Six-month-old Salam is screened for malnutrition at an UNRWA medical point in Gaza City.

“There is mass starvation in Gaza,” World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus asserted on Wednesday, aligning with a statement by 110 aid organisations released earlier that day.

“A large proportion of the population of Gaza is starving. I don’t know what you would call it other than mass starvation, and it’s man-made,” Tedros told a media briefing on Wednesday, referring to aid blockage since the controversial private organisation, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) assumed control over aid distribution.

“Rates of acute malnutrition exceed 10%, and over 20% of pregnant and breastfeeding women that have been screened are malnourished, often severely,” said Tedros.

“The hunger crisis is being accelerated by the collapse of aid pipelines and restrictions on access [with] 95% of households in Gaza facing severe water shortages.”

In their statement, the aid organisations including Medecins sans Frontieres (MSF), CARE, Christian Aid, Save the Children and Oxfam, urged governments to ensure that Israel ends “the siege of Gaza” and allows “the full flow of food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter items, and fuel through a principled, UN-led mechanism”.

For the past two months, aid has not been channelled through UN agencies but rather via the GHF, which is supported by the governments of Israel and the United States.

Since the GHF assumed control over aid distribution on 27 May, over 1,000 people have been killed by Israeli forces while trying to get food at the GHF distribution centres, according to the United Nations human rights office on Tuesday.

“Doctors report record rates of acute malnutrition, especially among children and older people,” according to the aid organisations. 

“Illnesses like acute watery diarrhoea are spreading, markets are empty, waste is piling up, and adults are collapsing on the streets from hunger and dehydration. Distributions in Gaza average just 28 trucks a day, far from enough for over two million people, many of whom have gone weeks without assistance.”

‘Tip of the iceberg’

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus addresses a media briefing on Wednesday.

“I don’t know why we’re even splitting hairs,” said Tedros, in reference to debate about whether Gazans were starving. “Not only were 1,026 people killed while trying to feed themselves or find food for their family, but thousands were also wounded.”

“We demand that there is full access [for humanitarian aid], and we demand that there is a ceasefire. We demand that there is a political solution to this problem, a lasting solution. And we also demand the release of the hostages, as we have always said,” Tedros concluded.

On Monday, the UN World Food Programme (WFP) said that a quarter of Gaza’s population faces famine-like conditions.

Dr Rik Peeperkorn, WHO representative for Palestine, said that malnutrition in Gaza had been negligible before Israel attacked Gaza in retaliation for Hamas’s attack on Israel on 7 October 2023. The malnutrition rate in children under the age of five was 0.6% then, while it did not exist in pregnant women or the elderly.

But this year, around 30,000 children are reported to be malnourished and 21 have died of hunger, said Peeperkorn, describing these statistics as “the tip of the iceberg”.

“In July alone, 5,100 children have been admitted to the malnutrition programme, including 880 children with severe malnutrition,” said Peeperkorn.

Several hospitals in the territory do not have the staff or supplies to function and have become malnutrition treatment centres, but two months ago, they lacked nutritional supplements for patients, he said.

Iman, six months old, is screened for malnutrition at an UNRWA medical point in Gaza city (July 2025)

Aid staff also face starvation.

Peeperkorn added that UN staff members were facing the same conditions of lack of water and food, and there was widespread “absolute lethargy” in Gaza as people lacked the energy to do basic tasks.

The aid organisations similarly reported that their staff are hungry and don’t have access to clean water.

 “Aid workers are now joining the same food lines, risking being shot just to feed their families. With supplies now totally depleted, humanitarian organisations are witnessing their own colleagues and partners waste away before their eyes,” they said.

“Doctors, nurses, journalists, humanitarians, among them UNRWA staff, are hungry… fainting due to hunger and exhaustion while performing their duties,” Juliette Touma, director of communications for the UN agency for Palestine refugees (UNRWA), said in a media statement on Tuesday.

Touma described “the so-called GHF distribution scheme” as  “a sadistic death-trap”, adding that “snipers open fire randomly on crowds as if they’re given a license to kill”.

She also told of massive food prices, recounting that a colleague paid almost $200 for a bag of lentils and some flour, after walking for hours to buy it.

The GHF claimed on Monday that, “Since launching operations on May 27, we’ve distributed nearly 85 million meals via more than 1.4 million boxes—directly to the people of Gaza”.

However, Israeli media outlet Haaretz said that GHF should have distributed several times this amount to ensure sufficient food.

“If roughly 2.1 million people live in the Gaza Strip today, it’s preferable for them to eat three meals a day, and GHF had been in operation for 56 days as of Monday, how many meals should it have distributed? A simple calculation produces the answer – 353 million,” reported the news outlet.

The GHF has also been criticised for distributing dry food when people are unable to cook, setting up too few food distribution centres and locating them in isolated areas, forcing thousands of people to walk long distances while exposed to IDF attacks and stampedes.

Over 90% of Gaza is under Israeli evacuation orders, and nowhere is safe for residents.

Earlier this week, the GHF offered to distribute the UN’s aid but the UN responded on Wednesday, saying that it would not work with any groups that put civilians’ lives in danger.

WHO staff detention and warehouse destruction

WHO warehouse in Deir al Balah lies in ruins after it it was attacked by Israeli military forces on Sunday and Monday.

Meanwhile, one WHO staff member remains in Israeli detention following an Israeli Defence Force attack on the WHO’s staff residence and its biggest warehouse in Deir al Balah.

Declining to name the staff member, Tedros said he had written to Israel’s Foreign Minister to demand his release and would take this up “at the highest level” if he remained in custody.

The IDF attack on the warehouse caused severe damage, destroying “a substantial amount of medical supplies in all areas: trauma, antibiotics and anaesthesia”, said Peeperkorn.

However, while this was a setback for the global organisation, it had identified other potential premises and would continue to support health facilities in Gaza, he added.

“We demand that there is full access, and we demand that there is a ceasefire. We demand that there is a political solution to this problem, a lasting solution. And we also demand the release of the hostages,” said Tedros.

Tougher EU stance against Israel?

The European Union (EU) seems to be toughening its stance against Israel in the face of the growing outcry over the starvation of the population.

On Tuesday, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas posted on X that “all options remain on the table if Israel doesn’t deliver on its pledges” to increase the number of aid trucks, crossing points and routes to distribution points.

“The killing of civilians seeking aid in Gaza is indefensible. I spoke again with [Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Saar] to recall our understanding on aid flow and made clear that IDF must stop killing people at distribution points,” said Kallas.

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also posted on X on Tuesday, declaring that “Civilians cannot be targets. Never. The images from Gaza are unbearable.”

Von der Leyen added: “The EU reiterates its call for the free, safe and swift flow of humanitarian aid. And for the full respect of international and humanitarian law. Civilians in Gaza have suffered too much, for too long. It must stop now. Israel must deliver on its pledges.”

Image Credits: UNRWA.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) headquarters in The Hague, The Netherlands

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled on Wednesday that states have a duty to prevent significant harm to the environment from climate change in a landmark advisory opinion.

The court also ruled that the states have a duty to cooperate internationally and called on them to set national climate targets that are of the “highest possible ambition.”

“The court concludes that the duty of states to prevent significant environmental harm applies in the context of climate change, and that this duty forms part of the most directly relevant applicable law concerning the duty to cooperate,” said ICJ President Judge Yuji Iwasawa, who read out the advisory.

The court addressed the issue of human rights and said they cannot be enjoyed without environmental protection. It has asked countries to bear in mind the Paris Agreement target to limit global warming to 1.5° C.

The ICJ’s ruling comes in response to a United Nations (UN) General Assembly resolution led by the small island nation of Vanuatu in the Pacific Ocean, which sought ICJ’s advisory opinion on the obligations of states on climate change, and the legal consequences of these.

This is the first opinion on climate change by the ICJ, and it is seen as a landmark in international law as all UN members are automatic signatories of the ICJ.

The ICJ, UN’s principal judicial organ of the UN, has a twofold role: to settle disputes between states and to give advisory opinions on legal questions. 

Climate crisis is a health crisis

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus speaking at the ICJ in December 2024.

While the ICJ did not explicitly refer to health, Iwasawa made it clear that countries have to ensure that their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) or the climate targets they set for themselves are ambitious.

“This means that each party has to do its utmost to ensure that the NDCs it puts forward represent its highest possible ambition,” Iwasawa said. While few countries have included health targets in their NDCs, there is an increasing global push to do so.

The ICJ took the testimonials of a range of stakeholders into account in the run-up to the verdict. In 2024, World Health Organization’s Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus spoke at the ICJ giving his testimonial on how the climate crisis is a health crisis.

In his testimonial, Tedros highlighted how climate change’s health impacts disproportionately affect small island nations like Tuvalu, also in the Pacific Ocean.

“Climate change and extreme weather are wreaking havoc on humans and their health, disrupting societies, economies and development,” Tedros said.

“Without immediate action, climate-related increases in disease prevalence, destruction of health infrastructure and growing societal burdens could overwhelm already overburdened health systems around the world,” he added.

ICJ opens the door for reparations

ICJ President Judge Yuji Iwasawa, Japan, delivering the advisory opinion

Iwasawa, while acknowledging that the effect of climate change is “severe and far-reaching,” noted that the ICJ was not asked to rule specifically on the issue of compensation or climate damages.

“The court considers that it has been requested to address legal consequences in a general manner, and that it is not called upon to identify the legal responsibility of any particular state or group of states,” he said.

He added that any such request must be looked at on a case by case basis. “Concerning the duty to make reparation, the appropriate nature and quantum of reparations cannot be assessed in the abstract, and depends on the circumstances of a particular case,” he said.

Reparations could take the form of ecological restoration or reconstruction of damaged infrastructure, the ICJ suggested.

Climate-related drought in the Horn of Africa has impacted approximately 4.5 million Somalis, and around 700,000 individuals have been forced to leave their homes.

“From deadly heat and toxic air to disease and displacement, the Court’s message is clear – human health is not collateral damage,” said Dr Jeni Miller, executive director at the Global Climate and Health Alliance.

“Health workers and advocates now have powerful legal backing to demand bold, science-based climate action rooted in justice, including a just transition away from fossil fuels, for health and the duty to protect life across all ages and borders,” she added.

Harjeet Singh, climate activist and founding director of Satat Sampada Climate Foundation, described the ruling as offering the potential for “a historic level of protection” for communities on the frontlines of climate change.

“It means the suffering, the loss of homes and livelihoods, and the terrifying storms and rising seas that have become our reality can now be met with demands for justice, restitution, and repair. The message is clear: the polluters must pay,” said Singh.

The ICJ advisory comes at a time when the US government is planning to repeal the scientific finding that established greenhouse gases endanger human life by pushing up global temperatures. This finding, established in 2009, gives governments the ability to push for climate action.

However, the Trump administration is on its way to repeal the finding, which now means the US will be at odds with ICJ’s latest advisory.

“Cooperation between states is the very foundation of meaningful international efforts with respect to climate change,” Iwasawa said.

Image Credits: ICJ, Photo by ICJ/CIJ | Frank van Beek, UN Photo/ICJ-CIJ/Frank van Beek. Courtesy of the ICJ., UN-Water/Twitter .

Billionaire entrepreneur and philanthropist Michael Bloomberg.

United States (US) Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr should promote public confidence in vaccines or be fired, according to Mike Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York, who has been the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Global Ambassador for Noncommunicable Diseases (NCDs) and Injuries since 2018. 

“Kennedy, who has no training in medicine or health, has long been the nation’s foremost peddler of junk science and the crackpot conspiracy theories that flow from it,” wrote Bloomberg in a hard-hitting opinion piece published in Bloomberg News on Tuesday.

“The greatest danger in elevating him to HHS secretary was always that he would use his position to undermine public confidence in vaccines, which would lead to needless suffering and even death. And so it has come to pass,” said Bloomberg, in one of the hardest-hitting critiques of Kennedy’s six-month term from a global health leader.

“Before this year, no one in the US had died from measles in a decade. This year, three people have died, two of them children. Yet Kennedy downplayed the outbreak, saying it was ‘not unusual’, “ Bloomberg said, blasting Kennedy’s failure to use his position to urge parents to vaccinate their children against measles.

“Some 1,300 cases of measles have now been reported this year, with children accounting for two-thirds of them. More than 160 people have been hospitalized — and survival does not guarantee a full recovery. Measles can lead to pneumonia and worse, including brain swelling and permanent disability.”

The latest report from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) records  1,319 measles cases in 40 states, with 92% of these in people who are either unvaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown. Children under the age of five make up the biggest group of people hospitalised as a result of measles.

US measles cases from January 2023 to 15 July 2025

Bloomberg said that other infectious diseases could also make a comeback under Kennedy, who has fired scientists, cut research and “fired all 17 members of the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel, which recommends the vaccines Americans should get.”

New advisory council members appointed by Kennedy include  “a variety of people without significant expertise in immunology, including those in the anti-vaccine movement — which promises to make the unfolding disaster even worse”.

Bloomberg, who initially ran for mayor of New York City as a Republican in 2001, reserved particular criticism for the Republican Senators, including medical doctor Bill Cassidy, who confirmed Kennedy as HHS Secretary.

Republican Senators need to ‘constrain Kennedy’s deadly actions’

Cassidy’s own question during Kennedy’s confirmation hearing provides the clear summary of the current situation, added Bloomberg.

Cassidy asked: “Does a 70-year-old man who has spent decades criticizing vaccines, and who’s financially vested in finding fault with vaccines — can he change his attitudes and approach now that he’ll have the most important position influencing vaccine policy in the United States?”

“The answer was always obvious,” said Bloomberg. “Kennedy never gave any indication that he would be changing his stripes, but Cassidy and his colleagues deceived themselves into thinking otherwise — or, worse, they knew better and simply buckled to political pressure, placing their own political careers above the lives of their constituents.”

“Senate Republicans have made this mess, and they need to clean it up,” said Bloomberg. “They have a constitutional responsibility to conduct oversight of Kennedy, and they have a moral responsibility to do everything possible to constrain Kennedy’s deadly actions — or force him out.

“That should include demanding that the White House pressure Kennedy to start promoting faith in vaccines, including by appointing more qualified people to the vaccine panel — or fire him.”

He concluded that “making America healthy again starts with bringing Kennedy to heel — or sending him packing”.

“Until Senate Republicans summon the courage to do that, more Americans will get severely sick and die — and Republicans will suffer the backlash at the polls.”

Bloomberg has poured millions of dollars of his considerable fortune into funding philanthropic efforts to combat tobacco use, eradicate polio, and address obesity, road safety, maternal health, and drowning

The Aedes mosquito, which transmits chikungunya virus.

A large outbreak of the mosquito-borne virus, chikungunya, is spreading rapidly from three Indian Ocean islands to Africa, while parts of South East Asia are also experiencing outbreaks, warned the World Health Organization (WHO) on Tuesday.

Around two-thirds of the population of the French island of Réunion has been infected with chikungunya over the past year, with other large outbreaks on the islands of Mayotte and Mauritius, Dr Diana Rojas Alvarez, WHO lead on arboviruses, told a Geneva media briefing on Tuesday.

She warned that a large global outbreak 20 years ago affecting about half a million people also started in the Indian Ocean islands, and urged health authorities to be on alert.

“Just like 20 years ago, the virus is now spreading further to other countries such as Madagascar, Somalia and Kenya, and there has been an epidemic transmission also occurring in South East Asia – in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and more,” she added.

Since the beginning of the year, Reunion has confirmed 54,410 cases of chikungunya, with 2,860 visits to the emergency room, 578 hospitalisations and 28 deaths, according to a report issued by the Pacific Community (SPC) on Tuesday.

Recent cases have been reported in France and Italy in people with no history of travel to the islands, and diagnosis in Europe may be slow, as doctors have little experience with the tropical disease.

Dr Diana Rojas Alvarez, WHO lead on arboviruses

The virus is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, and people infected with the virus can also transmit it back to mosquitoes that bite them, which enables the virus to spread rapidly.

The virus was first detected in the Americas (St Martin island) in 2013, and within a year, had affected over a million people in the region.

“The symptoms of Chikungunya are mostly acute, with very high fever, severe joint pain, muscle pain, skin rash and severe fatigue,” said Alvarez.

“The joint pain usually lasts for a few days, but up to 40% of the people who are infected with chikungunya can develop long-term disabilities that can last for a few months or even years,” she warned.

Since first being identified in Tanzania in the 1950s, chikungunya has been detected in 119 countries, and about 5.6 billion people live in areas at risk for the virus, said Alvarez.

 

Chikungunya causes rashes and acute joint pain.

Urgent action to prevent spread

““It is still not too late to prevent further transmission and the spread of the virus,” said Alvarez.  “We are calling for urgent action to prevent history from repeating itself. There is no particular treatment for chikungunya, so people need to avoid mosquito bites.”

Key preventive measures include the use of insect repellent, wearing long-sleeved clothing and trousers, installing screens on windows and doors and removing standing water from containers like buckets, tyres and flower pots that are mosquito breeding grounds, she explained.

Two chikungunya vaccines have received regulatory approvals in several countries, but have not yet been recommended for global use as there is not enough information about their efficacy yet.

However, the WHO and external expert advisors are reviewing vaccine trial and post-marketing data in the context of global chikungunya epidemiology to inform possible recommendations for use.

The WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on immunisations will meet in the next few weeks to advise the global body on the vaccines, said Alvarez.

“WHO is currently supporting member states by deploying and strengthening laboratory diagnosis, risk communication and community engagement, training clinical workers and strengthening surveillance and mosquito control,” said Alvarez.

Image Credits: PAHO.

The Working Group on amending the IHR during a meeting last December.

The United States’ decision last Friday to reject amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) – aimed at improving the global response to disease outbreaks – is based on “inaccuracies”, according to the Director General of the World Health Organisation (WHO).

“We regret the US decision to reject the amendments adopted by consensus by the World Health Assembly in 2024 – including by the US, as the US played an active role in developing and negotiating those amendments together with other countries,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Member states “have the right to decide whether or not to adopt and, subsequently, implement amendments to the IHR”, added Tedros.

US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed in a statement that the amendments “significantly expand” the WHO’s “authority over international public health responses” and will “have undue influence on our domestic health responses”.

This criticism of the IHR Amendments is part of the narrative of Project2025, the Trump administration’s governing blueprint published by conservative think-tank the Heritage Foundation before the 2024 US elections.

Learnings from COVID-19

In response, Tedros said he wished to “correct inaccuracies stated by Secretary Kennedy and Secretary Rubio”.

Tedros noted that the 2024 amendments “were proposed, negotiated and adopted by member states, based on the learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic” and “are not about empowering WHO, but about improving cooperation among member states in the next pandemic.

In addition, said Tedros, the “amendments are clear about member states’ sovereignty” and that the WHO “has never had the power to mandate lockdowns, travel restrictions or other such measures”, but “member states have the power to do so if they see the need”. 

The US officials also claimed that the amendments “create additional authorities for the WHO for shaping pandemic declarations, and promote WHO’s ability to facilitate “equitable access” of health commodities”, and “fail to adequately address the WHO’s susceptibility to the political influence and censorship – most notably from China – during outbreaks”.

However, Tedros said that “risk communication is an essential part of any emergency response, as populations need to be informed in a timely way”. 

“Using disease outbreaks for propaganda would be destructive and disastrous,” stressed Tedros, adding that the WHO “is impartial and works with all countries to improve people’s health”.

Georgetown University’s Professor Lawrence Gostin, who assisted the WHO to draft the IHR, said that Kennedy’s claim that amendments “ open the door to the kind of narrative management, propaganda, and censorship that we saw during the COVID pandemic” was untrue.

“The IHR facilitates rapid detection and response. It actually promotes accurate information and protects civil liberties. And it certainly does not affect US sovereignty. These are all falsehoods,” said Gostin, who is the O’Neill Chair in Global Health Law at Georgetown University.

What are the IHR amendments?

The IHR were amended after the SARS outbreak in 2005, but widespread criticism of the WHO’s slow response to COVID-19 prompted member states to resolve to amend the regulations again to enable speedier and more sophisticated responses to health emergencies.

The new amendments to the IHR include the introduction of the definition of a “pandemic emergency” to trigger more effective international collaboration in response to events that are at risk of becoming a pandemic. 

There is also a new commitment to solidarity and equity, based on strengthening all countries’ access to medical products and financing. This includes establishing a “Coordinating Financial Mechanism” to help raise funds to enhance developing countries’ pandemic emergency prevention, preparedness and response-related capacities.

While the IHR proposes the establishment of a “States Parties Committee” to facilitate the implementation of the amended regulations, this is “non-punitive” and based on supporting and facilitating inter-country cooperation rather than dictating how countries should respond to disease outbreaks.

The US was a vice-chair of the Working Group on Amendments to the IHR (WGIHR) that negotiated to amendments to the IHR under the Biden administration, and the US delegation stressed that they would not accept an agreement that undermined US sovereignty.

“The experience of epidemics and pandemics, from Ebola and Zika to COVID-19 and mpox, showed us where we needed better public health surveillance, response and preparedness mechanisms around the world,” said Dr Ashley Bloomfield of New Zealand, WGIHR co-chair , at the conclusion of the negotiations on the amendments.

His co-chair, Dr Abdullah Assiri of Saudi Arabia, added that the amendments  “strengthen mechanisms for our collective protections and preparedness against outbreak and pandemic emergency risks”.

Image Credits: WHO.

Transitioning to cleaner cookstoves and fuels

Achieving universal access to clean cooking across Africa will require $37 billion in cumulative investment to 2040, or roughly $2 billion per year, according to the roadmap laid out by the International Energy Agency (IEA) in its latest report.

The roadmap envisions that 60% of the energy for the newly connected households will come from liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and the rest from electricity, bioethanol, biogas and advanced biomass cookstoves. Urban areas would be able to reach near-complete access by 2035 while rural access would expand steadily through the 2030s, should countries receive necessary support from the international community.

“This new IEA report provides a clear, data-driven roadmap for every household across Africa to gain access,” said Fatih Birol, executive director, IEA.

“The problem is solvable with existing technologies, and it would cost less than 0.1% of total energy investment globally. But delivering on this will require stronger focus and coordinated action from governments, industry and development partners,” he added.

The IEA report also tracks the outcomes of the summit on clean cooking in Africa – held in May 2024 in Paris which mobilised over $2.2 billion in public and private sector commitments. More than $470 million of those commitments have already been disbursed, according to the report.

Meanwhile, in the broader energy picture, a new United Nations (UN) report found that there is great potential for expansion of renewable technology across the world but countries still need to move faster. “The clean energy future is no longer a promise. It’s a fact. No government, no industry, no special interest can stop it,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres said during the report’s release.

Guterres expressed confidence that transitioning to clean energy is only a matter of time, given that it makes more financial sense. Clean energy also tends to be safer and easier to access even in remote areas, he added.

Areas that need investment

Population without access to clean cooking by region, 2010-2023.

While access to clean cooking is improving in most parts of the world, including Asia and Latin America, it is the reverse in sub-Saharan Africa leading to more focus on the region within Africa.

At the moment, around four in five households in sub-Saharan Africa still cook with polluting fuels like wood, charcoal or dung, often over open fires or basic stoves. The population without access to clean cooking in this region stands at one billion.

While the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aimed for universal access to clean energy by 2030, the world is currently off track to meet that goal.

Transitioning to clean cooking is helpful not just to meet that goal but it is also seen as a ‘low-hanging fruit’ when it comes to climate action is it also reduces carbon emissions.

Clean cooking access rates and annual improvements in sub-Saharan Africa by region.

IEA’s roadmap estimates that 80 million people can gain access to clean cooking fuel every year until 2040, which is sevenfold increase compared to today’s pace. To do this will require $37 billion in cumulative investment to 2040.

This investment would go towards upfront spending on household equipment such as stoves, fuel cylinders and canisters, as well building the enabling infrastructure like fuel distribution networks, storage terminals and electricity grid upgrades. This will also create an estimated 460,000 jobs by 2040, according to the report that made an investment case for clean cooking.

LPG will be 60% of the new connections, supported by other sources like solar and electricity. While electric cooking is the rage in developing countries and very efficient, the unreliable or non-existent nature of electricity in parts of the developing world make it unviable as a solution that can be deployed at scale. Solar too has its limitations when it comes to the changing weather that might reduce sunshine as well as the limited battery capacity to store the energy generated.

“Clean cooking is not a luxury. It’s an issue that touches every family, every day,” said Tanzania’s President Samia Suluhu Hassan. “The African Union (AU) Dar es Salaam Declaration on clean cooking, signed earlier this year by 30 heads of state from across Africa and now adopted by the AU Assembly in February this year, is a clear signal of our commitment to making energy access and clean cooking a national and continental priority,” she added.

Tracking progress of financial commitments

Hassan emphasized that countries will need support from partners to improve access to clean cooking. IEA’s report says that some of the support is on the way.

IEA has documented that $470 million of the pledged $2.2 billion in commitments in 2024 have already been disbursed. The pledged money is coming from both governments as well as the private sector. Nearly 18% of this money came from governments and 82% by private sector actors. Ireland and the United States are the two governments that have disbursed the entire sum they committed to.

Following the summit, 10 out of the 12 African governments that were a part of the clean cooking in Africa summit have enacted or implemented new clean cooking policies. Currently over 70% of people without access to clean cooking live in countries that strengthened their policy frameworks since 2024, according to IEA’s report.

Tanzania and Kenya demonstrated the largest increase in policy coverage since 2024. Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe are the sub-Saharan Africa countries that have the widest coverage of key clean cooking policies, the report said.

The policies included government programmes that supported clean cooking fuels like LPG, tax incentives for switching to clean cooking and cooking stove distribution programmes, amongst others.

For nearly two thirds of sub-Saharan Africans affordability remains a major constraint as they would need to spend more than 10% of their income to adopt clean cooking solutions. To make clean cooking more affordable for the underserved population would require special attention by governments and policy focus.

Boost to women’s health, quality of life

An Indian woman cooks with an LPG stove that she received as a participant in the HAPIN study that looks at the impact of switching to LPG on health.

Indoor air pollution was linked to 3.2 million annual deaths in 2020, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Most of those affected are women and children.

IEA’s report estimates that the number of pre-mature deaths for Africa is around 815,000, and that improving access to clean cooking will improve women’s lives tremendously. Women also spend up to four hours a day gathering fuel for cooking, including firewood. This time could have been otherwise spent in gainful economic activity or rest and leisure.

While clean cooking certainly saves times, at the moment the evidence on the health gains it would lead to is missing. Results of recent household trials where the family switched from biomass to LPG did not show significant health gains.

Where Africa stands at the moment

Investments in sub-Saharan Africa’s cooking infrastructure and equipment, 2019-2023.

IEA report finds that while access to clean cooking by 2040 is achievable across Africa, it will require efforts across governments, industry, civil society, and the international community.

Investments have continued to rise since 2013, but more is needed, especially in underserved areas.

“With strong political commitment, targeted finance and regional cooperation, we can make universal access to clean cooking a reality for every African household. The IEA’s leadership in convening partners and tracking progress has been instrumental in elevating clean cooking on the global agenda and turning pledges into real action on the ground,” said Lerato Mataboge, African Union Commissioner for Infrastructure and Energy.

Image Credits: Climate and Clean Air Coalition , IEA, India HAPIN team.

Canada’s struggle with substance use is more than a health issue—it’s a matter of language, policy, and public trust, said Dr. Kwame McKenzie in the latest episode of the Global Health Matters podcast with Dr. Garry Aslanyan.

McKenzie, CEO of the Wellesley Institute and Director of Health Equity at Canada’s Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, stressed that terms like “substance abuse” are outdated.

“People tend to talk about substance use, not abuse,” he explained. “It’s a useful term because it focusses on health rather than illness.”

Canada’s biggest problem isn’t illegal drugs—it’s alcohol.

“Heavy drinking is 16% of the population,” said McKenzie.

Illegal drugs? Just 3%. Yet the opioid crisis has been devastating.

“Before COVID, Canada averaged 11 daily deaths from opioid toxicity. By 2022, that number increased to more than 21,” he said, attributing the spike to a more toxic, unpredictable supply chain disrupted by the pandemic.

While some Canadian provinces moved toward decriminalisation, political headwinds have pushed back. “We have seen a return to non evidence-based political arguments, which are again trying to say that substance use is a moral failing,” he warned.

McKenzie contrasted Canada’s path with Portugal, where health—not criminality—is the focus.

“There’s lots of evidence to show that [Portugal’s model] increased the number of people going into rehabilitation,” he said. “Has it decreased the number of people taking substances? No. But that wasn’t the intention.”

The main takeaway?

“Criminalising substance use has not been very successful,” McKenzie said. “If you want to create cartels … and an ingrained substance use problem that just gets worse, then have a war against [drugs]. It will not work.”

McKenzie’s final advice for policymakers: “There are no silver bullets. We have to make choices, and we might have to make sacrifices in order to get where we want to go.”

Listen to more episodes of the Global Health Matters podcast on Health Policy Watch.

Image Credits: Global Health Matters Podcast.

A WHO health worker administers an oral cholera vaccine to residents in Sudan during a mass camapign in July 2025.

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has seen a 30% increase in cholera cases over the past week, largely as a result of flooding and conflict, according to the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC).

Deaths have almost doubled, with 124 people dying in the past week in comparison to 65 deaths the previous week.

Vaccination against cholera is at a low 7%, in part due to the inaccessibility of areas and the lack of vaccines, according to Professor Yap Boum, Africa CDC’s deputy head of mpox.

Meanwhile, cholera cases in Sudan have dropped by 43% and by 12% in South Sudan, which has also managed to vaccinate 72% of people at risk.

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Eastern Mediterranean Region reports that the decline in cholera cases in Sudan’s Khartoum State follows “a 10-day vaccination campaign that reached more than 2.24 million people – achieving 96% coverage – in 12 hot spots in 5 at-risk localities”.

“Together with response measures such as case management, surveillance, risk communication and community engagement, and improvements in access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene, the campaign contributed to a sustained fall in the number of new cases,” according to WHO EMRO in a media release this week.

The year-long cholera outbreak in Sudan has infected 87,219 people and caused 2260 deaths, according to WHO EMRO.

“The outbreak is fueled by displacement, lack of access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene caused by the breakdown of water supply systems, and limited amounts of medical supplies for the management of cases,” said WHO EMRO, adding that drone attacks on power and water system infrastructure had “severely compromised access to safe water and adequate health care”.

But cholera “will not be solved from a medical perspective, but only through a multi-sectoral approach” that includes access to clean water, Boum stressed.

He added that the continent had already experienced 44 “high-risk” health events this year (in comparison to 72 for the entire 2024).

“We have to get used to the challenge of answering to diverse outbreaks at the same time, but also at a time where the resources are more and more limited, reminding us of the need to be efficient,” said Boum.

Mpox cases fall

Mpox cases continue to fall across Africa, with almost three-quarters of cases in the DRC, Uganda and Sierra Leone.

However, Boum said that several people infected with mpox died as a result of being infected with other diseases at the same time,  most notably measles.

“This has re-emphasised the decision that we’ve taken to focus on integration [of disease control and prevention],” he added.

Ethiopia has used its polio vaccination campaign to also screen for mpox, reaching more than 22 million people, which “is a very good example of leadership and integration”, said Boum.

Mpox testing coverage has also improved, reaching 55,5% of suspected cases in the past week in comparison to 39% in previous weeks.

Boum also reported that, in the past week, the African Union has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to “strengthen health systems and expand healthcare access across Africa”. 

This was formalised during the African Union Mid-Year Coordination Meeting (AUMYCM) in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea. The agreement aims to enhance public health security, improve emergency response, and foster a healthier future for Africa

Image Credits: WHO EMRO.

Climate change also added 41 days of dangerous heat in 2024, according to a report jointly produced by the team at World Weather Attribution (WWA) and Climate Central.

After 2024 became the warmest year on record, with temperatures rising 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels for the first time ever, humanity is “moving into the unknown,” said Andy Haines, professor of environmental change and public health at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

Andy Haines
Andy Haines, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

“We are now above the Paris Agreement’s preferred target of 1.5° Celsius [above pre-industrial levels), and six of the nine planetary boundaries have already been transgressed,” Haines said, speaking in late May at an event on the margins of the World Health Assembly.

“These environmental thresholds interact in ways we don’t fully understand, meaning we will encounter surprises, nonlinear changes, and tipping points with irreversible consequences in human lifetimes.”

The nine planetary boundaries are a scientific guideline that outlines the safe limits of Earth’s natural systems. They mark the thresholds that humanity shouldn’t cross if it wants to avoid lasting harm to the environment and serious risks to human well-being.

Crossing these boundaries—such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and others—could lead to sudden or irreversible shifts in the Earth’s systems.

 A framework linking planetary boundaries and human health outcomes.
A framework linking planetary boundaries and human health outcomes.

Just six weeks on, his words seem all the more prescient, given the unprecedented flooding in Texas and unbearable heat waves seen since in Europe. Meanwhile, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has forecast that last year’s record heat levels will continue for the next five years, exceeding the 1.5°C threshold yet again at least once.

Rare moment of constructive dialogue amidst geopolitical tensions

Wildfire in western United States. Rich as well as poor countries across the world are seeing Increased flooding, heatwaves and wildfires as a result of climate change.

Haines’ stark warning opened a unique gathering of about 100 climate and health experts from around the world. The session on “Climate Change and Health, Adaptation and Resilience in a Changing World, at the Geneva Health Forum’s 2025 conference, offered a rare moment of constructive dialogue amid rising geopolitical tensions.

As Haines and other participants underlined, climate change is having a cumulative series of impacts going far beyond heatwaves, and it must be treated as an environmental or economic crisis, as well as a defining human health emergency.

Haines also cautioned that efforts to adapt to climate change – an emphasis in many low- and middle-income countries that lack resources to transition to clean and renewable energy sources – will not be enough to avert disaster.

“We can’t adapt our way out of this crisis. We have to do both—adaptation and mitigation—in an integrated way,” Haines stressed.

He highlighted that decisions made now will shape the health futures of generations. “Children born in 2020 will experience drastically different lifetimes than those born in the 1960s,” Haines said. “About 90% of them are expected to live their lives exposed to extreme climate conditions, especially heat.”

Planetary boundaries

In the past, climate change was traditionally seen through the lens of rising heat and more extreme weather, including storms. But today, there is a growing understanding of how warmer temperatures are stressing other ecosystems essential to human life on this earth. And at the same time, as more of those planetary boundaries are breached, these also exacerbate the effects of climate change.

Planetary boundaries
Planetary boundaries

The nine planetary boundaries are climate change, ocean acidification, stratospheric ozone depletion, biogeochemical flows in the nitrogen cycle, excess global freshwater use, land system change, the erosion of biosphere integrity, chemical pollution, and atmospheric aerosol loading. They were first identified in 2009 by a team of 28 international researchers.

“Planetary health is bigger than climate change,” Haines stressed. “So, we’re actually facing multiple planetary level threats. Six of the nine planetary boundaries have been exceeded, have been transgressed, and these planetary boundaries interact in all sorts of complex ways we don’t fully understand.”

Adaptation vs mitigation

Hospital in Rwanda. More climate resilient roofs, ventilation and energy systems can both adapt to, and mitigate, climate change.

Climate adaptation involves taking action to prepare for and adjust to the current and future impacts of climate change. In contrast, climate mitigation refers to efforts to reduce or prevent greenhouse gas emissions from human activities, thereby slowing or reversing the effects of global warming.

Countries most vulnerable to climate impacts prioritize adaptation, while major emitters focus on mitigation.

“It’s often true to say that we tend to put adaptation and mitigation in separate boxes. I want to argue that we need to do both in an integrated way,” Haines said.

“We shouldn’t pose one against the other. We shouldn’t say, ‘Well, we’re going to adapt, so we don’t need to mitigate. We’re going to mitigate so we don’t need to adapt.’ That’s not true. We can’t adapt our way out of this crisis. We have to do both,” he continued.

Haines noted that while many adaptation strategies may seem intuitive, they must still be evaluated for long-term impact. For example, installing air conditioning to deal with heat might appear helpful, but it releases hot air outdoors and increases fossil fuel consumption.

“So, we’ll then have to move towards passive ventilation – green roofs, green space in cities,” Haines said.

“But even when we’re thinking about cities and nature, we need to be careful which trees we choose. So if you choose some very allergenic trees, you make health problems worse,” Haines said.

He added that adaptation must not be oversimplified: “We need to have better science, better understanding, and a more nuanced approach to adaptation.

“Implementation science is not given the respect it deserves in academia,” Haines said. “But understanding what happens when we apply interventions at scale is critical. Do we get the co-benefits we expect? Do we inadvertently harm people?”

Other challenges of adaptation – nutrition and health services

Jessica Kronsdadt, Planetary Health Alliance.

Similar questions arise when considering how to adapt to shifting food systems, said Jessica Kronstadt of the Planetary Health Alliance at Johns Hopkins University.

“How do food systems change because of different concentrations of CO₂ in the environment, because of changing precipitation?” she asked.

“What are the implications of the loss of pollinators and other biodiversity loss?” Kronstadt continued. “What are the implications of pollution, and how does this affect aquaculture? So again, as we think about adaptation, what are all the environmental changes we’re adapting to, and what are all the health impacts?”

Good nutrition is central to climate resilience as well as health equity, added Sandro Demaio, Director of the WHO’s Western Pacific Regional Office, who described how countries in his region are actively working to ensure that healthy food remains accessible to all in a warming world.

A traditional vegetable market in the Maldives. Traditional markets provide access to healthy, fresh foods that play critical roles in feeding individuals and households globally.

Across Asia “there is such an incredibly rich food culture that we should be proud of, and we should hold on to, including the indigenous food knowledge across the region,” Demaio said.

At the same time, in isolated Pacific Island states, climate change poses severe risks to food systems and other vital health infrastructure, he noted.

In many Pacific Island countries, for instance, around 60% of health services are located within half a kilometer of the ocean, and are increasingly threatened by rising sea levels and extreme weather.

Better assessment of adaptation measures

For Yonhee Kim of the Department of Global Environmental Health at the University of Tokyo, the key concern is more effective assessment of adaptation measures.

“There are many ideas, and there are many interventions,” she said. However, leaders must evaluate which strategies best suit particular settings and contexts.

“We need to think about the real-world setting,” Kim emphasized.

She also pointed out that while there is growing evidence about the physical impacts of adaptation strategies, there is still insufficient research on their effects on mental health. For instance, one typical response to urban heat is establishing cooling centers, but psychological barriers may prevent some individuals from utilizing them.

“We need to think of what we might overlook, and we may need to consider the kinds of unique characteristics that individuals with mental health conditions may have,” Kim said.

Cultural values and human behavior are primary drivers of environmental change and will ultimately shape how countries approach adaptation and mitigation, she pointed out.

“What are the values that we need to both try to prevent some of the changes, to begin with, but also make sure we’re adapting?” Kronstadt asked.

On the road to COP30 in Brazil

Vanke Dean and former WHO Director General Margaret Chan

The WHA session took place ahead of a long lineup of summer and autumn climate events climaxing in the United Nations Climate Conference in Belém, Brazil in November (COP 30).

“We need to go further, faster, and fairer,” said UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Simon Stiell at the close of the intersessional Climate meetings in Bonn on 27 June, where delegations from around the world made only incremental progress on a range of thorny issues, from the weak-kneed national climate commitments to a new goal on climate finance.

That followed an event earlier in June, where the WHO’s European Regional office launched the Pan-European Commission on Climate and Health (PECCH) – to tackle the growing threat climate change poses to public health.

