Eritrea Has Yet to Start COVID-19 Vaccinations as Most African Countries Lag Far Behind Global Targets 09/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Dr Ahmed Ogwell Ouma, Acting Director of the Africa Centres for Disease Control. Eritrea has yet to start vaccinating its citizens against COVID-19, whereas two African countries – South Africa and Tunisia – are now offering citizens over 50 a second COVID-19 booster vaccine. However, but the vaccination rate on the continent is far behind the global vaccination target of 70%. Dr Ahmed Ogwell Ouma, Acting Director of the Africa Centres for Disease Control, told a media briefing on Thursday that only 17.3% of Africans had been vaccinated against the virus, describing it as “very far from our target of 70% that we set last year”. Ten of the 54 member states have vaccinated over 35% of their citizens, with the small island states of the Seychelles (80.6%) and Mauritius (76.5%) leading. They are followed by Rwanda (62.6%), Morocco (61.7%), Botswana (61.3%), Cabo Verde (54.6%), Tunisia (52.7%), Mozambique (43.1%) Sao Tome and Principe (40%) and Lesotho (37.6%). Some 37 of the 54 countries in Africa are offering boosters. Boosters encouraged “We are encouraging our member states to offer booster doses to citizens who have already received their full vaccination coverage, so as to ensure that their immunity remains high and to avoid situations of serious illness amongst those who have been vaccinated,” said Ouma. Some 818 million COVID-19 vaccine doses had been procured by the 54 member states and about 70% of this (579 million) had been administered. In the past month, there has been a 90% surge of cases in east Africa, 36% increase in the Northern region, 35% increase in the Western region and a 12% increase in the Central region. However, there has been a 19% decrease in the Southern region Ethiopia reported a 109% average increase in the number of cases, while Kenya saw a 70% average increase. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), cases increased by 51% and Nigeria saw a 41% increase. However, cases Egypt 60% average decrease South Africa 23% average decrease “This month marks a historic milestone in Africa, the sequencing and sharing of the 100,000th SARS-CoV-2 genome,” Ouma noted, describing this as an example of an advance in science on the continent. Shortage of monkeypox vaccine Monkeypox is endemic in 10 African countries and seven of these and one non-endemic country have reported a total of 1,495 monkeypox cases since the beginning of this year. There have been 66 people deaths, a case fatality rate of 4.4% The vast majority of cases have been recorded in the DRC, with 1284 cases and 58 deaths. Nigeria follows with 66 cases with one death. "Our review shows an escalation of monkeypox cases, especially in the highly endemic DRC, a spread to other countries, and a growing median age from young children to young adults." — Haplogroup News (@HaplogroupNews) June 6, 2022 Cameroon has reported 25 cases and two deaths, the Central African Republic has 17 cases and two deaths, Congo Brazzaville has five cases and three deaths. Liberia (seven cases), Sierra Leone (two cases) and Ghana (one case) have not had any deaths. “Only one non-endemic country in Africa is reporting a case and that is Morocco, which has reported one case, which seems to have a travel history to France during the preceding days,” said Ouma. “Africa CDC has already activated a team within our Emergency Operations Centre, that is following very closely and monitoring the situation on the continent and also globally,” said Ouma. “We have also initiated a One Health approach to this particular intervention by bringing on board all our assets beyond human health in animal health and the environment to be able to get an accurate picture across the continent.” Ouma said that while the smallpox vaccine was effective against monkeypox, Africa had not yet started vaccinations because of a shortage of vaccines. “We are not yet actively vaccinating on the continent due to a lack of vaccine but we recommend the ring vaccination, where we treat those who have been diagnosed and vaccinate the people who are around them,” said Ouma. “In this way, we can be able to interrupt transmission of this virus as quickly as possible and reduce the risks for serious illnesses.” He added that there are “very small stocks of vaccine stockpiles across the world”, and the World Health Organization (WHO) only had a small amount of about 2.4 million doses. “In Africa, we do not yet have any stockpile and we are working with countries to see if there will be need to go beyond isolation and interruption of transmission using non-pharmaceutical methods,” he added. Decomposing Bodies and Contaminated Drinking Water Spark Cholera Fears in Ruined Mariupol 09/06/2022 Raisa Santos Woman boiling water in Mariupol Fears of cholera have emerged in the ruined and Russian-occupied Ukrainian port city of Mariupol. Exiled local officials have voiced concern over the drinking supply in the city, which has been contaminated as a result of decomposing bodies and garbage. “The city has really turned into one with corpses everywhere,” said mayoral aide Petro Andryushchenko on national television. “They are piled. The occupiers cannot cope with burying them even in mass graves. There is not enough capacity even for this.” Andryushchenko said that Russian occupiers of Mariupol are considering quarantining the city in response to the potential outbreaks. “You can enter the city with a residence permit in Mariupol. But this is a one-way ticket, because you cannot leave,” he said. “Of all the possible scenarios to fight the epidemic, in our opinion, Russia has chosen, as always, the most cynical one — just to close the people in the city and leave everything as it is: Whoever survives, survives.” In order to access clean water, Mariupol residents must queue for hours, Andryushchenko said on Telegram, with water available every two days at most. Mariupol mayor Vadym Boychenko has also said last month that due to problems with the water supply, the city may face an infectious catastrophe, and more than 10,000 people may die at the end of the year. Citizens lining up for water in Russian-occupied Mariupol. National authorities monitoring potential outbreaks Ukrainian national authorities have begun monitoring potential cholera outbreaks across the country 1 June, with Ihor Kuzin, Ukraine’s chief sanitary doctor, calling Mariupol’s situation especially dire. “We can’t be 100% sure that there will be disease outbreaks,” he said. “But all prerequisites for them are already there.” In response to growing concern of cholera, WHO Ukraine has “positioned cholera treatment and vaccination supplies in the area,” said WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris in a WHO Ukraine press release Wednesday. The war in #Ukraine raised the risk of infectious diseases. “In #Mariupol, where extensive damage to water systems has mixed water with sewage, we are very concerned about the risk of cholera,” said @WHOUkraine‘s @DrMargaretH. pic.twitter.com/uv06WftqPp — OCHA Ukraine (@OCHA_Ukraine) May 18, 2022 No official reports of cholera to WHO – yet Ibrahima Socé Fall, WHO Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response While the World Health Organization (WHO) has not been able to verify any report of cholera in the southeastern Ukrainian city, following public health risk analysis and needs assessment, officials have said that given the conditions of the city, it is to be expected. “Since the beginning of the attack in Ukraine, we have been highlighting the risk of infectious disease, including cholera, measles, typhoid fever, and other waterborne diseases because of the living conditions,” said Ibrahima Socé Fall, WHO Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response, a press briefing Wednesday. “We haven’t received any report of cholera so far, but that is something we expect.” Last month, WHO said that it was sending cholera medicine to the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro, to prepare for possible outbreaks. WHO officials highlighted the dangerous conditions of Mariupol. “There are swamps, actually, in the streets and the sewage water and drinking water are getting mixed,” said Dorit Nitzan, a regional emergency director at WHO. “This is a huge hazard. It’s a hazard for many infections, including cholera.” Deteriorating water, sanitation, and hygiene infrastructure have heightened risk of cholera, said a report conducted by the WHO’s Health Cluster Ukraine agency in April. The warmer weather of spring and summer can also increase the risk of transmission. “The weather is hot. There are still dead bodies on the streets of the city — especially under the debris of residential buildings. In some blocks, it is impossible to walk by — due to the stench of rotten human flesh. There was no rain for a while, and it is getting hotter,” a resident of Mariupol, who did not want to be named for security concerns, told ABC News. Image Credits: OCHA Ukraine/Twitter, Lesia Vasylenko/Twitter. WHO Experts Emphasize ‘Window of Opportunity’ to Control Monkeypox Spread as Cases Outside Africa Double Again 08/06/2022 Raisa Santos & Elaine Ruth Fletcher WHO Briefing, 8 June Confirmed cases of monkeypox reported to WHO outside of Africa’s endemic zone have doubled once again since last week, 1 June – with more than 1000 cases now having been reported in some 29 countries that don’t usually see the disease. So far, no deaths have been reported in those countries. But some 66 deaths have been recorded among the 1400 cases reported in central and western Africa since the beginning of the year, said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, speaking at a press briefing on Wednesday. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus While WHO is “clearly concerned” about the spread of the disease outside of Africa, Tedros also contrasted the sudden interest in the cases seen abroad with the neglect of the disease in the dozen or so central and western African countries where monkeypox is endemic. “This virus has been circulating and killing in Africa for decades. It’s an unfortunate reflection of the world we live in, that the international community is only now paying attention to monkeypox because it has appeared in high-income countries,” said Tedros. “The communities that live with the threat of this virus everyday deserve the same concern, the same care and the same access to tools to protect themselves.” Still unclear if asymptomatic people can transmit the infection Rosamund Lewis, WHO lead on monkeypox There remains, however, a “window of opportunity to prevent the spread of monkeypox in those who are at highest risk right now,” said WHO’s monkeypox technical lead Rosamund Lewis at the briefing. She noted that most of the cases occurring outside of Africa so far have been among men who have sex with men. “It is possible to control the further onward spread of this outbreak at this time with standard public health control measures, and this includes contact tracing, surveillance, clinical care, and that folks should remain isolated for as long as they are infectious,” she said. However, she also admitted that cases among women are appearing. And there are still many unknowns regarding transmissibility, including potential for asymptomatic transmission of the infection as well as the extent of aerosol (airborne) viral transmission. Gathering data on available vaccines and efficacy The smallpox vaccine protects against monkeypox. WHO is currently assessing the types and quantities of vaccines available globally, as well as the extent to which vaccine manufacturers have capacity to step up their production and deployment – with the aim of developing an equitable distribution plan for available vaccines. Available vaccines include strategic stockpiles of smallpox vaccines, new vaccines targeted against monkeypox, and even vaccines against chickenpox, the experts said. But WHO is not recommending that countries launch campaigns for mass vaccination, Lewis and other experts stressed. Rather, targeted vaccination of the close contacts of infected people, health workers and other caregivers should be the priority for the limited quantities of vaccines that exist today. Sylvie Briand, WHO Director of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention “We have a limited number of cases but they are spread across different geographies. It’s not sending millions of vaccines to one place, but rather a few hundreds of vaccines to many different places in the world,” said Sylvie Briand, WHO Director of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention. Primary driver remains skin to skin contact, other modes of transmission unclear A man shows the rashes on his hands caused by monkeypox. Meanwhile, the primary driver of monkeypox transmission in non-endemic countries appears to be skin-to-skin physical contact, although other modes of transmission are possible too, Lewis said. “Anyone who has the virus in the mouth can also spread that through close face to face contact,” she observed. But she added, “There’s a lot we still don’t know and more research needs to be done in this area. Being mindful, being aware, and being knowledgeable is really important for preventing onward transmission.” Debates over monkeypox travel precautions erupt in the United States While the United States Centers for Disease Control issued and then rescinded recommendations for travelers to employ “enhanced precautions” as a result of the outbreak, WHO has not recommended any measures for the general public. WHO is, however, recommending that family members and health workers looking after or receiving patients with monkeypox or an undiagnosed rash, should wear a mask because of the risks of transmission through virus-laden droplets released in close proximity. “The same applies for persons if they have had lesions in the mouth or on the face that they are able to transmit,” Lewis said, adding that they, too, should wear a mask. There have also been reports of the virus being transmitted to health workers or caregivers via fomites on surfaces such as contaminated bedding or laundry, she said. Regarding the knowns and unknowns of transmission, Lewis concluded: “It’s sometimes useful to think about what precautions can be taken in order to avert any risk of onward spread, and this must be nuanced with what we already know.” WHO will soon be releasing guidance to address how to prevent spread in these groups and settings, including sexual health clinics, emergency rooms, and dermatology clinics, she said. More vaccines may be needed if virus spreads Vaccines for smallpox can be used for monkeypox with a high level of efficacy, as both diseases are in the same family of viruses. Though there are enough vaccines to cover ‘current needs’, WHO anticipates needing more vaccines in the event monkeypox were to spread. “What is really important for us is making sure we prevent further amplification of cases, reducing close contacts so that there is no further spread to communities,” said Briand. Additionally, given the different types of vaccines available, there is currently not a ‘one size fits all’ approach to vaccination. “There’s a lot that is not known about how to best use vaccines,” said Kate O’Brien, WHO Director of Immunization. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) vaccination is recommended for contacts of cases with an appropriate second- or third-generation smallpox or monkeypox vaccine, ideally within four days (and up to 14 days) of first exposure to prevent onset of disease. “Countries are deciding how they will use vaccines, and that data is collected in a way that can inform future vaccine use,” said O’Brien. Ecological factors driving virus spread in Africa Regarding the spread of monkeypox in Africa WHO also pointed to ecological factors, such as climate change, deforestation and reduced biodiversity. “Clearly climate change is an important factor,” said Ibrahima Socé Fall, WHO Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. Deforestation increases the likelihood that zoonoses – diseases present in animals – will make the leap to human populations. As forests are destroyed by loggers, poachers and miners, so are the predators of rodents, squirrels and other animals that may act as a natural reservoir for monkeypox infection. Meanwhile, infected animals also relocate from the wild into human communities – where they are even more likely to transmit the infection to people. The loss of forests and related biodiversity has also played a factor in the emergence of other recent diseases in Africa, including Ebola and Lassa fever, said Socé Fall. “[We need] to make sure that we can continue maintaining biodiversity, but also make sure that communities at the frontline have the knowledge and understanding to protect themselves and prevent the disease from expanding to other countries,” he said. See our related Health Policy Watch story here: https://healthpolicy-watch.news/monkeypox/ Image Credits: WHO. From Davos to Geneva: Taking Hepatitis Seriously 08/06/2022 Finn Jarle Rode Vacccination can effectively prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B – but few children in Africa receive the jab despite high prevalence As the World Hepatitis Summit 2022 takes place this week, some 354 million people are still living with viral hepatitis, despite the fact that vaccines, treatments and even cures are now available, says Finn Jarle Rode is Executive Director at the Hepatitis Fund. Until now, viral hepatitis elimination has been the neglected child of global health. At a glance that may appear an odd statement to make given that both a vaccine and treatment for hepatitis B (HBV) exist. And the 25 years that elapsed between the discovery of the HCV virus in 1989 and that of a cure for hepatitis C in 2014 represents one of the shortest periods of time for such a major R&D effort in infectious disease history. But these scientific breakthroughs are not enough. Today some 354 million people are still living with viral hepatitis, mainly in low and middle-income countries such as India, Bangladesh, China, and Pakistan. People wait to receive free hepatitis testing and treatment in Lahore, Pakistan, at a dedicated Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment Clinic. Only 9% of people living with HBV and 20% of those living with HCV have been tested and diagnosed. Of those diagnosed with HBV infection, 8% are on treatment, while 7% of those diagnosed with HCV infection have started treatment. Globally 1.4 million people are dying from viral hepatitis each year. Before COVID-19, tuberculosis was the world´s biggest infectious disease killer, claiming 1.6 million lives each year. That means that hepatitis has been the world’s third deadliest infectious disease even during the pandemic. Clearly, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) goal to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030 is not going to be reached if the inertia being seen today remains. This, despite the potential benefits of doing so: Every dollar invested in HBV elimination returns up to $2.23. Every dollar invested in HCV returns up to $3.42. A $1.00 vaccine course can prevent one child from getting HBV, and $80.00 can cure someone from HCV. Lack of political will & funding Event at Davos on the margins of the World Economic Forum discussed the still formidable financial and political barriers to viral hepatitis elimination The root cause of the problem is money followed by a lack of political commitment, issues covered in a 25 May panel at Davos held on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum on “Financing Viral Hepatitis Elimination”, including former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark, among other speakers. Today no government clearly leads on the Sustainable Development Goal Target 3.3 of ending communicable diseases including hepatitis. Advocacy and funding are not reaching the critical mass required to realistically end hepatitis. Polio eradication for instance, has been largely driven through the long-standing commitment of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, working in unison with the WHO. We need a similar show of leadership from the philanthropic community to replicate that success with hepatitis. The WHO estimates that only US$500 million is invested in hepatitis elimination per year. Malaria, with a comparable disease burden and lower mortality rates, receives $US3.3 billion per year. The hepatitis response is an unfortunate example of the disconnect between science and policy-making – where tools to effectively end the epidemic are available but decision-makers lack the financial impetus to do so. African region sees highest HBV burden – but newborns aren’t vaccinated Vaccination can effectively prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B In 2019, about 66% of the 1.5 million new HBV infections were concentrated in WHO’s Africa region. The majority of HBV transmission is driven by vertical transmission (from mother to baby). This is the most common and deadliest form of HBV transmission, as approximately 90% of children infected this way develop chronic HBV infection and up to a quarter of these infants also die prematurely from HBV-related causes. The younger a person is when they acquire HBV, the greater chance of chronic infection and premature death. Fortunately, an almost 100% effective vaccine exists to prevent HBV, delivered in a three or four-dose schedule. The first critical dose is known as a “birth dose” and must be delivered within 24 hours of birth (as recommended by WHO) to prevent 70-95% of transmission that occurs during or just after birth. Given the availability of this simple and effective intervention, no child should be born with this life-threatening, chronic disease. But despite the high burden of HBV in the region, only 11 of 47 countries in Africa include hepatitis B birth dose (HepB BD) as part of the routine infant immunization schedule. Only six per cent of African newborns are receiving the birth dose vaccine today. Linking up HIV and HBV services People waiting to receive free hepatitis C tests and vaccines on World Hepatitis Day, Rwanda. But campaigns are no replacement for integration into primary health care services Hepatitis needs big donors to drive bilateral aid and national government buy-in. But this doesn’t have to lead to exorbitant costs. First of all, we need to ensure better integration of viral hepatitis treatment into existing global health programmes, and take a people-centred approach to prevention, diagnosis and treatment. It makes no epidemiological or economic sense, for instance, that an HIV positive pregnant woman in Kenya attending a health care centre be provided with Nevirapine to prevent her infant from contracting HIV, but not also be given access to Tenofovir prophylaxis preventing mother-to-child transmission of HBV in late pregnancy, along with an opportunity to vaccinate her newborn against HBV. Secondly, we need more of the public-private partnerships that have to date proven effective. Much more. And that includes external catalytic funding. We need the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, The Islamic Bank, philanthropists, foundations. Inroads are possible This is not the stuff of fantasy. Inroads are possible, even in the most unlikely scenarios. Take Egypt: it has long held the highest rate of HCV infection in the world. One person out of every 10 used to live with viral hepatitis. But in 2014 the country began implementing a strategy that has made huge progress against the disease. A first step was to get the buy-in of various government ministries, not just the health portfolio. The second was to make the decision to integrate hepatitis C screening with screening for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in primary healthcare facilities. This approach reached some 60 million people, including nine million school children. At the same time, partnerships between civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organisations mobilised communities and drove high rates of screening, diagnosis and treatment. Since the country’s programme began, the number of Egyptians living with hepatitis C has dropped from 4.346 million in 2014 to 516,000 in 2021. Egypt´s remarkable response has shown that the goal of eliminating viral hepatitis is possible. With the right backing, it can be done everywhere. Finn Jarle Rode is Executive Director at the Hepatitis Fund, a global non-profit organization that funds catalytic actions by partners, including support for the development of strategic plans at the national and sub-national level; country-specific data; and health system capacity-strengthening. Image Credits: WHO, PKLI , WHO, WHO. WTO Expresses Optimism Over IP Waiver Agreement But Protestors Call for ‘Real TRIPS Waiver’ 07/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Protestors in New York City. World Trade Organization (WTO) leaders are hopeful that an agreement could be reached on a waiver on intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines at the Ministerial Council starting on Sunday – but the People’s Vaccine Alliance has organised global protests to demand “a real TRIPS waiver” ahead of the meeting. WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has expressed “cautious optimism” that agreement on the IP waiver is possible at the council, according to WTO spokesperson Daniel Pruzin. Speaking at a media briefing on Tuesday following a special meeting of the WTO General Council earlier in the day, Pruzin said that Ambassador Lansana Gberie, chair of the TRIPS Council, which is leading discussions on the waiver and the WTO’s response to the pandemic, was also optimistic. According to Gberie, delegations “entered into real negotiation mode [on Monday] in an effort to try to iron out their differences, particularly with regards to the waiver discussions,” said Pruzin. A small group meeting of the TRIPS Council on the waiver resumed negotiations on Tuesday evening. Too little, too late? On 3 May, Okonjo-Iweala put forward an “outcome document” on the waiver that had emerged from discussions with “the Quad” – the European Union, India, South Africa and the US. According to the WTO, the Quad adopted a “problem-solving approach aimed at identifying practical ways of clarifying, streamlining and simplifying how governments can override patent rights, under certain conditions, to enable diversification of production of COVID-19 vaccines”. However, there are still some sticking points on the proposal, even within the Quad, and the proposal has been widely condemned by health activists for being too little, too late. An IP waiver proposal for all COVID-related technology was first put on the table over 18 months ago by India and South Africa during the height of the pandemic when vaccines were in short supply. The current agreement is confined to COVID-19 vaccines, and it is being negotiated when there is a global glut of vaccines. The People’s Vaccine Alliance is planning global protests during the week aimed at pressuring US and European countries to “end COVID monopolies” and “deliver a real TRIPS waiver”, the global network announced on Tuesday. “The WTO is having its biggest meeting since the start of the pandemic. Feeling the pressure to do something on COVID, WTO leaders have introduced a bogus new proposal that not only fails to remove WTO barriers to COVID medicine accessibility, but actually introduces new obstacles,” according to the alliance. 