and lack adequate physiological mechanisms for heat control.

“This report shows that there are ways to limit climate change that can also improve our wellbeing,” said Cheryl Moore, Director of Research Programmes at Wellcome Trust, which has made climate change one of its premier strategic priorities: 

“We’ve spent too long thinking about these issues in isolation; now is the time to focus our efforts on a global, unified strategy to safeguard human health, and that of the planet. It will require all of us working together – now and for the decades to come.”

Image Credits: Commons Wikimedia, Pablo Tosco/Oxfam, WHO, Planetary Health Eastern Africa Hub, WHO/Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Inactivated COVID-19 vaccine candidate produced by Beijing Institute of Biological Products and Sinopharm Group.

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) has recommended that people over the age of 60 who received the Chinese Sinovac and Sinopharm vaccines, should get a third shot – possibly with another vaccine.

“The use of a heterologous platforms vaccine for the additional dose may also be considered based on vaccine supply and access considerations,” according to a preliminary report from last week’s SAGE meeting, an indication that the experts believe that stronger immune responses may be initiated when a different vaccine is used.

“When implementing this recommendation, countries should initially aim at maximizing two-dose coverage in that population, and thereafter administer the third dose, starting in the oldest age groups.”

Scrupulously avoiding calling them boosters, SAGE also recommended that third doses should be offered to “moderately and severely immunocompromised persons” as part of “an extended primary series”.

SAGE also reviewed Bharat Biotech’s COVID-19 Vaccine, Covaxin, and would issue a policy recommendation when the vaccine is Emergency Use Listed (EUL) by WHO – an indication that EUL is close.

SAGE also recommends that all countries consider implementing seasonal influenza vaccination based on the burden of disease, the cost-effectiveness, competing public health priorities, and programmatic feasibility. 

For countries implementing seasonal influenza vaccinations, SAGE recommended prioritising health workers, people with chronic medical conditions, older adults and pregnant women.

 

Image Credits: Sinopharm.

Brazil’s flag draped over a coffin.

Brazil’s official death toll from COVID-19 reached 600,000 late Friday, the second-highest in the world after the US – and a leading epidemiologist blames the Bolsonaro administration for deliberately spreading the virus to achieve “herd immunity”.

“Brazil’s federal government put in place a deliberate policy of exposing the population to the pandemic,” according to Cesar Vitora, Emeritus Professor of Epidemiology at the University of Pelotas and renowned global child health expert.

“In the beginning, we thought they were just incompetent but it was actually deliberate because they tried to reach herd immunity soon so that the economy could go back and start growing. Those 600,000 deaths were not due to incompetence or lack of knowledge but due to deliberate efforts,” he told a meeting last week convened by the Swedish medical university, Karolinska Institutet.

Active dissemination of patients to other states

According to Vitora, instead of isolating people in the Amazon region who had been infected with a new and more potent Gamma (P1) variant, government health officials “actually started sending critically ill patients to all 27 states in the country, an active dissemination strategy, that now is more understandable because that was part of their effort to reach ‘herd immunity’ as a deliberate policy.”

The World Health Organization (WHO) has expressly warned that “herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination, not by exposing them to the pathogen that causes the disease”.

Earlier in the year, human rights researchers from the Conectas Human Rights organisation and the Center for Studies and Research on Health Law (CEPEDISA) at the University of São Paulo also asserted “the existence of an institutional strategy that attempts to spread the virus, promoted by the Brazilian government and spearheaded by the Presidency of the Republic”.

The researchers came to this conclusion by analysing federal government rules and presidential vetoes during the pandemic; “acts of obstruction” to state and municipal government efforts to respond to the pandemic; and “propaganda against public health” aimed at “discrediting health authorities, weakening popular adherence to science-based recommendations, and promoting political activism against the public health measures required to contain the spread of COVID-19”.

The research reveals the “commitment and efficiency of the federal government’s work in favor of the extensive spread of the virus in Brazilian territory, with the stated goal of resuming economic activity as quickly as possible and at any cost”, concluded the researchers headed by Professors Deisy Ventura, Fernando Abujamra Aith and Rossana Reis.

