Protect, Pay and Promote Women Health Workers 05/04/2024 Tabinda Sarosh & Amina Dorayi The Lady Health Worker programme in Pakistan have helped to double the child vaccination rate. Each woman in the health workforce is powerful, capable of transforming individual lives, communities, and nations when supported in her role. Women health workers deliver care to approximately five billion people, mostly as nurses, midwives, and community health workers. They contribute $3 trillion to global health annually, half in unpaid work. Despite constituting 70% of the global health workforce, they often serve in low-status jobs, with little or no pay. Men hold 75% of health leadership roles and, on average, earn 28% more than women. Investing in these women is a smart move, offering an estimated 9:1 return on investment and contributing to women’s economic empowerment. This World Health Worker Week (1-7 April), and ahead of the Africa Health Workforce Investment Forum in May, we call on governments and the global health sector to recognize the transformative contributions of women in the health workforce by developing and implementing policies to ensure their protection, pay, and promotions. Immense potential of women in health Women health workers play a dual role, improving health outcomes while advancing gender equality by serving as role models in societies where women’s participation is limited. Studies indicate that promoting gender equality within communities not only fosters economic growth but also enhances access to contraception and reduces child mortality. Moreover, these workers significantly contribute to economic prosperity by serving as frontline caregivers in rural areas with inadequate health infrastructure, promoting sexual and reproductive health and rights, and investing in the health and education of their families. The World Economic Forum predicts that by 2050, the climate crisis will result in 14.5 million more deaths and $12.5 trillion in economic losses, with an additional $1.1 trillion in costs to health systems. Women and children will bear the biggest burden, highlighting the urgent need for women health workers to play a crucial part as part of a broader multidisciplinary effort in educating communities, supporting the delivery of healthcare in challenging conditions, and advocating for policies that mitigate the health impacts of climate change. As most of the health workforce, they can respond to climate-induced health emergencies like the rise in infectious diseases, the effects of extreme heat on pregnant women, and the rise in waterborne disease. Saving lives in Pakistan and Nigeria Women health workers can help achieve universal health coverage, and foster stable, prosperous societies through global health security. This potential holds true everywhere. For example, Pakistan and Nigeria – despite their unique cultures, politics, and economies – face similar challenges such as rapid urbanization, weak rural health care, high maternal and child mortality, extreme vulnerability to climate change, and gender inequalities. Ensuring we protect, support, and invest in women health workers is a high-impact solution. Lady Health Workers (LHW) and community midwives in Pakistan, through initiatives like the Pathfinder ‘building healthy families’ program, provided critical support during the 2022 floods when a third of the country was under water. LHW canvassed districts in Sindh Province, reaching communities with 20,000 dignity kits for safe pregnancies, and information on nutrition, hygiene, and health, easing the floods’ toll. Midwives delivered babies at birthing stations that replaced flooded health clinics. LHWs also played a crucial role during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing vital information on infection prevention and supporting isolated women at risk with information on gender-based violence services. Since 1994, when the LHW program began, these workers have contributed to the number of fully vaccinated children nearly doubling. They have helped to cut maternal and newborn deaths and increase family planning access. A Nigerian mother and her baby who benefited from the Saving Mothers Giving Life programme Similarly, Community Health Extension Workers (CHEWs), nurses, and midwives in Nigeria—mostly women—have saved numerous lives, through programs like Saving Mothers Giving Life. In Cross River State, CHEWs provided emergency obstetric and newborn care services in rural communities and referred complicated cases to higher-level health facilities leading to a 66% decrease in maternal mortality in supported health facilities over three years. In Akwa Ibom state, CHEWs learned how to offer clinical contraceptive methods—injectables and implants—at local health facilities, and within two years of the training, uptake of modern contraceptives doubled while the number of women with contraceptive implants tripled. What we need to do now Investing in women in the health workforce fosters health, development, and prosperity. To maximize this investment, we must protect, pay, and promote women, formalizing their roles within health system strategies, plans and budgets, and providing adequate training and mentorship from higher level providers. We must elevate women into leadership positions, ensuring they are involved in budget planning and on emergency response committees, and support them with woman-friendly policies like maternity leave, childcare support, and protection against workplace harassment and discrimination. We must ensure they receive a fair wage. Without these investments, the power of women in the health workforce will be a missed opportunity. Dr. Tabinda Sarosh is Pathfinder’s President in South Asia, Middle East, and North Africa. She is accountable for the impact and performance of Pathfinder’s programs in Bangladesh, India, Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan. Dr. Amina Aminu Dorayi is Pathfinder’s Country Director in Nigeria. She has extensive experience designing and managing health system and sustainable development programs seeking to improve the health of women, girls, and communities. Image Credits: Women Deliver, Pathfinder. Youth in ‘Forgotten’ Afghanistan Need Community-Based Systems to Address Drug Abuse and Mental Health Disorders 04/04/2024 Manija Mirzaie Afghan opium poppy cultivation sustains many rual communities – and keeps many in the adiction vicious cycle The ‘forgotten crisis’ of Afghanistan has exposed more and more young Afghans to mental health problems and drug abuse amid dwindling donor support and crumbling healthcare under the Taliban regime, said experts at a high-level side event at the recent meeting of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs in Vienna Austria. Since the Taliban imposed a drug ban in April 2022, opium poppy cultivation in the war-ravaged country has dropped by around 95%, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). But experts claim that drug abuse, particularly among the youth, is getting worse – and is being compounded by a lack of treatment. The WHO estimates that around 2.9 million people abuse drugs in the country, while nine million have mental health issues in a population of around 38,3 million. Holistic approach At the side-event on “Mental health and substance use disorders in Afghanistan”, hosted by the World Health Organization (WHO), UNODC, the European Union (EU) and the Japanese government, stakeholders said the rapidly deteriorating socio-political environment in the country poses new challenges that require a more holistic approach and engagement with the Taliban authorities to save millions of lives. Jean-Luc Lemahieu, UNODC’s director of policy analysis and public affairs, said that many youngsters trying to escape the Taliban’s oppressive system of governance are vulnerable to drug abuse and exploitation, including radicalization. To confront those threats, a system of community-based programmes anchored around existing primary health care services, should be developed, he and other experts speaking at the session emphasized. Those need to address both drug addiction and offer “active livelihood support and vocational skill training.” Opium poppy farming in Afghanistan dramatically decreased after a 2022 drug ban. UN officials noted that the “near-total contraction of the opiate economy is expected to have far-reaching consequences” for rural communities who relied on income from cultivating opium. “Farmers’ income from selling the 2023 opium harvest to traders fell by more than 92 per cent from an estimated $1,360 million for the 2022 harvest to $110 million in 2023,” according to UNODC. The WHO estimates that 23.7 million Afghan people will need humanitarian assistance this year as economic conditions in the country deteriorate. In addition, 9.5 million people have no or very limited access to healthcare. Experts at the event warned that mental health and drug addiction can have far reaching public health consequences, including higher mortality rates, infectious diseases like HIV, hepatitis as well as diminished productivity. Social tensions Raffaella Iodice, Chargée d’Affaires and deputy head of the EU Delegation to Afghanistan, told the conference that mental health issues and drug addiction can trigger social tensions and negatively influence stability in communities. “Investing in drug demand reduction and mental health, quality, evidence-based and comprehensive treatment and prevention can pave the way for more sustainable and resilient communities that are critical for advancing the overall economic situation,” she said. The EU is supporting a 100-bed Female and Children Drug Addiction Treatment Centre (DATC) in Kabul, which was established in December 2023. It assists mothers and children up to the age of 17, offering “child counselling sessions that surpass conventional education, acting as a crucial pillar of support for young minds navigating the complexities of addiction”, according to a report from the WHO EMRO region. Expanding outpatient services at primary health care level Abdul Hakim, who was enrolled in a drug addiction treatment centre in Kabul eight months ago after 20 years of drug addiction, told Health Policy Watch that the easy availability of drugs was one of main reasons why many return to addiction after treatment and recovery. “If the authorities collect the drugs and dealers from the market, we will recover and stop using drugs,” he said. Kabul city resident Gholam Ali, whose son became addicted to drugs eight years ago, told Health Policy Watch that his son has been treated several times, but easy access to drugs has made him addicted to it again. “There was no clinic left that I did not take my son to. He is treated for one or two months in each clinic, but when he leaves the clinic, there are drug addicts and drugs available outside, and he turns to drugs again,” said Ali. Anja Busse, a UNODC programme officer working on prevention, treatment and rehabilitation, said that the treatment model that exists in Afghanistan right now, based around clinics in large cities, is unable to meet the needs in the sprawling country, where rural needs are neglected. “The outpatient services in the community would need to be widely expanded and to be integrated in the community based health care approaches to have a continuum of care,” said Busse. “ The reduced availability of previously widely used opioids at local markets has potentially increased risks for people with drug dependence due to increased levels of police interactions.” Afghanistan’s health system system has been struggling to meet mounting demands amid dwindling aid and restrictions. Stigma is also a problem. “Whether we are facing a mental health patient or substance use disorder client, we are facing a major stigma issue and most of the communities,” said Dr Vail Al-Raas, the mental health and psychosocial support coordinator at the International Medical Corps in Afghanistan. She suggested the mental health treatment programs should be integrated into existing public health primary care programmes to use existing infrastructure and resources. “This can give [these programmes] a good chance to expand and be implemented on the ground, and interest has recently been shown by some donors.” Image Credits: Resolute Support Media, UNODC. Access Battle for New Generation Obesity Drugs 04/04/2024 Zuzanna Stawiska The new generation of obesity drugs have reached sky-high popularity – and command high prices. Demand for diabetes drugs such as Wegovy, Ozempic, Rybelsis and Trulicity has soared since they have been clinically proven to help weight loss – but they are massively overpriced in the US and unavailable in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), according to Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). The mark-up for these drugs – called glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists (GLP-1) – in the US is almost 40,000%, according to a paper published in JAMA last week authored by Yale University’s Dr Melissa Barber and MSF’s Dr Dzintars Gotham, Dr Helen Bygrave and Christa Cepuch. The authors modelled the manufacturing costs of a variety of diabetes medications and added a modest profit margin. “MSF’s study estimates that GLP-1s for diabetes could be sold at a profit for just $0.89 per month, compared to the price of $95 per month charged in Brazil, $115 per month charged in South Africa, $230 charged in Latvia and at least $353 charged in the US [based on Medicare price], which is a 39,562% markup over what the estimated generic price could be,” according to MSF’s press release. In fact, the US drug costs are usually much higher, reaching as much as about $1000 monthly. Novo Nordisk makes both Ozempic and Wegovy (which contains a higher dose of the active ingredient, semaglutide, than Ozempic), while Eli Lilly makes Trulicity. Some are oral pills and others are injections. US Senator Bernie Sanders has called on Novo Nordisk to lower the price of Ozempic Wegovy in the US to no more than what they charge for this drug in Canada. “The American people are sick and tired of paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs while the pharmaceutical industry enjoys huge profits,” said Sanders in a statement. “As a result of a major grassroots movement, Novo Nordisk did the right thing by recently reducing the price of its insulin products by some 75% in America. Novo Nordisk, a company that made nearly $15 billion in profits last year, must now do the right thing with respect to Ozempic and Wegovy,” added Sanders, who chairs the US Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. FDA approval for weight management While GLP-1 drugs were made to treat diabetes, in 2021 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Wegovy for weight management in people with a body-mass index (BMI) of over 30, or a BMI of over 27 with underlying conditions such as high blood pressure. “Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly are the only producers of these GLP-1s today, and their intellectual property barriers on the drugs and injection devices block any generic manufacturing that could help drive prices down,” MSF notes. “The corporations have not even announced a price for low- and middle-income countries, nor have they licensed these drugs so that generic manufacturers could make them, which would help to meet global demand and drive prices down,” MSF says, noting that because they are now being used for weight loss in high-income countries, the companies are “unable to meet the massive demand”. Co-author Christa Cepuch, pharmacist coordinator at MSF’s Access Campaign, describes the new drugs as “an absolute game changer for people living with diabetes”, but cannot be accessed by people in LMICs. “Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk can in no way supply the world with the amount of these medicines needed to meet global demand, so they must immediately relinquish their stranglehold and allow them to be produced by more manufacturers around the world,” said Cepuch. The steep price of the drugs is hampering access even in the US, although the country’s federal health insurance programme, Medicare, recently struck a deal with Novo Nordisk, to cover the cost of Wegovy – but strictly for preventing heart attacks and strokes not for weight loss, Reuters reported. “The American people are sick and tired of paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs while the pharmaceutical industry enjoys huge profits,” said sen. Bernie Sanders, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on the US cost of GLP-1s. “Ozempic has the potential to be a game changer in the diabetes and obesity epidemics in America. But, if we do not substantially reduce the price of this drug, millions who need it will be unable to afford it,” he continued. Obesity’s heavy burden The GLP-1 drugs stimulate insulin production and feeling of satiety (fullness), promote weight loss, lower blood pressure and cholesterol, improve blood flow in the heart and uptake of glucose in the muscles, according to the US National Institute of Health. Side effects can include commonly nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, stomach pain, headache or stomach flu, and less often, depression with suicidal thoughts or kidney failure. Doctors warn that they need to be taken alongside a healthy diet and exercise. The US accounts for almost three-quarters of the sale of Novo-Nordisk’s Ozempic, Wegovy and Rybelsus, according to Pew Research Center. The country has an adult obesity rate of 42%, according to the American CDC, one of the highest in the world. Despite steep prices and side-effects, GLP-1s have become wildly popular in the last few years, especially in the US. Obesity is a growing problem worldwide, affecting 890 million adults – 16% of the global population – in 2022, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). The prevalence of this condition more than doubled between 1990 and 2022. Global costs of obesity and overweight are predicted to reach $3 trillion per year by 2030 and more than $18 trillion by 2060 at the current rate. In relation to obesity, World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus recently stressed that the private sector “must be held accountable for the health impacts of their products” as Health Policy Watch reported – a reference to the impact of products such as ultra-processed food and sugary drinks on obesity. Being overweight and obese increases people’s risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and cancer, WHO highlights, also affecting bone health and reproduction and increase