From left to right: Dalila Hamou (WIPO), Dr Alain Labrique (WHO), and Bilel Jamoussi (ITU) hold the newly launched joint strategic guidelines at the Artificial Intelligence for Good Global Summit in Geneva.
From left to right: Dalila Hamou (WIPO), lain Labrique (WHO), and Bilel Jamoussi (ITU) hold the newly launched joint strategic guidelines at the AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva.

As artificial intelligence drives rapid health innovations, global guardrails, equitable data, and local capacity are needed to ensure equitable progress. To address this, a landmark framework launched by three United Nations agencies lays out a strategic roadmap for innovators. Meanwhile, health leaders emphasise that lower-income regions must become co-creators of future innovations.

New guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence lay out a roadmap for health innovators to navigate complex intellectual property, data governance, and regulatory pathways. The landmark framework, co-authored by experts from the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), was presented at the “AI for Good” Global Summit in Geneva last week.

“This collaboration between these three organisations brings our expertise together and shows how we can have a collaboration in this very important field,” said Dalila Hamou, director of the external relations division at WIPO, at the Summit.

The joint initiative arrives as technological innovation accelerates, with the number of new generative artificial intelligence patents published over the last two years topping the total from the entire preceding decade. For instance, AI-assisted liquid biopsy tests can now predictively detect multiple cancers at stage one – when survival rates reach up to 92% – long before physical symptoms manifest.

At the same time, critics warn that the rapid deployment of unregulated advanced algorithms increases risks and may end up amplifying existing health disparities and deepening social exclusion.

“The few exceptions when technology actually had an equitable positive impact in society was when equity was included by design,” said Ricardo Baptista Leite, CEO of HealthAI, in an interview with Health Policy Watch during the summit, echoing the need for guardrails.

Embedding equity in the artificial intelligence life cycle

An equitable IP framework uses field-of-use licensing and tiered cloud access to bridge global disparities.
An equitable IP framework for AI should apply field-of-use licensing and tiered cloud access to mitigate global disparities, advocates say.

Fundamentally, the joint framework, which is entirely non-biding, recommends a mixed intellectual property system for new AI tools. It guides developers in strategically combining patents for technical methods with trade secrets for proprietary datasets, ensuring commercial viability – while also building trust through careful adherence to quality assurance, safety monitoring and patient privacy.

But to actively embed equity into the innovation life cycle, the joint framework also champions access models such as differential pricing and field-of-use licensing. These mechanisms allow patent holders to serve profitable commercial markets while partnering with domestic manufacturers in the Global South for vital technology transfers.

Specifically, field-of-use licensing allows patent holders to legally differentiate their intellectual property rights by geography or therapeutic application. This means a developer can maintain exclusive, highly profitable sales in the Global North while simultaneously licensing the identical algorithm to a domestic partner in a lower-income region.

Similarly, differential pricing leverages flexible delivery methods, such as cloud-based architectures, to offer tiered access to artificial intelligence services. This mechanism ensures that resource-constrained health systems pay reduced, subsidised fees for vital diagnostic tools, while the same technology generates premium commercial revenue in wealthier markets.

Since the international guidelines lack the binding enforcement mechanisms needed to standardise protections globally, voluntary frameworks must be actively translated into enforceable national regulations, the 2025 HealthAI Global Landscape Report stresses.

Fiscal pressure drives new collaborations

From left to right: Catherine Cheney (Devex), Alex Aliper (Insilico Medicine), Leslie Yeh (Google.org), Rita Rhayem (Gavi), and John Fairhurst (Global Fund) participate in a panel discussion at the AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva.
From left to right: Catherine Cheney (Devex), Alex Aliper (Insilico Medicine), Leslie Yeh (Google.org), Rita Rhayem (Gavi), and John Fairhurst (Global Fund) participate in a panel discussion at the AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva.

The urgency to implement these global standards is driven by the fast-changing face of the technologies as well as severe economic pressures, which are prompting health systems to leverage largely unregulated artificial intelligence tools for rapid efficiency gains and/or to reach underserved populations.

“We can’t expect every country to suddenly find money in this current fiscal context that they’ve not had for the last 10 years,” said John Fairhurst, head of private sector engagement at the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, during a panel discussion with Gavi the Vaccine Alliance, and Google.org at last week’s AI for Good summit in Geneva. He noted that AI offers a pathway forward because “what countries are looking for is efficiencies. They’re looking for the ability to drive greater impact from every dollar that they spend.”

One breakthrough innovation highlighted at the summit pairs acoustic analysis with machine learning to detect tuberculosis directly from the sound of a patient’s cough. This tool, currently still in pilot stages, can be scaled up rapidly over basic mobile networks to identify people infected with TB earlier in the infection cycle.

“It’s a disease where we miss something like 3.6 to 4 million people a year, and those people go on to infect more people,” added Fairhurst.

This tool is part of a wider strategic partnership between The Global Fund and Google.org, the corporate social responsibility arm of Google, highlighting the advantages of public-private sector collaborations in a fast-developing AI landscape.

“Rather than focusing on a singular or point-to-point partnership, we try to bring together the cross-functional players [and] the cross-sector players,” said Leslie Yeh, director of scientific progress for Google.org. She explained that by treating health challenges as interconnected systems, partners can share learnings “so that we can get towards this accelerated outcome together and […] not leave anyone behind.”

Empowering local health capacity

Joyce Nabende, AI lab head, Makerere University (Uganda).
Joyce Nabende, AI lab head, Makerere University (Uganda).

To effectively serve resource-limited settings and build local health capacities, developers must also design digital health tools capable of working entirely offline or with limited power and internet data access.

“If you think about low or limited settings that we come from, then you have to ensure that you have models that can work, for example, offline or with devices that are limited,” emphasised Joyce Nabende, head of the artificial intelligence lab at Makerere University in Uganda.

Innovators are currently working to make new technologies accessible by deploying AI diagnostic tools directly onto portable phones and other devices. For example, healthcare providers in parts of rural Africa can use offline, AI-assisted ultrasound tools to triage pregnancy risks, so that only the most at-risk cases travel to distant specialist centres.

Beyond hardware adaptations, international tech researchers and leaders like Nabende stress that true empowerment requires cultivating technological expertise directly where the medical challenges occur. This strategic shift involves transferring more advanced digital capabilities into the Global South.

Bridging the data equity divide

A 3D rendering of a neural network representing artificial intelligence.
To ensure the rapid deployment of artificial intelligence does not amplify existing disparities, digital health innovations must actively embed equity by design.

Another problem involves deploying algorithms in low- and middle-income countries without representative foundational data, which currently risks perpetuating systemic health disparities. Hidden biases within imported models can trigger inappropriate clinical triaging and inadvertently cause severe patient harm.

“When we import models, they’re often trained on usually high-income countries, populations that don’t represent the target populations where these tools are meant to be deployed,” said Alain Labrique, director of data, digital health, analytics and AI at the WHO, during a panel discussion.

Approximately 90% of global genomic data currently belongs to people of European descent, dangerously skewing the efficacy of predictive tools for diverse global populations, warned Alireza Haghighi, director of the Harvard International Center for Genetic Disease, during the summit.

Consequently, governments in the Global South demand an active role as co-creators of medical AI technologies that have to undergo rigorous local validation before clinical deployment.

“Africa must not be only a market for digital health solutions,” said Habiba Mizouni, representing the Tunisian Ministry of Health, during a keynote speech at the summit. She asserted that the continent must become a producer of ethical and context-specific health AI, not merely a consumer of imported digital solutions.

To actively support this transition, the newly launched guidelines champion access models that enable the adaptation of algorithms to local disease patterns and require developers to share performance data across diverse populations to ensure algorithmic non-discrimination.

Addressing regulatory fragmentation

A major issue hindering these equitable advances is regulatory fragmentation, which prevents emerging developers from safely scaling their life-saving tools.

HealthAI CEO Ricardo Baptista Leite.
HealthAI CEO Ricardo Baptista Leite.

“Small and medium enterprises don’t stand a chance if they have to deal with different regulatory environments in every country they go to,” said HealthAI’s Leite. The Geneva-based global non-profit agency supports governments in building regulatory ecosystems to responsibly assess and scale these AI technologies.

To construct this infrastructure, the agency is building a Global Regulatory Network (GRN) that recently expanded to include Zambia, the Philippines, and Brazil. While artificial intelligence powerhouses like the United States and China remain outside formal GRN membership, they actively engage through broader communities of practice to prevent geopolitical fracturing, Leite explained.

To align internationally fragmented systems, the network is currently developing a global early warning system for post-market monitoring of new digital tools and devices. This shared platform will allow international regulators to instantly detect and communicate adverse algorithmic events, ensuring patient safety while building long-term societal trust in adaptive technologies, echoing the goals of the joint UN guidelines.

Build trust to keep innovation at pace

A robotic hand reaching into a digital network on a blue background, symbolising artificial intelligence.
Joint guidelines by WIPO, ITU and WHO set intellectual property standards and innovation guardrails.

As long as the regulatory landscape remains fragmented, both developers and patients are ultimately penalised by delayed access to life-saving medical diagnostics, the UN agencies state. The new framework directly addresses this systemic friction by proposing common intellectual property strategies and technical standards.