Bolsonaro ‘dereliction of duty’ probe

Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro

They subsequently submitted their research to a parliamentary inquiry into the federal government’s pandemic response which was convened between April and late June, coinciding with the country’s deadliest two COVID-19 waves that averaged 74,000 to 76,000 new cases per day.

The inquiry also probed possible corruption in a $300-million deal in which Bharat Biotech offered to sell its indigenously-made COVID-19 vaccine, Covaxin, to Brazil for a whopping $15 per dose – yet after 18 months, not a single dose had materialised.

In July, after the televised inquiry, Brazil’s top prosecutor said he would request an investigation of President Jair Bolsonaro for dereliction of duty during the process of procuring Covaxin.

Vitora said that Bolsonaro and his officials “minimised the health effects of COVID at first, then they opposed lockdowns and social distancing. They discouraged the use of face masks. They delayed the procurement of vaccines. We were very late to start vaccinating. And they constantly challenged the effectiveness of vaccines. As you well know, the only president in the United Nations General Assembly recently who had not been vaccinated was Bolsonaro.”

Poor Black Brazilians and indigenous people have been particularly badly affected by the pandemic, said Vitora.

While the US has more deaths than Brazil, Brazil’s per capita death toll is considerably higher – 2,847 deaths per million to the US’s 2,162 deaths per million. The nation of over 212,6 million people has officially recorded over 21 million deaths although the figure is likely to be much higher.

A large study that Vitora was involved in that was aimed at assessing the impact of the pandemic in 133 Brazilian cities had to be stopped because the government sent out messages to people on WhatsApp telling them “not allow our interviewers to collect a fingerprint blood sample antibody test”, he added.

Fake cures

Bolsonaro, who has gone through three health ministers in the past 18 months, has promoted ivermectin and hydroychloroquine to treat COVID-19, frequently said that the virus would ‘soon’ pass and also used his veto powers to undermine state governors’ attempts to contain the pandemic through lockdowns and social distancing measures.

“Everything right now is pandemic this, pandemic that. Come on, this has to stop. I am sorry for the dead, I am. We’ll all die one day. There’s no use trying to escape it, to escape reality. We can no longer be a country of sissies, come on,” Bolsanero said in a public address last November.

Last December, 11 former Ministers of Health from different political parties published an article denouncing the “disastrous and inefficient conduct of the Ministry of Health in relation to the Brazilian strategy of vaccinating the population against COVID-19”.

The following month, a supreme court injunction allowed states to vaccinate citizens with approved vaccines and to import vaccines.

Shortly afterwards, Bolsanero said that Pfizer was “tampering with people’s immune systems” and was refusing to take responsibility for side effects, including “if you turn into an alligator… If you become Superman, if some woman is born with a beard, or if a man starts to have a thin voice”.

“Fake news has been a cornerstone of the Bolsanero government’s handling of the pandemic,” said Vitora, stressing that the medical and scientific community had to work out “how to communicate science in a way that it reaches the whole population, counterbalancing, the massive dissemination of fake news by people with bad intentions, who are not interested in science”.

However, Brazil finally seems to be turning the tide on the pandemic, and has vaccinated almost 48% of its population. Meanwhile, Bolsonaro was denied entry to a soccer match over the weekend because he is unvaccinated.

Image Credits: Rafaela Biazi/ Unsplash.

The redistribution of available vaccine doses could avert an estimated one million deaths by mid-2022, found a new MSF report, renewing calls for increased dose redistribution.

The hoarding of more than 870 million excess doses of COVID-19 vaccines in just 10 high-income countries is likely to deprive hundreds of millions of healthcare workers and vulnerable populations in low- and middle-income countries of the opportunity to get even a first vaccine dose, according to a new report by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF).

The report maps doses that will be available until the end of 2021 in the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia and seven other European countries – even after all people age 16 and over were fully vaccinated and third booster doses administered to those at risk. 

The excess doses of COVID-19 vaccines by the end of 2021 after vaccinating people ages 16 and up in ten high-income countries.

Those forecasts of excess doses are conservative – in light of the fact that most high income countries have only reached 70% vaccination coverage of those groups, at best, with vaccine campaigns leveling off after that.  

Based on its analysis, MSF said there is added urgency for high-income countries redistribute excess doses to LMICs, with support for rollout as well. It also repeated previous calls asking pharma companies to prioritize vaccine sales to LMICs.

“If excess COVID-19 vaccine doses are not urgently redistributed, millions of doses could be wasted as they lay idle in HIC storage and are unable to be used before their expiry date.b G7 and EU countries alone could waste 241 million doses by the end of 2021. This would be a tragedy given the urgent need in LMICs,” states the report, published on Thursday.

Timeline critical for dose redistribution – opportunities narrowing fast 

“An additional concern is the timeline for dose redistribution,” the report states. 

“If doses are ‘dumped’ towards the end of the year instead of being steadily redistributed, LMIC health systems may not have the capacity to absorb these doses and they would be wasted, especially if these doses are close to their expiry date. 

This is why it is essential that HICs begin redistributing doses now and commit to clear delivery schedules by the end of October 2021.” 

The report’s authors also stressed that it’s far preferable for  high income countries to redistribute their excess doses through the WHO co-sponsored global COVAX facility – to ensure that doses are redistributed to where there is greatest need and where health systems are able to absorb them. 

This was a message underlined by a COVAX advisory committee recently – saying that bilateral country donations may yield good political capital – but not be as efficient in terms of really getting the doses used effectively. 

Finally, vaccine donations should be accompanied by technical support to actually help LMICs administer the jabs, the report stressed. 

“Not covering these costs will compromise countries’ implementation capacity and therefore the effectiveness of vaccination strategies.”  

World far from WHO’s 40% end-year vaccination goal

The world is currently far from reaching the WHO vaccination targets of vaccinating 40% of the population of all countries by the end of this year and 70% by mid-2022. Some 56 countries failed to meet the goal of reaching 10% vaccination coverage by the end of September. 

In addition, the COVAX Facility has fallen far behind its supply forecast. 

Over 60% of people in high-income countries have received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine, but less than 3% of people in low-income countries have. 

At this stage, healthcare workers and vulnerable people in LMICs will not receive their vaccinations until after the majority of wealthy countries’ populations are fully protected, including with booster shots.

Nearly one million COVID deaths could be averted by dose-sharing

Dose redistribution now is also the fastest way to save lives, said MSF. 

The report estimates that nearly one million COVID deaths could be averted by mid-2022 if available excess doses are redistributed by the end of the year.

“If the world is not urgently vaccinated, it is more likely that ‘variants of concern’ (VOC) will develop and spread globally,” said the MSF report. “The public health, ethical, human rights and economic justifications for ensuring equitable and rapid access to COVID-19 vaccines that can save lives and limit the spread of COVID-19 are clear.”

The doses shared should be suitable, affordable and have sufficient remaining shelf life, MSF added.

Failures of the COVAX Facility

The urgent calls to rich countries for more dose sharing come as the global COVAX vaccine Facility, created with high ambitions to support the development, procurement, and distribution of vaccines, continues to fall far short of its original distribution timeline.

Some fifteen months after the global COVAX was established, the Facility has delivered 230 million doses and is “severely off course” to achieving its goal of delivering two billion doses by the end of 2021, the MSF report noted.  

According to MSF, COVAX failures are related to its “business-as-usual approach,” which allowed pharma companies to decide which countries would be first supplied. 

The inclusion of LMIC governments, regional bodies, and civil society organizations in the design of COVAX would have led to a body more reflective of the needs of LMICs, said MSF. 

As a result, the COVAX model shouldn’t be replicated for future pandemics. Instead regional procurement mechanisms could help regions take better control of their own vaccine manufacturer and supply, the MSF report concluded.

Image Credits: VPalestine/Twitter, WHO PAHO, MSF.

Pandemic lockdowns left billions of people confined to their homes for work and socialization.

Long months of pandemic lockdown have only exacerbated the harms due to alcohol  experienced by billions of people worldwide.  Now, WHO is in the process of developing a new alcohol action plan, in an effort to re-energize a stagnant process and overcome a “lost decade” of little progress on alcohol policies.  Can it make a difference? 

The coronavirus crisis has brought into clear focus how important health is – for people, our families, and our societies at large. We can see that people deeply care about both personal and public health.

At the same time, the pandemic has also made painfully obvious those  public health issues that have been neglected for too long. Billions of people remain unprotected against the harms caused by alcohol – harms also exacerbated as a result of the social and economic distress created by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Since the adoption of the WHO Global Alcohol Strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol more than a decade ago, virtually no progress has been achieved in protecting more people from the harms caused by the products and practices of the alcohol industry.

That is why the WHO process of developing a new global alcohol action plan, 2022-2030, mandated by the WHO Executive Board in February 2022,  matters so much. 

More can and should be done to accelerate action on alcohol harm as public health priority, commensurate with the health, social, and economic burden it causes.

Lost Decade

The last decade has been a lost decade for alcohol policy development. For example,  the global SDG target to reduce per capita alcohol use by 10% by 2030 will not be met according to current forecasts. 

Without action, Africa could see increases in both the absolute number and proportion of people consuming alcohol; amounts consumed per capita, as well as heavy episodic alcohol use. Southeast Asia has seen a 29% increase in per capita alcohol use since 2010. Only the WHO European region has achieved the voluntary target of a 10% reduction of per capita alcohol use – showing that transformative change through proven, high-impact alcohol policy solutions is possible.

However, so far, most countries, especially low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are affected by a heavy alcohol burden, and have NOT implemented a comprehensive set of alcohol policies. 

No low-income country has reported increasing resources for implementing alcohol policy in the last decade. Many countries are failing to implement the alcohol policy best buy solutions, with LMICs more likely to have fewer evidence-based and cost-effective policies.

Few countries use alcohol taxation for health goals 

Few countries impose taxes on alcohol purchases for public health goals.

Few countries use alcohol taxation as a public health policy to prevent and reduce harm and reinvest revenue in health promotion.
 Less than half of countries use price strategies such as adjusting taxes to keep up with inflation and income levels – which means alcohol has become more affordable in many parts of the world over the last decade.

Alcohol has also become more widely available. Less than one-third of countries have regulations on outlet density and days of alcohol sale. 
Some countries, mainly LMICs in Africa, still do not even have a legal minimum purchase age.

And alcohol marketing regulation continues to lag well behind technological innovations and e-commerce that stimulate alcohol consumption, including rapidly developing new delivery systems. Most of the countries that reported no alcohol marketing restrictions whatsoever across all media types were in the African or Americas regions – leaving their children, youth, and adults completely unprotected from the alcohol industry’s push to find ever more loyal consumers.

Alcohol industry profits from lax regulation, heavy consumption, and under-age sales 

Alcohol companies make profits from sales to youths

The alcohol industry profits from the current situation, and has been identified as a major obstacle to progress in promoting health through evidence-based alcohol policy solutions. Their fundamental conflict of interest has never been more clear. The biggest  profits reaped in by  Big Alcohol corporations come from heavy alcohol use. And the alcohol industry is also dependent on under-age alcohol use for their profits.

It is now time to learn the lessons from the current state of global alcohol policy. Country experiences around the world and scientific analysis reveal the strategies of the alcohol industry to misinform the public about the harm of their products, to delay, derail and even destroy alcohol policy development efforts, and to push ever more aggressively for new consumers and markets.

But we also know more about what solutions are effective to protect people and communities better from alcohol harm. Concrete examples show that the alcohol policy best buys hold vast potential to improve health, strengthen health systems, and generate returns on investment.

We know much more now about alcohol’s harms to health

And thirdly, we know much more today than in 2010 about alcohol harms and how to talk about these harms. It is proven that alcohol causes cancer and cardiovascular disease, among 200 other health conditions and diseases. 

And the scientific evidence today is unimpeachable that there is no safe or healthy amount of alcohol consumption, not for the heart, the brain, cancer, or mental health. But now it is important to raise awareness of both the public and policy makers. It is crucial to do away with myths and outdated language that do not reflect reality.

Historic opportunity 

This knowledge, and these insights, are what makes this opportunity historic. Now is the time to make the harm caused by the alcohol industry a public health priority. Now is the time to accelerate alcohol policy action.

For the next decade, the world needs a bold and ambitious new WHO Global Alcohol Action Plan. 

Bigger ambition means to focus more on alcohol policy “Best Buys” and WHO’s SAFER technical package to facilitate country action and impact on alcohol harm. Bolder efforts also mean to pursue targets that really make a difference in the lives and communities of people around the world.