the risk of certain cancers. Both conditions can be affected by gene composition, but are mostly a result of an imbalance of energy intake (diet) and energy expenditure (physical activity). As such, are largely dependent on the options the environment offers. “Obesity is a societal rather than an individual responsibility, with the solutions to be found through the creation of supportive environments and communities,” WHO says. The analytics platform, Airfinity, argues that it would be beneficial for public health to administer Wegovy to not only to diabetics type 2 patients, as the current Medicare deal allows, but to all people in the US with a BMI over 40. If 60% of people living with obesity and 40% of those of a BMI above 35 received the drugs, this could prevent as many as 300 000 heart failures in the US by 2030, according to Airfinity World distribution of obesity. Safe the extreme numbers for small populations (on the right), some Middle Eastern countries and the US show highest percentages. The demand for the Novo Nordisk drugs has more than quadrupled between 2019 and 2021, reaching 8.2 million prescriptions. In fact, the demand was so high that it caused many months of shortages in the US, making it difficult for many to obtain their doses, Reuters reports. Even those who do not have any medical reason to take GLP-1s often ask their doctors for a prescription. The drugs, seen as a miraculous way to achieveachieve wards a perfect body shape, feed hope that impossible beauty standards can be attained with a weekly injection. Despite the surge in demand for these drugs, it’s important to recognize that they alone cannot address the societal challenges associated with obesity. According to the WHO website, “Stopping the rise in obesity demands multisectoral actions such as food manufacturing, marketing and pricing and others that seek to address the wider determinants of health (such as poverty reduction and urban planning).” “While we are unaware of the analysis used in the [MSF] study, we have always recognized the need for continuous evaluation of innovation and affordability levers to support greater access of our products,” said Novo Nordisk in a statement. “We continue to support greater health equity to those in need of diabetes treatment and care.” Image Credits: Chemist4u, Pew Research Center. Tanzania Merges HIV and Diabetes Care to Tackle NCD Crisis 04/04/2024 Kizito Makoye A diabetic patient with kidney complications receiving dialysis treatment at the Muhimbili National Hospital in Non-communicable diseases like hypertension and diabetes have emerged as serious health crises in developing countries, as HIV was a decade ago. New models of primary health care that combine NCD and HIV care are catching on – and Tanzania is implementing this approach. DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania – Lying on a neatly made bed at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Zaituni Kashozi is recovering from surgery to amputate her gnarled toes that were infected by diabetic ulcers. Wrapped in iodine-stained bandage, her left foot dangles on a string attached to an aluminium bar that helps to propel her feeble blood circulation. The 74-year-old, who has grappled with diabetes for three decades, woke up to a grim reality a year ago when insidious infections took root, forcing her to go under the surgeon’s scalpel. “I don’t feel any pain on my feet. All the sense of touch is gone. Even if you prick me with a needle, I won’t feel it. What a terrible disease,” Kashozi laments. Within the walls of this 1,500-bed medical facility, the toll of diabetes is strikingly evident. Ward after ward echoes with the woes of chronic foot ulcers even blindness – a reflection of the toll diabetes is taking on the urban populace. Diabetes, a chronic metabolic disease, poses a serious health threat that can affect the heart, blood vessels, eyes, kidneys and nerves. An estimated 12.8% of the population had diabetes by 2021 – up from around 2.8% in a decade. However, cardiovascular disease such as strokes and heart attacks – often driven by hypertension – is the biggest NCD killer in the country. Many people are unaware that they have either hypertension or diabetes until very late. The elderly, like Kashozi, bear a huge burden of NCDs, and around 90% of those aged 50 and above navigate the labyrinth of health challenges without the safety net of health insurance, forcing them to dart between hospitals frantically seeking elusive medical care. HIV and NCD management under one roof On the other side of the city, Halfani Ali, a 53-year-old father of five, is struggling with the dual challenges of HIV/AIDS and diabetes. Since his HIV diagnosis in 2003, Ali has been receiving care and medication at various health centres across the city. However, in 2013, Ali’s life took an unexpected turn when he was diagnosed with diabetes. This dual burden of disease has presented a complex challenge, forcing him to juggle HIV and diabetes appointments at two different health centres. Recognizing the struggles faced by individuals like Ali, the Temeke Regional Referral Hospital in Dar es Salaam (TRRH) integrated health care for NCDs within the ambit of HIV services in 2023. Now individuals like Ali can manage coexisting conditions like diabetes and hypertension under the same roof. “I am very happy because I get all my medication at Temeke Hospital. I don’t have to travel all the way to Kariakoo to see a diabetes specialist,” says Ali, reflecting the relief he has experienced with the integrated approach. A health worker takes blood sample from Sultani Ally Kessy to test for diabetes during a diabetes camp at Temeke Regional Referral Hospital. Maria Bitwale, a senior oncologist at Temeke Hospital, says many HIV patients with diabetes are now seeking treatment, and the integrated approach is helping to deter potential health crisis triggered by diabetic complications. On a bright Saturday morning, Ali approaches the physician’s desk where his examination unfolds meticulously. Bitwale, armed with a patellar hammer, probes the nuances of his nerves, safeguarding against the perils of diabetic complications. Ali’s eyes light up as he recounts the doctor’s advice on nerve function control and a prescribed diet, ensuring he remains in robust health. In this amalgamation of medical expertise and personal resilience, Ali’s story is testimony to the success of integrated healthcare approach for killer diabetes, HIV and hypertension – diseases which previously could have led to a death sentence, alone or together. HIV is an entry point for NCD care In Tanzania, over 1.4 million people out of the country’s 61 million population are living with HIV. Of these, an estimated 29% have hypertension and 13% have diabetes. And it is these latter diseases that are now the main causes of death in Tanzanians living with HIV today. Integrating up NCDs care into HIV services, which are widely available at the primary health care level, is the one new model being used to diagnose, prevent and manage leading chronic diseases in a cost-effective manner. John Njingu, Tanzania’s Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Health, emphasises that integration of NCDs into primary healthcare facilities nationwide, extending to HIV-targeted clinics, where the screening and management of NCDs are offered to people with or without HIV under one roof. “We want to bring better health care services to the people at lower cost to the service providers and the patients themselves,” he told Health Policy Watch in an interview. The NCD response in Tanzania took a major leap forward in 2019 on World Diabetes Day, when a new National NCD Prevention and Control Programme was launched by Tanzania’s Prime Minister, Kassim Majaliwa. The NCD strategy has been rolled out in 700 primary health care clinics in 26 regions across Tanzania, 245 of them in the first stage. These PHC centres have been provided with basic NCD diagnostic equipment, and over 3,000 health care staff working at the centres have been trained in basic NCD care. The new programme builds on several years of effort by the Ministry of Health and national stakeholders to establish the necessary platform for NCD services to reach communities. The new strategy has been supported by a range of national as well as international partners, including World Health Organization (WHO), the Global Fund, the US President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and UNAIDS. The WHO guidelines call for HIV-NCD service integration across the continuum of care as does the 2021 Political Declaration of the UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting on HIV and AIDS. But there is still a long way to go, as the country has a total of 8,549 primary, secondary and tertiary heath facilities, according to the Ministry of Health. ‘Unprecedented’ in sub-Saharan Africa “What we have seen unfolding in Tanzania with basic NCD services for very common conditions such as diabetes and hypertension now reaching primary care across the country at this scale is arguably unprecedented in a sub-Saharan African context,” says Bent Lautrup-Nielsen, head of global advocacy at the World Diabetes Foundation (WDF). WDF began supporting NCD interventions in the country two decades ago, and has played a key supporting role in the new NCD programme launch. “With the strong results on NCDs achieved by the Ministry of Health, the President’s Office for Regional Administration of Local Government and key national partners such as Tanzania Diabetes Association and Tanzania NCD Alliance, the prospect of integrated primary care with NCDs becoming part of routine services everywhere alongside HIV, TB and maternal and newborn care are now quite promising,” said Lautrup-Nielsen. The INTE-Africa research team and stakeholders in Tanzania New research findings demonstrating the benefits of integration also have helped pave the way for broader change. In a ground-breaking study dubbed INTE-Africa, conducted in Tanzania and Uganda in 2022, scientists documented the benefits of merging and decentralising services for HIV, diabetes, and hypertension in terms of disease management and cost-savings. The study, published in The Lancet in 2023, found that integrated management resulted in a 75% higher rate of retention in care for people with HIV and one or more NCD conditions; did not adversely affect viral suppression rates among people with HIV; and was cost-saving in terms of the health services provided. The researchers randomly allocated 32 health facilities (17 in Uganda and 15 in Tanzania) serving 7,028 eligible patients, to integrated care or standard care groups. In the integrated care group, participants with HIV, diabetes or hypertension, were managed by the same health workers, used the same pharmacy, and had uniform medical records, registration and laboratory services. In the standard care group, patients attended separate standalone clinics for each condition, following the standard practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Data collection was conducted at baseline, as well as months six and 12. Retention was assessed through routine clinic attendance and track-and-trace procedures. Roadmap for policymakers The study’s findings lay out a roadmap for policymakers, not just in Tanzania and Uganda, but more widely across Africa for scaling up integrated care for conditions such as HIV, diabetes, and hypertension, saving money while providing effective care. The idea of anchoring such care in HIV clinics is based on the success in providing HIV patients with steady care, resulting in dramatic suppression of viral load. The death toll for this group has plunged from a peak of two million annual deaths in the early 2000s to fewer than 500,000 deaths in 2022, researchers say. Inspired by the INTE-Africa trial, Tanzania, which had for many years embraced infectious diseases as its priority in health policy and resources allocations, is undergoing a seismic shift in its primary health care services to address the new NCD crisis. The integration of HIV, diabetes and hypertension services has earned global recognition, as reflected in the NCD Alliance’s Spending Wisely report, which also found “evidence is strong that integrated services can deliver health impact.” The shift in Tanzania’s policy also aligns with the evolving strategy of the Global Fund dubbed Prioritization Framework Supporting Health Longevity Among People Living with HIV, which articulates the opportunities and priorities for integrated investments to prevents, identify and managed advanced HIV disease and NCDs, among other diseases, for the period of 2023-2025. The strategy calls for integrating NCD services into other services designed for people living with HIV, especially those over the age of 50. Countries are encouraged to align services with the WHO package of essential NCD disease interventions for primary health care focusing on cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes and early diagnosis of cancer. Global Fund specialist Dan Koros told Health Policy Watch that the Fund’s support for NCD Integration into HIV programs in Tanzania began in January 2024 with a grant of $115,075 – primarily for carrying out baseline assessment, developing protocols and training healthcare workers for the period of 2024-2026. The Global Fund investments aim to support integrated diagnosis and treatment of HIV positive adults over the age of 40 and on antiretroviral treatment, who are also receiving treatment for one or more NCD, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and mental health conditions. Anna Mlengu, who suffers from diabetes, consults a doctor at Hindul Mandal Hospital in Dar es Salaam. NCD’s – highest premature mortality is in LMICs Globally the NCDs are the leading cause of death, killing 41 million people each year-equivalent to 71% of all deaths worldwide. And the highest rates of premature mortality – that is deaths before the age of 70, are in low- and middle-income countries, particularly Africa. Across the WHO’s African region, patients suffering from diabetes and hypertension are neglected, with less than half remaining in care one year after diagnosis, leading to approximately two million deaths each year, medical researchers say. And when their disease condition is addressed later in life, it also makes treatment much more complex. Many elderly patients like Kashozi, suffering from diabetic ulcers and related complications, do not always get access to specialised care. “The ageing process affects immune function and slower wound healing, making the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers even harder,” says Zawadi Chiwanga, senior endocrinologist and lead surgeon in Kashozi’s case. “Diabetic ulcers can be particularly insidious, often manifesting silently without the knowledge of a patient until they reach an advanced stage,” Chiwanga told Health Policy Watch. Diabetes affects younger people too While traditionally Tanzanians perceived diabetes as a disease that primarily haunts the elderly, the city of Dar es Salaam, one of Africa’s fastest growing urban areas, bears witness to a different reality. From Tandale, a labyrinthine slum, to the upscale enclave of Masaki, favoured by Western diplomats, and further to Kariakoo, a business hub replete with fast- food joints, youth obesity is on the rise – accompanied by an alarming surge in diabetes cases. Out of the 613,210 patients screened for diabetes at MHN in the last six months, an estimated 165,566 individuals (27%), were diagnosed with diabetes, hospital records show. Along with the toll of co-infections, this silent crisis is attributed to poor dietary choices and lack of physical activity. In the suburb of Upanga in Dar es Salaam, 38-year-old Pragash Gupta, who was diagnosed with diabetes three years ago, routinely checks her blood glucose levels by pricking her fingers. Gupta, weighing 125kg and also recently diagnosed with high blood pressure and heart fibrillation, struggles to heed doctors’ call to make lifestyle changes, including adjusting her diet. “I check my blood glucose every morning and every night,” she says “I am supposed to do it four times, but sometimes my fingers hurt and I don’t do it as often.” Irene Masanja, an infectious diseases specialist at Bagamoyo district Hospital in Tanzania’s coastal region, says that the rising incidence of diabetes and hypertension, among HIV patients as well as in the general population, is alarming. “Early detection and intervention are key. We must empower healthcare providers and equip them with appropriate skills and knowledge to address interconnected health problems effectively,” she says. Image Credits: Courtesy Public Relations Department Muhimbili National Hospital, Muhidin Issa Michuzi, INTEAfrica. In Wake of Food Aid Workers’ Deaths, WHO Demands Stronger ‘Deconfliction’ Mechanism for Gaza Relief Missions 03/04/2024 Elaine Ruth Fletcher WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO’s Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Wednesday decried the deaths of seven aid workers by Israeli fire while delivering food aid to Palestinians in besieged northern Gaza, demanding a major revamp of “deconfliction” procedures so that aid missions could proceed safely and predictably. “WHO is horrified by the killing of 7 humanitarian workers from World Central Kitchen in Gaza on Monday. The work they were doing was saving lives, providing food to thousands of starving people,” said the director general at a press briefing. Responding to a blast of international criticism, Israel’s top military and political leadership expressed deep regret for the incident in which air force drones deliberately picked off, one by one, three cars carrying the seven aid workers affiliated with an organisation widely recognised even by Israelis as a neutral partner. The country pledged a high-level investigation of the incident. But Tedros said that the incident reflects systemic problems faced by virtually every agency mission WHO has conducted in Gaza in coordinating missions with Israel’s military through areas of Gaza that it now controls. Those problems are also putting its aid workers at risk almost daily from combat fire, as well as taking the lives of other innocent people in the past six months of war, Tedros and other senior WHO officials said. “The DG rightly highlights why we are all appalled by the killings of our colleagues, in clearly marked vehicles in a deconflicted area. It clearly shows that the deconfliction mechanism is not working,” said Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). “What is