“Standards create trust. Without standards, innovation remains isolated. With standards, innovation becomes scalable and sustainable,” concluded Tunisian representative Mizouni.

Ultimately, the enthusiasm that greeted the new WHO, ITU, and WIPO joint report signals a readiness to govern digital health. If international guardrails support collaborative momentum and trust, the current wave of technological innovation could successfully reduce global health inequities and scale the life-saving tuberculosis and cancer breakthroughs presented in Geneva.

However, to translate these frameworks into reality, international regulators and national governments must accelerate to match the rapid pace of the technology itself. Building this regulatory legitimacy is the only way to ensure patient safety and global adoption because, as HealthAI CEO Leite emphasised, “Innovation will move at the speed of trust”.

See related story:

An Equitable Pandemic Agreement is a Global Public Good

Image Credits: Tara Winstead via Pexels, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, Google DeepMind via Pexels, HealthAI.

Experts urging a youth social media restriction insist children cannot resist deliberately addictive platforms on their own.
Lawmakers urging a phased youth social media restriction insist children cannot resist deliberately addictive platforms on their own.

The European Commission is preparing more robust youth social media restrictions to protect children from addictive algorithms, following urgent expert warnings and landmark court rulings. But unlike the blanket digital bans imposed in countries such as Australia on everyone under the age of 16, restrictions would be eased gradually as children grow older.

As countries increasingly move toward youth social media restrictions, an EU expert panel recommends the bloc enforce a “phased and gradual” digital childhood. The experts advise no independent access for children under 13, followed by a graduated transition into autonomy where “safety-by-design” is the default standard.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen expressed support for this approach, relying on Eurobarometer data showing widespread public concern. According to the study, 63% of Europeans want EU rules restricting children’s access to social platforms by age, either through an outright prohibition or delayed access.

“The platforms have a duty of care towards their users, especially the most vulnerable among them,” said von der Leyen, reacting to the panel recommendation.

This autumn, the Commission plans to propose new legislation to the European Parliament that would adopt the scheme for staggered, age-appropriate access.

Members of the European Parliament signalled broad support for the Commission’s regulatory push. However, some key lawmakers are demanding even stricter measures, such as raising the minimum digital access age to 15 years and mandating a non-addictive “youth mode”.

Science supports youth social media restriction

From left to right, Professor Jörg Fegert, Ursula von der Leyen and Dr Maria Melchior present recommendations.
From left to right, Professor Jörg Fegert, Ursula von der Leyen and Dr Maria Melchior present recommendations.

The regulatory push aims to dismantle engagement-maximising business models that prioritise profit over the physical and mental health of vulnerable children. The EU expert panel insists that tech providers must retain primary responsibility for platform safety, rather than shifting the burden of protection onto parents or the minors themselves.

The authors of the report underlying the recommendations, Dr Maria Melchior, Research Director at the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), and Professor Jörg Fegert, Medical Director of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the Ulm University Hospital (Germany), highlight a critical neurobiological mismatch during adolescence. Children have highly active emotional and reward systems, which overpower the still-developing prefrontal cortex responsible for impulse control. Because of this imbalance, minors are especially vulnerable to platforms optimised for immediate gratification and continuous external stimulation

Based on emerging research from the UNESCO international ethics committee, neuroscientists highlight that these digital environments exploit the developing adolescent brain by merging fundamental social drives with powerful algorithmic reward systems.

According to experts, platforms intentionally condition reward systems through infinite scrolling and variable feedback, directly manipulating the ventral striatum.

While evidence of digital harm continues to mount, scientists acknowledge that establishing a definitive causal link remains a subject of ongoing debate. Researchers warn that tech giants restricting data access forces independent academics to rely heavily on correlative studies, making exact behavioural impacts difficult to prove.

EU fines and civil liability for addictive algorithms

Driven by deteriorating youth mental health, countries including Germany, France, and Spain are also actively proposing domestic access restrictions for minors. However, media law experts point to the EU’s responsibility under the Digital Services Act (DSA).

Only just last week, the European Commission issued a preliminary ruling that found Meta in breach of the Digital Services Act for its addictive design of Instagram and Facebook. If the decision is confirmed following a response from Meta, the Commission could issue a non-compliance decision, which can trigger large fines – up to 6% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the provider.

Earlier this year, US courts in California and New Mexico ordered social media companies to pay millions in damages for creating addictive products that juries determined had caused users’ depression and anxiety, in the California case, and in the New Mexico ruling, failed to safeguard users of its apps from child predators

As global efforts intensify to enforce youth social media restrictions, the burden seems to be shifting toward tech companies to prove their digital environments are safe before accessing vulnerable populations.

 

Image Credits: Kampus Production via Pexels, European Union.

Plant-based substances remain the basis of today’s illicit drug trade, but more powerful and dangerous synthetic drugs have inherent advantages that position them to take over ever more of the market, according to a new report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Conflict is reshaping the global trade map, and the collapse of Afghanistan’s opium production could, paradoxically, be pushing the world even faster toward more dangerous synthetics. Meanwhile, governments continue to prioritise punishment over care for people caught up in the cycle of drug use.

Nearly half a million people died from drug use in 2023, driven by infectious disease, untreated addiction and the spread of synthetic drugs more potent than anything markets have seen before, according to the new report by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

“The consequences are lethal,” Monica Juma, UNODC’s executive director, wrote in the World Drug Report 2026. “These deaths are a reminder that the world drug problem remains, at its nucleus, a human challenge that affects lives, families and communities.”

An estimated 331 million people worldwide used illicit drugs in 2024, the highest number ever recorded and a 34% increase over the past decade that has well outpaced population growth.

Part, but not all, of the recorded rise reflects “the availability of new and more accurate data,” per the report, meaning better tracking of use that was already there.

“As drug use increases, more people are exposed to health and social risks,” Juma wrote. “Yet as healthcare needs continue to grow, access to treatment remains unequal. In many parts of the world, services are scarce or unavailable, leaving millions, especially women and vulnerable groups, without access to recovery and support.”

People who use drugs, 2024.

The report describes a drug trade in the middle of a historic transformation, away from crops like coca, opium poppy and cannabis that need land, seasons and favourable climates to grow, and toward chemicals that can be synthesised in laboratories anywhere in the world and sold to customers close by.

But synthetics are also leading more and more people into uncharted waters, with wide variations in toxicity and often lethal or unknown impacts on health. A record 755 new psychoactive substances were detected in circulation in 2024. Five times more unique drug types, primarily synthetic, now appear in seizures than before 2000.

“We have seen an unprecedented spike in new types of drugs on the market, and worryingly, some are more potent or dangerous than before,” Juma said.

The global drug market, she told the report’s launch in Vienna, is “rapidly evolving, expanding, and in some cases outrunning the very systems designed to stop it.”

More than overdoses: hepatitis C and HIV are the biggest killers

Of the 492,000 deaths attributed to drug use in 2023, just 172,500 were direct deaths such as fatal poisonings. Most of the rest were killed slowly, by infections passed through needles years or decades earlier.

“Opioids continue to account for the largest part of the global burden of disease attributed to drug use, while hepatitis C remains a key driver of drug use-related deaths,” the report finds. Opioids are “the most lethal group of drugs, accounting for nearly three quarters of the estimated total number of deaths directly related to drugs.”

Cirrhosis and liver disease caused by hepatitis C were the leading cause of death attributed to drug use, responsible for 46% of the total, some 224,528 lives in 2023. Opioid overdoses and other toxic effects of drug dependence were the largest source of direct deaths, accounting for 26%.

HIV/AIDS claimed another 15% of lives from people living both with the HIV virus and addiction.  That toll lands as the global HIV response reels from the biggest funding crisis in its history, with services for people who inject drugs, long among the populations left furthest behind, further squeezed by the donor retreat.

HIV Response Faces ‘Biggest Storm’ in Its History After 23% Funding Nosedive

An estimated 14.3 million people injected drugs in 2024. Nearly half of them, 7 million people, were living with hepatitis C, and almost one in eight with HIV. The risk of acquiring HIV is 14 times higher for people who inject drugs than for the general population.

Drug deaths remain a fraction of the toll from legal substances, which sit outside UNODC’s treaty mandate. Tobacco kills around 8 million people a year and alcohol some 2.6 million. But illicit drugs strike earlier in life. Use is concentrated between the ages of 15 and 34, and the report counts 29 million years of healthy life lost to drugs in 2023.

“Young people, in particular, are often more exposed to high-risk patterns of drug-use and drug-related violence,” Juma wrote.

One in 12 people get treatment, only one in 23 women

Of the 63 million people living with drug use disorders, only one in 12 received any form of treatment in 2024.

Coverage is thinnest in Africa and Asia, where the epidemic is youngest: a third of people in treatment in Africa are under 25, rising to nearly half in South America. The report lists the high cost of treatment, chronic shortages of funding and staff, long waiting lists, missing medications and “stigma and sometimes criminalization faced by patients” among the barriers.

Just one in 23 women with a drug use disorder receives treatment, against one in nine men, even though women progress faster from first use to dependence, a phenomenon researchers call the “telescoping effect.”

“Women use drugs less than men, but when they do, the impact on their lives is greater,” the report states.

Women who inject drugs are 20% more likely than men to be living with HIV. Women more often begin using drugs to self-medicate pain, depression or anxiety, and face what the report calls “double, triple or multiple stigma,” judged both for their drug use and for failing gender role expectations, “which is aggravated if they have children.”