WHO Best Buys for addressing alcohol’s harms

Countries should adopt a target to reduce per capita alcohol use by 2030 with 30%, and to maintain current levels of alcohol abstention. Bigger ambition also means to improve the alcohol policy infrastructure on all levels – learning from other public health priorities. A global ministerial conference on alcohol is needed to foster exchange and leadership, and cross-border collaboration, for instance. An inter-agency joint initiative to support alcohol taxation development is needed to accelerate action on high-impact alcohol policy, improve coordination, and unlock additional resources for alcohol prevention and control.

And bolder efforts also means that more work is needed to support countries in protecting alcohol policy development from alcohol industry interference.

The harm caused by the products and practices of the alcohol industry affects all aspects of our societies. But this also means that alcohol policy action, driven by an ambitious new action plan, has the potential to help improve health and health systems, as well as economic productivity and growth, and social justice and equity.

Developing such an action plan that facilitates comprehensive country action on alcohol harm is a historic opportunity to contribute to creating a world where everyone, everywhere can reach the full potential of a long and healthy life.

___________

Kristina Sperkova, international president of Movendi Int.

Kristina Sperkova is the International President of Movendi International, the world’s largest global social movement for development through alcohol prevention and control, including 130+ member organizations from 50+ countries. Movendi International is in Official Relations with WHO and in Special Consultative Status with the UN ECOSOC.  Ms. Sperkova is also part of the civil society working group on noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) that advises WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

 

Image Credits: Movendi International, Neil Moralee/flickr , Jano Soto Cossio, WHO, Sophie Carroll/flickr, World Health Organization , WHO, 2017 .

Rwanda
Rwandans queue to receive the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine delivered by COVAX in March.

The World Health Organization (WHO) believes that is possible to get 70% of the world vaccinated against COVID-19 by June – but only if wealthy countries redirect their doses and orders to poorer countries that are lagging behind.

Eleven billion vaccines are needed to reach the 70% target, said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus at the launch of the global body’s Strategy to Achieve Global Covid-19 Vaccination by mid-2022.

More than 6.4 billion doses had already been administered globally, and one-third of the world’s population is fully vaccinated against COVID-19,” said Tedros.

“Contracts are in place for the remaining five billion doses, but it’s critical that those go where they are needed most, with priority given to older people, health workers and other at-risk groups,” said Tedros.

“We can only achieve our targets if the countries and companies that control vaccine supply put contracts for COVAX, and the African Vaccine Acquisition Trust (AVAT) first for deliveries, and donated doses.”

Tedros added that there was “horrifying inequity” as high and upper-middle-income countries had used 75% of all vaccines produced so far while low-income countries have received “less than half of 1% of the world’s vaccines”.

Earlier this year, WHO set three global vaccination targets to end the pandemic: 10% of the world’s population vaccinated by the end of September, 40% by December and 70% by next June.

Failed to meet 10% target

But 56 countries, mostly in Africa and the Middle East, failed to meet the 10% target last month. The average vaccination rate in Africa is 4.4%.

However, WHO’s Dr Kate O’Brien, head of vaccines and immunisation, said that around 200 million vaccines were needed for all countries to reach 10% coverage – less than a week’s production, as around 1.5 billion vaccine doses are being produced every month.

Bruce Aylward, Tedros’ special adviser, added that 40% of people were already fully vaccinated in North America, South America and Asia, while the Western Pacific was close to that. 

“Of course, the problem in sub-Saharan Africa,” said Aylward. “There’s enough vaccine in the world, but we have a distribution and delivery problem. If we can’t solve that problem in 12 weeks, that speaks poorly for the urgency we need to end the pandemic.” 

He challenged every country with over 40% coverage, saying that if they were not prioritising helping lower-income unvaccinated parts of the world and COVAX then “they’re simply not doing enough to help achieve global equity”. 

‘Costed, coordinated and credible’

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres

Describing the WHO strategy as a “costed, coordinated and credible path out of the COVID-19 pandemic for everyone, everywhere”, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said that $8-billion was needed to meet the 70% target, both to buy doses and support in-country delivery.  

Guterres expressed frustration that neither the UN nor the WHO had the power to compel wealthy countries or vaccine manufacturers to distribute vaccines fairly.