🇪🇺🇩🇪🇨🇭🇬🇧World leaders, stop protecting Big Pharma and prolonging the global COVID pandemic! Lift Europe's block on a #TRIPSWaiver for COVID vaccines, tests & treatments and #EndCOVIDMonopolies #FightInequality pic.twitter.com/2ZJJsLanBA — #FightInequality (@FightInequality) June 7, 2022 Other big WTO agenda items Other big items on the agenda of the WTO Ministerial Council are a reduction in fishing subsidies, agricultural trade reform and reform of the WTO itself, including more regular ministerial meetings. Pruzin said the “significant progress” had been made on the fishing subsidies proposal, which has been negotiated for a number of years, and on possible ministerial declaration on WTO’s response to the pandemic, “There are still some very important differences which remain in the texts, and I think all the chairs recognise this, be it fisheries, be it agriculture, be in other areas as well,” said Pruzin. “But I think it’s fair to say that the atmosphere is much better than it has been in some time. I think there’s some good momentum going into the final preparations.” Image Credits: People's Vaccine Alliance. Moderna Doses First Participants in Phase 3 Study of mRNA Flu Vaccine 07/06/2022 Maayan Hoffman A medical assistant gives a flu vaccination. Moderna announced Tuesday that the first participants have been vaccinated in a Phase 3 study of its influenza (flu) vaccine, which is based on mRNA technology used in its COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine, mRNA-1010, encodes for hemagglutinin (HA) glycoproteins of the four influenza strains recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the prevention of influenza. Flu epidemics generally occur in the winter and some years can place a heavy burden on healthcare systems, with as many as 3 million to 5 million severe cases and, at its worst, as many as 650,000 deaths, according to WHO. The trial is expected to enroll approximately 6,000 adults in countries in the southern hemisphere. It is a randomized, observer-blind study that is meant to evaluate the safety and immunological efficacy of mRNA-1010 in comparison to a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine in adults 18 years and older. Participants will be randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single dose of mRNA-1010 or a single dose of a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine as a comparator. The company aims to run a confirmatory efficacy study for mRNA-1010 as early as the 2022/2023 northern hemisphere influenza season. “mRNA-1010 is the first of several influenza vaccine candidates we are developing with the aim of iteratively improving traditional vaccines by inducing broad and robust immune responses,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a release. “We believe our mRNA platform, with the flexibility and speed of our manufacturing process, is well-positioned to address the significant unmet need in seasonal flu. Moderna was founded 12 years ago and became well-known two years ago with the development of its SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine. It was the second mRNA vaccine ever to be produced and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The first mRNA vaccine was developed by Pfizer and BioNTech. Moderna is currently engaged in four Phase III studies, it said, including its SARS-CoV-2 booster, RSV, seasonal flu and CMV vaccine candidates. “Beginning in the fall of 2022, the company’s Phase III pipeline could lead to three respiratory commercial launches over the next two to three years,” Bancel said. Image Credits: Moderna, KEYSTONE/Gaetan Bally. ‘Monkeypox Begins – and Must be Resolved in – Endemic Countries’ 06/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, assistant general security for emergency response The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970, yet the viral disease is only getting international attention since it has spread outside Africa to 27 non-endemic countries. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Dr Ebrahima Socé Fall described monkeypox as a “neglected tropical disease” when he opened a two-day meeting called by the WHO’s R&D Blueprint to determine research priorities last Thursday. “We need to stop the chain of transmission and we believe at this stage we can still stop the chain of transmission in non-endemic countries by ensuring surveillance in certain population groups, cross investigation contact tracing, and maybe vaccination,” said Fall, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. However, WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo stressed at the meeting’s conclusion that the viral disease had to be addressed in the nine African countries where it is endemic. “The problem starts and has to be resolved at the level of the endemic countries,” said Restrepo, co-convenor of the R&D Blueprint that called the meeting, at the conclusion of the meeting. “There are researchers of high quality in these countries, and they are doing high-quality research despite the limitations, and our commitment is to support them.” Squirrel pox? The intention of the meeting – attended virtually by over 500 scientists – was to identify research priorities, and when it ended on Friday afternoon, the scientists had identified a long list of unknowns. One of the big questions is whether there is an “unknown animal reservoir” for monkeypox – with squirrels and rats being fingered as the most likely suspects. The Central African sun squirrel is particularly susceptible to monkeypox – and one researcher suggested the pox might have been more aptly named after it. “What was the first reservoir?” asked Dr Paul Fine of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “We think monkey because of the name monkeypox, but there were studies in a number of other species and it was found in several of them, in particular squirrels, particular the sun squirrel of Central Africa. So one might ask if this name is appropriate. Is it just monkeypox or are there other species very importantly, involved as reservoirs?” SARS Co-V2 comes from bats, while monkeypox could come from rats. Professor Jean-Jaques Muyembe Tamfum, director of the DRC’s Institute de Recherche Biomedicale, said that the majority of monkeypox cases in his country were children infected by hunting and handling rodents and squirrels. Adults were exposed to the virus by hunting monkeys. “The virus enters the body through the broken skin, and spreads in the mucous membranes and eyes, nose and the rest,” said Tamfum. Complications of monkeypox include bacterial conjunctivitis and even blindness. Scientists also raised whether rodents could be infected by “spillover” from human waste. The meeting resolved that a “comprehensive One Health approach” was needed to understand animal-to-human transmission and animal reservoirs. A ‘One Health’ approach is neeed for monkeypox Mutations and drivers Genomic sequencing of the current strain of monkeypox spreading internationally shows that it has 47 mutations when compared to a 2018 sample. This is surprisingly high, and one hypothesis is that the monkeypox virus has been mutating in an unknown animal – or perhaps more than one animal behind the two different clades – the Central African clade with a mortality rate of around 10% and the West African clade with a 2-3% fatality rate. Aside from the international spread of monkeypox, there has also been a dramatic increase in cases in endemic countries especially DRC and Nigeria. Nigeria’s Professor Dimie Ogoina told the meeting that his country was also seeing an increase in cases in areas where it had not previously been seen. Scientists thus want to unpack what is driving the transmission, as monkeypox is not known to be particularly infectious. In the past, infected people only passed the virus on to about 8-15% of the people living in the same house. The European outbreaks appear to stem from sexual contact at two events – in Berlin and on the Canary Islands, according to news reports. This is not typically how it has been transmitted, and the meeting raised a number of questions about sexual transmission – particularly whether it can be transmitted via semen and vaginal fluid, not just through contact with the infected lesions. “Monkeypox manifests in rashes. Would a person still engage in sex with these rashes? We need to look at asymptomatic transmission,” said Ogoina. Tricky diagnosis In Nigeria, men are significantly more likely to get monkeypox than women, raising questions about what makes them more vulnerable. Ogoina, from Niger Delta University, also revealed that people coinfected with HIV and monkeypox had “bigger lesions” and were more likely to have genital lesions – although only five such patients were examined. “It is very important just to recognise that the vast majority of recent cases, especially in DRC, are suspected cases or their probable cases or possible cases, they’re not confirmed,” stressed Fine. Some of the symptoms of monkeypox are similar to those of syphilis and chicken pox, and the meeting identified the need for better diagnostics. “WHO, through our regional offices, is working with African countries, regional institutions, technical and financial partners, to increase the ability to support disease surveillance laboratory diagnostics, readiness and response actions related to monkeypox,” said WHO epidemiologist Maria van Kerkhove. “We have to acknowledge the fact that this virus has been circulating for decades, and we now have attention to this. This unfortunately is a sad reality of the world that we live in. But we need to use this as an opportunity to advance our understanding of this virus to help everyone everywhere dealing with monkeypox,” said Van Kerkhove. Implementing COVID lessons Professor Helen Rees Professor Helen Rees, who moderated the two-day meeting, said that COVID-19 had shown the need for rapid global responses to emerging health threats. Rees called for “partnerships, collaboration, strategies that get us into the field quickly, antivirals and vaccines”. “We’re also seeing this interface with One Health, with environmental degradation and climate change. All of these things are coming to the fore. Just to underline this is not a pandemic, this is an outbreak that we are scratching our heads about. But the fact that we should respond now and rapidly is really excellent,” added Rees, a renowned scientist from South Africa’s University of Witwatersrand. WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo concluded the meeting by stressing that it was important to practice what had been preached during COVID-19. “We talked very much about the new health architecture for response to pandemics, and the lessons learned,” said Restrepo. “We are convinced that showing a good response for this multi-country outbreak is our best example of how we are going to be prepared for the next pandemic. “If we do when we all preach, we work together if we collaborate, we use master protocols, if we engage the countries; the communities – if we learn those lessons, and if we put equity at the centre of the discussions, then yes we have learned our lessons and we are moving forward towards being better prepared,” said Restrepo. Ana Maria Restrepo Expedited studies The meeting concluded with experts calling for expedited studies to better understand the disease epidemiology, clinical consequences, and modes of transmission. While the smallpox vaccine offers over 80% against monkeypox, it is unclear whether this protection endures – and smallpox vaccination was discontinued in the 1970s. The experts emphasized the need for clinical studies of vaccines and therapeutics to better document their efficacy and understand how to use them in this and future outbreaks. The meeting also called for immediate implementation of public health activities including communicating prevention information, enhanced disease surveillance, contact tracing, isolation of cases and optimized care of people with the virus. Self-Care Practices Can Save Millions and Alleviate Pressure on Health Systems 06/06/2022 Aishwarya Tendolkar In a world where health workers are scarce, self-care practices can drastically improve people’s quality of life and alleviate strain on health systems, but depend on a range of factors including patient literacy, fair prices and government stewardship. This is according to a one-of-a-kind global study demonstrating the value of self-care that was launched on the sidelines of recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families, and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and to cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider.” Current self-care activities around the world are generating annual savings of approximately $119 billion, along with saving 11 billion patient hours worldwide, according to the study. The study was produced by the Swiss-based Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF), which represents manufacturers and distributors of non-prescription medicines on all continents. Self-care cost-saving (source: Global Self-Care Federation report). Low-income countries lagging But the low-income countries are still lagging in implementing and reaping the benefits of self-care. “In low-income countries, about 65% of households that could not obtain essential health services had financial constraints,” said Dr Ritu Sadana, WHO Head of Ageing and Health Division of Universal Health Coverge (UHC), one of the panelists at the launch of the report. “This is more than triple the proportion of households who lack access to health services because they are just unavailable, which is 20%.” High-income countries are reaping the most benefits of self-care practices while the low-and middle-income countries are playing catch-up. With increased adoption of self-care, we will be seeing an additional $19.5 billion in annual cost savings related to the increased adoption of self-care by 2030, said Ben Carrick, Johnson and Johnson’s senior director of consumer policy. “If we think about the welfare benefits, it could be leading to an annual increase of $312 billion per year globally. These are significant benefits that are worth chasing and grasping,” Carrick told the launch. To estimate the true #ValueofSelfCare, we must first understand how it operates across different global contexts. Our 3 country groupings allow us to unlock such insights. 🌏 Read the report to learn the full scope of benefits that can be achieved:https://t.co/h5gTOOsgUl pic.twitter.com/ZMrINWpIax — The Global Self-Care Federation (@Selfcarefed_org) June 6, 2022 The study grouped 155 countries based on their GDP levels, and then gauged the self-care effects. In the high-income countries (Group A), self-care is already making an indispensable contribution to relieving the burden on healthcare systems. But it is in the low-and middle-income countries (Group B and C), where self-care can enable a person to work and not depend on welfare. “We don’t need more GDP; we need more welfare and this is also what this project is about, this is what self-care is about… to generate more welfare and not just be focused on figures and economic factors,” said Professor Uwe May, Dean of Studies at Fresenius University. He added that currently if people practised self-care instead of doing nothing about their health issues, 41 billion productive days can be gained on a global level. Self-care ‘only option’ in poor countries The study also found that health economic and pharmacoeconomic approaches deployed to assess the value of self-care cannot be transferred to lower-income regions where the infrastructure, socio-economic factors, and awareness is different. In addition, lack of access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and the prevalence of traditional medicines also has an impact on self-care options. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia, self-care is not an alternative care option, but is often “the only possible access to treatment for most individuals”, according to the report. In these countries, self-care does not translate into saving on doctors’ and specialists’ time. “This is where the welfare benefits are really the main opportunity because it isn’t saving physicians’ time and people don’t have access to the physicians,” said Carrick. “But if it means that they’re productive, they’re back at work and they’re able to look after families, then it’s those welfare and productivity benefits that really come into play.”. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the practice of self-care and the use of OTC products leads to current welfare savings of $123 per capita per year. The more the OTC use increases, the greater the individual and societal benefits can be realised through self-care, according to the study “We estimated that at least 142 million older persons, about 14% of older persons worldwide, are unable to meet some of their basic needs. So the issues around self-care for themselves or by their families or care providers is extremely important,” said Carrick. What do we need now? The report highlights the need for private-public partnerships, digital and healthcare literacy in people living in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and better parameters to gauge healthcare outcomes in a country. “We need strong stewardship by government, and to have really strong capacities in government institutions…so that they can lead and shape how we actually get things done with the private sector, with multiple sectors across the government and also obviously, civil society and self-care demands with the active participation of people,” said Sadana. “Health literacy is a fundamental catalyst for change to ensure individuals comprehend and act on credible health information, becoming active self-managers of their own health,” said Carrick. Experts at the launch also highlighted the need for pharmacies to be more involved in developing better policies, and for governments to spend more on ensuring that self-care is delivered through, not only OTC and literacy, but also nutrition, lifestyle, and affordable healthcare. Sadana said that in India, 70% of all healthcare costs are paid out of pocket, and 70% of that was on drugs. “If we’re going to have a system which encourages self-care, using products that are evidence-based and quality-controlled, we still need to have a way to ensure that those are covered [by the health system] if we actually want a vast swathe of the population to use them.” Image Credits: Tbel Abuseridze/ Unsplash. Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Decomposing Bodies and Contaminated Drinking Water Spark Cholera Fears in Ruined Mariupol 09/06/2022 Raisa Santos Woman boiling water in Mariupol Fears of cholera have emerged in the ruined and Russian-occupied Ukrainian port city of Mariupol. Exiled local officials have voiced concern over the drinking supply in the city, which has been contaminated as a result of decomposing bodies and garbage. “The city has really turned into one with corpses everywhere,” said mayoral aide Petro Andryushchenko on national television. “They are piled. The occupiers cannot cope with burying them even in mass graves. There is not enough capacity even for this.” Andryushchenko said that Russian occupiers of Mariupol are considering quarantining the city in response to the potential outbreaks. “You can enter the city with a residence permit in Mariupol. But this is a one-way ticket, because you cannot leave,” he said. “Of all the possible scenarios to fight the epidemic, in our opinion, Russia has chosen, as always, the most cynical one — just to close the people in the city and leave everything as it is: Whoever survives, survives.” In order to access clean water, Mariupol residents must queue for hours, Andryushchenko said on Telegram, with water available every two days at most. Mariupol mayor Vadym Boychenko has also said last month that due to problems with the water supply, the city may face an infectious catastrophe, and more than 10,000 people may die at the end of the year. Citizens lining up for water in Russian-occupied Mariupol. National authorities monitoring potential outbreaks Ukrainian national authorities have begun monitoring potential cholera outbreaks across the country 1 June, with Ihor Kuzin, Ukraine’s chief sanitary doctor, calling Mariupol’s situation especially dire. “We can’t be 100% sure that there will be disease outbreaks,” he said. “But all prerequisites for them are already there.” In response to growing concern of cholera, WHO Ukraine has “positioned cholera treatment and vaccination supplies in the area,” said WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris in a WHO Ukraine press release Wednesday. The war in #Ukraine raised the risk of infectious diseases. “In #Mariupol, where extensive damage to water systems has mixed water with sewage, we are very concerned about the risk of cholera,” said @WHOUkraine‘s @DrMargaretH. pic.twitter.com/uv06WftqPp — OCHA Ukraine (@OCHA_Ukraine) May 18, 2022 No official reports of cholera to WHO – yet Ibrahima Socé Fall, WHO Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response While the World Health Organization (WHO) has not been able to verify any report of cholera in the southeastern Ukrainian city, following public health risk analysis and needs assessment, officials have said that given the conditions of the city, it is to be expected. “Since the beginning of the attack in Ukraine, we have been highlighting the risk of infectious disease, including cholera, measles, typhoid fever, and other waterborne diseases because of the living conditions,” said Ibrahima Socé Fall, WHO Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response, a press briefing Wednesday. “We haven’t received any report of cholera so far, but that is something we expect.” Last month, WHO said that it was sending cholera medicine to the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro, to prepare for possible outbreaks. WHO officials highlighted the dangerous conditions of Mariupol. “There are swamps, actually, in the streets and the sewage water and drinking water are getting mixed,” said Dorit Nitzan, a regional emergency director at WHO. “This is a huge hazard. It’s a hazard for many infections, including cholera.” Deteriorating water, sanitation, and hygiene infrastructure have heightened risk of cholera, said a report conducted by the WHO’s Health Cluster Ukraine agency in April. The warmer weather of spring and summer can also increase the risk of transmission. “The weather is hot. There are still dead bodies on the streets of the city — especially under the debris of residential buildings. In some blocks, it is impossible to walk by — due to the stench of rotten human flesh. There was no rain for a while, and it is getting hotter,” a resident of Mariupol, who did not want to be named for security concerns, told ABC News. Image Credits: OCHA Ukraine/Twitter, Lesia Vasylenko/Twitter. WHO Experts Emphasize ‘Window of Opportunity’ to Control Monkeypox Spread as Cases Outside Africa Double Again 08/06/2022 Raisa Santos & Elaine Ruth Fletcher WHO Briefing, 8 June Confirmed cases of monkeypox reported to WHO outside of Africa’s endemic zone have doubled once again since last week, 1 June – with more than 1000 cases now having been reported in some 29 countries that don’t usually see the disease. So far, no deaths have been reported in those countries. But some 66 deaths have been recorded among the 1400 cases reported in central and western Africa since the beginning of the year, said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, speaking at a press briefing on Wednesday. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus While WHO is “clearly concerned” about the spread of the disease outside of Africa, Tedros also contrasted the sudden interest in the cases seen abroad with the neglect of the disease in the dozen or so central and western African countries where monkeypox is endemic. “This virus has been circulating and killing in Africa for decades. It’s an unfortunate reflection of the world we live in, that the international community is only now paying attention to monkeypox because it has appeared in high-income countries,” said Tedros. “The communities that live with the threat of this virus everyday deserve the same concern, the same care and the same access to tools to protect themselves.” Still unclear if asymptomatic people can transmit the infection Rosamund Lewis, WHO lead on monkeypox There remains, however, a “window of opportunity to prevent the spread of monkeypox in those who are at highest risk right now,” said WHO’s monkeypox technical lead Rosamund Lewis at the briefing. She noted that most of the cases occurring outside of Africa so far have been among men who have sex with men. “It is possible to control the further onward spread of this outbreak at this time with standard public health control measures, and this includes contact tracing, surveillance, clinical care, and that folks should remain isolated for as long as they are infectious,” she said. However, she also admitted that cases among women are appearing. And there are still many unknowns regarding transmissibility, including potential for asymptomatic transmission of the infection as well as the extent of aerosol (airborne) viral transmission. Gathering data on available vaccines and efficacy The smallpox vaccine protects against monkeypox. WHO is currently assessing the types and quantities of vaccines available globally, as well as the extent to which vaccine manufacturers have capacity to step up their production and deployment – with the aim of developing an equitable distribution plan for available vaccines. Available vaccines include strategic stockpiles of smallpox vaccines, new vaccines targeted against monkeypox, and even vaccines against chickenpox, the experts said. But WHO is not recommending that countries launch campaigns for mass vaccination, Lewis and other experts stressed. Rather, targeted vaccination of the close contacts of infected people, health workers and other caregivers should be the priority for the limited quantities of vaccines that exist today. Sylvie Briand, WHO Director of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention “We have a limited number of cases but they are spread across different geographies. It’s not sending millions of vaccines to one place, but rather a few hundreds of vaccines to many different places in the world,” said Sylvie Briand, WHO Director of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention. Primary driver remains skin to skin contact, other modes of transmission unclear A man shows the rashes on his hands caused by monkeypox. Meanwhile, the primary driver of monkeypox transmission in non-endemic countries appears to be skin-to-skin physical contact, although other modes of transmission are possible too, Lewis said. “Anyone who has the virus in the mouth can also spread that through close face to face contact,” she observed. But she added, “There’s a lot we still don’t know and more research needs to be done in this area. Being mindful, being aware, and being knowledgeable is really important for preventing onward transmission.” Debates over monkeypox travel precautions erupt in the United States While the United States Centers for Disease Control issued and then rescinded recommendations for travelers to employ “enhanced precautions” as a result of the outbreak, WHO has not recommended any measures for the general public. WHO is, however, recommending that family members and health workers looking after or receiving patients with monkeypox or an undiagnosed rash, should wear a mask because of the risks of transmission through virus-laden droplets released in close proximity. “The same applies for persons if they have had lesions in the mouth or on the face that they are able to transmit,” Lewis said, adding that they, too, should wear a mask. There have also been reports of the virus being transmitted to health workers or caregivers via fomites on surfaces such as contaminated bedding or laundry, she said. Regarding the knowns and unknowns of transmission, Lewis concluded: “It’s sometimes useful to think about what precautions can be taken in order to avert any risk of onward spread, and this must be nuanced with what we already know.” WHO will soon be releasing guidance to address how to prevent spread in these groups and settings, including sexual health clinics, emergency rooms, and dermatology clinics, she said. More vaccines may be needed if virus spreads Vaccines for smallpox can be used for monkeypox with a high level of efficacy, as both diseases are in the same family of viruses. Though there are enough vaccines to cover ‘current needs’, WHO anticipates needing more vaccines in the event monkeypox were to spread. “What is really important for us is making sure we prevent further amplification of cases, reducing close contacts so that there is no further spread to communities,” said Briand. Additionally, given the different types of vaccines available, there is currently not a ‘one size fits all’ approach to vaccination. “There’s a lot that is not known about how to best use vaccines,” said Kate O’Brien, WHO Director of Immunization. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) vaccination is recommended for contacts of cases with an appropriate second- or third-generation smallpox or monkeypox vaccine, ideally within four days (and up to 14 days) of first exposure to prevent onset of disease. “Countries are deciding how they will use vaccines, and that data is collected in a way that can inform future vaccine use,” said O’Brien. Ecological factors driving virus spread in Africa Regarding the spread of monkeypox in Africa WHO also pointed to ecological factors, such as climate change, deforestation and reduced biodiversity. “Clearly climate change is an important factor,” said Ibrahima Socé Fall, WHO Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. Deforestation increases the likelihood that zoonoses – diseases present in animals – will make the leap to human populations. As forests are destroyed by loggers, poachers and miners, so are the predators of rodents, squirrels and other animals that may act as a natural reservoir for monkeypox infection. Meanwhile, infected animals also relocate from the wild into human communities – where they are even more likely to transmit the infection to people. The loss of forests and related biodiversity has also played a factor in the emergence of other recent diseases in Africa, including Ebola and Lassa fever, said Socé Fall. “[We need] to make sure that we can continue maintaining biodiversity, but also make sure that communities at the frontline have the knowledge and understanding to protect themselves and prevent the disease from expanding to other countries,” he said. See our related Health Policy Watch story here: https://healthpolicy-watch.news/monkeypox/ Image Credits: WHO. From Davos to Geneva: Taking Hepatitis Seriously 08/06/2022 Finn Jarle Rode Vacccination can effectively prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B – but few children in Africa receive the jab despite high prevalence As the World Hepatitis Summit 2022 takes place this week, some 354 million people are still living with viral hepatitis, despite the fact that vaccines, treatments and even cures are now available, says Finn Jarle Rode is Executive Director at the Hepatitis Fund. Until now, viral hepatitis elimination has been the neglected child of global health. At a glance that may appear an odd statement to make given that both a vaccine and treatment for hepatitis B (HBV) exist. And the 25 years that elapsed between the discovery of the HCV virus in 1989 and that of a cure for hepatitis C in 2014 represents one of the shortest periods of time for such a major R&D effort in infectious disease history. But these scientific breakthroughs are not enough. Today some 354 million people are still living with viral hepatitis, mainly in low and middle-income countries such as India, Bangladesh, China, and Pakistan. People wait to receive free hepatitis testing and treatment in Lahore, Pakistan, at a dedicated Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment Clinic. Only 9% of people living with HBV and 20% of those living with HCV have been tested and diagnosed. Of those diagnosed with HBV infection, 8% are on treatment, while 7% of those diagnosed with HCV infection have started treatment. Globally 1.4 million people are dying from viral hepatitis each year. Before COVID-19, tuberculosis was the world´s biggest infectious disease killer, claiming 1.6 million lives each year. That means that hepatitis has been the world’s third deadliest infectious disease even during the pandemic. Clearly, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) goal to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030 is not going to be reached if the inertia being seen today remains. This, despite the potential benefits of doing so: Every dollar invested in HBV elimination returns up to $2.23. Every dollar invested in HCV returns up to $3.42. A $1.00 vaccine course can prevent one child from getting HBV, and $80.00 can cure someone from HCV. Lack of political will & funding Event at Davos on the margins of the World Economic Forum discussed the still formidable financial and political barriers to viral hepatitis elimination The root cause of the problem is money followed by a lack of political commitment, issues covered in a 25 May panel at Davos held on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum on “Financing Viral Hepatitis Elimination”, including former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark, among other speakers. Today no government clearly leads on the Sustainable Development Goal Target 3.3 of ending communicable diseases including hepatitis. Advocacy and funding are not reaching the critical mass required to realistically end hepatitis. Polio eradication for instance, has been largely driven through the long-standing commitment of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, working in unison with the WHO. We need a similar show of leadership from the philanthropic community to replicate that success with hepatitis. The WHO estimates that only US$500 million is invested in hepatitis elimination per year. Malaria, with a comparable disease burden and lower mortality rates, receives $US3.3 billion per year. The hepatitis response is an unfortunate example of the disconnect between science and policy-making – where tools to effectively end the epidemic are available but decision-makers lack the financial impetus to do so. African region sees highest HBV burden – but newborns aren’t vaccinated Vaccination can effectively prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B In 2019, about 66% of the 1.5 million new HBV infections were concentrated in WHO’s Africa region. The majority of HBV transmission is driven by vertical transmission (from mother to baby). This is the most common and deadliest form of HBV transmission, as approximately 90% of children infected this way develop chronic HBV infection and up to a quarter of these infants also die prematurely from HBV-related causes. The younger a person is when they acquire HBV, the greater chance of chronic infection and premature death. Fortunately, an almost 100% effective vaccine exists to prevent HBV, delivered in a three or four-dose schedule. The first critical dose is known as a “birth dose” and must be delivered within 24 hours of birth (as recommended by WHO) to prevent 70-95% of transmission that occurs during or just after birth. Given the availability of this simple and effective intervention, no child should be born with this life-threatening, chronic disease. But despite the high burden of HBV in the region, only 11 of 47 countries in Africa include hepatitis B birth dose (HepB BD) as part of the routine infant immunization schedule. Only six per cent of African newborns are receiving the birth dose vaccine today. Linking up HIV and HBV services People waiting to receive free hepatitis C tests and vaccines on World Hepatitis Day, Rwanda. But campaigns are no replacement for integration into primary health care services Hepatitis needs big donors to drive bilateral aid and national government buy-in. But this doesn’t have to lead to exorbitant costs. First of all, we need to ensure better integration of viral hepatitis treatment into existing global health programmes, and take a people-centred approach to prevention, diagnosis and treatment. It makes no epidemiological or economic sense, for instance, that an HIV positive pregnant woman in Kenya attending a health care centre be provided with Nevirapine to prevent her infant from contracting HIV, but not also be given access to Tenofovir prophylaxis preventing mother-to-child transmission of HBV in late pregnancy, along with an opportunity to vaccinate her newborn against HBV. Secondly, we need more of the public-private partnerships that have to date proven effective. Much more. And that includes external catalytic funding. We need the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, The Islamic Bank, philanthropists, foundations. Inroads are possible This is not the stuff of fantasy. Inroads are possible, even in the most unlikely scenarios. Take Egypt: it has long held the highest rate of HCV infection in the world. One person out of every 10 used to live with viral hepatitis. But in 2014 the country began implementing a strategy that has made huge progress against the disease. A first step was to get the buy-in of various government ministries, not just the health portfolio. The second was to make the decision to integrate hepatitis C screening with screening for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in primary healthcare facilities. This approach reached some 60 million people, including nine million school children. At the same time, partnerships between civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organisations mobilised communities and drove high rates of screening, diagnosis and treatment. Since the country’s programme began, the number of Egyptians living with hepatitis C has dropped from 4.346 million in 2014 to 516,000 in 2021. Egypt´s remarkable response has shown that the goal of eliminating viral hepatitis is possible. With the right backing, it can be done everywhere. Finn Jarle Rode is Executive Director at the Hepatitis Fund, a global non-profit organization that funds catalytic actions by partners, including support for the development of strategic plans at the national and sub-national level; country-specific data; and health system capacity-strengthening. Image Credits: WHO, PKLI , WHO, WHO. WTO Expresses Optimism Over IP Waiver Agreement But Protestors Call for ‘Real TRIPS Waiver’ 07/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Protestors in New York City. World Trade Organization (WTO) leaders are hopeful that an agreement could be reached on a waiver on intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines at the Ministerial Council starting on Sunday – but the People’s Vaccine Alliance has organised global protests to demand “a real TRIPS waiver” ahead of the meeting. WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has expressed “cautious optimism” that agreement on the IP waiver is possible at the council, according to WTO spokesperson Daniel Pruzin. Speaking at a media briefing on Tuesday following a special meeting of the WTO General Council earlier in the day, Pruzin said that Ambassador Lansana Gberie, chair of the TRIPS Council, which is leading discussions on the waiver and the WTO’s response to the pandemic, was also optimistic. According to Gberie, delegations “entered into real negotiation mode [on Monday] in an effort to try to iron out their differences, particularly with regards to the waiver discussions,” said Pruzin. A small group meeting of the TRIPS Council on the waiver resumed negotiations on Tuesday evening. Too little, too late? On 3 May, Okonjo-Iweala put forward an “outcome document” on the waiver that had emerged from discussions with “the Quad” – the European Union, India, South Africa and the US. According to the WTO, the Quad adopted a “problem-solving approach aimed at identifying practical ways of clarifying, streamlining and simplifying how governments can override patent rights, under certain conditions, to enable diversification of production of COVID-19 vaccines”. However, there are still some sticking points on the proposal, even within the Quad, and the proposal has been widely condemned by health activists for being too little, too late. An IP waiver proposal for all COVID-related technology was first put on the table over 18 months ago by India and South Africa during the height of the pandemic when vaccines were in short supply. The current agreement is confined to COVID-19 vaccines, and it is being negotiated when there is a global glut of vaccines. The People’s Vaccine Alliance is planning global protests during the week aimed at pressuring US and European countries to “end COVID monopolies” and “deliver a real TRIPS waiver”, the global network announced on Tuesday. “The WTO is having its biggest meeting since the start of the pandemic. Feeling the pressure to do something on COVID, WTO leaders have introduced a bogus new proposal that not only fails to remove WTO barriers to COVID medicine accessibility, but actually introduces new obstacles,” according to the alliance. 🇪🇺🇩🇪🇨🇭🇬🇧World leaders, stop protecting Big Pharma and prolonging the global COVID pandemic! Lift Europe's block on a #TRIPSWaiver for COVID vaccines, tests & treatments and #EndCOVIDMonopolies #FightInequality pic.twitter.com/2ZJJsLanBA — #FightInequality (@FightInequality) June 7, 2022 Other big WTO agenda items Other big items on the agenda of the WTO Ministerial Council are a reduction in fishing subsidies, agricultural trade reform and reform of the WTO itself, including more regular ministerial meetings. Pruzin said the “significant progress” had been made on the fishing subsidies proposal, which has been negotiated for a number of years, and on possible ministerial declaration on WTO’s response to the pandemic, “There are still some very important differences which remain in the texts, and I think all the chairs recognise this, be it fisheries, be it agriculture, be in other areas as well,” said Pruzin. “But I think it’s fair to say that the atmosphere is much better than it has been in some time. I think there’s some good momentum going into the final preparations.” Image Credits: People's Vaccine Alliance. Moderna Doses First Participants in Phase 3 Study of mRNA Flu Vaccine 07/06/2022 Maayan Hoffman A medical assistant gives a flu vaccination. Moderna announced Tuesday that the first participants have been vaccinated in a Phase 3 study of its influenza (flu) vaccine, which is based on mRNA technology used in its COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine, mRNA-1010, encodes for hemagglutinin (HA) glycoproteins of the four influenza strains recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the prevention of influenza. Flu epidemics generally occur in the winter and some years can place a heavy burden on healthcare systems, with as many as 3 million to 5 million severe cases and, at its worst, as many as 650,000 deaths, according to WHO. The trial is expected to enroll approximately 6,000 adults in countries in the southern hemisphere. It is a randomized, observer-blind study that is meant to evaluate the safety and immunological efficacy of mRNA-1010 in comparison to a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine in adults 18 years and older. Participants will be randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single dose of mRNA-1010 or a single dose of a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine as a comparator. The company aims to run a confirmatory efficacy study for mRNA-1010 as early as the 2022/2023 northern hemisphere influenza season. “mRNA-1010 is the first of several influenza vaccine candidates we are developing with the aim of iteratively improving traditional vaccines by inducing broad and robust immune responses,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a release. “We believe our mRNA platform, with the flexibility and speed of our manufacturing process, is well-positioned to address the significant unmet need in seasonal flu. Moderna was founded 12 years ago and became well-known two years ago with the development of its SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine. It was the second mRNA vaccine ever to be produced and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The first mRNA vaccine was developed by Pfizer and BioNTech. Moderna is currently engaged in four Phase III studies, it said, including its SARS-CoV-2 booster, RSV, seasonal flu and CMV vaccine candidates. “Beginning in the fall of 2022, the company’s Phase III pipeline could lead to three respiratory commercial launches over the next two to three years,” Bancel said. Image Credits: Moderna, KEYSTONE/Gaetan Bally. ‘Monkeypox Begins – and Must be Resolved in – Endemic Countries’ 06/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, assistant general security for emergency response The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970, yet the viral disease is only getting international attention since it has spread outside Africa to 27 non-endemic countries. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Dr Ebrahima Socé Fall described monkeypox as a “neglected tropical disease” when he opened a two-day meeting called by the WHO’s R&D Blueprint to determine research priorities last Thursday. “We need to stop the chain of transmission and we believe at this stage we can still stop the chain of transmission in non-endemic countries by ensuring surveillance in certain population groups, cross investigation contact tracing, and maybe vaccination,” said Fall, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. However, WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo stressed at the meeting’s conclusion that the viral disease had to be addressed in the nine African countries where it is endemic. “The problem starts and has to be resolved at the level of the endemic countries,” said Restrepo, co-convenor of the R&D Blueprint that called the meeting, at the conclusion of the meeting. “There are researchers of high quality in these countries, and they are doing high-quality research despite the limitations, and our commitment is to support them.” Squirrel pox? The intention of the meeting – attended virtually by over 500 scientists – was to identify research priorities, and when it ended on Friday afternoon, the scientists had identified a long list of unknowns. One of the big questions is whether there is an “unknown animal reservoir” for monkeypox – with squirrels and rats being fingered as the most likely suspects. The Central African sun squirrel is particularly susceptible to monkeypox – and one researcher suggested the pox might have been more aptly named after it. “What was the first reservoir?” asked Dr Paul Fine of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “We think monkey because of the name monkeypox, but there were studies in a number of other species and it was found in several of them, in particular squirrels, particular the sun squirrel of Central Africa. So one might ask if this name is appropriate. Is it just monkeypox or are there other species very importantly, involved as reservoirs?” SARS Co-V2 comes from bats, while monkeypox could come from rats. Professor Jean-Jaques Muyembe Tamfum, director of the DRC’s Institute de Recherche Biomedicale, said that the majority of monkeypox cases in his country were children infected by hunting and handling rodents and squirrels. Adults were exposed to the virus by hunting monkeys. “The virus enters the body through the broken skin, and spreads in the mucous membranes and eyes, nose and the rest,” said Tamfum. Complications of monkeypox include bacterial conjunctivitis and even blindness. Scientists also raised whether rodents could be infected by “spillover” from human waste. The meeting resolved that a “comprehensive One Health approach” was needed to understand animal-to-human transmission and animal reservoirs. A ‘One Health’ approach is neeed for monkeypox Mutations and drivers Genomic sequencing of the current strain of monkeypox spreading internationally shows that it has 47 mutations when compared to a 2018 sample. This is surprisingly high, and one hypothesis is that the monkeypox virus has been mutating in an unknown animal – or perhaps more than one animal behind the two different clades – the Central African clade with a mortality rate of around 10% and the West African clade with a 2-3% fatality rate. Aside from the international spread of monkeypox, there has also been a dramatic increase in cases in endemic countries especially DRC and Nigeria. Nigeria’s Professor Dimie Ogoina told the meeting that his country was also seeing an increase in cases in areas where it had not previously been seen. Scientists thus want to unpack what is driving the transmission, as monkeypox is not known to be particularly infectious. In the past, infected people only passed the virus on to about 8-15% of the people living in the same house. The European outbreaks appear to stem from sexual contact at two events – in Berlin and on the Canary Islands, according to news reports. This is not typically how it has been transmitted, and the meeting raised a number of questions about sexual transmission – particularly whether it can be transmitted via semen and vaginal fluid, not just through contact with the infected lesions. “Monkeypox manifests in rashes. Would a person still engage in sex with these rashes? We need to look at asymptomatic transmission,” said Ogoina. Tricky diagnosis In Nigeria, men are significantly more likely to get monkeypox than women, raising questions about what makes them more vulnerable. Ogoina, from Niger Delta University, also revealed that people coinfected with HIV and monkeypox had “bigger lesions” and were more likely to have genital lesions – although only five such patients were examined. “It is very important just to recognise that the vast majority of recent cases, especially in DRC, are suspected cases or their probable cases or possible cases, they’re not confirmed,” stressed Fine. Some of the symptoms of monkeypox are similar to those of syphilis and chicken pox, and the meeting identified the need for better diagnostics. “WHO, through our regional offices, is working with African countries, regional institutions, technical and financial partners, to increase the ability to support disease surveillance laboratory diagnostics, readiness and response actions related to monkeypox,” said WHO epidemiologist Maria van Kerkhove. “We have to acknowledge the fact that this virus has been circulating for decades, and we now have attention to this. This unfortunately is a sad reality of the world that we live in. But we need to use this as an opportunity to advance our understanding of this virus to help everyone everywhere dealing with monkeypox,” said Van Kerkhove. Implementing COVID lessons Professor Helen Rees Professor Helen Rees, who moderated the two-day meeting, said that COVID-19 had shown the need for rapid global responses to emerging health threats. Rees called for “partnerships, collaboration, strategies that get us into the field quickly, antivirals and vaccines”. “We’re also seeing this interface with One Health, with environmental degradation and climate change. All of these things are coming to the fore. Just to underline this is not a pandemic, this is an outbreak that we are scratching our heads about. But the fact that we should respond now and rapidly is really excellent,” added Rees, a renowned scientist from South Africa’s University of Witwatersrand. WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo concluded the meeting by stressing that it was important to practice what had been preached during COVID-19. “We talked very much about the new health architecture for response to pandemics, and the lessons learned,” said Restrepo. “We are convinced that showing a good response for this multi-country outbreak is our best example of how we are going to be prepared for the next pandemic. “If we do when we all preach, we work together if we collaborate, we use master protocols, if we engage the countries; the communities – if we learn those lessons, and if we put equity at the centre of the discussions, then yes we have learned our lessons and we are moving forward towards being better prepared,” said Restrepo. Ana Maria Restrepo Expedited studies The meeting concluded with experts calling for expedited studies to better understand the disease epidemiology, clinical consequences, and modes of transmission. While the smallpox vaccine offers over 80% against monkeypox, it is unclear whether this protection endures – and smallpox vaccination was discontinued in the 1970s. The experts emphasized the need for clinical studies of vaccines and therapeutics to better document their efficacy and understand how to use them in this and future outbreaks. The meeting also called for immediate implementation of public health activities including communicating prevention information, enhanced disease surveillance, contact tracing, isolation of cases and optimized care of people with the virus. Self-Care Practices Can Save Millions and Alleviate Pressure on Health Systems 06/06/2022 Aishwarya Tendolkar In a world where health workers are scarce, self-care practices can drastically improve people’s quality of life and alleviate strain on health systems, but depend on a range of factors including patient literacy, fair prices and government stewardship. This is according to a one-of-a-kind global study demonstrating the value of self-care that was launched on the sidelines of recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families, and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and to cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider.” Current self-care activities around the world are generating annual savings of approximately $119 billion, along with saving 11 billion patient hours worldwide, according to the study. The study was produced by the Swiss-based Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF), which represents manufacturers and distributors of non-prescription medicines on all continents. Self-care cost-saving (source: Global Self-Care Federation report). Low-income countries lagging But the low-income countries are still lagging in implementing and reaping the benefits of self-care. “In low-income countries, about 65% of households that could not obtain essential health services had financial constraints,” said Dr Ritu Sadana, WHO Head of Ageing and Health Division of Universal Health Coverge (UHC), one of the panelists at the launch of the report. “This is more than triple the proportion of households who lack access to health services because they are just unavailable, which is 20%.” High-income countries are reaping the most benefits of self-care practices while the low-and middle-income countries are playing catch-up. With increased adoption of self-care, we will be seeing an additional $19.5 billion in annual cost savings related to the increased adoption of self-care by 2030, said Ben Carrick, Johnson and Johnson’s senior director of consumer policy. “If we think about the welfare benefits, it could be leading to an annual increase of $312 billion per year globally. These are significant benefits that are worth chasing and grasping,” Carrick told the launch. To estimate the true #ValueofSelfCare, we must first understand how it operates across different global contexts. Our 3 country groupings allow us to unlock such insights. 🌏 Read the report to learn the full scope of benefits that can be achieved:https://t.co/h5gTOOsgUl pic.twitter.com/ZMrINWpIax — The Global Self-Care Federation (@Selfcarefed_org) June 6, 2022 The study grouped 155 countries based on their GDP levels, and then gauged the self-care effects. In the high-income countries (Group A), self-care is already making an indispensable contribution to relieving the burden on healthcare systems. But it is in the low-and middle-income countries (Group B and C), where self-care can enable a person to work and not depend on welfare. “We don’t need more GDP; we need more welfare and this is also what this project is about, this is what self-care is about… to generate more welfare and not just be focused on figures and economic factors,” said Professor Uwe May, Dean of Studies at Fresenius University. He added that currently if people practised self-care instead of doing nothing about their health issues, 41 billion productive days can be gained on a global level. Self-care ‘only option’ in poor countries The study also found that health economic and pharmacoeconomic approaches deployed to assess the value of self-care cannot be transferred to lower-income regions where the infrastructure, socio-economic factors, and awareness is different. In addition, lack of access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and the prevalence of traditional medicines also has an impact on self-care options. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia, self-care is not an alternative care option, but is often “the only possible access to treatment for most individuals”, according to the report. In these countries, self-care does not translate into saving on doctors’ and specialists’ time. “This is where the welfare benefits are really the main opportunity because it isn’t saving physicians’ time and people don’t have access to the physicians,” said Carrick. “But if it means that they’re productive, they’re back at work and they’re able to look after families, then it’s those welfare and productivity benefits that really come into play.”. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the practice of self-care and the use of OTC products leads to current welfare savings of $123 per capita per year. The more the OTC use increases, the greater the individual and societal benefits can be realised through self-care, according to the study “We estimated that at least 142 million older persons, about 14% of older persons worldwide, are unable to meet some of their basic needs. So the issues around self-care for themselves or by their families or care providers is extremely important,” said Carrick. What do we need now? The report highlights the need for private-public partnerships, digital and healthcare literacy in people living in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and better parameters to gauge healthcare outcomes in a country. “We need strong stewardship by government, and to have really strong capacities in government institutions…so that they can lead and shape how we actually get things done with the private sector, with multiple sectors across the government and also obviously, civil society and self-care demands with the active participation of people,” said Sadana. “Health literacy is a fundamental catalyst for change to ensure individuals comprehend and act on credible health information, becoming active self-managers of their own health,” said Carrick. Experts at the launch also highlighted the need for pharmacies to be more involved in developing better policies, and for governments to spend more on ensuring that self-care is delivered through, not only OTC and literacy, but also nutrition, lifestyle, and affordable healthcare. Sadana said that in India, 70% of all healthcare costs are paid out of pocket, and 70% of that was on drugs. “If we’re going to have a system which encourages self-care, using products that are evidence-based and quality-controlled, we still need to have a way to ensure that those are covered [by the health system] if we actually want a vast swathe of the population to use them.” Image Credits: Tbel Abuseridze/ Unsplash. Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
