Controversial US-Backed Vaccination Study Begins in Guinea-Bissau Public Health 07/01/2026 • Kerry Cullinan Share this: Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to print (Opens in new window) Print US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. A US government-funded trial on the timing of hepatitis B vaccinations, which will delay vaccination for up to 7,000 newborns in Guinea-Bissau, started this week. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has awarded a controversial Danish research group a $1,6 million five-year grant to study the “optimal timing and delivery of monovalent hepatitis B vaccinations on newborns in Guinea-Bissau”, according to the US Health and Human Services’ (HHS) federal register. The trial aims to enrol 14,000 newborns in a “randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of neonatal Hepatitis B vaccination on early-life mortality, morbidity, and long-term developmental outcomes”, according to HHS register. Half of the babies will get vaccinated at birth, while the other half will get vaccinated six weeks later. However, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has recommended hepatitis B vaccinations since 1992, and universal birth vaccinations from 2009. The vaccination is usually given as a series of three or four injections, and several clinical trials have already established the best intervals for the vaccinations. “[Robert F Kennedy Jr], the Secretary of Health and Human Services, will soon conduct his own Tuskegee experiment,” US paediatrician Dr Paul Offit, co-inventor of a rotavirus vaccine, wrote this week on his Substack platform. “He has chosen the resource-poor nation of Guinea-Bissau, West Africa, to do it. Guinea-Bissau is currently overwhelmed by hepatitis B virus. About 18% of the population is infected. The World Health Organization (WHO) strongly recommends that all children in all countries receive a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine to prevent mother-to-child transmission,” added Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a professor of both Paediatrics and Vaccinology at the University of Pennsylvania. https://t.co/D7Ugn9a3J5 RFK Jr. is about to launch a dangerously unethical experiment in West Africa pic.twitter.com/BmW8JhcKCB — Paul Offit (@DrPaulOffit) January 6, 2026 Tuskegee refers to a 40-year US study that withheld syphilis treatment from 399 African Americans between 1932 and 1972 to observe the effects of the disease when untreated. Hepatitis B virus is an extremely contagious virus that infects the liver. It is transmitted through blood and bodily fluids and can be transmitted sexually, through contaminated needles, and – most commonly – to babies during birth from an infected mother. It is the leading cause of liver cancer worldwide. Controversial Danish researchers The CDC grant has been awarded to the Bandim Health Project at the University of Southern Denmark, which is led by controversial married couple Dr Christine Stabell Benn and Dr Peter Aaby. Stabell Benn is an adviser to the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which recently resolved to stop recommending hepatitis B vaccines to US newborns. ACIP has advised that it is up to parents to decide on the vaccination. US newborns have been vaccinated against hepatitis B since 1991, and this policy has reduced infections in children by 99%. Stabell Benn and Aaby’s research has focused on the “non-specific effects” (NSE) of vaccines. They have conducted trials involving thousands of children in Guinea-Bissau and Denmark, and assert that all vaccines should also be tested for NSEs. However, the journal Vaccine recently published a comprehensive review of 13 trials conducted by their research group, Bandim, which showed that their trials have been unable to show non-specific effects for measles, tuberculosis, diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough vaccines. “We were surprised to find several instances of questionable research practices, such as unpublished primary outcomes, outcome switching, reinterpretation of trials based on statistically fragile subgroup analyses, and frequent promotion of cherry-picked secondary findings as causal, even when primary outcomes yielded null results,” according to the review, which was headed by Dr Henrik Støvring of the Department of Biomedicine, at Aarhus University in Denmark. Enrolment before new policy rollout Currently, babies in Guinea-Bissau only receive the hepatitis B vaccination from six weeks’ old. But some 11% of children in the country are already infected with hepatitis B by the age of 18 months, so the government has resolved to introduce vaccination at birth from 2027, as recommended by the WHO. The hepatitis B vaccine is delivered in a series of three or four injections. When given within 24 hours of birth, the vaccine is up to 90% effective in preventing mother-to-child infection. Bandim says its trial will stop enrolling participants when the government rollout of the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns starts. They will follow their cohort for five years, primarily to compare “overall mortality and hospitalisations,” and “secondary outcomes”, looking at “atopic dermatitis and neurodevelopment”, according to a Bandim media release. “The hepatitis B vaccine at birth has never been tested on a large scale for its overall health effects, so it is unknown whether the vaccine has non-specific health effects,” added Bandim. But Professor Gavin Yamey, director of the Center for Policy Impact in Global Health at Duke University, argues that “it is unethical to do a randomized controlled trial in which you withhold a proven, life-saving vaccine from newborn babies”. Meanwhile, Offit contends that “RFK Jr. has manipulated the study to support his unsupportable, science-resistant beliefs about harms caused by the hepatitis B vaccine”. He also notes that the study is single-blinded, which means that researchers will know which children received a birth dose of the vaccine. “This allows for investigator bias, where the investigator might find vague neurodevelopmental problems in the birth-dose group but not the six-week group,” he added. Share this: Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Combat the infodemic in health information and support health policy reporting from the global South. Our growing network of journalists in Africa, Asia, Geneva and New York connect the dots between regional realities and the big global debates, with evidence-based, open access news and analysis. To make a personal or organisational contribution click here.