Heightened stigma, a lack of services for women’s needs, “a lack of childcare and the fear of losing custody of their children while in treatment” keep women out of care, the report finds.

“When they enter drug treatment, women exhibit similar or, in some cases, better treatment outcomes in relation to drug use disorders than men,” it notes.

The pain divide and the opioid crisis

In 2021, 73.5 million people worldwide experienced what the Lancet Commission on Palliative Care defines as serious health-related suffering: pain and distress so severe it cannot be relieved without medical intervention. Nearly 80% of them lived in low- and middle-income countries.

Those same countries received 14% of the world’s pharmaceutical opioids.

Adjusted for population, opioid availability for pain relief and palliative care in poorer countries was 96% lower than in rich ones. In 2024, 87.5% of humanity lived in countries with below-average access. West and Central Africa, the worst-served subregion, had 25 standard daily doses per million people. High-income countries had nearly 18,000.

The reasons include weak supply chains, untrained health workers and entrenched fear of addiction. “Manufacturers in many countries may also avoid producing low-cost options such as morphine, if they are seen as unprofitable,” the report notes.

Prescription opioids, fentanyl in North America and beyond

At the same time, abuse of opoid painkillers laid the groundwork for an epidemic in North America in the first two decades of this century.

Nearly a million people died from opoid overdoses and addiction triggered by easy access to OxyContin, a prescription painkiller derived from the opium poppy.

Members of the Sackler family, whose company, Purdue Pharma, produced OxyContin, never faced criminal charges. Liability suits brought by thousands of people who said they had been wrongfully addicted were settled in civil courts for billions of dollars.

“The opioid crisis in North America, which has been linked to the aggressive marketing and overprescription of pharmaceutical opioids for reasons other than cancer treatment, surgery and palliative care, has also likely raised concerns about the misuse of pharmaceutical opioids in other countries,” the report finds.

Regional distribution of drug seizure cases across leading drug classes, 2024.

Just as awareness of OxyContin abuse grew into a national enforcement and litigation issue, fentanyl was being introduced into the supply of heroin sold on the streets, “with users initially unaware of its presence,” the report recounts.

The synthetic opioid is roughly 50 times stronger than heroin and “significantly cheaper both for producers and for consumers,” the report notes, describing the transformation as evidence that opioid markets “can permanently change.”

The fentanyl crisis defined a generation of American politics and law, filled bestseller lists and television dramas, and at its peak in 2023 killed more Americans in a single year than the entire Vietnam War. The United States, home to about 4% of the world’s population, recorded roughly 110,000 overdose deaths in 2023, according to US health authorities, accounting for roughly 25% of global drug deaths.

Opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyls fell 17% in Canada and by more than a third in the United States in 2024, the first decline in a decade, credited to shrinking supply, wider access to the overdose antidote naloxone and expanded treatment.

If fentanyl were to break out of North America and into the drug markets of other countries at scale, the results would be disasterous the report warns, elevating “levels of harm for those using illegally sourced opioids.”

After fentanyl, something even stronger: nitazenes

Meanwhile, fentanyl’s successors are already circulating, the report finds, and some are even stronger. Nitazenes, a class of synthetic opioids that can exceed fentanyl’s potency, have been identified in 37 countries since 2019, “making them far more geographically widespread than fentanyls ever have been.”

Some nitazene metabolites “may even exceed the potency of the parent compound,” causing respiratory depression so severe it can require repeated doses of naloxone to reverse.

In the United Kingdom, nitazenes were linked to roughly 750 overdose deaths between June 2023 and August 2025, about three times the toll of fentanyl there. In West Africa, nitazenes have turned up in “kush,” a cheap smoked mixture spreading among adolescents; in Guinea, nearly 1% of school students surveyed in 2024 reported using it. A newer class still, the orphines, has surfaced in at least 14 countries.

“We see a lot of nitazenes now,” Chloé Carpentier, the UNODC research chief who coordinated the report, told UN News. “The worry is really that synthetic opioids might replace heroin and lead to much more harm.”

Synthetics: a market that cannot be stopped

Most commonly used stimulant drugs (past-year use), 2024 or most recent year for which data are available.

Plant based drugs continue to dominate – for now

The synthetic takeover is, for now, a threat still largely looming in the future. Plant-based drugs continue to dominate the global trade.

With 256 million users worldwide, cannabis remains by far the most used drug. Production of cocaine, a derivative of the coca plant native to the Andes, meanwhile hit an all-time record of 4,100 tons in 2024, more than four times the level of a decade ago.

Overall, synthetics “are well placed to supplant plant-based drugs; however, to date this seems to be far from the case in practice,” the report finds.

Synthetic drugs need no land, no harvest and no particular climate, and can be made next to their consumers, slashing the risk of interception. The only real constraints, the report finds, are chemical expertise and precursor supplies, “barriers which are too easily overcome in a globalized, digitalized world characterized by the free flow of information and plentiful channels for international trade.”

Since 2014, the international control system has scheduled 92 new psychoactive substances. In 2024 alone, 118 new ones appeared.

The precursor economy has meanwhile pulled drug policy into superpower politics. US intelligence names China and India as the primary sources of fentanyl precursor chemicals, and Washington has designated illicit fentanyl and its core precursors as weapons of mass destruction.

Fentanyl became the formal legal basis of American tariffs on China in 2025, before the Supreme Court struck them down this February, and Beijing has tightened chemical controls in trade-deal instalments after each summit with Washington.

Most precursors in use today are “designer” chemicals not scheduled anywhere, redesigned faster than either government can ban them.

Dictators, insurgents and the drug supply

Estimated global illicit opium production,
2018–2025.

Two political earthquakes, more than any enforcement strategy, are redrawing the world’s drug map. Criminal groups, Juma wrote, “rapidly adjust to changing circumstances.”

The first came from Kabul. The Taliban spent two decades taxing the opium trade to fund their insurgency, then banned it upon taking power. Afghan production, once 80% of the world’s illicit opium, has collapsed 95%, from 6,200 tons in 2022 to an estimated 296 tons in 2025. Heroin prices in 12 major destination markets doubled in two years, to nearly $500 per pure gram, and UNODC estimates Afghan stockpiles could run dry by the end of 2026.

No other producer is filling the gap. Myanmar is now the world’s largest source of opium, but its rise reflects its own civil war, not Afghan shortfalls. Rebuilding poppy fields and smuggling networks is unlikely, the report concludes, and traffickers turning to fentanyls, nitazenes and orphines would be “essentially reshaping global illicit opioid markets.”

History’s most effective supply-side intervention, delivered by an insurgency the drug war was never designed to produce, may end up pushing the world toward far deadlier drugs.

The second earthquake was the fall of Bashar al-Assad in late 2024, which dismantled what had effectively become a narco-state. Syria’s captagon industry, an amphetamine trade researchers valued in the billions of dollars annually, dwarfing the country’s legal exports, grew under regime protection and serviced markets across the Gulf. “The stimulant was used on the battlefield but also found a market in the wider region,” the report notes.

Since December 2024, Syria’s new authorities have dismantled 16 mostly industrial-scale laboratories, and panicked operators dumping stockpiles drove a surge in seizures. The price of a captagon tablet in Lebanon more than doubled, from $2–3 to $5–7.

Methamphetamine is moving into the space captagon left behind. In Saudi Arabia it has taken root among former captagon users and now ranks among the country’s three most used drugs; in Iraq and Türkiye it has become the leading drug of concern in treatment. The two drugs share a precursor chemical, and in 2024 Iraqi authorities dismantled a laboratory in Sulaymaniyah province producing both.

The numbers nobody is counting

People under 25 years of age among people in drug treatment, 2024.

The report’s data has major gaps. It is built on what governments report to Vienna, and much of the world reports little.

The toxicology data behind direct-death estimates come from 66 countries, roughly a third of UN member states, and mostly wealthy ones with functioning death registries. The estimate that one in four people who inject drugs is a woman rests on data from 23 countries.

For amphetamines, one of the world’s most used drug classes, the report concedes the global trend “cannot be calculated” for lack of data. In Africa and Asia, home to billions, data scarcity “prevents a clear understanding” of cocaine use and makes adolescent trends impossible to assess.

The undercounting cuts both ways in time: if some of the decade’s recorded rise in use is simply better counting, the past was darker than the old numbers showed, and the half-million death toll is likely a floor.

“A global map, no matter how detailed, will never fully capture the texture of local realities on the ground,” Juma said at the launch.

Punishment over care

People in the criminal justice system for drug offences, 2024.

Some 5.9 million people came into formal contact with police for drug offences in 2024, 63% of them for possession or personal use. Of 2.2 million people convicted worldwide, more than half were convicted for using drugs or possessing them.

The link between drugs and crime “is best understood as probabilistic rather than deterministic,” the report finds. “Many intoxicated people do not display violent behaviour.”

Civil society groups seized on those numbers at the report’s launch, telling member states that people who use drugs should be “supported and not punished.” Amnesty International used the same week to demand that UN drug control bodies act against the death penalty for drug offences, which it says continues to be applied unlawfully in a string of countries.

Poverty, homelessness and poor mental health, not drug use itself, are the strongest predictors of violence and insecurity, the report’s security chapter concludes, and “the worst security and safety outcomes are avoided when there is sufficient availability of health and social care interventions, including evidence-based drug treatment.”

Its prescription is treatment where there is none, pain relief where it is absent, prevention aimed at the young, and responses “grounded in evidence, centred on people and tailored to local contexts.”

“Only by combining public health, justice and security approaches can we reduce harm, save lives and build safer, healthier and more resilient societies,” Juma wrote.

Image Credits: Fatima Shahid.

HPV vaccination of school girls in Malawi.  The WHO set an ambitious goal of having 90% of girls vaccinated against HPV by 2030. Regionalized vaccines can help meet that target faster.

HPV vaccines have transformed cervical cancer prevention, but the next generation of vaccines must better reflect regional disease patterns, including the HPV35 genotype prevalent in Africa.  

The recent WHO Global Status Report on Cancer paints a sobering picture. Among the many challenges, human papillomavirus, or HPV, is one of the world’s most serious infectious causes of cancer.

Cervical cancer kills hundreds of thousands of women each year, with the greatest burden falling on lower-income countries and regions where screening and treatment are less accessible. Yet much of this disease is preventable. HPV vaccination, combined with screening and treatment, gives the world a credible path toward the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. But elimination efforts will not be equitable or effective if the vaccines available to the highest-burden populations are not designed around the HPV types driving disease in those populations.

 The first HPV vaccines focused on a small number of the most important cancer-causing HPV types. The current 9-valent vaccines have expanded protection and increased potential impact. But HPV genotypes are not distributed evenly across regions. In parts of Africa, particularly southern Africa, the HPV35 genotype appears to be an important contributor to cervical cancer, and disproportionately affects people living with HIV. Yet the HPV vaccines currently used in Africa are not specifically tailored to HPV35. Equity requires more than access to any HPV vaccine; it requires vaccines that are appropriate to the disease patterns of the populations most affected.

Incidence of the HPV 35 genotype, in light turquoise, is significantly higher in Africa than elsewhere in the world.

Beyond the universal vaccine model

HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer.

The default answer in vaccine development has often been to aim for a universal product: one vaccine composition, many countries, and broad coverage. This approach has obvious advantages: easier production, regulation, procurement and introduction into national immunization programs. But universality is not always optimal. More valencies are not automatically better if they do not include the types that matter most in a specific region. That is why a more regionally-tailored approach to HPV vaccine design deserves serious attention.

For Africa, that could mean prioritizing a vaccine that includes HPV35, rather than assuming that the best next product must be a high-valency vaccine designed for every market at once. For other regions, the composition might look different. The principle is straightforward: vaccine design should be guided by the disease burden in the population that will use it.

This is not an argument against broad-spectrum HPV vaccines, but for asking what protection is needed, where, and for whom, and then building the scientific, manufacturing and regulatory pathways that allow those needs to be met.

Start with better evidence

global cervical cancer mortality heat map
Low and middle income countries experience the highest burden of deaths from cervical cancer – with Africa having the highest rates in 2024.

The first requirement is better surveillance. We need better data on HPV genotype distribution across regions, especially in places where cervical cancer incidence and mortality are high. Better surveillance would show where HPV35 and other genotypes are driving disease, making vaccine composition more responsive to disease burden rather than market assumptions.

The second requirement is a manufacturing model that can support regional priorities. Much of the HPV vaccine market has been shaped by large multinational manufacturers. More recently, Indian and Chinese manufacturers have shown growing interest in HPV vaccines, including multivalent products. This is welcome. More suppliers can improve affordability, security of supply and access.

But the regional approach also intersects with the post-COVID-19 push for local manufacturing, particularly in Africa.  Efforts to expand African vaccine manufacturing raise a practical question: what sustained public health products should that capacity produce? A regionally relevant HPV vaccine, including HPV35 where appropriate, could provide a practical use case for building durable manufacturing capacity.

Turning regional priorities into viable products

A new 14-valent jab under development would be the first to cover HPV35.  But more regionally tailored vaccines might be an even better answer – rather than assuming that the best next product must be a high-valency vaccine designed for every market at once.

This will require a clear pathway to be put into place: clear demand signals, priority product profiles, procurement commitments, risk-sharing finance and well-defined regulatory requirements. Here, immunogenicity becomes key. Regulators and developers should work toward allowing immune response data to serve as a surrogate for protection, where scientifically justified. If a vaccine candidate induces an immune response comparable to that seen with existing, protective HPV vaccines, and if the manufacturing quality is robust, this could provide a more feasible route to approval. The regulatory question is how to define the evidence package clearly so developers can invest with confidence.

Manufacturing quality will remain essential. Any regional or locally manufactured HPV vaccine must meet rigorous standards for good manufacturing practice, consistency, validation and quality control. Regionalization cannot become a euphemism for second-tier products. The goal is exactly the opposite: high-quality vaccines designed around the needs of the people who will receive them.

Three priorities for the future 

HPV vaccination coverage by region as of 2024. Africa has moved faster than several other regions – but regionally adapted vaccines would be even more effective.

The future of HPV vaccination should therefore move on three tracks at once.

First, scale up what we already have. Too many girls and young people still do not have access to HPV vaccination. The immediate priority remains expanding coverage through increased financing, procurement, delivery, community trust, and integration into national immunization programs.

Second, improve the evidence base. Better genotype surveillance, especially in Africa and other high-burden settings, should guide future vaccine composition. HPV35 should be treated as a serious priority for Africa.

Third, create a development pathway for regionally appropriate vaccines. That means aligning manufacturers, governments, regulators, funders and public health agencies around realistic product strategies, including African manufacturing capacity where appropriate.

A smarter and more equitable approach

In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer.

The world has an opportunity to be more ambitious and more practical at the same time. HPV vaccines have already shown what prevention can do. The next step is to make sure that vaccine innovation is smarter: driven by the goals of equity and impact, grounded in regional disease patterns, supported by sustainable production, and enabled by rigorous regulatory pathways that are not unnecessarily slow.

 Cervical cancer elimination also requires education, infrastructure, screening, treatment, political will and financing. But vaccine design is key. If HPV35 is helping drive cervical cancer in parts of Africa, future HPV vaccines for Africa should be designed accordingly. The right to health demands more than access to any vaccine; it requires access to prevention tools that are effective, high quality and appropriate to the people and places where the burden is greatest.

 

Dr Marco Cavaleri, Head of Public Health Threats, European Medicines Agency.

 

Image Credits: Nadia Marini/MSF , Wei F, et al, The Lancet, August 3, 2024, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, IARC/WHO, HPV World , WHO, Gavi.

Photograph of the University of Texas at El Paso campus (USA) taken on 6 March 2025.

Record-breaking dust storms sent pollution levels soaring in China and the US-Mexico border region in 2025, disrupting transport, shutting schools and airports, and sending thousands to emergency rooms, according to a new World Meteorological Organization (WMO) report.

Overall, average dust concentrations in 2025 were similar to the previous year, but the regional extremes were severe, the WMO Airborne Dust Bulletin found. It is the tenth in the annual series.

Around 2,000 million tonnes of dust enter the atmosphere each year, with dust storms now affecting more than 150 countries forcing schools, highways and airports to shut down.

“More than 80% of [global dust] originates from the North African and Middle Eastern deserts and can be transported for hundreds and even thousands of kilometres across continents and oceans,” WMO said. “Much of this is a natural process, but poor water and land management, drought and environmental degradation are increasingly to blame.”

The report also lands during a summer of extreme heat around the globe. June 2026 was western Europe’s hottest June on record and the second-warmest June globally, at 1.39°C above the pre-industrial 1850–1900 average, according to the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service.

While dust storms are known to worsen air quality, so do heatwaves. When combined, they are a recipe for disaster, previous WMO reports show

“Sand and dust storms affect air quality and human health. They reduce agricultural productivity, disrupt transport and aviation, strain water and energy systems, and damage ecosystems. No country is immune to their impacts,” said WMO Secretary-General Celeste Saulo.

Natural process worsened by environmental degradation

Anomaly of the annual mean surface dust concentration (in μg m–3) in 2025 relative to the 1981–2010 mean.

Dust and dust storms are a natural process. Major deserts such as the Sahara in Africa, the Gobi in Asia, and the Arabian Desert in the Middle East are the largest sources of dust. Dust is known to travel across countries and continents.

The highest annual mean dust concentrations worldwide remained centred on the Bodélé Depression in Chad, one of the world’s most active dust source regions.

North Africa and the Middle East were hit by a series of major storms between March and May 2025 that harmed air quality and reduced visibility across the region.

In mid-April, a cold front crossing Iraq created hazardous conditions that shut down several airports and resulted in nearly 4,000 people seeking treatment at emergency rooms for respiratory problems, the bulletin said.

A late-April storm in Egypt was more intense still, with visibility in affected areas dropping to just 300 metres, forcing the government to suspend school and university classes.

In East Asia, dust swept from Mongolia across most of China from 10 to 14 April in the country’s most extensive sand and dust storm in a decade, ranked by intensity, reach and duration, WMO said.

The desert border region of Mexico and the United States saw exceptionally frequent, intense and prolonged storms. El Paso, Texas experienced 50 days of dust weather in 2025, more than double the annual average as its 12 dust storms were the most since 1935, at the height of the Dust Bowl.

At the storms’ peak, dust conditions ran for more than six hours — the longest such period in Texas in at least 25 years — with hourly dust pollution readings at the highest measured in the state since hourly monitoring began.

Schools, highways and airports closed, public events were postponed, and blowing dust contributed to multiple fatal road accidents, including a multi-fatality chain-reaction crash at Lordsburg Playa in New Mexico, one of the deadliest stretches of highway in the country for dust.

WMO hopes that having more data and deploying Artificial Intelligence (AI) models will help countries prepare better for dust storms. 

“Because sand and dust storms and droughts do not respect borders, international cooperation is essential,” Saulo said  “Strengthening shared observations, data exchange, and regional forecasting capacity allows all countries, especially the most vulnerable, to benefit from advances in science and early warning.”

Data centre electricity consumption will double by 2030. But solutions exist, experts at an AI for Good panel in Geneva: (L-R) Molly Webb (Energy Unlocked), Laura Schade (UK), Cyrille Brisson (Eaton), Thomas Spencer (IEA), Priyanka Dasgupta (moderator).
Data centre electricity consumption will double by 2030. But solutions exist, experts at an AI for Good panel in Geneva: (L-R) Molly Webb (Energy Unlocked), Laura Schade (UK), Cyrille Brisson (Eaton), Thomas Spencer (IEA), Priyanka Dasgupta (moderator).

The explosive growth of artificial intelligence is siphoning off water and electricity supplies used by communities around the globe, and creating new sources of air pollution and climate emissions from additional power generation. Yet, experts and industry representatives claim that the technology holds the key to mitigating the very crises it compounds. Advanced algorithms are already driving profound environmental solutions, ranging from monitoring municipal water leakages to forecasting renewable energy generation. Efficiency and standardisation issues remain the biggest barriers.

Despite accounting for a relatively small fraction of total global electricity usage today, the growth trajectory of AI is alarming. Projections by the International Energy Agency (IEA) indicate that data centre electricity consumption will double to 950 terawatt-hours by 2030, driven largely by specialised AI workloads and computing facilities.

Last year, data centres consumed about 485 terawatt-hours of electricity globally, representing 1.5 percent of worldwide use.

“We estimate that their electricity consumption increased by 17 percent last year, growing more than five times faster than total electricity consumption,” said IEA-expert Thomas Spencer. He was part of a panel session on data centres’ climate impacts at this week’s AI for Good Summit in Geneva.

From 7 to 10 July, more than 12,000 visitors, experts, regulators and diplomats crowded the hallways of Geneva’s Palexpo exhibition grounds to discuss the potential and limits of AI. The summit was organised by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), alongside 50 UN partner agencies, other UN member states and the private sector.

 

Data centres in the United States, planned, under construction and operational; hyperscale centres concentrated in states like Virginia, Texas and California have raised the most concerns.

This exponential demand in AI energy demand places immense pressure on existing power grids and frequently forces utilities to rely even more on fossil fuels, including dirty diesel backup generators. According to the IEA, some companies in the United States have already begun expanding natural gas-fired capacity to meet the surging demands generated by localised AI data centres.

More immediately, the increasing reliance of data centres on backup diesel generation, which emits toxic particulate air pollution, has stimulated a big backlash from communities and environmental groups in the US, which hosts 37% of the world’s total data centre installations.

The surge in fossil-fuel combustion, in general, threatens climate targets and exacerbates localised air pollution, directly impacting respiratory and cardiovascular health in surrounding communities.

Spatial concentration drives local conflicts

AI data centers consumed about 485 terawatt-hours of electricity globally.
Data centres consumed about 485 terawatt-hours of electricity globally, largely driven by AI expansion.

In local communities, mounting frustration stems primarily from the unique physical footprint of modern digital infrastructure. Unlike traditional industrial facilities, hyperscale AI data centres cluster tightly together and locate themselves near urban populations, experts point out.

“I would summarise the answer to this question as the three S’s: size, speed, and spatial concentration,” said Spencer.

Skybox Power Campus under construction near Austin, Texas, with onsite power infrastructure.

These facilities expand from initial announcements to fully commissioned gigawatt-scale campuses in just two to three years. This rapid development severely outpaces the decades-long planning cycles required to upgrade municipal electrical transmission grids.

The frustration is compounded by frequent opaque governmental decision-making. “There has been a real lack of transparency and a lot of secrecy around some of these data centres,” explained climate expert Molly Webb, CEO of the NGO Energy Unlocked.

Evaporative cooling strains water supplies of local communities

Due to its high-energy demand, AI expansion is compounding energy and water crises.
Due to its high-energy demand, AI expansion is compounding energy and water crises.

Consequently, data centres overwhelm local utility networks and compete directly with residents for essential resources like water as well as energy supplies.

A single 100-megawatt hyperscale facility can consume 2.5 billion litres of water annually, drawing directly from municipal drinking supplies, according to a 2025 report by the UK Government Digital Sustainability Alliance (GDSA). This volume is equivalent to the daily water needs of approximately 80,000 people.

Communities view some of these AI data centres as a direct threat to public health. When municipal water systems collapse under the strain, the immediate casualties are local sanitation and hospital operations.

UN urges recognition of water bankruptcy

The Mesa Data Centre near Phoenix, Ariz. Two-thirds of U.S. data centres built or in development since 2022 are in water-stressed areas.

Meanwhile, the world has entered the era of global water bankruptcy, a crisis threatening Sustainable Development Goal 3 for good health and well-being, and Goal 6 for clean water and sanitation. The UN has urged states to formally recognise that human-water systems have exceeded their hydrological limits and sustained irreversible damage.

Attempting to manage this reality with crisis tools alone produces escalating emergency costs, deepening ecological damage, and rising social conflict and inequality, the 2026 UN Global Water Bankruptcy report states.

According to the UK GDSA report, policymakers should adopt a water protocol that requires data centre operators to face stringent new barriers to entry. Facilities could be forced to secure non-potable water sources or invest heavily in dry-cooling architecture before receiving construction permits.

See related story.

World Enters New Era of Water Crisis, UN Says

Innovation for sustainable cooling systems

Reacting to the public pushback, the technology industry is developing less resource-intensive systems. Many hyperscale developers have begun implementing closed-loop cooling systems in new facility designs.

These closed water systems drastically cut consumption, offering a vital improvement over traditional evaporative cooling.

However, these systems require facilities to consume more electricity to cool the hardware, creating a difficult environmental trade-off, according to Cyrille Brisson, global data centre expert at the private company Eaton.

“When you want to eliminate water usage you have to consume more power… if you want to go zero water you worsen your power usage effectiveness,” said Brisson.

Data centres require vast amounts of energy to sustain system cooling.
Data centres require vast amounts of energy to sustain system cooling. The industry is looking for new solutions to increase efficiency.

Making AI more energy efficient

Simultaneously, hardware manufacturers are pushing the thermal limits of their processors to eliminate water consumption through evaporation.

Breakthrough architectures now utilise liquid coolants operating at 45 degrees Celsius, allowing facilities to manage heat without activating mechanical chillers. These high-temperature systems also can enable developers to recover waste heat for neighbouring residential buildings, transforming a major energy liability into a community asset.

Despite these advancements, industry experts note that such innovations remain geographically dependent, as facilities in warmer regions still require chillers during peak summer heat.

Reducing AI complexity to save power

AI data centres perform billions of mathematical operations, often leading to inefficiencies.
AI data centres perform billions of mathematical operations per prompt, often leading to inefficiencies – as well as outsized consumption of energy and water.

To meet these sustainability challenges, independent developers are also simplifying the trillions of mathematical calculations per AI prompt. During the summit’s Resilient AI Challenge, global teams proved that sophisticated optimisation can drastically shrink the hardware and energy requirements of generative models.

When developers combine mathematical simplification (quantization) with smaller, task-specific models and optimised user prompts and responses, the computational burden drops drastically. Together, these approaches can reduce the energy required for AI systems by up to 90% for specialised and routine tasks, according to a UNESCO report, referenced by UNESCO assistant director-general Gabriela Ramos.

Independent developers are practically demonstrating these efficiency techniques in real-world scenarios. For example, a joint research team from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Beijing Forestry University successfully dropped a model’s inference energy consumption by nearly 70%.

This shift not only slashes electricity demand but also democratises access, allowing hospitals and municipalities in lower- and middle-income countries to run AI locally on affordable hardware.

Can AI also help mitigate climate and pollution crises?

Solar-powered data centres have potential but also face significant challenges including land requirements, intermittent energy production, and grid integration issue.

Eventually, AI technology should serve as a potent tool for climate mitigation, experts also contend. The IEA projects that AI applications could reduce global emissions by up to 1.4 gigatons by 2035 through more systemic energy optimisation. AI can drive profound water waste solutions, ranging from monitoring municipal water leakages and optimising crop irrigation, to cleaning water supplies and improving extreme weather forecasting.

“We should stop seeing data centres just in terms of energy demand, but we should look at them in terms of systems that can enable decarbonisation,” said Laura Schade, a senior engineer at the UK Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, speaking at the AI for Good panel.