WHO Experts Emphasize ‘Window of Opportunity’ to Control Monkeypox Spread as Cases Outside Africa Double Again 08/06/2022 Raisa Santos & Elaine Ruth Fletcher WHO Briefing, 8 June Confirmed cases of monkeypox reported to WHO outside of Africa’s endemic zone have doubled once again since last week, 1 June – with more than 1000 cases now having been reported in some 29 countries that don’t usually see the disease. So far, no deaths have been reported in those countries. But some 66 deaths have been recorded among the 1400 cases reported in central and western Africa since the beginning of the year, said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, speaking at a press briefing on Wednesday. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus While WHO is “clearly concerned” about the spread of the disease outside of Africa, Tedros also contrasted the sudden interest in the cases seen abroad with the neglect of the disease in the dozen or so central and western African countries where monkeypox is endemic. “This virus has been circulating and killing in Africa for decades. It’s an unfortunate reflection of the world we live in, that the international community is only now paying attention to monkeypox because it has appeared in high-income countries,” said Tedros. “The communities that live with the threat of this virus everyday deserve the same concern, the same care and the same access to tools to protect themselves.” Still unclear if asymptomatic people can transmit the infection Rosamund Lewis, WHO lead on monkeypox There remains, however, a “window of opportunity to prevent the spread of monkeypox in those who are at highest risk right now,” said WHO’s monkeypox technical lead Rosamund Lewis at the briefing. She noted that most of the cases occurring outside of Africa so far have been among men who have sex with men. “It is possible to control the further onward spread of this outbreak at this time with standard public health control measures, and this includes contact tracing, surveillance, clinical care, and that folks should remain isolated for as long as they are infectious,” she said. However, she also admitted that cases among women are appearing. And there are still many unknowns regarding transmissibility, including potential for asymptomatic transmission of the infection as well as the extent of aerosol (airborne) viral transmission. Gathering data on available vaccines and efficacy The smallpox vaccine protects against monkeypox. WHO is currently assessing the types and quantities of vaccines available globally, as well as the extent to which vaccine manufacturers have capacity to step up their production and deployment – with the aim of developing an equitable distribution plan for available vaccines. Available vaccines include strategic stockpiles of smallpox vaccines, new vaccines targeted against monkeypox, and even vaccines against chickenpox, the experts said. But WHO is not recommending that countries launch campaigns for mass vaccination, Lewis and other experts stressed. Rather, targeted vaccination of the close contacts of infected people, health workers and other caregivers should be the priority for the limited quantities of vaccines that exist today. Sylvie Briand, WHO Director of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention “We have a limited number of cases but they are spread across different geographies. It’s not sending millions of vaccines to one place, but rather a few hundreds of vaccines to many different places in the world,” said Sylvie Briand, WHO Director of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention. Primary driver remains skin to skin contact, other modes of transmission unclear A man shows the rashes on his hands caused by monkeypox. Meanwhile, the primary driver of monkeypox transmission in non-endemic countries appears to be skin-to-skin physical contact, although other modes of transmission are possible too, Lewis said. “Anyone who has the virus in the mouth can also spread that through close face to face contact,” she observed. But she added, “There’s a lot we still don’t know and more research needs to be done in this area. Being mindful, being aware, and being knowledgeable is really important for preventing onward transmission.” Debates over monkeypox travel precautions erupt in the United States While the United States Centers for Disease Control issued and then rescinded recommendations for travelers to employ “enhanced precautions” as a result of the outbreak, WHO has not recommended any measures for the general public. WHO is, however, recommending that family members and health workers looking after or receiving patients with monkeypox or an undiagnosed rash, should wear a mask because of the risks of transmission through virus-laden droplets released in close proximity. “The same applies for persons if they have had lesions in the mouth or on the face that they are able to transmit,” Lewis said, adding that they, too, should wear a mask. There have also been reports of the virus being transmitted to health workers or caregivers via fomites on surfaces such as contaminated bedding or laundry, she said. Regarding the knowns and unknowns of transmission, Lewis concluded: “It’s sometimes useful to think about what precautions can be taken in order to avert any risk of onward spread, and this must be nuanced with what we already know.” WHO will soon be releasing guidance to address how to prevent spread in these groups and settings, including sexual health clinics, emergency rooms, and dermatology clinics, she said. More vaccines may be needed if virus spreads Vaccines for smallpox can be used for monkeypox with a high level of efficacy, as both diseases are in the same family of viruses. Though there are enough vaccines to cover ‘current needs’, WHO anticipates needing more vaccines in the event monkeypox were to spread. “What is really important for us is making sure we prevent further amplification of cases, reducing close contacts so that there is no further spread to communities,” said Briand. Additionally, given the different types of vaccines available, there is currently not a ‘one size fits all’ approach to vaccination. “There’s a lot that is not known about how to best use vaccines,” said Kate O’Brien, WHO Director of Immunization. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) vaccination is recommended for contacts of cases with an appropriate second- or third-generation smallpox or monkeypox vaccine, ideally within four days (and up to 14 days) of first exposure to prevent onset of disease. “Countries are deciding how they will use vaccines, and that data is collected in a way that can inform future vaccine use,” said O’Brien. Ecological factors driving virus spread in Africa Regarding the spread of monkeypox in Africa WHO also pointed to ecological factors, such as climate change, deforestation and reduced biodiversity. “Clearly climate change is an important factor,” said Ibrahima Socé Fall, WHO Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. Deforestation increases the likelihood that zoonoses – diseases present in animals – will make the leap to human populations. As forests are destroyed by loggers, poachers and miners, so are the predators of rodents, squirrels and other animals that may act as a natural reservoir for monkeypox infection. Meanwhile, infected animals also relocate from the wild into human communities – where they are even more likely to transmit the infection to people. The loss of forests and related biodiversity has also played a factor in the emergence of other recent diseases in Africa, including Ebola and Lassa fever, said Socé Fall. “[We need] to make sure that we can continue maintaining biodiversity, but also make sure that communities at the frontline have the knowledge and understanding to protect themselves and prevent the disease from expanding to other countries,” he said. See our related Health Policy Watch story here: https://healthpolicy-watch.news/monkeypox/ Image Credits: WHO. From Davos to Geneva: Taking Hepatitis Seriously 08/06/2022 Finn Jarle Rode Vacccination can effectively prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B – but few children in Africa receive the jab despite high prevalence As the World Hepatitis Summit 2022 takes place this week, some 354 million people are still living with viral hepatitis, despite the fact that vaccines, treatments and even cures are now available, says Finn Jarle Rode is Executive Director at the Hepatitis Fund. Until now, viral hepatitis elimination has been the neglected child of global health. At a glance that may appear an odd statement to make given that both a vaccine and treatment for hepatitis B (HBV) exist. And the 25 years that elapsed between the discovery of the HCV virus in 1989 and that of a cure for hepatitis C in 2014 represents one of the shortest periods of time for such a major R&D effort in infectious disease history. But these scientific breakthroughs are not enough. Today some 354 million people are still living with viral hepatitis, mainly in low and middle-income countries such as India, Bangladesh, China, and Pakistan. People wait to receive free hepatitis testing and treatment in Lahore, Pakistan, at a dedicated Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment Clinic. Only 9% of people living with HBV and 20% of those living with HCV have been tested and diagnosed. Of those diagnosed with HBV infection, 8% are on treatment, while 7% of those diagnosed with HCV infection have started treatment. Globally 1.4 million people are dying from viral hepatitis each year. Before COVID-19, tuberculosis was the world´s biggest infectious disease killer, claiming 1.6 million lives each year. That means that hepatitis has been the world’s third deadliest infectious disease even during the pandemic. Clearly, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) goal to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030 is not going to be reached if the inertia being seen today remains. This, despite the potential benefits of doing so: Every dollar invested in HBV elimination returns up to $2.23. Every dollar invested in HCV returns up to $3.42. A $1.00 vaccine course can prevent one child from getting HBV, and $80.00 can cure someone from HCV. Lack of political will & funding Event at Davos on the margins of the World Economic Forum discussed the still formidable financial and political barriers to viral hepatitis elimination The root cause of the problem is money followed by a lack of political commitment, issues covered in a 25 May panel at Davos held on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum on “Financing Viral Hepatitis Elimination”, including former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark, among other speakers. Today no government clearly leads on the Sustainable Development Goal Target 3.3 of ending communicable diseases including hepatitis. Advocacy and funding are not reaching the critical mass required to realistically end hepatitis. Polio eradication for instance, has been largely driven through the long-standing commitment of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, working in unison with the WHO. We need a similar show of leadership from the philanthropic community to replicate that success with hepatitis. The WHO estimates that only US$500 million is invested in hepatitis elimination per year. Malaria, with a comparable disease burden and lower mortality rates, receives $US3.3 billion per year. The hepatitis response is an unfortunate example of the disconnect between science and policy-making – where tools to effectively end the epidemic are available but decision-makers lack the financial impetus to do so. African region sees highest HBV burden – but newborns aren’t vaccinated Vaccination can effectively prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B In 2019, about 66% of the 1.5 million new HBV infections were concentrated in WHO’s Africa region. The majority of HBV transmission is driven by vertical transmission (from mother to baby). This is the most common and deadliest form of HBV transmission, as approximately 90% of children infected this way develop chronic HBV infection and up to a quarter of these infants also die prematurely from HBV-related causes. The younger a person is when they acquire HBV, the greater chance of chronic infection and premature death. Fortunately, an almost 100% effective vaccine exists to prevent HBV, delivered in a three or four-dose schedule. The first critical dose is known as a “birth dose” and must be delivered within 24 hours of birth (as recommended by WHO) to prevent 70-95% of transmission that occurs during or just after birth. Given the availability of this simple and effective intervention, no child should be born with this life-threatening, chronic disease. But despite the high burden of HBV in the region, only 11 of 47 countries in Africa include hepatitis B birth dose (HepB BD) as part of the routine infant immunization schedule. Only six per cent of African newborns are receiving the birth dose vaccine today. Linking up HIV and HBV services People waiting to receive free hepatitis C tests and vaccines on World Hepatitis Day, Rwanda. But campaigns are no replacement for integration into primary health care services Hepatitis needs big donors to drive bilateral aid and national government buy-in. But this doesn’t have to lead to exorbitant costs. First of all, we need to ensure better integration of viral hepatitis treatment into existing global health programmes, and take a people-centred approach to prevention, diagnosis and treatment. It makes no epidemiological or economic sense, for instance, that an HIV positive pregnant woman in Kenya attending a health care centre be provided with Nevirapine to prevent her infant from contracting HIV, but not also be given access to Tenofovir prophylaxis preventing mother-to-child transmission of HBV in late pregnancy, along with an opportunity to vaccinate her newborn against HBV. Secondly, we need more of the public-private partnerships that have to date proven effective. Much more. And that includes external catalytic funding. We need the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, The Islamic Bank, philanthropists, foundations. Inroads are possible This is not the stuff of fantasy. Inroads are possible, even in the most unlikely scenarios. Take Egypt: it has long held the highest rate of HCV infection in the world. One person out of every 10 used to live with viral hepatitis. But in 2014 the country began implementing a strategy that has made huge progress against the disease. A first step was to get the buy-in of various government ministries, not just the health portfolio. The second was to make the decision to integrate hepatitis C screening with screening for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in primary healthcare facilities. This approach reached some 60 million people, including nine million school children. At the same time, partnerships between civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organisations mobilised communities and drove high rates of screening, diagnosis and treatment. Since the country’s programme began, the number of Egyptians living with hepatitis C has dropped from 4.346 million in 2014 to 516,000 in 2021. Egypt´s remarkable response has shown that the goal of eliminating viral hepatitis is possible. With the right backing, it can be done everywhere. Finn Jarle Rode is Executive Director at the Hepatitis Fund, a global non-profit organization that funds catalytic actions by partners, including support for the development of strategic plans at the national and sub-national level; country-specific data; and health system capacity-strengthening. Image Credits: WHO, PKLI , WHO, WHO. WTO Expresses Optimism Over IP Waiver Agreement But Protestors Call for ‘Real TRIPS Waiver’ 07/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Protestors in New York City. World Trade Organization (WTO) leaders are hopeful that an agreement could be reached on a waiver on intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines at the Ministerial Council starting on Sunday – but the People’s Vaccine Alliance has organised global protests to demand “a real TRIPS waiver” ahead of the meeting. WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has expressed “cautious optimism” that agreement on the IP waiver is possible at the council, according to WTO spokesperson Daniel Pruzin. Speaking at a media briefing on Tuesday following a special meeting of the WTO General Council earlier in the day, Pruzin said that Ambassador Lansana Gberie, chair of the TRIPS Council, which is leading discussions on the waiver and the WTO’s response to the pandemic, was also optimistic. According to Gberie, delegations “entered into real negotiation mode [on Monday] in an effort to try to iron out their differences, particularly with regards to the waiver discussions,” said Pruzin. A small group meeting of the TRIPS Council on the waiver resumed negotiations on Tuesday evening. Too little, too late? On 3 May, Okonjo-Iweala put forward an “outcome document” on the waiver that had emerged from discussions with “the Quad” – the European Union, India, South Africa and the US. According to the WTO, the Quad adopted a “problem-solving approach aimed at identifying practical ways of clarifying, streamlining and simplifying how governments can override patent rights, under certain conditions, to enable diversification of production of COVID-19 vaccines”. However, there are still some sticking points on the proposal, even within the Quad, and the proposal has been widely condemned by health activists for being too little, too late. An IP waiver proposal for all COVID-related technology was first put on the table over 18 months ago by India and South Africa during the height of the pandemic when vaccines were in short supply. The current agreement is confined to COVID-19 vaccines, and it is being negotiated when there is a global glut of vaccines. The People’s Vaccine Alliance is planning global protests during the week aimed at pressuring US and European countries to “end COVID monopolies” and “deliver a real TRIPS waiver”, the global network announced on Tuesday. “The WTO is having its biggest meeting since the start of the pandemic. Feeling the pressure to do something on COVID, WTO leaders have introduced a bogus new proposal that not only fails to remove WTO barriers to COVID medicine accessibility, but actually introduces new obstacles,” according to the alliance. 🇪🇺🇩🇪🇨🇭🇬🇧World leaders, stop protecting Big Pharma and prolonging the global COVID pandemic! Lift Europe's block on a #TRIPSWaiver for COVID vaccines, tests & treatments and #EndCOVIDMonopolies #FightInequality pic.twitter.com/2ZJJsLanBA — #FightInequality (@FightInequality) June 7, 2022 Other big WTO agenda items Other big items on the agenda of the WTO Ministerial Council are a reduction in fishing subsidies, agricultural trade reform and reform of the WTO itself, including more regular ministerial meetings. Pruzin said the “significant progress” had been made on the fishing subsidies proposal, which has been negotiated for a number of years, and on possible ministerial declaration on WTO’s response to the pandemic, “There are still some very important differences which remain in the texts, and I think all the chairs recognise this, be it fisheries, be it agriculture, be in other areas as well,” said Pruzin. “But I think it’s fair to say that the atmosphere is much better than it has been in some time. I think there’s some good momentum going into the final preparations.” Image Credits: People's Vaccine Alliance. Moderna Doses First Participants in Phase 3 Study of mRNA Flu Vaccine 07/06/2022 Maayan Hoffman A medical assistant gives a flu vaccination. Moderna announced Tuesday that the first participants have been vaccinated in a Phase 3 study of its influenza (flu) vaccine, which is based on mRNA technology used in its COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine, mRNA-1010, encodes for hemagglutinin (HA) glycoproteins of the four influenza strains recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the prevention of influenza. Flu epidemics generally occur in the winter and some years can place a heavy burden on healthcare systems, with as many as 3 million to 5 million severe cases and, at its worst, as many as 650,000 deaths, according to WHO. The trial is expected to enroll approximately 6,000 adults in countries in the southern hemisphere. It is a randomized, observer-blind study that is meant to evaluate the safety and immunological efficacy of mRNA-1010 in comparison to a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine in adults 18 years and older. Participants will be randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single dose of mRNA-1010 or a single dose of a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine as a comparator. The company aims to run a confirmatory efficacy study for mRNA-1010 as early as the 2022/2023 northern hemisphere influenza season. “mRNA-1010 is the first of several influenza vaccine candidates we are developing with the aim of iteratively improving traditional vaccines by inducing broad and robust immune responses,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a release. “We believe our mRNA platform, with the flexibility and speed of our manufacturing process, is well-positioned to address the significant unmet need in seasonal flu. Moderna was founded 12 years ago and became well-known two years ago with the development of its SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine. It was the second mRNA vaccine ever to be produced and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The first mRNA vaccine was developed by Pfizer and BioNTech. Moderna is currently engaged in four Phase III studies, it said, including its SARS-CoV-2 booster, RSV, seasonal flu and CMV vaccine candidates. “Beginning in the fall of 2022, the company’s Phase III pipeline could lead to three respiratory commercial launches over the next two to three years,” Bancel said. Image Credits: Moderna, KEYSTONE/Gaetan Bally. ‘Monkeypox Begins – and Must be Resolved in – Endemic Countries’ 06/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, assistant general security for emergency response The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970, yet the viral disease is only getting international attention since it has spread outside Africa to 27 non-endemic countries. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Dr Ebrahima Socé Fall described monkeypox as a “neglected tropical disease” when he opened a two-day meeting called by the WHO’s R&D Blueprint to determine research priorities last Thursday. “We need to stop the chain of transmission and we believe at this stage we can still stop the chain of transmission in non-endemic countries by ensuring surveillance in certain population groups, cross investigation contact tracing, and maybe vaccination,” said Fall, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. However, WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo stressed at the meeting’s conclusion that the viral disease had to be addressed in the nine African countries where it is endemic. “The problem starts and has to be resolved at the level of the endemic countries,” said Restrepo, co-convenor of the R&D Blueprint that called the meeting, at the conclusion of the meeting. “There are researchers of high quality in these countries, and they are doing high-quality research despite the limitations, and our commitment is to support them.” Squirrel pox? The intention of the meeting – attended virtually by over 500 scientists – was to identify research priorities, and when it ended on Friday afternoon, the scientists had identified a long list of unknowns. One of the big questions is whether there is an “unknown animal reservoir” for monkeypox – with squirrels and rats being fingered as the most likely suspects. The Central African sun squirrel is particularly susceptible to monkeypox – and one researcher suggested the pox might have been more aptly named after it. “What was the first reservoir?” asked Dr Paul Fine of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “We think monkey because of the name monkeypox, but there were studies in a number of other species and it was found in several of them, in particular squirrels, particular the sun squirrel of Central Africa. So one might ask if this name is appropriate. Is it just monkeypox or are there other species very importantly, involved as reservoirs?” SARS Co-V2 comes from bats, while monkeypox could come from rats. Professor Jean-Jaques Muyembe Tamfum, director of the DRC’s Institute de Recherche Biomedicale, said that the majority of monkeypox cases in his country were children infected by hunting and handling rodents and squirrels. Adults were exposed to the virus by hunting monkeys. “The virus enters the body through the broken skin, and spreads in the mucous membranes and eyes, nose and the rest,” said Tamfum. Complications of monkeypox include bacterial conjunctivitis and even blindness. Scientists also raised whether rodents could be infected by “spillover” from human waste. The meeting resolved that a “comprehensive One Health approach” was needed to understand animal-to-human transmission and animal reservoirs. A ‘One Health’ approach is neeed for monkeypox Mutations and drivers Genomic sequencing of the current strain of monkeypox spreading internationally shows that it has 47 mutations when compared to a 2018 sample. This is surprisingly high, and one hypothesis is that the monkeypox virus has been mutating in an unknown animal – or perhaps more than one animal behind the two different clades – the Central African clade with a mortality rate of around 10% and the West African clade with a 2-3% fatality rate. Aside from the international spread of monkeypox, there has also been a dramatic increase in cases in endemic countries especially DRC and Nigeria. Nigeria’s Professor Dimie Ogoina told the meeting that his country was also seeing an increase in cases in areas where it had not previously been seen. Scientists thus want to unpack what is driving the transmission, as monkeypox is not known to be particularly infectious. In the past, infected people only passed the virus on to about 8-15% of the people living in the same house. The European outbreaks appear to stem from sexual contact at two events – in Berlin and on the Canary Islands, according to news reports. This is not typically how it has been transmitted, and the meeting raised a number of questions about sexual transmission – particularly whether it can be transmitted via semen and vaginal fluid, not just through contact with the infected lesions. “Monkeypox manifests in rashes. Would a person still engage in sex with these rashes? We need to look at asymptomatic transmission,” said Ogoina. Tricky diagnosis In Nigeria, men are significantly more likely to get monkeypox than women, raising questions about what makes them more vulnerable. Ogoina, from Niger Delta University, also revealed that people coinfected with HIV and monkeypox had “bigger lesions” and were more likely to have genital lesions – although only five such patients were examined. “It is very important just to recognise that the vast majority of recent cases, especially in DRC, are suspected cases or their probable cases or possible cases, they’re not confirmed,” stressed Fine. Some of the symptoms of monkeypox are similar to those of syphilis and chicken pox, and the meeting identified the need for better diagnostics. “WHO, through our regional offices, is working with African countries, regional institutions, technical and financial partners, to increase the ability to support disease surveillance laboratory diagnostics, readiness and response actions related to monkeypox,” said WHO epidemiologist Maria van Kerkhove. “We have to acknowledge the fact that this virus has been circulating for decades, and we now have attention to this. This unfortunately is a sad reality of the world that we live in. But we need to use this as an opportunity to advance our understanding of this virus to help everyone everywhere dealing with monkeypox,” said Van Kerkhove. Implementing COVID lessons Professor Helen Rees Professor Helen Rees, who moderated the two-day meeting, said that COVID-19 had shown the need for rapid global responses to emerging health threats. Rees called for “partnerships, collaboration, strategies that get us into the field quickly, antivirals and vaccines”. “We’re also seeing this interface with One Health, with environmental degradation and climate change. All of these things are coming to the fore. Just to underline this is not a pandemic, this is an outbreak that we are scratching our heads about. But the fact that we should respond now and rapidly is really excellent,” added Rees, a renowned scientist from South Africa’s University of Witwatersrand. WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo concluded the meeting by stressing that it was important to practice what had been preached during COVID-19. “We talked very much about the new health architecture for response to pandemics, and the lessons learned,” said Restrepo. “We are convinced that showing a good response for this multi-country outbreak is our best example of how we are going to be prepared for the next pandemic. “If we do when we all preach, we work together if we collaborate, we use master protocols, if we engage the countries; the communities – if we learn those lessons, and if we put equity at the centre of the discussions, then yes we have learned our lessons and we are moving forward towards being better prepared,” said Restrepo. Ana Maria Restrepo Expedited studies The meeting concluded with experts calling for expedited studies to better understand the disease epidemiology, clinical consequences, and modes of transmission. While the smallpox vaccine offers over 80% against monkeypox, it is unclear whether this protection endures – and smallpox vaccination was discontinued in the 1970s. The experts emphasized the need for clinical studies of vaccines and therapeutics to better document their efficacy and understand how to use them in this and future outbreaks. The meeting also called for immediate implementation of public health activities including communicating prevention information, enhanced disease surveillance, contact tracing, isolation of cases and optimized care of people with the virus. Self-Care Practices Can Save Millions and Alleviate Pressure on Health Systems 06/06/2022 Aishwarya Tendolkar In a world where health workers are scarce, self-care practices can drastically improve people’s quality of life and alleviate strain on health systems, but depend on a range of factors including patient literacy, fair prices and government stewardship. This is according to a one-of-a-kind global study demonstrating the value of self-care that was launched on the sidelines of recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families, and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and to cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider.” Current self-care activities around the world are generating annual savings of approximately $119 billion, along with saving 11 billion patient hours worldwide, according to the study. The study was produced by the Swiss-based Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF), which represents manufacturers and distributors of non-prescription medicines on all continents. Self-care cost-saving (source: Global Self-Care Federation report). Low-income countries lagging But the low-income countries are still lagging in implementing and reaping the benefits of self-care. “In low-income countries, about 65% of households that could not obtain essential health services had financial constraints,” said Dr Ritu Sadana, WHO Head of Ageing and Health Division of Universal Health Coverge (UHC), one of the panelists at the launch of the report. “This is more than triple the proportion of households who lack access to health services because they are just unavailable, which is 20%.” High-income countries are reaping the most benefits of self-care practices while the low-and middle-income countries are playing catch-up. With increased adoption of self-care, we will be seeing an additional $19.5 billion in annual cost savings related to the increased adoption of self-care by 2030, said Ben Carrick, Johnson and Johnson’s senior director of consumer policy. “If we think about the welfare benefits, it could be leading to an annual increase of $312 billion per year globally. These are significant benefits that are worth chasing and grasping,” Carrick told the launch. To estimate the true #ValueofSelfCare, we must first understand how it operates across different global contexts. Our 3 country groupings allow us to unlock such insights. 🌏 Read the report to learn the full scope of benefits that can be achieved:https://t.co/h5gTOOsgUl pic.twitter.com/ZMrINWpIax — The Global Self-Care Federation (@Selfcarefed_org) June 6, 2022 The study grouped 155 countries based on their GDP levels, and then gauged the self-care effects. In the high-income countries (Group A), self-care is already making an indispensable contribution to relieving the burden on healthcare systems. But it is in the low-and middle-income countries (Group B and C), where self-care can enable a person to work and not depend on welfare. “We don’t need more GDP; we need more welfare and this is also what this project is about, this is what self-care is about… to generate more welfare and not just be focused on figures and economic factors,” said Professor Uwe May, Dean of Studies at Fresenius University. He added that currently if people practised self-care instead of doing nothing about their health issues, 41 billion productive days can be gained on a global level. Self-care ‘only option’ in poor countries The study also found that health economic and pharmacoeconomic approaches deployed to assess the value of self-care cannot be transferred to lower-income regions where the infrastructure, socio-economic factors, and awareness is different. In addition, lack of access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and the prevalence of traditional medicines also has an impact on self-care options. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia, self-care is not an alternative care option, but is often “the only possible access to treatment for most individuals”, according to the report. In these countries, self-care does not translate into saving on doctors’ and specialists’ time. “This is where the welfare benefits are really the main opportunity because it isn’t saving physicians’ time and people don’t have access to the physicians,” said Carrick. “But if it means that they’re productive, they’re back at work and they’re able to look after families, then it’s those welfare and productivity benefits that really come into play.”. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the practice of self-care and the use of OTC products leads to current welfare savings of $123 per capita per year. The more the OTC use increases, the greater the individual and societal benefits can be realised through self-care, according to the study “We estimated that at least 142 million older persons, about 14% of older persons worldwide, are unable to meet some of their basic needs. So the issues around self-care for themselves or by their families or care providers is extremely important,” said Carrick. What do we need now? The report highlights the need for private-public partnerships, digital and healthcare literacy in people living in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and better parameters to gauge healthcare outcomes in a country. “We need strong stewardship by government, and to have really strong capacities in government institutions…so that they can lead and shape how we actually get things done with the private sector, with multiple sectors across the government and also obviously, civil society and self-care demands with the active participation of people,” said Sadana. “Health literacy is a fundamental catalyst for change to ensure individuals comprehend and act on credible health information, becoming active self-managers of their own health,” said Carrick. Experts at the launch also highlighted the need for pharmacies to be more involved in developing better policies, and for governments to spend more on ensuring that self-care is delivered through, not only OTC and literacy, but also nutrition, lifestyle, and affordable healthcare. Sadana said that in India, 70% of all healthcare costs are paid out of pocket, and 70% of that was on drugs. “If we’re going to have a system which encourages self-care, using products that are evidence-based and quality-controlled, we still need to have a way to ensure that those are covered [by the health system] if we actually want a vast swathe of the population to use them.” Image Credits: Tbel Abuseridze/ Unsplash. Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
From Davos to Geneva: Taking Hepatitis Seriously 08/06/2022 Finn Jarle Rode Vacccination can effectively prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B – but few children in Africa receive the jab despite high prevalence As the World Hepatitis Summit 2022 takes place this week, some 354 million people are still living with viral hepatitis, despite the fact that vaccines, treatments and even cures are now available, says Finn Jarle Rode is Executive Director at the Hepatitis Fund. Until now, viral hepatitis elimination has been the neglected child of global health. At a glance that may appear an odd statement to make given that both a vaccine and treatment for hepatitis B (HBV) exist. And the 25 years that elapsed between the discovery of the HCV virus in 1989 and that of a cure for hepatitis C in 2014 represents one of the shortest periods of time for such a major R&D effort in infectious disease history. But these scientific breakthroughs are not enough. Today some 354 million people are still living with viral hepatitis, mainly in low and middle-income countries such as India, Bangladesh, China, and Pakistan. People wait to receive free hepatitis testing and treatment in Lahore, Pakistan, at a dedicated Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment Clinic. Only 9% of people living with HBV and 20% of those living with HCV have been tested and diagnosed. Of those diagnosed with HBV infection, 8% are on treatment, while 7% of those diagnosed with HCV infection have started treatment. Globally 1.4 million people are dying from viral hepatitis each year. Before COVID-19, tuberculosis was the world´s biggest infectious disease killer, claiming 1.6 million lives each year. That means that hepatitis has been the world’s third deadliest infectious disease even during the pandemic. Clearly, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) goal to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030 is not going to be reached if the inertia being seen today remains. This, despite the potential benefits of doing so: Every dollar invested in HBV elimination returns up to $2.23. Every dollar invested in HCV returns up to $3.42. A $1.00 vaccine course can prevent one child from getting HBV, and $80.00 can cure someone from HCV. Lack of political will & funding Event at Davos on the margins of the World Economic Forum discussed the still formidable financial and political barriers to viral hepatitis elimination The root cause of the problem is money followed by a lack of political commitment, issues covered in a 25 May panel at Davos held on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum on “Financing Viral Hepatitis Elimination”, including former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark, among other speakers. Today no government clearly leads on the Sustainable Development Goal Target 3.3 of ending communicable diseases including hepatitis. Advocacy and funding are not reaching the critical mass required to realistically end hepatitis. Polio eradication for instance, has been largely driven through the long-standing commitment of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, working in unison with the WHO. We need a similar show of leadership from the philanthropic community to replicate that success with hepatitis. The WHO estimates that only US$500 million is invested in hepatitis elimination per year. Malaria, with a comparable disease burden and lower mortality rates, receives $US3.3 billion per year. The hepatitis response is an unfortunate example of the disconnect between science and policy-making – where tools to effectively end the epidemic are available but decision-makers lack the financial impetus to do so. African region sees highest HBV burden – but newborns aren’t vaccinated Vaccination can effectively prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B In 2019, about 66% of the 1.5 million new HBV infections were concentrated in WHO’s Africa region. The majority of HBV transmission is driven by vertical transmission (from mother to baby). This is the most common and deadliest form of HBV transmission, as approximately 90% of children infected this way develop chronic HBV infection and up to a quarter of these infants also die prematurely from HBV-related causes. The younger a person is when they acquire HBV, the greater chance of chronic infection and premature death. Fortunately, an almost 100% effective vaccine exists to prevent HBV, delivered in a three or four-dose schedule. The first critical dose is known as a “birth dose” and must be delivered within 24 hours of birth (as recommended by WHO) to prevent 70-95% of transmission that occurs during or just after birth. Given the availability of this simple and effective intervention, no child should be born with this life-threatening, chronic disease. But despite the high burden of HBV in the region, only 11 of 47 countries in Africa include hepatitis B birth dose (HepB BD) as part of the routine infant immunization schedule. Only six per cent of African newborns are receiving the birth dose vaccine today. Linking up HIV and HBV services People waiting to receive free hepatitis C tests and vaccines on World Hepatitis Day, Rwanda. But campaigns are no replacement for integration into primary health care services Hepatitis needs big donors to drive bilateral aid and national government buy-in. But this doesn’t have to lead to exorbitant costs. First of all, we need to ensure better integration of viral hepatitis treatment into existing global health programmes, and take a people-centred approach to prevention, diagnosis and treatment. It makes no epidemiological or economic sense, for instance, that an HIV positive pregnant woman in Kenya attending a health care centre be provided with Nevirapine to prevent her infant from contracting HIV, but not also be given access to Tenofovir prophylaxis preventing mother-to-child transmission of HBV in late pregnancy, along with an opportunity to vaccinate her newborn against HBV. Secondly, we need more of the public-private partnerships that have to date proven effective. Much more. And that includes external catalytic funding. We need the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, The Islamic Bank, philanthropists, foundations. Inroads are possible This is not the stuff of fantasy. Inroads are possible, even in the most unlikely scenarios. Take Egypt: it has long held the highest rate of HCV infection in the world. One person out of every 10 used to live with viral hepatitis. But in 2014 the country began implementing a strategy that has made huge progress against the disease. A first step was to get the buy-in of various government ministries, not just the health portfolio. The second was to make the decision to integrate hepatitis C screening with screening for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in primary healthcare facilities. This approach reached some 60 million people, including nine million school children. At the same time, partnerships between civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organisations mobilised communities and drove high rates of screening, diagnosis and treatment. Since the country’s programme began, the number of Egyptians living with hepatitis C has dropped from 4.346 million in 2014 to 516,000 in 2021. Egypt´s remarkable response has shown that the goal of eliminating viral hepatitis is possible. With the right backing, it can be done everywhere. Finn Jarle Rode is Executive Director at the Hepatitis Fund, a global non-profit organization that funds catalytic actions by partners, including support for the development of strategic plans at the national and sub-national level; country-specific data; and health system capacity-strengthening. Image Credits: WHO, PKLI , WHO, WHO. WTO Expresses Optimism Over IP Waiver Agreement But Protestors Call for ‘Real TRIPS Waiver’ 07/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Protestors in New York City. World Trade Organization (WTO) leaders are hopeful that an agreement could be reached on a waiver on intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines at the Ministerial Council starting on Sunday – but the People’s Vaccine Alliance has organised global protests to demand “a real TRIPS waiver” ahead of the meeting. WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has expressed “cautious optimism” that agreement on the IP waiver is possible at the council, according to WTO spokesperson Daniel Pruzin. Speaking at a media briefing on Tuesday following a special meeting of the WTO General Council earlier in the day, Pruzin said that Ambassador Lansana Gberie, chair of the TRIPS Council, which is leading discussions on the waiver and the WTO’s response to the pandemic, was also optimistic. According to Gberie, delegations “entered into real negotiation mode [on Monday] in an effort to try to iron out their differences, particularly with regards to the waiver discussions,” said Pruzin. A small group meeting of the TRIPS Council on the waiver resumed negotiations on Tuesday evening. Too little, too late? On 3 May, Okonjo-Iweala put forward an “outcome document” on the waiver that had emerged from discussions with “the Quad” – the European Union, India, South Africa and the US. According to the WTO, the Quad adopted a “problem-solving approach aimed at identifying practical ways of clarifying, streamlining and simplifying how governments can override patent rights, under certain conditions, to enable diversification of production of COVID-19 vaccines”. However, there are still some sticking points on the proposal, even within the Quad, and the proposal has been widely condemned by health activists for being too little, too late. An IP waiver proposal for all COVID-related technology was first put on the table over 18 months ago by India and South Africa during the height of the pandemic when vaccines were in short supply. The current agreement is confined to COVID-19 vaccines, and it is being negotiated when there is a global glut of vaccines. The People’s Vaccine Alliance is planning global protests during the week aimed at pressuring US and European countries to “end COVID monopolies” and “deliver a real TRIPS waiver”, the global network announced on Tuesday. “The WTO is having its biggest meeting since the start of the pandemic. Feeling the pressure to do something on COVID, WTO leaders have introduced a bogus new proposal that not only fails to remove WTO barriers to COVID medicine accessibility, but actually introduces new obstacles,” according to the alliance. 🇪🇺🇩🇪🇨🇭🇬🇧World leaders, stop protecting Big Pharma and prolonging the global COVID pandemic! Lift Europe's block on a #TRIPSWaiver for COVID vaccines, tests & treatments and #EndCOVIDMonopolies #FightInequality pic.twitter.com/2ZJJsLanBA — #FightInequality (@FightInequality) June 7, 2022 Other big WTO agenda items Other big items on the agenda of the WTO Ministerial Council are a reduction in fishing subsidies, agricultural trade reform and reform of the WTO itself, including more regular ministerial meetings. Pruzin said the “significant progress” had been made on the fishing subsidies proposal, which has been negotiated for a number of years, and on possible ministerial declaration on WTO’s response to the pandemic, “There are still some very important differences which remain in the texts, and I think all the chairs recognise this, be it fisheries, be it agriculture, be in other areas as well,” said Pruzin. “But I think it’s fair to say that the atmosphere is much better than it has been in some time. I think there’s some good momentum going into the final preparations.” Image Credits: People's Vaccine Alliance. Moderna Doses First Participants in Phase 3 Study of mRNA Flu Vaccine 07/06/2022 Maayan Hoffman A medical assistant gives a flu vaccination. Moderna announced Tuesday that the first participants have been vaccinated in a Phase 3 study of its influenza (flu) vaccine, which is based on mRNA technology used in its COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine, mRNA-1010, encodes for hemagglutinin (HA) glycoproteins of the four influenza strains recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the prevention of influenza. Flu epidemics generally occur in the winter and some years can place a heavy burden on healthcare systems, with as many as 3 million to 5 million severe cases and, at its worst, as many as 650,000 deaths, according to WHO. The trial is expected to enroll approximately 6,000 adults in countries in the southern hemisphere. It is a randomized, observer-blind study that is meant to evaluate the safety and immunological efficacy of mRNA-1010 in comparison to a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine in adults 18 years and older. Participants will be randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single dose of mRNA-1010 or a single dose of a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine as a comparator. The company aims to run a confirmatory efficacy study for mRNA-1010 as early as the 2022/2023 northern hemisphere influenza season. “mRNA-1010 is the first of several influenza vaccine candidates we are developing with the aim of iteratively improving traditional vaccines by inducing broad and robust immune responses,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a release. “We believe our mRNA platform, with the flexibility and speed of our manufacturing process, is well-positioned to address the significant unmet need in seasonal flu. Moderna was founded 12 years ago and became well-known two years ago with the development of its SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine. It was the second mRNA vaccine ever to be produced and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The first mRNA vaccine was developed by Pfizer and BioNTech. Moderna is currently engaged in four Phase III studies, it said, including its SARS-CoV-2 booster, RSV, seasonal flu and CMV vaccine candidates. “Beginning in the fall of 2022, the company’s Phase III pipeline could lead to three respiratory commercial launches over the next two to three years,” Bancel said. Image Credits: Moderna, KEYSTONE/Gaetan Bally. ‘Monkeypox Begins – and Must be Resolved in – Endemic Countries’ 06/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, assistant general security for emergency response The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970, yet the viral disease is only getting international attention since it has spread outside Africa to 27 non-endemic countries. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Dr Ebrahima Socé Fall described monkeypox as a “neglected tropical disease” when he opened a two-day meeting called by the WHO’s R&D Blueprint to determine research priorities last Thursday. “We need to stop the chain of transmission and we believe at this stage we can still stop the chain of transmission in non-endemic countries by ensuring surveillance in certain population groups, cross investigation contact tracing, and maybe vaccination,” said Fall, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. However, WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo stressed at the meeting’s conclusion that the viral disease had to be addressed in the nine African countries where it is endemic. “The problem starts and has to be resolved at the level of the endemic countries,” said Restrepo, co-convenor of the R&D Blueprint that called the meeting, at the conclusion of the meeting. “There are researchers of high quality in these countries, and they are doing high-quality research despite the limitations, and our commitment is to support them.” Squirrel pox? The intention of the meeting – attended virtually by over 500 scientists – was to identify research priorities, and when it ended on Friday afternoon, the scientists had identified a long list of unknowns. One of the big questions is whether there is an “unknown animal reservoir” for monkeypox – with squirrels and rats being fingered as the most likely suspects. The Central African sun squirrel is particularly susceptible to monkeypox – and one researcher suggested the pox might have been more aptly named after it. “What was the first reservoir?” asked Dr Paul Fine of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “We think monkey because of the name monkeypox, but there were studies in a number of other species and it was found in several of them, in particular squirrels, particular the sun squirrel of Central Africa. So one might ask if this name is appropriate. Is it just monkeypox or are there other species very importantly, involved as reservoirs?” SARS Co-V2 comes from bats, while monkeypox could come from rats. Professor Jean-Jaques Muyembe Tamfum, director of the DRC’s Institute de Recherche Biomedicale, said that the majority of monkeypox cases in his country were children infected by hunting and handling rodents and squirrels. Adults were exposed to the virus by hunting monkeys. “The virus enters the body through the broken skin, and spreads in the mucous membranes and eyes, nose and the rest,” said Tamfum. Complications of monkeypox include bacterial conjunctivitis and even blindness. Scientists also raised whether rodents could be infected by “spillover” from human waste. The meeting resolved that a “comprehensive One Health approach” was needed to understand animal-to-human transmission and animal reservoirs. A ‘One Health’ approach is neeed for monkeypox Mutations and drivers Genomic sequencing of the current strain of monkeypox spreading internationally shows that it has 47 mutations when compared to a 2018 sample. This is surprisingly high, and one hypothesis is that the monkeypox virus has been mutating in an unknown animal – or perhaps more than one animal behind the two different clades – the Central African clade with a mortality rate of around 10% and the West African clade with a 2-3% fatality rate. Aside from the international spread of monkeypox, there has also been a dramatic increase in cases in endemic countries especially DRC and Nigeria. Nigeria’s Professor Dimie Ogoina told the meeting that his country was also seeing an increase in cases in areas where it had not previously been seen. Scientists thus want to unpack what is driving the transmission, as monkeypox is not known to be particularly infectious. In the past, infected people only passed the virus on to about 8-15% of the people living in the same house. The European outbreaks appear to stem from sexual contact at two events – in Berlin and on the Canary Islands, according to news reports. This is not typically how it has been transmitted, and the meeting raised a number of questions about sexual transmission – particularly whether it can be transmitted via semen and vaginal fluid, not just through contact with the infected lesions. “Monkeypox manifests in rashes. Would a person still engage in sex with these rashes? We need to look at asymptomatic transmission,” said Ogoina. Tricky diagnosis In Nigeria, men are significantly more likely to get monkeypox than women, raising questions about what makes them more vulnerable. Ogoina, from Niger Delta University, also revealed that people coinfected with HIV and monkeypox had “bigger lesions” and were more likely to have genital lesions – although only five such patients were examined. “It is very important just to recognise that the vast majority of recent cases, especially in DRC, are suspected cases or their probable cases or possible cases, they’re not confirmed,” stressed Fine. Some of the symptoms of monkeypox are similar to those of syphilis and chicken pox, and the meeting identified the need for better diagnostics. “WHO, through our regional offices, is working with African countries, regional institutions, technical and financial partners, to increase the ability to support disease surveillance laboratory diagnostics, readiness and response actions related to monkeypox,” said WHO epidemiologist Maria van Kerkhove. “We have to acknowledge the fact that this virus has been circulating for decades, and we now have attention to this. This unfortunately is a sad reality of the world that we live in. But we need to use this as an opportunity to advance our understanding of this virus to help everyone everywhere dealing with monkeypox,” said Van Kerkhove. Implementing COVID lessons Professor Helen Rees Professor Helen Rees, who moderated the two-day meeting, said that COVID-19 had shown the need for rapid global responses to emerging health threats. Rees called for “partnerships, collaboration, strategies that get us into the field quickly, antivirals and vaccines”. “We’re also seeing this interface with One Health, with environmental degradation and climate change. All of these things are coming to the fore. Just to underline this is not a pandemic, this is an outbreak that we are scratching our heads about. But the fact that we should respond now and rapidly is really excellent,” added Rees, a renowned scientist from South Africa’s University of Witwatersrand. WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo concluded the meeting by stressing that it was important to practice what had been preached during COVID-19. “We talked very much about the new health architecture for response to pandemics, and the lessons learned,” said Restrepo. “We are convinced that showing a good response for this multi-country outbreak is our best example of how we are going to be prepared for the next pandemic. “If we do when we all preach, we work together if we collaborate, we use master protocols, if we engage the countries; the communities – if we learn those lessons, and if we put equity at the centre of the discussions, then yes we have learned our lessons and we are moving forward towards being better prepared,” said Restrepo. Ana Maria Restrepo Expedited studies The meeting concluded with experts calling for expedited studies to better understand the disease epidemiology, clinical consequences, and modes of transmission. While the smallpox vaccine offers over 80% against monkeypox, it is unclear whether this protection endures – and smallpox vaccination was discontinued in the 1970s. The experts emphasized the need for clinical studies of vaccines and therapeutics to better document their efficacy and understand how to use them in this and future outbreaks. The meeting also called for immediate implementation of public health activities including communicating prevention information, enhanced disease surveillance, contact tracing, isolation of cases and optimized care of people with the virus. Self-Care Practices Can Save Millions and Alleviate Pressure on Health Systems 06/06/2022 Aishwarya Tendolkar In a world where health workers are scarce, self-care practices can drastically improve people’s quality of life and alleviate strain on health systems, but depend on a range of factors including patient literacy, fair prices and government stewardship. This is according to a one-of-a-kind global study demonstrating the value of self-care that was launched on the sidelines of recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families, and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and to cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider.” Current self-care activities around the world are generating annual savings of approximately $119 billion, along with saving 11 billion patient hours worldwide, according to the study. The study was produced by the Swiss-based Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF), which represents manufacturers and distributors of non-prescription medicines on all continents. Self-care cost-saving (source: Global Self-Care Federation report). Low-income countries lagging But the low-income countries are still lagging in implementing and reaping the benefits of self-care. “In low-income countries, about 65% of households that could not obtain essential health services had financial constraints,” said Dr Ritu Sadana, WHO Head of Ageing and Health Division of Universal Health Coverge (UHC), one of the panelists at the launch of the report. “This is more than triple the proportion of households who lack access to health services because they are just unavailable, which is 20%.” High-income countries are reaping the most benefits of self-care practices while the low-and middle-income countries are playing catch-up. With increased adoption of self-care, we will be seeing an additional $19.5 billion in annual cost savings related to the increased adoption of self-care by 2030, said Ben Carrick, Johnson and Johnson’s senior director of consumer policy. “If we think about the welfare benefits, it could be leading to an annual increase of $312 billion per year globally. These are significant benefits that are worth chasing and grasping,” Carrick told the launch. To estimate the true #ValueofSelfCare, we must first understand how it operates across different global contexts. Our 3 country groupings allow us to unlock such insights. 🌏 Read the report to learn the full scope of benefits that can be achieved:https://t.co/h5gTOOsgUl pic.twitter.com/ZMrINWpIax — The Global Self-Care Federation (@Selfcarefed_org) June 6, 2022 The study grouped 155 countries based on their GDP levels, and then gauged the self-care effects. In the high-income countries (Group A), self-care is already making an indispensable contribution to relieving the burden on healthcare systems. But it is in the low-and middle-income countries (Group B and C), where self-care can enable a person to work and not depend on welfare. “We don’t need more GDP; we need more welfare and this is also what this project is about, this is what self-care is about… to generate more welfare and not just be focused on figures and economic factors,” said Professor Uwe May, Dean of Studies at Fresenius University. He added that currently if people practised self-care instead of doing nothing about their health issues, 41 billion productive days can be gained on a global level. Self-care ‘only option’ in poor countries The study also found that health economic and pharmacoeconomic approaches deployed to assess the value of self-care cannot be transferred to lower-income regions where the infrastructure, socio-economic factors, and awareness is different. In addition, lack of access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and the prevalence of traditional medicines also has an impact on self-care options. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia, self-care is not an alternative care option, but is often “the only possible access to treatment for most individuals”, according to the report. In these countries, self-care does not translate into saving on doctors’ and specialists’ time. “This is where the welfare benefits are really the main opportunity because it isn’t saving physicians’ time and people don’t have access to the physicians,” said Carrick. “But if it means that they’re productive, they’re back at work and they’re able to look after families, then it’s those welfare and productivity benefits that really come into play.”. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the practice of self-care and the use of OTC products leads to current welfare savings of $123 per capita per year. The more the OTC use increases, the greater the individual and societal benefits can be realised through self-care, according to the study “We estimated that at least 142 million older persons, about 14% of older persons worldwide, are unable to meet some of their basic needs. So the issues around self-care for themselves or by their families or care providers is extremely important,” said Carrick. What do we need now? The report highlights the need for private-public partnerships, digital and healthcare literacy in people living in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and better parameters to gauge healthcare outcomes in a country. “We need strong stewardship by government, and to have really strong capacities in government institutions…so that they can lead and shape how we actually get things done with the private sector, with multiple sectors across the government and also obviously, civil society and self-care demands with the active participation of people,” said Sadana. “Health literacy is a fundamental catalyst for change to ensure individuals comprehend and act on credible health information, becoming active self-managers of their own health,” said Carrick. Experts at the launch also highlighted the need for pharmacies to be more involved in developing better policies, and for governments to spend more on ensuring that self-care is delivered through, not only OTC and literacy, but also nutrition, lifestyle, and affordable healthcare. Sadana said that in India, 70% of all healthcare costs are paid out of pocket, and 70% of that was on drugs. “If we’re going to have a system which encourages self-care, using products that are evidence-based and quality-controlled, we still need to have a way to ensure that those are covered [by the health system] if we actually want a vast swathe of the population to use them.” Image Credits: Tbel Abuseridze/ Unsplash. Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
WTO Expresses Optimism Over IP Waiver Agreement But Protestors Call for ‘Real TRIPS Waiver’ 07/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Protestors in New York City. World Trade Organization (WTO) leaders are hopeful that an agreement could be reached on a waiver on intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines at the Ministerial Council starting on Sunday – but the People’s Vaccine Alliance has organised global protests to demand “a real TRIPS waiver” ahead of the meeting. WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has expressed “cautious optimism” that agreement on the IP waiver is possible at the council, according to WTO spokesperson Daniel Pruzin. Speaking at a media briefing on Tuesday following a special meeting of the WTO General Council earlier in the day, Pruzin said that Ambassador Lansana Gberie, chair of the TRIPS Council, which is leading discussions on the waiver and the WTO’s response to the pandemic, was also optimistic. According to Gberie, delegations “entered into real negotiation mode [on Monday] in an effort to try to iron out their differences, particularly with regards to the waiver discussions,” said Pruzin. A small group meeting of the TRIPS Council on the waiver resumed negotiations on Tuesday evening. Too little, too late? On 3 May, Okonjo-Iweala put forward an “outcome document” on the waiver that had emerged from discussions with “the Quad” – the European Union, India, South Africa and the US. According to the WTO, the Quad adopted a “problem-solving approach aimed at identifying practical ways of clarifying, streamlining and simplifying how governments can override patent rights, under certain conditions, to enable diversification of production of COVID-19 vaccines”. However, there are still some sticking points on the proposal, even within the Quad, and the proposal has been widely condemned by health activists for being too little, too late. An IP waiver proposal for all COVID-related technology was first put on the table over 18 months ago by India and South Africa during the height of the pandemic when vaccines were in short supply. The current agreement is confined to COVID-19 vaccines, and it is being negotiated when there is a global glut of vaccines. The People’s Vaccine Alliance is planning global protests during the week aimed at pressuring US and European countries to “end COVID monopolies” and “deliver a real TRIPS waiver”, the global network announced on Tuesday. “The WTO is having its biggest meeting since the start of the pandemic. Feeling the pressure to do something on COVID, WTO leaders have introduced a bogus new proposal that not only fails to remove WTO barriers to COVID medicine accessibility, but actually introduces new obstacles,” according to the alliance. 🇪🇺🇩🇪🇨🇭🇬🇧World leaders, stop protecting Big Pharma and prolonging the global COVID pandemic! Lift Europe's block on a #TRIPSWaiver for COVID vaccines, tests & treatments and #EndCOVIDMonopolies #FightInequality pic.twitter.com/2ZJJsLanBA — #FightInequality (@FightInequality) June 7, 2022 Other big WTO agenda items Other big items on the agenda of the WTO Ministerial Council are a reduction in fishing subsidies, agricultural trade reform and reform of the WTO itself, including more regular ministerial meetings. Pruzin said the “significant progress” had been made on the fishing subsidies proposal, which has been negotiated for a number of years, and on possible ministerial declaration on WTO’s response to the pandemic, “There are still some very important differences which remain in the texts, and I think all the chairs recognise this, be it fisheries, be it agriculture, be in other areas as well,” said Pruzin. “But I think it’s fair to say that the atmosphere is much better than it has been in some time. I think there’s some good momentum going into the final preparations.” Image Credits: People's Vaccine Alliance. Moderna Doses First Participants in Phase 3 Study of mRNA Flu Vaccine 07/06/2022 Maayan Hoffman A medical assistant gives a flu vaccination. Moderna announced Tuesday that the first participants have been vaccinated in a Phase 3 study of its influenza (flu) vaccine, which is based on mRNA technology used in its COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine, mRNA-1010, encodes for hemagglutinin (HA) glycoproteins of the four influenza strains recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the prevention of influenza. Flu epidemics generally occur in the winter and some years can place a heavy burden on healthcare systems, with as many as 3 million to 5 million severe cases and, at its worst, as many as 650,000 deaths, according to WHO. The trial is expected to enroll approximately 6,000 adults in countries in the southern hemisphere. It is a randomized, observer-blind study that is meant to evaluate the safety and immunological efficacy of mRNA-1010 in comparison to a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine in adults 18 years and older. Participants will be randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single dose of mRNA-1010 or a single dose of a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine as a comparator. The company aims to run a confirmatory efficacy study for mRNA-1010 as early as the 2022/2023 northern hemisphere influenza season. “mRNA-1010 is the first of several influenza vaccine candidates we are developing with the aim of iteratively improving traditional vaccines by inducing broad and robust immune responses,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a release. “We believe our mRNA platform, with the flexibility and speed of our manufacturing process, is well-positioned to address the significant unmet need in seasonal flu. Moderna was founded 12 years ago and became well-known two years ago with the development of its SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine. It was the second mRNA vaccine ever to be produced and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The first mRNA vaccine was developed by Pfizer and BioNTech. Moderna is currently engaged in four Phase III studies, it said, including its SARS-CoV-2 booster, RSV, seasonal flu and CMV vaccine candidates. “Beginning in the fall of 2022, the company’s Phase III pipeline could lead to three respiratory commercial launches over the next two to three years,” Bancel said. Image Credits: Moderna, KEYSTONE/Gaetan Bally. ‘Monkeypox Begins – and Must be Resolved in – Endemic Countries’ 06/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, assistant general security for emergency response The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970, yet the viral disease is only getting international attention since it has spread outside Africa to 27 non-endemic countries. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Dr Ebrahima Socé Fall described monkeypox as a “neglected tropical disease” when he opened a two-day meeting called by the WHO’s R&D Blueprint to determine research priorities last Thursday. “We need to stop the chain of transmission and we believe at this stage we can still stop the chain of transmission in non-endemic countries by ensuring surveillance in certain population groups, cross investigation contact tracing, and maybe vaccination,” said Fall, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. However, WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo stressed at the meeting’s conclusion that the viral disease had to be addressed in the nine African countries where it is endemic. “The problem starts and has to be resolved at the level of the endemic countries,” said Restrepo, co-convenor of the R&D Blueprint that called the meeting, at the conclusion of the meeting. “There are researchers of high quality in these countries, and they are doing high-quality research despite the limitations, and our commitment is to support them.” Squirrel pox? The intention of the meeting – attended virtually by over 500 scientists – was to identify research priorities, and when it ended on Friday afternoon, the scientists had identified a long list of unknowns. One of the big questions is whether there is an “unknown animal reservoir” for monkeypox – with squirrels and rats being fingered as the most likely suspects. The Central African sun squirrel is particularly susceptible to monkeypox – and one researcher suggested the pox might have been more aptly named after it. “What was the first reservoir?” asked Dr Paul Fine of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “We think monkey because of the name monkeypox, but there were studies in a number of other species and it was found in several of them, in particular squirrels, particular the sun squirrel of Central Africa. So one might ask if this name is appropriate. Is it just monkeypox or are there other species very importantly, involved as reservoirs?” SARS Co-V2 comes from bats, while monkeypox could come from rats. Professor Jean-Jaques Muyembe Tamfum, director of the DRC’s Institute de Recherche Biomedicale, said that the majority of monkeypox cases in his country were children infected by hunting and handling rodents and squirrels. Adults were exposed to the virus by hunting monkeys. “The virus enters the body through the broken skin, and spreads in the mucous membranes and eyes, nose and the rest,” said Tamfum. Complications of monkeypox include bacterial conjunctivitis and even blindness. Scientists also raised whether rodents could be infected by “spillover” from human waste. The meeting resolved that a “comprehensive One Health approach” was needed to understand animal-to-human transmission and animal reservoirs. A ‘One Health’ approach is neeed for monkeypox Mutations and drivers Genomic sequencing of the current strain of monkeypox spreading internationally shows that it has 47 mutations when compared to a 2018 sample. This is surprisingly high, and one hypothesis is that the monkeypox virus has been mutating in an unknown animal – or perhaps more than one animal behind the two different clades – the Central African clade with a mortality rate of around 10% and the West African clade with a 2-3% fatality rate. Aside from the international spread of monkeypox, there has also been a dramatic increase in cases in endemic countries especially DRC and Nigeria. Nigeria’s Professor Dimie Ogoina told the meeting that his country was also seeing an increase in cases in areas where it had not previously been seen. Scientists thus want to unpack what is driving the transmission, as monkeypox is not known to be particularly infectious. In the past, infected people only passed the virus on to about 8-15% of the people living in the same house. The European outbreaks appear to stem from sexual contact at two events – in Berlin and on the Canary Islands, according to news reports. This is not typically how it has been transmitted, and the meeting raised a number of questions about sexual transmission – particularly whether it can be transmitted via semen and vaginal fluid, not just through contact with the infected lesions. “Monkeypox manifests in rashes. Would a person still engage in sex with these rashes? We need to look at asymptomatic transmission,” said Ogoina. Tricky diagnosis In Nigeria, men are significantly more likely to get monkeypox than women, raising questions about what makes them more vulnerable. Ogoina, from Niger Delta University, also revealed that people coinfected with HIV and monkeypox had “bigger lesions” and were more likely to have genital lesions – although only five such patients were examined. “It is very important just to recognise that the vast majority of recent cases, especially in DRC, are suspected cases or their probable cases or possible cases, they’re not confirmed,” stressed Fine. Some of the symptoms of monkeypox are similar to those of syphilis and chicken pox, and the meeting identified the need for better diagnostics. “WHO, through our regional offices, is working with African countries, regional institutions, technical and financial partners, to increase the ability to support disease surveillance laboratory diagnostics, readiness and response actions related to monkeypox,” said WHO epidemiologist Maria van Kerkhove. “We have to acknowledge the fact that this virus has been circulating for decades, and we now have attention to this. This unfortunately is a sad reality of the world that we live in. But we need to use this as an opportunity to advance our understanding of this virus to help everyone everywhere dealing with monkeypox,” said Van Kerkhove. Implementing COVID lessons Professor Helen Rees Professor Helen Rees, who moderated the two-day meeting, said that COVID-19 had shown the need for rapid global responses to emerging health threats. Rees called for “partnerships, collaboration, strategies that get us into the field quickly, antivirals and vaccines”. “We’re also seeing this interface with One Health, with environmental degradation and climate change. All of these things are coming to the fore. Just to underline this is not a pandemic, this is an outbreak that we are scratching our heads about. But the fact that we should respond now and rapidly is really excellent,” added Rees, a renowned scientist from South Africa’s University of Witwatersrand. WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo concluded the meeting by stressing that it was important to practice what had been preached during COVID-19. “We talked very much about the new health architecture for response to pandemics, and the lessons learned,” said Restrepo. “We are convinced that showing a good response for this multi-country outbreak is our best example of how we are going to be prepared for the next pandemic. “If we do when we all preach, we work together if we collaborate, we use master protocols, if we engage the countries; the communities – if we learn those lessons, and if we put equity at the centre of the discussions, then yes we have learned our lessons and we are moving forward towards being better prepared,” said Restrepo. Ana Maria Restrepo Expedited studies The meeting concluded with experts calling for expedited studies to better understand the disease epidemiology, clinical consequences, and modes of transmission. While the smallpox vaccine offers over 80% against monkeypox, it is unclear whether this protection endures – and smallpox vaccination was discontinued in the 1970s. The experts emphasized the need for clinical studies of vaccines and therapeutics to better document their efficacy and understand how to use them in this and future outbreaks. The meeting also called for immediate implementation of public health activities including communicating prevention information, enhanced disease surveillance, contact tracing, isolation of cases and optimized care of people with the virus. Self-Care Practices Can Save Millions and Alleviate Pressure on Health Systems 06/06/2022 Aishwarya Tendolkar In a world where health workers are scarce, self-care practices can drastically improve people’s quality of life and alleviate strain on health systems, but depend on a range of factors including patient literacy, fair prices and government stewardship. This is according to a one-of-a-kind global study demonstrating the value of self-care that was launched on the sidelines of recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families, and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and to cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider.” Current self-care activities around the world are generating annual savings of approximately $119 billion, along with saving 11 billion patient hours worldwide, according to the study. The study was produced by the Swiss-based Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF), which represents manufacturers and distributors of non-prescription medicines on all continents. Self-care cost-saving (source: Global Self-Care Federation report). Low-income countries lagging But the low-income countries are still lagging in implementing and reaping the benefits of self-care. “In low-income countries, about 65% of households that could not obtain essential health services had financial constraints,” said Dr Ritu Sadana, WHO Head of Ageing and Health Division of Universal Health Coverge (UHC), one of the panelists at the launch of the report. “This is more than triple the proportion of households who lack access to health services because they are just unavailable, which is 20%.” High-income countries are reaping the most benefits of self-care practices while the low-and middle-income countries are playing catch-up. With increased adoption of self-care, we will be seeing an additional $19.5 billion in annual cost savings related to the increased adoption of self-care by 2030, said Ben Carrick, Johnson and Johnson’s senior director of consumer policy. “If we think about the welfare benefits, it could be leading to an annual increase of $312 billion per year globally. These are significant benefits that are worth chasing and grasping,” Carrick told the launch. To estimate the true #ValueofSelfCare, we must first understand how it operates across different global contexts. Our 3 country groupings allow us to unlock such insights. 🌏 Read the report to learn the full scope of benefits that can be achieved:https://t.co/h5gTOOsgUl pic.twitter.com/ZMrINWpIax — The Global Self-Care Federation (@Selfcarefed_org) June 6, 2022 The study grouped 155 countries based on their GDP levels, and then gauged the self-care effects. In the high-income countries (Group A), self-care is already making an indispensable contribution to relieving the burden on healthcare systems. But it is in the low-and middle-income countries (Group B and C), where self-care can enable a person to work and not depend on welfare. “We don’t need more GDP; we need more welfare and this is also what this project is about, this is what self-care is about… to generate more welfare and not just be focused on figures and economic factors,” said Professor Uwe May, Dean of Studies at Fresenius University. He added that currently if people practised self-care instead of doing nothing about their health issues, 41 billion productive days can be gained on a global level. Self-care ‘only option’ in poor countries The study also found that health economic and pharmacoeconomic approaches deployed to assess the value of self-care cannot be transferred to lower-income regions where the infrastructure, socio-economic factors, and awareness is different. In addition, lack of access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and the prevalence of traditional medicines also has an impact on self-care options. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia, self-care is not an alternative care option, but is often “the only possible access to treatment for most individuals”, according to the report. In these countries, self-care does not translate into saving on doctors’ and specialists’ time. “This is where the welfare benefits are really the main opportunity because it isn’t saving physicians’ time and people don’t have access to the physicians,” said Carrick. “But if it means that they’re productive, they’re back at work and they’re able to look after families, then it’s those welfare and productivity benefits that really come into play.”. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the practice of self-care and the use of OTC products leads to current welfare savings of $123 per capita per year. The more the OTC use increases, the greater the individual and societal benefits can be realised through self-care, according to the study “We estimated that at least 142 million older persons, about 14% of older persons worldwide, are unable to meet some of their basic needs. So the issues around self-care for themselves or by their families or care providers is extremely important,” said Carrick. What do we need now? The report highlights the need for private-public partnerships, digital and healthcare literacy in people living in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and better parameters to gauge healthcare outcomes in a country. “We need strong stewardship by government, and to have really strong capacities in government institutions…so that they can lead and shape how we actually get things done with the private sector, with multiple sectors across the government and also obviously, civil society and self-care demands with the active participation of people,” said Sadana. “Health literacy is a fundamental catalyst for change to ensure individuals comprehend and act on credible health information, becoming active self-managers of their own health,” said Carrick. Experts at the launch also highlighted the need for pharmacies to be more involved in developing better policies, and for governments to spend more on ensuring that self-care is delivered through, not only OTC and literacy, but also nutrition, lifestyle, and affordable healthcare. Sadana said that in India, 70% of all healthcare costs are paid out of pocket, and 70% of that was on drugs. “If we’re going to have a system which encourages self-care, using products that are evidence-based and quality-controlled, we still need to have a way to ensure that those are covered [by the health system] if we actually want a vast swathe of the population to use them.” Image Credits: Tbel Abuseridze/ Unsplash. Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Moderna Doses First Participants in Phase 3 Study of mRNA Flu Vaccine 07/06/2022 Maayan Hoffman A medical assistant gives a flu vaccination. Moderna announced Tuesday that the first participants have been vaccinated in a Phase 3 study of its influenza (flu) vaccine, which is based on mRNA technology used in its COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine, mRNA-1010, encodes for hemagglutinin (HA) glycoproteins of the four influenza strains recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the prevention of influenza. Flu epidemics generally occur in the winter and some years can place a heavy burden on healthcare systems, with as many as 3 million to 5 million severe cases and, at its worst, as many as 650,000 deaths, according to WHO. The trial is expected to enroll approximately 6,000 adults in countries in the southern hemisphere. It is a randomized, observer-blind study that is meant to evaluate the safety and immunological efficacy of mRNA-1010 in comparison to a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine in adults 18 years and older. Participants will be randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single dose of mRNA-1010 or a single dose of a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine as a comparator. The company aims to run a confirmatory efficacy study for mRNA-1010 as early as the 2022/2023 northern hemisphere influenza season. “mRNA-1010 is the first of several influenza vaccine candidates we are developing with the aim of iteratively improving traditional vaccines by inducing broad and robust immune responses,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a release. “We believe our mRNA platform, with the flexibility and speed of our manufacturing process, is well-positioned to address the significant unmet need in seasonal flu. Moderna was founded 12 years ago and became well-known two years ago with the development of its SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine. It was the second mRNA vaccine ever to be produced and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The first mRNA vaccine was developed by Pfizer and BioNTech. Moderna is currently engaged in four Phase III studies, it said, including its SARS-CoV-2 booster, RSV, seasonal flu and CMV vaccine candidates. “Beginning in the fall of 2022, the company’s Phase III pipeline could lead to three respiratory commercial launches over the next two to three years,” Bancel said. Image Credits: Moderna, KEYSTONE/Gaetan Bally. ‘Monkeypox Begins – and Must be Resolved in – Endemic Countries’ 06/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, assistant general security for emergency response The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970, yet the viral disease is only getting international attention since it has spread outside Africa to 27 non-endemic countries. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Dr Ebrahima Socé Fall described monkeypox as a “neglected tropical disease” when he opened a two-day meeting called by the WHO’s R&D Blueprint to determine research priorities last Thursday. “We need to stop the chain of transmission and we believe at this stage we can still stop the chain of transmission in non-endemic countries by ensuring surveillance in certain population groups, cross investigation contact tracing, and maybe vaccination,” said Fall, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. However, WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo stressed at the meeting’s conclusion that the viral disease had to be addressed in the nine African countries where it is endemic. “The problem starts and has to be resolved at the level of the endemic countries,” said Restrepo, co-convenor of the R&D Blueprint that called the meeting, at the conclusion of the meeting. “There are researchers of high quality in these countries, and they are doing high-quality research despite the limitations, and our commitment is to support them.” Squirrel pox? The intention of the meeting – attended virtually by over 500 scientists – was to identify research priorities, and when it ended on Friday afternoon, the scientists had identified a long list of unknowns. One of the big questions is whether there is an “unknown animal reservoir” for monkeypox – with squirrels and rats being fingered as the most likely suspects. The Central African sun squirrel is particularly susceptible to monkeypox – and one researcher suggested the pox might have been more aptly named after it. “What was the first reservoir?” asked Dr Paul Fine of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “We think monkey because of the name monkeypox, but there were studies in a number of other species and it was found in several of them, in particular squirrels, particular the sun squirrel of Central Africa. So one might ask if this name is appropriate. Is it just monkeypox or are there other species very importantly, involved as reservoirs?” SARS Co-V2 comes from bats, while monkeypox could come from rats. Professor Jean-Jaques Muyembe Tamfum, director of the DRC’s Institute de Recherche Biomedicale, said that the majority of monkeypox cases in his country were children infected by hunting and handling rodents and squirrels. Adults were exposed to the virus by hunting monkeys. “The virus enters the body through the broken skin, and spreads in the mucous membranes and eyes, nose and the rest,” said Tamfum. Complications of monkeypox include bacterial conjunctivitis and even blindness. Scientists also raised whether rodents could be infected by “spillover” from human waste. The meeting resolved that a “comprehensive One Health approach” was needed to understand animal-to-human transmission and animal reservoirs. A ‘One Health’ approach is neeed for monkeypox Mutations and drivers Genomic sequencing of the current strain of monkeypox spreading internationally shows that it has 47 mutations when compared to a 2018 sample. This is surprisingly high, and one hypothesis is that the monkeypox virus has been mutating in an unknown animal – or perhaps more than one animal behind the two different clades – the Central African clade with a mortality rate of around 10% and the West African clade with a 2-3% fatality rate. Aside from the international spread of monkeypox, there has also been a dramatic increase in cases in endemic countries especially DRC and Nigeria. Nigeria’s Professor Dimie Ogoina told the meeting that his country was also seeing an increase in cases in areas where it had not previously been seen. Scientists thus want to unpack what is driving the transmission, as monkeypox is not known to be particularly infectious. In the past, infected people only passed the virus on to about 8-15% of the people living in the same house. The European outbreaks appear to stem from sexual contact at two events – in Berlin and on the Canary Islands, according to news reports. This is not typically how it has been transmitted, and the meeting raised a number of questions about sexual transmission – particularly whether it can be transmitted via semen and vaginal fluid, not just through contact with the infected lesions. “Monkeypox manifests in rashes. Would a person still engage in sex with these rashes? We need to look at asymptomatic transmission,” said Ogoina. Tricky diagnosis In Nigeria, men are significantly more likely to get monkeypox than women, raising questions about what makes them more vulnerable. Ogoina, from Niger Delta University, also revealed that people coinfected with HIV and monkeypox had “bigger lesions” and were more likely to have genital lesions – although only five such patients were examined. “It is very important just to recognise that the vast majority of recent cases, especially in DRC, are suspected cases or their probable cases or possible cases, they’re not confirmed,” stressed Fine. Some of the symptoms of monkeypox are similar to those of syphilis and chicken pox, and the meeting identified the need for better diagnostics. “WHO, through our regional offices, is working with African countries, regional institutions, technical and financial partners, to increase the ability to support disease surveillance laboratory diagnostics, readiness and response actions related to monkeypox,” said WHO epidemiologist Maria van Kerkhove. “We have to acknowledge the fact that this virus has been circulating for decades, and we now have attention to this. This unfortunately is a sad reality of the world that we live in. But we need to use this as an opportunity to advance our understanding of this virus to help everyone everywhere dealing with monkeypox,” said Van Kerkhove. Implementing COVID lessons Professor Helen Rees Professor Helen Rees, who moderated the two-day meeting, said that COVID-19 had shown the need for rapid global responses to emerging health threats. Rees called for “partnerships, collaboration, strategies that get us into the field quickly, antivirals and vaccines”. “We’re also seeing this interface with One Health, with environmental degradation and climate change. All of these things are coming to the fore. Just to underline this is not a pandemic, this is an outbreak that we are scratching our heads about. But the fact that we should respond now and rapidly is really excellent,” added Rees, a renowned scientist from South Africa’s University of Witwatersrand. WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo concluded the meeting by stressing that it was important to practice what had been preached during COVID-19. “We talked very much about the new health architecture for response to pandemics, and the lessons learned,” said Restrepo. “We are convinced that showing a good response for this multi-country outbreak is our best example of how we are going to be prepared for the next pandemic. “If we do when we all preach, we work together if we collaborate, we use master protocols, if we engage the countries; the communities – if we learn those lessons, and if we put equity at the centre of the discussions, then yes we have learned our lessons and we are moving forward towards being better prepared,” said Restrepo. Ana Maria Restrepo Expedited studies The meeting concluded with experts calling for expedited studies to better understand the disease epidemiology, clinical consequences, and modes of transmission. While the smallpox vaccine offers over 80% against monkeypox, it is unclear whether this protection endures – and smallpox vaccination was discontinued in the 1970s. The experts emphasized the need for clinical studies of vaccines and therapeutics to better document their efficacy and understand how to use them in this and future outbreaks. The meeting also called for immediate implementation of public health activities including communicating prevention information, enhanced disease surveillance, contact tracing, isolation of cases and optimized care of people with the virus. Self-Care Practices Can Save Millions and Alleviate Pressure on Health Systems 06/06/2022 Aishwarya Tendolkar In a world where health workers are scarce, self-care practices can drastically improve people’s quality of life and alleviate strain on health systems, but depend on a range of factors including patient literacy, fair prices and government stewardship. This is according to a one-of-a-kind global study demonstrating the value of self-care that was launched on the sidelines of recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families, and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and to cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider.” Current self-care activities around the world are generating annual savings of approximately $119 billion, along with saving 11 billion patient hours worldwide, according to the study. The study was produced by the Swiss-based Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF), which represents manufacturers and distributors of non-prescription medicines on all continents. Self-care cost-saving (source: Global Self-Care Federation report). Low-income countries lagging But the low-income countries are still lagging in implementing and reaping the benefits of self-care. “In low-income countries, about 65% of households that could not obtain essential health services had financial constraints,” said Dr Ritu Sadana, WHO Head of Ageing and Health Division of Universal Health Coverge (UHC), one of the panelists at the launch of the report. “This is more than triple the proportion of households who lack access to health services because they are just unavailable, which is 20%.” High-income countries are reaping the most benefits of self-care practices while the low-and middle-income countries are playing catch-up. With increased adoption of self-care, we will be seeing an additional $19.5 billion in annual cost savings related to the increased adoption of self-care by 2030, said Ben Carrick, Johnson and Johnson’s senior director of consumer policy. “If we think about the welfare benefits, it could be leading to an annual increase of $312 billion per year globally. These are significant benefits that are worth chasing and grasping,” Carrick told the launch. To estimate the true #ValueofSelfCare, we must first understand how it operates across different global contexts. Our 3 country groupings allow us to unlock such insights. 🌏 Read the report to learn the full scope of benefits that can be achieved:https://t.co/h5gTOOsgUl pic.twitter.com/ZMrINWpIax — The Global Self-Care Federation (@Selfcarefed_org) June 6, 2022 The study grouped 155 countries based on their GDP levels, and then gauged the self-care effects. In the high-income countries (Group A), self-care is already making an indispensable contribution to relieving the burden on healthcare systems. But it is in the low-and middle-income countries (Group B and C), where self-care can enable a person to work and not depend on welfare. “We don’t need more GDP; we need more welfare and this is also what this project is about, this is what self-care is about… to generate more welfare and not just be focused on figures and economic factors,” said Professor Uwe May, Dean of Studies at Fresenius University. He added that currently if people practised self-care instead of doing nothing about their health issues, 41 billion productive days can be gained on a global level. Self-care ‘only option’ in poor countries The study also found that health economic and pharmacoeconomic approaches deployed to assess the value of self-care cannot be transferred to lower-income regions where the infrastructure, socio-economic factors, and awareness is different. In addition, lack of access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and the prevalence of traditional medicines also has an impact on self-care options. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia, self-care is not an alternative care option, but is often “the only possible access to treatment for most individuals”, according to the report. In these countries, self-care does not translate into saving on doctors’ and specialists’ time. “This is where the welfare benefits are really the main opportunity because it isn’t saving physicians’ time and people don’t have access to the physicians,” said Carrick. “But if it means that they’re productive, they’re back at work and they’re able to look after families, then it’s those welfare and productivity benefits that really come into play.”. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the practice of self-care and the use of OTC products leads to current welfare savings of $123 per capita per year. The more the OTC use increases, the greater the individual and societal benefits can be realised through self-care, according to the study “We estimated that at least 142 million older persons, about 14% of older persons worldwide, are unable to meet some of their basic needs. So the issues around self-care for themselves or by their families or care providers is extremely important,” said Carrick. What do we need now? The report highlights the need for private-public partnerships, digital and healthcare literacy in people living in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and better parameters to gauge healthcare outcomes in a country. “We need strong stewardship by government, and to have really strong capacities in government institutions…so that they can lead and shape how we actually get things done with the private sector, with multiple sectors across the government and also obviously, civil society and self-care demands with the active participation of people,” said Sadana. “Health literacy is a fundamental catalyst for change to ensure individuals comprehend and act on credible health information, becoming active self-managers of their own health,” said Carrick. Experts at the launch also highlighted the need for pharmacies to be more involved in developing better policies, and for governments to spend more on ensuring that self-care is delivered through, not only OTC and literacy, but also nutrition, lifestyle, and affordable healthcare. Sadana said that in India, 70% of all healthcare costs are paid out of pocket, and 70% of that was on drugs. “If we’re going to have a system which encourages self-care, using products that are evidence-based and quality-controlled, we still need to have a way to ensure that those are covered [by the health system] if we actually want a vast swathe of the population to use them.” Image Credits: Tbel Abuseridze/ Unsplash. Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