needed is an effective, transparent and workable deconfliction and notification mechanism. The UN has to be assured that convoys and facilities are not targeted. It means that assuring movement of aid in Gaza, including through checkpoints, is predictable, expedited, etc. That roads are operational and cleared.” Fraught with cancellations, delays and uncertainties Dr Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based office for the Occupied Palestinian Territories. In particular, WHO relief missions to northern Gaza, which Israel nominally controls although heavy pockets of fighting with Hamas continue – have been fraught with cancellations, delays and other uncertainties for months, Peeperkorn complained. “We see too many missions delayed or denied. It’s also making the missions which are delayed, and I’ve been on quite a few myself, more arduous and dangerous. You sometimes return at 11 o’clock at night, or past midnight. So it becomes unnecessarily dangerous.” “Even today, who my team was in an mission to the north, again, to deliver a few medical supplies, food and water, to Al-Ahli Hospital and Al-Sahabah Hospital in the north… They were, as was planned and agreed on, between 6 and 7 a.m. ready to go,” he recounted. “They went to the checkpoint, and just before the checkpoint, they’ve been waiting and waiting and waiting up till now. Now they had to return back to their to their guest houses.” Not an isolated incident Shell of WCK car that came under drone attack, with the NGOs identity clearly marked on its roof Along with the blast of international criticism, the WCK attack has been deplored widely inside Israel, where the organisation has been praised for having also delivered food aid to Israelis displaced by the Hamas attacks on Jewish communities around the perimeter of Gaza on 7 October. While the Israeli army has sought to portray the killings as a tragic, but isolated incident, critics say it reflects more systemic problems related not only to poor coordination of aid, but an expanding culture of “shoot first ask questions later.” Peeperkorn underlined that the attack also wasn’t an isolated incident for UN and WHO operations. “We shouldn’t forget that already in December, January, we have seen, unfortunately, attacks and sometimes the shooting at the UN vehicles,” he said. This included a mission to the north in which he participated in early December, he recalled. “There was an airstrike 150 meters from our car. The truck delivering medical supplies was shot at, the PRCS (Palestinian Red Crescent Society) people were shot at. And PRCS staff were actually arrested and detained for a while.” Painstaking detail for every mission prepared Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, in southern Gaza. Each WHO convoy to southern Gaza, and northward, requires painstaking preparation. Detailed planning is required for every mission WHO or its partners prepare. For WHO missions, not only international and local health workers, but also a security officer and an ordnance expert are typically included in the team as well. “It’s an enormous amount of work, and every mission that gets delayed, impeded or denied, that other missions cannot take place,” Peeperkorn said. “All of those details – the timing, the people on the missions, are shared through Israeli counterparts, and then there is agreement that the mission can take place at this hour,” he stressed. “You want to start this as early as possible. For some of the food transport, it’s even better to do that at night, before sunrise. But in the case of medical supplies, food or fuel for patients, we normally start a mission around 5 or 6 in the morning. …. Because there will always be delays, and you want to be back in daylight. A team sets out on the road only after it has received an OK from the Israeli army. “Then, normally, there’s a holding point at military checkpoints, where you have to wait again,” Peeperkorn said. “Most of the missions, there were always problems. Delays, delays, delays – and often denials in the end,” he said. “And the mission today was a good example – to bring a few medical supplies, food and water to those two hospitals in the north. “It was all agreed, they would leave at 6:30 to 7 am. First of all they don’t get a green light to go. And finally, they get a green light to go to the checkpoint…. “And then they waited before the checkpoint. And they wait and they wait and they wait. In the meantime, very little discussion. Nothing is going on. “They realize that even if they get a green light now, they can’t go to Al Sahaba anymore. They would only deliver supplies to Al Ahli hospital and then go back.” Eventually, after more waiting, they realise that “they will never be able to return [in time], and they have to cancel the mission.” Workable deconfliction “So what is a workable deconfliction mechanism?” Peeperkorn asked. “That routes are coordinated. That it’s a predictable mechanism. That the roads are going to be clear. And anyone who knows Gaza, know that there are a number of roads, which can be easily cleared and made operational. “So in a way, it’s a simple mechanism, and somehow, it has never properly worked.” Given the mass hunger that northern Gaza faces, followed by the near total destruction of Al Shifa Hospital, the area’s main health facility, over the past two weeks, those missions are needed now more than ever, Peeperkorn stressed. “There should be 50 missions going to the north every day. Multiple [missions] of food, water, shelter, and maybe one medical mission. That should be happening everywhere, including in the south,” said Peeperkorn. “And even if there’s active conflict going on, then you expect that humanitarian corridors are created, where the UN partners can safely deliver their aid and do their job. And clearly the horrific attack on WCK is clearly a sign that this is not working. “So I really do expect, whatever comes out now, that we get a functional deconfliction mechanism and a proper notification system and that the UN and partners can do their work.” Image Credits: AFP/TImes of Israel, WHO/EMRO. Health As a Driver of Innovation Not Just a Recipient 03/04/2024 Hans Henri P. Kluge An electronic blood sugar monitor makes it easier for people with diabetes to manage their disease. As WHO unveils S.A.R.A.H. (Smart AI Resource Assistant for Health), its new digital health promoter prototype powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI), and available in eight languages 24 hours a day, WHO’s Regional Director for Europe writes about harnessing innovation in health to help meet critical public health challenges, both now and in the future. Innovation has always been a driving force behind advancements in health, revolutionizing the way we prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases. And as we navigate through a rapidly evolving health landscape, embracing health innovation has become more crucial than ever. From cutting-edge technologies like mRNA vaccines to AI-driven diagnostics, the potential of innovation to transform healthcare is limitless. But for too long health has often been viewed as a passive beneficiary of innovation rather than a driver of it. It’s time to change this mentality and harness the power of innovation. The challenges we face, from global pandemics to rising chronic diseases, from a rapidly ageing population to the effects of climate change, demand creative solutions that prioritize the well-being of populations worldwide. Shifting mindsets to move health innovation needle Our sector – health – can and should be at the cutting edge of new and innovative solutions, driven by technology including AI, which is going to fundamentally change every aspect of human life over the coming century. In fact, the IMF predicts that 40% of jobs will be affected by AI in some shape or form over the coming years, including in health and care. Further, AI products and services are expected to contribute $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, more than the current output of China and India combined. However, while technological advancements have made significant strides in healthcare, social innovations and policies also play a crucial role in addressing the complex needs of diverse communities. Innovation in public health goes beyond technological breakthroughs; it involves harnessing creativity, collaboration, and sustainability, to promote equitable access to quality healthcare. To foster an environment conducive to innovation in public health, leaders and decision-makers must focus on responding to the needs of communities while closing the equity gap. We must shift the focus from solely economic returns to the broader public health impact of innovative solutions. By aligning policies with the goal of improving health outcomes for all, we can better address inequalities in healthcare access and deliver sustainable solutions that benefit society as a whole. Another strategic shift requires patients themselves to be co-creators and designers of innovation because patients are experts in their own right. They know how to navigate life living with cancer or diabetes or a physical/mental disability. Involving them in the full pathway of disease management will make solutions more relevant and sustainable, and encourage innovation at scale. Ecosystem approach As public health professionals, we are not always good at articulating how innovation meets health and societal needs. That’s why we need an ecosystem approach to innovation. By fostering collaborations between healthcare providers, technology companies, research institutions, and policymakers, a holistic ecosystem can be created to drive innovation in health. In Ireland, for example, the Health Ministry joined forces with the Department for Business, Enterprise, and Innovation to set up the Health Innovation Hub, an incubator for public health solutions. Health workers in the Health Innovation Hub spend half their time delivering care and the other half working with start-ups and health tech companies: a clear example of an ecosystem approach. Digital solutions to health, such as telemedicine, are already a reality in some countries. As we embrace innovation to tackle pressing global challenges, sustainability must remain at the core of our efforts. Innovations should not only address current needs but also contribute to long-term social, economic, and environmental sustainability. This requires a shift towards sustainable practices, circular economy models, and responsible innovation that minimizes negative impacts on both people and planet. Too often people tell me that striving for health equity is at odds with our market-driven societies; that equity somehow stifles innovation. I would strongly dispute that – there is no contradiction. But unfortunately, modern economics tends to focus only on improving efficiency – for example, getting more cancer screenings for the dollar, or squeezing the last ounce of productivity out of the health system. Equity – leaving no one behind – is not seen as the responsibility of the commercial sector but that of the state or the non-profit sector. This mindset also needs to change. A Wellbeing Economy values equity and not only revenue or “productivity”. It strives to make the world a safe and just place for humanity – and this is the true challenge for innovators. The future is already here Innovation for health brings together experts from diverse fields such as medicine, engineering, data science, and behavioural psychology. But as health is about where people live, love, work, and play, it’s also about transportation, urban planning, and agriculture. This interdisciplinary approach not only catalyses breakthrough discoveries but also nurtures a culture of cross-pollination, where ideas flourish, and boundaries are transcended – precisely the kind of culture that innovation needs to thrive. However, the pursuit of innovation for health is not without its hurdles. From regulatory barriers to financial constraints, from ethical dilemmas to data privacy concerns, the path to innovation is fraught with challenges that require careful navigation. Nevertheless, these challenges should not deter us but rather galvanize our resolve to push the boundaries of what is possible. By fostering a culture of innovation, nurturing creative minds, and empowering diverse stakeholders to collaborate, we can address the most pressing challenges of our time. Embracing emerging technologies, exploring new frontiers in science and medicine, and prioritizing social innovations will pave the way for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future and help countries in the hard-pressed challenge of reaching the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. We are well and truly in an era of ever accelerating innovation in health, bringing with it boundless possibilities for improving our collective health and wellbeing, generating jobs, and growing our economies. But health leaders are not yet fully equipped to navigate this new world, so full of exciting potential, with confidence. The health sector must be ready and equipped to embrace innovation across all dimensions, strengthening health and wellbeing. Or run the risk of being left behind, squandering the opportunities of today and jeopardizing the very future of health itself. The choice is clear. Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge is WHO Regional Director for Europe Innovation ecosystem for public health Digital health – WHO/Europe AI ethics and governance guidance Image Credits: Uka Borrgeaard/ WHO, Juliana Tan/ WHO, WHO. Uganda’s Constitutional Court Greenlights Draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 03/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Uganda’s Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera (centre) delivers the Constitutional Court ruling. Uganda’s Constitutional Court ruled on Wednesday that the country’s draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 complies with the country’s Constitution in all but four aspects. “We decline to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety neither would we grant a permanent injunction against its enforcement,” Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera, told the Kampala courtroom and a capacity Zoom audience of 500. The four sections that were struck down by the five-judge panel – 3 (2c), 9, 11 (2d) and 14 – were “inconsistent with right to health, privacy and freedom of religion”, according to the court. UPDATE: The Constitutional Court has declined to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety.#NTVNews#AntiHomosexualAct pic.twitter.com/nQGIoe3sUA — NTV UGANDA (@ntvuganda) April 3, 2024 “The nullified sections had criminalised the letting of premises for use for homosexual purposes, the failure by anyone to report acts of homosexuality to the police for appropriate action, and the engagement in acts of homosexuality by anyone which results into the other persons contracting a terminal illness,” according to a statement from the court. Buteera said that the mandatory reporting to authorities of people suspected of having committed homosexual offences violated individual rights. While the court has struck down the possibility of landlords being imprisoned for renting premises to homosexuals, it has maintained that prison terms of up to 20 years for journalists “promoting homosexuality” were legitimate. In delivering the unanimous judgement, Buteera said that constraints on the media aligned with sections of the country’s Communications Act and Anti-Pornography Act, which “aim to uphold societal morals by limiting the use of media to publish or broadcast offensive material”. The Act’s legitimacy was contested by 22 Ugandan human rights advocates including Member of Parliament Fox Oywelowo Odoi (the only MP to vote against the Act), legal academics Prof. Sylvia Tamale and Rutaro Robert and Bishop James Lubega Banda. They said that it violated various constitutional rights, including the right to privacy and freedom from discrimination, as well as going against Uganda’s international human rights commitments. Frank Mugisha, of Sexual Minorities Uganda and Convening for Equality co-convener, described the ruling as “wrong and deplorable”, and called on “all governments, UN partners, and multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the Global Fund to likewise intensify their demand that this law be struck down”. “This ruling should result in further restrictions to funding for Uganda – no donor should be funding anti-LGBTQ+ hate and human rights violations,” said Mugisha, one of Uganda’s most prominent LGBTQ activists. Nicholas Opiyo of human rights group Chapter Four Uganda, said his organisation “vehemently disagrees” with the court’s finding and the basis on which it was reached. “We approached the court expecting it to apply the law in defence of human rights and not rely on public sentiments, and vague cultural values arguments,” said Opiyo. Life sentence and death penalty Protests have been held worldwide in support of the Ugandan LGBTI community as it faces attack. The Anti-Homosexuality Act introduces “the offence of homosexuality”, with a potential life sentence for a same-sex “sexual act”. It also allows the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”, including sex acts with children, disabled people or those drugged against their will, or committed by people living with HIV – actions that are already criminalised by other laws. Since the Act was passed last May, the World Bank has suspended new loans to Uganda and the US President’s Emergency Plan to Fight AIDS (Pepfar) has declined to advance plans for the country. There has also been widespread condemnation of the law. Buteera claimed that the Act had been passed “against the backdrop of the recruitment of children into the practice of homosexuality. That is the mischief that Section 11 [dealing with the “promotion of homosexuality”] of the Act seeks to address.” ‘Absence of global consensus’ on LGBTQ rights The court presented seven points as the basis for its decision, including that “sister jurisdictions” have “decriminalised consensual homosexuality between adults in private space”. However, it referred to the absence of global consensus “regarding non-discrimination based sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC)”. “This is reflected in the fact that to date non-discrimination on the basis of the SOGIESC variables has not explicitly found its way into international human rights treaties. Instead, it has been ‘vetoed’ by a bloc of resistant (UN) member states that has prevented the adoption of a binding declaration or similar instrument to strengthen protections for LGBTI human rights,” according to the court. The court also referred to conflicts between “a universal understanding of human rights and respecting the diversity and freedom of human cultures” and between “individuals’ right to self-determination, self-perception and bodily autonomy, on the one hand; and the communal or societal right to social, political and cultural self-determination” on the other. Finally, it described the Anti-Homosexuality Act as “a reflection of the socio-cultural realities of the Ugandan society, and was passed by an overwhelming majority of the democratically elected representatives of the Ugandan citizens”. Win for government Dr Adrian Jjuukho, Ugandan human rights lawyer and executive director of Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF), which was one of the petitioners against the Act, described the ruling as “only intended to please donors in the health sector so that they can continue to provide the funds that are much needed while sacrificing LGBTI persons in the process”. “The Court has nullified provisions that directly impede health service provision including reporting obligations, and where the victim acquires a terminal illness. This clears the way for health funding but does not actually clear the way for proper service provision,” said Jjuukho, writing on X (Twitter). 1. The Constitutional Court just delivered what would be a win-win judgment – intended to please all parties. Unfortunately, this only pleases one party – the government, which will most likely get its World Bank and Global Fund money as the LGBT community continues to be muzzled — Dr. Adrian Jjuuko (@jjuukoa) April 3, 2024 In a guarded statement, UNAIDS Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa Anne Githuku-Shongwe, said that “evidence shows that criminalizing populations most at risk of HIV, such as the LGBTQ+ communities, obstructs access to life-saving health and HIV services, which undermines public health and the overall HIV response in the country.” “To achieve the goal of ending the AIDS pandemic by 2030, it is vital to ensure that everyone has equal access to health services without fear,” she added. UNAIDS provided evidence in support of the petitioners on certain clauses via an amicus brief. Meanwhile, Ugandan feminist lawyer Sunshine Fionah Komusana told Health Policy Watch that “the ruling impacts everyone”. “With the kind of government we have, I don’t know how anyone would be celebrating, knowing very well the different tags they use to deny people freedom of expression and association.,” said Komusana. “Anti-human rights groups are gaining ground and before we know it, these kinds of legislation will be feeding into retraction of several other rights. See examples of reintroduction of legislation to legalise female genital mutilation and child marriages in some countries. These legislations harm all of us.” Uganda’s laws were robust enough to address paedophilia, and they already criminalised LGBTQIA+ people; this new law will affect you, political opponent candidates and your children. It is far-reaching and ambiguous. Anyone can be guilty. #ResistAHA23 pic.twitter.com/trWllorXf6 — Uganda Feminist Forum (UFF) (@UgFeministForum) June 29, 2023 Hundreds of people have already been arrested and attacked since the Act was introduced last May. In one case, a man was attacked in his home by a group of men one night. He was beaten and some of his property burnt by the mob, which accused him of being a homosexual. In a similar incident, a lesbian was attacked by two men in her home. She had been evicted by her landlord on the grounds of homosexuality but did not have the resources to move. International reaction to the court’s ruling will no doubt be keenly watched by countries contemplating their own anti-LGBTQ laws, such as Ghana, Kenya, South Sudan and Tanzania. In February, Ghana’s Parliament unanimously passed one of the world’s most draconian anti-LGBTIQ Bills which includes a mandatory three-year prison sentence for a person who simply “identifies” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or queer”. However, the president has yet to sign it into law. Image Credits: Alisdare Hickson/Flickr. Continued Mpox Outbreak Leads US to Re-examine Smallpox Readiness 03/04/2024 Sophia Samantaroy Although smallpox has been eradicated, it is possib;le to recreate it from published genomes. In the wake of surging mpox cases in the DRC and the emergence of novel orthopoxviruses, the US needs to rapidly bolster its smallpox readiness, preparedness, and response, according to a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report brought together experts from across the country to critically evaluate the state of smallpox vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics, known as medical countermeasures (MCMs), in the event of an outbreak. Improving MCMs is crucial for enhancing the nation’s ability to combat a smallpox outbreak or deliberate attack, the report emphasizes. It also stresses the importance of fortifying public health and healthcare systems to swiftly and effectively respond, including mechanisms for rapid vaccine distribution. An ‘evolving bio-threat and technology landscape’ With advancements in genome sequencing and editing technology, it is now possible to recreate live smallpox virus from published genomes, the report warns. US population changes and advancements in gene editing and synthesis technologies have drastically altered the potential for a smallpox outbreak or attack in recent years. But these technologies significantly raise the risk of accidental or intentional release, challenging readiness planning and potentially altering the epidemiology and clinical presentations of the disease. The report notes that even if all existing collections of the virus were destroyed, reemergence is still a threat. Despite the risks, the report underscores the necessity of continued research involving live variola virus for developing and enhancing smallpox MCMs. This research is essential for creating more effective therapies, validating vaccine and treatment efficacy, and establishing animal models for research purposes. Research using these viruses can also fill gaps in our fundamental understanding of orthopoxvirus biology, ecology, evolution, transmission, and disease onset in humans. A call for MCM research and development Three main categories of MCMs need improvement: diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics. More accurate diagnostic tests to detect smallpox and related viruses at earlier stages is paramount. Vaccine safety is also an issue, and the report calls for research into vaccines that can be used across different populations and that are available as a single dose. “Developing new smallpox vaccines that use a multi-vaccine platform – which use common vaccine vectors, manufacturing ingredients, and processes – would improve the capacity for rapid production and reduce the need for stockpiling.” Lastly, the report advocates for safer and more diversified therapeutics, such as antivirals with different and diverse targets, mechanisms, and routes of administration, to supplement existing antivirals. Vulnerabilities: too few manufacturers The smallpox vaccine protects against mpox. The report concluded that the small number of manufacturers capable of producing smallpox medical countermeasures is a specific vulnerability, and that there is currently insufficient capacity to scale production in the event of a large outbreak or attack. Logistics and supply chain management planning is critical, as is planning for regulatory responsiveness. Clinical and public health guidance also needs to be updated to reflect new data and medical countermeasures so that health care providers and others on the front line of public health have the capability and capacity to respond to smallpox. The need for global cooperation Both the COVID-19 pandemic and mpox outbreaks revealed gaps in the US’s ability to respond to new infectious diseases. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the ability of US public health and health care systems to adapt and respond to an unfamiliar pathogen. Mpox, on the other hand, showed the challenges of rapidly making diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics available at scale. Furthermore, the mpox outbreak brought to light the lack of diverse smallpox therapeutics options. Currently, standard research methods rely on challenge studies in animals to understand MCM efficacy in humans, leading to issues with accurately understanding the safety and efficacy in humans. “The gaps in our ability to respond to a new infectious disease were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent mpox outbreak,” said committee chair Prof Larry Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law and professor of medicine at Georgetown University. “It is vital to prioritize research into the development of safer and more effective smallpox diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, make judicious choices in stockpiling, and have modern, well-practiced, and adaptable plans for responding in the event of a smallpox outbreak,” added Gostin, who is also director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Research and development for these MCMs needs to not only consider the actual device or product, but also the ability to “deploy at scale” and equitably to meet the challenges of public acceptance. The report urges effective risk communication for vaccines, as the same challenges with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation could occur in a smallpox outbreak. While the report primarily focused on US readiness and response capabilities, it does note the impact of growing global interdependence in detecting and containing potential smallpox outbreaks. “The COVID-19 pandemic and pox multi-country outbreak, both declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) by WHO, underscore the need for further domestic global coordination for preparedness and response against novel pathogens including orthopoxvirus events,” note the report authors. This means preemptively supporting international MCM capacity as any US response will be “significantly affected” by the ability of other countries to detect and surveil. The report notes that global solidarity is a key component to rapidly identify, contain, respond, and ensure equitable MCM allocation in a smallpox event. Preparedness for similar viruses Smallpox-related viruses such as mpox, Alaskapox, and cowpox are increasingly found in humans, magnifying the need for medical countermeasures that can detect, treat, and prevent these diseases. The report notes that most mpox therapeutics were developed because of investments in smallpox therapeutics. “Direct investment in developing therapeutics targeting circulating orthopoxviruses could similarly benefit smallpox therapeutic preparedness and would likely have more immediate utility and potentially achieve commercial viability.” Image Credits: Isao Arita/ WHO. Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Youth in ‘Forgotten’ Afghanistan Need Community-Based Systems to Address Drug Abuse and Mental Health Disorders 04/04/2024 Manija Mirzaie Afghan opium poppy cultivation sustains many rual communities – and keeps many in the adiction vicious cycle The ‘forgotten crisis’ of Afghanistan has exposed more and more young Afghans to mental health problems and drug abuse amid dwindling donor support and crumbling healthcare under the Taliban regime, said experts at a high-level side event at the recent meeting of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs in Vienna Austria. Since the Taliban imposed a drug ban in April 2022, opium poppy cultivation in the war-ravaged country has dropped by around 95%, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). But experts claim that drug abuse, particularly among the youth, is getting worse – and is being compounded by a lack of treatment. The WHO estimates that around 2.9 million people abuse drugs in the country, while nine million have mental health issues in a population of around 38,3 million. Holistic approach At the side-event on “Mental health and substance use disorders in Afghanistan”, hosted by the World Health Organization (WHO), UNODC, the European Union (EU) and the Japanese government, stakeholders said the rapidly deteriorating socio-political environment in the country poses new challenges that require a more holistic approach and engagement with the Taliban authorities to save millions of lives. Jean-Luc Lemahieu, UNODC’s director of policy analysis and public affairs, said that many youngsters trying to escape the Taliban’s oppressive system of governance are vulnerable to drug abuse and exploitation, including radicalization. To confront those threats, a system of community-based programmes anchored around existing primary health care services, should be developed, he and other experts speaking at the session emphasized. Those need to address both drug addiction and offer “active livelihood support and vocational skill training.” Opium poppy farming in Afghanistan dramatically decreased after a 2022 drug ban. UN officials noted that the “near-total contraction of the opiate economy is expected to have far-reaching consequences” for rural communities who relied on income from cultivating opium. “Farmers’ income from selling the 2023 opium harvest to traders fell by more than 92 per cent from an estimated $1,360 million for the 2022 harvest to $110 million in 2023,” according to UNODC. The WHO estimates that 23.7 million Afghan people will need humanitarian assistance this year as economic conditions in the country deteriorate. In addition, 9.5 million people have no or very limited access to healthcare. Experts at the event warned that mental health and drug addiction can have far reaching public health consequences, including higher mortality rates, infectious diseases like HIV, hepatitis as well as diminished productivity. Social tensions Raffaella Iodice, Chargée d’Affaires and deputy head of the EU Delegation to Afghanistan, told the conference that mental health issues and drug addiction can trigger social tensions and negatively influence stability in communities. “Investing in drug demand reduction and mental health, quality, evidence-based and comprehensive treatment and prevention can pave the way for more sustainable and resilient communities that are critical for advancing the overall economic situation,” she said. The EU is supporting a 100-bed Female and Children Drug Addiction Treatment Centre (DATC) in Kabul, which was established in December 2023. It assists mothers and children up to the age of 17, offering “child counselling sessions that surpass conventional education, acting as a crucial pillar of support for young minds navigating the complexities of addiction”, according to a report from the WHO EMRO region. Expanding outpatient services at primary health care level Abdul Hakim, who was enrolled in a drug addiction treatment centre in Kabul eight months ago after 20 years of drug addiction, told Health Policy Watch that the easy availability of drugs was one of main reasons why many return to addiction after treatment and recovery. “If the authorities collect the drugs and dealers from the market, we will recover and stop using drugs,” he said. Kabul city resident Gholam Ali, whose son became addicted to drugs eight years ago, told Health Policy Watch that his son has been treated several times, but easy access to drugs has made him addicted to it again. “There was no clinic left that I did not take my son to. He is treated for one or two months in each clinic, but when he leaves the clinic, there are drug addicts and drugs available outside, and he turns to drugs again,” said Ali. Anja Busse, a UNODC programme officer working on prevention, treatment and rehabilitation, said that the treatment model that exists in Afghanistan right now, based around clinics in large cities, is unable to meet the needs in the sprawling country, where rural needs are neglected. “The outpatient services in the community would need to be widely expanded and to be integrated in the community based health care approaches to have a continuum of care,” said Busse. “ The reduced availability of previously widely used opioids at local markets has potentially increased risks for people with drug dependence due to increased levels of police interactions.” Afghanistan’s health system system has been struggling to meet mounting demands amid dwindling aid and restrictions. Stigma is also a problem. “Whether we are facing a mental health patient or substance use disorder client, we are facing a major stigma issue and most of the communities,” said Dr Vail Al-Raas, the mental health and psychosocial support coordinator at the International Medical Corps in Afghanistan. She suggested the mental health treatment programs should be integrated into existing public health primary care programmes to use existing infrastructure and resources. “This can give [these programmes] a good chance to expand and be implemented on the ground, and interest has recently been shown by some donors.” Image Credits: Resolute Support Media, UNODC. Access Battle for New Generation Obesity Drugs 04/04/2024 Zuzanna Stawiska The new generation of obesity drugs have reached sky-high popularity – and command high prices. Demand for diabetes drugs such as Wegovy, Ozempic, Rybelsis and Trulicity has soared since they have been clinically proven to help weight loss – but they are massively overpriced in the US and unavailable in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), according to Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). The mark-up for these drugs – called glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists (GLP-1) – in the US is almost 40,000%, according to a paper published in JAMA last week authored by Yale University’s Dr Melissa Barber and MSF’s Dr Dzintars Gotham, Dr Helen Bygrave and Christa Cepuch. The authors modelled the manufacturing costs of a variety of diabetes medications and added a modest profit margin. “MSF’s study estimates that GLP-1s for diabetes could be sold at a profit for just $0.89 per month, compared to the price of $95 per month charged in Brazil, $115 per month charged in South Africa, $230 charged in Latvia and at least $353 charged in the US [based on Medicare price], which is a 39,562% markup over what the estimated generic price could be,” according to MSF’s press release. In fact, the US drug costs