Advanced algorithms process vast amounts of satellite and sensor data to forecast renewable energy generation with unprecedented accuracy. This predictive capability allows grid operators to integrate wind and solar power seamlessly, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

Data centres themselves are also evolving into active grid participants rather than passive energy drains. By adjusting their computational workloads during peak hours, facilities can stabilise volatile renewable grids through instant flexibility.

Battery energy storage systems can replace diesel generators during outages, avoiding high pollution. And finally, pairing renewable microgrids with data centre development can integrate clean power from the get-go, notes the World Resources Institute, in a recent policy brief.

Supporting that, government regulatory processes should require companies to disclose on-site power strategies and evaluate cleaner alternatives during planning, review and permitting. At the same time, the nature of solar’s intermittent energy production also poses challenges for developing data centres entirely around solar-power.

The standardisation bottleneck

 

AI data centres are concentrated in China, South-East Asia, North America and Europe. In the coming years, a massive scale-up is expected across the globe.
Experts point to the need for standardisation, with a massive global scale-up of AI data centres expected across the globe.

However, industry representatives warn that uncoordinated national regulations could also slow more sustainable deployment of data centres.

“What I dread is having a different standard by country because that’s what’s slowing down deployment of innovation tremendously,” said Eaton’s Brisson.

To prevent bottlenecks, the Swiss-based nonprofit International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is accelerating the update of 50 data centre safety and electrical standards into a two-year timeframe. A process that historically took decades, but that is now accelerated due to the explosive expansion of AI.

Beyond hardware, the implementation of sustainable AI in developing nations frequently stalls due to poor data quality. This threatens to increase the digital divide between the global north and the global south.

“The binding constraint was never the algorithm, it was the data standardisation,” said Gyungah Kim, manager at the Korea International Cooperation Agency at the summit.

Sustainability: A defining measure of excellence

The debates in Geneva reflect a maturation of the AI industry, moving past speculative hype toward concrete implementation. Companies and governments must now develop and implement robust regulatory guardrails and demand-side measures to react to public distrust and frustration.

Otherwise, the AI revolution risks further accelerating the very climate and resource crises it currently promises to solve, a sentiment echoed by UNESCO assistant director-general Ramos.

“Sustainability must become a defining measure of AI excellence,” she said.

Image Credits: European Union, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, WRI , International Energy Agency, Steve Heap/Shutterstock, Luis Tosta via Unsplash, Around the World Photos/Shutterstock , Matheus Bertelli via Pexels, Data Center Knowledge / Alamy.

Women wait to be screened for breast and cervical cancer at the RAiSE Foundation center in Niger State.  Across the continent, however, access to cancer screening and diagnosis remains patchy and inconsistent.

Africa can no longer afford to manage cancer care as a perpetual crisis. Instead, policy leaders must recognize this crisis for what it truly is: the ultimate ‘stress test’ for national health systems.  The WHO Global Status Report on Cancer, published this week, highlights the persistent inequities in access to timely cancer diagnosis and treatment and disproportionately high levels of cancer mortality across the continent. When a system is overwhelmed, it reveals deep-seated fractures in how we finance health as a whole. But this is not just a fiscal failure; it is a human one.

Across Africa, late cancer diagnosis continues to place a devastating financial burden on families, many of whom delay seeking care because treatment remains unaffordable and out of reach. By then, care becomes more complex, survival is less likely, and the economic consequences extend far beyond the patient herself. Families are forced to make terrible choices between putting food on the table or seeking lifesaving health interventions. Children leave school. Health systems absorb escalating costs that could have been prevented through earlier intervention.

This individual suffering is the precursor to a looming regional emergency: by 2030, non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including cancer, are expected to become the leading cause of death in many African countries.

If our current fragmented and underfunded models cannot withstand the pressure today, they will certainly collapse under the weight of tomorrow’s demands. The debate now is not whether Africa can afford to invest in cancer care. It is whether the continent can afford not to.

The Hidden Cost of Inaction

Cervical cancer screening lags far behind in Africa, Asia and parts of the Middle East.

The economic cost of inaction is already severe. Research by the WifOR Institute estimates that between 2017 and 2023, HER2-positive breast cancer alone resulted in more than US$10 billion in lost productivity across seven African countries. Nearly 90% of these losses affected women in their prime working years. When women are excluded from the workforce, households become more vulnerable, businesses lose productivity, and economies slow down.

At the same time, treating advanced cancer can cost up to ten times more than investing in early screening and prevention. Continuing to finance cancer care primarily at the point of crisis is therefore not only inequitable but also economically unsustainable.

This urgency shaped discussions at the recent World Health Summit Regional Meeting in Nairobi, where policymakers, clinicians, patient advocates, and health financing experts converged around a common conclusion: Africa must move from crisis spending to long-term, strategic investment in cancer care.

Innovation in Action: African-Led Solutions

A health worker in Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, prepares to give students at St Augustine School the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Post-COVID African rates of HPV vaccination have increased.

Africa is already demonstrating real-world solutions.

Côte d’Ivoire has demonstrated one of the boldest financing innovations on the continent by converting national debt into a €400 million “health dividend.” By restructuring expensive commercial debt into long-term concessional financing backed by a World Bank guarantee, the government unlocked savings that were ring-fenced for health and education investments. The approach has already helped expand oncology capacity and improve outcomes, including reductions in breast cancer mortality.

The significance of this model goes beyond debt restructuring. It reframes health financing as a sovereign economic strategy rather than a social expenditure.

Kenya is taking a different but equally important path. Through the Social Health Authority reforms, cancer care is increasingly being integrated into national financing systems as an essential service rather than an afterthought. Strategic purchasing mechanisms are beginning to align financing with population health needs while protecting households from catastrophic out-of-pocket spending.

In Ghana, policymakers recognized that high-cost chronic diseases cannot sustainably depend on general insurance pools alone. Dedicated financing mechanisms for cancer and other NCDs are now helping strengthen sustainable financing while maintaining strong investments in prevention and early screening.

Nigeria, meanwhile, is demonstrating how blended finance and patient capital can expand treatment access. Investments through the Sovereign Investment Authority are supporting world-class treatment infrastructure while lowering long-term costs through technology and scale.

These models differ in structure, but they share the same objective of making cancer care more accessible, affordable, and sustainable.

Beyond the Hospital Walls: Integrating Care

lung cancer
X-ray image of a chest with a potentially cancerous growth.  Critical cancer diagnostics are lacking  in many primary and secondary health care facilities.

However, financing reform alone is not enough.

Cancer care cannot succeed if it remains disconnected from broader primary healthcare systems. Countries that integrate screening, referral systems, diagnostics, and long-term follow-up into primary healthcare are not only improving outcomes but are also building more efficient systems overall.

This is particularly important in Africa, where many women first interact with the health system through maternal and reproductive healthcare services. Integrating cancer screening into these existing platforms creates opportunities for earlier detection while reducing duplication and costs.

But even the best financing models will fail if access remains unequal. As participants repeatedly emphasized during discussions in Nairobi, innovation without access is exclusion. Too many patients still travel long distances for care. Too many are diagnosed late because services are centralized in urban areas. Too many families continue to shoulder hidden costs beyond treatment itself, such as transport, accommodation, lost wages, and caregiving responsibilities.

This is why cancer financing must ultimately be judged not by the size of budgets announced, but by whether it changes the patient’s experience. Does it reduce the financial burden on families? Does it improve survival? Does it bring care closer to communities? If the answer is no, then the system is still failing the people it is meant to serve.

The Prevention Dividend

Healthy diets, including micronutrient rich seeds, legumes and vegetables as well as protein, are an important cancer prevention strategy – but out of reach for one-third of the world’s population or more.

Africa does not lack solutions. It lacks financing systems designed to scale and sustain them.

The shift toward prevention-first systems is not simply good public health policy. It is smart economics. Expanding HPV vaccination, integrating cervical cancer screening into primary healthcare, and strengthening community-based early detection can dramatically reduce long-term treatment costs while saving lives. Prevention remains one of the most underfinanced yet highest-return investments in Africa’s health systems.

Prevention must also extend beyond healthcare services alone. Policies that address the commercial determinants of health, including unhealthy diets, tobacco, alcohol, and harmful trans-fats, are equally critical to reducing the long-term burden of non-communicable diseases and protecting future generations.

To protect these future generations, the time for fragmented programs has passed. Governments, financiers, development partners, civil society and the private sector must now move with far greater urgency to expand domestic financing, scale blended investment models, and build cancer financing systems grounded in African realities rather than disconnected programs. Every delayed reform means more preventable deaths, more families pushed into poverty, and greater economic losses for countries already under pressure. Ultimately, Africa’s future will depend not only on how we treat cancer, but on how urgently we choose to prevent and finance it differently. Shifting from crisis spending to strategic investment is the only path toward a resilient and prosperous continent.

Dr Rispah Walumbe, is the Head of Strategy, Institutional Performance and Policy at Amref Health Africa.

Dr. Paul Chilwesa is the Head- Policy, Population Health & Health Systems Strengthening,  at Roche Africa

 

Image Credits: Etinosa Yvonne/WHO, N. Broutet/WHO, Gavi, National Cancer Institute/Unsplash, FAO/State of Food Security and Nutrition (2025) .

Confirmed cases in DRC rose 25% in a week to 1,759, with 600 dead, as a new UNDP assessment projects the epidemic could push nearly a million people into poverty.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo’s Ebola outbreak is the fastest-growing on record, Africa CDC told its weekly briefing on Wednesday, with confirmed cases up 25% over the past week to 1,759 and deaths reaching 600.