‘Monkeypox Begins – and Must be Resolved in – Endemic Countries’ 06/06/2022 Kerry Cullinan Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, assistant general security for emergency response The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970, yet the viral disease is only getting international attention since it has spread outside Africa to 27 non-endemic countries. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Dr Ebrahima Socé Fall described monkeypox as a “neglected tropical disease” when he opened a two-day meeting called by the WHO’s R&D Blueprint to determine research priorities last Thursday. “We need to stop the chain of transmission and we believe at this stage we can still stop the chain of transmission in non-endemic countries by ensuring surveillance in certain population groups, cross investigation contact tracing, and maybe vaccination,” said Fall, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for Emergencies Response. However, WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo stressed at the meeting’s conclusion that the viral disease had to be addressed in the nine African countries where it is endemic. “The problem starts and has to be resolved at the level of the endemic countries,” said Restrepo, co-convenor of the R&D Blueprint that called the meeting, at the conclusion of the meeting. “There are researchers of high quality in these countries, and they are doing high-quality research despite the limitations, and our commitment is to support them.” Squirrel pox? The intention of the meeting – attended virtually by over 500 scientists – was to identify research priorities, and when it ended on Friday afternoon, the scientists had identified a long list of unknowns. One of the big questions is whether there is an “unknown animal reservoir” for monkeypox – with squirrels and rats being fingered as the most likely suspects. The Central African sun squirrel is particularly susceptible to monkeypox – and one researcher suggested the pox might have been more aptly named after it. “What was the first reservoir?” asked Dr Paul Fine of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “We think monkey because of the name monkeypox, but there were studies in a number of other species and it was found in several of them, in particular squirrels, particular the sun squirrel of Central Africa. So one might ask if this name is appropriate. Is it just monkeypox or are there other species very importantly, involved as reservoirs?” SARS Co-V2 comes from bats, while monkeypox could come from rats. Professor Jean-Jaques Muyembe Tamfum, director of the DRC’s Institute de Recherche Biomedicale, said that the majority of monkeypox cases in his country were children infected by hunting and handling rodents and squirrels. Adults were exposed to the virus by hunting monkeys. “The virus enters the body through the broken skin, and spreads in the mucous membranes and eyes, nose and the rest,” said Tamfum. Complications of monkeypox include bacterial conjunctivitis and even blindness. Scientists also raised whether rodents could be infected by “spillover” from human waste. The meeting resolved that a “comprehensive One Health approach” was needed to understand animal-to-human transmission and animal reservoirs. A ‘One Health’ approach is neeed for monkeypox Mutations and drivers Genomic sequencing of the current strain of monkeypox spreading internationally shows that it has 47 mutations when compared to a 2018 sample. This is surprisingly high, and one hypothesis is that the monkeypox virus has been mutating in an unknown animal – or perhaps more than one animal behind the two different clades – the Central African clade with a mortality rate of around 10% and the West African clade with a 2-3% fatality rate. Aside from the international spread of monkeypox, there has also been a dramatic increase in cases in endemic countries especially DRC and Nigeria. Nigeria’s Professor Dimie Ogoina told the meeting that his country was also seeing an increase in cases in areas where it had not previously been seen. Scientists thus want to unpack what is driving the transmission, as monkeypox is not known to be particularly infectious. In the past, infected people only passed the virus on to about 8-15% of the people living in the same house. The European outbreaks appear to stem from sexual contact at two events – in Berlin and on the Canary Islands, according to news reports. This is not typically how it has been transmitted, and the meeting raised a number of questions about sexual transmission – particularly whether it can be transmitted via semen and vaginal fluid, not just through contact with the infected lesions. “Monkeypox manifests in rashes. Would a person still engage in sex with these rashes? We need to look at asymptomatic transmission,” said Ogoina. Tricky diagnosis In Nigeria, men are significantly more likely to get monkeypox than women, raising questions about what makes them more vulnerable. Ogoina, from Niger Delta University, also revealed that people coinfected with HIV and monkeypox had “bigger lesions” and were more likely to have genital lesions – although only five such patients were examined. “It is very important just to recognise that the vast majority of recent cases, especially in DRC, are suspected cases or their probable cases or possible cases, they’re not confirmed,” stressed Fine. Some of the symptoms of monkeypox are similar to those of syphilis and chicken pox, and the meeting identified the need for better diagnostics. “WHO, through our regional offices, is working with African countries, regional institutions, technical and financial partners, to increase the ability to support disease surveillance laboratory diagnostics, readiness and response actions related to monkeypox,” said WHO epidemiologist Maria van Kerkhove. “We have to acknowledge the fact that this virus has been circulating for decades, and we now have attention to this. This unfortunately is a sad reality of the world that we live in. But we need to use this as an opportunity to advance our understanding of this virus to help everyone everywhere dealing with monkeypox,” said Van Kerkhove. Implementing COVID lessons Professor Helen Rees Professor Helen Rees, who moderated the two-day meeting, said that COVID-19 had shown the need for rapid global responses to emerging health threats. Rees called for “partnerships, collaboration, strategies that get us into the field quickly, antivirals and vaccines”. “We’re also seeing this interface with One Health, with environmental degradation and climate change. All of these things are coming to the fore. Just to underline this is not a pandemic, this is an outbreak that we are scratching our heads about. But the fact that we should respond now and rapidly is really excellent,” added Rees, a renowned scientist from South Africa’s University of Witwatersrand. WHO scientist Ana Maria Restrepo concluded the meeting by stressing that it was important to practice what had been preached during COVID-19. “We talked very much about the new health architecture for response to pandemics, and the lessons learned,” said Restrepo. “We are convinced that showing a good response for this multi-country outbreak is our best example of how we are going to be prepared for the next pandemic. “If we do when we all preach, we work together if we collaborate, we use master protocols, if we engage the countries; the communities – if we learn those lessons, and if we put equity at the centre of the discussions, then yes we have learned our lessons and we are moving forward towards being better prepared,” said Restrepo. Ana Maria Restrepo Expedited studies The meeting concluded with experts calling for expedited studies to better understand the disease epidemiology, clinical consequences, and modes of transmission. While the smallpox vaccine offers over 80% against monkeypox, it is unclear whether this protection endures – and smallpox vaccination was discontinued in the 1970s. The experts emphasized the need for clinical studies of vaccines and therapeutics to better document their efficacy and understand how to use them in this and future outbreaks. The meeting also called for immediate implementation of public health activities including communicating prevention information, enhanced disease surveillance, contact tracing, isolation of cases and optimized care of people with the virus. Self-Care Practices Can Save Millions and Alleviate Pressure on Health Systems 06/06/2022 Aishwarya Tendolkar In a world where health workers are scarce, self-care practices can drastically improve people’s quality of life and alleviate strain on health systems, but depend on a range of factors including patient literacy, fair prices and government stewardship. This is according to a one-of-a-kind global study demonstrating the value of self-care that was launched on the sidelines of recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families, and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and to cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider.” Current self-care activities around the world are generating annual savings of approximately $119 billion, along with saving 11 billion patient hours worldwide, according to the study. The study was produced by the Swiss-based Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF), which represents manufacturers and distributors of non-prescription medicines on all continents. Self-care cost-saving (source: Global Self-Care Federation report). Low-income countries lagging But the low-income countries are still lagging in implementing and reaping the benefits of self-care. “In low-income countries, about 65% of households that could not obtain essential health services had financial constraints,” said Dr Ritu Sadana, WHO Head of Ageing and Health Division of Universal Health Coverge (UHC), one of the panelists at the launch of the report. “This is more than triple the proportion of households who lack access to health services because they are just unavailable, which is 20%.” High-income countries are reaping the most benefits of self-care practices while the low-and middle-income countries are playing catch-up. With increased adoption of self-care, we will be seeing an additional $19.5 billion in annual cost savings related to the increased adoption of self-care by 2030, said Ben Carrick, Johnson and Johnson’s senior director of consumer policy. “If we think about the welfare benefits, it could be leading to an annual increase of $312 billion per year globally. These are significant benefits that are worth chasing and grasping,” Carrick told the launch. To estimate the true #ValueofSelfCare, we must first understand how it operates across different global contexts. Our 3 country groupings allow us to unlock such insights. 🌏 Read the report to learn the full scope of benefits that can be achieved:https://t.co/h5gTOOsgUl pic.twitter.com/ZMrINWpIax — The Global Self-Care Federation (@Selfcarefed_org) June 6, 2022 The study grouped 155 countries based on their GDP levels, and then gauged the self-care effects. In the high-income countries (Group A), self-care is already making an indispensable contribution to relieving the burden on healthcare systems. But it is in the low-and middle-income countries (Group B and C), where self-care can enable a person to work and not depend on welfare. “We don’t need more GDP; we need more welfare and this is also what this project is about, this is what self-care is about… to generate more welfare and not just be focused on figures and economic factors,” said Professor Uwe May, Dean of Studies at Fresenius University. He added that currently if people practised self-care instead of doing nothing about their health issues, 41 billion productive days can be gained on a global level. Self-care ‘only option’ in poor countries The study also found that health economic and pharmacoeconomic approaches deployed to assess the value of self-care cannot be transferred to lower-income regions where the infrastructure, socio-economic factors, and awareness is different. In addition, lack of access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and the prevalence of traditional medicines also has an impact on self-care options. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia, self-care is not an alternative care option, but is often “the only possible access to treatment for most individuals”, according to the report. In these countries, self-care does not translate into saving on doctors’ and specialists’ time. “This is where the welfare benefits are really the main opportunity because it isn’t saving physicians’ time and people don’t have access to the physicians,” said Carrick. “But if it means that they’re productive, they’re back at work and they’re able to look after families, then it’s those welfare and productivity benefits that really come into play.”. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the practice of self-care and the use of OTC products leads to current welfare savings of $123 per capita per year. The more the OTC use increases, the greater the individual and societal benefits can be realised through self-care, according to the study “We estimated that at least 142 million older persons, about 14% of older persons worldwide, are unable to meet some of their basic needs. So the issues around self-care for themselves or by their families or care providers is extremely important,” said Carrick. What do we need now? The report highlights the need for private-public partnerships, digital and healthcare literacy in people living in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and better parameters to gauge healthcare outcomes in a country. “We need strong stewardship by government, and to have really strong capacities in government institutions…so that they can lead and shape how we actually get things done with the private sector, with multiple sectors across the government and also obviously, civil society and self-care demands with the active participation of people,” said Sadana. “Health literacy is a fundamental catalyst for change to ensure individuals comprehend and act on credible health information, becoming active self-managers of their own health,” said Carrick. Experts at the launch also highlighted the need for pharmacies to be more involved in developing better policies, and for governments to spend more on ensuring that self-care is delivered through, not only OTC and literacy, but also nutrition, lifestyle, and affordable healthcare. Sadana said that in India, 70% of all healthcare costs are paid out of pocket, and 70% of that was on drugs. “If we’re going to have a system which encourages self-care, using products that are evidence-based and quality-controlled, we still need to have a way to ensure that those are covered [by the health system] if we actually want a vast swathe of the population to use them.” Image Credits: Tbel Abuseridze/ Unsplash. Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Self-Care Practices Can Save Millions and Alleviate Pressure on Health Systems 06/06/2022 Aishwarya Tendolkar In a world where health workers are scarce, self-care practices can drastically improve people’s quality of life and alleviate strain on health systems, but depend on a range of factors including patient literacy, fair prices and government stewardship. This is according to a one-of-a-kind global study demonstrating the value of self-care that was launched on the sidelines of recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families, and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and to cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider.” Current self-care activities around the world are generating annual savings of approximately $119 billion, along with saving 11 billion patient hours worldwide, according to the study. The study was produced by the Swiss-based Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF), which represents manufacturers and distributors of non-prescription medicines on all continents. Self-care cost-saving (source: Global Self-Care Federation report). Low-income countries lagging But the low-income countries are still lagging in implementing and reaping the benefits of self-care. “In low-income countries, about 65% of households that could not obtain essential health services had financial constraints,” said Dr Ritu Sadana, WHO Head of Ageing and Health Division of Universal Health Coverge (UHC), one of the panelists at the launch of the report. “This is more than triple the proportion of households who lack access to health services because they are just unavailable, which is 20%.” High-income countries are reaping the most benefits of self-care practices while the low-and middle-income countries are playing catch-up. With increased adoption of self-care, we will be seeing an additional $19.5 billion in annual cost savings related to the increased adoption of self-care by 2030, said Ben Carrick, Johnson and Johnson’s senior director of consumer policy. “If we think about the welfare benefits, it could be leading to an annual increase of $312 billion per year globally. These are significant benefits that are worth chasing and grasping,” Carrick told the launch. To estimate the true #ValueofSelfCare, we must first understand how it operates across different global contexts. Our 3 country groupings allow us to unlock such insights. 🌏 Read the report to learn the full scope of benefits that can be achieved:https://t.co/h5gTOOsgUl pic.twitter.com/ZMrINWpIax — The Global Self-Care Federation (@Selfcarefed_org) June 6, 2022 The study grouped 155 countries based on their GDP levels, and then gauged the self-care effects. In the high-income countries (Group A), self-care is already making an indispensable contribution to relieving the burden on healthcare systems. But it is in the low-and middle-income countries (Group B and C), where self-care can enable a person to work and not depend on welfare. “We don’t need more GDP; we need more welfare and this is also what this project is about, this is what self-care is about… to generate more welfare and not just be focused on figures and economic factors,” said Professor Uwe May, Dean of Studies at Fresenius University. He added that currently if people practised self-care instead of doing nothing about their health issues, 41 billion productive days can be gained on a global level. Self-care ‘only option’ in poor countries The study also found that health economic and pharmacoeconomic approaches deployed to assess the value of self-care cannot be transferred to lower-income regions where the infrastructure, socio-economic factors, and awareness is different. In addition, lack of access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and the prevalence of traditional medicines also has an impact on self-care options. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia, self-care is not an alternative care option, but is often “the only possible access to treatment for most individuals”, according to the report. In these countries, self-care does not translate into saving on doctors’ and specialists’ time. “This is where the welfare benefits are really the main opportunity because it isn’t saving physicians’ time and people don’t have access to the physicians,” said Carrick. “But if it means that they’re productive, they’re back at work and they’re able to look after families, then it’s those welfare and productivity benefits that really come into play.”. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the practice of self-care and the use of OTC products leads to current welfare savings of $123 per capita per year. The more the OTC use increases, the greater the individual and societal benefits can be realised through self-care, according to the study “We estimated that at least 142 million older persons, about 14% of older persons worldwide, are unable to meet some of their basic needs. So the issues around self-care for themselves or by their families or care providers is extremely important,” said Carrick. What do we need now? The report highlights the need for private-public partnerships, digital and healthcare literacy in people living in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and better parameters to gauge healthcare outcomes in a country. “We need strong stewardship by government, and to have really strong capacities in government institutions…so that they can lead and shape how we actually get things done with the private sector, with multiple sectors across the government and also obviously, civil society and self-care demands with the active participation of people,” said Sadana. “Health literacy is a fundamental catalyst for change to ensure individuals comprehend and act on credible health information, becoming active self-managers of their own health,” said Carrick. Experts at the launch also highlighted the need for pharmacies to be more involved in developing better policies, and for governments to spend more on ensuring that self-care is delivered through, not only OTC and literacy, but also nutrition, lifestyle, and affordable healthcare. Sadana said that in India, 70% of all healthcare costs are paid out of pocket, and 70% of that was on drugs. “If we’re going to have a system which encourages self-care, using products that are evidence-based and quality-controlled, we still need to have a way to ensure that those are covered [by the health system] if we actually want a vast swathe of the population to use them.” Image Credits: Tbel Abuseridze/ Unsplash. Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Climate Crisis Poses Serious Risk to Mental Health – WHO 03/06/2022 Raisa Santos Climate change poses serious risks to mental health and well-being, concluded a new World Health Organization policy brief, launched on Friday at the Stockholm+50 conference. Natural disasters such as floods, heatwaves, storms, and drought can pose a threat to mental health and psychosocial well-being, exacerbating emotional distress, anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior. WHO is therefore urging countries to include mental health and psychosocial support in their response to climate change. “The impacts of climate change are increasingly part of our daily lives, and there is very little dedicated mental health support available for people and communities dealing with climate-related hazards and long-term risk,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s Director of Environment, Climate Change, and Health. #ClimateChange poses serious risks to #MentalHealth and well-being – from emotional distress to anxiety, depression, grief, and suicidal behavior: new WHO policy brief https://t.co/ogdEP9iIG6 pic.twitter.com/VRqrMqoixr — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 3, 2022 The findings concur with a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in February of this year, which revealed that half of the world’s populations live in climate ‘danger zones’ that place “people’s health, lives, and livelihoods” at risk, and this can also include people’s mental health. The two-day conference, hosted by the government of Sweden and convened by the United Nations General Assembly on 2 – 3 June, drew together thousands of participants across government, civil society, and the private sector in an effort to spur urgent action for a healthy planet. The meeting also commemorates 50 years since the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, which made the environment a pressing issue for the first time. Climate change impact on mental health The mental health impacts of climate change are felt disproportionately around the world, with support services unequally distributed as well. While there are nearly 1 billion people living with mental health conditions, 3 out of 4 do not have access to needed services in low- and middle-income countries. A 2021 WHO survey found that out of 95 countries, only 9 have thus far included mental health and psychosocial support in their national health and climate change plans. Additionally, while the annual cost of common mental disorders is $1 trillion, only 2% of government health budgets are spent on mental health. These figures are all exacerbated by climate change. “The impact of climate change is compounding the already extremely challenging situation for mental health and health services globally,” said Devora Kestel, WHO Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Examples of how climate change can impact mental health include the loss of personally important places, loss of autonomy and control, and exposure to pollution, which is associated with increased risk for mental health conditions. The new policy brief recommends five important approaches for governments to address the mental health impacts of climate change: Integrate climate considerations with mental health programs Integrate mental health support with climate action Build upon global commitments Development of community-based approaches to reduce vulnerabilities to climate change, and Close the funding gap for mental health and psychosocial support “By ramping up mental health and psychosocial support within disaster risk reduction and climate action, countries can do more to help protect those most at risk,” said Kestel. Image Credits: Clay Kaufmann/ Unsplash. After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy
After Many Missed Opportunities, Oral Health Gets Long Overdue Attention from WHO 03/06/2022 Ihsane Ben Yahya & Greg Chadwick Dental services, including regular check-ups, were among the most disrupted essential health services during the COVID-19 lockdowns. People´s reticence to visit a dentist during normal times was exacerbated by fear of venturing into an open clinic or simply not being able to, due to restrictions. Dental hesitancy has always been around but over two years into the pandemic, it´s now a lot worse. This hesitancy is also echoed at the policy level. Oral health has, until very recently, been considered the “ugly duckling” of global health efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) has only ever passed a special resolution on oral health twice in its history: most recently, ironically, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The new global oral health strategy, approved by governments at 75th WHO World Health Assembly last week is a step in the right direction, and it is long overdue. 📣The WHO global #OralHealth strategy has officially been approved and adopted at the #WHA75 👏 FDI commends the strategy and tells @WHO that we are ready to support the development of the subsequent action plan and monitoring framework by 2023 ➡️ https://t.co/mTPgDRSB24 pic.twitter.com/MYf1nFap8e — FDI World Dental Federation (@fdiworlddental) May 28, 2022 Oral health is essential for overall health It´s a perfect time to double down on just why responding to the global oral health epidemic is in our broader (health) interests. Getting people back into dental clinics and protecting their oral health is essential to safeguarding their overall health, well-being, and quality of life. All those factors that can make people vulnerable to chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are equally risky for one´s oral health. High sugar consumption, harmful alcohol use and tobacco are just as bad for our bodies as they are for our mouths. The impact in pure numbers is alarming: there were some 3.5 billion cases of oral diseases and other oral conditions in 2017. For the last three decades, the combined global prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal (gum) disease and tooth loss has stood at 45% – higher than any other NCD. Ignoring the problem makes no sense, financial or otherwise. Worldwide, oral diseases accounted in 2015 for $ 357 billion in direct costs and US$ 188 billion in indirect costs. In the same year, $96.2 billion was spent on the treatment of oral diseases across the European Union, the third-highest total among NCDs, behind diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. “Without good oral health, you’re not healthy,” former US Surgeon-General David Satcher once said, and he was right. The largely siloed approach to dealing with oral health makes no policy sense either, especially when we consider the evidence. Junk food and tooth decay We know that bacteria and inflammation associated with periodontal disease are linked to cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and adverse effects in pregnancy. We also know that people living with diabetes experience improved blood glucose levels if their periodontal (gum) disease is managed correctly. Knowing what we know about poor oral health – that it is preventable and if addressed can help improve our overall health – only begs the question as to why more is not being done to integrate it into other NCD programmes? The pending ban on television and online advertising of junk food in the UK before 9pm is a great example of encouraging better diet. So too is the campaign by UK footballer Marcus Rashford to promote healthier school lunches. But they are missed opportunities. With forethought, both interventions could have included some key messages for children and parents around the connection between a healthy diet and good oral health. Future campaigns could better highlight the need to prioritize oral health promotion in schools, communities and workplaces as well as ensure access to the millions of people who cannot afford the basics, such as fluoridated toothpaste. We need to globally re-think how we talk about and tackle oral diseases. In the vast majority of countries, even essential oral health services are not part of universal health coverage. Oral diseases are noncommunicable diseases and need to be treated as such. Advocates have long argued that investment in prevention produces strong economic returns and saves millions of lives. COVID-19 has reinforced the huge economic and human cost of not doing so: people living with chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular were at much higher risk of becoming seriously ill, hospitalized, or dying from SARS‑CoV‑2. At the same time, the pandemic is just a microcosm of the bigger picture: our past failure to address oral disease in a substantive way and to view it as an NCD like any other. Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya Prof Ihsane Ben Yahya is the President of the FDI World Dental Federation and professor at the Dental University in Casablanca, Morocco. Dr Greg Chadwick Dr Greg Chadwick is the President-elect of FDI World Dental Federation and Dean at East Carolina University, School of Dental Medicine, United States. Image Credits: Caroline LM/ Unsplash, FDI World Dental Federation. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts