African Nations Ask WHO for Increased Funding as Global Health Aid Hits Decade-Low 22/05/2025 Disha Shetty & Stefan Anderson WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus at the 78th session of the World Health Assembly. African countries at the World Health Assembly called for increased support to health systems across the continent following major cuts to all World Health Organization (WHO) regional office budgets amid a financial crisis triggered by the US withdrawal from the agency and falling global health spending. The African region suffered the largest total cut, losing over $150 million in funds for WHO operations across the continent. “It is imperative that the WHO provides focused support to strengthen the capacities and the capabilities in countries, including through enhanced local production technology transfer and equitable distribution mechanisms,” the Ethiopian delegation said on Wednesday in a joint statement on behalf of the 47 countries in the WHO Africa region. The statement added that African nations need support in “strengthening integrated clinical services and everyday systems to handle emergencies, and the readiness in countries to deliver a timely and effective response.” Middle-income countries also made cases to be prioritised alongside low-income ones. “Health resilience can only be achieved with long-term, predictable and equitable financing. We are calling for the pandemic fund to be bolstered with increased accessibility for middle-income countries,” a delegate from Morocco said. Evolution of country-level programme budgets, by region. All six WHO regions face a steep decline in annual funding when the next budget takes effect in 2026. The plea from low- and middle-income nations follows member states’ approval on Tuesday of a new WHO budget for the 2026-27 period that slashed $1.1 billion from its previous target while raising membership fees by 20%. All WHO regions suffered the same flat 14% cut amid the financial squeeze, except Geneva headquarters, which faces a drop of nearly a quarter year-on-year. Even with an extra $170 million raised from member states on Tuesday, the agency faces a $1.5 billion funding gap on top of the $1.1 billion already slashed from projections for the biennial budget prior to the US exit from the body, highlighting the impossible choices facing WHO as it confronts the largest financial crisis in its 76-year history. Countries said the funding cuts leave them increasingly vulnerable as new health threats emerge. “Geopolitical instability, climate change and emerging diseases reinforce the need for international cooperation and predictable financing to overcome challenges in global health system,” the delegate from Bangladesh said. “We need empathy, solidarity and unity.” Crisis deepens funding gap Despite repeatedly slashing its target for the next two-year budget, WHO still faces a $1.5 billion shortfall to cover its core work. Before the US exit, WHO’s 2026-27 budget targeted $5.3 billion over two years to cover its core operations. After Tuesday’s vote, that target dropped to $4.2 billion, a 22% reduction affecting the UN health agency’s work worldwide. During Tuesday’s budget debates, WHO officials countered criticism of cuts to cash-strapped regions with a harsh truth: every regional office outside Europe and Geneva still has more allocated funding than the agency can actually spend. “We can only implement the budget if we have the financing,” Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO, told member states. The exit of US funds has affected 23.8 million people worldwide, causing closure or reduction in services at over 2,600 health facilities, WHO’s Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee said Wednesday. The US had committed $154 million in voluntary contributions to WHO’s base budget (29% of total voluntary contributions) for 2024-25, plus another $235 million to emergency operations (15% of total voluntary contributions). But not all of this funding came through. “Along with the reduction in voluntary contributions from other donors, the freeze and withholding of voluntary contributions from the United States resulted in an 18% decrease in overall financing available,” the IOAC analysis found. Global aid for health at decade low When excluding COVID-19-related aid, health development spending is declining across many major donors. The US government under the Trump administration has slashed $60 billion in total aid, with severe implications for global health programs covering malnutrition, maternal mortality, and prevention and immunization programs for HIV, malaria, tuberculosis and other infectious diseases. The US cuts represent the extreme edge of a global trend in reducing aid, especially for healthcare. Setting aside COVID-19 spending, health-focused overseas aid in 2023 stayed beneath 2019 figures across the United States, Britain, Germany, Canada, European Union bodies, France, Italy and the Netherlands. Healthcare development funding also dropped year-over-year from 2022 to 2023 in Germany, Italy and Canada. “The share of official development assistance going to health has dropped to its lowest point in 10 years,” an analysis by ONE found in January. “All indicators suggest this will fall even lower in years to come at a time when progress against preventable deaths is at risk of backsliding.” Analysis by the Centre for Global Development classified 37 nations as “highly exposed” to US aid cuts, facing losses equivalent to 10% or more of their government’s national health expenditures. Twenty-five countries face losses of 20% or more, while 10 face losses of at least 50%. Extreme scenarios include Afghanistan, Somalia, South Sudan and Malawi, where US health aid equals 341%, 237%, 235%, and 207% of national health spending respectively. “This will also have knock-on impacts on disease detection, access to medical countermeasures, R&D, and social determinants of health from nutrition to clean water in some of the world’s most vulnerable settings,” the UK delegation said. Calls for efficiency amid crisis WHO is urging countries to look at domestic options wherever possible, using the funding crisis as a chance to reduce reliance on external health financing and build domestic infrastructure. “From expanding domestic financing to pioneering real-time data systems, many of you are advancing solutions that are scalable, sustainable and rooted in equity,” WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told ministers gathered in Geneva on Thursday. “Data and sustainable financing are not just technical matters,” Tedros added. “They are political choices. They shape who is reached, how quickly, and with what quality of care. And they determine whether we progress or fall behind.” Professor Senait Fisseha, Vice President of Global Programs at the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, urged countries to “use this moment to rethink data and financing in a way that best meets your needs and the needs of your people.” “For countries to truly lead and for funders and development partners to start to learn how to follow, data and financing are a natural place to start,” Fisseha added. “That is where ministers are telling us to start.” Development spending on health hit its lowest level in a decade in 2025. As WHO asks member states to fight the crisis with efficiency gains and data-driven approaches, members are demanding the same from the agency. Financial constraints are forcing WHO to reduce its workforce alongside other cuts. The agency’s emergency program exemplifies the squeeze, cutting its budget from $1.2 billion to $812 million while facing mounting crises. “We’ve adjusted our workforce. We’ve strategically controlled our expenses. We’ve put in place more efficient processes,” said Dr Mick Ryan, outgoing director of emergencies at WHO. “But there are headwinds… increasing frequency and intensity of conflict, increasing frequency and intensity of natural disasters and epidemics.” Discussions ahead of Tuesday’s budget vote made clear approval of the financial lifeline for the UN health agency – which included member states agreeing to the 20% membership fee increase – came with expectations that WHO would continue reform efforts to be more “efficient,” “transparent”, and “cost-effective.” “We have already taken serious measures, and we will continue to take serious measures to reform the organisation for the better,” Tedros said following the vote to approve the new budget. “There is a crisis,” he added. “But we will use this crisis as an opportunity and make sure our organization emerges sharper and more empowered.” Push for flexible funding WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Raul Thomas, the Assistant Director-General for Business Operations at WHO address the committee following the successful vote on the agency’s new budget. A demand that emerged from states at the World Health Assembly was the need for WHO funding to be flexible. Agency funding frequently comes with restrictions and is earmarked only for certain regions or projects, leaving limited resources to respond to critical issues like climate change and women’s health. “We urge flexible and non-earmarked voluntary contributions for WHO to overcome current financing constraints,” the Bangladesh delegate said. A major step in this direction came this week as member states agreed to the membership fee increase, which brings the total for the base budget funded by flexible dues up to 40%, rising from just 16% in 2020. However, the agency remains critically reliant on voluntary funds. WHO’s emergency and polio budgets rely entirely on voluntary funding and bring the total target budget for operations from 2026-27 to $6.2 billion – meaning WHO is still around 75% reliant on voluntary funds across all operations. Sri Lanka recommended WHO engage in high-level negotiations toward resource mobilisation to secure sustainable funding. “We support the call for diversified financing from global health donors, development banks and private sector partners,” the country’s delegate said. Image Credits: WHO/X, ONE, ONE. Cross-Border Collaboration Gains Political Traction as Africa Targets Visceral Leishmaniasis Elimination 21/05/2025 Paul Adepoju African health ministers pose with the signed agreement of intent to eliminate visceral leishmaniasis. In a region where war, displacement, and weak health systems fuel a deadly disease, nine African governments are trying a new approach: eliminate visceral leishmaniasis by working together. As neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) continue to strain underfunded health systems across Africa, a regional political coalition has formalised its intent to eliminate visceral leishmaniasis (VL) through cross-border collaboration. Six countries – Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan, and Sudan – signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) during a World Health Assembly side event, outlining a joint strategy for surveillance, treatment, and disease control across borders. The initiative aligns with WHO’s 2021–2030 NTD roadmap and the regional visceral leishmaniasis elimination framework launched in June 2024. “This is more than a health initiative. It is a movement for social justice, equity and development,” said Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, Director of the Global NTD Programme at the World Health Organization, who delivered remarks on behalf of WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. But while ministerial signatures and declarations signal a shift in political will, national officials said frameworks alone will not fill treatment gaps, rebuild surveillance in conflict-affected regions, or overcome decades of structural neglect. Visceral leishmaniasis is endemic to much of Eastern Africa, where outbreaks have historically defied borders, and weak infrastructure has complicated responses. The disease has killed over 200,000 people in the region in the past 40 years, and about 74 million remain at risk, according to Ethiopia’s health ministry. Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, Director of the Global Neglected Tropical Disease Programme at the World Health Organization. Sudan, currently affected by one of the world’s most severe humanitarian crises, illustrates the fragility of progress. Displacement, vector breeding in camps, and disrupted supply chains are driving a surge in untreated cases amid the raging civil war. “Today, only 21 of 44 diagnostic and treatment centres are functioning across seven states,” said a Sudanese representative. The country’s health officials are now prioritising adaptive, conflict-aware strategies, including mobile teams and decentralised logistics, but warned that regional gains could unravel without sustained support. Nigeria, while not among the signatories, voiced its intent to establish a similar MoU with neighbours. With 67 border-region local government areas, officials described cross-border VL transmission as a pressing risk. “The cost of care is steep, and we bear 25% of the global NTD burden,” said a representative on behalf of Nigeria’s Coordinating Minister of Health. “We cannot address this in isolation.” Tanzania echoed the call for accountability. “We must hold each other accountable, track progress, and adapt strategies,” said its health minister. “There is no more time for words, but we still have time for action.” Beyond coordination, speakers drew attention to persistent barriers: limited domestic financing, weak integration into primary care, and outdated tools. DNDi’s CEO, Dr Luis Pizarro, described current VL treatments as “toxic, painful, and costly,” particularly for rural populations, emphasising that research and development must no longer be viewed as a luxury. “It is not acceptable in 2025 to rely on outdated treatments,” Pizarro said. The Africa CDC urged states to rethink the framing of NTDs. “These are not neglected diseases—they are priority diseases,” said the representative of Dr. Jean Kaseya, Director General, Africa CDC, citing the need to embed NTD strategies in health security planning and push for domestic investment despite fiscal constraints. The meeting closed with ministers endorsing a call to action that commits signatory countries to concrete steps in eliminating VL, including shared data systems, joint planning, and community-based delivery. Nutrition Leaders Sound Alarm on Rising Hunger and Stalled Progress 21/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman From left: Nancy Aburto, Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Moumouni Kinda, Claudia Hudspet, and Lina Mahy GENEVA – Although the past decade has seen progress in the fight against malnutrition, 148 million children remain stunted, 45 million suffer from wasting, and anaemia affects nearly one in three women globally, according to experts at the Geneva Health Forum (GHF). In 2023 alone, 733 million people experienced hunger—152 million more than in 2019—and over 2.8 billion people were unable to afford a healthy diet. The GHF noted that malnutrition also remains a contributing factor in 45% of deaths among children under five. Looking ahead, the global nutrition crisis could worsen. Francesco Branca of the Institute of Global Health at the University of Geneva warned that the number of obese people worldwide is expected to rise from a billion today to 2.3 billion by 2050. “Nutrition has to be where we take action,” he told a room on Tuesday at Campus Biotech, where this year’s GHF side sessions of the 78th World Health Assembly are being held. “Where do we take action?” Branca asked. “It has to be people-centered. So the action has to be where the problem is. The action has to be in the centres where children are presented with malnutrition. The action has to be taken in primary health care offices where doctors find people with obesity. The action has to be where people are suffering from a lack of food, indeed, and that’s, of course, the responsibility of people providing services and people who are making decisions about those services.” The three-hour session brought together global experts from diverse sectors. It was held against the backdrop of a recent decision by WHO member states to extend the Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016-2025) to 2030, aligning it with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It also took place following the 2025 Nutrition for Growth (N4G) Summit in March, where 47 participating states made more than 400 commitments. Speakers highlighted the need for stronger governance and integrated, multisectoral approaches to combat malnutrition. They emphasised bundling services to improve efficiency, implementing regulatory measures such as taxation and food labelling, and exploring innovative financing mechanisms. According to Valerie Bellino, president of the Geneva Global Health Cooperative, the session’s aim was also to position Geneva as a driving force in promoting global nutrition solutions and to help build the long-term momentum needed to meet the 2030 targets. A ‘village’ of solutions Afshan Khan (right), Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Coordinator of the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement Afshan Khan, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Coordinator of the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement, spoke passionately about the importance of the N4G Summit. She highlighted the strong participation of civil society in the summit, describing it as “a whole village of solutions.” Khan emphasised that the event featured a whole day dedicated to showcasing best practices from civil society partners and youth-led discussions about how the intersection of nutrition, health, climate change, and conflict is shaping their lives, now and in the future. She added that there was also a dedicated day of engagement with the private sector. “We have to be able to address all forms of malnutrition and undernutrition with the right kinds of quality nutritious foods available at an affordable price, as well as having foods that are low in trans fat or sugars,” Khan explained. “A really important component is how we influence what people eat, which is influenced by what companies are putting out there on the market.” She reiterated that nutrition is not just a health concern, but a key pillar of economic development. “The Nutrition for Growth Summit helped connect the golden thread of the importance of nutrition for long-term growth and development of children, for the health of women… and also the economic imperative nutrition brings to building human capital,” she said. “There is a real opportunity to emphasise and stress more that an investment in nutrition has a $23 rate of return for each dollar,” Khan added, citing World Bank estimates. “Here we see an opportunity to show the power of nutrition and its ability to transform societies.” Still, while some countries have stepped up, others are pulling back—and the consequences are already unfolding. Khan also warned that ongoing conflicts, climate stress, and budget cuts are combining to put millions of lives at risk. “The situation in Gaza is perhaps one of the most visible and stark, because it’s clearly a man-made crisis—as is Sudan, as is Yemen,” she said. She explained that nutrition programs are often amongst the first to be cut when aid is reduced. For example, more than 600,000 people in Kenya living in drought-stricken areas are expected to lose access to lifesaving food and nutrition services. Similar cuts are taking place in Sudan. According to the Standing Together for Nutrition consortium, a 44% reduction in aid could erase decades of hard-won progress, leaving 2.3 million children without access to essential treatment. Khan warned that as many as 60% of these children may not survive without intervention: “The long-term projections on death due to some of these cuts are stark.” Learning from success A panel discussion during the session highlighted where nutrition efforts yield results, offering practical takeaways that others in the field could adapt to their national contexts. Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Assistant Secretary and executive director of the National Nutrition Council in the Philippines, shared that her country faces a triple burden of malnutrition: undernutrition, overnutrition, and micronutrient deficiencies. To address this, the government launched a multisectoral platform centred on what she called “ABCDY,” where A stands for academia, B for businesses, C for civil society, D for donors, and Y for youth. She explained that these nutrition-focused collaborations are being implemented at all levels, from the federal government to local government units. “What is unique about the Philippines is that we have 7,000 islands—geographically isolated areas where malnutrition is highest,” Milana-Dayanghirang explained. To tackle these challenges, the government rolled out the Philippine Plan of Action for Nutrition (PPAN), a six-year strategy from 2023 to 2028. The plan focusses on three core pillars: promoting healthier diets, fostering improved social behaviours, and strengthening governance. “We develop policies,” Milana-Dayanghirang said. She pointed to one example: the Philippines instituted a sugar-sweetened beverage tax that has effectively reduced consumption, especially amongst teenagers and children. She added that the country is now in the final stages of approving a national nutrient profiling model and food labelling program—tools she hopes will further strengthen the country’s nutrition agenda. From left: Nancy Aburto, Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Moumouni Kinda, Claudia Hudspet, and Lina Mahy In an Africa case study, Moumouni Kinda, director of the Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA), shared that globally the treatment of children for malnutrition has expanded significantly, from treating no children for malnutrition 55 years ago to nearly nine million in 2023. Last year, Alima teams treated 350,000 malnourished children in 13 countries. However, despite this progress, Kinda said his teams receive weekly reports from more than a dozen countries warning of imminent food shortages. Amongst the hardest-hit nations are Niger, Chad, and Nigeria. “The violent shutdown of USAID and funding cuts in the United Kingdom and Europe are worsening an already critical situation,” Kinda warned. “But we have hope.” He explained that that hope lies in the potential to secure more sustainable, local sources of funding. Like the Philippines, Kinda suggested that more African countries could implement a sugar-sweetened beverage tax to help finance nutrition programs. He emphasised that the tax could be modest—”only one cent”—but if adopted by several countries, it could have a significant impact. “If we approach 10 countries, this could be about $1.4 billion annually,” Kinda said, noting that such a sum could help treat millions of children across the continent. The WHO’s Lina Mahy highlighted significant funding imbalances in the global food system. She pointed out that during the COVID-19 pandemic, from 2020 to 2022, the food industry made approximately $1 billion in profit every two days. In that same period, 62 new food billionaires emerged. “We have to put that into perspective,” Mahy said. “We need to talk about – these power imbalances and inequalities and how to address them. WHO is ready to talk about these elephants in the room.” Investing in food systems The Aga Khan Foundation is working to help fill funding and service gaps in the global nutrition space. Claudia Hudspet, the organisation’s global health lead, said the foundation has committed more than $45 million over the next five years to better integrate nutrition into healthcare systems and improve access to affordable, healthy food. One of the foundation’s key programs is the Central Asia Stunting Initiative (CASI), which targets high stunting rates in remote parts of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan. The program is designed to improve maternal and child health outcomes by supporting frontline health workers in assessing and addressing nutritional needs. In partnership with the Aga Khan Health Service and local partners in Pakistan, the foundation helped develop a mobile application for Lady Health Visitors (LHVs) in the Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral regions. The app enables LHVs (health workers that specialise in maternal anc child care) to assess the nutritional status of pregnant women, mothers, and children during household visits and provide targeted nutrition supplements when needed. “The Central Asia Stunting Initiative really looks at integration into health systems,” Hudspet explained. She said a major focus is increasing the number of women giving birth in health facilities and ensuring that newborns are weighed at delivery. “It’s a very simple intervention, but many babies aren’t weighed at birth, and we miss a lot of those low birth weight and small for gestational age babies, and we’re not able to give them the best start in life,” she said. “Identifying growth faltering and catching children before they lose weight or stature… improves our chances of success.” In addition to stunting prevention, the foundation is working to integrate nutrition into early childhood development efforts through the Nurturing Care Framework. Hudspet also emphasised the foundation’s growing interest in food systems, particularly the links between agriculture, climate resilience, and nutrition. One of its flagship programs in this area is the Indian Ocean Coastal Regeneration Initiative (IOCRI), which Hudspet described as supporting sustainable livelihoods in coastal communities while restoring degraded ecosystems. The program aims to rehabilitate 100,000 hectares of coastal lands and strengthen local economies through renewable energy and nature-based solutions. “While this is a climate initiative, initially, we also are integrating nutrition through things like blue foods; aquaculture nutrition champions looking at food supply and social behaviour,” Hudspet said. Because the foundation and Aga Khan University are part of the same network, the foundation can also leverage data to monitor program impact and adapt as needed. “We monitor these programs very intensively, and tweak and learn from them,” she said. Nutrition as a climate health strategy Climate change also added 41 days of dangerous heat in 2024, according to a report jointly produced by the team at World Weather Attribution (WWA) and Climate Central. Nancy Aburto, Deputy Director of the Food and Nutrition Division at the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), said the growing body of data around food insecurity and its consequences offers new opportunities to move from talk to action. “I’m going to start with a statistic that’s not very pretty,” she told the room. “It’s 2.8 billion people worldwide [who] cannot afford a healthy diet.” But Aburto said that knowing this figure—and having tracked it for several years—has pushed researchers and policymakers to seek tangible solutions. One of the clearest, she said, lies in how we spend existing agricultural support. “In 2022, the State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World report documented that worldwide support for food and agriculture was almost $630 billion a year,” she said. When combined with recent true cost accounting from FAO that shows unhealthy diets account for about 70% of the $10 trillion in hidden costs to health systems, the case for repurposing that investment becomes even stronger. “It tells us that we can repurpose that $630 billion a year to something that can help us reduce that $10 trillion cost burden on our health systems,” Aburto explained. “And that is moving us towards solutions for repurposing agricultural investments to diverse, nutritious foods, which can absolutely be monumental.” She added that food systems reform has benefits beyond nutrition. According to Aburto, shifting diets could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the food and agriculture sector by up to 13%. The environmental benefit doesn’t stop there—healthier diets can also help protect forests, water systems, and biodiversity. “This means enabling healthy diets is not just a solution for the nutrition community,” she said. “It’s a solution for the environmental community as well.” Image Credits: Maayan Hoffman, WMO. Next Steps: Tension About How to Settle the Pandemic Agreement’s Annex 21/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Lancet editor Richard Horton (left) moderates a panel with Helen Clark, Precious Matsoso and Raj Panjabi at the Geneva Graduate Institute. There are tensions between World Health Organization (WHO) member states about how to approach the final negotiations on the pandemic agreement – an annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing system (PABS), according to Precious Matsoso, who co-chaired the negotiations. “There’s an argument about whether you invite experts to start working on a technical document and then invite member states to discuss the details and negotiate amongst themselves, or get member states to submit their inputs and discuss and only then would you invite experts,” Matsoso told on event at the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute on Tuesday. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), co-chaired by Matsoso of South Africa and French Global Health Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou, hands the PABS talks to an Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG). The working group is supposed to conclude talks on annex by next year’s WHA and, once adopted, the pandemic agreement will then be open for signature and ratification. Once 60 countries have ratified it, the agreement will enter into force. The IGWG will also begin to set up a Coordinating Financial Mechanism for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and the Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network (GSCL). Helen Clark, co-chair of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, said the IGWG was expected to start work in September. She flagged the 2026 United Nations High-Level Meeting on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response as an opportunity to “push for rapid ratification” – or agreement on the annex if it has not yet been passed. “The message we could send out to countries is: start looking at your national procedures and doing your national tests, and be ready to run on ratification when the annex is actually agreed,” Clark told the Graduate School audience. Clark added that while South Africa, as chair of the G20, was supportive of pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, the US was due to assume the chair in 2026. “Will they take the chair next year, or will it pass to someone else? If they take the chair, what hope is there for any of this? That’s an open question. I’m not a diplomat, so I can put this question on the on the table. If they take the chair, it could be treading water for a year, for with G20,” said Clark, who is a former Prime Minister of New Zealand. Role of EU in talks Speaking shortly after the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary adopted the pandemic agreement, Matsoso said that the “Slovakia drama” raised questions about how regional blocs operated during negotiations. Slovakia, whose Prime Minister Robert Fico is opposed to mRNA vaccines, demanded a vote on the pandemic agreement resolution during a committee discussion on Monday night. The resolution was passed by 124 votes in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. But Matsoso said Slovakia was part of the European Union (EU), which had negotiated as a bloc, so it should have been party to the regional position. Matsoso added that some of the countries that had abstained had explained they “were still going through their own internal processes, and had not been given a mandate to vote” as they had expected the agreement would be adopted by consensus. Dr Raj Panjabi, former White House official under Joe Biden, said there were three things to watch to ensure the pandemic agreement was implemented: independent monitoring and clear accountability; adequate financing, and “increasing regional self reliance”. “Ensuring that financing is stepped up [is] very hard in this moment when overseas development assistance is being pulled back, not just by my country, the United States, but by several others,” said Panjabi. “The WHO is more strained than ever, and that’s why ensuring that assessed contributions are increased is going to be critical, as is harmonising and leveraging other funds in the system,” said Panjabi. Regional self-reliance Panjabi defined regional self reliance as “an entire end-to-end focus, from research and development, investment and innovation to enhancing manufacturing and ensuring that the delivery of counter-measures in the next pandemic occurs,” said Panjabi. Swedish global health expert Anders Nordström (left) moderates a panel with Diah Saminarsih, Eloise Todd, Michel Kazatchkine and Mariangelo Simao. However, Brazil’s deputy minister of health, Mariângela Simão, warned that, while there is a G20 coalition on local and regional production, “there’s so much that you can do at country level”. “Research and Development is one of the things that I’m more worried about – the capacity to copy what’s already developed and make safe and quality-assured products. We don’t need reinventing the wheel everywhere. We need to recognise what are global public goods and then make sure they are available at country level… you can’t have everyone producing everything.” UNAIDS special adviser Michel Kazatchkine said that he could not see a world “that is just a juxtaposition of regions without any glue, without any coordination, without any compass”. This, he added, is the role of the WHO, providing “vaccine blueprints, pre-qualification, its normative role”. In the future, global health “will not look like a top-down construction that it has been with money flowing from Geneva to various places”, Kazatchkine stressed. “The international money will be there to complement the national and the regional efforts, because global health is also about global solidarity.” But Eloise Todd, who leads the Pandemic Action Network (PAN), noted that one of the biggest learnings from the COVID pandemic is “definitely no country, and certainly no region that can do it all themselves”. “We’re in a very uncomfortable place in which we know that there are modernisations and ways in which we need to reform to support the regionalisation agenda and the country agenda, but we certainly shouldn’t be doing it at the pace and with the disregard being done at present. “We’re in this tension between the excellent work that some global entities do to fill a gap. And so what do you do about that? You can’t cut it away and risk lives, but we have to have, like, a 10 ,15, 20-year conversation about powering that down and getting towards proper national and regional level intersectionality.” Nations Approve WHO Membership Fee Increase as US Exit Squeezes Budget 20/05/2025 Stefan Anderson Delegates gathered on Tuesday at the World Health Assembly agreed a new WHO budget for the 2026–2027 period which included a rise in membership fees. Photo WHO/Pierre Albouy. Nations at the 78th World Health Assembly approved a new budget and a 20% increase in annual membership fees for the World Health Organisation (WHO), handing the embattled UN health agency a crucial lifeline as it grapples with the financial bomb dropped on Geneva by the United States’ withdrawal from international institutions. The vote marks the second consecutive 20% hike in membership dues in as many budgets, which the agency’s member states approve on a biennial basis, the last coming in 2024. The move is part of a long-term plan to boost mandatory contributions from 16% of WHO’s core budget at the start of the decade to 50% by 2030 to reduce its dependence on the whims of major donors like the now-departed US. These membership fees provide the organization with flexible funding it can allocate according to its own priorities, unlike the voluntary contributions that typically come strictly earmarked by donors for specific programmes that have historically made up the vast majority of the WHO’s budget. Under the new budget, assessed contributions will make up 40% of the WHO’s base program budget of $4.2 billion for the 2026-27 period. The core budget does not include emergency humanitarian appeals or polio programmes, which bring the total budget target up to $6.2 billion. The fee increase, initially mandated in a 2022 resolution at the WHO’s executive assembly, faced an uncertain path to approval on Tuesday, with member nations engaging in tense pre-vote debates over the fairness of regional funding cuts in the new budget – which will run for two years starting in 2026 – and demands for greater transparency in expenditure tracking. Projected financing for the base programmes segment of the budget for 2026–2027, compared to previous bienniums, in US$ million. A battle of buzzwords played out during the proceedings: supporters of the fee increase championed “flexible, predictable, sustainable and agile” funding, while skeptics countered with demands for “efficiency,” “transparency,” elimination of “redundancy” and “cost-effectiveness” – signaling clearly that the WHO’s financial reprieve comes with strings and expectations attached. WHO officials had acknowledged in the budget document they were “cognizant that such an increase will not be automatically granted” amid overlapping global crises straining national budgets worldwide. In the end, a collective recognition of the existential financial threat facing the agency carried the budget over the line. The chamber fell silent during the vote, with no objections raised. “There is a crisis,” WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared following the vote. “But we will use this crisis as an opportunity and make sure our organisation emerges sharper and more empowered.” Germany’s delegation, the WHO’s most important financial backer since the American departure, hailed the decision as “historic” — but not before voicing their support in song. “I tell you what I want, what I really, really want,” the German representative sang in an awkward rendition of the Spice Girls hit befitting the oft-lively proceedings of Committee A, “and that is that we all indeed are serious about functioning and effective multilateralism.” “The increase is the best vaccination against the highest financial risk that WHO faces,” he added, “its dependency on a very few donors, and the discrepancy between the expectations we all put on the organisation and its ability to fulfil them.” Financial triage Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. The agency has been in financial triage mode since the US exit announcement in November, implementing drastic budget reductions to secure votes that earned praise from member states for its “budgetary realism.” Before the US departure, the 2026-27 budget required to fulfill WHO’s core mission was projected at $5.3 billion over the two year period. Following Tuesday’s vote, the target plummeted to $4.2 billion, a 22% cut that will impact the agency’s operations worldwide. The revised budget represents a $700 million decrease from projections presented at WHO’s January executive board meeting, but even this diminished figure approved in Geneva remains aspirational. Level of projected financing for the base programmes segment of the Proposed programme budget 2026–2027, US$ million. While WHO secured an additional $170 million toward its 2026-27 budget Tuesday evening following major commitments of $50 million a year from China and first-time donors Mongolia and Cambodia, among others, the agency still faces a $1.5 billion funding shortfall on top of the $1.1 billion decrease from previous budget projections. The two new donor nations join 42 additional first-time voluntary contributors to WHO, including seven low-income and 28 lower-middle and upper-middle income countries. “With the exception of the headquarters and the European region, the allocated or proposed budget for every regional office is currently higher, even after the reduction, than the projected implementation,” explained Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. Without additional contributions, further life-threatening program cuts loom. All of the WHO’s six regions face significant cuts heading into the 2026-27 period covered by the budget. Regional office budgets are set to fall by 14%, with the African region facing the largest total cut of $153 million year-on-year. The agency’s Geneva headquarters will lose nearly a quarter of its annual funding. China announced it will contribute $500 million to the WHO over the next five-year period, though it was unclear whether this includes the 20% increase in its fee contributions. This will make China, for the first time, the largest fee payer in the WHO, supplanting the US as it exits. “We can only implement the budget if we have the financing,” Hollo said, noting the “personal sacrifice” that member states will need to make should the funding target remain unmet. More freedom, less money WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Raul Thomas, the Assistant Director-General for Business Operations at WHO address the committee following the successful vote. The WHO’s budget victory comes amid a zero-sum competition for international aid dollars, with UN agencies and humanitarian organisations worldwide scrambling to fill gaps left by America’s retreat from global commitments. Since January, the White House has systematically dismantled the US Agency for International Development (USAID) – historically the world’s largest humanitarian donor – while slashing support for the United Nations and WHO’s sister agencies. By March, over 80% of USAID programs had been shuttered, punching a $60 billion hole in global aid budgets. This broader retreat from international commitments has left organisations like the UN Refugee Agency and Office for Humanitarian Affairs and non-governental humanitarian organisations scrambling for resources just as the WHO does the same, creating unprecedented competition for a dwindling pool of donor funds that no single government appears willing or able to replenish. In the latest sign of distress, top UN officials told staff at a town hall in New York City Tuesday that the organization is considering a 20% reduction across every secretariat under the UN umbrella for 2026 — from humanitarian affairs, to human rights, peacekeeping operations, and development programs — heightening the financial crisis in the world of international institutions and those who depend on them. Several major financial contributors to WHO, including Germany, France, and the EU delegation, pressed the agency to develop contingency plans for potential fundraising shortfalls as the UN system creaks under the weight of the US withdrawal. “Should the resources, the $1.65 billion, not materialise, the idea is that we will be in a position to actually scale back or ramp up,” said Raul Thomas, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for business operations who led the budget consultations with member states. “We never know – I’m the eternal optimist. Maybe we’ll get much more money than the 1.65 million. That’s the gap right now.” Presidents and Prime Ministers Celebrate the Passing of the Pandemic Agreement 20/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan WHO officials including the co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso (right) celebrate the World Health Assembly’s adoption of the pandemic agreement. Presidents, prime ministers and even opera singers, celebrated the unanimous adoption of the world’s first Pandemic Agreement by consensus at the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary on Tuesday morning. Despite the 11th-hour insistence of Slovakia on a vote on the agreement in Committee A on Monday night, none of the World Health Organization (WHO) member states obstructed the agreement’s adoption at the plenary. Instead, it was presented as a rare example of successful multilateral engagement in a world of heightened conflict. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço commended the WHO’s resilience in the face of “unfair and unjust criticism”, and pledged an additional $8 million from his country to the WHO. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço Speaking on behalf of the 55 AU member states, Lourenço said the continent is “united in supporting the proposal to increase assessed contributions” [membership fees] as “the WHO is the only institution with a universal mandate to protect global health and promote equity”. China’s Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong pledged an “additional quota of $500 million over five years” to the WHO, at the plenary, and urged all countries to “support the WHO to play a central coordinating role in global health governance” and enable it “to perform its duty in an independent, professional and science-based manner”. Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, also in the room, described the WHO as “a beacon of hope and a guardian of humanity’s right to health”. Plenković described sustainable financing of the WHO as “a strategic imperative” to enable “timely responses to emergencies and meaningful support where it is needed most”. Egyptian opera singer Farrah El-Dibany and soprano singers Elaine Vidal and Eunice Miller of the Philippines also performed for the assembly. Macron appeals to US scientists Emmanuel Macron addresses the WHA plenary in a recorded message. “Our first line of defence is the WHO,” said French President Emmanuel Macron in a recorded message. He then appealed to “all those researchers who want to freely continue to do their work” – a veiled reference to US scientists dismissed during US President Donald Trump’s massive budget cuts – to move to Europe. “We will be happy to welcome you in Europe, because that will be good for Europe, for medical research, for you and for everyone. It’s not a question of ‘if’ we will have a new pandemic. It’s a question of ‘when’ we’ll have it,” said Macron. South African and G20 President Cyril Ramaphosa, and the leaders of the Philippines, Peru, Mongolia and Senegal also sent recorded messages of support. The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a coherent global health architecture and described the pandemic agreement as “historic”. As one leader after another defended the WHO and multilateralism, Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO loomed as the elephant in the room – and the target of unspoken rebuke. So it was timely – but also surprising – that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr also sent a recorded message to the plenary. Unlike the other messages, however, Kennedy claimed that the WHO “has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest and international power politics”. “The WHO has not even come to terms with its failures during COVID, let alone made significant reforms. Instead, it has doubled down with the pandemic agreement, which will lock in all of the dysfunctions of the WHO pandemic response,” he added, without articulating any specific US objections to the agreement. ‘Eyes on the prize’ Namibian Health Minister and chair of Committee A, Dr Esperance Luvindao, Dr Tedros and Dr Mike Ryan applauding the vote on the pandemic agreement in Committee A on Monday night. Addressing the plenary after the leaders’ messages, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus paid tribute to those who negotiated the pandemic agreement. “You have engaged in very tough negotiations. Sometimes the disagreements were sharp, the discussions heated and the frustration evident. Sometimes it seemed the distance between you might be too great to overcome. But you kept your eyes on the prize, and did not stop until you had achieved it,” said Tedros, adding that sometimes delegates had talked all night in the windowless basement room of the WHO headquarters where the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) met. “The pandemic agreement has been negotiated by countries for countries, and will be implemented in countries in accordance with their own national laws,” stressed Tedros, referring to the “torrent of mis- and disinformation” that claimed the agreement will “infringe on national sovereignty” and give the WHO Secretariat “power to impose mask or vaccine mandates or lockdowns. “Today, you have sent a loud message that multilateralism not only works, but is the only way to find shared solutions to shared threats. Let’s not understate what you have achieved. You have made the world a safer place,” stressed Tedros. Pathogens ‘won’t wait’ The agreement was welcomed by the co-chairs of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, former President of Liberia, and Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand. “Consider this agreement a foundation from which to build, starting today,” said Clark. “Many gaps remain in finance, equitable access to medical countermeasures and in understanding evolving risks. Don’t wait to get started. Dangerous pathogens are looming, and they certainly will not wait. The Third World Network said that the “next phases of negotiations, beginning with the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), will determine whether this agreement becomes a meaningful tool for equity or if it remains merely symbolic”. “At stake is the ability of developing countries to access affordable vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics swiftly and fairly during health emergencies and to realize the ambition of a fairer and more effective global health architecture that can equitably prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics,” said TWN. Dr David Reddy, director-general of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), said that, as the next level of detail of the agreement is worked through, it is essential that the experience of pharmaceutical companies is drawn upon “so that their expertise can be mobilized when needed”. This includes how the PABS will work “where we must make sure that companies are able to access the pathogens and sequence information as quickly as possible to undertake scientific research and avoid unnecessary conditions that make it harder for companies to do so”, Reddy stressed. He added that “intellectual property protections that are essential for pharmaceutical companies to invest in high-risk R&D, must not be eroded and instead should enable partnerships on voluntary and mutually agreed terms, in a way that draws on the expertise and networks of each company.” ‘US is not indispensible’ Public Citizen Access to Medicines Director Peter Maybarduk said that “WHO member states chose health and justice today, despite RFK’s cheap insult, the reckless US withdrawal and Trump’s deadly neglect of infectious disease threats. “The world moved forward without the US today. Trump’s devastating cuts cast a shadow on the talks, and are on course to cost millions of lives, including the lives of Americans made more vulnerable to infectious disease,” said Maybarduk. “Still, countries came together amidst scarcity to commit themselves to a more just and healthy world, and that is worth celebrating.” Matthew Kavanagh, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Global Health Policy and Politics, said that the US “did not show up for the final negotiations but it turns out the US is not indispensable and, in fact, perhaps not having the US engaged is what enabled more cooperation.” “With the current administration seemingly intent on dismantling global public health efforts, it may be the best case scenario if the rest of the world can come together. In that way, this new agreement is a spot of light in and otherwise dark geopolitical environment for fighting pandemics,” Kavanagh told Health Policy Watch. Image Credits: WHO. Can Technology Tame the NCD Crisis? Experts Call for Smarter, Inclusive Digital Health Solutions 20/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman Digital blood pressure monitoring devices have now become widely available The pace of technological change today is nothing short of revolutionary, according to Dr Douglas Bettcher, Senior Advisor in the Director-General’s Office at the World Health Organization (WHO). “I think we find ourselves very strangely in the last couple of years, in what seems to be a really brave new world, brave new reality,” he told attendees at Monday’s Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF) event, which focused on how digital innovations could help prevent and manage noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). “A case can be made that this communications revolution is even greater and more mind-boggling than what we’ve seen in the past,” Bettcher continued. “Even some pundits in the know compare this to the 19th-century industrial revolution. And what must be clear to us, being confronted with these very, very rapid changes, is that we in the public health community cannot be left standing during this digital innovation, this mass revolution.” Bettcher, who discussed WHO’s Be He@lthy, Be Mobile (BHBM) program, stressed that the train has already left the station. Industries that harm health are already leveraging artificial intelligence and related technologies. Now, he said, it’s time for those working to improve health to use them too. The Monday event—hosted as a side event of the 78th World Health Assembly—was a collaboration between GSCF, WHO, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Titled “Empowering Self-Care: Digital Innovations for NCD Prevention and Management,” it highlighted the vital role of self-care and digital technology in tackling NCDs, emphasizing cross-sector collaboration. Keynote addresses were given by H.E. Honourable Tuafafa Latasi, a member of the Tuvalu parliament, and Dr Dympna Kavanagh, the Chief Dental Officer of Ireland’s Department of Health. “Digital innovation has the power to transform healthcare and how we look after ourselves,” said moderator Shiulie Ghosh. “That is the role of digital innovation in preventing and managing some of the biggest causes of death across the globe.” She emphasized that digital tools can improve access to self-care and empower individuals living with NCDs to monitor and manage their conditions effectively. GSCF Director-General Greg Perry added, “We are at a pivotal moment in NCDs,” referring to WHO’s release last week of the zero draft of the political declaration on NCDs and mental health. The draft was published in preparation for the upcoming High-Level Meeting on September 25. Greg Perry (center) The declaration outlines proposed global targets for 2030: 150 million fewer people using tobacco 150 million more people managing their hypertension 150 million more people gaining access to mental health care The 10-page draft includes a set of five sub-targets, offering a roadmap for reaching these ambitious goals. “Digital tools can play a very, very important part,” Perry told the audience. “When we talk about self-care, we’re not just about keeping fit, eating correctly, or even brushing our teeth. We’re talking about the necessary tools for people to self-care.” These tools may include medicines and digital applications from the industry’s perspective. “If you add AI and digital applications together with the current and future self-care tools that are available and will be available, we are on the verge of almost a self-care revolution,” Perry said. “These [tools] will be accessible, they’ll be self-managed, and they will have a very high impact.” Making digital self-care tools useful and trusted One key challenge with emerging digital self-care tools is the lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into people’s daily lives. Luis Lourenço of the International Pharmaceutical Federation noted that pharmacists are often the first point of contact when individuals seek advice or support related to digital tools. “When you talk about the impact of digital tools on primary health care, you can focus on four major areas: prevention, health literacy, diagnosis, and the management of a chronic disease,” Lourenço said. He added that health literacy is often one of the most complicated aspects. While having access to information is essential, Lourenço emphasized that it’s not enough. People also need to understand the information and apply it in their routines. “What’s the point of having information about your blood pressure if you don’t understand what it means or when to incorporate it?” he asked. “What we have today is a lot of access to information, but people rely a lot, mostly on their healthcare partners, healthcare professionals, and pharmacists.” Without that support, he said, people may have information but not know how to use it effectively. Lourenço also pointed out that people want to be sure the tools they use are evidence-based and trustworthy. However, Debbie Rogers, CEO of Reach Digital Health, offered a slightly different perspective, suggesting that if digital tools provide enough value, people will ultimately trust them. Addressing accessibility, accountability, and inclusion Another key challenge is user hesitation, particularly among specific populations, about whether they want to use digital tools at all. “On one hand, we have developed countries. We have higher literacy levels. We have digital-savvy sort of people,” explained Hussain Jafri of the World Patient Alliance. “They are using [digital tools] and giving us very good results. But then you look at the other populations—at the lower- and middle-income countries and the elderly population, the people who are not tech-savvy. They are not really using them.” Jafri shared that he once downloaded an app designed for people with pre-diabetes but found it too complicated and deleted it after only a few days. Experts said encouraging adoption also depends on better integration of these tools into healthcare systems, where people feel accountable for the data they enter. Lourenço noted that if patients knew their doctors were reviewing the data collected in an app, it would likely motivate them to use the tool more consistently. Jafri stressed that companies developing digital health technologies must involve users, patients, and providers early in the design process, rather than waiting until products are already on the market. “I think they also need to take into account our input—the input of the people who are going to use [the tools] should also be there while they’re developing these products, so that, you know, once it is out there, people are happy using it,” he said. Language accessibility is another barrier. Jafri emphasized the importance of localization. “These [tools] need to be in multiple languages, not just English,” he said, adding that companies should also provide training for providers and patients to ensure successful adoption. Empowering mothers through technology: South African case study A pregnant woman in Africa (illustrative) There are already promising examples of how digital health tools are making a difference, as illustrated by Rogers of Reach Digital Health. She shared a case from South Africa, where hypertension during pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. “We have a program called MomConnect, where every mother who comes into the clinic can sign up to receive messaging throughout her pregnancy and until her baby is two years old,” Rogers explained. The mothers receive both information and behavior-change tips. They can also ask questions and provide feedback to the system. Because hypertension is such a critical issue, the National Department of Health wanted to better understand the root causes. They started by asking mothers about their experience during their first antenatal visit: Did they have their blood pressure taken? Were they told what the results were? If so, were they prescribed the appropriate medication? “It was important to understand that patient journey, understand where the challenges were, and to do this at a national scale,” Rogers said. Based on the insights gathered, the department introduced targeted training for healthcare workers. This effort helped drive increased demand for quality care from the patients themselves. “We got mothers to go back to their clinic and say, ‘You didn’t take my blood pressure last time. I want you to take my blood pressure,’ or ‘you didn’t put me on the right medication.'” Rogers concluded that this initiative “shows the power of being able to empower people, both with information and behavior change, communication knowledge, so they knew what they had to ask for and what they were looking out for.” Carl Massonneau, Technical Officer for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research for the WHO, speaking from the audience, explained that another tool recently released by the World Health Organization is the Digital Adaptation Kit for Antenatal Care. The kit translates WHO recommendations into machine-readable formats, making integrating them into digital health systems easier. Carl Massonneau of the WHO One specific feature of the kit is a tool for self-monitoring blood pressure among pregnant women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders. That tool will be released next week. “It’s the first time we’re putting a step in this world and trying to provide standards to improve the quality of digital health interventions we have,” Massonneau said. He acknowledged that although a growing number of digital technologies are available, there are still major challenges in ensuring they are evidence-based, equitable, and accessible. Integrating Digital Tools Into Broader NCD Strategies As the conversation around digital health tools evolves, experts caution that no single solution will address the full complexity of noncommunicable diseases. Lourenço noted that while some aspects of NCDs fall under primary prevention, where individuals can be empowered to make healthier choices, others require more structured support. He said that strategic outreach, including digital media, can help move people from “pre-contemplation to contemplation,” encouraging them to recognize risks, develop motivation, and ultimately commit to change. However, he emphasized that many behaviors tied to NCDs cannot be addressed through self-care alone. These require ongoing guidance and system-level support. Effective management, Lourenço said, demands full integration within a broader framework—” at the policy level, at the health system level, [and] at the community level.” In this context, digital innovation is not a silver bullet but a key part of a larger ecosystem—one that must be built with intentional design, inclusive access, and cross-sector collaboration to truly transform outcomes in global health. Image Credits: Marco Verch/Flickr , Provided by Global Self-Care Foundation, Elizabeth Poll/MMV, Elaine Fletcher. Country After Country Endorse Pandemic Agreement in Enormous Show of Support 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Countries indicating their wish to speak about the pandemic agreement in Committee A An enormous list of World Health Organization (WHO) member states, 173 in all, lined up to speak in favour of the pandemic agreement at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on Monday – an extraordinary demonstration of the breadth of support for the document. By the end yesterday’s meeting of Committee A, member states passed the pandemic agreement resolution by vote not consensus – at the insistence of Slovakia – with 124 in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. The WHA plenary is due to consider the resolution on Tuesday. But between the cheers were reminders that the talks are not yet done. An annex still needs to be negotiated to establish the mechanisms for a pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) system – the most controversial aspect of the three-year talks. The PABS system will develop a mechanism for how countries that share information about pathogens with pandemic potential may benefit if pharmaceutical products are developed as a result. “As a country that has shared its pathogens, often without equitable returns, the PABS system is paramount in rectifying these imbalances and ensuring the realisation of genuine equity and equitable access,” said South African Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, speaking for the Africa region in Committee A, where the document was being discussed. The Africa region sees the target of 20% of pandemic products being reserved for the WHO for distribution to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by manufacturers participating in PABS, with at least 10% as a donation, during future pandemics, as a “positive first step”, added Motsoaledi. Speaker after speaker urged countries to maintain their political commitment to the PABS negotiations and reach an agreement on the annex before next year’s WHA. Even Hungary, a staunch ally of United States President Donald Trump, welcomed the agreement – and stressed that it did not infringe on countries’ sovereignty, a key claim of disinformation about the pandemic. Trump distanced the US from the pandemic agreement at the outset of his presidency in January, and many of his MAGA supporters claim it is a “power grab” by the WHO. Iran and Paraguay said they could not support the current pandemic agreement draft – reserving support until after the PABS negotiations. Meanwhile, Slovakia, which is led by Prime Minister Robert Fico who has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccines, demanded that the agreement be put to a vote during the committee session. Delegates at WHA’s Committee A after it adopted the pandemic agreeemnt by vote First ‘One Health’ agreement Germany said it “would have welcomed stronger provisions, particularly regarding prevention,” but “recognise this agreement as a critical and timely step toward global solidarity and multilateralism”. “We urge all member states to engage in the upcoming annex negotiations with the same political will and unity that have brought us this far. Let us continue to invest in international cooperation and global solidarity, not only to protect our citizens, but also to lay the groundwork that future generations can benefit from,” said Germany. Switzerland, which has sought to protect its pharmaceutical sector during talks, said it supports “a pragmatic, voluntary approach within existing frameworks, that take into account the advice and contributions from experts”. The European Union said that the agreement “marks an important accomplishment for global health security and cooperation” and “can bolster country capacities to prevent and prepare for pandemics using the One Health approach”. Ireland added that “the commitment to [pandemic] prevention through a One Health approach is the first of its kind to recognise the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health in our response to emerging health trends”. “The establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network and a pathogen access and benefit sharing system will ensure that the response to future health threats will be faster, more effective and more equitable,” it added. China said the agreement “will contribute to the fair distribution of health products, relevant technologies and resources to help developing countries enhance their capacities for prevention, preparedness and response” – but that it needed “some follow-up mechanisms, as well as sustained investment and capacity building efforts from all countries” to be effective. Kazakhstan said that “this is not just a global legal document. It is our collective response to a future where everybody will be protected, regardless of their economic position or status. We must underscore that the success outcome will be defined not only by its content, but also by its ability the state’s ability to implement it.” Jamaica, speaking for 22 countries in the Americas and Caribbean (excluding the USA), said the region was ready to do the work to finish the pandemic agreement. “We remember too vividly the oxygen shortages, the overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare workers, and over seven million lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jamaica. “For the Americas, this agreement means stronger commitments to regional manufacturing capacity, coordinated surveillance, research and development and transfer of technology, especially for developing countries.” ‘The worst of times’ INB co-chairs Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso Co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), South Africa’s Precious Matsoso and French Ambassador for Global Health Anne-Claire Amprou, also addressed the session, expressing appreciation to member states for their commitment. Matsoso reminded the WHA that the special assembly called to establish the INB was convened “at a time when we all wore masks, we practised social distancing, and we had face-to-face meetings that were highly restricted”. “It was the worst of times, the season of despair, of tragic losses, immeasurable devastation – all associated with COVID-19,” said Matsoso. She praised delegates for working through “13 formal rounds of negotiations, many of them extended, producing various iterations of draft pandemic agreement and proposals that have culminated into what we have before us as a consensus draft”. Amprou, who took over as co-chair from Roland Driece of the Netherlands in July 2024, said that the process involved “three years of dialogue, of compromise, of debates, of sleepless nights, but above all, three years guided by a common conviction that health is a common good”. “The COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for us all. It was a brutal reminder of the fact that viruses know no borders. No country, however powerful, can address a global health crisis on its own,” said Amprou. Meanwhile, former co-chair Driece spoke for the Netherlands, expressed his appreciation that the long process had resulted in an agreement. Image Credits: WHO. Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Cross-Border Collaboration Gains Political Traction as Africa Targets Visceral Leishmaniasis Elimination 21/05/2025 Paul Adepoju African health ministers pose with the signed agreement of intent to eliminate visceral leishmaniasis. In a region where war, displacement, and weak health systems fuel a deadly disease, nine African governments are trying a new approach: eliminate visceral leishmaniasis by working together. As neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) continue to strain underfunded health systems across Africa, a regional political coalition has formalised its intent to eliminate visceral leishmaniasis (VL) through cross-border collaboration. Six countries – Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan, and Sudan – signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) during a World Health Assembly side event, outlining a joint strategy for surveillance, treatment, and disease control across borders. The initiative aligns with WHO’s 2021–2030 NTD roadmap and the regional visceral leishmaniasis elimination framework launched in June 2024. “This is more than a health initiative. It is a movement for social justice, equity and development,” said Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, Director of the Global NTD Programme at the World Health Organization, who delivered remarks on behalf of WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. But while ministerial signatures and declarations signal a shift in political will, national officials said frameworks alone will not fill treatment gaps, rebuild surveillance in conflict-affected regions, or overcome decades of structural neglect. Visceral leishmaniasis is endemic to much of Eastern Africa, where outbreaks have historically defied borders, and weak infrastructure has complicated responses. The disease has killed over 200,000 people in the region in the past 40 years, and about 74 million remain at risk, according to Ethiopia’s health ministry. Dr Ibrahima Socé Fall, Director of the Global Neglected Tropical Disease Programme at the World Health Organization. Sudan, currently affected by one of the world’s most severe humanitarian crises, illustrates the fragility of progress. Displacement, vector breeding in camps, and disrupted supply chains are driving a surge in untreated cases amid the raging civil war. “Today, only 21 of 44 diagnostic and treatment centres are functioning across seven states,” said a Sudanese representative. The country’s health officials are now prioritising adaptive, conflict-aware strategies, including mobile teams and decentralised logistics, but warned that regional gains could unravel without sustained support. Nigeria, while not among the signatories, voiced its intent to establish a similar MoU with neighbours. With 67 border-region local government areas, officials described cross-border VL transmission as a pressing risk. “The cost of care is steep, and we bear 25% of the global NTD burden,” said a representative on behalf of Nigeria’s Coordinating Minister of Health. “We cannot address this in isolation.” Tanzania echoed the call for accountability. “We must hold each other accountable, track progress, and adapt strategies,” said its health minister. “There is no more time for words, but we still have time for action.” Beyond coordination, speakers drew attention to persistent barriers: limited domestic financing, weak integration into primary care, and outdated tools. DNDi’s CEO, Dr Luis Pizarro, described current VL treatments as “toxic, painful, and costly,” particularly for rural populations, emphasising that research and development must no longer be viewed as a luxury. “It is not acceptable in 2025 to rely on outdated treatments,” Pizarro said. The Africa CDC urged states to rethink the framing of NTDs. “These are not neglected diseases—they are priority diseases,” said the representative of Dr. Jean Kaseya, Director General, Africa CDC, citing the need to embed NTD strategies in health security planning and push for domestic investment despite fiscal constraints. The meeting closed with ministers endorsing a call to action that commits signatory countries to concrete steps in eliminating VL, including shared data systems, joint planning, and community-based delivery. Nutrition Leaders Sound Alarm on Rising Hunger and Stalled Progress 21/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman From left: Nancy Aburto, Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Moumouni Kinda, Claudia Hudspet, and Lina Mahy GENEVA – Although the past decade has seen progress in the fight against malnutrition, 148 million children remain stunted, 45 million suffer from wasting, and anaemia affects nearly one in three women globally, according to experts at the Geneva Health Forum (GHF). In 2023 alone, 733 million people experienced hunger—152 million more than in 2019—and over 2.8 billion people were unable to afford a healthy diet. The GHF noted that malnutrition also remains a contributing factor in 45% of deaths among children under five. Looking ahead, the global nutrition crisis could worsen. Francesco Branca of the Institute of Global Health at the University of Geneva warned that the number of obese people worldwide is expected to rise from a billion today to 2.3 billion by 2050. “Nutrition has to be where we take action,” he told a room on Tuesday at Campus Biotech, where this year’s GHF side sessions of the 78th World Health Assembly are being held. “Where do we take action?” Branca asked. “It has to be people-centered. So the action has to be where the problem is. The action has to be in the centres where children are presented with malnutrition. The action has to be taken in primary health care offices where doctors find people with obesity. The action has to be where people are suffering from a lack of food, indeed, and that’s, of course, the responsibility of people providing services and people who are making decisions about those services.” The three-hour session brought together global experts from diverse sectors. It was held against the backdrop of a recent decision by WHO member states to extend the Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016-2025) to 2030, aligning it with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It also took place following the 2025 Nutrition for Growth (N4G) Summit in March, where 47 participating states made more than 400 commitments. Speakers highlighted the need for stronger governance and integrated, multisectoral approaches to combat malnutrition. They emphasised bundling services to improve efficiency, implementing regulatory measures such as taxation and food labelling, and exploring innovative financing mechanisms. According to Valerie Bellino, president of the Geneva Global Health Cooperative, the session’s aim was also to position Geneva as a driving force in promoting global nutrition solutions and to help build the long-term momentum needed to meet the 2030 targets. A ‘village’ of solutions Afshan Khan (right), Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Coordinator of the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement Afshan Khan, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Coordinator of the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement, spoke passionately about the importance of the N4G Summit. She highlighted the strong participation of civil society in the summit, describing it as “a whole village of solutions.” Khan emphasised that the event featured a whole day dedicated to showcasing best practices from civil society partners and youth-led discussions about how the intersection of nutrition, health, climate change, and conflict is shaping their lives, now and in the future. She added that there was also a dedicated day of engagement with the private sector. “We have to be able to address all forms of malnutrition and undernutrition with the right kinds of quality nutritious foods available at an affordable price, as well as having foods that are low in trans fat or sugars,” Khan explained. “A really important component is how we influence what people eat, which is influenced by what companies are putting out there on the market.” She reiterated that nutrition is not just a health concern, but a key pillar of economic development. “The Nutrition for Growth Summit helped connect the golden thread of the importance of nutrition for long-term growth and development of children, for the health of women… and also the economic imperative nutrition brings to building human capital,” she said. “There is a real opportunity to emphasise and stress more that an investment in nutrition has a $23 rate of return for each dollar,” Khan added, citing World Bank estimates. “Here we see an opportunity to show the power of nutrition and its ability to transform societies.” Still, while some countries have stepped up, others are pulling back—and the consequences are already unfolding. Khan also warned that ongoing conflicts, climate stress, and budget cuts are combining to put millions of lives at risk. “The situation in Gaza is perhaps one of the most visible and stark, because it’s clearly a man-made crisis—as is Sudan, as is Yemen,” she said. She explained that nutrition programs are often amongst the first to be cut when aid is reduced. For example, more than 600,000 people in Kenya living in drought-stricken areas are expected to lose access to lifesaving food and nutrition services. Similar cuts are taking place in Sudan. According to the Standing Together for Nutrition consortium, a 44% reduction in aid could erase decades of hard-won progress, leaving 2.3 million children without access to essential treatment. Khan warned that as many as 60% of these children may not survive without intervention: “The long-term projections on death due to some of these cuts are stark.” Learning from success A panel discussion during the session highlighted where nutrition efforts yield results, offering practical takeaways that others in the field could adapt to their national contexts. Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Assistant Secretary and executive director of the National Nutrition Council in the Philippines, shared that her country faces a triple burden of malnutrition: undernutrition, overnutrition, and micronutrient deficiencies. To address this, the government launched a multisectoral platform centred on what she called “ABCDY,” where A stands for academia, B for businesses, C for civil society, D for donors, and Y for youth. She explained that these nutrition-focused collaborations are being implemented at all levels, from the federal government to local government units. “What is unique about the Philippines is that we have 7,000 islands—geographically isolated areas where malnutrition is highest,” Milana-Dayanghirang explained. To tackle these challenges, the government rolled out the Philippine Plan of Action for Nutrition (PPAN), a six-year strategy from 2023 to 2028. The plan focusses on three core pillars: promoting healthier diets, fostering improved social behaviours, and strengthening governance. “We develop policies,” Milana-Dayanghirang said. She pointed to one example: the Philippines instituted a sugar-sweetened beverage tax that has effectively reduced consumption, especially amongst teenagers and children. She added that the country is now in the final stages of approving a national nutrient profiling model and food labelling program—tools she hopes will further strengthen the country’s nutrition agenda. From left: Nancy Aburto, Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Moumouni Kinda, Claudia Hudspet, and Lina Mahy In an Africa case study, Moumouni Kinda, director of the Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA), shared that globally the treatment of children for malnutrition has expanded significantly, from treating no children for malnutrition 55 years ago to nearly nine million in 2023. Last year, Alima teams treated 350,000 malnourished children in 13 countries. However, despite this progress, Kinda said his teams receive weekly reports from more than a dozen countries warning of imminent food shortages. Amongst the hardest-hit nations are Niger, Chad, and Nigeria. “The violent shutdown of USAID and funding cuts in the United Kingdom and Europe are worsening an already critical situation,” Kinda warned. “But we have hope.” He explained that that hope lies in the potential to secure more sustainable, local sources of funding. Like the Philippines, Kinda suggested that more African countries could implement a sugar-sweetened beverage tax to help finance nutrition programs. He emphasised that the tax could be modest—”only one cent”—but if adopted by several countries, it could have a significant impact. “If we approach 10 countries, this could be about $1.4 billion annually,” Kinda said, noting that such a sum could help treat millions of children across the continent. The WHO’s Lina Mahy highlighted significant funding imbalances in the global food system. She pointed out that during the COVID-19 pandemic, from 2020 to 2022, the food industry made approximately $1 billion in profit every two days. In that same period, 62 new food billionaires emerged. “We have to put that into perspective,” Mahy said. “We need to talk about – these power imbalances and inequalities and how to address them. WHO is ready to talk about these elephants in the room.” Investing in food systems The Aga Khan Foundation is working to help fill funding and service gaps in the global nutrition space. Claudia Hudspet, the organisation’s global health lead, said the foundation has committed more than $45 million over the next five years to better integrate nutrition into healthcare systems and improve access to affordable, healthy food. One of the foundation’s key programs is the Central Asia Stunting Initiative (CASI), which targets high stunting rates in remote parts of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan. The program is designed to improve maternal and child health outcomes by supporting frontline health workers in assessing and addressing nutritional needs. In partnership with the Aga Khan Health Service and local partners in Pakistan, the foundation helped develop a mobile application for Lady Health Visitors (LHVs) in the Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral regions. The app enables LHVs (health workers that specialise in maternal anc child care) to assess the nutritional status of pregnant women, mothers, and children during household visits and provide targeted nutrition supplements when needed. “The Central Asia Stunting Initiative really looks at integration into health systems,” Hudspet explained. She said a major focus is increasing the number of women giving birth in health facilities and ensuring that newborns are weighed at delivery. “It’s a very simple intervention, but many babies aren’t weighed at birth, and we miss a lot of those low birth weight and small for gestational age babies, and we’re not able to give them the best start in life,” she said. “Identifying growth faltering and catching children before they lose weight or stature… improves our chances of success.” In addition to stunting prevention, the foundation is working to integrate nutrition into early childhood development efforts through the Nurturing Care Framework. Hudspet also emphasised the foundation’s growing interest in food systems, particularly the links between agriculture, climate resilience, and nutrition. One of its flagship programs in this area is the Indian Ocean Coastal Regeneration Initiative (IOCRI), which Hudspet described as supporting sustainable livelihoods in coastal communities while restoring degraded ecosystems. The program aims to rehabilitate 100,000 hectares of coastal lands and strengthen local economies through renewable energy and nature-based solutions. “While this is a climate initiative, initially, we also are integrating nutrition through things like blue foods; aquaculture nutrition champions looking at food supply and social behaviour,” Hudspet said. Because the foundation and Aga Khan University are part of the same network, the foundation can also leverage data to monitor program impact and adapt as needed. “We monitor these programs very intensively, and tweak and learn from them,” she said. Nutrition as a climate health strategy Climate change also added 41 days of dangerous heat in 2024, according to a report jointly produced by the team at World Weather Attribution (WWA) and Climate Central. Nancy Aburto, Deputy Director of the Food and Nutrition Division at the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), said the growing body of data around food insecurity and its consequences offers new opportunities to move from talk to action. “I’m going to start with a statistic that’s not very pretty,” she told the room. “It’s 2.8 billion people worldwide [who] cannot afford a healthy diet.” But Aburto said that knowing this figure—and having tracked it for several years—has pushed researchers and policymakers to seek tangible solutions. One of the clearest, she said, lies in how we spend existing agricultural support. “In 2022, the State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World report documented that worldwide support for food and agriculture was almost $630 billion a year,” she said. When combined with recent true cost accounting from FAO that shows unhealthy diets account for about 70% of the $10 trillion in hidden costs to health systems, the case for repurposing that investment becomes even stronger. “It tells us that we can repurpose that $630 billion a year to something that can help us reduce that $10 trillion cost burden on our health systems,” Aburto explained. “And that is moving us towards solutions for repurposing agricultural investments to diverse, nutritious foods, which can absolutely be monumental.” She added that food systems reform has benefits beyond nutrition. According to Aburto, shifting diets could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the food and agriculture sector by up to 13%. The environmental benefit doesn’t stop there—healthier diets can also help protect forests, water systems, and biodiversity. “This means enabling healthy diets is not just a solution for the nutrition community,” she said. “It’s a solution for the environmental community as well.” Image Credits: Maayan Hoffman, WMO. Next Steps: Tension About How to Settle the Pandemic Agreement’s Annex 21/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Lancet editor Richard Horton (left) moderates a panel with Helen Clark, Precious Matsoso and Raj Panjabi at the Geneva Graduate Institute. There are tensions between World Health Organization (WHO) member states about how to approach the final negotiations on the pandemic agreement – an annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing system (PABS), according to Precious Matsoso, who co-chaired the negotiations. “There’s an argument about whether you invite experts to start working on a technical document and then invite member states to discuss the details and negotiate amongst themselves, or get member states to submit their inputs and discuss and only then would you invite experts,” Matsoso told on event at the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute on Tuesday. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), co-chaired by Matsoso of South Africa and French Global Health Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou, hands the PABS talks to an Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG). The working group is supposed to conclude talks on annex by next year’s WHA and, once adopted, the pandemic agreement will then be open for signature and ratification. Once 60 countries have ratified it, the agreement will enter into force. The IGWG will also begin to set up a Coordinating Financial Mechanism for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and the Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network (GSCL). Helen Clark, co-chair of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, said the IGWG was expected to start work in September. She flagged the 2026 United Nations High-Level Meeting on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response as an opportunity to “push for rapid ratification” – or agreement on the annex if it has not yet been passed. “The message we could send out to countries is: start looking at your national procedures and doing your national tests, and be ready to run on ratification when the annex is actually agreed,” Clark told the Graduate School audience. Clark added that while South Africa, as chair of the G20, was supportive of pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, the US was due to assume the chair in 2026. “Will they take the chair next year, or will it pass to someone else? If they take the chair, what hope is there for any of this? That’s an open question. I’m not a diplomat, so I can put this question on the on the table. If they take the chair, it could be treading water for a year, for with G20,” said Clark, who is a former Prime Minister of New Zealand. Role of EU in talks Speaking shortly after the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary adopted the pandemic agreement, Matsoso said that the “Slovakia drama” raised questions about how regional blocs operated during negotiations. Slovakia, whose Prime Minister Robert Fico is opposed to mRNA vaccines, demanded a vote on the pandemic agreement resolution during a committee discussion on Monday night. The resolution was passed by 124 votes in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. But Matsoso said Slovakia was part of the European Union (EU), which had negotiated as a bloc, so it should have been party to the regional position. Matsoso added that some of the countries that had abstained had explained they “were still going through their own internal processes, and had not been given a mandate to vote” as they had expected the agreement would be adopted by consensus. Dr Raj Panjabi, former White House official under Joe Biden, said there were three things to watch to ensure the pandemic agreement was implemented: independent monitoring and clear accountability; adequate financing, and “increasing regional self reliance”. “Ensuring that financing is stepped up [is] very hard in this moment when overseas development assistance is being pulled back, not just by my country, the United States, but by several others,” said Panjabi. “The WHO is more strained than ever, and that’s why ensuring that assessed contributions are increased is going to be critical, as is harmonising and leveraging other funds in the system,” said Panjabi. Regional self-reliance Panjabi defined regional self reliance as “an entire end-to-end focus, from research and development, investment and innovation to enhancing manufacturing and ensuring that the delivery of counter-measures in the next pandemic occurs,” said Panjabi. Swedish global health expert Anders Nordström (left) moderates a panel with Diah Saminarsih, Eloise Todd, Michel Kazatchkine and Mariangelo Simao. However, Brazil’s deputy minister of health, Mariângela Simão, warned that, while there is a G20 coalition on local and regional production, “there’s so much that you can do at country level”. “Research and Development is one of the things that I’m more worried about – the capacity to copy what’s already developed and make safe and quality-assured products. We don’t need reinventing the wheel everywhere. We need to recognise what are global public goods and then make sure they are available at country level… you can’t have everyone producing everything.” UNAIDS special adviser Michel Kazatchkine said that he could not see a world “that is just a juxtaposition of regions without any glue, without any coordination, without any compass”. This, he added, is the role of the WHO, providing “vaccine blueprints, pre-qualification, its normative role”. In the future, global health “will not look like a top-down construction that it has been with money flowing from Geneva to various places”, Kazatchkine stressed. “The international money will be there to complement the national and the regional efforts, because global health is also about global solidarity.” But Eloise Todd, who leads the Pandemic Action Network (PAN), noted that one of the biggest learnings from the COVID pandemic is “definitely no country, and certainly no region that can do it all themselves”. “We’re in a very uncomfortable place in which we know that there are modernisations and ways in which we need to reform to support the regionalisation agenda and the country agenda, but we certainly shouldn’t be doing it at the pace and with the disregard being done at present. “We’re in this tension between the excellent work that some global entities do to fill a gap. And so what do you do about that? You can’t cut it away and risk lives, but we have to have, like, a 10 ,15, 20-year conversation about powering that down and getting towards proper national and regional level intersectionality.” Nations Approve WHO Membership Fee Increase as US Exit Squeezes Budget 20/05/2025 Stefan Anderson Delegates gathered on Tuesday at the World Health Assembly agreed a new WHO budget for the 2026–2027 period which included a rise in membership fees. Photo WHO/Pierre Albouy. Nations at the 78th World Health Assembly approved a new budget and a 20% increase in annual membership fees for the World Health Organisation (WHO), handing the embattled UN health agency a crucial lifeline as it grapples with the financial bomb dropped on Geneva by the United States’ withdrawal from international institutions. The vote marks the second consecutive 20% hike in membership dues in as many budgets, which the agency’s member states approve on a biennial basis, the last coming in 2024. The move is part of a long-term plan to boost mandatory contributions from 16% of WHO’s core budget at the start of the decade to 50% by 2030 to reduce its dependence on the whims of major donors like the now-departed US. These membership fees provide the organization with flexible funding it can allocate according to its own priorities, unlike the voluntary contributions that typically come strictly earmarked by donors for specific programmes that have historically made up the vast majority of the WHO’s budget. Under the new budget, assessed contributions will make up 40% of the WHO’s base program budget of $4.2 billion for the 2026-27 period. The core budget does not include emergency humanitarian appeals or polio programmes, which bring the total budget target up to $6.2 billion. The fee increase, initially mandated in a 2022 resolution at the WHO’s executive assembly, faced an uncertain path to approval on Tuesday, with member nations engaging in tense pre-vote debates over the fairness of regional funding cuts in the new budget – which will run for two years starting in 2026 – and demands for greater transparency in expenditure tracking. Projected financing for the base programmes segment of the budget for 2026–2027, compared to previous bienniums, in US$ million. A battle of buzzwords played out during the proceedings: supporters of the fee increase championed “flexible, predictable, sustainable and agile” funding, while skeptics countered with demands for “efficiency,” “transparency,” elimination of “redundancy” and “cost-effectiveness” – signaling clearly that the WHO’s financial reprieve comes with strings and expectations attached. WHO officials had acknowledged in the budget document they were “cognizant that such an increase will not be automatically granted” amid overlapping global crises straining national budgets worldwide. In the end, a collective recognition of the existential financial threat facing the agency carried the budget over the line. The chamber fell silent during the vote, with no objections raised. “There is a crisis,” WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared following the vote. “But we will use this crisis as an opportunity and make sure our organisation emerges sharper and more empowered.” Germany’s delegation, the WHO’s most important financial backer since the American departure, hailed the decision as “historic” — but not before voicing their support in song. “I tell you what I want, what I really, really want,” the German representative sang in an awkward rendition of the Spice Girls hit befitting the oft-lively proceedings of Committee A, “and that is that we all indeed are serious about functioning and effective multilateralism.” “The increase is the best vaccination against the highest financial risk that WHO faces,” he added, “its dependency on a very few donors, and the discrepancy between the expectations we all put on the organisation and its ability to fulfil them.” Financial triage Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. The agency has been in financial triage mode since the US exit announcement in November, implementing drastic budget reductions to secure votes that earned praise from member states for its “budgetary realism.” Before the US departure, the 2026-27 budget required to fulfill WHO’s core mission was projected at $5.3 billion over the two year period. Following Tuesday’s vote, the target plummeted to $4.2 billion, a 22% cut that will impact the agency’s operations worldwide. The revised budget represents a $700 million decrease from projections presented at WHO’s January executive board meeting, but even this diminished figure approved in Geneva remains aspirational. Level of projected financing for the base programmes segment of the Proposed programme budget 2026–2027, US$ million. While WHO secured an additional $170 million toward its 2026-27 budget Tuesday evening following major commitments of $50 million a year from China and first-time donors Mongolia and Cambodia, among others, the agency still faces a $1.5 billion funding shortfall on top of the $1.1 billion decrease from previous budget projections. The two new donor nations join 42 additional first-time voluntary contributors to WHO, including seven low-income and 28 lower-middle and upper-middle income countries. “With the exception of the headquarters and the European region, the allocated or proposed budget for every regional office is currently higher, even after the reduction, than the projected implementation,” explained Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. Without additional contributions, further life-threatening program cuts loom. All of the WHO’s six regions face significant cuts heading into the 2026-27 period covered by the budget. Regional office budgets are set to fall by 14%, with the African region facing the largest total cut of $153 million year-on-year. The agency’s Geneva headquarters will lose nearly a quarter of its annual funding. China announced it will contribute $500 million to the WHO over the next five-year period, though it was unclear whether this includes the 20% increase in its fee contributions. This will make China, for the first time, the largest fee payer in the WHO, supplanting the US as it exits. “We can only implement the budget if we have the financing,” Hollo said, noting the “personal sacrifice” that member states will need to make should the funding target remain unmet. More freedom, less money WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Raul Thomas, the Assistant Director-General for Business Operations at WHO address the committee following the successful vote. The WHO’s budget victory comes amid a zero-sum competition for international aid dollars, with UN agencies and humanitarian organisations worldwide scrambling to fill gaps left by America’s retreat from global commitments. Since January, the White House has systematically dismantled the US Agency for International Development (USAID) – historically the world’s largest humanitarian donor – while slashing support for the United Nations and WHO’s sister agencies. By March, over 80% of USAID programs had been shuttered, punching a $60 billion hole in global aid budgets. This broader retreat from international commitments has left organisations like the UN Refugee Agency and Office for Humanitarian Affairs and non-governental humanitarian organisations scrambling for resources just as the WHO does the same, creating unprecedented competition for a dwindling pool of donor funds that no single government appears willing or able to replenish. In the latest sign of distress, top UN officials told staff at a town hall in New York City Tuesday that the organization is considering a 20% reduction across every secretariat under the UN umbrella for 2026 — from humanitarian affairs, to human rights, peacekeeping operations, and development programs — heightening the financial crisis in the world of international institutions and those who depend on them. Several major financial contributors to WHO, including Germany, France, and the EU delegation, pressed the agency to develop contingency plans for potential fundraising shortfalls as the UN system creaks under the weight of the US withdrawal. “Should the resources, the $1.65 billion, not materialise, the idea is that we will be in a position to actually scale back or ramp up,” said Raul Thomas, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for business operations who led the budget consultations with member states. “We never know – I’m the eternal optimist. Maybe we’ll get much more money than the 1.65 million. That’s the gap right now.” Presidents and Prime Ministers Celebrate the Passing of the Pandemic Agreement 20/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan WHO officials including the co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso (right) celebrate the World Health Assembly’s adoption of the pandemic agreement. Presidents, prime ministers and even opera singers, celebrated the unanimous adoption of the world’s first Pandemic Agreement by consensus at the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary on Tuesday morning. Despite the 11th-hour insistence of Slovakia on a vote on the agreement in Committee A on Monday night, none of the World Health Organization (WHO) member states obstructed the agreement’s adoption at the plenary. Instead, it was presented as a rare example of successful multilateral engagement in a world of heightened conflict. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço commended the WHO’s resilience in the face of “unfair and unjust criticism”, and pledged an additional $8 million from his country to the WHO. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço Speaking on behalf of the 55 AU member states, Lourenço said the continent is “united in supporting the proposal to increase assessed contributions” [membership fees] as “the WHO is the only institution with a universal mandate to protect global health and promote equity”. China’s Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong pledged an “additional quota of $500 million over five years” to the WHO, at the plenary, and urged all countries to “support the WHO to play a central coordinating role in global health governance” and enable it “to perform its duty in an independent, professional and science-based manner”. Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, also in the room, described the WHO as “a beacon of hope and a guardian of humanity’s right to health”. Plenković described sustainable financing of the WHO as “a strategic imperative” to enable “timely responses to emergencies and meaningful support where it is needed most”. Egyptian opera singer Farrah El-Dibany and soprano singers Elaine Vidal and Eunice Miller of the Philippines also performed for the assembly. Macron appeals to US scientists Emmanuel Macron addresses the WHA plenary in a recorded message. “Our first line of defence is the WHO,” said French President Emmanuel Macron in a recorded message. He then appealed to “all those researchers who want to freely continue to do their work” – a veiled reference to US scientists dismissed during US President Donald Trump’s massive budget cuts – to move to Europe. “We will be happy to welcome you in Europe, because that will be good for Europe, for medical research, for you and for everyone. It’s not a question of ‘if’ we will have a new pandemic. It’s a question of ‘when’ we’ll have it,” said Macron. South African and G20 President Cyril Ramaphosa, and the leaders of the Philippines, Peru, Mongolia and Senegal also sent recorded messages of support. The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a coherent global health architecture and described the pandemic agreement as “historic”. As one leader after another defended the WHO and multilateralism, Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO loomed as the elephant in the room – and the target of unspoken rebuke. So it was timely – but also surprising – that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr also sent a recorded message to the plenary. Unlike the other messages, however, Kennedy claimed that the WHO “has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest and international power politics”. “The WHO has not even come to terms with its failures during COVID, let alone made significant reforms. Instead, it has doubled down with the pandemic agreement, which will lock in all of the dysfunctions of the WHO pandemic response,” he added, without articulating any specific US objections to the agreement. ‘Eyes on the prize’ Namibian Health Minister and chair of Committee A, Dr Esperance Luvindao, Dr Tedros and Dr Mike Ryan applauding the vote on the pandemic agreement in Committee A on Monday night. Addressing the plenary after the leaders’ messages, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus paid tribute to those who negotiated the pandemic agreement. “You have engaged in very tough negotiations. Sometimes the disagreements were sharp, the discussions heated and the frustration evident. Sometimes it seemed the distance between you might be too great to overcome. But you kept your eyes on the prize, and did not stop until you had achieved it,” said Tedros, adding that sometimes delegates had talked all night in the windowless basement room of the WHO headquarters where the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) met. “The pandemic agreement has been negotiated by countries for countries, and will be implemented in countries in accordance with their own national laws,” stressed Tedros, referring to the “torrent of mis- and disinformation” that claimed the agreement will “infringe on national sovereignty” and give the WHO Secretariat “power to impose mask or vaccine mandates or lockdowns. “Today, you have sent a loud message that multilateralism not only works, but is the only way to find shared solutions to shared threats. Let’s not understate what you have achieved. You have made the world a safer place,” stressed Tedros. Pathogens ‘won’t wait’ The agreement was welcomed by the co-chairs of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, former President of Liberia, and Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand. “Consider this agreement a foundation from which to build, starting today,” said Clark. “Many gaps remain in finance, equitable access to medical countermeasures and in understanding evolving risks. Don’t wait to get started. Dangerous pathogens are looming, and they certainly will not wait. The Third World Network said that the “next phases of negotiations, beginning with the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), will determine whether this agreement becomes a meaningful tool for equity or if it remains merely symbolic”. “At stake is the ability of developing countries to access affordable vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics swiftly and fairly during health emergencies and to realize the ambition of a fairer and more effective global health architecture that can equitably prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics,” said TWN. Dr David Reddy, director-general of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), said that, as the next level of detail of the agreement is worked through, it is essential that the experience of pharmaceutical companies is drawn upon “so that their expertise can be mobilized when needed”. This includes how the PABS will work “where we must make sure that companies are able to access the pathogens and sequence information as quickly as possible to undertake scientific research and avoid unnecessary conditions that make it harder for companies to do so”, Reddy stressed. He added that “intellectual property protections that are essential for pharmaceutical companies to invest in high-risk R&D, must not be eroded and instead should enable partnerships on voluntary and mutually agreed terms, in a way that draws on the expertise and networks of each company.” ‘US is not indispensible’ Public Citizen Access to Medicines Director Peter Maybarduk said that “WHO member states chose health and justice today, despite RFK’s cheap insult, the reckless US withdrawal and Trump’s deadly neglect of infectious disease threats. “The world moved forward without the US today. Trump’s devastating cuts cast a shadow on the talks, and are on course to cost millions of lives, including the lives of Americans made more vulnerable to infectious disease,” said Maybarduk. “Still, countries came together amidst scarcity to commit themselves to a more just and healthy world, and that is worth celebrating.” Matthew Kavanagh, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Global Health Policy and Politics, said that the US “did not show up for the final negotiations but it turns out the US is not indispensable and, in fact, perhaps not having the US engaged is what enabled more cooperation.” “With the current administration seemingly intent on dismantling global public health efforts, it may be the best case scenario if the rest of the world can come together. In that way, this new agreement is a spot of light in and otherwise dark geopolitical environment for fighting pandemics,” Kavanagh told Health Policy Watch. Image Credits: WHO. Can Technology Tame the NCD Crisis? Experts Call for Smarter, Inclusive Digital Health Solutions 20/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman Digital blood pressure monitoring devices have now become widely available The pace of technological change today is nothing short of revolutionary, according to Dr Douglas Bettcher, Senior Advisor in the Director-General’s Office at the World Health Organization (WHO). “I think we find ourselves very strangely in the last couple of years, in what seems to be a really brave new world, brave new reality,” he told attendees at Monday’s Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF) event, which focused on how digital innovations could help prevent and manage noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). “A case can be made that this communications revolution is even greater and more mind-boggling than what we’ve seen in the past,” Bettcher continued. “Even some pundits in the know compare this to the 19th-century industrial revolution. And what must be clear to us, being confronted with these very, very rapid changes, is that we in the public health community cannot be left standing during this digital innovation, this mass revolution.” Bettcher, who discussed WHO’s Be He@lthy, Be Mobile (BHBM) program, stressed that the train has already left the station. Industries that harm health are already leveraging artificial intelligence and related technologies. Now, he said, it’s time for those working to improve health to use them too. The Monday event—hosted as a side event of the 78th World Health Assembly—was a collaboration between GSCF, WHO, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Titled “Empowering Self-Care: Digital Innovations for NCD Prevention and Management,” it highlighted the vital role of self-care and digital technology in tackling NCDs, emphasizing cross-sector collaboration. Keynote addresses were given by H.E. Honourable Tuafafa Latasi, a member of the Tuvalu parliament, and Dr Dympna Kavanagh, the Chief Dental Officer of Ireland’s Department of Health. “Digital innovation has the power to transform healthcare and how we look after ourselves,” said moderator Shiulie Ghosh. “That is the role of digital innovation in preventing and managing some of the biggest causes of death across the globe.” She emphasized that digital tools can improve access to self-care and empower individuals living with NCDs to monitor and manage their conditions effectively. GSCF Director-General Greg Perry added, “We are at a pivotal moment in NCDs,” referring to WHO’s release last week of the zero draft of the political declaration on NCDs and mental health. The draft was published in preparation for the upcoming High-Level Meeting on September 25. Greg Perry (center) The declaration outlines proposed global targets for 2030: 150 million fewer people using tobacco 150 million more people managing their hypertension 150 million more people gaining access to mental health care The 10-page draft includes a set of five sub-targets, offering a roadmap for reaching these ambitious goals. “Digital tools can play a very, very important part,” Perry told the audience. “When we talk about self-care, we’re not just about keeping fit, eating correctly, or even brushing our teeth. We’re talking about the necessary tools for people to self-care.” These tools may include medicines and digital applications from the industry’s perspective. “If you add AI and digital applications together with the current and future self-care tools that are available and will be available, we are on the verge of almost a self-care revolution,” Perry said. “These [tools] will be accessible, they’ll be self-managed, and they will have a very high impact.” Making digital self-care tools useful and trusted One key challenge with emerging digital self-care tools is the lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into people’s daily lives. Luis Lourenço of the International Pharmaceutical Federation noted that pharmacists are often the first point of contact when individuals seek advice or support related to digital tools. “When you talk about the impact of digital tools on primary health care, you can focus on four major areas: prevention, health literacy, diagnosis, and the management of a chronic disease,” Lourenço said. He added that health literacy is often one of the most complicated aspects. While having access to information is essential, Lourenço emphasized that it’s not enough. People also need to understand the information and apply it in their routines. “What’s the point of having information about your blood pressure if you don’t understand what it means or when to incorporate it?” he asked. “What we have today is a lot of access to information, but people rely a lot, mostly on their healthcare partners, healthcare professionals, and pharmacists.” Without that support, he said, people may have information but not know how to use it effectively. Lourenço also pointed out that people want to be sure the tools they use are evidence-based and trustworthy. However, Debbie Rogers, CEO of Reach Digital Health, offered a slightly different perspective, suggesting that if digital tools provide enough value, people will ultimately trust them. Addressing accessibility, accountability, and inclusion Another key challenge is user hesitation, particularly among specific populations, about whether they want to use digital tools at all. “On one hand, we have developed countries. We have higher literacy levels. We have digital-savvy sort of people,” explained Hussain Jafri of the World Patient Alliance. “They are using [digital tools] and giving us very good results. But then you look at the other populations—at the lower- and middle-income countries and the elderly population, the people who are not tech-savvy. They are not really using them.” Jafri shared that he once downloaded an app designed for people with pre-diabetes but found it too complicated and deleted it after only a few days. Experts said encouraging adoption also depends on better integration of these tools into healthcare systems, where people feel accountable for the data they enter. Lourenço noted that if patients knew their doctors were reviewing the data collected in an app, it would likely motivate them to use the tool more consistently. Jafri stressed that companies developing digital health technologies must involve users, patients, and providers early in the design process, rather than waiting until products are already on the market. “I think they also need to take into account our input—the input of the people who are going to use [the tools] should also be there while they’re developing these products, so that, you know, once it is out there, people are happy using it,” he said. Language accessibility is another barrier. Jafri emphasized the importance of localization. “These [tools] need to be in multiple languages, not just English,” he said, adding that companies should also provide training for providers and patients to ensure successful adoption. Empowering mothers through technology: South African case study A pregnant woman in Africa (illustrative) There are already promising examples of how digital health tools are making a difference, as illustrated by Rogers of Reach Digital Health. She shared a case from South Africa, where hypertension during pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. “We have a program called MomConnect, where every mother who comes into the clinic can sign up to receive messaging throughout her pregnancy and until her baby is two years old,” Rogers explained. The mothers receive both information and behavior-change tips. They can also ask questions and provide feedback to the system. Because hypertension is such a critical issue, the National Department of Health wanted to better understand the root causes. They started by asking mothers about their experience during their first antenatal visit: Did they have their blood pressure taken? Were they told what the results were? If so, were they prescribed the appropriate medication? “It was important to understand that patient journey, understand where the challenges were, and to do this at a national scale,” Rogers said. Based on the insights gathered, the department introduced targeted training for healthcare workers. This effort helped drive increased demand for quality care from the patients themselves. “We got mothers to go back to their clinic and say, ‘You didn’t take my blood pressure last time. I want you to take my blood pressure,’ or ‘you didn’t put me on the right medication.'” Rogers concluded that this initiative “shows the power of being able to empower people, both with information and behavior change, communication knowledge, so they knew what they had to ask for and what they were looking out for.” Carl Massonneau, Technical Officer for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research for the WHO, speaking from the audience, explained that another tool recently released by the World Health Organization is the Digital Adaptation Kit for Antenatal Care. The kit translates WHO recommendations into machine-readable formats, making integrating them into digital health systems easier. Carl Massonneau of the WHO One specific feature of the kit is a tool for self-monitoring blood pressure among pregnant women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders. That tool will be released next week. “It’s the first time we’re putting a step in this world and trying to provide standards to improve the quality of digital health interventions we have,” Massonneau said. He acknowledged that although a growing number of digital technologies are available, there are still major challenges in ensuring they are evidence-based, equitable, and accessible. Integrating Digital Tools Into Broader NCD Strategies As the conversation around digital health tools evolves, experts caution that no single solution will address the full complexity of noncommunicable diseases. Lourenço noted that while some aspects of NCDs fall under primary prevention, where individuals can be empowered to make healthier choices, others require more structured support. He said that strategic outreach, including digital media, can help move people from “pre-contemplation to contemplation,” encouraging them to recognize risks, develop motivation, and ultimately commit to change. However, he emphasized that many behaviors tied to NCDs cannot be addressed through self-care alone. These require ongoing guidance and system-level support. Effective management, Lourenço said, demands full integration within a broader framework—” at the policy level, at the health system level, [and] at the community level.” In this context, digital innovation is not a silver bullet but a key part of a larger ecosystem—one that must be built with intentional design, inclusive access, and cross-sector collaboration to truly transform outcomes in global health. Image Credits: Marco Verch/Flickr , Provided by Global Self-Care Foundation, Elizabeth Poll/MMV, Elaine Fletcher. Country After Country Endorse Pandemic Agreement in Enormous Show of Support 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Countries indicating their wish to speak about the pandemic agreement in Committee A An enormous list of World Health Organization (WHO) member states, 173 in all, lined up to speak in favour of the pandemic agreement at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on Monday – an extraordinary demonstration of the breadth of support for the document. By the end yesterday’s meeting of Committee A, member states passed the pandemic agreement resolution by vote not consensus – at the insistence of Slovakia – with 124 in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. The WHA plenary is due to consider the resolution on Tuesday. But between the cheers were reminders that the talks are not yet done. An annex still needs to be negotiated to establish the mechanisms for a pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) system – the most controversial aspect of the three-year talks. The PABS system will develop a mechanism for how countries that share information about pathogens with pandemic potential may benefit if pharmaceutical products are developed as a result. “As a country that has shared its pathogens, often without equitable returns, the PABS system is paramount in rectifying these imbalances and ensuring the realisation of genuine equity and equitable access,” said South African Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, speaking for the Africa region in Committee A, where the document was being discussed. The Africa region sees the target of 20% of pandemic products being reserved for the WHO for distribution to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by manufacturers participating in PABS, with at least 10% as a donation, during future pandemics, as a “positive first step”, added Motsoaledi. Speaker after speaker urged countries to maintain their political commitment to the PABS negotiations and reach an agreement on the annex before next year’s WHA. Even Hungary, a staunch ally of United States President Donald Trump, welcomed the agreement – and stressed that it did not infringe on countries’ sovereignty, a key claim of disinformation about the pandemic. Trump distanced the US from the pandemic agreement at the outset of his presidency in January, and many of his MAGA supporters claim it is a “power grab” by the WHO. Iran and Paraguay said they could not support the current pandemic agreement draft – reserving support until after the PABS negotiations. Meanwhile, Slovakia, which is led by Prime Minister Robert Fico who has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccines, demanded that the agreement be put to a vote during the committee session. Delegates at WHA’s Committee A after it adopted the pandemic agreeemnt by vote First ‘One Health’ agreement Germany said it “would have welcomed stronger provisions, particularly regarding prevention,” but “recognise this agreement as a critical and timely step toward global solidarity and multilateralism”. “We urge all member states to engage in the upcoming annex negotiations with the same political will and unity that have brought us this far. Let us continue to invest in international cooperation and global solidarity, not only to protect our citizens, but also to lay the groundwork that future generations can benefit from,” said Germany. Switzerland, which has sought to protect its pharmaceutical sector during talks, said it supports “a pragmatic, voluntary approach within existing frameworks, that take into account the advice and contributions from experts”. The European Union said that the agreement “marks an important accomplishment for global health security and cooperation” and “can bolster country capacities to prevent and prepare for pandemics using the One Health approach”. Ireland added that “the commitment to [pandemic] prevention through a One Health approach is the first of its kind to recognise the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health in our response to emerging health trends”. “The establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network and a pathogen access and benefit sharing system will ensure that the response to future health threats will be faster, more effective and more equitable,” it added. China said the agreement “will contribute to the fair distribution of health products, relevant technologies and resources to help developing countries enhance their capacities for prevention, preparedness and response” – but that it needed “some follow-up mechanisms, as well as sustained investment and capacity building efforts from all countries” to be effective. Kazakhstan said that “this is not just a global legal document. It is our collective response to a future where everybody will be protected, regardless of their economic position or status. We must underscore that the success outcome will be defined not only by its content, but also by its ability the state’s ability to implement it.” Jamaica, speaking for 22 countries in the Americas and Caribbean (excluding the USA), said the region was ready to do the work to finish the pandemic agreement. “We remember too vividly the oxygen shortages, the overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare workers, and over seven million lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jamaica. “For the Americas, this agreement means stronger commitments to regional manufacturing capacity, coordinated surveillance, research and development and transfer of technology, especially for developing countries.” ‘The worst of times’ INB co-chairs Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso Co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), South Africa’s Precious Matsoso and French Ambassador for Global Health Anne-Claire Amprou, also addressed the session, expressing appreciation to member states for their commitment. Matsoso reminded the WHA that the special assembly called to establish the INB was convened “at a time when we all wore masks, we practised social distancing, and we had face-to-face meetings that were highly restricted”. “It was the worst of times, the season of despair, of tragic losses, immeasurable devastation – all associated with COVID-19,” said Matsoso. She praised delegates for working through “13 formal rounds of negotiations, many of them extended, producing various iterations of draft pandemic agreement and proposals that have culminated into what we have before us as a consensus draft”. Amprou, who took over as co-chair from Roland Driece of the Netherlands in July 2024, said that the process involved “three years of dialogue, of compromise, of debates, of sleepless nights, but above all, three years guided by a common conviction that health is a common good”. “The COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for us all. It was a brutal reminder of the fact that viruses know no borders. No country, however powerful, can address a global health crisis on its own,” said Amprou. Meanwhile, former co-chair Driece spoke for the Netherlands, expressed his appreciation that the long process had resulted in an agreement. Image Credits: WHO. Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Nutrition Leaders Sound Alarm on Rising Hunger and Stalled Progress 21/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman From left: Nancy Aburto, Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Moumouni Kinda, Claudia Hudspet, and Lina Mahy GENEVA – Although the past decade has seen progress in the fight against malnutrition, 148 million children remain stunted, 45 million suffer from wasting, and anaemia affects nearly one in three women globally, according to experts at the Geneva Health Forum (GHF). In 2023 alone, 733 million people experienced hunger—152 million more than in 2019—and over 2.8 billion people were unable to afford a healthy diet. The GHF noted that malnutrition also remains a contributing factor in 45% of deaths among children under five. Looking ahead, the global nutrition crisis could worsen. Francesco Branca of the Institute of Global Health at the University of Geneva warned that the number of obese people worldwide is expected to rise from a billion today to 2.3 billion by 2050. “Nutrition has to be where we take action,” he told a room on Tuesday at Campus Biotech, where this year’s GHF side sessions of the 78th World Health Assembly are being held. “Where do we take action?” Branca asked. “It has to be people-centered. So the action has to be where the problem is. The action has to be in the centres where children are presented with malnutrition. The action has to be taken in primary health care offices where doctors find people with obesity. The action has to be where people are suffering from a lack of food, indeed, and that’s, of course, the responsibility of people providing services and people who are making decisions about those services.” The three-hour session brought together global experts from diverse sectors. It was held against the backdrop of a recent decision by WHO member states to extend the Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016-2025) to 2030, aligning it with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It also took place following the 2025 Nutrition for Growth (N4G) Summit in March, where 47 participating states made more than 400 commitments. Speakers highlighted the need for stronger governance and integrated, multisectoral approaches to combat malnutrition. They emphasised bundling services to improve efficiency, implementing regulatory measures such as taxation and food labelling, and exploring innovative financing mechanisms. According to Valerie Bellino, president of the Geneva Global Health Cooperative, the session’s aim was also to position Geneva as a driving force in promoting global nutrition solutions and to help build the long-term momentum needed to meet the 2030 targets. A ‘village’ of solutions Afshan Khan (right), Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Coordinator of the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement Afshan Khan, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Coordinator of the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement, spoke passionately about the importance of the N4G Summit. She highlighted the strong participation of civil society in the summit, describing it as “a whole village of solutions.” Khan emphasised that the event featured a whole day dedicated to showcasing best practices from civil society partners and youth-led discussions about how the intersection of nutrition, health, climate change, and conflict is shaping their lives, now and in the future. She added that there was also a dedicated day of engagement with the private sector. “We have to be able to address all forms of malnutrition and undernutrition with the right kinds of quality nutritious foods available at an affordable price, as well as having foods that are low in trans fat or sugars,” Khan explained. “A really important component is how we influence what people eat, which is influenced by what companies are putting out there on the market.” She reiterated that nutrition is not just a health concern, but a key pillar of economic development. “The Nutrition for Growth Summit helped connect the golden thread of the importance of nutrition for long-term growth and development of children, for the health of women… and also the economic imperative nutrition brings to building human capital,” she said. “There is a real opportunity to emphasise and stress more that an investment in nutrition has a $23 rate of return for each dollar,” Khan added, citing World Bank estimates. “Here we see an opportunity to show the power of nutrition and its ability to transform societies.” Still, while some countries have stepped up, others are pulling back—and the consequences are already unfolding. Khan also warned that ongoing conflicts, climate stress, and budget cuts are combining to put millions of lives at risk. “The situation in Gaza is perhaps one of the most visible and stark, because it’s clearly a man-made crisis—as is Sudan, as is Yemen,” she said. She explained that nutrition programs are often amongst the first to be cut when aid is reduced. For example, more than 600,000 people in Kenya living in drought-stricken areas are expected to lose access to lifesaving food and nutrition services. Similar cuts are taking place in Sudan. According to the Standing Together for Nutrition consortium, a 44% reduction in aid could erase decades of hard-won progress, leaving 2.3 million children without access to essential treatment. Khan warned that as many as 60% of these children may not survive without intervention: “The long-term projections on death due to some of these cuts are stark.” Learning from success A panel discussion during the session highlighted where nutrition efforts yield results, offering practical takeaways that others in the field could adapt to their national contexts. Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Assistant Secretary and executive director of the National Nutrition Council in the Philippines, shared that her country faces a triple burden of malnutrition: undernutrition, overnutrition, and micronutrient deficiencies. To address this, the government launched a multisectoral platform centred on what she called “ABCDY,” where A stands for academia, B for businesses, C for civil society, D for donors, and Y for youth. She explained that these nutrition-focused collaborations are being implemented at all levels, from the federal government to local government units. “What is unique about the Philippines is that we have 7,000 islands—geographically isolated areas where malnutrition is highest,” Milana-Dayanghirang explained. To tackle these challenges, the government rolled out the Philippine Plan of Action for Nutrition (PPAN), a six-year strategy from 2023 to 2028. The plan focusses on three core pillars: promoting healthier diets, fostering improved social behaviours, and strengthening governance. “We develop policies,” Milana-Dayanghirang said. She pointed to one example: the Philippines instituted a sugar-sweetened beverage tax that has effectively reduced consumption, especially amongst teenagers and children. She added that the country is now in the final stages of approving a national nutrient profiling model and food labelling program—tools she hopes will further strengthen the country’s nutrition agenda. From left: Nancy Aburto, Azucena Milana-Dayanghirang, Moumouni Kinda, Claudia Hudspet, and Lina Mahy In an Africa case study, Moumouni Kinda, director of the Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA), shared that globally the treatment of children for malnutrition has expanded significantly, from treating no children for malnutrition 55 years ago to nearly nine million in 2023. Last year, Alima teams treated 350,000 malnourished children in 13 countries. However, despite this progress, Kinda said his teams receive weekly reports from more than a dozen countries warning of imminent food shortages. Amongst the hardest-hit nations are Niger, Chad, and Nigeria. “The violent shutdown of USAID and funding cuts in the United Kingdom and Europe are worsening an already critical situation,” Kinda warned. “But we have hope.” He explained that that hope lies in the potential to secure more sustainable, local sources of funding. Like the Philippines, Kinda suggested that more African countries could implement a sugar-sweetened beverage tax to help finance nutrition programs. He emphasised that the tax could be modest—”only one cent”—but if adopted by several countries, it could have a significant impact. “If we approach 10 countries, this could be about $1.4 billion annually,” Kinda said, noting that such a sum could help treat millions of children across the continent. The WHO’s Lina Mahy highlighted significant funding imbalances in the global food system. She pointed out that during the COVID-19 pandemic, from 2020 to 2022, the food industry made approximately $1 billion in profit every two days. In that same period, 62 new food billionaires emerged. “We have to put that into perspective,” Mahy said. “We need to talk about – these power imbalances and inequalities and how to address them. WHO is ready to talk about these elephants in the room.” Investing in food systems The Aga Khan Foundation is working to help fill funding and service gaps in the global nutrition space. Claudia Hudspet, the organisation’s global health lead, said the foundation has committed more than $45 million over the next five years to better integrate nutrition into healthcare systems and improve access to affordable, healthy food. One of the foundation’s key programs is the Central Asia Stunting Initiative (CASI), which targets high stunting rates in remote parts of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan. The program is designed to improve maternal and child health outcomes by supporting frontline health workers in assessing and addressing nutritional needs. In partnership with the Aga Khan Health Service and local partners in Pakistan, the foundation helped develop a mobile application for Lady Health Visitors (LHVs) in the Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral regions. The app enables LHVs (health workers that specialise in maternal anc child care) to assess the nutritional status of pregnant women, mothers, and children during household visits and provide targeted nutrition supplements when needed. “The Central Asia Stunting Initiative really looks at integration into health systems,” Hudspet explained. She said a major focus is increasing the number of women giving birth in health facilities and ensuring that newborns are weighed at delivery. “It’s a very simple intervention, but many babies aren’t weighed at birth, and we miss a lot of those low birth weight and small for gestational age babies, and we’re not able to give them the best start in life,” she said. “Identifying growth faltering and catching children before they lose weight or stature… improves our chances of success.” In addition to stunting prevention, the foundation is working to integrate nutrition into early childhood development efforts through the Nurturing Care Framework. Hudspet also emphasised the foundation’s growing interest in food systems, particularly the links between agriculture, climate resilience, and nutrition. One of its flagship programs in this area is the Indian Ocean Coastal Regeneration Initiative (IOCRI), which Hudspet described as supporting sustainable livelihoods in coastal communities while restoring degraded ecosystems. The program aims to rehabilitate 100,000 hectares of coastal lands and strengthen local economies through renewable energy and nature-based solutions. “While this is a climate initiative, initially, we also are integrating nutrition through things like blue foods; aquaculture nutrition champions looking at food supply and social behaviour,” Hudspet said. Because the foundation and Aga Khan University are part of the same network, the foundation can also leverage data to monitor program impact and adapt as needed. “We monitor these programs very intensively, and tweak and learn from them,” she said. Nutrition as a climate health strategy Climate change also added 41 days of dangerous heat in 2024, according to a report jointly produced by the team at World Weather Attribution (WWA) and Climate Central. Nancy Aburto, Deputy Director of the Food and Nutrition Division at the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), said the growing body of data around food insecurity and its consequences offers new opportunities to move from talk to action. “I’m going to start with a statistic that’s not very pretty,” she told the room. “It’s 2.8 billion people worldwide [who] cannot afford a healthy diet.” But Aburto said that knowing this figure—and having tracked it for several years—has pushed researchers and policymakers to seek tangible solutions. One of the clearest, she said, lies in how we spend existing agricultural support. “In 2022, the State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World report documented that worldwide support for food and agriculture was almost $630 billion a year,” she said. When combined with recent true cost accounting from FAO that shows unhealthy diets account for about 70% of the $10 trillion in hidden costs to health systems, the case for repurposing that investment becomes even stronger. “It tells us that we can repurpose that $630 billion a year to something that can help us reduce that $10 trillion cost burden on our health systems,” Aburto explained. “And that is moving us towards solutions for repurposing agricultural investments to diverse, nutritious foods, which can absolutely be monumental.” She added that food systems reform has benefits beyond nutrition. According to Aburto, shifting diets could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the food and agriculture sector by up to 13%. The environmental benefit doesn’t stop there—healthier diets can also help protect forests, water systems, and biodiversity. “This means enabling healthy diets is not just a solution for the nutrition community,” she said. “It’s a solution for the environmental community as well.” Image Credits: Maayan Hoffman, WMO. Next Steps: Tension About How to Settle the Pandemic Agreement’s Annex 21/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Lancet editor Richard Horton (left) moderates a panel with Helen Clark, Precious Matsoso and Raj Panjabi at the Geneva Graduate Institute. There are tensions between World Health Organization (WHO) member states about how to approach the final negotiations on the pandemic agreement – an annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing system (PABS), according to Precious Matsoso, who co-chaired the negotiations. “There’s an argument about whether you invite experts to start working on a technical document and then invite member states to discuss the details and negotiate amongst themselves, or get member states to submit their inputs and discuss and only then would you invite experts,” Matsoso told on event at the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute on Tuesday. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), co-chaired by Matsoso of South Africa and French Global Health Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou, hands the PABS talks to an Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG). The working group is supposed to conclude talks on annex by next year’s WHA and, once adopted, the pandemic agreement will then be open for signature and ratification. Once 60 countries have ratified it, the agreement will enter into force. The IGWG will also begin to set up a Coordinating Financial Mechanism for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and the Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network (GSCL). Helen Clark, co-chair of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, said the IGWG was expected to start work in September. She flagged the 2026 United Nations High-Level Meeting on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response as an opportunity to “push for rapid ratification” – or agreement on the annex if it has not yet been passed. “The message we could send out to countries is: start looking at your national procedures and doing your national tests, and be ready to run on ratification when the annex is actually agreed,” Clark told the Graduate School audience. Clark added that while South Africa, as chair of the G20, was supportive of pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, the US was due to assume the chair in 2026. “Will they take the chair next year, or will it pass to someone else? If they take the chair, what hope is there for any of this? That’s an open question. I’m not a diplomat, so I can put this question on the on the table. If they take the chair, it could be treading water for a year, for with G20,” said Clark, who is a former Prime Minister of New Zealand. Role of EU in talks Speaking shortly after the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary adopted the pandemic agreement, Matsoso said that the “Slovakia drama” raised questions about how regional blocs operated during negotiations. Slovakia, whose Prime Minister Robert Fico is opposed to mRNA vaccines, demanded a vote on the pandemic agreement resolution during a committee discussion on Monday night. The resolution was passed by 124 votes in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. But Matsoso said Slovakia was part of the European Union (EU), which had negotiated as a bloc, so it should have been party to the regional position. Matsoso added that some of the countries that had abstained had explained they “were still going through their own internal processes, and had not been given a mandate to vote” as they had expected the agreement would be adopted by consensus. Dr Raj Panjabi, former White House official under Joe Biden, said there were three things to watch to ensure the pandemic agreement was implemented: independent monitoring and clear accountability; adequate financing, and “increasing regional self reliance”. “Ensuring that financing is stepped up [is] very hard in this moment when overseas development assistance is being pulled back, not just by my country, the United States, but by several others,” said Panjabi. “The WHO is more strained than ever, and that’s why ensuring that assessed contributions are increased is going to be critical, as is harmonising and leveraging other funds in the system,” said Panjabi. Regional self-reliance Panjabi defined regional self reliance as “an entire end-to-end focus, from research and development, investment and innovation to enhancing manufacturing and ensuring that the delivery of counter-measures in the next pandemic occurs,” said Panjabi. Swedish global health expert Anders Nordström (left) moderates a panel with Diah Saminarsih, Eloise Todd, Michel Kazatchkine and Mariangelo Simao. However, Brazil’s deputy minister of health, Mariângela Simão, warned that, while there is a G20 coalition on local and regional production, “there’s so much that you can do at country level”. “Research and Development is one of the things that I’m more worried about – the capacity to copy what’s already developed and make safe and quality-assured products. We don’t need reinventing the wheel everywhere. We need to recognise what are global public goods and then make sure they are available at country level… you can’t have everyone producing everything.” UNAIDS special adviser Michel Kazatchkine said that he could not see a world “that is just a juxtaposition of regions without any glue, without any coordination, without any compass”. This, he added, is the role of the WHO, providing “vaccine blueprints, pre-qualification, its normative role”. In the future, global health “will not look like a top-down construction that it has been with money flowing from Geneva to various places”, Kazatchkine stressed. “The international money will be there to complement the national and the regional efforts, because global health is also about global solidarity.” But Eloise Todd, who leads the Pandemic Action Network (PAN), noted that one of the biggest learnings from the COVID pandemic is “definitely no country, and certainly no region that can do it all themselves”. “We’re in a very uncomfortable place in which we know that there are modernisations and ways in which we need to reform to support the regionalisation agenda and the country agenda, but we certainly shouldn’t be doing it at the pace and with the disregard being done at present. “We’re in this tension between the excellent work that some global entities do to fill a gap. And so what do you do about that? You can’t cut it away and risk lives, but we have to have, like, a 10 ,15, 20-year conversation about powering that down and getting towards proper national and regional level intersectionality.” Nations Approve WHO Membership Fee Increase as US Exit Squeezes Budget 20/05/2025 Stefan Anderson Delegates gathered on Tuesday at the World Health Assembly agreed a new WHO budget for the 2026–2027 period which included a rise in membership fees. Photo WHO/Pierre Albouy. Nations at the 78th World Health Assembly approved a new budget and a 20% increase in annual membership fees for the World Health Organisation (WHO), handing the embattled UN health agency a crucial lifeline as it grapples with the financial bomb dropped on Geneva by the United States’ withdrawal from international institutions. The vote marks the second consecutive 20% hike in membership dues in as many budgets, which the agency’s member states approve on a biennial basis, the last coming in 2024. The move is part of a long-term plan to boost mandatory contributions from 16% of WHO’s core budget at the start of the decade to 50% by 2030 to reduce its dependence on the whims of major donors like the now-departed US. These membership fees provide the organization with flexible funding it can allocate according to its own priorities, unlike the voluntary contributions that typically come strictly earmarked by donors for specific programmes that have historically made up the vast majority of the WHO’s budget. Under the new budget, assessed contributions will make up 40% of the WHO’s base program budget of $4.2 billion for the 2026-27 period. The core budget does not include emergency humanitarian appeals or polio programmes, which bring the total budget target up to $6.2 billion. The fee increase, initially mandated in a 2022 resolution at the WHO’s executive assembly, faced an uncertain path to approval on Tuesday, with member nations engaging in tense pre-vote debates over the fairness of regional funding cuts in the new budget – which will run for two years starting in 2026 – and demands for greater transparency in expenditure tracking. Projected financing for the base programmes segment of the budget for 2026–2027, compared to previous bienniums, in US$ million. A battle of buzzwords played out during the proceedings: supporters of the fee increase championed “flexible, predictable, sustainable and agile” funding, while skeptics countered with demands for “efficiency,” “transparency,” elimination of “redundancy” and “cost-effectiveness” – signaling clearly that the WHO’s financial reprieve comes with strings and expectations attached. WHO officials had acknowledged in the budget document they were “cognizant that such an increase will not be automatically granted” amid overlapping global crises straining national budgets worldwide. In the end, a collective recognition of the existential financial threat facing the agency carried the budget over the line. The chamber fell silent during the vote, with no objections raised. “There is a crisis,” WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared following the vote. “But we will use this crisis as an opportunity and make sure our organisation emerges sharper and more empowered.” Germany’s delegation, the WHO’s most important financial backer since the American departure, hailed the decision as “historic” — but not before voicing their support in song. “I tell you what I want, what I really, really want,” the German representative sang in an awkward rendition of the Spice Girls hit befitting the oft-lively proceedings of Committee A, “and that is that we all indeed are serious about functioning and effective multilateralism.” “The increase is the best vaccination against the highest financial risk that WHO faces,” he added, “its dependency on a very few donors, and the discrepancy between the expectations we all put on the organisation and its ability to fulfil them.” Financial triage Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. The agency has been in financial triage mode since the US exit announcement in November, implementing drastic budget reductions to secure votes that earned praise from member states for its “budgetary realism.” Before the US departure, the 2026-27 budget required to fulfill WHO’s core mission was projected at $5.3 billion over the two year period. Following Tuesday’s vote, the target plummeted to $4.2 billion, a 22% cut that will impact the agency’s operations worldwide. The revised budget represents a $700 million decrease from projections presented at WHO’s January executive board meeting, but even this diminished figure approved in Geneva remains aspirational. Level of projected financing for the base programmes segment of the Proposed programme budget 2026–2027, US$ million. While WHO secured an additional $170 million toward its 2026-27 budget Tuesday evening following major commitments of $50 million a year from China and first-time donors Mongolia and Cambodia, among others, the agency still faces a $1.5 billion funding shortfall on top of the $1.1 billion decrease from previous budget projections. The two new donor nations join 42 additional first-time voluntary contributors to WHO, including seven low-income and 28 lower-middle and upper-middle income countries. “With the exception of the headquarters and the European region, the allocated or proposed budget for every regional office is currently higher, even after the reduction, than the projected implementation,” explained Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. Without additional contributions, further life-threatening program cuts loom. All of the WHO’s six regions face significant cuts heading into the 2026-27 period covered by the budget. Regional office budgets are set to fall by 14%, with the African region facing the largest total cut of $153 million year-on-year. The agency’s Geneva headquarters will lose nearly a quarter of its annual funding. China announced it will contribute $500 million to the WHO over the next five-year period, though it was unclear whether this includes the 20% increase in its fee contributions. This will make China, for the first time, the largest fee payer in the WHO, supplanting the US as it exits. “We can only implement the budget if we have the financing,” Hollo said, noting the “personal sacrifice” that member states will need to make should the funding target remain unmet. More freedom, less money WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Raul Thomas, the Assistant Director-General for Business Operations at WHO address the committee following the successful vote. The WHO’s budget victory comes amid a zero-sum competition for international aid dollars, with UN agencies and humanitarian organisations worldwide scrambling to fill gaps left by America’s retreat from global commitments. Since January, the White House has systematically dismantled the US Agency for International Development (USAID) – historically the world’s largest humanitarian donor – while slashing support for the United Nations and WHO’s sister agencies. By March, over 80% of USAID programs had been shuttered, punching a $60 billion hole in global aid budgets. This broader retreat from international commitments has left organisations like the UN Refugee Agency and Office for Humanitarian Affairs and non-governental humanitarian organisations scrambling for resources just as the WHO does the same, creating unprecedented competition for a dwindling pool of donor funds that no single government appears willing or able to replenish. In the latest sign of distress, top UN officials told staff at a town hall in New York City Tuesday that the organization is considering a 20% reduction across every secretariat under the UN umbrella for 2026 — from humanitarian affairs, to human rights, peacekeeping operations, and development programs — heightening the financial crisis in the world of international institutions and those who depend on them. Several major financial contributors to WHO, including Germany, France, and the EU delegation, pressed the agency to develop contingency plans for potential fundraising shortfalls as the UN system creaks under the weight of the US withdrawal. “Should the resources, the $1.65 billion, not materialise, the idea is that we will be in a position to actually scale back or ramp up,” said Raul Thomas, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for business operations who led the budget consultations with member states. “We never know – I’m the eternal optimist. Maybe we’ll get much more money than the 1.65 million. That’s the gap right now.” Presidents and Prime Ministers Celebrate the Passing of the Pandemic Agreement 20/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan WHO officials including the co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso (right) celebrate the World Health Assembly’s adoption of the pandemic agreement. Presidents, prime ministers and even opera singers, celebrated the unanimous adoption of the world’s first Pandemic Agreement by consensus at the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary on Tuesday morning. Despite the 11th-hour insistence of Slovakia on a vote on the agreement in Committee A on Monday night, none of the World Health Organization (WHO) member states obstructed the agreement’s adoption at the plenary. Instead, it was presented as a rare example of successful multilateral engagement in a world of heightened conflict. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço commended the WHO’s resilience in the face of “unfair and unjust criticism”, and pledged an additional $8 million from his country to the WHO. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço Speaking on behalf of the 55 AU member states, Lourenço said the continent is “united in supporting the proposal to increase assessed contributions” [membership fees] as “the WHO is the only institution with a universal mandate to protect global health and promote equity”. China’s Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong pledged an “additional quota of $500 million over five years” to the WHO, at the plenary, and urged all countries to “support the WHO to play a central coordinating role in global health governance” and enable it “to perform its duty in an independent, professional and science-based manner”. Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, also in the room, described the WHO as “a beacon of hope and a guardian of humanity’s right to health”. Plenković described sustainable financing of the WHO as “a strategic imperative” to enable “timely responses to emergencies and meaningful support where it is needed most”. Egyptian opera singer Farrah El-Dibany and soprano singers Elaine Vidal and Eunice Miller of the Philippines also performed for the assembly. Macron appeals to US scientists Emmanuel Macron addresses the WHA plenary in a recorded message. “Our first line of defence is the WHO,” said French President Emmanuel Macron in a recorded message. He then appealed to “all those researchers who want to freely continue to do their work” – a veiled reference to US scientists dismissed during US President Donald Trump’s massive budget cuts – to move to Europe. “We will be happy to welcome you in Europe, because that will be good for Europe, for medical research, for you and for everyone. It’s not a question of ‘if’ we will have a new pandemic. It’s a question of ‘when’ we’ll have it,” said Macron. South African and G20 President Cyril Ramaphosa, and the leaders of the Philippines, Peru, Mongolia and Senegal also sent recorded messages of support. The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a coherent global health architecture and described the pandemic agreement as “historic”. As one leader after another defended the WHO and multilateralism, Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO loomed as the elephant in the room – and the target of unspoken rebuke. So it was timely – but also surprising – that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr also sent a recorded message to the plenary. Unlike the other messages, however, Kennedy claimed that the WHO “has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest and international power politics”. “The WHO has not even come to terms with its failures during COVID, let alone made significant reforms. Instead, it has doubled down with the pandemic agreement, which will lock in all of the dysfunctions of the WHO pandemic response,” he added, without articulating any specific US objections to the agreement. ‘Eyes on the prize’ Namibian Health Minister and chair of Committee A, Dr Esperance Luvindao, Dr Tedros and Dr Mike Ryan applauding the vote on the pandemic agreement in Committee A on Monday night. Addressing the plenary after the leaders’ messages, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus paid tribute to those who negotiated the pandemic agreement. “You have engaged in very tough negotiations. Sometimes the disagreements were sharp, the discussions heated and the frustration evident. Sometimes it seemed the distance between you might be too great to overcome. But you kept your eyes on the prize, and did not stop until you had achieved it,” said Tedros, adding that sometimes delegates had talked all night in the windowless basement room of the WHO headquarters where the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) met. “The pandemic agreement has been negotiated by countries for countries, and will be implemented in countries in accordance with their own national laws,” stressed Tedros, referring to the “torrent of mis- and disinformation” that claimed the agreement will “infringe on national sovereignty” and give the WHO Secretariat “power to impose mask or vaccine mandates or lockdowns. “Today, you have sent a loud message that multilateralism not only works, but is the only way to find shared solutions to shared threats. Let’s not understate what you have achieved. You have made the world a safer place,” stressed Tedros. Pathogens ‘won’t wait’ The agreement was welcomed by the co-chairs of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, former President of Liberia, and Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand. “Consider this agreement a foundation from which to build, starting today,” said Clark. “Many gaps remain in finance, equitable access to medical countermeasures and in understanding evolving risks. Don’t wait to get started. Dangerous pathogens are looming, and they certainly will not wait. The Third World Network said that the “next phases of negotiations, beginning with the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), will determine whether this agreement becomes a meaningful tool for equity or if it remains merely symbolic”. “At stake is the ability of developing countries to access affordable vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics swiftly and fairly during health emergencies and to realize the ambition of a fairer and more effective global health architecture that can equitably prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics,” said TWN. Dr David Reddy, director-general of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), said that, as the next level of detail of the agreement is worked through, it is essential that the experience of pharmaceutical companies is drawn upon “so that their expertise can be mobilized when needed”. This includes how the PABS will work “where we must make sure that companies are able to access the pathogens and sequence information as quickly as possible to undertake scientific research and avoid unnecessary conditions that make it harder for companies to do so”, Reddy stressed. He added that “intellectual property protections that are essential for pharmaceutical companies to invest in high-risk R&D, must not be eroded and instead should enable partnerships on voluntary and mutually agreed terms, in a way that draws on the expertise and networks of each company.” ‘US is not indispensible’ Public Citizen Access to Medicines Director Peter Maybarduk said that “WHO member states chose health and justice today, despite RFK’s cheap insult, the reckless US withdrawal and Trump’s deadly neglect of infectious disease threats. “The world moved forward without the US today. Trump’s devastating cuts cast a shadow on the talks, and are on course to cost millions of lives, including the lives of Americans made more vulnerable to infectious disease,” said Maybarduk. “Still, countries came together amidst scarcity to commit themselves to a more just and healthy world, and that is worth celebrating.” Matthew Kavanagh, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Global Health Policy and Politics, said that the US “did not show up for the final negotiations but it turns out the US is not indispensable and, in fact, perhaps not having the US engaged is what enabled more cooperation.” “With the current administration seemingly intent on dismantling global public health efforts, it may be the best case scenario if the rest of the world can come together. In that way, this new agreement is a spot of light in and otherwise dark geopolitical environment for fighting pandemics,” Kavanagh told Health Policy Watch. Image Credits: WHO. Can Technology Tame the NCD Crisis? Experts Call for Smarter, Inclusive Digital Health Solutions 20/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman Digital blood pressure monitoring devices have now become widely available The pace of technological change today is nothing short of revolutionary, according to Dr Douglas Bettcher, Senior Advisor in the Director-General’s Office at the World Health Organization (WHO). “I think we find ourselves very strangely in the last couple of years, in what seems to be a really brave new world, brave new reality,” he told attendees at Monday’s Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF) event, which focused on how digital innovations could help prevent and manage noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). “A case can be made that this communications revolution is even greater and more mind-boggling than what we’ve seen in the past,” Bettcher continued. “Even some pundits in the know compare this to the 19th-century industrial revolution. And what must be clear to us, being confronted with these very, very rapid changes, is that we in the public health community cannot be left standing during this digital innovation, this mass revolution.” Bettcher, who discussed WHO’s Be He@lthy, Be Mobile (BHBM) program, stressed that the train has already left the station. Industries that harm health are already leveraging artificial intelligence and related technologies. Now, he said, it’s time for those working to improve health to use them too. The Monday event—hosted as a side event of the 78th World Health Assembly—was a collaboration between GSCF, WHO, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Titled “Empowering Self-Care: Digital Innovations for NCD Prevention and Management,” it highlighted the vital role of self-care and digital technology in tackling NCDs, emphasizing cross-sector collaboration. Keynote addresses were given by H.E. Honourable Tuafafa Latasi, a member of the Tuvalu parliament, and Dr Dympna Kavanagh, the Chief Dental Officer of Ireland’s Department of Health. “Digital innovation has the power to transform healthcare and how we look after ourselves,” said moderator Shiulie Ghosh. “That is the role of digital innovation in preventing and managing some of the biggest causes of death across the globe.” She emphasized that digital tools can improve access to self-care and empower individuals living with NCDs to monitor and manage their conditions effectively. GSCF Director-General Greg Perry added, “We are at a pivotal moment in NCDs,” referring to WHO’s release last week of the zero draft of the political declaration on NCDs and mental health. The draft was published in preparation for the upcoming High-Level Meeting on September 25. Greg Perry (center) The declaration outlines proposed global targets for 2030: 150 million fewer people using tobacco 150 million more people managing their hypertension 150 million more people gaining access to mental health care The 10-page draft includes a set of five sub-targets, offering a roadmap for reaching these ambitious goals. “Digital tools can play a very, very important part,” Perry told the audience. “When we talk about self-care, we’re not just about keeping fit, eating correctly, or even brushing our teeth. We’re talking about the necessary tools for people to self-care.” These tools may include medicines and digital applications from the industry’s perspective. “If you add AI and digital applications together with the current and future self-care tools that are available and will be available, we are on the verge of almost a self-care revolution,” Perry said. “These [tools] will be accessible, they’ll be self-managed, and they will have a very high impact.” Making digital self-care tools useful and trusted One key challenge with emerging digital self-care tools is the lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into people’s daily lives. Luis Lourenço of the International Pharmaceutical Federation noted that pharmacists are often the first point of contact when individuals seek advice or support related to digital tools. “When you talk about the impact of digital tools on primary health care, you can focus on four major areas: prevention, health literacy, diagnosis, and the management of a chronic disease,” Lourenço said. He added that health literacy is often one of the most complicated aspects. While having access to information is essential, Lourenço emphasized that it’s not enough. People also need to understand the information and apply it in their routines. “What’s the point of having information about your blood pressure if you don’t understand what it means or when to incorporate it?” he asked. “What we have today is a lot of access to information, but people rely a lot, mostly on their healthcare partners, healthcare professionals, and pharmacists.” Without that support, he said, people may have information but not know how to use it effectively. Lourenço also pointed out that people want to be sure the tools they use are evidence-based and trustworthy. However, Debbie Rogers, CEO of Reach Digital Health, offered a slightly different perspective, suggesting that if digital tools provide enough value, people will ultimately trust them. Addressing accessibility, accountability, and inclusion Another key challenge is user hesitation, particularly among specific populations, about whether they want to use digital tools at all. “On one hand, we have developed countries. We have higher literacy levels. We have digital-savvy sort of people,” explained Hussain Jafri of the World Patient Alliance. “They are using [digital tools] and giving us very good results. But then you look at the other populations—at the lower- and middle-income countries and the elderly population, the people who are not tech-savvy. They are not really using them.” Jafri shared that he once downloaded an app designed for people with pre-diabetes but found it too complicated and deleted it after only a few days. Experts said encouraging adoption also depends on better integration of these tools into healthcare systems, where people feel accountable for the data they enter. Lourenço noted that if patients knew their doctors were reviewing the data collected in an app, it would likely motivate them to use the tool more consistently. Jafri stressed that companies developing digital health technologies must involve users, patients, and providers early in the design process, rather than waiting until products are already on the market. “I think they also need to take into account our input—the input of the people who are going to use [the tools] should also be there while they’re developing these products, so that, you know, once it is out there, people are happy using it,” he said. Language accessibility is another barrier. Jafri emphasized the importance of localization. “These [tools] need to be in multiple languages, not just English,” he said, adding that companies should also provide training for providers and patients to ensure successful adoption. Empowering mothers through technology: South African case study A pregnant woman in Africa (illustrative) There are already promising examples of how digital health tools are making a difference, as illustrated by Rogers of Reach Digital Health. She shared a case from South Africa, where hypertension during pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. “We have a program called MomConnect, where every mother who comes into the clinic can sign up to receive messaging throughout her pregnancy and until her baby is two years old,” Rogers explained. The mothers receive both information and behavior-change tips. They can also ask questions and provide feedback to the system. Because hypertension is such a critical issue, the National Department of Health wanted to better understand the root causes. They started by asking mothers about their experience during their first antenatal visit: Did they have their blood pressure taken? Were they told what the results were? If so, were they prescribed the appropriate medication? “It was important to understand that patient journey, understand where the challenges were, and to do this at a national scale,” Rogers said. Based on the insights gathered, the department introduced targeted training for healthcare workers. This effort helped drive increased demand for quality care from the patients themselves. “We got mothers to go back to their clinic and say, ‘You didn’t take my blood pressure last time. I want you to take my blood pressure,’ or ‘you didn’t put me on the right medication.'” Rogers concluded that this initiative “shows the power of being able to empower people, both with information and behavior change, communication knowledge, so they knew what they had to ask for and what they were looking out for.” Carl Massonneau, Technical Officer for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research for the WHO, speaking from the audience, explained that another tool recently released by the World Health Organization is the Digital Adaptation Kit for Antenatal Care. The kit translates WHO recommendations into machine-readable formats, making integrating them into digital health systems easier. Carl Massonneau of the WHO One specific feature of the kit is a tool for self-monitoring blood pressure among pregnant women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders. That tool will be released next week. “It’s the first time we’re putting a step in this world and trying to provide standards to improve the quality of digital health interventions we have,” Massonneau said. He acknowledged that although a growing number of digital technologies are available, there are still major challenges in ensuring they are evidence-based, equitable, and accessible. Integrating Digital Tools Into Broader NCD Strategies As the conversation around digital health tools evolves, experts caution that no single solution will address the full complexity of noncommunicable diseases. Lourenço noted that while some aspects of NCDs fall under primary prevention, where individuals can be empowered to make healthier choices, others require more structured support. He said that strategic outreach, including digital media, can help move people from “pre-contemplation to contemplation,” encouraging them to recognize risks, develop motivation, and ultimately commit to change. However, he emphasized that many behaviors tied to NCDs cannot be addressed through self-care alone. These require ongoing guidance and system-level support. Effective management, Lourenço said, demands full integration within a broader framework—” at the policy level, at the health system level, [and] at the community level.” In this context, digital innovation is not a silver bullet but a key part of a larger ecosystem—one that must be built with intentional design, inclusive access, and cross-sector collaboration to truly transform outcomes in global health. Image Credits: Marco Verch/Flickr , Provided by Global Self-Care Foundation, Elizabeth Poll/MMV, Elaine Fletcher. Country After Country Endorse Pandemic Agreement in Enormous Show of Support 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Countries indicating their wish to speak about the pandemic agreement in Committee A An enormous list of World Health Organization (WHO) member states, 173 in all, lined up to speak in favour of the pandemic agreement at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on Monday – an extraordinary demonstration of the breadth of support for the document. By the end yesterday’s meeting of Committee A, member states passed the pandemic agreement resolution by vote not consensus – at the insistence of Slovakia – with 124 in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. The WHA plenary is due to consider the resolution on Tuesday. But between the cheers were reminders that the talks are not yet done. An annex still needs to be negotiated to establish the mechanisms for a pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) system – the most controversial aspect of the three-year talks. The PABS system will develop a mechanism for how countries that share information about pathogens with pandemic potential may benefit if pharmaceutical products are developed as a result. “As a country that has shared its pathogens, often without equitable returns, the PABS system is paramount in rectifying these imbalances and ensuring the realisation of genuine equity and equitable access,” said South African Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, speaking for the Africa region in Committee A, where the document was being discussed. The Africa region sees the target of 20% of pandemic products being reserved for the WHO for distribution to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by manufacturers participating in PABS, with at least 10% as a donation, during future pandemics, as a “positive first step”, added Motsoaledi. Speaker after speaker urged countries to maintain their political commitment to the PABS negotiations and reach an agreement on the annex before next year’s WHA. Even Hungary, a staunch ally of United States President Donald Trump, welcomed the agreement – and stressed that it did not infringe on countries’ sovereignty, a key claim of disinformation about the pandemic. Trump distanced the US from the pandemic agreement at the outset of his presidency in January, and many of his MAGA supporters claim it is a “power grab” by the WHO. Iran and Paraguay said they could not support the current pandemic agreement draft – reserving support until after the PABS negotiations. Meanwhile, Slovakia, which is led by Prime Minister Robert Fico who has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccines, demanded that the agreement be put to a vote during the committee session. Delegates at WHA’s Committee A after it adopted the pandemic agreeemnt by vote First ‘One Health’ agreement Germany said it “would have welcomed stronger provisions, particularly regarding prevention,” but “recognise this agreement as a critical and timely step toward global solidarity and multilateralism”. “We urge all member states to engage in the upcoming annex negotiations with the same political will and unity that have brought us this far. Let us continue to invest in international cooperation and global solidarity, not only to protect our citizens, but also to lay the groundwork that future generations can benefit from,” said Germany. Switzerland, which has sought to protect its pharmaceutical sector during talks, said it supports “a pragmatic, voluntary approach within existing frameworks, that take into account the advice and contributions from experts”. The European Union said that the agreement “marks an important accomplishment for global health security and cooperation” and “can bolster country capacities to prevent and prepare for pandemics using the One Health approach”. Ireland added that “the commitment to [pandemic] prevention through a One Health approach is the first of its kind to recognise the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health in our response to emerging health trends”. “The establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network and a pathogen access and benefit sharing system will ensure that the response to future health threats will be faster, more effective and more equitable,” it added. China said the agreement “will contribute to the fair distribution of health products, relevant technologies and resources to help developing countries enhance their capacities for prevention, preparedness and response” – but that it needed “some follow-up mechanisms, as well as sustained investment and capacity building efforts from all countries” to be effective. Kazakhstan said that “this is not just a global legal document. It is our collective response to a future where everybody will be protected, regardless of their economic position or status. We must underscore that the success outcome will be defined not only by its content, but also by its ability the state’s ability to implement it.” Jamaica, speaking for 22 countries in the Americas and Caribbean (excluding the USA), said the region was ready to do the work to finish the pandemic agreement. “We remember too vividly the oxygen shortages, the overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare workers, and over seven million lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jamaica. “For the Americas, this agreement means stronger commitments to regional manufacturing capacity, coordinated surveillance, research and development and transfer of technology, especially for developing countries.” ‘The worst of times’ INB co-chairs Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso Co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), South Africa’s Precious Matsoso and French Ambassador for Global Health Anne-Claire Amprou, also addressed the session, expressing appreciation to member states for their commitment. Matsoso reminded the WHA that the special assembly called to establish the INB was convened “at a time when we all wore masks, we practised social distancing, and we had face-to-face meetings that were highly restricted”. “It was the worst of times, the season of despair, of tragic losses, immeasurable devastation – all associated with COVID-19,” said Matsoso. She praised delegates for working through “13 formal rounds of negotiations, many of them extended, producing various iterations of draft pandemic agreement and proposals that have culminated into what we have before us as a consensus draft”. Amprou, who took over as co-chair from Roland Driece of the Netherlands in July 2024, said that the process involved “three years of dialogue, of compromise, of debates, of sleepless nights, but above all, three years guided by a common conviction that health is a common good”. “The COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for us all. It was a brutal reminder of the fact that viruses know no borders. No country, however powerful, can address a global health crisis on its own,” said Amprou. Meanwhile, former co-chair Driece spoke for the Netherlands, expressed his appreciation that the long process had resulted in an agreement. Image Credits: WHO. Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Next Steps: Tension About How to Settle the Pandemic Agreement’s Annex 21/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Lancet editor Richard Horton (left) moderates a panel with Helen Clark, Precious Matsoso and Raj Panjabi at the Geneva Graduate Institute. There are tensions between World Health Organization (WHO) member states about how to approach the final negotiations on the pandemic agreement – an annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing system (PABS), according to Precious Matsoso, who co-chaired the negotiations. “There’s an argument about whether you invite experts to start working on a technical document and then invite member states to discuss the details and negotiate amongst themselves, or get member states to submit their inputs and discuss and only then would you invite experts,” Matsoso told on event at the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute on Tuesday. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), co-chaired by Matsoso of South Africa and French Global Health Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou, hands the PABS talks to an Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG). The working group is supposed to conclude talks on annex by next year’s WHA and, once adopted, the pandemic agreement will then be open for signature and ratification. Once 60 countries have ratified it, the agreement will enter into force. The IGWG will also begin to set up a Coordinating Financial Mechanism for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and the Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network (GSCL). Helen Clark, co-chair of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, said the IGWG was expected to start work in September. She flagged the 2026 United Nations High-Level Meeting on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response as an opportunity to “push for rapid ratification” – or agreement on the annex if it has not yet been passed. “The message we could send out to countries is: start looking at your national procedures and doing your national tests, and be ready to run on ratification when the annex is actually agreed,” Clark told the Graduate School audience. Clark added that while South Africa, as chair of the G20, was supportive of pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, the US was due to assume the chair in 2026. “Will they take the chair next year, or will it pass to someone else? If they take the chair, what hope is there for any of this? That’s an open question. I’m not a diplomat, so I can put this question on the on the table. If they take the chair, it could be treading water for a year, for with G20,” said Clark, who is a former Prime Minister of New Zealand. Role of EU in talks Speaking shortly after the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary adopted the pandemic agreement, Matsoso said that the “Slovakia drama” raised questions about how regional blocs operated during negotiations. Slovakia, whose Prime Minister Robert Fico is opposed to mRNA vaccines, demanded a vote on the pandemic agreement resolution during a committee discussion on Monday night. The resolution was passed by 124 votes in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. But Matsoso said Slovakia was part of the European Union (EU), which had negotiated as a bloc, so it should have been party to the regional position. Matsoso added that some of the countries that had abstained had explained they “were still going through their own internal processes, and had not been given a mandate to vote” as they had expected the agreement would be adopted by consensus. Dr Raj Panjabi, former White House official under Joe Biden, said there were three things to watch to ensure the pandemic agreement was implemented: independent monitoring and clear accountability; adequate financing, and “increasing regional self reliance”. “Ensuring that financing is stepped up [is] very hard in this moment when overseas development assistance is being pulled back, not just by my country, the United States, but by several others,” said Panjabi. “The WHO is more strained than ever, and that’s why ensuring that assessed contributions are increased is going to be critical, as is harmonising and leveraging other funds in the system,” said Panjabi. Regional self-reliance Panjabi defined regional self reliance as “an entire end-to-end focus, from research and development, investment and innovation to enhancing manufacturing and ensuring that the delivery of counter-measures in the next pandemic occurs,” said Panjabi. Swedish global health expert Anders Nordström (left) moderates a panel with Diah Saminarsih, Eloise Todd, Michel Kazatchkine and Mariangelo Simao. However, Brazil’s deputy minister of health, Mariângela Simão, warned that, while there is a G20 coalition on local and regional production, “there’s so much that you can do at country level”. “Research and Development is one of the things that I’m more worried about – the capacity to copy what’s already developed and make safe and quality-assured products. We don’t need reinventing the wheel everywhere. We need to recognise what are global public goods and then make sure they are available at country level… you can’t have everyone producing everything.” UNAIDS special adviser Michel Kazatchkine said that he could not see a world “that is just a juxtaposition of regions without any glue, without any coordination, without any compass”. This, he added, is the role of the WHO, providing “vaccine blueprints, pre-qualification, its normative role”. In the future, global health “will not look like a top-down construction that it has been with money flowing from Geneva to various places”, Kazatchkine stressed. “The international money will be there to complement the national and the regional efforts, because global health is also about global solidarity.” But Eloise Todd, who leads the Pandemic Action Network (PAN), noted that one of the biggest learnings from the COVID pandemic is “definitely no country, and certainly no region that can do it all themselves”. “We’re in a very uncomfortable place in which we know that there are modernisations and ways in which we need to reform to support the regionalisation agenda and the country agenda, but we certainly shouldn’t be doing it at the pace and with the disregard being done at present. “We’re in this tension between the excellent work that some global entities do to fill a gap. And so what do you do about that? You can’t cut it away and risk lives, but we have to have, like, a 10 ,15, 20-year conversation about powering that down and getting towards proper national and regional level intersectionality.” Nations Approve WHO Membership Fee Increase as US Exit Squeezes Budget 20/05/2025 Stefan Anderson Delegates gathered on Tuesday at the World Health Assembly agreed a new WHO budget for the 2026–2027 period which included a rise in membership fees. Photo WHO/Pierre Albouy. Nations at the 78th World Health Assembly approved a new budget and a 20% increase in annual membership fees for the World Health Organisation (WHO), handing the embattled UN health agency a crucial lifeline as it grapples with the financial bomb dropped on Geneva by the United States’ withdrawal from international institutions. The vote marks the second consecutive 20% hike in membership dues in as many budgets, which the agency’s member states approve on a biennial basis, the last coming in 2024. The move is part of a long-term plan to boost mandatory contributions from 16% of WHO’s core budget at the start of the decade to 50% by 2030 to reduce its dependence on the whims of major donors like the now-departed US. These membership fees provide the organization with flexible funding it can allocate according to its own priorities, unlike the voluntary contributions that typically come strictly earmarked by donors for specific programmes that have historically made up the vast majority of the WHO’s budget. Under the new budget, assessed contributions will make up 40% of the WHO’s base program budget of $4.2 billion for the 2026-27 period. The core budget does not include emergency humanitarian appeals or polio programmes, which bring the total budget target up to $6.2 billion. The fee increase, initially mandated in a 2022 resolution at the WHO’s executive assembly, faced an uncertain path to approval on Tuesday, with member nations engaging in tense pre-vote debates over the fairness of regional funding cuts in the new budget – which will run for two years starting in 2026 – and demands for greater transparency in expenditure tracking. Projected financing for the base programmes segment of the budget for 2026–2027, compared to previous bienniums, in US$ million. A battle of buzzwords played out during the proceedings: supporters of the fee increase championed “flexible, predictable, sustainable and agile” funding, while skeptics countered with demands for “efficiency,” “transparency,” elimination of “redundancy” and “cost-effectiveness” – signaling clearly that the WHO’s financial reprieve comes with strings and expectations attached. WHO officials had acknowledged in the budget document they were “cognizant that such an increase will not be automatically granted” amid overlapping global crises straining national budgets worldwide. In the end, a collective recognition of the existential financial threat facing the agency carried the budget over the line. The chamber fell silent during the vote, with no objections raised. “There is a crisis,” WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared following the vote. “But we will use this crisis as an opportunity and make sure our organisation emerges sharper and more empowered.” Germany’s delegation, the WHO’s most important financial backer since the American departure, hailed the decision as “historic” — but not before voicing their support in song. “I tell you what I want, what I really, really want,” the German representative sang in an awkward rendition of the Spice Girls hit befitting the oft-lively proceedings of Committee A, “and that is that we all indeed are serious about functioning and effective multilateralism.” “The increase is the best vaccination against the highest financial risk that WHO faces,” he added, “its dependency on a very few donors, and the discrepancy between the expectations we all put on the organisation and its ability to fulfil them.” Financial triage Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. The agency has been in financial triage mode since the US exit announcement in November, implementing drastic budget reductions to secure votes that earned praise from member states for its “budgetary realism.” Before the US departure, the 2026-27 budget required to fulfill WHO’s core mission was projected at $5.3 billion over the two year period. Following Tuesday’s vote, the target plummeted to $4.2 billion, a 22% cut that will impact the agency’s operations worldwide. The revised budget represents a $700 million decrease from projections presented at WHO’s January executive board meeting, but even this diminished figure approved in Geneva remains aspirational. Level of projected financing for the base programmes segment of the Proposed programme budget 2026–2027, US$ million. While WHO secured an additional $170 million toward its 2026-27 budget Tuesday evening following major commitments of $50 million a year from China and first-time donors Mongolia and Cambodia, among others, the agency still faces a $1.5 billion funding shortfall on top of the $1.1 billion decrease from previous budget projections. The two new donor nations join 42 additional first-time voluntary contributors to WHO, including seven low-income and 28 lower-middle and upper-middle income countries. “With the exception of the headquarters and the European region, the allocated or proposed budget for every regional office is currently higher, even after the reduction, than the projected implementation,” explained Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. Without additional contributions, further life-threatening program cuts loom. All of the WHO’s six regions face significant cuts heading into the 2026-27 period covered by the budget. Regional office budgets are set to fall by 14%, with the African region facing the largest total cut of $153 million year-on-year. The agency’s Geneva headquarters will lose nearly a quarter of its annual funding. China announced it will contribute $500 million to the WHO over the next five-year period, though it was unclear whether this includes the 20% increase in its fee contributions. This will make China, for the first time, the largest fee payer in the WHO, supplanting the US as it exits. “We can only implement the budget if we have the financing,” Hollo said, noting the “personal sacrifice” that member states will need to make should the funding target remain unmet. More freedom, less money WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Raul Thomas, the Assistant Director-General for Business Operations at WHO address the committee following the successful vote. The WHO’s budget victory comes amid a zero-sum competition for international aid dollars, with UN agencies and humanitarian organisations worldwide scrambling to fill gaps left by America’s retreat from global commitments. Since January, the White House has systematically dismantled the US Agency for International Development (USAID) – historically the world’s largest humanitarian donor – while slashing support for the United Nations and WHO’s sister agencies. By March, over 80% of USAID programs had been shuttered, punching a $60 billion hole in global aid budgets. This broader retreat from international commitments has left organisations like the UN Refugee Agency and Office for Humanitarian Affairs and non-governental humanitarian organisations scrambling for resources just as the WHO does the same, creating unprecedented competition for a dwindling pool of donor funds that no single government appears willing or able to replenish. In the latest sign of distress, top UN officials told staff at a town hall in New York City Tuesday that the organization is considering a 20% reduction across every secretariat under the UN umbrella for 2026 — from humanitarian affairs, to human rights, peacekeeping operations, and development programs — heightening the financial crisis in the world of international institutions and those who depend on them. Several major financial contributors to WHO, including Germany, France, and the EU delegation, pressed the agency to develop contingency plans for potential fundraising shortfalls as the UN system creaks under the weight of the US withdrawal. “Should the resources, the $1.65 billion, not materialise, the idea is that we will be in a position to actually scale back or ramp up,” said Raul Thomas, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for business operations who led the budget consultations with member states. “We never know – I’m the eternal optimist. Maybe we’ll get much more money than the 1.65 million. That’s the gap right now.” Presidents and Prime Ministers Celebrate the Passing of the Pandemic Agreement 20/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan WHO officials including the co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso (right) celebrate the World Health Assembly’s adoption of the pandemic agreement. Presidents, prime ministers and even opera singers, celebrated the unanimous adoption of the world’s first Pandemic Agreement by consensus at the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary on Tuesday morning. Despite the 11th-hour insistence of Slovakia on a vote on the agreement in Committee A on Monday night, none of the World Health Organization (WHO) member states obstructed the agreement’s adoption at the plenary. Instead, it was presented as a rare example of successful multilateral engagement in a world of heightened conflict. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço commended the WHO’s resilience in the face of “unfair and unjust criticism”, and pledged an additional $8 million from his country to the WHO. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço Speaking on behalf of the 55 AU member states, Lourenço said the continent is “united in supporting the proposal to increase assessed contributions” [membership fees] as “the WHO is the only institution with a universal mandate to protect global health and promote equity”. China’s Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong pledged an “additional quota of $500 million over five years” to the WHO, at the plenary, and urged all countries to “support the WHO to play a central coordinating role in global health governance” and enable it “to perform its duty in an independent, professional and science-based manner”. Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, also in the room, described the WHO as “a beacon of hope and a guardian of humanity’s right to health”. Plenković described sustainable financing of the WHO as “a strategic imperative” to enable “timely responses to emergencies and meaningful support where it is needed most”. Egyptian opera singer Farrah El-Dibany and soprano singers Elaine Vidal and Eunice Miller of the Philippines also performed for the assembly. Macron appeals to US scientists Emmanuel Macron addresses the WHA plenary in a recorded message. “Our first line of defence is the WHO,” said French President Emmanuel Macron in a recorded message. He then appealed to “all those researchers who want to freely continue to do their work” – a veiled reference to US scientists dismissed during US President Donald Trump’s massive budget cuts – to move to Europe. “We will be happy to welcome you in Europe, because that will be good for Europe, for medical research, for you and for everyone. It’s not a question of ‘if’ we will have a new pandemic. It’s a question of ‘when’ we’ll have it,” said Macron. South African and G20 President Cyril Ramaphosa, and the leaders of the Philippines, Peru, Mongolia and Senegal also sent recorded messages of support. The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a coherent global health architecture and described the pandemic agreement as “historic”. As one leader after another defended the WHO and multilateralism, Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO loomed as the elephant in the room – and the target of unspoken rebuke. So it was timely – but also surprising – that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr also sent a recorded message to the plenary. Unlike the other messages, however, Kennedy claimed that the WHO “has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest and international power politics”. “The WHO has not even come to terms with its failures during COVID, let alone made significant reforms. Instead, it has doubled down with the pandemic agreement, which will lock in all of the dysfunctions of the WHO pandemic response,” he added, without articulating any specific US objections to the agreement. ‘Eyes on the prize’ Namibian Health Minister and chair of Committee A, Dr Esperance Luvindao, Dr Tedros and Dr Mike Ryan applauding the vote on the pandemic agreement in Committee A on Monday night. Addressing the plenary after the leaders’ messages, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus paid tribute to those who negotiated the pandemic agreement. “You have engaged in very tough negotiations. Sometimes the disagreements were sharp, the discussions heated and the frustration evident. Sometimes it seemed the distance between you might be too great to overcome. But you kept your eyes on the prize, and did not stop until you had achieved it,” said Tedros, adding that sometimes delegates had talked all night in the windowless basement room of the WHO headquarters where the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) met. “The pandemic agreement has been negotiated by countries for countries, and will be implemented in countries in accordance with their own national laws,” stressed Tedros, referring to the “torrent of mis- and disinformation” that claimed the agreement will “infringe on national sovereignty” and give the WHO Secretariat “power to impose mask or vaccine mandates or lockdowns. “Today, you have sent a loud message that multilateralism not only works, but is the only way to find shared solutions to shared threats. Let’s not understate what you have achieved. You have made the world a safer place,” stressed Tedros. Pathogens ‘won’t wait’ The agreement was welcomed by the co-chairs of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, former President of Liberia, and Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand. “Consider this agreement a foundation from which to build, starting today,” said Clark. “Many gaps remain in finance, equitable access to medical countermeasures and in understanding evolving risks. Don’t wait to get started. Dangerous pathogens are looming, and they certainly will not wait. The Third World Network said that the “next phases of negotiations, beginning with the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), will determine whether this agreement becomes a meaningful tool for equity or if it remains merely symbolic”. “At stake is the ability of developing countries to access affordable vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics swiftly and fairly during health emergencies and to realize the ambition of a fairer and more effective global health architecture that can equitably prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics,” said TWN. Dr David Reddy, director-general of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), said that, as the next level of detail of the agreement is worked through, it is essential that the experience of pharmaceutical companies is drawn upon “so that their expertise can be mobilized when needed”. This includes how the PABS will work “where we must make sure that companies are able to access the pathogens and sequence information as quickly as possible to undertake scientific research and avoid unnecessary conditions that make it harder for companies to do so”, Reddy stressed. He added that “intellectual property protections that are essential for pharmaceutical companies to invest in high-risk R&D, must not be eroded and instead should enable partnerships on voluntary and mutually agreed terms, in a way that draws on the expertise and networks of each company.” ‘US is not indispensible’ Public Citizen Access to Medicines Director Peter Maybarduk said that “WHO member states chose health and justice today, despite RFK’s cheap insult, the reckless US withdrawal and Trump’s deadly neglect of infectious disease threats. “The world moved forward without the US today. Trump’s devastating cuts cast a shadow on the talks, and are on course to cost millions of lives, including the lives of Americans made more vulnerable to infectious disease,” said Maybarduk. “Still, countries came together amidst scarcity to commit themselves to a more just and healthy world, and that is worth celebrating.” Matthew Kavanagh, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Global Health Policy and Politics, said that the US “did not show up for the final negotiations but it turns out the US is not indispensable and, in fact, perhaps not having the US engaged is what enabled more cooperation.” “With the current administration seemingly intent on dismantling global public health efforts, it may be the best case scenario if the rest of the world can come together. In that way, this new agreement is a spot of light in and otherwise dark geopolitical environment for fighting pandemics,” Kavanagh told Health Policy Watch. Image Credits: WHO. Can Technology Tame the NCD Crisis? Experts Call for Smarter, Inclusive Digital Health Solutions 20/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman Digital blood pressure monitoring devices have now become widely available The pace of technological change today is nothing short of revolutionary, according to Dr Douglas Bettcher, Senior Advisor in the Director-General’s Office at the World Health Organization (WHO). “I think we find ourselves very strangely in the last couple of years, in what seems to be a really brave new world, brave new reality,” he told attendees at Monday’s Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF) event, which focused on how digital innovations could help prevent and manage noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). “A case can be made that this communications revolution is even greater and more mind-boggling than what we’ve seen in the past,” Bettcher continued. “Even some pundits in the know compare this to the 19th-century industrial revolution. And what must be clear to us, being confronted with these very, very rapid changes, is that we in the public health community cannot be left standing during this digital innovation, this mass revolution.” Bettcher, who discussed WHO’s Be He@lthy, Be Mobile (BHBM) program, stressed that the train has already left the station. Industries that harm health are already leveraging artificial intelligence and related technologies. Now, he said, it’s time for those working to improve health to use them too. The Monday event—hosted as a side event of the 78th World Health Assembly—was a collaboration between GSCF, WHO, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Titled “Empowering Self-Care: Digital Innovations for NCD Prevention and Management,” it highlighted the vital role of self-care and digital technology in tackling NCDs, emphasizing cross-sector collaboration. Keynote addresses were given by H.E. Honourable Tuafafa Latasi, a member of the Tuvalu parliament, and Dr Dympna Kavanagh, the Chief Dental Officer of Ireland’s Department of Health. “Digital innovation has the power to transform healthcare and how we look after ourselves,” said moderator Shiulie Ghosh. “That is the role of digital innovation in preventing and managing some of the biggest causes of death across the globe.” She emphasized that digital tools can improve access to self-care and empower individuals living with NCDs to monitor and manage their conditions effectively. GSCF Director-General Greg Perry added, “We are at a pivotal moment in NCDs,” referring to WHO’s release last week of the zero draft of the political declaration on NCDs and mental health. The draft was published in preparation for the upcoming High-Level Meeting on September 25. Greg Perry (center) The declaration outlines proposed global targets for 2030: 150 million fewer people using tobacco 150 million more people managing their hypertension 150 million more people gaining access to mental health care The 10-page draft includes a set of five sub-targets, offering a roadmap for reaching these ambitious goals. “Digital tools can play a very, very important part,” Perry told the audience. “When we talk about self-care, we’re not just about keeping fit, eating correctly, or even brushing our teeth. We’re talking about the necessary tools for people to self-care.” These tools may include medicines and digital applications from the industry’s perspective. “If you add AI and digital applications together with the current and future self-care tools that are available and will be available, we are on the verge of almost a self-care revolution,” Perry said. “These [tools] will be accessible, they’ll be self-managed, and they will have a very high impact.” Making digital self-care tools useful and trusted One key challenge with emerging digital self-care tools is the lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into people’s daily lives. Luis Lourenço of the International Pharmaceutical Federation noted that pharmacists are often the first point of contact when individuals seek advice or support related to digital tools. “When you talk about the impact of digital tools on primary health care, you can focus on four major areas: prevention, health literacy, diagnosis, and the management of a chronic disease,” Lourenço said. He added that health literacy is often one of the most complicated aspects. While having access to information is essential, Lourenço emphasized that it’s not enough. People also need to understand the information and apply it in their routines. “What’s the point of having information about your blood pressure if you don’t understand what it means or when to incorporate it?” he asked. “What we have today is a lot of access to information, but people rely a lot, mostly on their healthcare partners, healthcare professionals, and pharmacists.” Without that support, he said, people may have information but not know how to use it effectively. Lourenço also pointed out that people want to be sure the tools they use are evidence-based and trustworthy. However, Debbie Rogers, CEO of Reach Digital Health, offered a slightly different perspective, suggesting that if digital tools provide enough value, people will ultimately trust them. Addressing accessibility, accountability, and inclusion Another key challenge is user hesitation, particularly among specific populations, about whether they want to use digital tools at all. “On one hand, we have developed countries. We have higher literacy levels. We have digital-savvy sort of people,” explained Hussain Jafri of the World Patient Alliance. “They are using [digital tools] and giving us very good results. But then you look at the other populations—at the lower- and middle-income countries and the elderly population, the people who are not tech-savvy. They are not really using them.” Jafri shared that he once downloaded an app designed for people with pre-diabetes but found it too complicated and deleted it after only a few days. Experts said encouraging adoption also depends on better integration of these tools into healthcare systems, where people feel accountable for the data they enter. Lourenço noted that if patients knew their doctors were reviewing the data collected in an app, it would likely motivate them to use the tool more consistently. Jafri stressed that companies developing digital health technologies must involve users, patients, and providers early in the design process, rather than waiting until products are already on the market. “I think they also need to take into account our input—the input of the people who are going to use [the tools] should also be there while they’re developing these products, so that, you know, once it is out there, people are happy using it,” he said. Language accessibility is another barrier. Jafri emphasized the importance of localization. “These [tools] need to be in multiple languages, not just English,” he said, adding that companies should also provide training for providers and patients to ensure successful adoption. Empowering mothers through technology: South African case study A pregnant woman in Africa (illustrative) There are already promising examples of how digital health tools are making a difference, as illustrated by Rogers of Reach Digital Health. She shared a case from South Africa, where hypertension during pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. “We have a program called MomConnect, where every mother who comes into the clinic can sign up to receive messaging throughout her pregnancy and until her baby is two years old,” Rogers explained. The mothers receive both information and behavior-change tips. They can also ask questions and provide feedback to the system. Because hypertension is such a critical issue, the National Department of Health wanted to better understand the root causes. They started by asking mothers about their experience during their first antenatal visit: Did they have their blood pressure taken? Were they told what the results were? If so, were they prescribed the appropriate medication? “It was important to understand that patient journey, understand where the challenges were, and to do this at a national scale,” Rogers said. Based on the insights gathered, the department introduced targeted training for healthcare workers. This effort helped drive increased demand for quality care from the patients themselves. “We got mothers to go back to their clinic and say, ‘You didn’t take my blood pressure last time. I want you to take my blood pressure,’ or ‘you didn’t put me on the right medication.'” Rogers concluded that this initiative “shows the power of being able to empower people, both with information and behavior change, communication knowledge, so they knew what they had to ask for and what they were looking out for.” Carl Massonneau, Technical Officer for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research for the WHO, speaking from the audience, explained that another tool recently released by the World Health Organization is the Digital Adaptation Kit for Antenatal Care. The kit translates WHO recommendations into machine-readable formats, making integrating them into digital health systems easier. Carl Massonneau of the WHO One specific feature of the kit is a tool for self-monitoring blood pressure among pregnant women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders. That tool will be released next week. “It’s the first time we’re putting a step in this world and trying to provide standards to improve the quality of digital health interventions we have,” Massonneau said. He acknowledged that although a growing number of digital technologies are available, there are still major challenges in ensuring they are evidence-based, equitable, and accessible. Integrating Digital Tools Into Broader NCD Strategies As the conversation around digital health tools evolves, experts caution that no single solution will address the full complexity of noncommunicable diseases. Lourenço noted that while some aspects of NCDs fall under primary prevention, where individuals can be empowered to make healthier choices, others require more structured support. He said that strategic outreach, including digital media, can help move people from “pre-contemplation to contemplation,” encouraging them to recognize risks, develop motivation, and ultimately commit to change. However, he emphasized that many behaviors tied to NCDs cannot be addressed through self-care alone. These require ongoing guidance and system-level support. Effective management, Lourenço said, demands full integration within a broader framework—” at the policy level, at the health system level, [and] at the community level.” In this context, digital innovation is not a silver bullet but a key part of a larger ecosystem—one that must be built with intentional design, inclusive access, and cross-sector collaboration to truly transform outcomes in global health. Image Credits: Marco Verch/Flickr , Provided by Global Self-Care Foundation, Elizabeth Poll/MMV, Elaine Fletcher. Country After Country Endorse Pandemic Agreement in Enormous Show of Support 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Countries indicating their wish to speak about the pandemic agreement in Committee A An enormous list of World Health Organization (WHO) member states, 173 in all, lined up to speak in favour of the pandemic agreement at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on Monday – an extraordinary demonstration of the breadth of support for the document. By the end yesterday’s meeting of Committee A, member states passed the pandemic agreement resolution by vote not consensus – at the insistence of Slovakia – with 124 in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. The WHA plenary is due to consider the resolution on Tuesday. But between the cheers were reminders that the talks are not yet done. An annex still needs to be negotiated to establish the mechanisms for a pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) system – the most controversial aspect of the three-year talks. The PABS system will develop a mechanism for how countries that share information about pathogens with pandemic potential may benefit if pharmaceutical products are developed as a result. “As a country that has shared its pathogens, often without equitable returns, the PABS system is paramount in rectifying these imbalances and ensuring the realisation of genuine equity and equitable access,” said South African Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, speaking for the Africa region in Committee A, where the document was being discussed. The Africa region sees the target of 20% of pandemic products being reserved for the WHO for distribution to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by manufacturers participating in PABS, with at least 10% as a donation, during future pandemics, as a “positive first step”, added Motsoaledi. Speaker after speaker urged countries to maintain their political commitment to the PABS negotiations and reach an agreement on the annex before next year’s WHA. Even Hungary, a staunch ally of United States President Donald Trump, welcomed the agreement – and stressed that it did not infringe on countries’ sovereignty, a key claim of disinformation about the pandemic. Trump distanced the US from the pandemic agreement at the outset of his presidency in January, and many of his MAGA supporters claim it is a “power grab” by the WHO. Iran and Paraguay said they could not support the current pandemic agreement draft – reserving support until after the PABS negotiations. Meanwhile, Slovakia, which is led by Prime Minister Robert Fico who has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccines, demanded that the agreement be put to a vote during the committee session. Delegates at WHA’s Committee A after it adopted the pandemic agreeemnt by vote First ‘One Health’ agreement Germany said it “would have welcomed stronger provisions, particularly regarding prevention,” but “recognise this agreement as a critical and timely step toward global solidarity and multilateralism”. “We urge all member states to engage in the upcoming annex negotiations with the same political will and unity that have brought us this far. Let us continue to invest in international cooperation and global solidarity, not only to protect our citizens, but also to lay the groundwork that future generations can benefit from,” said Germany. Switzerland, which has sought to protect its pharmaceutical sector during talks, said it supports “a pragmatic, voluntary approach within existing frameworks, that take into account the advice and contributions from experts”. The European Union said that the agreement “marks an important accomplishment for global health security and cooperation” and “can bolster country capacities to prevent and prepare for pandemics using the One Health approach”. Ireland added that “the commitment to [pandemic] prevention through a One Health approach is the first of its kind to recognise the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health in our response to emerging health trends”. “The establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network and a pathogen access and benefit sharing system will ensure that the response to future health threats will be faster, more effective and more equitable,” it added. China said the agreement “will contribute to the fair distribution of health products, relevant technologies and resources to help developing countries enhance their capacities for prevention, preparedness and response” – but that it needed “some follow-up mechanisms, as well as sustained investment and capacity building efforts from all countries” to be effective. Kazakhstan said that “this is not just a global legal document. It is our collective response to a future where everybody will be protected, regardless of their economic position or status. We must underscore that the success outcome will be defined not only by its content, but also by its ability the state’s ability to implement it.” Jamaica, speaking for 22 countries in the Americas and Caribbean (excluding the USA), said the region was ready to do the work to finish the pandemic agreement. “We remember too vividly the oxygen shortages, the overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare workers, and over seven million lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jamaica. “For the Americas, this agreement means stronger commitments to regional manufacturing capacity, coordinated surveillance, research and development and transfer of technology, especially for developing countries.” ‘The worst of times’ INB co-chairs Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso Co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), South Africa’s Precious Matsoso and French Ambassador for Global Health Anne-Claire Amprou, also addressed the session, expressing appreciation to member states for their commitment. Matsoso reminded the WHA that the special assembly called to establish the INB was convened “at a time when we all wore masks, we practised social distancing, and we had face-to-face meetings that were highly restricted”. “It was the worst of times, the season of despair, of tragic losses, immeasurable devastation – all associated with COVID-19,” said Matsoso. She praised delegates for working through “13 formal rounds of negotiations, many of them extended, producing various iterations of draft pandemic agreement and proposals that have culminated into what we have before us as a consensus draft”. Amprou, who took over as co-chair from Roland Driece of the Netherlands in July 2024, said that the process involved “three years of dialogue, of compromise, of debates, of sleepless nights, but above all, three years guided by a common conviction that health is a common good”. “The COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for us all. It was a brutal reminder of the fact that viruses know no borders. No country, however powerful, can address a global health crisis on its own,” said Amprou. Meanwhile, former co-chair Driece spoke for the Netherlands, expressed his appreciation that the long process had resulted in an agreement. Image Credits: WHO. Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Nations Approve WHO Membership Fee Increase as US Exit Squeezes Budget 20/05/2025 Stefan Anderson Delegates gathered on Tuesday at the World Health Assembly agreed a new WHO budget for the 2026–2027 period which included a rise in membership fees. Photo WHO/Pierre Albouy. Nations at the 78th World Health Assembly approved a new budget and a 20% increase in annual membership fees for the World Health Organisation (WHO), handing the embattled UN health agency a crucial lifeline as it grapples with the financial bomb dropped on Geneva by the United States’ withdrawal from international institutions. The vote marks the second consecutive 20% hike in membership dues in as many budgets, which the agency’s member states approve on a biennial basis, the last coming in 2024. The move is part of a long-term plan to boost mandatory contributions from 16% of WHO’s core budget at the start of the decade to 50% by 2030 to reduce its dependence on the whims of major donors like the now-departed US. These membership fees provide the organization with flexible funding it can allocate according to its own priorities, unlike the voluntary contributions that typically come strictly earmarked by donors for specific programmes that have historically made up the vast majority of the WHO’s budget. Under the new budget, assessed contributions will make up 40% of the WHO’s base program budget of $4.2 billion for the 2026-27 period. The core budget does not include emergency humanitarian appeals or polio programmes, which bring the total budget target up to $6.2 billion. The fee increase, initially mandated in a 2022 resolution at the WHO’s executive assembly, faced an uncertain path to approval on Tuesday, with member nations engaging in tense pre-vote debates over the fairness of regional funding cuts in the new budget – which will run for two years starting in 2026 – and demands for greater transparency in expenditure tracking. Projected financing for the base programmes segment of the budget for 2026–2027, compared to previous bienniums, in US$ million. A battle of buzzwords played out during the proceedings: supporters of the fee increase championed “flexible, predictable, sustainable and agile” funding, while skeptics countered with demands for “efficiency,” “transparency,” elimination of “redundancy” and “cost-effectiveness” – signaling clearly that the WHO’s financial reprieve comes with strings and expectations attached. WHO officials had acknowledged in the budget document they were “cognizant that such an increase will not be automatically granted” amid overlapping global crises straining national budgets worldwide. In the end, a collective recognition of the existential financial threat facing the agency carried the budget over the line. The chamber fell silent during the vote, with no objections raised. “There is a crisis,” WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared following the vote. “But we will use this crisis as an opportunity and make sure our organisation emerges sharper and more empowered.” Germany’s delegation, the WHO’s most important financial backer since the American departure, hailed the decision as “historic” — but not before voicing their support in song. “I tell you what I want, what I really, really want,” the German representative sang in an awkward rendition of the Spice Girls hit befitting the oft-lively proceedings of Committee A, “and that is that we all indeed are serious about functioning and effective multilateralism.” “The increase is the best vaccination against the highest financial risk that WHO faces,” he added, “its dependency on a very few donors, and the discrepancy between the expectations we all put on the organisation and its ability to fulfil them.” Financial triage Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. The agency has been in financial triage mode since the US exit announcement in November, implementing drastic budget reductions to secure votes that earned praise from member states for its “budgetary realism.” Before the US departure, the 2026-27 budget required to fulfill WHO’s core mission was projected at $5.3 billion over the two year period. Following Tuesday’s vote, the target plummeted to $4.2 billion, a 22% cut that will impact the agency’s operations worldwide. The revised budget represents a $700 million decrease from projections presented at WHO’s January executive board meeting, but even this diminished figure approved in Geneva remains aspirational. Level of projected financing for the base programmes segment of the Proposed programme budget 2026–2027, US$ million. While WHO secured an additional $170 million toward its 2026-27 budget Tuesday evening following major commitments of $50 million a year from China and first-time donors Mongolia and Cambodia, among others, the agency still faces a $1.5 billion funding shortfall on top of the $1.1 billion decrease from previous budget projections. The two new donor nations join 42 additional first-time voluntary contributors to WHO, including seven low-income and 28 lower-middle and upper-middle income countries. “With the exception of the headquarters and the European region, the allocated or proposed budget for every regional office is currently higher, even after the reduction, than the projected implementation,” explained Imre Hollo, director of strategic planning and budget at WHO. Without additional contributions, further life-threatening program cuts loom. All of the WHO’s six regions face significant cuts heading into the 2026-27 period covered by the budget. Regional office budgets are set to fall by 14%, with the African region facing the largest total cut of $153 million year-on-year. The agency’s Geneva headquarters will lose nearly a quarter of its annual funding. China announced it will contribute $500 million to the WHO over the next five-year period, though it was unclear whether this includes the 20% increase in its fee contributions. This will make China, for the first time, the largest fee payer in the WHO, supplanting the US as it exits. “We can only implement the budget if we have the financing,” Hollo said, noting the “personal sacrifice” that member states will need to make should the funding target remain unmet. More freedom, less money WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Raul Thomas, the Assistant Director-General for Business Operations at WHO address the committee following the successful vote. The WHO’s budget victory comes amid a zero-sum competition for international aid dollars, with UN agencies and humanitarian organisations worldwide scrambling to fill gaps left by America’s retreat from global commitments. Since January, the White House has systematically dismantled the US Agency for International Development (USAID) – historically the world’s largest humanitarian donor – while slashing support for the United Nations and WHO’s sister agencies. By March, over 80% of USAID programs had been shuttered, punching a $60 billion hole in global aid budgets. This broader retreat from international commitments has left organisations like the UN Refugee Agency and Office for Humanitarian Affairs and non-governental humanitarian organisations scrambling for resources just as the WHO does the same, creating unprecedented competition for a dwindling pool of donor funds that no single government appears willing or able to replenish. In the latest sign of distress, top UN officials told staff at a town hall in New York City Tuesday that the organization is considering a 20% reduction across every secretariat under the UN umbrella for 2026 — from humanitarian affairs, to human rights, peacekeeping operations, and development programs — heightening the financial crisis in the world of international institutions and those who depend on them. Several major financial contributors to WHO, including Germany, France, and the EU delegation, pressed the agency to develop contingency plans for potential fundraising shortfalls as the UN system creaks under the weight of the US withdrawal. “Should the resources, the $1.65 billion, not materialise, the idea is that we will be in a position to actually scale back or ramp up,” said Raul Thomas, WHO’s Assistant Director-General for business operations who led the budget consultations with member states. “We never know – I’m the eternal optimist. Maybe we’ll get much more money than the 1.65 million. That’s the gap right now.” Presidents and Prime Ministers Celebrate the Passing of the Pandemic Agreement 20/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan WHO officials including the co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso (right) celebrate the World Health Assembly’s adoption of the pandemic agreement. Presidents, prime ministers and even opera singers, celebrated the unanimous adoption of the world’s first Pandemic Agreement by consensus at the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary on Tuesday morning. Despite the 11th-hour insistence of Slovakia on a vote on the agreement in Committee A on Monday night, none of the World Health Organization (WHO) member states obstructed the agreement’s adoption at the plenary. Instead, it was presented as a rare example of successful multilateral engagement in a world of heightened conflict. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço commended the WHO’s resilience in the face of “unfair and unjust criticism”, and pledged an additional $8 million from his country to the WHO. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço Speaking on behalf of the 55 AU member states, Lourenço said the continent is “united in supporting the proposal to increase assessed contributions” [membership fees] as “the WHO is the only institution with a universal mandate to protect global health and promote equity”. China’s Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong pledged an “additional quota of $500 million over five years” to the WHO, at the plenary, and urged all countries to “support the WHO to play a central coordinating role in global health governance” and enable it “to perform its duty in an independent, professional and science-based manner”. Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, also in the room, described the WHO as “a beacon of hope and a guardian of humanity’s right to health”. Plenković described sustainable financing of the WHO as “a strategic imperative” to enable “timely responses to emergencies and meaningful support where it is needed most”. Egyptian opera singer Farrah El-Dibany and soprano singers Elaine Vidal and Eunice Miller of the Philippines also performed for the assembly. Macron appeals to US scientists Emmanuel Macron addresses the WHA plenary in a recorded message. “Our first line of defence is the WHO,” said French President Emmanuel Macron in a recorded message. He then appealed to “all those researchers who want to freely continue to do their work” – a veiled reference to US scientists dismissed during US President Donald Trump’s massive budget cuts – to move to Europe. “We will be happy to welcome you in Europe, because that will be good for Europe, for medical research, for you and for everyone. It’s not a question of ‘if’ we will have a new pandemic. It’s a question of ‘when’ we’ll have it,” said Macron. South African and G20 President Cyril Ramaphosa, and the leaders of the Philippines, Peru, Mongolia and Senegal also sent recorded messages of support. The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a coherent global health architecture and described the pandemic agreement as “historic”. As one leader after another defended the WHO and multilateralism, Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO loomed as the elephant in the room – and the target of unspoken rebuke. So it was timely – but also surprising – that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr also sent a recorded message to the plenary. Unlike the other messages, however, Kennedy claimed that the WHO “has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest and international power politics”. “The WHO has not even come to terms with its failures during COVID, let alone made significant reforms. Instead, it has doubled down with the pandemic agreement, which will lock in all of the dysfunctions of the WHO pandemic response,” he added, without articulating any specific US objections to the agreement. ‘Eyes on the prize’ Namibian Health Minister and chair of Committee A, Dr Esperance Luvindao, Dr Tedros and Dr Mike Ryan applauding the vote on the pandemic agreement in Committee A on Monday night. Addressing the plenary after the leaders’ messages, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus paid tribute to those who negotiated the pandemic agreement. “You have engaged in very tough negotiations. Sometimes the disagreements were sharp, the discussions heated and the frustration evident. Sometimes it seemed the distance between you might be too great to overcome. But you kept your eyes on the prize, and did not stop until you had achieved it,” said Tedros, adding that sometimes delegates had talked all night in the windowless basement room of the WHO headquarters where the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) met. “The pandemic agreement has been negotiated by countries for countries, and will be implemented in countries in accordance with their own national laws,” stressed Tedros, referring to the “torrent of mis- and disinformation” that claimed the agreement will “infringe on national sovereignty” and give the WHO Secretariat “power to impose mask or vaccine mandates or lockdowns. “Today, you have sent a loud message that multilateralism not only works, but is the only way to find shared solutions to shared threats. Let’s not understate what you have achieved. You have made the world a safer place,” stressed Tedros. Pathogens ‘won’t wait’ The agreement was welcomed by the co-chairs of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, former President of Liberia, and Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand. “Consider this agreement a foundation from which to build, starting today,” said Clark. “Many gaps remain in finance, equitable access to medical countermeasures and in understanding evolving risks. Don’t wait to get started. Dangerous pathogens are looming, and they certainly will not wait. The Third World Network said that the “next phases of negotiations, beginning with the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), will determine whether this agreement becomes a meaningful tool for equity or if it remains merely symbolic”. “At stake is the ability of developing countries to access affordable vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics swiftly and fairly during health emergencies and to realize the ambition of a fairer and more effective global health architecture that can equitably prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics,” said TWN. Dr David Reddy, director-general of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), said that, as the next level of detail of the agreement is worked through, it is essential that the experience of pharmaceutical companies is drawn upon “so that their expertise can be mobilized when needed”. This includes how the PABS will work “where we must make sure that companies are able to access the pathogens and sequence information as quickly as possible to undertake scientific research and avoid unnecessary conditions that make it harder for companies to do so”, Reddy stressed. He added that “intellectual property protections that are essential for pharmaceutical companies to invest in high-risk R&D, must not be eroded and instead should enable partnerships on voluntary and mutually agreed terms, in a way that draws on the expertise and networks of each company.” ‘US is not indispensible’ Public Citizen Access to Medicines Director Peter Maybarduk said that “WHO member states chose health and justice today, despite RFK’s cheap insult, the reckless US withdrawal and Trump’s deadly neglect of infectious disease threats. “The world moved forward without the US today. Trump’s devastating cuts cast a shadow on the talks, and are on course to cost millions of lives, including the lives of Americans made more vulnerable to infectious disease,” said Maybarduk. “Still, countries came together amidst scarcity to commit themselves to a more just and healthy world, and that is worth celebrating.” Matthew Kavanagh, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Global Health Policy and Politics, said that the US “did not show up for the final negotiations but it turns out the US is not indispensable and, in fact, perhaps not having the US engaged is what enabled more cooperation.” “With the current administration seemingly intent on dismantling global public health efforts, it may be the best case scenario if the rest of the world can come together. In that way, this new agreement is a spot of light in and otherwise dark geopolitical environment for fighting pandemics,” Kavanagh told Health Policy Watch. Image Credits: WHO. Can Technology Tame the NCD Crisis? Experts Call for Smarter, Inclusive Digital Health Solutions 20/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman Digital blood pressure monitoring devices have now become widely available The pace of technological change today is nothing short of revolutionary, according to Dr Douglas Bettcher, Senior Advisor in the Director-General’s Office at the World Health Organization (WHO). “I think we find ourselves very strangely in the last couple of years, in what seems to be a really brave new world, brave new reality,” he told attendees at Monday’s Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF) event, which focused on how digital innovations could help prevent and manage noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). “A case can be made that this communications revolution is even greater and more mind-boggling than what we’ve seen in the past,” Bettcher continued. “Even some pundits in the know compare this to the 19th-century industrial revolution. And what must be clear to us, being confronted with these very, very rapid changes, is that we in the public health community cannot be left standing during this digital innovation, this mass revolution.” Bettcher, who discussed WHO’s Be He@lthy, Be Mobile (BHBM) program, stressed that the train has already left the station. Industries that harm health are already leveraging artificial intelligence and related technologies. Now, he said, it’s time for those working to improve health to use them too. The Monday event—hosted as a side event of the 78th World Health Assembly—was a collaboration between GSCF, WHO, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Titled “Empowering Self-Care: Digital Innovations for NCD Prevention and Management,” it highlighted the vital role of self-care and digital technology in tackling NCDs, emphasizing cross-sector collaboration. Keynote addresses were given by H.E. Honourable Tuafafa Latasi, a member of the Tuvalu parliament, and Dr Dympna Kavanagh, the Chief Dental Officer of Ireland’s Department of Health. “Digital innovation has the power to transform healthcare and how we look after ourselves,” said moderator Shiulie Ghosh. “That is the role of digital innovation in preventing and managing some of the biggest causes of death across the globe.” She emphasized that digital tools can improve access to self-care and empower individuals living with NCDs to monitor and manage their conditions effectively. GSCF Director-General Greg Perry added, “We are at a pivotal moment in NCDs,” referring to WHO’s release last week of the zero draft of the political declaration on NCDs and mental health. The draft was published in preparation for the upcoming High-Level Meeting on September 25. Greg Perry (center) The declaration outlines proposed global targets for 2030: 150 million fewer people using tobacco 150 million more people managing their hypertension 150 million more people gaining access to mental health care The 10-page draft includes a set of five sub-targets, offering a roadmap for reaching these ambitious goals. “Digital tools can play a very, very important part,” Perry told the audience. “When we talk about self-care, we’re not just about keeping fit, eating correctly, or even brushing our teeth. We’re talking about the necessary tools for people to self-care.” These tools may include medicines and digital applications from the industry’s perspective. “If you add AI and digital applications together with the current and future self-care tools that are available and will be available, we are on the verge of almost a self-care revolution,” Perry said. “These [tools] will be accessible, they’ll be self-managed, and they will have a very high impact.” Making digital self-care tools useful and trusted One key challenge with emerging digital self-care tools is the lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into people’s daily lives. Luis Lourenço of the International Pharmaceutical Federation noted that pharmacists are often the first point of contact when individuals seek advice or support related to digital tools. “When you talk about the impact of digital tools on primary health care, you can focus on four major areas: prevention, health literacy, diagnosis, and the management of a chronic disease,” Lourenço said. He added that health literacy is often one of the most complicated aspects. While having access to information is essential, Lourenço emphasized that it’s not enough. People also need to understand the information and apply it in their routines. “What’s the point of having information about your blood pressure if you don’t understand what it means or when to incorporate it?” he asked. “What we have today is a lot of access to information, but people rely a lot, mostly on their healthcare partners, healthcare professionals, and pharmacists.” Without that support, he said, people may have information but not know how to use it effectively. Lourenço also pointed out that people want to be sure the tools they use are evidence-based and trustworthy. However, Debbie Rogers, CEO of Reach Digital Health, offered a slightly different perspective, suggesting that if digital tools provide enough value, people will ultimately trust them. Addressing accessibility, accountability, and inclusion Another key challenge is user hesitation, particularly among specific populations, about whether they want to use digital tools at all. “On one hand, we have developed countries. We have higher literacy levels. We have digital-savvy sort of people,” explained Hussain Jafri of the World Patient Alliance. “They are using [digital tools] and giving us very good results. But then you look at the other populations—at the lower- and middle-income countries and the elderly population, the people who are not tech-savvy. They are not really using them.” Jafri shared that he once downloaded an app designed for people with pre-diabetes but found it too complicated and deleted it after only a few days. Experts said encouraging adoption also depends on better integration of these tools into healthcare systems, where people feel accountable for the data they enter. Lourenço noted that if patients knew their doctors were reviewing the data collected in an app, it would likely motivate them to use the tool more consistently. Jafri stressed that companies developing digital health technologies must involve users, patients, and providers early in the design process, rather than waiting until products are already on the market. “I think they also need to take into account our input—the input of the people who are going to use [the tools] should also be there while they’re developing these products, so that, you know, once it is out there, people are happy using it,” he said. Language accessibility is another barrier. Jafri emphasized the importance of localization. “These [tools] need to be in multiple languages, not just English,” he said, adding that companies should also provide training for providers and patients to ensure successful adoption. Empowering mothers through technology: South African case study A pregnant woman in Africa (illustrative) There are already promising examples of how digital health tools are making a difference, as illustrated by Rogers of Reach Digital Health. She shared a case from South Africa, where hypertension during pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. “We have a program called MomConnect, where every mother who comes into the clinic can sign up to receive messaging throughout her pregnancy and until her baby is two years old,” Rogers explained. The mothers receive both information and behavior-change tips. They can also ask questions and provide feedback to the system. Because hypertension is such a critical issue, the National Department of Health wanted to better understand the root causes. They started by asking mothers about their experience during their first antenatal visit: Did they have their blood pressure taken? Were they told what the results were? If so, were they prescribed the appropriate medication? “It was important to understand that patient journey, understand where the challenges were, and to do this at a national scale,” Rogers said. Based on the insights gathered, the department introduced targeted training for healthcare workers. This effort helped drive increased demand for quality care from the patients themselves. “We got mothers to go back to their clinic and say, ‘You didn’t take my blood pressure last time. I want you to take my blood pressure,’ or ‘you didn’t put me on the right medication.'” Rogers concluded that this initiative “shows the power of being able to empower people, both with information and behavior change, communication knowledge, so they knew what they had to ask for and what they were looking out for.” Carl Massonneau, Technical Officer for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research for the WHO, speaking from the audience, explained that another tool recently released by the World Health Organization is the Digital Adaptation Kit for Antenatal Care. The kit translates WHO recommendations into machine-readable formats, making integrating them into digital health systems easier. Carl Massonneau of the WHO One specific feature of the kit is a tool for self-monitoring blood pressure among pregnant women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders. That tool will be released next week. “It’s the first time we’re putting a step in this world and trying to provide standards to improve the quality of digital health interventions we have,” Massonneau said. He acknowledged that although a growing number of digital technologies are available, there are still major challenges in ensuring they are evidence-based, equitable, and accessible. Integrating Digital Tools Into Broader NCD Strategies As the conversation around digital health tools evolves, experts caution that no single solution will address the full complexity of noncommunicable diseases. Lourenço noted that while some aspects of NCDs fall under primary prevention, where individuals can be empowered to make healthier choices, others require more structured support. He said that strategic outreach, including digital media, can help move people from “pre-contemplation to contemplation,” encouraging them to recognize risks, develop motivation, and ultimately commit to change. However, he emphasized that many behaviors tied to NCDs cannot be addressed through self-care alone. These require ongoing guidance and system-level support. Effective management, Lourenço said, demands full integration within a broader framework—” at the policy level, at the health system level, [and] at the community level.” In this context, digital innovation is not a silver bullet but a key part of a larger ecosystem—one that must be built with intentional design, inclusive access, and cross-sector collaboration to truly transform outcomes in global health. Image Credits: Marco Verch/Flickr , Provided by Global Self-Care Foundation, Elizabeth Poll/MMV, Elaine Fletcher. Country After Country Endorse Pandemic Agreement in Enormous Show of Support 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Countries indicating their wish to speak about the pandemic agreement in Committee A An enormous list of World Health Organization (WHO) member states, 173 in all, lined up to speak in favour of the pandemic agreement at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on Monday – an extraordinary demonstration of the breadth of support for the document. By the end yesterday’s meeting of Committee A, member states passed the pandemic agreement resolution by vote not consensus – at the insistence of Slovakia – with 124 in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. The WHA plenary is due to consider the resolution on Tuesday. But between the cheers were reminders that the talks are not yet done. An annex still needs to be negotiated to establish the mechanisms for a pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) system – the most controversial aspect of the three-year talks. The PABS system will develop a mechanism for how countries that share information about pathogens with pandemic potential may benefit if pharmaceutical products are developed as a result. “As a country that has shared its pathogens, often without equitable returns, the PABS system is paramount in rectifying these imbalances and ensuring the realisation of genuine equity and equitable access,” said South African Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, speaking for the Africa region in Committee A, where the document was being discussed. The Africa region sees the target of 20% of pandemic products being reserved for the WHO for distribution to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by manufacturers participating in PABS, with at least 10% as a donation, during future pandemics, as a “positive first step”, added Motsoaledi. Speaker after speaker urged countries to maintain their political commitment to the PABS negotiations and reach an agreement on the annex before next year’s WHA. Even Hungary, a staunch ally of United States President Donald Trump, welcomed the agreement – and stressed that it did not infringe on countries’ sovereignty, a key claim of disinformation about the pandemic. Trump distanced the US from the pandemic agreement at the outset of his presidency in January, and many of his MAGA supporters claim it is a “power grab” by the WHO. Iran and Paraguay said they could not support the current pandemic agreement draft – reserving support until after the PABS negotiations. Meanwhile, Slovakia, which is led by Prime Minister Robert Fico who has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccines, demanded that the agreement be put to a vote during the committee session. Delegates at WHA’s Committee A after it adopted the pandemic agreeemnt by vote First ‘One Health’ agreement Germany said it “would have welcomed stronger provisions, particularly regarding prevention,” but “recognise this agreement as a critical and timely step toward global solidarity and multilateralism”. “We urge all member states to engage in the upcoming annex negotiations with the same political will and unity that have brought us this far. Let us continue to invest in international cooperation and global solidarity, not only to protect our citizens, but also to lay the groundwork that future generations can benefit from,” said Germany. Switzerland, which has sought to protect its pharmaceutical sector during talks, said it supports “a pragmatic, voluntary approach within existing frameworks, that take into account the advice and contributions from experts”. The European Union said that the agreement “marks an important accomplishment for global health security and cooperation” and “can bolster country capacities to prevent and prepare for pandemics using the One Health approach”. Ireland added that “the commitment to [pandemic] prevention through a One Health approach is the first of its kind to recognise the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health in our response to emerging health trends”. “The establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network and a pathogen access and benefit sharing system will ensure that the response to future health threats will be faster, more effective and more equitable,” it added. China said the agreement “will contribute to the fair distribution of health products, relevant technologies and resources to help developing countries enhance their capacities for prevention, preparedness and response” – but that it needed “some follow-up mechanisms, as well as sustained investment and capacity building efforts from all countries” to be effective. Kazakhstan said that “this is not just a global legal document. It is our collective response to a future where everybody will be protected, regardless of their economic position or status. We must underscore that the success outcome will be defined not only by its content, but also by its ability the state’s ability to implement it.” Jamaica, speaking for 22 countries in the Americas and Caribbean (excluding the USA), said the region was ready to do the work to finish the pandemic agreement. “We remember too vividly the oxygen shortages, the overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare workers, and over seven million lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jamaica. “For the Americas, this agreement means stronger commitments to regional manufacturing capacity, coordinated surveillance, research and development and transfer of technology, especially for developing countries.” ‘The worst of times’ INB co-chairs Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso Co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), South Africa’s Precious Matsoso and French Ambassador for Global Health Anne-Claire Amprou, also addressed the session, expressing appreciation to member states for their commitment. Matsoso reminded the WHA that the special assembly called to establish the INB was convened “at a time when we all wore masks, we practised social distancing, and we had face-to-face meetings that were highly restricted”. “It was the worst of times, the season of despair, of tragic losses, immeasurable devastation – all associated with COVID-19,” said Matsoso. She praised delegates for working through “13 formal rounds of negotiations, many of them extended, producing various iterations of draft pandemic agreement and proposals that have culminated into what we have before us as a consensus draft”. Amprou, who took over as co-chair from Roland Driece of the Netherlands in July 2024, said that the process involved “three years of dialogue, of compromise, of debates, of sleepless nights, but above all, three years guided by a common conviction that health is a common good”. “The COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for us all. It was a brutal reminder of the fact that viruses know no borders. No country, however powerful, can address a global health crisis on its own,” said Amprou. Meanwhile, former co-chair Driece spoke for the Netherlands, expressed his appreciation that the long process had resulted in an agreement. Image Credits: WHO. Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Presidents and Prime Ministers Celebrate the Passing of the Pandemic Agreement 20/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan WHO officials including the co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso (right) celebrate the World Health Assembly’s adoption of the pandemic agreement. Presidents, prime ministers and even opera singers, celebrated the unanimous adoption of the world’s first Pandemic Agreement by consensus at the World Health Assembly (WHA) plenary on Tuesday morning. Despite the 11th-hour insistence of Slovakia on a vote on the agreement in Committee A on Monday night, none of the World Health Organization (WHO) member states obstructed the agreement’s adoption at the plenary. Instead, it was presented as a rare example of successful multilateral engagement in a world of heightened conflict. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço commended the WHO’s resilience in the face of “unfair and unjust criticism”, and pledged an additional $8 million from his country to the WHO. Head of the African Union and Angolan President João Lourenço Speaking on behalf of the 55 AU member states, Lourenço said the continent is “united in supporting the proposal to increase assessed contributions” [membership fees] as “the WHO is the only institution with a universal mandate to protect global health and promote equity”. China’s Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong pledged an “additional quota of $500 million over five years” to the WHO, at the plenary, and urged all countries to “support the WHO to play a central coordinating role in global health governance” and enable it “to perform its duty in an independent, professional and science-based manner”. Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, also in the room, described the WHO as “a beacon of hope and a guardian of humanity’s right to health”. Plenković described sustainable financing of the WHO as “a strategic imperative” to enable “timely responses to emergencies and meaningful support where it is needed most”. Egyptian opera singer Farrah El-Dibany and soprano singers Elaine Vidal and Eunice Miller of the Philippines also performed for the assembly. Macron appeals to US scientists Emmanuel Macron addresses the WHA plenary in a recorded message. “Our first line of defence is the WHO,” said French President Emmanuel Macron in a recorded message. He then appealed to “all those researchers who want to freely continue to do their work” – a veiled reference to US scientists dismissed during US President Donald Trump’s massive budget cuts – to move to Europe. “We will be happy to welcome you in Europe, because that will be good for Europe, for medical research, for you and for everyone. It’s not a question of ‘if’ we will have a new pandemic. It’s a question of ‘when’ we’ll have it,” said Macron. South African and G20 President Cyril Ramaphosa, and the leaders of the Philippines, Peru, Mongolia and Senegal also sent recorded messages of support. The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a coherent global health architecture and described the pandemic agreement as “historic”. As one leader after another defended the WHO and multilateralism, Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO loomed as the elephant in the room – and the target of unspoken rebuke. So it was timely – but also surprising – that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr also sent a recorded message to the plenary. Unlike the other messages, however, Kennedy claimed that the WHO “has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest and international power politics”. “The WHO has not even come to terms with its failures during COVID, let alone made significant reforms. Instead, it has doubled down with the pandemic agreement, which will lock in all of the dysfunctions of the WHO pandemic response,” he added, without articulating any specific US objections to the agreement. ‘Eyes on the prize’ Namibian Health Minister and chair of Committee A, Dr Esperance Luvindao, Dr Tedros and Dr Mike Ryan applauding the vote on the pandemic agreement in Committee A on Monday night. Addressing the plenary after the leaders’ messages, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus paid tribute to those who negotiated the pandemic agreement. “You have engaged in very tough negotiations. Sometimes the disagreements were sharp, the discussions heated and the frustration evident. Sometimes it seemed the distance between you might be too great to overcome. But you kept your eyes on the prize, and did not stop until you had achieved it,” said Tedros, adding that sometimes delegates had talked all night in the windowless basement room of the WHO headquarters where the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) met. “The pandemic agreement has been negotiated by countries for countries, and will be implemented in countries in accordance with their own national laws,” stressed Tedros, referring to the “torrent of mis- and disinformation” that claimed the agreement will “infringe on national sovereignty” and give the WHO Secretariat “power to impose mask or vaccine mandates or lockdowns. “Today, you have sent a loud message that multilateralism not only works, but is the only way to find shared solutions to shared threats. Let’s not understate what you have achieved. You have made the world a safer place,” stressed Tedros. Pathogens ‘won’t wait’ The agreement was welcomed by the co-chairs of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, former President of Liberia, and Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand. “Consider this agreement a foundation from which to build, starting today,” said Clark. “Many gaps remain in finance, equitable access to medical countermeasures and in understanding evolving risks. Don’t wait to get started. Dangerous pathogens are looming, and they certainly will not wait. The Third World Network said that the “next phases of negotiations, beginning with the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), will determine whether this agreement becomes a meaningful tool for equity or if it remains merely symbolic”. “At stake is the ability of developing countries to access affordable vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics swiftly and fairly during health emergencies and to realize the ambition of a fairer and more effective global health architecture that can equitably prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics,” said TWN. Dr David Reddy, director-general of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), said that, as the next level of detail of the agreement is worked through, it is essential that the experience of pharmaceutical companies is drawn upon “so that their expertise can be mobilized when needed”. This includes how the PABS will work “where we must make sure that companies are able to access the pathogens and sequence information as quickly as possible to undertake scientific research and avoid unnecessary conditions that make it harder for companies to do so”, Reddy stressed. He added that “intellectual property protections that are essential for pharmaceutical companies to invest in high-risk R&D, must not be eroded and instead should enable partnerships on voluntary and mutually agreed terms, in a way that draws on the expertise and networks of each company.” ‘US is not indispensible’ Public Citizen Access to Medicines Director Peter Maybarduk said that “WHO member states chose health and justice today, despite RFK’s cheap insult, the reckless US withdrawal and Trump’s deadly neglect of infectious disease threats. “The world moved forward without the US today. Trump’s devastating cuts cast a shadow on the talks, and are on course to cost millions of lives, including the lives of Americans made more vulnerable to infectious disease,” said Maybarduk. “Still, countries came together amidst scarcity to commit themselves to a more just and healthy world, and that is worth celebrating.” Matthew Kavanagh, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Global Health Policy and Politics, said that the US “did not show up for the final negotiations but it turns out the US is not indispensable and, in fact, perhaps not having the US engaged is what enabled more cooperation.” “With the current administration seemingly intent on dismantling global public health efforts, it may be the best case scenario if the rest of the world can come together. In that way, this new agreement is a spot of light in and otherwise dark geopolitical environment for fighting pandemics,” Kavanagh told Health Policy Watch. Image Credits: WHO. Can Technology Tame the NCD Crisis? Experts Call for Smarter, Inclusive Digital Health Solutions 20/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman Digital blood pressure monitoring devices have now become widely available The pace of technological change today is nothing short of revolutionary, according to Dr Douglas Bettcher, Senior Advisor in the Director-General’s Office at the World Health Organization (WHO). “I think we find ourselves very strangely in the last couple of years, in what seems to be a really brave new world, brave new reality,” he told attendees at Monday’s Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF) event, which focused on how digital innovations could help prevent and manage noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). “A case can be made that this communications revolution is even greater and more mind-boggling than what we’ve seen in the past,” Bettcher continued. “Even some pundits in the know compare this to the 19th-century industrial revolution. And what must be clear to us, being confronted with these very, very rapid changes, is that we in the public health community cannot be left standing during this digital innovation, this mass revolution.” Bettcher, who discussed WHO’s Be He@lthy, Be Mobile (BHBM) program, stressed that the train has already left the station. Industries that harm health are already leveraging artificial intelligence and related technologies. Now, he said, it’s time for those working to improve health to use them too. The Monday event—hosted as a side event of the 78th World Health Assembly—was a collaboration between GSCF, WHO, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Titled “Empowering Self-Care: Digital Innovations for NCD Prevention and Management,” it highlighted the vital role of self-care and digital technology in tackling NCDs, emphasizing cross-sector collaboration. Keynote addresses were given by H.E. Honourable Tuafafa Latasi, a member of the Tuvalu parliament, and Dr Dympna Kavanagh, the Chief Dental Officer of Ireland’s Department of Health. “Digital innovation has the power to transform healthcare and how we look after ourselves,” said moderator Shiulie Ghosh. “That is the role of digital innovation in preventing and managing some of the biggest causes of death across the globe.” She emphasized that digital tools can improve access to self-care and empower individuals living with NCDs to monitor and manage their conditions effectively. GSCF Director-General Greg Perry added, “We are at a pivotal moment in NCDs,” referring to WHO’s release last week of the zero draft of the political declaration on NCDs and mental health. The draft was published in preparation for the upcoming High-Level Meeting on September 25. Greg Perry (center) The declaration outlines proposed global targets for 2030: 150 million fewer people using tobacco 150 million more people managing their hypertension 150 million more people gaining access to mental health care The 10-page draft includes a set of five sub-targets, offering a roadmap for reaching these ambitious goals. “Digital tools can play a very, very important part,” Perry told the audience. “When we talk about self-care, we’re not just about keeping fit, eating correctly, or even brushing our teeth. We’re talking about the necessary tools for people to self-care.” These tools may include medicines and digital applications from the industry’s perspective. “If you add AI and digital applications together with the current and future self-care tools that are available and will be available, we are on the verge of almost a self-care revolution,” Perry said. “These [tools] will be accessible, they’ll be self-managed, and they will have a very high impact.” Making digital self-care tools useful and trusted One key challenge with emerging digital self-care tools is the lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into people’s daily lives. Luis Lourenço of the International Pharmaceutical Federation noted that pharmacists are often the first point of contact when individuals seek advice or support related to digital tools. “When you talk about the impact of digital tools on primary health care, you can focus on four major areas: prevention, health literacy, diagnosis, and the management of a chronic disease,” Lourenço said. He added that health literacy is often one of the most complicated aspects. While having access to information is essential, Lourenço emphasized that it’s not enough. People also need to understand the information and apply it in their routines. “What’s the point of having information about your blood pressure if you don’t understand what it means or when to incorporate it?” he asked. “What we have today is a lot of access to information, but people rely a lot, mostly on their healthcare partners, healthcare professionals, and pharmacists.” Without that support, he said, people may have information but not know how to use it effectively. Lourenço also pointed out that people want to be sure the tools they use are evidence-based and trustworthy. However, Debbie Rogers, CEO of Reach Digital Health, offered a slightly different perspective, suggesting that if digital tools provide enough value, people will ultimately trust them. Addressing accessibility, accountability, and inclusion Another key challenge is user hesitation, particularly among specific populations, about whether they want to use digital tools at all. “On one hand, we have developed countries. We have higher literacy levels. We have digital-savvy sort of people,” explained Hussain Jafri of the World Patient Alliance. “They are using [digital tools] and giving us very good results. But then you look at the other populations—at the lower- and middle-income countries and the elderly population, the people who are not tech-savvy. They are not really using them.” Jafri shared that he once downloaded an app designed for people with pre-diabetes but found it too complicated and deleted it after only a few days. Experts said encouraging adoption also depends on better integration of these tools into healthcare systems, where people feel accountable for the data they enter. Lourenço noted that if patients knew their doctors were reviewing the data collected in an app, it would likely motivate them to use the tool more consistently. Jafri stressed that companies developing digital health technologies must involve users, patients, and providers early in the design process, rather than waiting until products are already on the market. “I think they also need to take into account our input—the input of the people who are going to use [the tools] should also be there while they’re developing these products, so that, you know, once it is out there, people are happy using it,” he said. Language accessibility is another barrier. Jafri emphasized the importance of localization. “These [tools] need to be in multiple languages, not just English,” he said, adding that companies should also provide training for providers and patients to ensure successful adoption. Empowering mothers through technology: South African case study A pregnant woman in Africa (illustrative) There are already promising examples of how digital health tools are making a difference, as illustrated by Rogers of Reach Digital Health. She shared a case from South Africa, where hypertension during pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. “We have a program called MomConnect, where every mother who comes into the clinic can sign up to receive messaging throughout her pregnancy and until her baby is two years old,” Rogers explained. The mothers receive both information and behavior-change tips. They can also ask questions and provide feedback to the system. Because hypertension is such a critical issue, the National Department of Health wanted to better understand the root causes. They started by asking mothers about their experience during their first antenatal visit: Did they have their blood pressure taken? Were they told what the results were? If so, were they prescribed the appropriate medication? “It was important to understand that patient journey, understand where the challenges were, and to do this at a national scale,” Rogers said. Based on the insights gathered, the department introduced targeted training for healthcare workers. This effort helped drive increased demand for quality care from the patients themselves. “We got mothers to go back to their clinic and say, ‘You didn’t take my blood pressure last time. I want you to take my blood pressure,’ or ‘you didn’t put me on the right medication.'” Rogers concluded that this initiative “shows the power of being able to empower people, both with information and behavior change, communication knowledge, so they knew what they had to ask for and what they were looking out for.” Carl Massonneau, Technical Officer for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research for the WHO, speaking from the audience, explained that another tool recently released by the World Health Organization is the Digital Adaptation Kit for Antenatal Care. The kit translates WHO recommendations into machine-readable formats, making integrating them into digital health systems easier. Carl Massonneau of the WHO One specific feature of the kit is a tool for self-monitoring blood pressure among pregnant women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders. That tool will be released next week. “It’s the first time we’re putting a step in this world and trying to provide standards to improve the quality of digital health interventions we have,” Massonneau said. He acknowledged that although a growing number of digital technologies are available, there are still major challenges in ensuring they are evidence-based, equitable, and accessible. Integrating Digital Tools Into Broader NCD Strategies As the conversation around digital health tools evolves, experts caution that no single solution will address the full complexity of noncommunicable diseases. Lourenço noted that while some aspects of NCDs fall under primary prevention, where individuals can be empowered to make healthier choices, others require more structured support. He said that strategic outreach, including digital media, can help move people from “pre-contemplation to contemplation,” encouraging them to recognize risks, develop motivation, and ultimately commit to change. However, he emphasized that many behaviors tied to NCDs cannot be addressed through self-care alone. These require ongoing guidance and system-level support. Effective management, Lourenço said, demands full integration within a broader framework—” at the policy level, at the health system level, [and] at the community level.” In this context, digital innovation is not a silver bullet but a key part of a larger ecosystem—one that must be built with intentional design, inclusive access, and cross-sector collaboration to truly transform outcomes in global health. Image Credits: Marco Verch/Flickr , Provided by Global Self-Care Foundation, Elizabeth Poll/MMV, Elaine Fletcher. Country After Country Endorse Pandemic Agreement in Enormous Show of Support 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Countries indicating their wish to speak about the pandemic agreement in Committee A An enormous list of World Health Organization (WHO) member states, 173 in all, lined up to speak in favour of the pandemic agreement at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on Monday – an extraordinary demonstration of the breadth of support for the document. By the end yesterday’s meeting of Committee A, member states passed the pandemic agreement resolution by vote not consensus – at the insistence of Slovakia – with 124 in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. The WHA plenary is due to consider the resolution on Tuesday. But between the cheers were reminders that the talks are not yet done. An annex still needs to be negotiated to establish the mechanisms for a pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) system – the most controversial aspect of the three-year talks. The PABS system will develop a mechanism for how countries that share information about pathogens with pandemic potential may benefit if pharmaceutical products are developed as a result. “As a country that has shared its pathogens, often without equitable returns, the PABS system is paramount in rectifying these imbalances and ensuring the realisation of genuine equity and equitable access,” said South African Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, speaking for the Africa region in Committee A, where the document was being discussed. The Africa region sees the target of 20% of pandemic products being reserved for the WHO for distribution to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by manufacturers participating in PABS, with at least 10% as a donation, during future pandemics, as a “positive first step”, added Motsoaledi. Speaker after speaker urged countries to maintain their political commitment to the PABS negotiations and reach an agreement on the annex before next year’s WHA. Even Hungary, a staunch ally of United States President Donald Trump, welcomed the agreement – and stressed that it did not infringe on countries’ sovereignty, a key claim of disinformation about the pandemic. Trump distanced the US from the pandemic agreement at the outset of his presidency in January, and many of his MAGA supporters claim it is a “power grab” by the WHO. Iran and Paraguay said they could not support the current pandemic agreement draft – reserving support until after the PABS negotiations. Meanwhile, Slovakia, which is led by Prime Minister Robert Fico who has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccines, demanded that the agreement be put to a vote during the committee session. Delegates at WHA’s Committee A after it adopted the pandemic agreeemnt by vote First ‘One Health’ agreement Germany said it “would have welcomed stronger provisions, particularly regarding prevention,” but “recognise this agreement as a critical and timely step toward global solidarity and multilateralism”. “We urge all member states to engage in the upcoming annex negotiations with the same political will and unity that have brought us this far. Let us continue to invest in international cooperation and global solidarity, not only to protect our citizens, but also to lay the groundwork that future generations can benefit from,” said Germany. Switzerland, which has sought to protect its pharmaceutical sector during talks, said it supports “a pragmatic, voluntary approach within existing frameworks, that take into account the advice and contributions from experts”. The European Union said that the agreement “marks an important accomplishment for global health security and cooperation” and “can bolster country capacities to prevent and prepare for pandemics using the One Health approach”. Ireland added that “the commitment to [pandemic] prevention through a One Health approach is the first of its kind to recognise the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health in our response to emerging health trends”. “The establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network and a pathogen access and benefit sharing system will ensure that the response to future health threats will be faster, more effective and more equitable,” it added. China said the agreement “will contribute to the fair distribution of health products, relevant technologies and resources to help developing countries enhance their capacities for prevention, preparedness and response” – but that it needed “some follow-up mechanisms, as well as sustained investment and capacity building efforts from all countries” to be effective. Kazakhstan said that “this is not just a global legal document. It is our collective response to a future where everybody will be protected, regardless of their economic position or status. We must underscore that the success outcome will be defined not only by its content, but also by its ability the state’s ability to implement it.” Jamaica, speaking for 22 countries in the Americas and Caribbean (excluding the USA), said the region was ready to do the work to finish the pandemic agreement. “We remember too vividly the oxygen shortages, the overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare workers, and over seven million lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jamaica. “For the Americas, this agreement means stronger commitments to regional manufacturing capacity, coordinated surveillance, research and development and transfer of technology, especially for developing countries.” ‘The worst of times’ INB co-chairs Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso Co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), South Africa’s Precious Matsoso and French Ambassador for Global Health Anne-Claire Amprou, also addressed the session, expressing appreciation to member states for their commitment. Matsoso reminded the WHA that the special assembly called to establish the INB was convened “at a time when we all wore masks, we practised social distancing, and we had face-to-face meetings that were highly restricted”. “It was the worst of times, the season of despair, of tragic losses, immeasurable devastation – all associated with COVID-19,” said Matsoso. She praised delegates for working through “13 formal rounds of negotiations, many of them extended, producing various iterations of draft pandemic agreement and proposals that have culminated into what we have before us as a consensus draft”. Amprou, who took over as co-chair from Roland Driece of the Netherlands in July 2024, said that the process involved “three years of dialogue, of compromise, of debates, of sleepless nights, but above all, three years guided by a common conviction that health is a common good”. “The COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for us all. It was a brutal reminder of the fact that viruses know no borders. No country, however powerful, can address a global health crisis on its own,” said Amprou. Meanwhile, former co-chair Driece spoke for the Netherlands, expressed his appreciation that the long process had resulted in an agreement. Image Credits: WHO. Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Can Technology Tame the NCD Crisis? Experts Call for Smarter, Inclusive Digital Health Solutions 20/05/2025 Maayan Hoffman Digital blood pressure monitoring devices have now become widely available The pace of technological change today is nothing short of revolutionary, according to Dr Douglas Bettcher, Senior Advisor in the Director-General’s Office at the World Health Organization (WHO). “I think we find ourselves very strangely in the last couple of years, in what seems to be a really brave new world, brave new reality,” he told attendees at Monday’s Global Self-Care Federation (GSCF) event, which focused on how digital innovations could help prevent and manage noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). “A case can be made that this communications revolution is even greater and more mind-boggling than what we’ve seen in the past,” Bettcher continued. “Even some pundits in the know compare this to the 19th-century industrial revolution. And what must be clear to us, being confronted with these very, very rapid changes, is that we in the public health community cannot be left standing during this digital innovation, this mass revolution.” Bettcher, who discussed WHO’s Be He@lthy, Be Mobile (BHBM) program, stressed that the train has already left the station. Industries that harm health are already leveraging artificial intelligence and related technologies. Now, he said, it’s time for those working to improve health to use them too. The Monday event—hosted as a side event of the 78th World Health Assembly—was a collaboration between GSCF, WHO, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Titled “Empowering Self-Care: Digital Innovations for NCD Prevention and Management,” it highlighted the vital role of self-care and digital technology in tackling NCDs, emphasizing cross-sector collaboration. Keynote addresses were given by H.E. Honourable Tuafafa Latasi, a member of the Tuvalu parliament, and Dr Dympna Kavanagh, the Chief Dental Officer of Ireland’s Department of Health. “Digital innovation has the power to transform healthcare and how we look after ourselves,” said moderator Shiulie Ghosh. “That is the role of digital innovation in preventing and managing some of the biggest causes of death across the globe.” She emphasized that digital tools can improve access to self-care and empower individuals living with NCDs to monitor and manage their conditions effectively. GSCF Director-General Greg Perry added, “We are at a pivotal moment in NCDs,” referring to WHO’s release last week of the zero draft of the political declaration on NCDs and mental health. The draft was published in preparation for the upcoming High-Level Meeting on September 25. Greg Perry (center) The declaration outlines proposed global targets for 2030: 150 million fewer people using tobacco 150 million more people managing their hypertension 150 million more people gaining access to mental health care The 10-page draft includes a set of five sub-targets, offering a roadmap for reaching these ambitious goals. “Digital tools can play a very, very important part,” Perry told the audience. “When we talk about self-care, we’re not just about keeping fit, eating correctly, or even brushing our teeth. We’re talking about the necessary tools for people to self-care.” These tools may include medicines and digital applications from the industry’s perspective. “If you add AI and digital applications together with the current and future self-care tools that are available and will be available, we are on the verge of almost a self-care revolution,” Perry said. “These [tools] will be accessible, they’ll be self-managed, and they will have a very high impact.” Making digital self-care tools useful and trusted One key challenge with emerging digital self-care tools is the lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into people’s daily lives. Luis Lourenço of the International Pharmaceutical Federation noted that pharmacists are often the first point of contact when individuals seek advice or support related to digital tools. “When you talk about the impact of digital tools on primary health care, you can focus on four major areas: prevention, health literacy, diagnosis, and the management of a chronic disease,” Lourenço said. He added that health literacy is often one of the most complicated aspects. While having access to information is essential, Lourenço emphasized that it’s not enough. People also need to understand the information and apply it in their routines. “What’s the point of having information about your blood pressure if you don’t understand what it means or when to incorporate it?” he asked. “What we have today is a lot of access to information, but people rely a lot, mostly on their healthcare partners, healthcare professionals, and pharmacists.” Without that support, he said, people may have information but not know how to use it effectively. Lourenço also pointed out that people want to be sure the tools they use are evidence-based and trustworthy. However, Debbie Rogers, CEO of Reach Digital Health, offered a slightly different perspective, suggesting that if digital tools provide enough value, people will ultimately trust them. Addressing accessibility, accountability, and inclusion Another key challenge is user hesitation, particularly among specific populations, about whether they want to use digital tools at all. “On one hand, we have developed countries. We have higher literacy levels. We have digital-savvy sort of people,” explained Hussain Jafri of the World Patient Alliance. “They are using [digital tools] and giving us very good results. But then you look at the other populations—at the lower- and middle-income countries and the elderly population, the people who are not tech-savvy. They are not really using them.” Jafri shared that he once downloaded an app designed for people with pre-diabetes but found it too complicated and deleted it after only a few days. Experts said encouraging adoption also depends on better integration of these tools into healthcare systems, where people feel accountable for the data they enter. Lourenço noted that if patients knew their doctors were reviewing the data collected in an app, it would likely motivate them to use the tool more consistently. Jafri stressed that companies developing digital health technologies must involve users, patients, and providers early in the design process, rather than waiting until products are already on the market. “I think they also need to take into account our input—the input of the people who are going to use [the tools] should also be there while they’re developing these products, so that, you know, once it is out there, people are happy using it,” he said. Language accessibility is another barrier. Jafri emphasized the importance of localization. “These [tools] need to be in multiple languages, not just English,” he said, adding that companies should also provide training for providers and patients to ensure successful adoption. Empowering mothers through technology: South African case study A pregnant woman in Africa (illustrative) There are already promising examples of how digital health tools are making a difference, as illustrated by Rogers of Reach Digital Health. She shared a case from South Africa, where hypertension during pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. “We have a program called MomConnect, where every mother who comes into the clinic can sign up to receive messaging throughout her pregnancy and until her baby is two years old,” Rogers explained. The mothers receive both information and behavior-change tips. They can also ask questions and provide feedback to the system. Because hypertension is such a critical issue, the National Department of Health wanted to better understand the root causes. They started by asking mothers about their experience during their first antenatal visit: Did they have their blood pressure taken? Were they told what the results were? If so, were they prescribed the appropriate medication? “It was important to understand that patient journey, understand where the challenges were, and to do this at a national scale,” Rogers said. Based on the insights gathered, the department introduced targeted training for healthcare workers. This effort helped drive increased demand for quality care from the patients themselves. “We got mothers to go back to their clinic and say, ‘You didn’t take my blood pressure last time. I want you to take my blood pressure,’ or ‘you didn’t put me on the right medication.'” Rogers concluded that this initiative “shows the power of being able to empower people, both with information and behavior change, communication knowledge, so they knew what they had to ask for and what they were looking out for.” Carl Massonneau, Technical Officer for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research for the WHO, speaking from the audience, explained that another tool recently released by the World Health Organization is the Digital Adaptation Kit for Antenatal Care. The kit translates WHO recommendations into machine-readable formats, making integrating them into digital health systems easier. Carl Massonneau of the WHO One specific feature of the kit is a tool for self-monitoring blood pressure among pregnant women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders. That tool will be released next week. “It’s the first time we’re putting a step in this world and trying to provide standards to improve the quality of digital health interventions we have,” Massonneau said. He acknowledged that although a growing number of digital technologies are available, there are still major challenges in ensuring they are evidence-based, equitable, and accessible. Integrating Digital Tools Into Broader NCD Strategies As the conversation around digital health tools evolves, experts caution that no single solution will address the full complexity of noncommunicable diseases. Lourenço noted that while some aspects of NCDs fall under primary prevention, where individuals can be empowered to make healthier choices, others require more structured support. He said that strategic outreach, including digital media, can help move people from “pre-contemplation to contemplation,” encouraging them to recognize risks, develop motivation, and ultimately commit to change. However, he emphasized that many behaviors tied to NCDs cannot be addressed through self-care alone. These require ongoing guidance and system-level support. Effective management, Lourenço said, demands full integration within a broader framework—” at the policy level, at the health system level, [and] at the community level.” In this context, digital innovation is not a silver bullet but a key part of a larger ecosystem—one that must be built with intentional design, inclusive access, and cross-sector collaboration to truly transform outcomes in global health. Image Credits: Marco Verch/Flickr , Provided by Global Self-Care Foundation, Elizabeth Poll/MMV, Elaine Fletcher. Country After Country Endorse Pandemic Agreement in Enormous Show of Support 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Countries indicating their wish to speak about the pandemic agreement in Committee A An enormous list of World Health Organization (WHO) member states, 173 in all, lined up to speak in favour of the pandemic agreement at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on Monday – an extraordinary demonstration of the breadth of support for the document. By the end yesterday’s meeting of Committee A, member states passed the pandemic agreement resolution by vote not consensus – at the insistence of Slovakia – with 124 in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. The WHA plenary is due to consider the resolution on Tuesday. But between the cheers were reminders that the talks are not yet done. An annex still needs to be negotiated to establish the mechanisms for a pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) system – the most controversial aspect of the three-year talks. The PABS system will develop a mechanism for how countries that share information about pathogens with pandemic potential may benefit if pharmaceutical products are developed as a result. “As a country that has shared its pathogens, often without equitable returns, the PABS system is paramount in rectifying these imbalances and ensuring the realisation of genuine equity and equitable access,” said South African Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, speaking for the Africa region in Committee A, where the document was being discussed. The Africa region sees the target of 20% of pandemic products being reserved for the WHO for distribution to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by manufacturers participating in PABS, with at least 10% as a donation, during future pandemics, as a “positive first step”, added Motsoaledi. Speaker after speaker urged countries to maintain their political commitment to the PABS negotiations and reach an agreement on the annex before next year’s WHA. Even Hungary, a staunch ally of United States President Donald Trump, welcomed the agreement – and stressed that it did not infringe on countries’ sovereignty, a key claim of disinformation about the pandemic. Trump distanced the US from the pandemic agreement at the outset of his presidency in January, and many of his MAGA supporters claim it is a “power grab” by the WHO. Iran and Paraguay said they could not support the current pandemic agreement draft – reserving support until after the PABS negotiations. Meanwhile, Slovakia, which is led by Prime Minister Robert Fico who has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccines, demanded that the agreement be put to a vote during the committee session. Delegates at WHA’s Committee A after it adopted the pandemic agreeemnt by vote First ‘One Health’ agreement Germany said it “would have welcomed stronger provisions, particularly regarding prevention,” but “recognise this agreement as a critical and timely step toward global solidarity and multilateralism”. “We urge all member states to engage in the upcoming annex negotiations with the same political will and unity that have brought us this far. Let us continue to invest in international cooperation and global solidarity, not only to protect our citizens, but also to lay the groundwork that future generations can benefit from,” said Germany. Switzerland, which has sought to protect its pharmaceutical sector during talks, said it supports “a pragmatic, voluntary approach within existing frameworks, that take into account the advice and contributions from experts”. The European Union said that the agreement “marks an important accomplishment for global health security and cooperation” and “can bolster country capacities to prevent and prepare for pandemics using the One Health approach”. Ireland added that “the commitment to [pandemic] prevention through a One Health approach is the first of its kind to recognise the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health in our response to emerging health trends”. “The establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network and a pathogen access and benefit sharing system will ensure that the response to future health threats will be faster, more effective and more equitable,” it added. China said the agreement “will contribute to the fair distribution of health products, relevant technologies and resources to help developing countries enhance their capacities for prevention, preparedness and response” – but that it needed “some follow-up mechanisms, as well as sustained investment and capacity building efforts from all countries” to be effective. Kazakhstan said that “this is not just a global legal document. It is our collective response to a future where everybody will be protected, regardless of their economic position or status. We must underscore that the success outcome will be defined not only by its content, but also by its ability the state’s ability to implement it.” Jamaica, speaking for 22 countries in the Americas and Caribbean (excluding the USA), said the region was ready to do the work to finish the pandemic agreement. “We remember too vividly the oxygen shortages, the overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare workers, and over seven million lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jamaica. “For the Americas, this agreement means stronger commitments to regional manufacturing capacity, coordinated surveillance, research and development and transfer of technology, especially for developing countries.” ‘The worst of times’ INB co-chairs Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso Co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), South Africa’s Precious Matsoso and French Ambassador for Global Health Anne-Claire Amprou, also addressed the session, expressing appreciation to member states for their commitment. Matsoso reminded the WHA that the special assembly called to establish the INB was convened “at a time when we all wore masks, we practised social distancing, and we had face-to-face meetings that were highly restricted”. “It was the worst of times, the season of despair, of tragic losses, immeasurable devastation – all associated with COVID-19,” said Matsoso. She praised delegates for working through “13 formal rounds of negotiations, many of them extended, producing various iterations of draft pandemic agreement and proposals that have culminated into what we have before us as a consensus draft”. Amprou, who took over as co-chair from Roland Driece of the Netherlands in July 2024, said that the process involved “three years of dialogue, of compromise, of debates, of sleepless nights, but above all, three years guided by a common conviction that health is a common good”. “The COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for us all. It was a brutal reminder of the fact that viruses know no borders. No country, however powerful, can address a global health crisis on its own,” said Amprou. Meanwhile, former co-chair Driece spoke for the Netherlands, expressed his appreciation that the long process had resulted in an agreement. Image Credits: WHO. Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Country After Country Endorse Pandemic Agreement in Enormous Show of Support 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Countries indicating their wish to speak about the pandemic agreement in Committee A An enormous list of World Health Organization (WHO) member states, 173 in all, lined up to speak in favour of the pandemic agreement at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on Monday – an extraordinary demonstration of the breadth of support for the document. By the end yesterday’s meeting of Committee A, member states passed the pandemic agreement resolution by vote not consensus – at the insistence of Slovakia – with 124 in favour, zero objections, and 11 abstentions. The WHA plenary is due to consider the resolution on Tuesday. But between the cheers were reminders that the talks are not yet done. An annex still needs to be negotiated to establish the mechanisms for a pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) system – the most controversial aspect of the three-year talks. The PABS system will develop a mechanism for how countries that share information about pathogens with pandemic potential may benefit if pharmaceutical products are developed as a result. “As a country that has shared its pathogens, often without equitable returns, the PABS system is paramount in rectifying these imbalances and ensuring the realisation of genuine equity and equitable access,” said South African Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, speaking for the Africa region in Committee A, where the document was being discussed. The Africa region sees the target of 20% of pandemic products being reserved for the WHO for distribution to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by manufacturers participating in PABS, with at least 10% as a donation, during future pandemics, as a “positive first step”, added Motsoaledi. Speaker after speaker urged countries to maintain their political commitment to the PABS negotiations and reach an agreement on the annex before next year’s WHA. Even Hungary, a staunch ally of United States President Donald Trump, welcomed the agreement – and stressed that it did not infringe on countries’ sovereignty, a key claim of disinformation about the pandemic. Trump distanced the US from the pandemic agreement at the outset of his presidency in January, and many of his MAGA supporters claim it is a “power grab” by the WHO. Iran and Paraguay said they could not support the current pandemic agreement draft – reserving support until after the PABS negotiations. Meanwhile, Slovakia, which is led by Prime Minister Robert Fico who has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccines, demanded that the agreement be put to a vote during the committee session. Delegates at WHA’s Committee A after it adopted the pandemic agreeemnt by vote First ‘One Health’ agreement Germany said it “would have welcomed stronger provisions, particularly regarding prevention,” but “recognise this agreement as a critical and timely step toward global solidarity and multilateralism”. “We urge all member states to engage in the upcoming annex negotiations with the same political will and unity that have brought us this far. Let us continue to invest in international cooperation and global solidarity, not only to protect our citizens, but also to lay the groundwork that future generations can benefit from,” said Germany. Switzerland, which has sought to protect its pharmaceutical sector during talks, said it supports “a pragmatic, voluntary approach within existing frameworks, that take into account the advice and contributions from experts”. The European Union said that the agreement “marks an important accomplishment for global health security and cooperation” and “can bolster country capacities to prevent and prepare for pandemics using the One Health approach”. Ireland added that “the commitment to [pandemic] prevention through a One Health approach is the first of its kind to recognise the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health in our response to emerging health trends”. “The establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network and a pathogen access and benefit sharing system will ensure that the response to future health threats will be faster, more effective and more equitable,” it added. China said the agreement “will contribute to the fair distribution of health products, relevant technologies and resources to help developing countries enhance their capacities for prevention, preparedness and response” – but that it needed “some follow-up mechanisms, as well as sustained investment and capacity building efforts from all countries” to be effective. Kazakhstan said that “this is not just a global legal document. It is our collective response to a future where everybody will be protected, regardless of their economic position or status. We must underscore that the success outcome will be defined not only by its content, but also by its ability the state’s ability to implement it.” Jamaica, speaking for 22 countries in the Americas and Caribbean (excluding the USA), said the region was ready to do the work to finish the pandemic agreement. “We remember too vividly the oxygen shortages, the overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare workers, and over seven million lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jamaica. “For the Americas, this agreement means stronger commitments to regional manufacturing capacity, coordinated surveillance, research and development and transfer of technology, especially for developing countries.” ‘The worst of times’ INB co-chairs Anne-Claire Amprou and Precious Matsoso Co-chairs of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), South Africa’s Precious Matsoso and French Ambassador for Global Health Anne-Claire Amprou, also addressed the session, expressing appreciation to member states for their commitment. Matsoso reminded the WHA that the special assembly called to establish the INB was convened “at a time when we all wore masks, we practised social distancing, and we had face-to-face meetings that were highly restricted”. “It was the worst of times, the season of despair, of tragic losses, immeasurable devastation – all associated with COVID-19,” said Matsoso. She praised delegates for working through “13 formal rounds of negotiations, many of them extended, producing various iterations of draft pandemic agreement and proposals that have culminated into what we have before us as a consensus draft”. Amprou, who took over as co-chair from Roland Driece of the Netherlands in July 2024, said that the process involved “three years of dialogue, of compromise, of debates, of sleepless nights, but above all, three years guided by a common conviction that health is a common good”. “The COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for us all. It was a brutal reminder of the fact that viruses know no borders. No country, however powerful, can address a global health crisis on its own,” said Amprou. Meanwhile, former co-chair Driece spoke for the Netherlands, expressed his appreciation that the long process had resulted in an agreement. Image Credits: WHO. Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tedros Urges Countries to Support ‘Modest Budget’ – And Help Close $1.7 Billion Gap 19/05/2025 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros addresses the 78th WHA The World Health Organization (WHO) faces “significant challenges” amid “significant achievements”, characterised by a 21% budget cut alongside the imminent adoption of a pandemic agreement, Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the opening of the World Health Assembly on Monday. Tedros appealed to member states to support its “extremely modest” budget, reduced from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion for the 2026-2027 biennium as a result of the United States’ withdrawal from the global body. But this modest amount isn’t even in the bank yet. It relies on member states agreeing to increase membership fees and receiving more donations via the WHO’s next Investment Round to be held in Geneva on Tuesday. “Assuming you approve the increased assessed contributions [membership fees], and thanks to the investment round, we’re confident that we have already secured more than $2.6 billion of the funding for the next biennium. That leaves an anticipated budget gap of more than $1.7 billion,” said Tedros. He added that raising that amount in the current landscape would be a challenge but described the figure – $2.1 billion a year – as “extremely modest” for an organisation “working on the ground in 150 countries with the vast mission and mandate that member states have given us”. “$2.1 billion is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours,” said Tedros, and “a quarter of what the tobacco industry spends on advertising and promotion every single year”. The 78th WHA opened in Geneva on Monday. Reducing costs has led to a reformulation of the organisation and with significant staff layoffs ahead. The WHA gave a round of applause to outgoing executive team members Dr Mike Ryan, Dr Samira Asma, Dr Bruce Aylward, Dr Catharina Boehme, Dr Li Ailan and Dr Jerome Salomon, who will be leaving the WHO as part of this process. “A reduced workforce means a reduced scope of work. The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available,” he added. Steep bilateral aid cuts However, the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and deep cuts to the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have strained the finances of many member states, some of which may not be in a position to increase their contributions to WHO. “Many Ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,” Teros acknowledged. “In at least 70 countries, patients are missing out on treatments. Health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending. “Although this is a challenge, many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources.” But at the same time, several countries were doubling and tripling their defence spending, spending “vast sums protecting themselves against attacks from other countries, but relatively little on protecting themselves from an invisible enemy that can cause far more havoc and damage,” said Tedros, pointing out that COVID-19 killed an estimated 20 million people. Key achievements Tedros described the pandemic agreement as a “historic moment” amid “significant opposition”. In the past year, the WHO coordinated the response to 51 graded emergencies in 89 countries including “outbreaks, natural disasters, conflicts and more”. It delivered urgently needed specialist medical supplies worth $196 million to 80 countries, supporting countries to address cholera, Marburg and Ebola. WHO is poised to resume aid to Gaza as soon as Israel lifts its blockade, said Tedros, who appealed to member states to assist the more than 10,000 patients who need medical evacuation out of Gaza. “War is not the solution. Peace and political solutions are the solution,” he stressed. Tedros stressed that the WHO’s “increased focus on science, data and digital health” is “the future of the organisation”. “WHO’s normative standard-setting work is its bread and butter, and we have streamlined processes to give member states the highest quality, evidence-based advice as fast as possible,” said Tedros. “Last year, there were 65 million downloads of WHO publications, guidance and other materials.” Swiss support Welcoming delegates to Geneva, Swiss Federal Council member Élisabeth Baume-Schneider stressed that her country was committed to supporting the WHO, and would contribute $80 million to the organisation over the next four years. “The WHO is the only real global platform for cooperation on health matters which has legitimacy, respect and can do the job,” said Schneider. “It is the only international organisation dealing with health which is run by its member states, and that means shared responsibility… We, as her member states, need to demonstrate that we are ready to reconsider our relationship with the organisation and ensure that we offer our full support.” WHA president, Dr Teodoro Herbosa of Philippines, urged the assembly to be focused on “unity not unilateralism, solidarity not isolation”. New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy
New WHO Regional Director Nominated by African Member States 18/05/2025 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Newly-elected African Regional Director, Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi. Dr Mohamed Yakub Janabi, of Tanzania, was elected as the new African Region nominee for Regional Director, in a special meeting of the WHO African Regional Committee on Sunday – replacing fellow Tanzanian, RD-elect Dr Faustine Ndugulile, who died suddenly in November, 2024. The WHO Executive Board will be asked to approve Janabi’s nomination at their meeting immediately after the World Health Assembly, clearing the way for his formal appointment by WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Janabi beat out three other candidates in secret voting by the committee, which followed a series of presentations and interviews of the four candidates at Sunday’s meeting. They included candidates proposed by Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Guinea. A senior health advisor to Tanzania’s late president and its present head of state, Samia Hassan, Janabi is a cardiologist by training and the former executive director of Tanzania’s largest hospital. Born in 1962, his career spans over three decades of work in clinical and policy settings, from the early days of the HIV epidemic to his role today as presidential advisor, he noted, in his presentation before the African Regional Committee. Hardships caused by out-of-pocket expenses Janabi said his first priority as Regional Director would be achieving Universal Health Coverage for the African Region, reducing catastrophic health expenses that cause financial hardship. “During the course of my duties, I have witnessed, first hand, patients being denied access to health care due to financial constraints, families parting ways with their position, their very means of living just to pay hospital bills,” he told the Regional Committee. “Yet, despite making these heartbreaking sacrifices, many still find themselves trapped in debt and still in poor health conditions. For me, this is a harrowing experience out of pocket, costs have pushed countless families into the depths of poverty, thereby recycling poverty.” He also noted his involvement in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and Mozambique in the early 2000s, and later, public health advocacy that convinced Tanzania’s then-president to get a public HIV test, “encouraging 5 million Tanzanians to get tested that year.” In 2021, he supported Tanzania’s new president, Samia Hassan, in devising a new, COVID-19 vaccination strategy, “which played a key role in countering misinformation and boosting vaccine uptake,” he noted. Hassan took over following the death in March 2021 of then-President John Magufuli, a COVID vaccine skeptic, who ultimately succumbed to the virus himself, according to some reports. Janabi also is the founder of the Jakaya Kikwete Heart Institute in 2014, which he claimed achieved a “95% reduction in overseas heart disease referrals” within five years of its founding. Building health systems on primary health care Other priorities he cited would include supporting larger fixed contributions to WHO from member states “for more predictable, flexible and sustainable investment” along with stepped up domestic financing for health systems – through blended financing, private-public partnerships and solidarity levies.” Building emergency preparedness, including through cross border collaborations, as well as advancing maternal and child health, along with nutrition, are other high priority items he said, noting that 70% of maternal deaths and 56% of deaths of children under the age of 5 still occur on the continent. Janabi also pledged to tackle infectious diseases as well as non-communicable diseases through a “One Health” approach that “acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment” – as well as tackling antimicrobial resistance, through better surveillance systems, as well as strengthening local production of diagnostic, therapeutics and vaccines “by leveraging the pandemic agreement” – the new accord expected to be approved at this year’s WHA. He added that primary health care and Community Health Worker networks need more investment as the backbone of health systems – noting that in high-income countries nurse practitioners carry out many functions that doctors used to perform. “You have to build on your community health workers, because these are the people who have the trust. They are the people who are communicating with your general population every day,” he said, adding, “There’s other thing, which unfortunately is not very prominent in Africa. They are called nurse practitioners… So if they get training on basic things like immunization, maternal and child health, education, these efforts will improve access.” Janabi, once confirmed by WHO’s Executive Board and formally appointed by the DG, will step into the shoes of the late RD-elect, Nduguilile, who died on November 27, 2024, at the age of 55, while receiving medical treatment in India. Ndugulile, a former Tanzanian Deputy Health Minister and member of parliament had been elected as the WHO Africa Regional Director in August of 2024 and was scheduled to begin his term in February 2025. His death led to a special session of the WHO Regional Committee for Africa in January 2025 to decide on a new election process. Dr Matshidiso Moeti had been the WHO Africa Director for two terms before Ndugulile’s election. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts