As the G-20 Health Ministers meeting takes place next week in Johannesburg, South Africa, a new global coalition is trying to put Alzheimer’s and dementia-related diseases on the priority list of the world’s major economies; and there’s one man who stands out as a driving force behind this movement. 

In his video “Leadership Lessons from Dancing Guy,” Derek Sivers demonstrates that one person dancing alone on the side of a hill—no matter how creative or talented they are—is not enough to create a movement. But when a second person joins in, dancing alongside the first, a movement begins to take shape. That’s when people start to say, “This is an idea worth joining.”

The real art, Sivers says, is recruiting that second person.

In the world of Alzheimer’s advocacy, that contagious “dancer” is George Vradenburg. Widely regarded as a global Alzheimer’s ambassador, Vradenburg has brought together leading scientific stakeholders, prestige investors from Silicon Valley to Goldman Sachs, and philanthropists —from red-state Texas to the G7 and G20. He has worked to link and scale efforts around the world to address what is fast becoming the globe’s most extensive and most expensive health epidemic: the brain health crisis.

George Vradenburg filming a documentary
George Vradenburg filming a documentary

“George Vradenburg has been a tremendous leader in advancing Alzheimer’s research not only in America but internationally,” said U.S. Senator Susan Collins (R‑Maine). “He recognizes that we cannot let Alzheimer’s be one of the defining diseases of our children’s generation as it has been for ours.”

Vradenburg and the Davos Alzheimer’s Collaborative (DAC), which he founded, work across high-, middle-, and low-income countries to collect data and drive innovation around brain health.

A life-course disease

People running
Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia are increasingly recognized as a life-course disease – often preventable through healthier lifestyles and environments.

After years of exploration, Vradenburg’s message is all about embracing the fact that Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia are life-course diseases, as compared to something that is suddenly and surprisingly diagnosed at age 65. It’s shaped by maternal health, education, nutrition, lifestyles, environments — and all the other factors contributing to healthy development from the womb to midlife and beyond.

It’s also linked to mental and cardiovascular health. Risks to these are also precursors to Alzheimer’s.

As a result, DAC has gradually expanded its focus to encompass the wide range of issues driving overall brain health. Vradenburg’s legacy, now 82, may be that the world comes to understand this broader view.

The ‘Brain House’ – built for the DAC series in DAVOS. After that, the event took to the road.

In January, DAC hosted its first “Brain House” series at the 2025 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland; it was at the WEF in Davos in 2020 that DAC was first launched just as COVID was closing in on the world.

Following that three-day event, the Davos ‘Brain House’ model embarked on a globe-trotting series around the world. It has brought together scientists and experts from Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas, with philanthropists, politicians and business leaders in an effort to build a global movement.

A new U.S. ‘brain capital’

Brain capital session at Texas Medical Center, Houston, May 22 with Vradenburg in audience on far-right. ‘The real art is recruiting that second person.’

The first stop was Houston. In May, Business Collaborative for Brain Health catalyzed the powerful Texas medical research community as well as the leading political and business personalities at the second event in the ‘Brain House’ series in Houston, home to the Texas Medical Center, the largest medical complex in the world. In May, it brought together stakeholders on the sidelines of the G7 meetings of health and finance ministers in Canada. The initiative now heads to South Africa next week.

Government cuts under the Trump administration left a mark on the American healthcare landscape. Health research funding priorities have continued to shift, especially in red states, where support for Trump remains strong. Yet despite the political headwinds, Vradenburg’s success in co-organizing a high-level conference in Texas (May 21-22)  was met by equal amounts of enthusiasm among the state’s political and business elite.

The economic as well as social problems associated with Alzheimer’s and dementia are undeniable, as Vradenburg pointed out in Houston and everywhere else he goes: “Increasing brain disorders around the world are increasing costs — social costs and economic — to governments around the world, and so governments are now being motivated actually to invest in the solution.”

At the Texas event, titled “Brain Capital: The New Competitive Edge in a Shifting Economy,” state officials elaborated on the proposal to establish the Dementia Prevention Research Institute of Texas (DPRIT). This $3 billion initiative, championed by Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, will go before voters in November. The institute would channel new investments into research on the diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as dementia and Alzheimer’s, while also advancing efforts to prevent them before symptoms begin.

Brain-related conditions make up roughly one-third of Texas’s total disease burden. Research presented at the summit suggested that improving brain health could boost the state’s GDP by as much as $260 billion. The findings are the result of a joint modeling exercise by the Business Collaborative for Brain Health and McKinsey Health Institute.

In an interview with the Houston Business Journal, Vradenburg drew a direct comparison to the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT), which since its founding in 2007 has become the nation’s second largest public funder of cancer research after the National Institutes of Health Cancer Institute.

“Royalty flies in from around the world to go to MD Anderson,” Vradenburg said, referring to the University of Texas cancer center that is CPRIT’s flagship. “Imagine if you had that for brain health.”

Improving workforce productivity

Vradenburg at the Calgary Brain Economy Summit on the G7 margins

The Texas meeting concluded with a set of policy recommendations aimed at strengthening brain health research systems. The following month, those recommendations were carried forward to a side event in Calgary on the margins of the G7 series of meetings over May and June hosted by Canada in the province of Alberta.

The Canada Brain Economy Summit focused on how the world’s most advanced economies are neglecting brain health as one of their most valuable assets. A “Brain Economy Declaration” asserted that brain capital is the missing link – and the reason for sluggish productivity, labor market strain, and other threats to long-term economic resilience.

The declaration calls on G7 leaders to adopt a policy roadmap for brain health through the 2026 G7 Leaders’ Summit in France – tasking health and finance ministers with jointly crafting a national strategy that integrates policy and investment in brain health. The recommendations also call for the formation of G7+ working groups to share scalable solutions and build partnerships across countries.

Said Vradenburg at the Calgary event: “No nation can afford to ignore the multi-trillion-dollar cost of unaddressed brain disorders. This is higher than the annual GDP of Germany, France, Italy, and the UK combined. The G7 has a unique opportunity to solve this crisis, joining the private sector and civil society to create a global brain economy.”

“Governments are treating human brain health as an economic cost, not as an asset that can be harnessed for significant competitive and societal advantage,” added Jennie Z. Young, executive director of the Canadian Brain Research Strategy. “There is momentum across all sectors in Canada and other nations. But without G7 leadership, we won’t unlock the full economic potential that can be harnessed by investing in brain capital initiatives.”

It’s hoped that the 2026 G7, hosted by France, will yield a formal declaration on brain health, in a drive led by European institutions such as the Paris Brain Institute. The Brain Institute gathers more than 700 researchers and clinicians in 1000 m2 of space dedicated to start-up incubation.

“Momentum is already building toward a brain economy that puts brain health and brain skills at the core of economic growth and societal resilience,” observed Erica Coe, executive director of McKinsey Health Institute, in an interview with Health Policy Watch. “As AI reshapes the world, thriving will require us to nurture the skills that remain uniquely human, like creativity, critical thinking, and adaptability. This is about more than health—it’s about unlocking human potential at scale.”

Accelerating the push for international cooperation

Stephen Tollman, Alzheimer’s expert at the University of Witterswand, South Africa, talks about neglected brain health needs in Africa at EBC event, moderated by Vradenburg, in New York City. To his left is Angela Apeagyei, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation and Sarah Hoit, Social Impact Partners.

Then in September, stakeholders gathered yet again in New York City at a three-day event hosted by the European Brain Council (EBC) on the margins of the United Nations General Assembly’s High Level Meeting on Noncommunicable Diseases.

“The future of brain health depends on international cooperation,” said Frédéric Destrebecq, EBC executive director at the event, sponsored by the Global Brain Coalition. “We are bringing together voices from science, policy, civil society, and industry to shape a global response to one of the century’s greatest health challenges.”

In the UNGA High Level Declaration on Noncommunicable Diseases, promoting better prevention and treatment of NCDs, dementia is officially recognized by UN member states as a major noncommunicable disease for the first time ever.

The draft declaration was supposed to be approved at September’s High Level Meeting (HLM)  after receiving overwhelming support from most UN member states – but a last minute United States move blocked its consensus approval. It will now go before the General Assembly for a formal vote, later in this year’s session.

Despite the technical delays, the UN’s recognition of dementia as a leading noncommunicable disease will be “a historic step forward for hundreds of millions of families worldwide,” Vradenburg asserted, shortly after the HLM event. “Brain health costs are a major challenge to nations worldwide and thus demand a global response.”

Next stop G20, South Africa

Next Tuesday, on 4 November, DAC will hold yet another brain health side event – this time in Johannesburg on the margins of the G20 Health Ministerial and G20 Joint Finance and Health Ministerial Meetings. This comes just ahead of the G20 Summit, 22-23 November.

The day-long G20 side event features a lineup of prominent brain health researchers from institutions in South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, Cameroon, and Egypt, as well as globally.

George at Nairobi Nature Conference with Zul Merali of AKU and Vaibhav Narayan of DAC
Vradenburg at a 2024 conference on Alzheimer’s in Nairobi, co-sponsored with the journal Nature. To his right are Zul Merali of Agha Khan University and Vaibhav Narayan of DAC.

It will also showcase recommendations from the recent Nature Medicine publication, “Strengthening Africa’s Brain Health and Economic Resilience,” co-authored by over two dozen experts from around the world, led by University College London and DAC.

The Nature report presents a ‘6×5 Plan’ to prepare Africa for a demographic transition to an older population, including a framework for globally scalable strategies to address brain health from early childhood and across the life cycle — including through education, better workforce health, and more digital innovation.  It’s based on projections that in Sub-Saharan Africa, the number of adults over the age of 60 will triple by 2050, from 69 million in 2017 to around 226 million. 

Insights from the Texas, G7 and G20-based discussions will inform the next round of World Economic Forum (WEF) Brain Economy Action Forum and contribute to a special report slated for release at the January 2026 WEF Annual Meeting in Davos. That meeting will also unveil a long-awaited global roadmap for building the brain economy.

From Texas to Africa – putting brain health on the map

Deaths rates per 100,000 baased on WHO data (2020) shows the highest incidence in developed countries, where populations are older. But developing country populations are now aging more rapidly.

From Texas to Johannesburg, this year’s events are already part of a carefully planned strategy laid out by Vradenburg and other key DAC movers and shakers to plant the seeds of a global movement to make brain health a top public health priority.

And there’s a good reason to do so.

Today, more than 55 million people are living with Alzheimer’s disease, and that number is expected to soar to 152 million by 2050. Current data ranks Alzheimer’s as the seventh leading cause of death worldwide.

Beyond the human toll, brain-related conditions are costing the global economy more than $1 trillion each year in lost productivity. By 2030, that figure is projected to skyrocket to nearly $16 trillion.

Roughly 60% of people living with dementia reside in low- and middle-income countries. In sub-Saharan Africa alone, an estimated 2.13 million people were affected as of 2015. That number is projected to reach 7.62 million by 2050 on the continent. It’s no different in the world’s richest country either.

“Alzheimer’s disease is one of the greatest public health challenges of our time,” Senator Collins  told Health Policy Watch. “Nearly 7 million Americans are living with the disease, and that number is soaring as our overall population grows older and lives longer. It touches so many families, including my own, and it is devastating not only emotionally but also economically.”

From business leader to global health advocate

Vradenburg’s own family history is also part of the DAC story – and what transformed him from a successful corporate lawyer for big media outfits like Fox, AOL, and CBS into global health advocate, beginning nearly two decades ago.

His late wife’s grandmother died of senility, “which is what they called it back in the day,” he recalled in an interview with Health Policy Watch. His late wife’s mother was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s and experienced chronic hallucinations as her health declined prior to her death in 1992, which is likely what shook Vradenburg most. So he and his wife, Trish, an author, playwright and journalist, had already become deeply involved in the battle against Alzheimer’s in 2005, and long before Trish’s sudden death from cardiac arrest in mid-April, 2017.

George and his late wife Trish Vradenburg featured in The Washingtonian in 2012. Their public battle against Alzheimer’s began already in 2005.

“It is quite clear that there is a familial or genetic risk factor,” Vradenburg says of the family history. His brother-in-law was also living with an advanced stage of the disease until his death in 2024. “If we don’t move faster against this disease over the next 45 years than we have in the last 45 years, it won’t be just my kids — it will be my grandchildren. It’s just intolerable to me to sit here and see what’s happened to my family and not do anything about it. You can get angry, but it’s better to turn that anger into action.”

Still, he emphasizes that his efforts soon went far beyond the personal domain.

“I’m working for the millions of other people around the world who are experiencing the same thing, too,” he said.

Vradenburg first raised the idea of focusing on brain health in 2006 with Republican lawmaker Newt Gingrich, who understood that “this was going to be the sinkhole of the 21st century. And that if we weren’t to get at it, prevent it, or slow it, it would bankrupt America,” Vradenburg related.

Gingrich went on to lead a study group that, over two years, produced a recommendation for a national strategic plan. That plan was later updated and adopted on January 4, 2011, when President Barack Obama signed into law the National Alzheimer’s Project Act.

As a result, national spending on Alzheimer’s research has jumped from $400 million to $3.8 billion annually.

In 2011, Vradenburg helped launch the Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer’s. A year later, he and Trish co-founded Us against Alzheimer’s, the seedling of DAC. By 2019, Alzheimer’s was finally moving into the global health agenda, and cited at that year’s World Economic Forum as a challenge on par with infectious diseases. At the 2020 WEF, the Davos Alzheimer’s Collaborative (DAC) was officially launched, beginning full operations in 2021.

“So, I’ve turned from a lawyer to a patient advocate,” Vradenburg said in an interview.

New Alzheimer’s drugs and diagnostics

Historically, genetic analysis of dementia-related diseaes has focused overwhelmingly on white Europeans; leading to an incomplete understanding of the way Alzheimer’s disease impacts Africans and Asians where populations are rapidly aging.

The rising chorus of political, public and civil society advocacy around Alzheimer’s and other dementia-related diseases has already helped spur the development of several new drugs; including two new recently-approved treatments for early-phase Alzheimer’s, donanemab  and lecanemab, which help slow disease progression. A vaccine is also under development, with more than half a dozen companies currently testing candidates in early-stage clinical trials.

At the same time, new diagnostic tools are being evaluated to catch Alzheimer’s earlier and more affordably. The goal is to move beyond costly PET scans and MRIs to a simple, widely accessible blood test.

Through partnerships with health systems in over 20 countries, DAC has supported the strengthening of diagnostic capabilities as well as research to improve early, accurate detection.  An Early Detection Blueprint offering health systems recommendations for planning and implementing programmes that monitor cognitive impairment is now a go-to global resource. Collaborations across 14 countries are supporting the improved deployment of related diagnostic tools.  Another multi-country Global Cohorts research initiative is underway to better understand the disease and its progression amongst diverse populations and settings.

DAC Global Cohort research programme is supporting collaborations adding to understanding Alzheimer’s disease heterogeneity in diverse settings.

Along with affluent nations, developing countries are also stepping up to the challenge now. India recently announced the launch of the world’s most extensive brain health action plan. The initiative includes a network of brain health clinics providing holistic care for individuals suffering from neurological disorders or at risk of developing such disorders.

Kenya has emerged as another pathfinder in the fight against Alzheimer’s, spearheading a five-year national strategy that includes six major initiatives to strengthen investment in brain health. The plan addresses long-overlooked gaps in the system and reflects a broader recognition of the country’s rising health priorities.

Meanwhile, the European Union announced a Youth Mental Health Plan and created the European Partnership for Brain Health. Member states jointly committed funding to build a continent-wide neuroscience ecosystem, with a budget of approximately €500 million.

Orchestrating a global movement

In Armenia, health workers deployed in mobile clinics to remote areas screen people for cognitive impairment in 2022 as part of a DAC-supported cohort of early detection pilot projects.

While Vradenburg doesn’t claim a lot of credit for himself, his colleagues and peers attribute his methodical and lawyer-like guidance for building an organisation that can leverage significant political attention – and help change the conversation around how Alzheimer’s, dementia and related brain health issues are approached.

From influencing policy in Texas to the G7, G20 and UN agendas, the aim is to reframe Alzheimer’s as not just a personal or medical research issue, but as an economic, social, and policy challenge. An issue that crosses the lines of bitterly divided societies, including rich and poor countries in the global north and south, it is a rare unifier in an era of global and regional discord.

“He puts a lot of his own personal wealth into this, and he works harder than anyone I know,” said Drew Holzapfel, chief operating officer of DAC. “I always tell people I can’t imagine trying to keep up with him earlier in his career — because he’s absolutely tireless in pursuing this goal. In addition to investing his own money, he also puts his personal connections into it, creating a network of people who might not otherwise be involved.

“George would be the first to say he can’t take credit for everything, because it takes a lot of people to accomplish what’s been done. But in my mind, he’s absolutely been a central figure in it all,” added Holzapfel.

And at the age of 82, Vradenburg is still pushing the world to move faster, think bigger, and act smarter, proving that one man, driven by personal challenges, can change the course of global health.

“Coupled with the decline in global productivity and the rise of AI, investment in human intelligence and brain capital is critical to the material well-being of people everywhere,” he declares. “DAC intends to help lead the advance.”

Image Credits: Courtesy, Gabin Vallet, Daniel Kraft/DAC, DAC , Hotchkiss Brain Institute , E. Fletcher/HP Watch , DAC, Worldlifeexpetancy.com, The Washingtonian, DAC/Martin et al, 2019, DAC .

A researcher involved in clinical trial of R21, a vaccine against malaria.

Although 18% of the world’s population lives in Africa, only 3% of clinical trials are conducted on the continent – and the ambition is to increase this percentage to 15% by 2035.

But this requires substantial improvements across several aspects – including more innovative trial designs and better use of digital tools – the subject of a recent webinar hosted by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA) as part of its African Regulatory Conference.  

Several organisations are working to improve Africa’s ability to host trials.

The Africa Clinical Research Network (ACRN) supports the implementation of high-quality clinical trials by networking with researchers, training, and building capacity, says chief-of-staff Dr Romina Mariano.

“Our approach is focused on the trial quality across sites, the acceleration of study startup recruitment, and building long-term capacity and sustainability,” she told the webinar.

“Over 70% of oncology studies in the US failed to meet enrollment targets on time. Costs are rocketing, and Africa, by contrast, offers rapidly expanding young populations, rapidly expanding healthcare infrastructure and increasing regulatory maturity. So for global sponsors, Africa is essential to solving today’s trial bottlenecks,” she added.

ACRN functions currently as a trial site management organisation, offering “modular trial execution services” that include laboratory services and logistics.

It applies a “digital-first approach” with a “robust digital operating system” including  AI-enabled features and pharmacovigilance.

The Africa Clinical Research Network (ACRN) chief-of-staff Dr Romina Mariano.

Focus on regulators 

Kwasi Nyarko heads the World Health Organization (WHO) initiative, Advancing Clinical Trials Excellence in Africa (abbreviated as AVAREF).

AVAREF focuses on improving the skills of national regulators to oversee clinical trials, including ethics oversight.

It is currently working on a pilot with 16 countries, each of which has availed three reviewers for training, said Nyarko.

However, he says that the lack of clinical trials makes it difficult for the reviewers to get practical experience.

Currently, the continent’s approach is “fragmented”, and AVAREF is working towards a situation where trial approval by one country in the network means it can be approved in all the other countries.

“Traditional trials tend to be expensive. Cost is prohibitive,” said Nyarko.  “So we are beginning to see new, innovative trial designs using digital tools.”

“We have a digital working group that’s looking at the IT system that we need and the platform is actually being developed, courtesy of the Gates Foundation and CEPI [Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations].”

“We want to ensure that reviewers from multiple sites can work on a similar platform and review dossiers.”

The European Medicines Agency, the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada are assisting AVAREF.

AVAREF’s Dr Kwasi Nyarko.

Showcasing African trials

The South African-based tech company nuvoteQ, which develops software products for clinical and pharmaceutical research organisations, has set up an online platform called the Clinical Trials Community (CTC) Africa.

CEO Adriaan Kruger said CTC aims to attract investment in African clinical trials by showcasing the continent’s clinical trialists and research sites. 

It is an “interactive platform” that provides a registry of sites, data on site feasibility, and access to country-specific regulatory and ethics information to make it easier for sponsors to find and partner with African research locations. 

“We have a database of about 30,000 trials that we know of, and within the registry where these trials are listed, we have fairly clean data,” said Kruger.

Adriaan Kruger, CEO of nuvoteQ.

WHO forum

Dr Vasee Moorthy, who leads the WHO’s work on clinical trials, told the webinar that the WHO had recently launched a Global Clinical Trials Forum to strengthen the trial environment and infrastructure.

“It includes 27 organisations and is actively seeking more African participants,” said Moorthy.

The forum follows from a 2022 World Health Assembly resolution on strengthening clinical trials.

The webinar also heard case studies about innovative trials. GSK used a Facebook-based application integrated with WhatsApp to collect data about the adverse effects of medicines from patients in Brazil’s Amazon region.

While the study showed that the technology enabled the follow-up of adverse events and pregnancies, the study was limited due to a small sample size and low response rate.

Roche’s Recovery trial, the largest COVID-19 treatment study, was designed to address the urgent need for effective treatments for COVID-19 while minimising the burden on frontline hospital staff. Using real-world evidence from electronic health records, the study demonstrated the effectiveness of Tocilizumab in treating COVID-19.

Speakers stressed the importance of innovative trial designs, particularly in low-income settings. The use of free digital tools such as WhatsApp are particularly important.

The webinar, Innovative clinical trial designs and digital technologies, was the third of a four-part online African Regulatory Conference hosted by IFPMA. The final webinar is on 25 November, and focuses on streamlining regulatory and ethics approval for clinical trials. Anyone who is interested can register.

Image Credits: University of Oxford/ Tom Wilkinson.

Extreme heat, wildfires, disease and air pollution claim record death toll as global response moves in the wrong direction. 

Climate change is claiming millions of lives annually through extreme heat, air pollution, wildfires and the spread of deadly infectious diseases, according to the most comprehensive assessment to date of the links between climate change and health.

The ninth annual Lancet Countdown report, authored by 128 experts from 71 academic institutions and UN agencies worldwide, reveals that 13 of 20 indicators tracking health risks and impacts from climate change reached concerning new records in the latest year for which data is available.

The findings arrive as the world exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures for the first time in 2024. Greenhouse gas emissions rose to record levels as the lack of a global response to climate change sets the world on track for a catastrophic 2.7°C to 3.7°C of warming by the end of the century.

“We’re really worried, to be very honest with you. We’re really, really worried from the scientific perspective, because we have the data,” said Marina Romanello, executive director of the Lancet Countdown at University College London, describing this year’s report as “a bleak and undeniable picture of the devastating health harms reaching all corners of the world.”

“There’s no denying how the situation is, how policies and actions are not going in line with what the evidence shows,” Romanello said. “We’re seeing millions of deaths that are occurring needlessly every year because of our persistent fossil fuel dependence, because of our delay in mitigating climate change, and our delays in adaptation to the climate change that cannot be avoided.”

The 2025 Lancet report found that the majority of climate and health indicators are worsening. Many set historic records.

The Lancet findings add to the chorus of urgency surrounding the upcoming climate summit, COP30, in the Brazilian Amazon city of Belém. As the world drags its feet, science indicates the original call of the Paris agreement to limit warming to 1.5°C is already dead.

“Let’s recognise our failure,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres told the Guardian this week. “The truth is that we have failed to avoid an overshooting above 1.5°C in the next few years.”

Without immediate course correction, the mounting death toll documented in the Lancet report represents only the beginning of a health catastrophe that will claim tens of millions more lives as temperatures continue to rise.

“Overshooting is now inevitable,” the UN chief said. “Going above 1.5°C has devastating consequences.”

Overheat

The lighter grey indicates heatwave days that would have been experienced without human-caused warming, and
the darker grey indicates the total exposure to heatwave days.

As the planet warms, human health is caught in the crossfire. Heat exposure claimed an estimated 546,000 lives annually in the most recent decade of data, marking the first time researchers have quantified the absolute mortality toll from rising temperatures. 

On average, 84% of the heatwave days that people experienced between 2020 and 2024 would not have occurred without climate change.

“That’s approximately one heat-related death every minute of the year,” said Ollie Jay, professor of heat and health at the University of Sydney and co-chair of the report’s first working group.

Jay warned of approaching physiological limits beyond which human survival becomes impossible. 

“One of the things that we’re really worried about in the heat and health space is reaching these physiological tipping points where combined temperature and humidity that people are presented are actually not survivable for a given level of exposure time, and we’re reaching, potentially reaching, these limits in different parts of the world at an alarming rate,” he said.

Map showing the expansion of extreme heat zones in a business-as-usual climate scenario.

Jay’s concern aligns with other independent projections. Modelling published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found the planet could see a greater temperature rise in the next 50 years than in the previous 6,000. 

Extreme heat zones like the Sahara – now covering less than 1% of land on earth – could expand to nearly 20%, potentially pushing one in three people on the planet outside the climate niche humans have lived in for millennia. 

Emerging data suggest these physiological tipping points are “actually cooler and drier than we previously thought,” Jay noted, meaning vast regions could become uninhabitable far sooner than anticipated.

Annual number of months of extreme drought on average in 1951–1960 (A) and 2024 (B).

With heat comes drought. Extreme drought affected a record 61% of global land area in 2024, which is 299% above the 1950s average, threatening food and water security. 

The higher number of heatwave days and drought months in 2023 was associated with 123.7 million more people experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity across 124 countries analysed, compared with 1981-2010, the report found. 

The economic toll is escalating in parallel. Weather-related extreme events in 2024 caused $304 billion in global economic losses, a 59% increase from the 2010-14 annual average.

Heat exposure resulted in 639 billion potential work hours lost in 2024, totalling $1.09 trillion in potential losses— almost 1% of the global economy.

For countries with low human development indices, the losses approached 6% of GDP, undermining the economic foundations on which health systems depend. 

“Around the world we are seeing these multiple health impacts compound each other to trigger a cascade of harms that undermine the very social and economic foundations taht support people’s health,” said report co-author Stella Hartinger,

“It’s clear that these health harms are the price we are paying for the consistent failure of global leaders to deliver the action needed to combat climate change and protect health–a price paid most severely by vulnerable countries that have contributed the least to the crisis.”

Fire and Smoke 

Annual mortality rates attributable to human-generated PM2·5 exposure from 2007 to 2022 by fuel, sector, and HDI level.

The report attributes 2.52 million deaths in 2022 to outdoor air pollution from fossil fuel combustion, with the transport sector the biggest single contributor globally from petrol use. 

Household use of dirty fuels and technologies across 65 countries resulted in 2.3 million deaths in 2022, deaths that could be avoided through transitioning to clean renewable energy.

“The evidence could not be clearer. Climate change is taking a horrific toll on people’s health worldwide, on top of the millions of preventable deaths every year from air pollution,” said Nina Renshaw, head of health at the Clean Air Fund.

Wildfire smoke claimed a record 154,000 lives in 2024, a 36% increase from baseline years. Research increasingly shows wildfire smoke is more toxic than typical air pollution due to its high black carbon content, with emerging links to dementia and other long-term health impacts.

“2024 saw record deaths from air pollution from wildfires driven by climate change, showing the urgency of curbing emissions to stop this insane death spiral,” Renshaw said. “Action on super pollutants, like black carbon and ground-level ozone, is our emergency brake to decisively slow global warming.”

Mosquitoes on the move

Climate change is expanding the climate niche that supports mosquitoes carrying dengue and other infectious diseases.

The changing climate is also expanding the geographic range where deadly infectious diseases can spread, the Lancet report found.

The transmission potential for dengue by its two main mosquito vectors increased by 48.5% and 11.6% respectively from 1951-60 to 2015-24, contributing to the 7.6 million dengue cases reported globally in early 2024.

“Finding mosquitoes in Iceland cannot be good news,” Romanello said, referring to recent detections linked to rising temperatures. 

The appearance of disease-carrying mosquitoes near the Arctic Circle is the tip of a rapidly warming iceberg reshaping the geographic boundaries of vector-borne diseases, potentially exposing millions of previously protected populations to infections like malaria, dengue and Zika for the first time.

“The health threats of climate change, once again, are breaking new records,” Romanello said. “They broke records the year before, and they set new record this year.”

“What worries us most is not just a single indicator, a single threat increasing, but that all these threats are increasing in parallel, and they often compound each other.”

Political will evaporates as crisis deepens

Fifteen countries allocated more resources to fossil fuel net subsidies than their entire national health budgets.

The global response is moving in the wrong direction even as health impacts accelerate. The report found that 12 of 20 indicators monitoring climate and health action worsened in the latest year of data, with six showing reversal of previous progress.

Mentions of health and climate change by governments in their annual UN General Assembly statements declined from 62% in 2021 to 30% in 2024.

“If we remain locked into fossil fuel dependence, health systems, cooling infrastructure, and disaster response capacities will soon be overwhelmed, putting the health and lives of the world’s 8 billion people further at risk,” said Nadia Ameli, Lancet Countdown working group 4 co-chair. “Each unit of greenhouse gases emitted drives up the costs and challenges of adaptation.”

The engagement that remains is mostly driven by countries least responsible for but most affected by climate change, while engagement is falling among some of the world’s greatest greenhouse gas emitters and the private sector.

The world’s largest fossil fuel companies continue to expand planned production despite the climate crisis.

The 100 largest oil and gas companies have production strategies that put them on track to exceed their share of production consistent with 1.5°C of heating by 189% in 2040, up from 183% in March 2024, the Commission found.

Private bank lending to fossil fuel sector activities surged 29% to $611 billion in 2024, exceeding green sector lending by 15%. Some 73 of 87 countries reviewed provided net explicit fossil fuel subsidies in 2023, allocating nearly $1 trillion in direct support.

Including indirect subsidies, that figure rises to over $7 trillion, according to the International Monetary Fund — more than governments spend annually on education and about two-thirds of what they spend on healthcare.

Fifteen countries allocated more funds to net fossil fuel subsidies than to national health budgets, according to the report.

“If we keep on enabling this expansion of fossil fuels, we know that a healthy future is not possible and that all of these environmental determinants of health will get much worse very, very fast,” Romanello said. “The destruction to lives and livelihoods will continue to escalate until we end our fossil fuel addiction.”

World heading for catastrophic warming

Current policies presently in place around the world are projected to result in about 2.7°C, according to Climate Action Tracker.

The backsliding documented in the Lancet report means the health impacts breaking records today will only intensify as the world continues to burn.

The analysis of nationally determined contributions from the 64 countries that have submitted updated pledges shows projected emissions in 2035 are only 10.2% below 2019 levels, far short of the 60% reduction needed to limit warming to 1.5°C, according to a synthesis report released Tuesday by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

“The scale and severity of the climate crisis has never been clearer,” said Simon Stiell, UNFCCC executive secretary. “Brutal climate-driven droughts, floods, storms and wildfires are hitting every nation harder each year, wrecking millions of lives and gutting national budgets.”

“This wider picture, though still incomplete, shows global emissions falling by around 10% by 2035.”

That figure, however, includes commitments from the United States under the Biden administration. In January, President Donald Trump told the UN General Assembly that climate change was “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion.”

“If you don’t get away from this green scam, your country is going to fail,” Trump said, dismissing decades of scientific research. 

“All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong. They were made by stupid people that have cost their countries fortunes and given those same countries no chance for success.”

“It’s nonsense,” the US President said. “I’ve been right about everything.”

The US President has repeatedly decried climate change as a “hoax” and committed to repeal his predecessor’s climate targets.

With the US commitment now void, the actual projected emissions reduction falls to approximately 6%, making the gap to 1.5°C even wider. 

“The road we have to travel between today and 1.5 is incredibly steep,” Guterres said in the Guardian interview, urging nations to “change course now.” 

The world’s other largest emitter, China, has been roundly criticized by scientists and experts for continuing to increase its emissions, which surpassed the total historical emissions of Europe last year.

“We already have the solutions at hand to avoid a climate catastrophe,” Romanello said. “Rapidly phasing out fossil fuels remains the most powerful lever to slow climate change and protect lives. Shifting to healthier, climate-friendly diets and more sustainable agricultural systems would massively cut pollution, greenhouse gases and deforestation, potentially saving over ten million lives a year.”

Missing trillions

The Azerbaijani Presidency of COP29 hailed a breakthrough in recruiting more global finance at COP29. Developing states called the outcome a “betrayal”.

The UNFCCC synthesis found that 88% of countries included unconditional elements in their climate pledges, while 67% included more ambitious conditional elements dependent on access to enhanced financial resources and technology transfer. 

These conditional targets mean that many countries, especially poorer nations in the path of climate destruction, will only implement more aggressive emissions cuts if wealthier countries provide the climate finance needed to support the transition.

A total of 52% of countries reported climate finance needs in the range of $1.97 trillion to $1.98 trillion, comprising $1.07 trillion to $1.08 trillion identified as support needed from international sources.

“An equitable global transition, where every country benefits from clean energy and climate resilience, requires clear policies and plans, across every country and every sector, and more support for many nations, especially those that did least to cause this global crisis,” Stiell said.

Negotiators agreed to a new collective quantified goal of only $300 billion by 2035 at COP29 in Baku, less than a third of the identified need and payable over a decade rather than immediately. 

The least developed nations called the figure a “betrayal,” noting that amount won’t be reached for decades, when the impacts of climate change and needs are far more severe and expensive.

“The poorest countries in the world are already spending more on debt service than on healthcare, education, and infrastructure combined,” said Jess Beagley, policy lead at the Global Climate and Health Alliance.

“It’s clearer than ever that the level of finance agreed to in the new goal is insufficient to deal with the devastating health consequences of climate change,” she added. “Continuing to raise ambition is a matter of life and death.”

Debt servicing costs were 20% higher than total energy investment in Africa between 2014 and 2022, according to the IAEA.

Some countries allocate over 80% of government revenue to debt servicing, leaving only 20% for social services and development.

Yet international climate finance comes predominantly as loans rather than grants, creating a vicious cycle where countries need finance to implement climate action but lack the fiscal space to take on more debt, while climate impacts further erode their economic capacity. 

The debt trap leaves health systems chronically underfunded and unable to cope with rising climate-related disease burdens, heat casualties and disaster response needs.

“A political shift towards reduced foreign aid support from some of the world’s wealthiest countries further restricts financial support for climate change action, leaving all populations increasingly unprotected,” Romanello said. “There is no time left for further delay.”

Image Credits: Mike Newbry/ Unsplash.

Displaced families shelter at a gathering site in El Fasher in northern Darfur in August 2025.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is “appalled and deeply shocked by reports of the tragic killing of more than 460 patients and their companions at Saudi Maternity Hospital in El Fasher in Sudan”, said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Gunmen attacked the hospital – the only one that is partially functioning in the town – on Tuesday, reportedly killing 460 patients and their companions. Four doctors, a nurse and a pharmacist were also abducted.

Healthworkers said that the gunmen, from the rebel Rapid Support Forces (RSF), burst into the hospital and opened fire without warning, WION reports.  The RSF have been engaged in war with the Sudanese military since April 2023.

“All attacks on healthcare must stop immediately and unconditionally,” said Tedros. WHO has verified 285 attacks on healthcare in Sudan with at least 1,204 deaths and over 400 injuries of health workers and patients, since the start of the conflict.

“The WHO said that there is a “rapidly worsening crisis in North Darfur’s El Fasher, where escalating violence, siege conditions and rising hunger and disease are killing civilians, including children, and collapsing an already-fragile health system”.

The region of El Fasher has been cut off from humanitarian aid since February, and “malnutrition is rising sharply, especially among children and pregnant women, weakening immunity and heightening vulnerability to cholera, malaria, and other infectious diseases”, said WHO.

Over 260,000 people are trapped in the region with almost no access to food, clean water, or medical care. Many civilians fleeing the RSF takeover have sought safety in Tawila, some 60km from the regional capital of El Fasher, which fell to the RSF a few days ago. It was the last remaining government-controlled city in the region.

 Over 100,000 more people are expected to move to Tawila in the coming days and weeks, adding to the 575,000 already displaced from El Fasher who are sheltering there and other areas. 

“Many of the displaced are women and unaccompanied children facing acute shortages of shelter, protection, food, water, and health care,” said the WHO.

‘Abduction, killing and maiming, and sexual violence’

“No child is safe,” UNICEF chief Catherine Russell told UN News. “While the full scale of the impact remains unclear due to widespread communications blackouts, the estimated 130,000 children in El Fasher are at a high risk of grave rights violations, with reports of abduction, killing and maiming, and sexual violence.”

UNICEF is calling for an immediate ceasefire to stop the violence, safe, unimpeded humanitarian access, the protection of civilians – especially children – and guaranteed safe passage for families seeking refuge, in line with international humanitarian law.

Despite access restrictions to El Fasher, WHO teams are working around the clock to keep health services running where possible, particularly in areas where people displaced by insecurity arrive.

Twenty metric tons of medicines and emergency kits, including supplies for cholera and management of severe acute malnutrition with medical complications, are being moved from Nyala to Tawila to support medical and rapid-response teams providing care for displaced people, said WHO.

WHO reports that it is also working with health partners at reception sites in Korma, located between El Fasher and Tawila, to stabilise critically ill and injured people and facilitate referrals to Tawila.

“WHO calls for an immediate end to hostilities in El Fasher and all of Sudan; for the protection of civilians, humanitarian workers, and health care; and safe, rapid, and unimpeded humanitarian access to deliver lifesaving aid.”

‘Profound shock’

Five local members of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) were also killed this week while working as volunteers in Bara, North Kordofan state.

“We received this news with profound shock and outrage, and we condemn in the strongest possible terms this horrific and senseless act,” said the ICRC in a statement.

UN’s head of humanitarian operations in Sudan, Denise Brown, told UN News after recently visiting the Darfur region before the fall of the city this week, that it’s proving hard to verify information from the stricken city, but all atrocities needed to be accounted for so that “justice can be served”.

 

Image Credits: UNICEF.

A UN Women team assesses the earthquake damage in Nurgal, one of the worst affected districts in Kunar province, northeastern Afghanistan.

At around midnight on the last night in August, a powerful earthquake destroyed homes and villages in Afghanistan – and the Taliban-controlled government’s restrictive policies exacerbated the suffering of women and girls caught in the disaster.

Women and girls living in eastern Afghanistan are bearing the heaviest burden after the 6.0-magnitude earthquake killed and injured people and livestock and destroyed homes.

Across the broken villages of Kunar’s mountainous Nurgal district, women and girls were trapped inside damaged homes or in flimsy shelters.

Many did not receive medical care as health workers in the area are men. Strict Taliban rules on gender interaction forbid females from being treated by male health workers – either entirely in some states or only in the presence of a male relative in others. 

“Many women survivors were left untreated because male rescuers could not examine them and female health workers were not available,” Fasihuddin Mukhlis, a local aid volunteer in Kunar, told Health Policy Watch.

“Amid the unfolding chaos, (women and girls) were just silently suffering and waiting for help,” he said.  

There were 1,992 fatalities, 3,631 injuries, and 8,489 houses were destroyed, the United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM) reported this week.

Lack of women doctors

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that about 90% of the health workforce in quake-hit provinces are men, with the number of female doctors and midwives shrinking each year under Taliban restrictions.

Last December, Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada issued a directive banning women from studying at medical institutions. Since December 2022, women have been excluded from universities and for the past three years, girls have been excluded from secondary schools.

Ironically, some aid agencies reported being asked to provide female health workers to assist in the aftermath of the earthquake, according to NPR.

However, the Taliban ignored appeals from the UN and WHO to ease its restrictions to enable that female aid workers to operate in emergency zones.

Dr Mukta Sharma, WHO’s deputy representative in Kabul, confirmed that in the initial phase of rescue and relief operations that there were no female doctors who could treat long-term injuries. 

“A very big issue now is the increasing paucity of female staff in these places,”  Sharma told Reuters.

For survivors like 22-year-old Zar Mena, pulled from the rubble after losing her husband and two children, the consequences were devastating. She suffered shrapnel wounds across her legs and back but waited days for treatment.

“She was so shocked and anxious, seeing only men around. Now, she doesn’t have any other family members left. I, along with some aid workers, moved her to a safer place,” her uncle, Hejran Ullah, told Health Policy Watch via phone.

“Had a female doctor been present, the treatment would have been immediate and her recovery less complicated,” he added.

The WHO estimates that at least 11,600 pregnant women were caught up in the quake, which affected districts across Kunar, Nangarhar, Laghman and Nuristan provinces

Afghanistan already has the highest maternal mortality rate in Asia and without sufficient female doctors and midwives, many pregnant women are delivering their babies in unsafe conditions.

The health of Afghan women and children are in jeopardy, caught between lack of resources and the Taliban’s restrictive policies.

Afghan media outlets have reported that pregnant women have died in hospitals due to a lack of female medical staff and facilities.

Taliban officials insist that women’s rights are respected “in line with Islamic law,” but it has refused to change the requirement that women may only travel with a male guardian.

Aid groups say this translates into real harm as widows cannot leave home without a surviving male relative, hospitals lack facilities for gender-segregated care, and girls drop out of school if fathers or brothers are lost.

Local media report that across Afghanistan, households with women heads often face debts and destroyed farmland, forcing families to sell assets or arrange early marriages for their daughters to survive.

Before 2021, women made up much of Afghanistan’s primary health workforce. Since the Taliban’s return in August 2021, decrees on female employment and male-guardian rules have sharply reduced the number of female doctors, midwives and aid workers across the country.

Cuts in international aid

“Women and girls are facing not only the immediate devastation but also a long-term disaster if urgent, gender-sensitive assistance is not provided,” said Susan Ferguson, UN Women’s Special Representative in Afghanistan.

Ferguson told a briefing in Geneva that Afghan women themselves had been present in relief efforts “from day one,” making up to 40% of some assistance teams. 

But funding shortages and Taliban restrictions mean there are far too few female workers in the field. 

Since the Taliban took over in 2021, foreign aid has plummeted. Some 15 million Afghans face “severe hunger”, according to the World Food Programme (WFP). However, the WFP had cut its aid to the country as it is facing a funding crisis.

“Two-thirds of female-headed households cannot afford a basic diet – nearly 20% higher than their male-headed counterparts,” according to WFP Deputy Country Director Harald Mannhardt.

Indrika Ratwatte, the UN’s Deputy Special Representative for Afghanistan, described the situation as “a crisis within a crisis,” noting that 22.5 million Afghans already need humanitarian aid and more than 1.9 million Afghans have been sent home from Iran and Pakistan this year alone.

Taliban face international criminal case

Most people displaced by the earthquake are still living in tents, joining millions of others recently forced to leave Pakistan and Iran.

In the earthquake-affected areas, many survivors are living in tents as are those sent home from neighbouring countries. But as winter approaches, their survival is threatened.

UN Women has warned that temporary shelters also expose women and girls to sexual violence and exploitation.

UN Women has launched a $2.5 million appeal to support recovery over the next year.

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has also condemned the Taliban’s ban on female UN staff entering compounds, calling it unlawful and a breach of Afghanistan’s international obligations.

Earlier this month, the UN resolved to establish an independent investigative mechanism to “collect, consolidate, preserve and analyse evidence of international crimes and the most serious violations of international law, including those that may also amount to violations and abuses of international human rights law, committed in Afghanistan, including against women and girls”.

The purpose is to prepare for independent criminal proceedings against the Taliban government.

Richard Bennett, UN Special Rapporteur on Afghanistan, described the resolution as “a decisive step to ensure that those responsible for serious international crimes will be held to account.”

Image Credits: UN Women, Ahmadi/ UNICEF, International Organization on Migration.

Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG), co-chairs the UK’s Dr Mathew Harpur and Brazil’s Ambassador Tovar da Silva Nunes.

Member states start text-based negotiations next week on the final outstanding piece of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Pandemic Agreement, the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) system.

They will have had nine days to consider the seven-page first draft of the PABS system, which was distributed late Friday (24 October) by the administration Bureau of the Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG), which is running the talks. 

The draft considers access to pathogen materials and sequence information to be on a “equal footing” with “equitable benefit-sharing” arising from this sharing – something that has already been agreed to by member states in the Pandemic Agreement’s Article 12.

The PABS system being negotiated will be an annex to Article 12, but at this stage, it is a mere skeleton and negotiators have much work ahead to add more substance.

According to Article 12,  the IGWG needs to develop provisions to govern the PABS System, “including definitions of pathogens with pandemic potential and PABS materials and sequence information, modalities, legal nature, terms and conditions, and operational dimensions”.

The draft defines the pathogens in question as those with “pandemic potential”, and the “materials and sequence information” of pathogens’ to be shared refers to the “biological material”, including DNA, RNA, and proteins.

Manufacturers’ obligations

Manufacturers of vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics that want access to pathogen information will need to sign a contract with the WHO “setting out their commitments for rapid, timely, fair and equitable benefit-sharing” in exchange.

In a pandemic, the “participating manufacturers” will make available to WHO “rapid access to their real time production of safe, quality, and effective vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics for the pathogen causing the pandemic emergency”.

Manufacturers that are party to the PABS system will also made annual payment to the WHO based on their “nature and capacity.” 

The draft also opens the door to non-manufacturers to enter into “legally binding commitments for rapid, timely, fair and equitable benefit sharing, based on their nature, capacity and use of PABS Materials and Sequence Information”. It’s is not clear who these could be.

Benefit-sharing obligations

The draft spells out eight ways in which benefits accrued from access to the pathogen information can be shared. 

These include providing access to pandemic-related health products; granting non-exclusive licenses to manufacturers in developing countries to make these health products; technical assistance and money.

Benefit-sharing may be legally binding, something that developing countries are fervently in favour of.

Pathogen information will be shared through laboratories “authorised under relevant national or domestic procedures” and those in a “WHO coordinated laboratory network”. These will need to implement “biosecurity and biosafety standards” that are applicable within the WHO laboratory networks.

Sequence information will be shared via a “WHO-recognised sequence database or databases”, which will agree not to claim intellectual property rights over the materials and sequence information.

All PABS material and sequence Information will be assigned a “unique persistent identifier”. The IGWG Bureau wants further discussion about unique persistent identifiers.

Both China and Russia have made proposals to restrict access to pathogen information in the interests of biosecurity, with China suggesting that only manufacturers based in countries that are party to the pandemic agreement should be allowed to get access to the PABS system. However, the draft proposes fairly wide access to information based within the usual biosecurity constraints.

Aside from the PABS system annex, the IGWG will also prepare the ground for the Conference of the Parties that will govern the pandemic agreement, and the terms of reference for a coordinating financial mechanism, which will help defend countries against outbreaks and pandemics.

 

“Health is not charity. It is sovereignty,” Dr Olive Shisana at CPHIA closing day.

DURBAN, South Africa — The “Durban Promise”, the ambitious outcome document of the Conference of Public Health In Africa 2025 (CPHIA) will be on the menu when global leaders meet at various Group of 20 (G20)  meetings, starting with the health working group meeting on 6 November.

That was the message from the conference, which closed on 25 October, with a pledge from its convenors to keep pressing for universal health coverage (UHC) at the next G20 meeting, capitalising on South Africa’s presidency. 

Along with UHC, the CPHIA outcome document cites five key priorities as “pillars of Africa’s Health Sovereignty”. Those include: African manufacturing; innovative health financing; pandemic preparedness and response; and data ownership and governance.

“The Durban Promise and continental commitments is what we are taking out of this conference. From Durban, a unified message resounded across Africa: Health is not charity. It is sovereignty. It is our political choice, and our economic future,” declared Olive Shisana at Saturday’s conference closing ceremony. Shisana, the first director-general of South Africa’s Department of Health under Nelson Mandela, is now president and CEO of the private health research firm, Evidence-Based Solutions.

Shisana said the Durban Promise priorities aim to transform Africa from a “passive recipient” to a “strategic contributor” in the health arena. 

“This marks the birth of Africa’s health sovereignty movement, turning crisis into opportunity and aspiration into action,” said Shisana, who co-chaired the conference’s scientific programme committee and received at the weekend its Distinguished Scientist Award for her work helping to host the annual event since its 2021 inception.   

“It will manufacture vaccines, finance systems, strengthen its primary health care, prepare for pandemics, empower its people and own its data,” she told participants at Saturday’s closing session.  Co-sponsored by Africa Centres for Disease Control, the Government of South Africa, Gavi the Vaccine Alliance, and others, the conference attracted more than 1400 in-person and 16530 livestream participants, with more than 70 countries represented. 

Important financial juncture 

Official Development Assistance (ODA) for health is projected to fall back to mid-2000 levels by 2027.

The conference comes at an important financial juncture as Shisana and others reminded participants.

Global health funding to Africa has nosedived, part of a 70% decline in international development assistance between 2021-2025, according to an Africa CDC brief released in April. 

The US shuttered USAID and with it, most of its global health aid programmes, earlier this year.  Major European donors such as Germany and the United Kingdom have also reduced contributions, shifting resources towards the Russia-Ukraine war. Meanwhile, African countries struggled to plug the funding gap, crippled by obligations to pay interest on mounting debt burdens. Official Development Assistance for health (ODA) is projected to continue to decline and could even fall to mid-2000s levels, said the OECD in June. 

What should be done about this precipitous funding drop was a recurring theme at plenaries, special sessions and panel discussions over the course of the five-day conference. 

Shisana, echoing many others, said “Africa must pack away its begging bowl” and find other means to foot its healthcare bills. 

A constant refrain was that when donors do contribute, they must work through the health ministries and treasuries of national governments; they must respect African sovereignty.

“Africa is no longer content to be just being on the side of the global response; we should now shape global health priorities. [The conference] should indeed affirm that our destiny must be African-led, African-financed and African owned,” asserted Joe Phaahla, South Africa’s deputy minister of health.

The hard part — where is the money to come from?

“Sin taxes” on tobacco, alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverages and fewer subsidies for fossil fuels could help narrow the UHC funding gap.

There was no let-up in that message throughout the event – “nothing about us without us”. 

But the hard part — where the money is to come from — and how to get more of it, did not yield easy formulas. 

Various strategies for tapping into the African diaspora were proposed. Collectively,  African nations can boast the third most populous diaspora after India and China. 

Other ideas revolved around the levying of new or better taxes on emerging or overlooked revenue sources. These include the growing informal economies in urban Africa and digital economies. 

‘Sin taxes’ got a look-in too, with some speakers advocating the ring-fencing of revenue from new levies on alcohol, tobacco and sugar so that these can fund health.

There also were discussions on how to grow African economies to expand the fiscal pie, so more funds would be available for competing domestic needs. 

While some speakers deferred to economists to spell out how this might best be achieved, it was agreed that Africa remained heavily dependent on extractive activities, notably mining, with too-little capacity to create value-added from its rich natural resources, robbing the continent of vast export revenue that ought to be funding health.

Shisana mentioned inter-Africa free trade, especially in health products and medicines, as an under-realized opportunity to spur growth and improve public health supply chains.

“If all of us in Africa were to trade across our borders,” economies across the board would be in much better shape, she declared. “We’ve got a big market of 1.4-billion people. There is no reason that Africa should be poor.” 

Less waste and corruption  

Placide Mbala, scientific programme co-chair, shares his priorities for African health on closing day.

Along with the talk about eking out new income sources and tax revenues to underwrite health spending, there was perhaps even more talk on how money being spent could be used more efficiently or redirected. In other words, less waste and corruption.

At the closing,  Placide Mbala, CPHIA’s scientific programme co-chair, summarized takeaways from the event’s eight tracks — broadly themed areas of discussion.  His comments echoed the priorities cited by The Durban Promise, with some special twists.  

For one, he stressed the importance of putting the roles of Community Health Workers on a more formal footing, and involving them in planning, with dedicated budgets and frameworks that recognised them — as part of PHC reform.

Mbala said that the primary health discussions at the conference had also identified the importance of grounding “all interventions in local ownership”.

Ibanga (MAB114), a monoclonal antibody, is one new African-born treatment. Discovered by Congolese scientist Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe, Africa CDC is supporting its deployment against Ebola.

Solutions must be found that “require domestic investment, data-driven decision-making, and partnerships that position communities as co-designers and sustainers of their own healthcare systems, not passive recipients”, said Mbala.

“When communities lead, services become more equitable and scarce resources are used when they matter most, again reducing costs,” he concluded, quoting Paul Ngwakum, regional health adviser at UNICEF’s Eastern and Southern Africa regional office: 

Zambia’s Christine Kaseba also stressed that primary health care contained the key to unlocking many of the difficulties facing the public health sector in Africa, including its funding crisis.

We are stuck because we are yet to understand that primary is fundamental to achieving universal healthcare,” said Kaseba, a specialist in gynecology and obstetrics as well as a prominent Zambian politician and the widow of the country’s late president Michael Sata.

Digital innovation and AI 

Satellilte technology in rural Guyana enables high-quality telehealth consultations. Africa aims to develop similar systems.

In terms of digital innovation and artificial intelligence – another Durban Promise priority,  the opportunities technologies may create to provide better services at less cost  loomed large. 

Everyone agreed that digital technology can  provide the solution to many logistical difficulties faced in hard-to-access rural areas, opening up  better, faster, and cheaper patient monitoring and disease surveillance.. 

But there was also a call for focus on health worker digital and AI literacy, with delegates cautioning that new tools need to be well embedded  into existing workflows, rather than assuming that technology alone would drive success.

In the same track, Caroline Mbindyo, chief executive of Amref Health Africa echoed another recurring conference theme:  healthcare as an investment rather than a cost.

“In Africa, we rarely view the health sector as a place for investment or innovation. We need to think differently about how we design digital tools, creating systems that not only improve health outcomes but also provide commercial value,”  Mbindyo said.

African manufacturing and youth engagement 

Youth Programme booth at CPHIA 2025
Jean Kaseya, director Africa CDC.

As for African manufacturing, panelists summing up the discussions on that topic on  closing day all agreed that more political will is needed to foster manufacturing capacity and to provide the necessary investments in skills, infrastructure and technology. 

And while calls for strengthening regulatory measures to safeguard patients and ensure confidence in African health products resonated, manufacturers also stressed that  regulatory bottlenecks were preventing drug makers from realising their potential.

“We can’t wait six years to bring a product to market. We need WHO and national regulators to align and fast-track African innovation,” said Stavros Nicolau, a senior executive at South Africa’s Aspen Pharma Group. 

And Serge Emaleu, a Gabon-based epidemiologist, reminded the audience that without local production Africa will continue to react to crises. 

“The boldest choice Africa can make is to exercise political courage, the political courage for taxing fairly, spending wisely and pooling regionally and collectively for the collective good,” said Emaleu, who is with the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) .

Dr Jean Kaseya, director-general of Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), the conference’s principal host, highlighted the importance of youth engagement and mentioned the launch at the conference of the YES! Health Youth initiative, in collaboration with conference co-hosts, AfricaBio, a non-profit biotechnology stakeholders association.

The next Conference of Public Health In Africa conference is to be held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in November 2026, Kaseya said.

Image Credits: CPHIA 2025 , OECD, 2025 , World Bank, 2019, CPHIA, 2025, Africa CDC , @TuwilikaNafuka.

WMO marked 75th year of operations with a push for countries to ramp up early warning systems as climate impacts intensify.

Of the 62 countries who were assessed globally, only half have the basic capacity to monitor extreme weather events, and 16% of the countries have less-than-basic capacity, according to a new report by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).

The report, ‘Early Warnings for All in Focus: Hazard Monitoring and Forecasting’ was released during last week’s Extraordinary Session of the WMO Congress (October 20-23), found the situation is worst in fragile, conflict and violence-affected contexts.

But there is also some progress. The land-based stations that record weather data have increased the observations and daily reports that they share with WMO by 60% since 2019, the report documented. More data helps with faster and more accurate weather forecasting.

WMO is focusing on early warning systems for all countries around the world by 2027 as a part of its Early Warnings for All’ initiative. “Without your rigorous modelling and forecasting, we would not know what lies ahead — or how to prepare for it,” the UN Secretary-General António Guterres Secretary-General said at a dialogue during the Congress.

“Without your long-term monitoring, we wouldn’t benefit from the warnings and guidance that protect communities and save millions of lives and billions of dollars each year,” he added.

This year marks the 75th year of the UN weather agency. Apart from the discussions on early warning system, a special session of the WMO governing body, the Executive Council,  on Friday saw deliberations on finance and future investment strategies at a challenging time for the global development sector, which is plagued by a decline in donor contributions.

Countries struggling to keep up with weather data

Of the 62 countries assessed by the WMO for their capacity to collect weather data for forecasting of extreme weather events, 16% had less-than-basic capacity.

Climate change is increasing the frequency of extreme weather events. But better forecasting makes it more possible to predict many of these, including heat waves, cold waves, heavy rainfall, droughts and cyclones.

Even so, the capacity to do this remains low, particularly in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS), according to the report.

For countries with low capacity and gaps in their own system, WMO provides support. Currently 85 countries are receiving forecasting for severe weather conditions from the WMO of the 193 member countries.

Related to that, access to satellite data and other technologies also remains limited in many parts of the developing world.

Globally 56% of members now use satellite data for at least one hazard, but only 20% do so for all their priority hazards. Regional partnerships are helping plug some of the gaps by combining hardware, training and institutional capacity-building that is tailored to regional needs.

“The success of ‘Early Warnings for All’ is not measured in reports or resolutions, but in lives saved and livelihoods protected. This report is both a record of progress and a call to action,” WMO Secretary-General Celeste Saulo wrote in the report’s Foreword.

“It shows that global solidarity, guided by science and driven by partnership, can deliver transformative change. As we look toward 2027, let us redouble our efforts to ensure that no one — no matter where they live — is left unprotected.”

Staff changes at WMO amidst funding challenges

Top funders of the WMO ‘Early Warnings for All’ initiative in 2025.

While the US is one of the top funders of the WMO report ‘Early Warnings for All’, the new Trump administration has meanwhile slashed funding to its own weather agency National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).  The dismantling of United States government’s aid agency, USAID, also has affected the collection of weather and climate data globally.

The US is yet to pay WMO the amount it had committed for the years 2024 and 2025. The WMO Secretariat did not name US explicitly during the finance discussions on the final day of the Congress but acknowledged it was a “challenging time for funding.”

To the relief of some observers, the United States has so far not withdrawn support from the meteorological agency.  In last week’s sessions, the US representative played a “very constructive” and “positive” role, according to Clare Nullis, WMO’s media officer.

“The US is… still very active member of WMO. We need their support. We count on their support. And the US also needs WMO in terms of observations, data sets. Obviously, it’s an area that we are watching very, very closely,” Nullis said in response to a question from Health Policy Watch at a Geneva press conference during the Congress.

The US did make a push for striking a reference to the Paris agreement in a key document on global greenhouse gas emissions, but it did not go through, given the pushback from other countries.

So far, Washington has also not sought to openly challenge WMO’s growing role in monitoring climate – which effectively is long-term weather patterns. This despite the cutbacks at NOAA as well as recent moves to defund and dismantling some of the most powerful US climate monitoring tools.

Those slated to be decommissioned before their time include  NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), which measures atmospheric carbon dioxide, and can identify sources and sinks from space. Another is OCO-3—not technically a satellite, but an instrument that has been affixed to the International Space Station—which also measures atmospheric carbon dioxide.

SAGE 3, short for Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment, which measures stratospheric ozone, aerosols, and water  vapour, is also in the administration’s crosshairs, as is Deep Space Climate Observatory, or DSCOVR, a joint project of NOAA and NASA. The budget proposal also recommends shutting down the development of the next generation of satellites and space instruments for Earth science, measuring storms, clouds and aerosols, among other phenomenon, according to the prestigious US-based journal, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

2026-27 Budget allocating more money to activities and trimming staff

WHO revised its budget for 2026-27, cutting staff budget to give it more flexibility to invest in research and other costs.

In contrast to the World Health Organization, WMO’s neighbour at the UN campus in Geneva, the WMO said it did not plan to drastically cut its 2026-27 budget, which is planned for $138.7 million.  However, the organization is realigning its spending, Nullis said, with funding allocated to staff being cut by 7.2% and allocated to “other costs” to increase the agency’s “flexibility.”

Several senior (D2) roles have been eliminated and new roles created that will focus on regional coordination and digital transformation to help improve the efficiency of WMO’s operations while using lesser resources.

WMO has also set up a task force that will identify areas of priority for the organization going further.

While voluntary contributions from other donor countries and foundations have helped close the 2026 budget gap, 2027 looks more uncertain, Saulo admitted.

“I would also like to appreciate those countries that have been supporting us with voluntary contributions and also have been advancing their payments to facilitate navigating these difficult times,” Saulo said at the Congress, adding. “In a world where we are facing challenges, …. the idea is that we will try to look for extraordinary or extra budgetary funds to allocate to the regions.”

Image Credits: WMO, Early Warnings for All in Focus: Hazard Monitoring and Forecasting report.

A young patient with diabetes attends a check-up in Kigali, Rwanda. Rwanda is trying to improve chronic disease treatment in primary health care as part of its 4×4 initiative to quadruple its health care workforce between 2023-2027.

Africa is continuing to make progress in meeting its Universal Health Coverage (UHC) targets (part of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals). Countries like Rwanda and Ethiopia are two examples of African countries making exemplary progress. Kenya, Ghana and South Africa are also among those making significant progress towards realising this dream. However, there is still a long way to go if the continent is to achieve its target on the Service Coverage Index by 2030. The continent’s average on the scale of UHC rose from 23 in 2000 to 44 in 2021, still only halfway to its projected goal.

Accelerated progress toward UHC is possible, however, it requires an initial step; resilient primary health care (PHCs) systems.

Why primary health care systems matter

Mother and young child in clinic in Sudan. Primary health care is the anchor to Universal Health Care (UHC).

Those who are most vulnerable across our continent – women, children, and under-resourced communities – continue to be at risk. Each year, approximately  70% of global maternal deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa, with an estimated 178,000 mothers and 1 million newborns dying each year, many from preventable illness.

For too long Africa has focused on addressing individual diseases, largely a result of international donors and their priorities. The result is a fragmented system that misses the opportunity to provide more streamlined, holistic care through robust primary care systems.

Primary health care (PHC) systems provide essential services ranging from prenatal care and child vaccines to other life-saving treatments. They are frequently the only times many people and communities receive health care. Over 60% of the continent’s population lives in rural areas, where primary healthcare facilities are often the only available health service. Put simply, without strong PHC systems, universal health coverage will not be achievable.

This week, Africa’s leading health experts have convened at the 4th International Conference on Public Health (CPHIA) in Durban, South Africa to explore the theme: “Moving towards self-reliance to achieve universal health coverage and health security in Africa”. In those discussions, health leaders are sharing ideas to support and shape more innovative, dynamic, and visionary PHC systems in Africa.  See related story.

Africa Seeks More Self-Reliance Amid Disease Outbreaks and Decline in Donor Funds

Supporting PHC infrastructure through innovation

The 2020 pandemic exposed a critical gap in the public health sector: the infrastructure needed to support resilient primary health systems. Countries buckled under the clinical demands of COVID-19, which were exacerbated by the lack of basic commodities in many healthcare facilities.

Electricity
Nearly one-eighth of the global population does not have access to health facilities with reliable electricity, with the highest rates of energy poverty in Africa.

A 5-year study conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa from 2013 – 2018 found that over 40% of PHC facilities lack clean water. Some 15% of Sub-Saharan health facilities have no electricity at all while an estimated 50% lack reliable electricity services. Another study of health facilities across 18 sub-Saharan African countries also found that only 74% of health facilities had basics like soap, running water, or alcohol-based hand rub. The result is that only 17% of facilities could ensure infection prevention protocols. These are the same facilities that were on the frontlines of the deadly pandemic two years later. And beyond these infrastructure issues is a human resources crisis: Africa has only 1.3 health workers per 1,000 people, which sits well below the WHO minimum threshold of 4.5.

To ensure everything from surgeries to childbirth can occur safely, investing in robust PHC system infrastructure is a must. We are starting to see the deployment of African-made technology, from solar-powered clinics to smart water systems. Our technology can power the pathway forward.

The private sector can step up as a partner

Nurse calls an expert on videoconference in a patient consultation. Telehealth and AI can improve access to services and their quality.

This is where the business community has a critical role to play. Across the continent, the private sector is increasingly stepping up as a partner in delivering stronger and more resilient primary health care systems. Businesses are investing in digital tools, data systems, and supply chain innovations that help extend quality services to communities that public facilities alone cannot always reach. In Kenya, for instance, the rapid growth of homegrown telehealth platforms and mobile-based health insurance models has expanded access to consultations and coverage, particularly for peri-urban and rural areas. Similar collaborations are emerging in Nigeria, where private logistics companies are supporting vaccine delivery to last-mile clinics. These examples show how Africa’s business community can be an active force for progress – bridging gaps, driving innovation, and strengthening partnerships that make universal health coverage and health security truly attainable.

Primary health clinics with digital health record systems have been shown to deliver higher quality care. For example, a study at Festac Primary Health Centre in Lagos, Nigeria, found that introducing electronic health records significantly reduced paperwork and improved service delivery, freeing health workers to spend more time on patient care.

African innovation can further power PHC infrastructure by supporting the training demands of the health workforce today and in the future. The WHO estimates a shortfall of 6.1 million healthcare workers in Africa by 2030. This gap poses a major barrier to achieving universal health coverage. Remote medical training distributed through mobile devices can help make opportunities for frontline health more accessible and affordable. These tools can help incentivise young professionals to pursue health careers and close this critical workforce gap in PHC systems. Another example is Kenya’s M-JALI platform, which has trained thousands of community health workers via mobile devices, improving service delivery and making health careers more attainable.

CPHIA 2025 and beyond

We stand at a time where innovation and necessity are converging, giving Africa the chance to rewrite its health story and build a future where all Africans have access to quality healthcare. Achieving this demands bold, cross-sector partnerships that strengthen primary health systems to meet Africa’s evolving health challenges. Universal health coverage isn’t some far-off goal. It’s something we must start working toward today.

Dr. Amit N. Thakker, is executive chairman, Africa Health Business, which facilitates collaborations acros sAfrica between governent, businesses and communiites on the development of better tools for community health care.

 

Image Credits: G Lontro/ NCD Alliance, WHO/Lindsay Mackenzie, DC Studio on Freepik.

A doctor checks the amputated limb of a young man in Gaza. Some 5,000 Palestinians have lost limbs as a result of the war.

At least $7 billion is needed to rebuild Gaza’s health system, which has no fully functioning hospitals, and critical shortages of essential medicines, equipment and health workers, World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told a media briefing on Thursday.

While Tedros welcomed the ceasefire negotiated by US President Donald Trump on 10 October as “the best medicine”, he portrayed a grim picture of the impact of Israel’s attack on the territory in retaliation for Hamas’s attacks on 7 October 2023.

“More than 170,000 people have injuries in Gaza, including more than 5,000 amputees and 3,600 people with major burns,” said Tedros.

“At least 42,000 people have injuries that require long-term rehabilitation, and every month, 4,000 women give birth in unsafe conditions. Hunger and disease have not stopped, and children’s lives are still at risk.”

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

The WHO’s immediate focus since the ceasefire took effect has been on sending medical supplies to hospitals, deploying additional emergency medical teams and scaling up medical evacuations. 

Around 15,000 patients need specialist treatment outside Gaza, including 4,000 children, and Tedros appealed for more countries to assist in their treatment and for referrals to the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, to resume.

In the coming days, the WHO will focus on four areas: maintaining life-saving and life-sustaining essential health services; strengthening public health intelligence, early warning and prevention and control of communicable diseases; coordinating health partners; and supporting the recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction of the health system. 

“Our 60-day ceasefire plan calls for $4.5 billion, but the total cost for rebuilding Gaza’s health system will be at least $7 billion,” said Tedros.

Israel obliged to ensure Gaza’s ‘basic needs’

Dr Theresa Zakaria, WHO unit head for humanitarian and disaster action.

On Wednesday, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion that Israel, as Gaza’s occupying power, is obliged to “ensure the basic needs of the local population, including the supplies essential for their survival” and “not to impede the provision of these supplies”.

However, the Rafah Crossing between Israel and Egypt remains closed, although Israel had agreed to open it last week.

Dr Rik Peeperkorn, WHO’s Representative in Occupied Palestinian territory (oPT), said that while the Kerem Shalom and Kissufim crossings between Israel and Gaza were open, the flow of aid was too slow and opening the Rafah passage between Egypt’s Sinai and Gaza is “urgent”.

Since the ceasefire, the WHO has been able to bring in one of 39 pallets of vital supplies, but it still has 2,100 pallets of medical supplies ready to move, said Peeperkorn.

Less than half the 600 agreed-on daily number of trucks have been able to enter Gaza since the ceasefire, which meant that people were not getting the food they needed, said Tedros.

“Over 600,000 people in Gaza are facing a catastrophic level of food insecurity. It is our collective duty to also make sure they do not lose their lives because we have not been able to scale up the aid at the level that we require,” stressed Dr Theresa Zakaria, WHO unit head for humanitarian and disaster action.

30% polio budget cut threatens progress seen to date

A Pakistani health worker administers a polio vaccine in a door-to-door campaign in a sensitive region of the country. Such outreach is critical to eradicating wild poliovirus in the regions where it remains endemic.

Tedros also took up the new challenges faced in polio eradication, noting that Friday, October 24, is World Polio Day. Polio incidence has dropped by 99% since 1988, when the Global Polio Eradication Initiative was launched by WHO, with the United States, Rotary International and UNICEF as founding partners.

“When we launched the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI),  more than 350,000 children were paralysed by polio every year,” Tedros noted. “Today, that number has dropped by more than 99%.” Just 39 cases of wild poliovirus have been reported so far this year, 9 in Afghanistan and 30 in Pakistan, according to the latest WHO and GPEI data.   

However, that progress is also threatened today by the 30% budget cut that GPEI will see next year.  The 2026 budget of $786.456 million was  released on 13 October,  following a New York City meeting of GPEI partner agencies. That’s as compared to $1.1 billion in 2025. There is also a $1.7 billion funding gap for the GPEI 2022-2029 strategy,  revised last year.

The budget cuts include a 26% reduction for outbreak response, and a 34% reduction in surveillance activities in WHO’s African Region and the Eastern Mediterranean regions outside of Pakistan and Afghanistan – the two countries where wild poliovirus continues to be transmitted. These two countries remain, according to WHO, the highest priority “as they are key to a polio-free world.”

Cases down this year in Afghanistan and Pakistan

Polio worldwide

Both Afghanistan and Pakistan have so far seen a decline in cases this year, with 30 cases of wild poliovirus recorded in Pakistan – as compared to 74 in 2024. Afghanistan’s Taliban regime conducted their first polio vaccination campaign in April  2025, and as of 22 October,  just nine cases had been confirmed in the country as compared to 25 in 2024, according to GPEI.

However, along with budget cuts, devastating floods and the recent earthquakes in Afghanistan have hampered continuing surveillance, as well as the Taliban’s continued suspension of door-to-door campaigns as well as the ban on female health workers delivering vaccines.

In other lower risk areas, “more extensive active surveillance, supervision and training, will need to be reduced,” the plan states, warning that these countries, particularly in low-income countries in Africa,  “face the greatest risk for surveillance gaps that may lead to missed transmission and delayed outbreak response.”

Those cuts could affect detection and response to outbreaks like the wild poliovirus outbreak detected in Malawi and Mozambique in 2022 – beginning with a case that had reportedly been imported from Pakistan several years earlier, and leading to a mass vaccination campaign. Currently, there are ongoing outbreaks of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) in the Lake Chad Basin and the Horn of Africa. Madagascar officially ended its cVDPV1 outbreak in May 2025. Circulating virus type 3 (cVDPV3) has also been detected in the last 12 months in Algeria, Cameroon, Nigeria, and Chad.

Vaccine-derived cases are the main concern in the world today, occuring when unvaccinated or undervaccinated groups are exposed to live virus shedded by other, vaccinated people through contact with feces or sewage.  Poliovirus is still found in the sewage of WHO’s European and American regions – with vaccine-derived cases periodically surfacing in those regions too. While new, more genetically stable oral vaccine formulations are gradually being introduced to limit vaccine-derived cases, they are not a magic bullet. 

Dr Ahmed Jamal

US Congress pledging continued support but….

Leading Republican members of the US Congress  have pledged to continue supporting polio elimination efforts in 2026, at the same level as this year’s $265 million. However, it’s unclear how the money will be distributed insofar as USAID, one major channel, has been dismantled while the United States withdrew in January from the World Health Organization, which typically implemented 40% of the polio elimination programme, while UNICEF handled the other 40%.  The US is today GPEI’s second leading donor after the Gates Foundation, while Rotary International is third.

Tedros and other WHO officials did not discuss the details of how GPEI monies would now be distributed in light of the US freezeout – but stressed that political and geopolitical tensions shouldn’t be allowed to set back progress.

After all smallpox was eradicated in the midst of the Cold War, WHO’s Director of Polio Eradication, Dr Ahmed Jamal, noted: “It wasn’t an easy time. There were so many other conflicts that were going on. So the mission is possible. We all committed to ending polio.”

Added Tedros, “Decades ago, the world overcame geopolitical and geographic barriers to end smallpox. Let’s do the same for polio. Let’s finish the job.”

-Elaine Ruth Fletcher contributed to reporting on GPEI. 

Image Credits: WHO, Pakistan Polio Eradication Program , WHO/GISC.