The outbreak’s reproductive number is 1.4, meaning every 10 infections lead to roughly 14 more, while the case fatality rate is 34%, officials said. At Africa CDC’s previous press conference a week earlier, on 30 June, the toll stood at 1,406 cases and 438 deaths.

“The virus is still ahead of our response,” said Wessam Mankoula, who heads the continental Incident Management Support Team coordinating the response for Africa CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO). “However, the window of opportunity is still open.”

The WHO declared the outbreak, caused by the Bundibugyo strain, a public health emergency of international concern on 17 May. No licensed vaccine or treatment exists for the strain, while a therapeutics trial began at an undisclosed site in Ituri, Africa CDC said last week.

“We need to go ahead of the virus,” Mankoula said. “And to go ahead of the virus, we need more resources.”

An economic emergency beyond health

A UN Development Programme assessment released this week warned the outbreak could push 985,000 more people into poverty and cost African economies up to $3.6 billion if regional and global shocks intensify.

Even if the virus is contained in the DRC and Uganda, UNDP projects DRC losses above $1 billion in GDP and 55,000 jobs. The poorest fifth of households face a 1.76% drop in daily consumption, “a loss that erases fragile development gains and threatens to create a long-term poverty crisis,” UNDP said.

“The results tell a clear story about the Africa-wide development cost of the outbreak. Even without widespread transmission, the economic consequences of the Ebola outbreak extend well beyond the epicentre, affecting output, employment, investment, and household welfare across the continent,” the analysis found. “When compounded by global shocks, these pressures intensify and spread further… In all scenarios, the burden falls disproportionately on the most vulnerable households

Women, who dominate informal cross-border trade and the frontline care workforce responding to the outbreak, carry the heaviest burden and “heightened risk” of direct exposure to the Ebola virus, the report said.

“Ebola does not stop at the hospital gate. It affects livelihoods, education, food security, trade, public finances and trust,” said Ahunna Eziakonwa, UNDP’s regional director for Africa. “If we treat this Ebola outbreak solely as a health challenge, we risk missing the much larger development emergency unfolding around it.”

Diverted health services could also cause up to 2,520 excess infant deaths from non-Ebola causes, the report found.

The outbreak “signals a complex development emergency in the sub-region, one that cannot be addressed by exclusively focusing on the health sector,” the report said.

Spread and surveillance

The outbreak spans three provinces and 37 health zones in the DRC, with 94% of cases in Ituri. Six zones have reported no confirmed cases in 21 days. Women account for 53% of infections, most among people aged 15 to 44.

Treatment capacity has nearly doubled to about 800 beds from 460 two weeks ago, but occupancy holds near 95%, and tops 137% in North Kivu.

“Urgently, we need to increase bed capacity by at least 50% immediately to isolate those cases,” Mankoula said. “Any delay in the isolation of suspected and confirmed cases contributes to the spread of the disease.”

The highest fatality rates are in North Kivu, where insecurity blocks responders: 51% in Katwa and 43% in Beni. “Because of security challenges, we are not able to surge our response capacity in North Kivu,” Mankoula said.

Just 32% of new cases come from known contact lists, against a 90% target, and each case is linked to only seven contacts. More than half of cases are flagged only after 72 hours of symptoms. “While progress has been made, key bottlenecks persist, including access to workforce, which currently challenges contact tracing and case investigation efforts,” Africa CDC said, adding that it is deploying 4,000 community health workers as part of a 20,000-strong target with WHO and UNICEF to shore up contact tracing.

Uganda, by contrast, has all but contained its outbreak: 17 of 20 cases have recovered, one remains in hospital, and contact tracing is complete, officials said. “Uganda is still demonstrating that Ebola can be controlled,” Mankoula said.

Workers strike as dangers mount

Wessam Mankoula, who heads the continental Incident Management Support Team coordinating the response for Africa CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO).

Frontline Ebola responders in Ituri walked off the job this week over unpaid wages. Surveillance teams, security staff, community mobilisers and burial teams are among those striking, demanding pay owed since the outbreak was declared on 15 May, according to the Associated Press.

Mankoula said Africa CDC was in touch with the government to fast-track payments, while urging development partners who had pledged to financially assist the response to speed up disbursement. Around 21% of a pledged $1 billion has been disbursed, Mankoula said. The Ebola response needs $518 million, and the wider humanitarian bill exceeds $800 million.

“We are urging all partners and donors to fast-track the disbursement of those resources quickly,” he said. “We need a decent work environment for our frontline healthcare workers who are fighting this growing Ebola outbreak.”

The agency has released $2 million to the DRC, some of which can cover the delayed payments, he added.

Attack on Ebola Hospital in Eastern Congo Echoes Past Violence Against Health Workers

As checks fail to clear, the dangers to medical responders are also growing increasingly deadly. In the current outbreak, 112 health workers have been infected, and 35 have died from exposure to the virus, as health staff risk their lives without pay, frustrating the workforce.

Ebola responses in eastern DRC carry a violent history. At least 25 health workers were killed, and more than 450 acts of violence or threats against them were recorded during the 2018-2020 Kivu epidemic, when 171 health workers also contracted the virus. Shades of that violence have resurfaced in recent weeks, as civilians set fire to Ebola treatment camps across Kivu province.

Mankoula said misinformation continues to drive attacks on responders, as communities continue to doubt the very existence of Ebola and resist safe-burial practices, which require the difficult step of separating a family from their loved one when they pass away, due to the virus remaining contagious after people pass away. The extent of the mistrust is deep, with one Lancet study

A Lancet Infectious Diseases study conducted in Beni and Butembo following the 2018 outbreak found that one in four respondents believed the Ebola outbreak was not real, and that such beliefs were strongly associated with a “decreased likelihood of adopting preventive behaviours, including acceptance of Ebola vaccines.”

“We need more community health workers deployed urgently, and we need to keep protecting our healthcare workers by spreading accurate information, not contributing to misinformation and disinformation, and by making personal protective equipment available to avoid infection,” Mankoula said.

Health workers at Juba Teaching Hospital are waiting in line to have their first shot of COVID-19 vaccine in October 2021, months after millions of people in high income countries had already received the jabs.

As the WHO Intergovernmental Working Group reconvenes in Geneva in the quest to nail down an accord on Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS), the former President of Botswana and the President of AIDS Healthcare Foundation argue that this critical annex to the 2025 Pandemic Agreement needs to ensure benefit-sharing commitments are just as mandatory and enforceable as commitments around rapid and transparent pathogen sharing. 

During the COVID-19 pandemic, inequities were manifested not only through the hoarding of lifesaving technology by rich countries, but also through the unlawful isolation of countries that did the right thing. 

In late 2021, scientists in Botswana first identified and reported a concerning new coronavirus variant, Omicron, which was subsequently identified in South Africa. The two countries had detected, sequenced, and shared the genomic sequence and pathogen samples, only to have their borders closed to the world within days through unfair travel bans that immediately deepened the damage to their economies.

A molecular model of the Omicron subvariant BA.2, which evolved in 2022 from the original Omicron variant first identified in Botswana in 2021.

In December 2021, as the Omicron wave spread, governments convened the Second Special Session of the World Health Assembly (WHA), only the second such session in WHO’s history. They analyzed not only the state of the pandemic but how the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR), which set a binding legal framework for preventing and responding to the international spread of disease across their 196 States Parties, were not working. The central outcome was a decision to open negotiations on a new global agreement to prevent, prepare for, and respond to pandemics—the Pandemic Agreement.

After more than three years of negotiations at WHO in Geneva, the Pandemic Agreement was adopted in May 2025. One critical piece was left unfinished: the annex operationalizing Article 12 on Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS). This article is meant to correct a critical failure that COVID-19 laid bare: pathogens and sequence data flowed quickly out of the countries that detected them, but the vaccines and treatments developed from the use of this information did not flow back on an equal footing, deepening a crisis that cost millions of lives and trillions of dollars.

The PABS System is one mechanism through which the Agreement gives concrete meaning to equity. It ties each country’s duty to detect and share pathogen samples and genomic sequence information to a corresponding duty on participating manufacturers who profit from that access to provide a share of the vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics (VTDs) they produce, along with licensing and financial contributions.

Mandatory to share, optional to give back

Duty to share data on pathogens is being written into the PABS agreement as mandatory.  Seen here, a computer visualization of a DNA sequence. Viruses, like hantavirus and bundibugyo, however, are comprised of RNA sequences, which use uracil, instead of thymine as one of the four base chemicals.

While initially guided by noble objectives to ensure universal and equitable access to build a more resilient and equitable global health architecture, leading developed countries have since taken positions that oppose the basic provisions needed to operationalize the Agreement’s core commitments. What is being resisted is not a technical detail. It is not about charity either.

While the duty to share pathogens is being written into the Agreement as mandatory and enforceable upon states, rich countries are pushing for the corresponding benefit-sharing obligations to be kept deliberately “soft” and unenforceable. The result is a structural asymmetry where samples must flow to private companies, but VTDs are not guaranteed to flow back. The text of Article 12 guarantees minimum shares to be donated and sold at cost to WHO in the event of a pandemic emergency, but no such obligations have been agreed upon when it comes to interpandemic periods or Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEICs), where access to medical countermeasures is most critical to prevent the spread of deadly pathogens.

No one negotiates fairly in an emergency

COVAX
Some of the initial  COVID vaccine deliveries arriving in Africa in May, 2021 – too little too late.

Benefit-sharing obligations for participating manufacturers and other commercial users who profit from the system must be made concrete and binding in the text of the Agreement. This must be agreed upon upfront and not deferred to subsequent bilateral talks between WHO and manufacturers, as rich countries have suggested.

Holding these negotiations once a crisis is underway is not only a tactical mistake but also inconsistent with the text of Article 12, which requires that access and benefit sharing be secured on an equal footing. This means that a percentage of VTDs must be guaranteed not only once a pandemic is declared, but set aside for stockpiling during interpandemic periods and for deployment once a PHEIC is declared—as has happened several times since the pandemic, in the case of mpox in 2024, for instance, and in May, for the Ebola Bundibugyo virus outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo.  

It also means ensuring pre-negotiated licenses, the transfer of technology and know-how that let developing countries produce for themselves rather than wait for donations, and annual contributions from participating manufacturers and others who profit from the use of the PABS System.

HIV showed what waiting costs

International AIDS Conference “Keep the Promise” march in Durban, South Africa, led by AIDS Healthcare Foundation in 2016 – 14 years after AHF opened its first international clinic -as low-income countries belatedly gained access to ARVs.

The debate over PABS echoes lessons learned from the global HIV/AIDS response. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, lifesaving antiretroviral medicines transformed HIV from a death sentence into a manageable chronic disease—but only for those who could afford them. While people in high-income countries gained access, millions in low- and middle-income countries continued to die as treatment remained out of reach.

It took years of grassroots advocacy, political leadership, voluntary licensing, generic competition, and unprecedented international cooperation to expand access and begin closing that gap. The world should not repeat the mistake of treating equitable access as an afterthought. If countries are expected to share the pathogens that make medical breakthroughs possible, then the benefits of those breakthroughs must also be shared in a timely, predictable, and equitable manner.

A public good cannot rest on unequal obligations

Meeting of the Intergovermmental Working Group (IGWG) on a PABS annex in March, 2026

The Pandemic Agreement should therefore be understood not only as an instrument of global health security, but as a global public good. Its value depends on being available to all countries, because the benefits of early detection, rapid sharing of information, timely access to medical countermeasures, and stronger regional capacities cannot be confined within national borders. But a global public good cannot rest on unequal obligations. If all countries are expected to contribute to collective protection by sharing pathogens and data, then all countries must also be guaranteed fair, timely, and enforceable access to the benefits that such sharing makes possible.

No country can wall itself off from a pandemic. This is perhaps the last chance the world has to address the systemic inequality in the current global public health order for a long time. Giving in to pressure from corporate interests and profit motives at this point is beyond foolish. If we fail to enshrine equity as a fundamental principle of global public health, all countries will be forced to pay many times over. That is why an equitable Pandemic Agreement must be treated as a true global public good. The negotiations have been long, difficult, and contentious. Developing countries should not shy away from standing for what is right, while developed countries must find the wherewithal to do the right thing.

Mokgweetsi Masisi is the former President of Botswana (2018-2024) and a member of the Club de Madrid.

Michael Weinstein is the President of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF).

 

 

Image Credits: Delthia Ricks/Twitter, Gerald Barber, Virginia Tech (with permission of the National Science Foundation), UNICEF, AIDS Healthcare Foundation , WHO / Mark Nieuwenhof.

Millions of people are facing physical, emotional and financial toll of cancer, finds latest WHO report.

By 2050 there will be 35 million cancer cases annually – a 66.7% increase in incidence from 2024.

That is, unless urgent action is taken to improve prevention and access to early diagnosis and treatment, according to a report released Wednesday by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Currently, cancer kills 26,000 people daily and is the second leading cause of death after cardiovascular disease. Fewer than one in three countries include cancer care in their universal health coverage (UHC) packages.

Presently, there are an estimated 20.6 million new cases and close to 10 million deaths annually.

A silver lining is that key policy interventions have led to a 27% decline in tobacco use worldwide since 2010, contributing to reductions in lung cancer cases and deaths in some regions.

But other key preventive measures, including obesity, infections and obsessive alcohol consumption need more assertive action – along with even more progress on tobacco.:

These are the takeaways of the Global Status Report on Cancer 2026 jointly developed with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

“Cancer is a deeply personal disease that touches nearly all of us. But whether a person survives cancer should never depend on where they were born or what they earn,” said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Cancer remains a global health priority.

According to the report, based on data from 2024, “the leading contributors to cancer cases globally were tobacco use, infections, alcohol consumption, and high body-mass index (BMI) accounting for 15%, 10%, 3% and 2% of all new cancer cases, respectively.”

The report also highlights persistent inequities in access to timely cancer diagnosis and treatment.  While 87% of women with breast cancer survive five years after their diagnosis in high-income countries, only about 42% do so in low-income countries, the report finds.

In terms of infections, human papillomavirus (HPV) is a leading cause of cervical cancer – another leading killer of women in low-income countries who lack access to regular cervical cancer screenings. While HPV vaccine uptake has increased, there are still wide gaps in coverage especially in large parts of Africa, the Middle-East and Asia.

“The inequities documented in this report are not inevitable; they are the consequence of choices, and they can be reversed through stronger and unified action,” Tedros said.

The report is the first comprehensive analysis of the global status of cancer prevention and control, projections of future trends – and progress made since 2010, the baseline year chosen for the analysis.

Along with the progress seen on tobacco, alcohol consumption has fallen, but only marginally, and screenings for breast as well as cervical cancer have improved in both high and low-income countries.

Asia, Europe have large cancer burden

Global incidence of cancer by continent in 2024.

In 2024, Asia accounted for the largest share of cancer cases, with more than half of all cancer cases (50.7%) and deaths (56.5%), reflecting its large population.

Europe too carried a disproportionately high burden, contributing 21% of global cases and 20% of deaths despite having only about 9% of the world’s population. In contrast, many countries in Africa and parts of Asia experience lower incidence but disproportionately high mortality. 

Nearly four in ten cancer cases globally are linked to preventable risk factors, particularly infections such as human papillomavirus (HPV), hepatitis B and C, and helicobacter pylori, alcohol, tobacco use, high body mass index and insufficient physical activity, highlighting the critical role of prevention. 

Not all preventable risk factors are receiving enough attention, experts noted.

“For obesity, for example, a lot of the prevention strategies that exist today have been implemented or taken in high-income countries, mainly, while in the low and middle-income countries, we see the take-up of these programmes are then much less,” Dr Isabelle Soerjomataram, Deputy Head of the IARC Cancer Surveillance Unit said, speaking at a press conference to launch the report.

Gendered impact of the disease

While lung cancer is the most common form of cancer in men, it is breast cancer in women.

Among the different types of cancer, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death globally.

Overall, lung, prostate and colorectal cancers are among the most common cancers in men, while breast, lung and colorectal cancers account for a substantial share of the burden among women. 

Cancer still carries stigma, especially for women.

“After my own double mastectomy, I struggled with body image, but I knew that that surgery had given me the best chance at life. Yet I met four women who chose to die rather than lose a breast to breast cancer. That is the devastating power of stigma,” said Abigail Simon-Hart, a breast cancer survivor and patient advocate.

Experts drew attention to the impact on men as well. “There’s also the very real impact of cancer on men, and that age-standardized incidence rates for cancer in men is higher, and many men are also being left behind,” said Dr Andre Ilbawi, Team Lead for Cancer Control, WHO.

Major gains but gaps persist 

Patients listen as a staff nurse explains the screening process before they register to be screened for breast and cervical cancer at the RAiSE Foundation center in Niger State on 23 February 2021.

The report notes substantial gains in key policy areas. Apart from the decline in tobacco use contributing to the reduction in lung cancer cases and deaths in some regions, infection-related cancers are also decreasing thanks. This is due to the expanding vaccination coverage and improved water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) as well as infection prevention and control.

Around 82% of countries now have national cancer control plans, up from 50% in 2010.

In high-income countries, early detection programmes catch most breast cancers and 74% of women have been screened for cervical cancer.

Scientific innovation is accelerating; registered clinical trials have increased at an annual rate of 7.3% between 2005 and 2021.

But essential cancer medicines remain out of reach for many. Availability of the top 20 priority cancer medicines ranges from just 9% to 54% in low- and lower-middle-income countries, compared with 68% to 94% in high-income countries. And the consequences of these gaps are felt most acutely by people living with cancer and their families.

Toll on caregivers, community

Dr Andre Ilbawi, Team Lead for Cancer Control, WHO

Cancer care remains financially and socially devastating for many households.

At least 45% experience financial hardship, more than half report mental health challenges, and nearly all caregivers report strain including unpaid services and social isolation, the WHO’s first-ever survey of people affected by cancer found that covered 4,000 people across 116 countries.

“To succeed against cancer, we must continue to focus on technological innovation, and we must also create the conditions that empower and care for people more holistically,” Ilbawi said.

Image Credits: WHO/Yasin Abdullahi, Unsplash/National Cancer Institute, Global status report on cancer 2026, Etinosa Yvonne/WHO.