“I’ve long been pushing for a global vaccination plan to reach everyone everywhere sooner rather than later; a plan that should be implemented by an emergency task force made up of present and potential vaccine production countries, the WHO, COVAX partners, international financial institutions, working with the pharmaceutical companies to guarantee the production of enough doses and their equitable distribution,” said Guterres.

“Unfortunately, I have not been heard. Yet instead of global, coordinated action to get vaccines where they are needed most, we have seen vaccine hoarding, vaccine nationalism and vaccine diplomacy.”

He warned that vaccine inequality is the best ally of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“It’s allowing variants to develop and run wild condemning the world to millions more deaths and prolonging an economic slowdown that could cost trillions of dollars,” said Guterres.

Three steps

The WHO strategy proposes a three-step approach to vaccination, with all older adults, health workers, and high-risk groups of all ages, in every country vaccinated first, followed by the full adult age group in every country and finally adolescents.

It directs all member states to establish updated national COVID-19 vaccine targets and plans that “define dose requirements to guide manufacturing investment and vaccine redistribution”.

It appeals to countries with high vaccine coverage to swap their vaccine deliveries with COVAX and AVAT, accelerate donation commitments, and establish new dose-sharing commitments aimed at reaching the 70% target in every country.

It also calls for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers to prioritize and fulfil COVAX and AVAT contracts, and be transparent about their monthly production.

 “We’ve heard the commitments. We’ve heard the talk. The DG has called for actions, and those are very clear in the strategy,” said O’Brien.

“Countries that have a substantial number of doses already and have achieved high vaccine coverage can swap their place in line for additional doses for the coming weeks and the coming months. The critical feature here is to get the doses to those places that are still lagging behind the target. The second part of this is that funding is needed for those countries to actually deliver the doses.”

Image Credits: WHO.

WTO chief spokesperson Keith Rockwell

Discussions over a controversial World Trade Organization waiver on intellectual property related to COVID vaccines, treatments and other tools, have become more “constructive” said a senior WTO spokesman on Thursday, in a press briefing on the first day of the WTO’s two-day General Council meeting. 

There has been a “subtle shifting in the direction of compromise from both sides,” said WTO chief spokesman Keith Rockwell, holding out hope of a possible agreement on the bitterly disputed initiative in time for the WTO’s big Ministerial Council meeting (MC12), November 30-12 December.

A waiver on intellectual property rights, enshrined in WTO’s TRIPS agreement, was first proposed by South Africa and India last year, as a way to expedite manufacture of desperately-needed COVID health products in lower-income countries that have lacked both capacity to make their own COVID vaccines and therapeutics, as well as purchasing power to acquire patented versions.  

But the initiative has also seen stiff opposition from developed countries, led by Germany and other EU nations, which contend that it could harm, rather than help, fledgling initiatives already underway to expand manufacturing capacity – and locate more of that capacity in low- and middle-income countries. 

The TRIPS waiver initiative is now co-sponsored directly by some 18 low- and middle-income countries along with dozens more nations affiliated with the WTO “African Group” as well as the “Least Developed Country (LDC) Group”.  

Today’s more positive tone at the WTO General Council followed on an announcement by Moderna, one of the world’s two top manufacturers of the newest, and most successful mRNA COVID vaccines, that it would invest in a state-of the-art mRNA vaccine facility in Africa capable of producing up to 500 million doses a year. (see related HPW story). 

In terms of ambition, the Moderna initiative well outpaces that of Pfizer, the world’s other mRNA vaccine powerhouse to jumpstart more vaccine manufacturing on the continent.  In July, Pfizer announced a partnership with South Africa’s Biovac, whereby the South African firm would perform the “fill and finish” for up to 100 million Pfizer vaccines, beginning next year.   

Two-pronged approach in WTO to COVID crisis 

While Rockwell did not cite any concrete points where progress on the waiver talks had been made, he said that the tone of discussions had changed significantly over the past two months. 

“While there is not an agreement on this, and I don’t want to overstate this, or be overly optimistic, I think it’s fair to say that the tone of the discussion was really quite constructive,” Rockwell stated. 

“There were very few highly politically charged interventions; a number of important delegations said that they were ready to look at any proposals that addressed all the concerns –  the issues here are ones with which you’ll be familiar,” Rockwell observed. 

Those issues include high-income countries assertions that IP protections reward innovation, and have been key to the rapid development of COVID vaccines, as well as more specific objections to: “scope of the waiver, including products, and the specific intellectual property elements, considered, and the duration. And the protection of undisclosed information.” 

In its current formulation, the waiver be for an initial period of three years, subject to further review. It would remove not only the existing WTO TRIPS patent protections on COVID health products, but also protections on copyright, trade secrets and other types of IP.   

“Now, I don’t want to oversell this, but the tone was really quite different…” Rockwell said. “I think there is certainly an understanding of how important his issue is, and how short time is for us to be able to come to an agreement.”

Rockwell also stressed that in addition to the highly legalistic negotiations over the IP waiver initiative, New Zealand’s WTO Ambassador, David Walker, is leading a parallel process on so-called “non-TRIPS” interventions that the WTO could take. 

This process, launched in June by General Council Chair Dacio Castillo, of Honduras, puts Walker in charge of finding a “multilateral and horizontal response to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Walker, a former General Council chair himself, has been leading  discussions among members on how other WTO responses, could help facilitate trade in COVID health products and remove export restrictions which slow the international movement of vital goods. 

The process, which is “complimentary” to the TRIPS negotiations, could lead to an outcome document at MC12, Rockwell said, with both “broad political messages” as well as proposal for concrete decisions on WTO rules or regulations that could that includes both political declarations as well as proposals for concrete WTO decisions – to relieve export restrictions; foster greater regulatory coherence; and increase cooperation on issues such as tariffs that may impede access to essential medical products. 

“He [Walker] said that with respect to export restrictions, a large number of members had attached a very high priority to this; they said it’s been disruptive, these export restrictions, to global value chains and have made it difficult to ramp up productions,” Rockwell stated. 

Further work to unlock such bottlenecks could also be part of a “post-MC 12 Work Program, on trade facilitation, regulatory coherence and tariffs.” 

Image Credits: Shutterstock.

Moderna’s clinical development manufacturing facility in the US.

Moderna should work through the Partnership for African Vaccine Manufacturing (PAVM) if it wants to invest in vaccine production on the continent, according to the head of the Africa Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

The company announced on Thursday that it plans to invest $500-million in a “state-of-the-art mRNA facility” in Africa that can produce up to 500 million doses of vaccines each year.

Moderna says that wants the new facility to include drug substance manufacturing, fill and finish and packaging capabilities, but it has neither chosen a country nor committed to a timeline.

Africa CDC Executive Director Dr John Nkengasong said while the announcement was “very much welcome”, he had not seen the company’s media release or been informed about Moderna’s plans. 

Urging the manufacturer to work “very closely” with his organisation, Nkengasong added that the Africa CDC did not “tell manufacturers where to go to produce their vaccines”, but could help to facilitate their plans.

“We have a Partnership for African Vaccine Manufacturing (PAVM), which has a political backing, and our wish and hope is that Moderna works with that group, which looks at vaccine manufacturing in Africa from an ecosystem perspective, from the whole of Africa approach,” Nkengasong told a media briefing on Thursday.

“About 10 countries in Africa have expressed an interest in vaccine manufacturing. We can actually bring them all together and put Moderna at the centre of that to discuss and ask all the questions that will really speak to the need to be transparent, and also to be cooperative and coordinate our efforts,” said Nkengasong.

He stressed that Moderna’s plan would offer relief in the middle- to long-term, but it would not solve Africa’s pressing issues related to COVID-19. These he listed as “quick access to vaccines, redistribution of vaccines, and making sure that certain licences are provided so that manufacturing can start”.

Less than 5% of Africans have been vaccinated against COVID-19, and the continent has been desperately trying to buy vaccines via the African Vaccine Acquisition Trust (AVAT) in the face of massive inequity in access to vaccines.

‘Only the beginning’

Announcing its plans, Stephane Bancel, Moderna’s Chief Executive Officer, said that the company viewed its COVID-19 work as “only just beginning”.

“We are determined to extend Moderna’s societal impact through the investment in a state-of-the-art mRNA manufacturing facility in Africa,” said Bancel.

“While we are still working to increase capacity in our current network to deliver vaccines for the ongoing pandemic in 2022, we believe it is important to invest in the future. We expect to manufacture our COVID-19 vaccine as well as additional products within our mRNA vaccine portfolio at this facility.”

However, there is speculation that part of Moderna’s motivation for making the announcement is because it is under pressure to increase production from the US government, which has invested over $8-billion in its vaccine, according to a report in Politico. 

Some of Moderna’s clients (extract from COVID-19 Vaccine Market Dashboard).

US President Joe Biden has pledged to donate a billion vaccines to low and middle-income countries in a bid to end the COVID-19 pandemic by the end of 2022, and US government officials have reportedly had tense exchanges with Moderna officials about it not scaling up production.

Moderna is also under pressure from health activists as it has almost exclusively supplied high- and middle-income countries with its vaccines via bilateral agreements. According to the COVID-19 vaccines market dashboard compiled by UNICEF, Botswana is the only African country that Moderna has supplied with COVID-19 vaccines.

However, it has undertaken to supply 35 million doses to COVAX in May.

Moderna had not responded to questions by the time of publication.

 

Image Credits: Moderna.

Cuba is seeking WHO approval for its COVID-19 vaccines.

Jamaica, Nicaragua, and Haiti were the only three member countries of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) that failed to meet the World Health Organization (WHO) target of vaccinating 10% of their populations against COVID-19 by the end of September.

Around 37% of people in Latin America and the Caribbean have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19, while seven countries in the Americas have vaccinated more than 70% of their populations, according to PAHO.

While COVID-19 cases are down in the Americas, some local trends across the region remain worrisome, PAHO officials said during a press briefing Wednesday.

The Americas reported a 12% decrease in weekly new cases, according to the newest WHO Weekly Epidemiological Update on COVID-19. 

Worrying local trends

However, local trends paint a different story. Many Southwestern Canadian provinces and the US state of Alaska are reporting their highest hospitalization rates and ICU peaks, with emergency rooms in Alaska overwhelmed with COVID-19.

Chile is also seeing a rise in new cases, especially in urban regions, such as the metropolitan region of Santiago, and in port cities such as Coquimbo and Antofagasta. 

While cases continue to decrease in Central America, Costa Rica and Belize continue to see high rates of hospitalization and ICU peaks. 

In response, PAHO urged governments to remain vigilant on monitoring local COVID-19 trends in their areas.  

“We are reminding governments to keep a close eye on local trends because infection dynamics vary within each country, in part due to differences in vaccine availability and uptake. This small localized approach will be key to keep outbreaks under control,” PAHO Director Carissa Etienne implored.

Vaccine shortages

Although 875,000 vaccine doses have arrived in the region, this is not enough to protect everyone, said Etienne.

“We continue to urge countries with surplus doses to share them with countries in our region, where they can have life-saving impact.” 

PAHO continues to deliver COVAX-funded doses and donations, having already closed agreements with three emergency use listing authorized vaccines – Sinovac, Sinopharm, and AstraZeneca.

Nicaragua has recently announced that the country will receive 7 million doses of Cuban vaccines Abdala, Soberana, and Soberana 2 over the next 3 months.

Cuba had released information back in June regarding the vaccines – its three-dose Abdala vaccine was 92% effective, and its Soberana 2 vaccine is 91% effective when combined with a booster vaccine called Soberana Plus. 

The island’s national regulatory agency approved the Abdala vaccine in July and the Soberana 2 vaccine in August. 

Cuba is currently trying to seek WHO approval for its two home-grown vaccines, which would facilitate their delivery in other countries.  PAHO is supporting Cuba’s participation in the vaccine qualification process.

“Our interest is that all vaccines are able to participate in the WHO process for granting emergency use authorization because this will broaden the supply of vaccines that we are able to purchase through the Revolving Fund,” said PAHO’s Assistant Director Jarbas Barbosa.

For now, PAHO is working with the Nicaraguan government to increase its vaccine access – the country is receiving 223,000 doses from Pfizer starting next week, and an additional 81,900 vaccines from Pfizer are to be received over the rest of the month. 

Nicaragua is receiving other vaccines through COVAX, as well as vaccine donations from Spain. 

 

Image Credits: News Prensa Latina/Twitter.