This week, a Global Climate and Health Summit hosted by the Physiological Society and supported by Wellcome is taking place in London.

Anh Vu, of the UK’s National Centre for Social Research, talks about research on the increased impacts of heat on outdoor workers in Viet Nam, at the Global Climate and Health Summit this week in London.

That is to be followed by the more policy-focused Global Conference on Climate and Health, 29-31 July, in Brasília, Brazil, hosted by the Government of Brazil, the World Health Organization, and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO).

The Brasília conference hopes to come up with a set of concrete inputs to the draft Belém Health Action Plan as well as a strategy for promoting health as a “core pillar of climate action” at COP30, taking place in Belém, 10-21 November.

And on 1-2 November, just ahead of COP30, Beijing’s Vanke School of Public Health will commemorate the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement at its World Health Forum, with the theme : Climate Change & Health: Responsibility, Governance, and a Shared Future for Mankind,” notes Vanke Dean, Margaret Chan, former WHO Director General (2006-2017), who moderated the WHA side event in May.

“The scientists’ discussion about ‘planetary limits’ is real,” Chan said, who, in her remarks  stressed the urgency of equipping younger generations to tackle climate-related health threats, and noted a Vanke School initiative to develop a Chinese edition of a textbook on planetary health limits.

Speaking later with Health Policy Watch, Chan recalled how she was “initiated very early on about climate and health issues,” when she first first joined WHO in 2003 as the Director of the Department of Public Health and Environment, which was synthesizing at the time, the early research on the issue. In 2008, as a new WHO Director General, Chan presided over the passage of the first World Health Assembly Resolution on Climate Change and Health.

Europe and Asia are both heat hotspots

In 2024 Europe saw climate impacts ranging from heatwaves to wildfires.

While nearly half of humanity already lives in areas highly susceptible to climate change weather extremes, a third of the world’s heat-related deaths occur in the European Region – with an estimated 100,000 heat-related deaths in 35 European countries in 2022-23 alone, according to WHO.

Asia, meanwhile, is warming at twice the rate as the rest of the world, according to another recent WMO report; glaciers that feed vital freshwater reserves used during the dry season also are melting faster.

In 2023, the Lancet Countdown report found that global deaths from heat exposure have surged by 65% since the early 2000s, from around 188,000 annually to 310,000 in the 2020s.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s medium emissions scenario, which predicts 2.4°C warming by 2100, projects that between a million and 1.7 million additional temperature-related deaths will occur annually by the end of the century.

The health argument: A longstanding refrain still ignored

Maria Neira, WHO’s Climate, Environment and Health Department.

“Health can be the most powerful argument for climate action. Health is the argument for climate change,” said Dr Maria Neira, director of WHO’s Department of Climate, Environment and Health, at the May event.

Her remarks are a longstanding WHO refrain that come amid growing scientific consensus that climate change is “the greatest 21st-century health threat,” according to a recent analysis in the BMJ, which called for more focused local data and funding for climate and health priorities.

“Substantial and growing evidence shows its harmful effects on health through various pathways, including heat stress, drought, and shifting infectious disease patterns,” wrote the authors from Australia, Norway and Denmark, echoing remarks by Haines and others at the GHF conference.

Neira said that reducing climate pollutants would also reduce air pollution, which now causes as many as seven million premature deaths each year.

“Everybody should understand that they are not just negotiating with the percentage of emissions of greenhouse gases. They are negotiating with our lives because the decisions they are going to take will have an impact on how many cases of asthma, lung cancer, and cardiovascular diseases we are going to have.”

“What we are seeing are politicians, with the best intentions, treating climate change as if it were an economic or an environmental issue,” Neira added.

Cunrui Huang, Vanke School, talks about collaboration across sectors.

Cunrui Huang of the Vanke School of Public Health at Tsinghua University in China echoed Neira’s message, emphasizing the need to prioritize people and public health in climate action.

He said climate change multiplies health risks and stressed the importance of strengthening cross-sector partnerships, particularly between the environment, health, and energy sectors.

“We need to bring health to the center of climate discussions, and we need to break the silos of health, energy, environment,” Huang said. “We need to work together.”

Linking adaptation and mitigation seamlessly

Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa decked with solar panels to support clean energy supply in the health sector.

One area where such cross-sector partnerships can foster more seamless adaptation and mitigation strategies is in the health sector itself, said Neira.

She pointed to the Alliance for Transformative Action on Climate and Health (ATACH). The initiative focuses on two primary goals. The first involves decarbonising health systems, which account for around 5% of global emissions. The second involves bolstering health systems’ resilience and response to extreme weather and climate-related events through channels ranging from early warning systems to better health services coverage for climate-sensitive diseases.

ATACH already has membership from 94 member states, which have set goals for their health systems in line with local needs and capacities.

“As the health professionals, we can decarbonize our own health system, of course, keeping with the top quality of care,” Neira said. “We can also reduce the amount of plastics and the amount of procurements.”

Leveraging renewable energy is a key component of the initiative, she said, leading to more accessible and affordable electricity for clinics in remote and rural areas of Africa and Asia – while also putting them on a low-carbon trajectory.

At the same time, designing the physical infrastructure of clinics to better withstand heat and storms, can simultaneously make them more resilient and more energy-efficient.

“We are solarizing as many healthcare facilities around the world as possible,” said Neira.

‘Sponge’ cities to combat urban heat impacts

(On left): John S Ji of China’s Vanke School of Public Health.

Urban planning is yet another domain where the use of integrated adaptation and mitigation strategies can bolster the health and climate resilience of a city’s residents, Neira added.

More urban green spaces not only reduce climate impacts, but can improve mental health, ease traffic congestion, and encourage more active lifestyles, in turn reducing the burden of non-communicable diseases and their associated conditions.

John S Ji of China’s Vanke School of Public Health at Beijing’s Tsinghua University pointed to the tensions that have arisen in traditional forms of urbanization between climate, health and development goals.

For example, in many developing countries, including China, urbanization has been associated with longer life expectancy due to better access to health services.

“Is urbanization causing longer life expectancy?” Ji asked. “Maybe, but at the same time, it’s causing the urban heat island effect,” he explained, referring to the phenomenon where large expanses of urban asphalt heat up cities more than around their periphery.

“In downtown centers, the temperature can be up to 5° C higher as compared to rural areas. So the urban heat island is an issue.”

To address this, some communities have implemented a “sponge city” concept, which enables the coexistence of water, green spaces, and dense urban development.

Central Park, New York City: Green spaces can mitigate urban heat island impacts – although design features need to consider local factors like vector borne disease habitats.

“But how do we implement this effectively?” Ji asked. “How do we do it without vector-borne diseases, such as mosquitoes, and also allergies from certain choices of trees? These could be major issues going forward.”
China leads ‘climate health literacy’

Despite the growing impacts on daily life of heat and extreme weather, the general public remains poorly informed about the relationship between climate and health, said Jian Zhou of the Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy at Tsinghua University.

“I think it is the critical moment and essential for us to set up something that we label as the climate health literacy,” Zhou said.

China’s leadership in climate and health education

Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, China.

Under the guidance of Chan, who has continued to carry forward the climate message ever since leaving WHO in 2017, the Vanke School of Public Health, which is part of Tsinghua University, has launched a new climate and health literacy initiative.

The programme features two core courses on climate and health run by the Global University Alliance, which recruits students from around the world for a six-month program. After completing the courses, students return to their universities and local communities to share their knowledge with peers.

In 2024, the program reached students from more than 400 universities in 79 countries.

Vanke’s World Health Forum in November will meanwhile bring together international organizations as well as government officials, academic experts, and industry leaders from around the world, Chan told Health Policy Watch. “This forum, directly addresses the growing health risks posed by escalating climate crises, aiming to promote the deep integration of emission reduction targets and population health benefits. It will also contribute to the implementation of the Paris Agreement and advancing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

“Global climate governance has entered a critical stage of deepening global cooperation and collaboration,” Chan said, adding “Climate change has become the most pressing global challenge of the 21st century.”

Elaine Ruth Fletcher contributed reporting and editing to this story

Image Credits: WMO, Maayan Hoffman, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Daria Devyatkina/Flickr, Stockholm Resilience Centre, WHO/Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GHF, WHO/V. Gupta-Smith, E Fletcher, Health Policy Watch, European State of the Climate 2024 report, Health Care Without Harm , Sergio Calleja/Flickr , Vanke School of Public Health .

Protesters demonstrating against global funding cuts during the opening ceremony of IAS 2025, the 13th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Science, in Kigali.

KIGALI – Relief swept through delegates at the International AIDS Society (IAS) conference in Kigali, Rwanda, as news broke that the US Senate had moved to shield the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) from proposed budget cuts.

Late Tuesday, the US Senate  agreed to exempt the flagship HIV program from a planned $400 million reduction, which had been included in a $9.4 billion rescission package put forward by President Donald Trump.

The rescission package seeks to claw back federal funds from various programs, including approximately $900 million in global health allocations.

While the full package still awaits a final vote in both chambers of Congress, and amendments may yet emerge, the bipartisan removal of the PEPFAR cut marks a significant policy reversal. Under US budget law, Congress had 45 days to reappropriate the allocations, and that window closes on Friday (18 July).

IAS President-Elect Kenneth Ngure and Prof Linda-Gail Bekker

“This is the best news ever,” said Professor Linda-Gail Bekker, former IAS president and director of the Desmond Tutu HIV Centre in South Africa.

“I’ve said this before, and I’m going to say it again, PEPFAR is the most important and consequential contribution to public health, certainly in my lifetime, and probably ever. That it is not going away in its entirety is a victory for all who’ve advocated for it.”

Bekker also thanked “every single person who’s advocated for this, and every person who will ensure that we see it go through and that it does not end until we get to a point where we can safely transition to a sustainable plan”.

PEPFAR’s impact over the past 20 years.

Since the US global funding freeze from 20 January when Trump assumed the presidency, disruptions in service delivery have been reported across globally, and most severely in Africa, including interruptions in HIV testing, treatment distribution, and prevention programs.

These disruptions have placed millions of lives at risk, particularly in countries heavily dependent on US-supported HIV infrastructure.

Carolyn Amole, Clinton Health Access Initiative vice-president for HIV, hepatitis and TB, said that the ripple effects of PEPFAR’s funding disruptions had extended to commodities procurement, and essential systems, such as human resources, supply chains, and data infrastructure, undermining service delivery and overall program performance.

Modeling estimates suggest that, without intervention, up to 11 million new HIV infections and three million additional deaths could occur globally in the next five years.

Questions about PEPFAR’s future still remains

While the Senate’s move was met with applause, experts cautioned that broader risks remain.

Jirair Ratevosian, PEPFAR’s chief-of-staff under President Joe Biden, told an IAS press briefing that the US administration had yet to justify the rationale for these cuts, raising concerns about the politicization of budgetary decisions.

The Trump administration had claimed that PEPFAR funds were being spent in Russia, an assertion that was disproved as no allocations have been made to Russia since 2012. This clarification was instrumental in building bipartisan support for PEPFAR’s protection.

Still, the future of the program remains uncertain. With PEPFAR now under the US State Department, decisions on implementation will be shaped by the PEPFAR Scientific Advisory Board and other external advisors. Updated frameworks are expected to guide how and where services are delivered, though details remain limited.

“Unfortunately, it’s not over,” Ratevosian said. “We have to take today’s victory, celebrate, and then wake up tomorrow ready to keep fighting.”

“Global advocacy played a crucial role in persuading US lawmakers to protect this vital programme, reminding them that decisions about PEPFAR shape the health and futures of people around the world,” said IAS President Beatriz Grinsztejn.

But Grinsztejn warned that “uncertainty remains, with ongoing threats to global health funding. We must stay vigilant.”

People at Luyengo Clinic in Eswatini wait for services. PEPFAR funded 80% of the clinic’s cost, and US cuts threatened the HIV treatment of 3,000 people.

Ratevosian also viewed the crisis as a chance to rethink how countries prepare for shocks. “This wake-up call has forced us to build resilience and sustainability,” he said, urging governments to take ownership of their HIV responses and expand domestic funding mechanisms.

“We don’t know who will be in power next year. We can’t leave national health programs at the mercy of external political changes.”

He also called for greater transparency in transitions: “There must be a planned phase-out—not a chaotic drop-off. The uncertainty of this crisis was part of the harm.”

Despite the Senate’s decision, gaps remain, particularly in areas supported by National Insitutes of Health (NIH), Centers for Disease Control and Preventin (CDC), and other US agencies.

“The PEPFAR money will only cover certain things. There are still huge holes due to earlier account freezes. We must continue to push for full restoration, not just of PEPFAR, but of the broader global health apparatus.”

Bekker also called for change: “We can’t go back to how things were. We need to recalibrate based on what’s most effective now, country by country.”

IAS President-Elect Kenneth Ngure added that conversations on long-term sustainability must still continue:  “PEPFAR is a lifeline for communities across Africa. But we must also strengthen domestic investment and reduce dependence on donors.”

He warned that while PEPFAR may be protected for now, future rescission packages, delayed disbursements, or reprogrammed funds remain plausible threats. Advocacy, he stressed, must continue to be relentless and grounded in evidence. “We must showcase the science and the human impact—again and again.”

Image Credits: Jean Bizimana/ IAS, PEPFAR, UNAIDS.