are usually much higher, reaching as much as about $1000 monthly. Novo Nordisk makes both Ozempic and Wegovy (which contains a higher dose of the active ingredient, semaglutide, than Ozempic), while Eli Lilly makes Trulicity. Some are oral pills and others are injections. US Senator Bernie Sanders has called on Novo Nordisk to lower the price of Ozempic Wegovy in the US to no more than what they charge for this drug in Canada. “The American people are sick and tired of paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs while the pharmaceutical industry enjoys huge profits,” said Sanders in a statement. “As a result of a major grassroots movement, Novo Nordisk did the right thing by recently reducing the price of its insulin products by some 75% in America. Novo Nordisk, a company that made nearly $15 billion in profits last year, must now do the right thing with respect to Ozempic and Wegovy,” added Sanders, who chairs the US Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. FDA approval for weight management While GLP-1 drugs were made to treat diabetes, in 2021 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Wegovy for weight management in people with a body-mass index (BMI) of over 30, or a BMI of over 27 with underlying conditions such as high blood pressure. “Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly are the only producers of these GLP-1s today, and their intellectual property barriers on the drugs and injection devices block any generic manufacturing that could help drive prices down,” MSF notes. “The corporations have not even announced a price for low- and middle-income countries, nor have they licensed these drugs so that generic manufacturers could make them, which would help to meet global demand and drive prices down,” MSF says, noting that because they are now being used for weight loss in high-income countries, the companies are “unable to meet the massive demand”. Co-author Christa Cepuch, pharmacist coordinator at MSF’s Access Campaign, describes the new drugs as “an absolute game changer for people living with diabetes”, but cannot be accessed by people in LMICs. “Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk can in no way supply the world with the amount of these medicines needed to meet global demand, so they must immediately relinquish their stranglehold and allow them to be produced by more manufacturers around the world,” said Cepuch. The steep price of the drugs is hampering access even in the US, although the country’s federal health insurance programme, Medicare, recently struck a deal with Novo Nordisk, to cover the cost of Wegovy – but strictly for preventing heart attacks and strokes not for weight loss, Reuters reported. “The American people are sick and tired of paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs while the pharmaceutical industry enjoys huge profits,” said sen. Bernie Sanders, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on the US cost of GLP-1s. “Ozempic has the potential to be a game changer in the diabetes and obesity epidemics in America. But, if we do not substantially reduce the price of this drug, millions who need it will be unable to afford it,” he continued. Obesity’s heavy burden The GLP-1 drugs stimulate insulin production and feeling of satiety (fullness), promote weight loss, lower blood pressure and cholesterol, improve blood flow in the heart and uptake of glucose in the muscles, according to the US National Institute of Health. Side effects can include commonly nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, stomach pain, headache or stomach flu, and less often, depression with suicidal thoughts or kidney failure. Doctors warn that they need to be taken alongside a healthy diet and exercise. The US accounts for almost three-quarters of the sale of Novo-Nordisk’s Ozempic, Wegovy and Rybelsus, according to Pew Research Center. The country has an adult obesity rate of 42%, according to the American CDC, one of the highest in the world. Despite steep prices and side-effects, GLP-1s have become wildly popular in the last few years, especially in the US. Obesity is a growing problem worldwide, affecting 890 million adults – 16% of the global population – in 2022, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). The prevalence of this condition more than doubled between 1990 and 2022. Global costs of obesity and overweight are predicted to reach $3 trillion per year by 2030 and more than $18 trillion by 2060 at the current rate. In relation to obesity, World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus recently stressed that the private sector “must be held accountable for the health impacts of their products” as Health Policy Watch reported – a reference to the impact of products such as ultra-processed food and sugary drinks on obesity. Being overweight and obese increases people’s risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and cancer, WHO highlights, also affecting bone health and reproduction and increase the risk of certain cancers. Both conditions can be affected by gene composition, but are mostly a result of an imbalance of energy intake (diet) and energy expenditure (physical activity). As such, are largely dependent on the options the environment offers. “Obesity is a societal rather than an individual responsibility, with the solutions to be found through the creation of supportive environments and communities,” WHO says. The analytics platform, Airfinity, argues that it would be beneficial for public health to administer Wegovy to not only to diabetics type 2 patients, as the current Medicare deal allows, but to all people in the US with a BMI over 40. If 60% of people living with obesity and 40% of those of a BMI above 35 received the drugs, this could prevent as many as 300 000 heart failures in the US by 2030, according to Airfinity World distribution of obesity. Safe the extreme numbers for small populations (on the right), some Middle Eastern countries and the US show highest percentages. The demand for the Novo Nordisk drugs has more than quadrupled between 2019 and 2021, reaching 8.2 million prescriptions. In fact, the demand was so high that it caused many months of shortages in the US, making it difficult for many to obtain their doses, Reuters reports. Even those who do not have any medical reason to take GLP-1s often ask their doctors for a prescription. The drugs, seen as a miraculous way to achieveachieve wards a perfect body shape, feed hope that impossible beauty standards can be attained with a weekly injection. Despite the surge in demand for these drugs, it’s important to recognize that they alone cannot address the societal challenges associated with obesity. According to the WHO website, “Stopping the rise in obesity demands multisectoral actions such as food manufacturing, marketing and pricing and others that seek to address the wider determinants of health (such as poverty reduction and urban planning).” “While we are unaware of the analysis used in the [MSF] study, we have always recognized the need for continuous evaluation of innovation and affordability levers to support greater access of our products,” said Novo Nordisk in a statement. “We continue to support greater health equity to those in need of diabetes treatment and care.” Image Credits: Chemist4u, Pew Research Center. Tanzania Merges HIV and Diabetes Care to Tackle NCD Crisis 04/04/2024 Kizito Makoye A diabetic patient with kidney complications receiving dialysis treatment at the Muhimbili National Hospital in Non-communicable diseases like hypertension and diabetes have emerged as serious health crises in developing countries, as HIV was a decade ago. New models of primary health care that combine NCD and HIV care are catching on – and Tanzania is implementing this approach. DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania – Lying on a neatly made bed at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Zaituni Kashozi is recovering from surgery to amputate her gnarled toes that were infected by diabetic ulcers. Wrapped in iodine-stained bandage, her left foot dangles on a string attached to an aluminium bar that helps to propel her feeble blood circulation. The 74-year-old, who has grappled with diabetes for three decades, woke up to a grim reality a year ago when insidious infections took root, forcing her to go under the surgeon’s scalpel. “I don’t feel any pain on my feet. All the sense of touch is gone. Even if you prick me with a needle, I won’t feel it. What a terrible disease,” Kashozi laments. Within the walls of this 1,500-bed medical facility, the toll of diabetes is strikingly evident. Ward after ward echoes with the woes of chronic foot ulcers even blindness – a reflection of the toll diabetes is taking on the urban populace. Diabetes, a chronic metabolic disease, poses a serious health threat that can affect the heart, blood vessels, eyes, kidneys and nerves. An estimated 12.8% of the population had diabetes by 2021 – up from around 2.8% in a decade. However, cardiovascular disease such as strokes and heart attacks – often driven by hypertension – is the biggest NCD killer in the country. Many people are unaware that they have either hypertension or diabetes until very late. The elderly, like Kashozi, bear a huge burden of NCDs, and around 90% of those aged 50 and above navigate the labyrinth of health challenges without the safety net of health insurance, forcing them to dart between hospitals frantically seeking elusive medical care. HIV and NCD management under one roof On the other side of the city, Halfani Ali, a 53-year-old father of five, is struggling with the dual challenges of HIV/AIDS and diabetes. Since his HIV diagnosis in 2003, Ali has been receiving care and medication at various health centres across the city. However, in 2013, Ali’s life took an unexpected turn when he was diagnosed with diabetes. This dual burden of disease has presented a complex challenge, forcing him to juggle HIV and diabetes appointments at two different health centres. Recognizing the struggles faced by individuals like Ali, the Temeke Regional Referral Hospital in Dar es Salaam (TRRH) integrated health care for NCDs within the ambit of HIV services in 2023. Now individuals like Ali can manage coexisting conditions like diabetes and hypertension under the same roof. “I am very happy because I get all my medication at Temeke Hospital. I don’t have to travel all the way to Kariakoo to see a diabetes specialist,” says Ali, reflecting the relief he has experienced with the integrated approach. A health worker takes blood sample from Sultani Ally Kessy to test for diabetes during a diabetes camp at Temeke Regional Referral Hospital. Maria Bitwale, a senior oncologist at Temeke Hospital, says many HIV patients with diabetes are now seeking treatment, and the integrated approach is helping to deter potential health crisis triggered by diabetic complications. On a bright Saturday morning, Ali approaches the physician’s desk where his examination unfolds meticulously. Bitwale, armed with a patellar hammer, probes the nuances of his nerves, safeguarding against the perils of diabetic complications. Ali’s eyes light up as he recounts the doctor’s advice on nerve function control and a prescribed diet, ensuring he remains in robust health. In this amalgamation of medical expertise and personal resilience, Ali’s story is testimony to the success of integrated healthcare approach for killer diabetes, HIV and hypertension – diseases which previously could have led to a death sentence, alone or together. HIV is an entry point for NCD care In Tanzania, over 1.4 million people out of the country’s 61 million population are living with HIV. Of these, an estimated 29% have hypertension and 13% have diabetes. And it is these latter diseases that are now the main causes of death in Tanzanians living with HIV today. Integrating up NCDs care into HIV services, which are widely available at the primary health care level, is the one new model being used to diagnose, prevent and manage leading chronic diseases in a cost-effective manner. John Njingu, Tanzania’s Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Health, emphasises that integration of NCDs into primary healthcare facilities nationwide, extending to HIV-targeted clinics, where the screening and management of NCDs are offered to people with or without HIV under one roof. “We want to bring better health care services to the people at lower cost to the service providers and the patients themselves,” he told Health Policy Watch in an interview. The NCD response in Tanzania took a major leap forward in 2019 on World Diabetes Day, when a new National NCD Prevention and Control Programme was launched by Tanzania’s Prime Minister, Kassim Majaliwa. The NCD strategy has been rolled out in 700 primary health care clinics in 26 regions across Tanzania, 245 of them in the first stage. These PHC centres have been provided with basic NCD diagnostic equipment, and over 3,000 health care staff working at the centres have been trained in basic NCD care. The new programme builds on several years of effort by the Ministry of Health and national stakeholders to establish the necessary platform for NCD services to reach communities. The new strategy has been supported by a range of national as well as international partners, including World Health Organization (WHO), the Global Fund, the US President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and UNAIDS. The WHO guidelines call for HIV-NCD service integration across the continuum of care as does the 2021 Political Declaration of the UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting on HIV and AIDS. But there is still a long way to go, as the country has a total of 8,549 primary, secondary and tertiary heath facilities, according to the Ministry of Health. ‘Unprecedented’ in sub-Saharan Africa “What we have seen unfolding in Tanzania with basic NCD services for very common conditions such as diabetes and hypertension now reaching primary care across the country at this scale is arguably unprecedented in a sub-Saharan African context,” says Bent Lautrup-Nielsen, head of global advocacy at the World Diabetes Foundation (WDF). WDF began supporting NCD interventions in the country two decades ago, and has played a key supporting role in the new NCD programme launch. “With the strong results on NCDs achieved by the Ministry of Health, the President’s Office for Regional Administration of Local Government and key national partners such as Tanzania Diabetes Association and Tanzania NCD Alliance, the prospect of integrated primary care with NCDs becoming part of routine services everywhere alongside HIV, TB and maternal and newborn care are now quite promising,” said Lautrup-Nielsen. The INTE-Africa research team and stakeholders in Tanzania New research findings demonstrating the benefits of integration also have helped pave the way for broader change. In a ground-breaking study dubbed INTE-Africa, conducted in Tanzania and Uganda in 2022, scientists documented the benefits of merging and decentralising services for HIV, diabetes, and hypertension in terms of disease management and cost-savings. The study, published in The Lancet in 2023, found that integrated management resulted in a 75% higher rate of retention in care for people with HIV and one or more NCD conditions; did not adversely affect viral suppression rates among people with HIV; and was cost-saving in terms of the health services provided. The researchers randomly allocated 32 health facilities (17 in Uganda and 15 in Tanzania) serving 7,028 eligible patients, to integrated care or standard care groups. In the integrated care group, participants with HIV, diabetes or hypertension, were managed by the same health workers, used the same pharmacy, and had uniform medical records, registration and laboratory services. In the standard care group, patients attended separate standalone clinics for each condition, following the standard practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Data collection was conducted at baseline, as well as months six and 12. Retention was assessed through routine clinic attendance and track-and-trace procedures. Roadmap for policymakers The study’s findings lay out a roadmap for policymakers, not just in Tanzania and Uganda, but more widely across Africa for scaling up integrated care for conditions such as HIV, diabetes, and hypertension, saving money while providing effective care. The idea of anchoring such care in HIV clinics is based on the success in providing HIV patients with steady care, resulting in dramatic suppression of viral load. The death toll for this group has plunged from a peak of two million annual deaths in the early 2000s to fewer than 500,000 deaths in 2022, researchers say. Inspired by the INTE-Africa trial, Tanzania, which had for many years embraced infectious diseases as its priority in health policy and resources allocations, is undergoing a seismic shift in its primary health care services to address the new NCD crisis. The integration of HIV, diabetes and hypertension services has earned global recognition, as reflected in the NCD Alliance’s Spending Wisely report, which also found “evidence is strong that integrated services can deliver health impact.” The shift in Tanzania’s policy also aligns with the evolving strategy of the Global Fund dubbed Prioritization Framework Supporting Health Longevity Among People Living with HIV, which articulates the opportunities and priorities for integrated investments to prevents, identify and managed advanced HIV disease and NCDs, among other diseases, for the period of 2023-2025. The strategy calls for integrating NCD services into other services designed for people living with HIV, especially those over the age of 50. Countries are encouraged to align services with the WHO package of essential NCD disease interventions for primary health care focusing on cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes and early diagnosis of cancer. Global Fund specialist Dan Koros told Health Policy Watch that the Fund’s support for NCD Integration into HIV programs in Tanzania began in January 2024 with a grant of $115,075 – primarily for carrying out baseline assessment, developing protocols and training healthcare workers for the period of 2024-2026. The Global Fund investments aim to support integrated diagnosis and treatment of HIV positive adults over the age of 40 and on antiretroviral treatment, who are also receiving treatment for one or more NCD, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and mental health conditions. Anna Mlengu, who suffers from diabetes, consults a doctor at Hindul Mandal Hospital in Dar es Salaam. NCD’s – highest premature mortality is in LMICs Globally the NCDs are the leading cause of death, killing 41 million people each year-equivalent to 71% of all deaths worldwide. And the highest rates of premature mortality – that is deaths before the age of 70, are in low- and middle-income countries, particularly Africa. Across the WHO’s African region, patients suffering from diabetes and hypertension are neglected, with less than half remaining in care one year after diagnosis, leading to approximately two million deaths each year, medical researchers say. And when their disease condition is addressed later in life, it also makes treatment much more complex. Many elderly patients like Kashozi, suffering from diabetic ulcers and related complications, do not always get access to specialised care. “The ageing process affects immune function and slower wound healing, making the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers even harder,” says Zawadi Chiwanga, senior endocrinologist and lead surgeon in Kashozi’s case. “Diabetic ulcers can be particularly insidious, often manifesting silently without the knowledge of a patient until they reach an advanced stage,” Chiwanga told Health Policy Watch. Diabetes affects younger people too While traditionally Tanzanians perceived diabetes as a disease that primarily haunts the elderly, the city of Dar es Salaam, one of Africa’s fastest growing urban areas, bears witness to a different reality. From Tandale, a labyrinthine slum, to the upscale enclave of Masaki, favoured by Western diplomats, and further to Kariakoo, a business hub replete with fast- food joints, youth obesity is on the rise – accompanied by an alarming surge in diabetes cases. Out of the 613,210 patients screened for diabetes at MHN in the last six months, an estimated 165,566 individuals (27%), were diagnosed with diabetes, hospital records show. Along with the toll of co-infections, this silent crisis is attributed to poor dietary choices and lack of physical activity. In the suburb of Upanga in Dar es Salaam, 38-year-old Pragash Gupta, who was diagnosed with diabetes three years ago, routinely checks her blood glucose levels by pricking her fingers. Gupta, weighing 125kg and also recently diagnosed with high blood pressure and heart fibrillation, struggles to heed doctors’ call to make lifestyle changes, including adjusting her diet. “I check my blood glucose every morning and every night,” she says “I am supposed to do it four times, but sometimes my fingers hurt and I don’t do it as often.” Irene Masanja, an infectious diseases specialist at Bagamoyo district Hospital in Tanzania’s coastal region, says that the rising incidence of diabetes and hypertension, among HIV patients as well as in the general population, is alarming. “Early detection and intervention are key. We must empower healthcare providers and equip them with appropriate skills and knowledge to address interconnected health problems effectively,” she says. Image Credits: Courtesy Public Relations Department Muhimbili National Hospital, Muhidin Issa Michuzi, INTEAfrica. In Wake of Food Aid Workers’ Deaths, WHO Demands Stronger ‘Deconfliction’ Mechanism for Gaza Relief Missions 03/04/2024 Elaine Ruth Fletcher WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO’s Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Wednesday decried the deaths of seven aid workers by Israeli fire while delivering food aid to Palestinians in besieged northern Gaza, demanding a major revamp of “deconfliction” procedures so that aid missions could proceed safely and predictably. “WHO is horrified by the killing of 7 humanitarian workers from World Central Kitchen in Gaza on Monday. The work they were doing was saving lives, providing food to thousands of starving people,” said the director general at a press briefing. Responding to a blast of international criticism, Israel’s top military and political leadership expressed deep regret for the incident in which air force drones deliberately picked off, one by one, three cars carrying the seven aid workers affiliated with an organisation widely recognised even by Israelis as a neutral partner. The country pledged a high-level investigation of the incident. But Tedros said that the incident reflects systemic problems faced by virtually every agency mission WHO has conducted in Gaza in coordinating missions with Israel’s military through areas of Gaza that it now controls. Those problems are also putting its aid workers at risk almost daily from combat fire, as well as taking the lives of other innocent people in the past six months of war, Tedros and other senior WHO officials said. “The DG rightly highlights why we are all appalled by the killings of our colleagues, in clearly marked vehicles in a deconflicted area. It clearly shows that the deconfliction mechanism is not working,” said Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). “What is needed is an effective, transparent and workable deconfliction and notification mechanism. The UN has to be assured that convoys and facilities are not targeted. It means that assuring movement of aid in Gaza, including through checkpoints, is predictable, expedited, etc. That roads are operational and cleared.” Fraught with cancellations, delays and uncertainties Dr Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based office for the Occupied Palestinian Territories. In particular, WHO relief missions to northern Gaza, which Israel nominally controls although heavy pockets of fighting with Hamas continue – have been fraught with cancellations, delays and other uncertainties for months, Peeperkorn complained. “We see too many missions delayed or denied. It’s also making the missions which are delayed, and I’ve been on quite a few myself, more arduous and dangerous. You sometimes return at 11 o’clock at night, or past midnight. So it becomes unnecessarily dangerous.” “Even today, who my team was in an mission to the north, again, to deliver a few medical supplies, food and water, to Al-Ahli Hospital and Al-Sahabah Hospital in the north… They were, as was planned and agreed on, between 6 and 7 a.m. ready to go,” he recounted. “They went to the checkpoint, and just before the checkpoint, they’ve been waiting and waiting and waiting up till now. Now they had to return back to their to their guest houses.” Not an isolated incident Shell of WCK car that came under drone attack, with the NGOs identity clearly marked on its roof Along with the blast of international criticism, the WCK attack has been deplored widely inside Israel, where the organisation has been praised for having also delivered food aid to Israelis displaced by the Hamas attacks on Jewish communities around the perimeter of Gaza on 7 October. While the Israeli army has sought to portray the killings as a tragic, but isolated incident, critics say it reflects more systemic problems related not only to poor coordination of aid, but an expanding culture of “shoot first ask questions later.” Peeperkorn underlined that the attack also wasn’t an isolated incident for UN and WHO operations. “We shouldn’t forget that already in December, January, we have seen, unfortunately, attacks and sometimes the shooting at the UN vehicles,” he said. This included a mission to the north in which he participated in early December, he recalled. “There was an airstrike 150 meters from our car. The truck delivering medical supplies was shot at, the PRCS (Palestinian Red Crescent Society) people were shot at. And PRCS staff were actually arrested and detained for a while.” Painstaking detail for every mission prepared Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, in southern Gaza. Each WHO convoy to southern Gaza, and northward, requires painstaking preparation. Detailed planning is required for every mission WHO or its partners prepare. For WHO missions, not only international and local health workers, but also a security officer and an ordnance expert are typically included in the team as well. “It’s an enormous amount of work, and every mission that gets delayed, impeded or denied, that other missions cannot take place,” Peeperkorn said. “All of those details – the timing, the people on the missions, are shared through Israeli counterparts, and then there is agreement that the mission can take place at this hour,” he stressed. “You want to start this as early as possible. For some of the food transport, it’s even better to do that at night, before sunrise. But in the case of medical supplies, food or fuel for patients, we normally start a mission around 5 or 6 in the morning. …. Because there will always be delays, and you want to be back in daylight. A team sets out on the road only after it has received an OK from the Israeli army. “Then, normally, there’s a holding point at military checkpoints, where you have to wait again,” Peeperkorn said. “Most of the missions, there were always problems. Delays, delays, delays – and often denials in the end,” he said. “And the mission today was a good example – to bring a few medical supplies, food and water to those two hospitals in the north. “It was all agreed, they would leave at 6:30 to 7 am. First of all they don’t get a green light to go. And finally, they get a green light to go to the checkpoint…. “And then they waited before the checkpoint. And they wait and they wait and they wait. In the meantime, very little discussion. Nothing is going on. “They realize that even if they get a green light now, they can’t go to Al Sahaba anymore. They would only deliver supplies to Al Ahli hospital and then go back.” Eventually, after more waiting, they realise that “they will never be able to return [in time], and they have to cancel the mission.” Workable deconfliction “So what is a workable deconfliction mechanism?” Peeperkorn asked. “That routes are coordinated. That it’s a predictable mechanism. That the roads are going to be clear. And anyone who knows Gaza, know that there are a number of roads, which can be easily cleared and made operational. “So in a way, it’s a simple mechanism, and somehow, it has never properly worked.” Given the mass hunger that northern Gaza faces, followed by the near total destruction of Al Shifa Hospital, the area’s main health facility, over the past two weeks, those missions are needed now more than ever, Peeperkorn stressed. “There should be 50 missions going to the north every day. Multiple [missions] of food, water, shelter, and maybe one medical mission. That should be happening everywhere, including in the south,” said Peeperkorn. “And even if there’s active conflict going on, then you expect that humanitarian corridors are created, where the UN partners can safely deliver their aid and do their job. And clearly the horrific attack on WCK is clearly a sign that this is not working. “So I really do expect, whatever comes out now, that we get a functional deconfliction mechanism and a proper notification system and that the UN and partners can do their work.” Image Credits: AFP/TImes of Israel, WHO/EMRO. Health As a Driver of Innovation Not Just a Recipient 03/04/2024 Hans Henri P. Kluge An electronic blood sugar monitor makes it easier for people with diabetes to manage their disease. As WHO unveils S.A.R.A.H. (Smart AI Resource Assistant for Health), its new digital health promoter prototype powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI), and available in eight languages 24 hours a day, WHO’s Regional Director for Europe writes about harnessing innovation in health to help meet critical public health challenges, both now and in the future. Innovation has always been a driving force behind advancements in health, revolutionizing the way we prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases. And as we navigate through a rapidly evolving health landscape, embracing health innovation has become more crucial than ever. From cutting-edge technologies like mRNA vaccines to AI-driven diagnostics, the potential of innovation to transform healthcare is limitless. But for too long health has often been viewed as a passive beneficiary of innovation rather than a driver of it. It’s time to change this mentality and harness the power of innovation. The challenges we face, from global pandemics to rising chronic diseases, from a rapidly ageing population to the effects of climate change, demand creative solutions that prioritize the well-being of populations worldwide. Shifting mindsets to move health innovation needle Our sector – health – can and should be at the cutting edge of new and innovative solutions, driven by technology including AI, which is going to fundamentally change every aspect of human life over the coming century. In fact, the IMF predicts that 40% of jobs will be affected by AI in some shape or form over the coming years, including in health and care. Further, AI products and services are expected to contribute $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, more than the current output of China and India combined. However, while technological advancements have made significant strides in healthcare, social innovations and policies also play a crucial role in addressing the complex needs of diverse communities. Innovation in public health goes beyond technological breakthroughs; it involves harnessing creativity, collaboration, and sustainability, to promote equitable access to quality healthcare. To foster an environment conducive to innovation in public health, leaders and decision-makers must focus on responding to the needs of communities while closing the equity gap. We must shift the focus from solely economic returns to the broader public health impact of innovative solutions. By aligning policies with the goal of improving health outcomes for all, we can better address inequalities in healthcare access and deliver sustainable solutions that benefit society as a whole. Another strategic shift requires patients themselves to be co-creators and designers of innovation because patients are experts in their own right. They know how to navigate life living with cancer or diabetes or a physical/mental disability. Involving them in the full pathway of disease management will make solutions more relevant and sustainable, and encourage innovation at scale. Ecosystem approach As public health professionals, we are not always good at articulating how innovation meets health and societal needs. That’s why we need an ecosystem approach to innovation. By fostering collaborations between healthcare providers, technology companies, research institutions, and policymakers, a holistic ecosystem can be created to drive innovation in health. In Ireland, for example, the Health Ministry joined forces with the Department for Business, Enterprise, and Innovation to set up the Health Innovation Hub, an incubator for public health solutions. Health workers in the Health Innovation Hub spend half their time delivering care and the other half working with start-ups and health tech companies: a clear example of an ecosystem approach. Digital solutions to health, such as telemedicine, are already a reality in some countries. As we embrace innovation to tackle pressing global challenges, sustainability must remain at the core of our efforts. Innovations should not only address current needs but also contribute to long-term social, economic, and environmental sustainability. This requires a shift towards sustainable practices, circular economy models, and responsible innovation that minimizes negative impacts on both people and planet. Too often people tell me that striving for health equity is at odds with our market-driven societies; that equity somehow stifles innovation. I would strongly dispute that – there is no contradiction. But unfortunately, modern economics tends to focus only on improving efficiency – for example, getting more cancer screenings for the dollar, or squeezing the last ounce of productivity out of the health system. Equity – leaving no one behind – is not seen as the responsibility of the commercial sector but that of the state or the non-profit sector. This mindset also needs to change. A Wellbeing Economy values equity and not only revenue or “productivity”. It strives to make the world a safe and just place for humanity – and this is the true challenge for innovators. The future is already here Innovation for health brings together experts from diverse fields such as medicine, engineering, data science, and behavioural psychology. But as health is about where people live, love, work, and play, it’s also about transportation, urban planning, and agriculture. This interdisciplinary approach not only catalyses breakthrough discoveries but also nurtures a culture of cross-pollination, where ideas flourish, and boundaries are transcended – precisely the kind of culture that innovation needs to thrive. However, the pursuit of innovation for health is not without its hurdles. From regulatory barriers to financial constraints, from ethical dilemmas to data privacy concerns, the path to innovation is fraught with challenges that require careful navigation. Nevertheless, these challenges should not deter us but rather galvanize our resolve to push the boundaries of what is possible. By fostering a culture of innovation, nurturing creative minds, and empowering diverse stakeholders to collaborate, we can address the most pressing challenges of our time. Embracing emerging technologies, exploring new frontiers in science and medicine, and prioritizing social innovations will pave the way for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future and help countries in the hard-pressed challenge of reaching the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. We are well and truly in an era of ever accelerating innovation in health, bringing with it boundless possibilities for improving our collective health and wellbeing, generating jobs, and growing our economies. But health leaders are not yet fully equipped to navigate this new world, so full of exciting potential, with confidence. The health sector must be ready and equipped to embrace innovation across all dimensions, strengthening health and wellbeing. Or run the risk of being left behind, squandering the opportunities of today and jeopardizing the very future of health itself. The choice is clear. Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge is WHO Regional Director for Europe Innovation ecosystem for public health Digital health – WHO/Europe AI ethics and governance guidance Image Credits: Uka Borrgeaard/ WHO, Juliana Tan/ WHO, WHO. Uganda’s Constitutional Court Greenlights Draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 03/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Uganda’s Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera (centre) delivers the Constitutional Court ruling. Uganda’s Constitutional Court ruled on Wednesday that the country’s draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 complies with the country’s Constitution in all but four aspects. “We decline to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety neither would we grant a permanent injunction against its enforcement,” Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera, told the Kampala courtroom and a capacity Zoom audience of 500. The four sections that were struck down by the five-judge panel – 3 (2c), 9, 11 (2d) and 14 – were “inconsistent with right to health, privacy and freedom of religion”, according to the court. UPDATE: The Constitutional Court has declined to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety.#NTVNews#AntiHomosexualAct pic.twitter.com/nQGIoe3sUA — NTV UGANDA (@ntvuganda) April 3, 2024 “The nullified sections had criminalised the letting of premises for use for homosexual purposes, the failure by anyone to report acts of homosexuality to the police for appropriate action, and the engagement in acts of homosexuality by anyone which results into the other persons contracting a terminal illness,” according to a statement from the court. Buteera said that the mandatory reporting to authorities of people suspected of having committed homosexual offences violated individual rights. While the court has struck down the possibility of landlords being imprisoned for renting premises to homosexuals, it has maintained that prison terms of up to 20 years for journalists “promoting homosexuality” were legitimate. In delivering the unanimous judgement, Buteera said that constraints on the media aligned with sections of the country’s Communications Act and Anti-Pornography Act, which “aim to uphold societal morals by limiting the use of media to publish or broadcast offensive material”. The Act’s legitimacy was contested by 22 Ugandan human rights advocates including Member of Parliament Fox Oywelowo Odoi (the only MP to vote against the Act), legal academics Prof. Sylvia Tamale and Rutaro Robert and Bishop James Lubega Banda. They said that it violated various constitutional rights, including the right to privacy and freedom from discrimination, as well as going against Uganda’s international human rights commitments. Frank Mugisha, of Sexual Minorities Uganda and Convening for Equality co-convener, described the ruling as “wrong and deplorable”, and called on “all governments, UN partners, and multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the Global Fund to likewise intensify their demand that this law be struck down”. “This ruling should result in further restrictions to funding for Uganda – no donor should be funding anti-LGBTQ+ hate and human rights violations,” said Mugisha, one of Uganda’s most prominent LGBTQ activists. Nicholas Opiyo of human rights group Chapter Four Uganda, said his organisation “vehemently disagrees” with the court’s finding and the basis on which it was reached. “We approached the court expecting it to apply the law in defence of human rights and not rely on public sentiments, and vague cultural values arguments,” said Opiyo. Life sentence and death penalty Protests have been held worldwide in support of the Ugandan LGBTI community as it faces attack. The Anti-Homosexuality Act introduces “the offence of homosexuality”, with a potential life sentence for a same-sex “sexual act”. It also allows the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”, including sex acts with children, disabled people or those drugged against their will, or committed by people living with HIV – actions that are already criminalised by other laws. Since the Act was passed last May, the World Bank has suspended new loans to Uganda and the US President’s Emergency Plan to Fight AIDS (Pepfar) has declined to advance plans for the country. There has also been widespread condemnation of the law. Buteera claimed that the Act had been passed “against the backdrop of the recruitment of children into the practice of homosexuality. That is the mischief that Section 11 [dealing with the “promotion of homosexuality”] of the Act seeks to address.” ‘Absence of global consensus’ on LGBTQ rights The court presented seven points as the basis for its decision, including that “sister jurisdictions” have “decriminalised consensual homosexuality between adults in private space”. However, it referred to the absence of global consensus “regarding non-discrimination based sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC)”. “This is reflected in the fact that to date non-discrimination on the basis of the SOGIESC variables has not explicitly found its way into international human rights treaties. Instead, it has been ‘vetoed’ by a bloc of resistant (UN) member states that has prevented the adoption of a binding declaration or similar instrument to strengthen protections for LGBTI human rights,” according to the court. The court also referred to conflicts between “a universal understanding of human rights and respecting the diversity and freedom of human cultures” and between “individuals’ right to self-determination, self-perception and bodily autonomy, on the one hand; and the communal or societal right to social, political and cultural self-determination” on the other. Finally, it described the Anti-Homosexuality Act as “a reflection of the socio-cultural realities of the Ugandan society, and was passed by an overwhelming majority of the democratically elected representatives of the Ugandan citizens”. Win for government Dr Adrian Jjuukho, Ugandan human rights lawyer and executive director of Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF), which was one of the petitioners against the Act, described the ruling as “only intended to please donors in the health sector so that they can continue to provide the funds that are much needed while sacrificing LGBTI persons in the process”. “The Court has nullified provisions that directly impede health service provision including reporting obligations, and where the victim acquires a terminal illness. This clears the way for health funding but does not actually clear the way for proper service provision,” said Jjuukho, writing on X (Twitter). 1. The Constitutional Court just delivered what would be a win-win judgment – intended to please all parties. Unfortunately, this only pleases one party – the government, which will most likely get its World Bank and Global Fund money as the LGBT community continues to be muzzled — Dr. Adrian Jjuuko (@jjuukoa) April 3, 2024 In a guarded statement, UNAIDS Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa Anne Githuku-Shongwe, said that “evidence shows that criminalizing populations most at risk of HIV, such as the LGBTQ+ communities, obstructs access to life-saving health and HIV services, which undermines public health and the overall HIV response in the country.” “To achieve the goal of ending the AIDS pandemic by 2030, it is vital to ensure that everyone has equal access to health services without fear,” she added. UNAIDS provided evidence in support of the petitioners on certain clauses via an amicus brief. Meanwhile, Ugandan feminist lawyer Sunshine Fionah Komusana told Health Policy Watch that “the ruling impacts everyone”. “With the kind of government we have, I don’t know how anyone would be celebrating, knowing very well the different tags they use to deny people freedom of expression and association.,” said Komusana. “Anti-human rights groups are gaining ground and before we know it, these kinds of legislation will be feeding into retraction of several other rights. See examples of reintroduction of legislation to legalise female genital mutilation and child marriages in some countries. These legislations harm all of us.” Uganda’s laws were robust enough to address paedophilia, and they already criminalised LGBTQIA+ people; this new law will affect you, political opponent candidates and your children. It is far-reaching and ambiguous. Anyone can be guilty. #ResistAHA23 pic.twitter.com/trWllorXf6 — Uganda Feminist Forum (UFF) (@UgFeministForum) June 29, 2023 Hundreds of people have already been arrested and attacked since the Act was introduced last May. In one case, a man was attacked in his home by a group of men one night. He was beaten and some of his property burnt by the mob, which accused him of being a homosexual. In a similar incident, a lesbian was attacked by two men in her home. She had been evicted by her landlord on the grounds of homosexuality but did not have the resources to move. International reaction to the court’s ruling will no doubt be keenly watched by countries contemplating their own anti-LGBTQ laws, such as Ghana, Kenya, South Sudan and Tanzania. In February, Ghana’s Parliament unanimously passed one of the world’s most draconian anti-LGBTIQ Bills which includes a mandatory three-year prison sentence for a person who simply “identifies” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or queer”. However, the president has yet to sign it into law. Image Credits: Alisdare Hickson/Flickr. Continued Mpox Outbreak Leads US to Re-examine Smallpox Readiness 03/04/2024 Sophia Samantaroy Although smallpox has been eradicated, it is possib;le to recreate it from published genomes. In the wake of surging mpox cases in the DRC and the emergence of novel orthopoxviruses, the US needs to rapidly bolster its smallpox readiness, preparedness, and response, according to a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report brought together experts from across the country to critically evaluate the state of smallpox vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics, known as medical countermeasures (MCMs), in the event of an outbreak. Improving MCMs is crucial for enhancing the nation’s ability to combat a smallpox outbreak or deliberate attack, the report emphasizes. It also stresses the importance of fortifying public health and healthcare systems to swiftly and effectively respond, including mechanisms for rapid vaccine distribution. An ‘evolving bio-threat and technology landscape’ With advancements in genome sequencing and editing technology, it is now possible to recreate live smallpox virus from published genomes, the report warns. US population changes and advancements in gene editing and synthesis technologies have drastically altered the potential for a smallpox outbreak or attack in recent years. But these technologies significantly raise the risk of accidental or intentional release, challenging readiness planning and potentially altering the epidemiology and clinical presentations of the disease. The report notes that even if all existing collections of the virus were destroyed, reemergence is still a threat. Despite the risks, the report underscores the necessity of continued research involving live variola virus for developing and enhancing smallpox MCMs. This research is essential for creating more effective therapies, validating vaccine and treatment efficacy, and establishing animal models for research purposes. Research using these viruses can also fill gaps in our fundamental understanding of orthopoxvirus biology, ecology, evolution, transmission, and disease onset in humans. A call for MCM research and development Three main categories of MCMs need improvement: diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics. More accurate diagnostic tests to detect smallpox and related viruses at earlier stages is paramount. Vaccine safety is also an issue, and the report calls for research into vaccines that can be used across different populations and that are available as a single dose. “Developing new smallpox vaccines that use a multi-vaccine platform – which use common vaccine vectors, manufacturing ingredients, and processes – would improve the capacity for rapid production and reduce the need for stockpiling.” Lastly, the report advocates for safer and more diversified therapeutics, such as antivirals with different and diverse targets, mechanisms, and routes of administration, to supplement existing antivirals. Vulnerabilities: too few manufacturers The smallpox vaccine protects against mpox. The report concluded that the small number of manufacturers capable of producing smallpox medical countermeasures is a specific vulnerability, and that there is currently insufficient capacity to scale production in the event of a large outbreak or attack. Logistics and supply chain management planning is critical, as is planning for regulatory responsiveness. Clinical and public health guidance also needs to be updated to reflect new data and medical countermeasures so that health care providers and others on the front line of public health have the capability and capacity to respond to smallpox. The need for global cooperation Both the COVID-19 pandemic and mpox outbreaks revealed gaps in the US’s ability to respond to new infectious diseases. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the ability of US public health and health care systems to adapt and respond to an unfamiliar pathogen. Mpox, on the other hand, showed the challenges of rapidly making diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics available at scale. Furthermore, the mpox outbreak brought to light the lack of diverse smallpox therapeutics options. Currently, standard research methods rely on challenge studies in animals to understand MCM efficacy in humans, leading to issues with accurately understanding the safety and efficacy in humans. “The gaps in our ability to respond to a new infectious disease were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent mpox outbreak,” said committee chair Prof Larry Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law and professor of medicine at Georgetown University. “It is vital to prioritize research into the development of safer and more effective smallpox diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, make judicious choices in stockpiling, and have modern, well-practiced, and adaptable plans for responding in the event of a smallpox outbreak,” added Gostin, who is also director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Research and development for these MCMs needs to not only consider the actual device or product, but also the ability to “deploy at scale” and equitably to meet the challenges of public acceptance. The report urges effective risk communication for vaccines, as the same challenges with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation could occur in a smallpox outbreak. While the report primarily focused on US readiness and response capabilities, it does note the impact of growing global interdependence in detecting and containing potential smallpox outbreaks. “The COVID-19 pandemic and pox multi-country outbreak, both declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) by WHO, underscore the need for further domestic global coordination for preparedness and response against novel pathogens including orthopoxvirus events,” note the report authors. This means preemptively supporting international MCM capacity as any US response will be “significantly affected” by the ability of other countries to detect and surveil. The report notes that global solidarity is a key component to rapidly identify, contain, respond, and ensure equitable MCM allocation in a smallpox event. Preparedness for similar viruses Smallpox-related viruses such as mpox, Alaskapox, and cowpox are increasingly found in humans, magnifying the need for medical countermeasures that can detect, treat, and prevent these diseases. The report notes that most mpox therapeutics were developed because of investments in smallpox therapeutics. “Direct investment in developing therapeutics targeting circulating orthopoxviruses could similarly benefit smallpox therapeutic preparedness and would likely have more immediate utility and potentially achieve commercial viability.” Image Credits: Isao Arita/ WHO. Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Access Battle for New Generation Obesity Drugs 04/04/2024 Zuzanna Stawiska The new generation of obesity drugs have reached sky-high popularity – and command high prices. Demand for diabetes drugs such as Wegovy, Ozempic, Rybelsis and Trulicity has soared since they have been clinically proven to help weight loss – but they are massively overpriced in the US and unavailable in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), according to Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). The mark-up for these drugs – called glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists (GLP-1) – in the US is almost 40,000%, according to a paper published in JAMA last week authored by Yale University’s Dr Melissa Barber and MSF’s Dr Dzintars Gotham, Dr Helen Bygrave and Christa Cepuch. The authors modelled the manufacturing costs of a variety of diabetes medications and added a modest profit margin. “MSF’s study estimates that GLP-1s for diabetes could be sold at a profit for just $0.89 per month, compared to the price of $95 per month charged in Brazil, $115 per month charged in South Africa, $230 charged in Latvia and at least $353 charged in the US [based on Medicare price], which is a 39,562% markup over what the estimated generic price could be,” according to MSF’s press release. In fact, the US drug costs are usually much higher, reaching as much as about $1000 monthly. Novo Nordisk makes both Ozempic and Wegovy (which contains a higher dose of the active ingredient, semaglutide, than Ozempic), while Eli Lilly makes Trulicity. Some are oral pills and others are injections. US Senator Bernie Sanders has called on Novo Nordisk to lower the price of Ozempic Wegovy in the US to no more than what they charge for this drug in Canada. “The American people are sick and tired of paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs while the pharmaceutical industry enjoys huge profits,” said Sanders in a statement. “As a result of a major grassroots movement, Novo Nordisk did the right thing by recently reducing the price of its insulin products by some 75% in America. Novo Nordisk, a company that made nearly $15 billion in profits last year, must now do the right thing with respect to Ozempic and Wegovy,” added Sanders, who chairs the US Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. FDA approval for weight management While GLP-1 drugs were made to treat diabetes, in 2021 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Wegovy for weight management in people with a body-mass index (BMI) of over 30, or a BMI of over 27 with underlying conditions such as high blood pressure. “Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly are the only producers of these GLP-1s today, and their intellectual property barriers on the drugs and injection devices block any generic manufacturing that could help drive prices down,” MSF notes. “The corporations have not even announced a price for low- and middle-income countries, nor have they licensed these drugs so that generic manufacturers could make them, which would help to meet global demand and drive prices down,” MSF says, noting that because they are now being used for weight loss in high-income countries, the companies are “unable to meet the massive demand”. Co-author Christa Cepuch, pharmacist coordinator at MSF’s Access Campaign, describes the new drugs as “an absolute game changer for people living with diabetes”, but cannot be accessed by people in LMICs. “Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk can in no way supply the world with the amount of these medicines needed to meet global demand, so they must immediately relinquish their stranglehold and allow them to be produced by more manufacturers around the world,” said Cepuch. The steep price of the drugs is hampering access even in the US, although the country’s federal health insurance programme, Medicare, recently struck a deal with Novo Nordisk, to cover the cost of Wegovy – but strictly for preventing heart attacks and strokes not for weight loss, Reuters reported. “The American people are sick and tired of paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs while the pharmaceutical industry enjoys huge profits,” said sen. Bernie Sanders, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on the US cost of GLP-1s. “Ozempic has the potential to be a game changer in the diabetes and obesity epidemics in America. But, if we do not substantially reduce the price of this drug, millions who need it will be unable to afford it,” he continued. Obesity’s heavy burden The GLP-1 drugs stimulate insulin production and feeling of satiety (fullness), promote weight loss, lower blood pressure and cholesterol, improve blood flow in the heart and uptake of glucose in the muscles, according to the US National Institute of Health. Side effects can include commonly nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, stomach pain, headache or stomach flu, and less often, depression with suicidal thoughts or kidney failure. Doctors warn that they need to be taken alongside a healthy diet and exercise. The US accounts for almost three-quarters of the sale of Novo-Nordisk’s Ozempic, Wegovy and Rybelsus, according to Pew Research Center. The country has an adult obesity rate of 42%, according to the American CDC, one of the highest in the world. Despite steep prices and side-effects, GLP-1s have become wildly popular in the last few years, especially in the US. Obesity is a growing problem worldwide, affecting 890 million adults – 16% of the global population – in 2022, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). The prevalence of this condition more than doubled between 1990 and 2022. Global costs of obesity and overweight are predicted to reach $3 trillion per year by 2030 and more than $18 trillion by 2060 at the current rate. In relation to obesity, World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus recently stressed that the private sector “must be held accountable for the health impacts of their products” as Health Policy Watch reported – a reference to the impact of products such as ultra-processed food and sugary drinks on obesity. Being overweight and obese increases people’s risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and cancer, WHO highlights, also affecting bone health and reproduction and increase the risk of certain cancers. Both conditions can be affected by gene composition, but are mostly a result of an imbalance of energy intake (diet) and energy expenditure (physical activity). As such, are largely dependent on the options the environment offers. “Obesity is a societal rather than an individual responsibility, with the solutions to be found through the creation of supportive environments and communities,” WHO says. The analytics platform, Airfinity, argues that it would be beneficial for public health to administer Wegovy to not only to diabetics type 2 patients, as the current Medicare deal allows, but to all people in the US with a BMI over 40. If 60% of people living with obesity and 40% of those of a BMI above 35 received the drugs, this could prevent as many as 300 000 heart failures in the US by 2030, according to Airfinity World distribution of obesity. Safe the extreme numbers for small populations (on the right), some Middle Eastern countries and the US show highest percentages. The demand for the Novo Nordisk drugs has more than quadrupled between 2019 and 2021, reaching 8.2 million prescriptions. In fact, the demand was so high that it caused many months of shortages in the US, making it difficult for many to obtain their doses, Reuters reports. Even those who do not have any medical reason to take GLP-1s often ask their doctors for a prescription. The drugs, seen as a miraculous way to achieveachieve wards a perfect body shape, feed hope that impossible beauty standards can be attained with a weekly injection. Despite the surge in demand for these drugs, it’s important to recognize that they alone cannot address the societal challenges associated with obesity. According to the WHO website, “Stopping the rise in obesity demands multisectoral actions such as food manufacturing, marketing and pricing and others that seek to address the wider determinants of health (such as poverty reduction and urban planning).” “While we are unaware of the analysis used in the [MSF] study, we have always recognized the need for continuous evaluation of innovation and affordability levers to support greater access of our products,” said Novo Nordisk in a statement. “We continue to support greater health equity to those in need of diabetes treatment and care.” Image Credits: Chemist4u, Pew Research Center. Tanzania Merges HIV and Diabetes Care to Tackle NCD Crisis 04/04/2024 Kizito Makoye A diabetic patient with kidney complications receiving dialysis treatment at the Muhimbili National Hospital in Non-communicable diseases like hypertension and diabetes have emerged as serious health crises in developing countries, as HIV was a decade ago. New models of primary health care that combine NCD and HIV care are catching on – and Tanzania is implementing this approach. DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania – Lying on a neatly made bed at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Zaituni Kashozi is recovering from surgery to amputate her gnarled toes that were infected by diabetic ulcers. Wrapped in iodine-stained bandage, her left foot dangles on a string attached to an aluminium bar that helps to propel her feeble blood circulation. The 74-year-old, who has grappled with diabetes for three decades, woke up to a grim reality a year ago when insidious infections took root, forcing her to go under the surgeon’s scalpel. “I don’t feel any pain on my feet. All the sense of touch is gone. Even if you prick me with a needle, I won’t feel it. What a terrible disease,” Kashozi laments. Within the walls of this 1,500-bed medical facility, the toll of diabetes is strikingly evident. Ward after ward echoes with the woes of chronic foot ulcers even blindness – a reflection of the toll diabetes is taking on the urban populace. Diabetes, a chronic metabolic disease, poses a serious health threat that can affect the heart, blood vessels, eyes, kidneys and nerves. An estimated 12.8% of the population had diabetes by 2021 – up from around 2.8% in a decade. However, cardiovascular disease such as strokes and heart attacks – often driven by hypertension – is the biggest NCD killer in the country. Many people are unaware that they have either hypertension or diabetes until very late. The elderly, like Kashozi, bear a huge burden of NCDs, and around 90% of those aged 50 and above navigate the labyrinth of health challenges without the safety net of health insurance, forcing them to dart between hospitals frantically seeking elusive medical care. HIV and NCD management under one roof On the other side of the city, Halfani Ali, a 53-year-old father of five, is struggling with the dual challenges of HIV/AIDS and diabetes. Since his HIV diagnosis in 2003, Ali has been receiving care and medication at various health centres across the city. However, in 2013, Ali’s life took an unexpected turn when he was diagnosed with diabetes. This dual burden of disease has presented a complex challenge, forcing him to juggle HIV and diabetes appointments at two different health centres. Recognizing the struggles faced by individuals like Ali, the Temeke Regional Referral Hospital in Dar es Salaam (TRRH) integrated health care for NCDs within the ambit of HIV services in 2023. Now individuals like Ali can manage coexisting conditions like diabetes and hypertension under the same roof. “I am very happy because I get all my medication at Temeke Hospital. I don’t have to travel all the way to Kariakoo to see a diabetes specialist,” says Ali, reflecting the relief he has experienced with the integrated approach. A health worker takes blood sample from Sultani Ally Kessy to test for diabetes during a diabetes camp at Temeke Regional Referral Hospital. Maria Bitwale, a senior oncologist at Temeke Hospital, says many HIV patients with diabetes are now seeking treatment, and the integrated approach is helping to deter potential health crisis triggered by diabetic complications. On a bright Saturday morning, Ali approaches the physician’s desk where his examination unfolds meticulously. Bitwale, armed with a patellar hammer, probes the nuances of his nerves, safeguarding against the perils of diabetic complications. Ali’s eyes light up as he recounts the doctor’s advice on nerve function control and a prescribed diet, ensuring he remains in robust health. In this amalgamation of medical expertise and personal resilience, Ali’s story is testimony to the success of integrated healthcare approach for killer diabetes, HIV and hypertension – diseases which previously could have led to a death sentence, alone or together. HIV is an entry point for NCD care In Tanzania, over 1.4 million people out of the country’s 61 million population are living with HIV. Of these, an estimated 29% have hypertension and 13% have diabetes. And it is these latter diseases that are now the main causes of death in Tanzanians living with HIV today. Integrating up NCDs care into HIV services, which are widely available at the primary health care level, is the one new model being used to diagnose, prevent and manage leading chronic diseases in a cost-effective manner. John Njingu, Tanzania’s Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Health, emphasises that integration of NCDs into primary healthcare facilities nationwide, extending to HIV-targeted clinics, where the screening and management of NCDs are offered to people with or without HIV under one roof. “We want to bring better health care services to the people at lower cost to the service providers and the patients themselves,” he told Health Policy Watch in an interview. The NCD response in Tanzania took a major leap forward in 2019 on World Diabetes Day, when a new National NCD Prevention and Control Programme was launched by Tanzania’s Prime Minister, Kassim Majaliwa. The NCD strategy has been rolled out in 700 primary health care clinics in 26 regions across Tanzania, 245 of them in the first stage. These PHC centres have been provided with basic NCD diagnostic equipment, and over 3,000 health care staff working at the centres have been trained in basic NCD care. The new programme builds on several years of effort by the Ministry of Health and national stakeholders to establish the necessary platform for NCD services to reach communities. The new strategy has been supported by a range of national as well as international partners, including World Health Organization (WHO), the Global Fund, the US President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and UNAIDS. The WHO guidelines call for HIV-NCD service integration across the continuum of care as does the 2021 Political Declaration of the UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting on HIV and AIDS. But there is still a long way to go, as the country has a total of 8,549 primary, secondary and tertiary heath facilities, according to the Ministry of Health. ‘Unprecedented’ in sub-Saharan Africa “What we have seen unfolding in Tanzania with basic NCD services for very common conditions such as diabetes and hypertension now reaching primary care across the country at this scale is arguably unprecedented in a sub-Saharan African context,” says Bent Lautrup-Nielsen, head of global advocacy at the World Diabetes Foundation (WDF). WDF began supporting NCD interventions in the country two decades ago, and has played a key supporting role in the new NCD programme launch. “With the strong results on NCDs achieved by the Ministry of Health, the President’s Office for Regional Administration of Local Government and key national partners such as Tanzania Diabetes Association and Tanzania NCD Alliance, the prospect of integrated primary care with NCDs becoming part of routine services everywhere alongside HIV, TB and maternal and newborn care are now quite promising,” said Lautrup-Nielsen. The INTE-Africa research team and stakeholders in Tanzania New research findings demonstrating the benefits of integration also have helped pave the way for broader change. In a ground-breaking study dubbed INTE-Africa, conducted in Tanzania and Uganda in 2022, scientists documented the benefits of merging and decentralising services for HIV, diabetes, and hypertension in terms of disease management and cost-savings. The study, published in The Lancet in 2023, found that integrated management resulted in a 75% higher rate of retention in care for people with HIV and one or more NCD conditions; did not adversely affect viral suppression rates among people with HIV; and was cost-saving in terms of the health services provided. The researchers randomly allocated 32 health facilities (17 in Uganda and 15 in Tanzania) serving 7,028 eligible patients, to integrated care or standard care groups. In the integrated care group, participants with HIV, diabetes or hypertension, were managed by the same health workers, used the same pharmacy, and had uniform medical records, registration and laboratory services. In the standard care group, patients attended separate standalone clinics for each condition, following the standard practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Data collection was conducted at baseline, as well as months six and 12. Retention was assessed through routine clinic attendance and track-and-trace procedures. Roadmap for policymakers The study’s findings lay out a roadmap for policymakers, not just in Tanzania and Uganda, but more widely across Africa for scaling up integrated care for conditions such as HIV, diabetes, and hypertension, saving money while providing effective care. The idea of anchoring such care in HIV clinics is based on the success in providing HIV patients with steady care, resulting in dramatic suppression of viral load. The death toll for this group has plunged from a peak of two million annual deaths in the early 2000s to fewer than 500,000 deaths in 2022, researchers say. Inspired by the INTE-Africa trial, Tanzania, which had for many years embraced infectious diseases as its priority in health policy and resources allocations, is undergoing a seismic shift in its primary health care services to address the new NCD crisis. The integration of HIV, diabetes and hypertension services has earned global recognition, as reflected in the NCD Alliance’s Spending Wisely report, which also found “evidence is strong that integrated services can deliver health impact.” The shift in Tanzania’s policy also aligns with the evolving strategy of the Global Fund dubbed Prioritization Framework Supporting Health Longevity Among People Living with HIV, which articulates the opportunities and priorities for integrated investments to prevents, identify and managed advanced HIV disease and NCDs, among other diseases, for the period of 2023-2025. The strategy calls for integrating NCD services into other services designed for people living with HIV, especially those over the age of 50. Countries are encouraged to align services with the WHO package of essential NCD disease interventions for primary health care focusing on cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes and early diagnosis of cancer. Global Fund specialist Dan Koros told Health Policy Watch that the Fund’s support for NCD Integration into HIV programs in Tanzania began in January 2024 with a grant of $115,075 – primarily for carrying out baseline assessment, developing protocols and training healthcare workers for the period of 2024-2026. The Global Fund investments aim to support integrated diagnosis and treatment of HIV positive adults over the age of 40 and on antiretroviral treatment, who are also receiving treatment for one or more NCD, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and mental health conditions. Anna Mlengu, who suffers from diabetes, consults a doctor at Hindul Mandal Hospital in Dar es Salaam. NCD’s – highest premature mortality is in LMICs Globally the NCDs are the leading cause of death, killing 41 million people each year-equivalent to 71% of all deaths worldwide. And the highest rates of premature mortality – that is deaths before the age of 70, are in low- and middle-income countries, particularly Africa. Across the WHO’s African region, patients suffering from diabetes and hypertension are neglected, with less than half remaining in care one year after diagnosis, leading to approximately two million deaths each year, medical researchers say. And when their disease condition is addressed later in life, it also makes treatment much more complex. Many elderly patients like Kashozi, suffering from diabetic ulcers and related complications, do not always get access to specialised care. “The ageing process affects immune function and slower wound healing, making the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers even harder,” says Zawadi Chiwanga, senior endocrinologist and lead surgeon in Kashozi’s case. “Diabetic ulcers can be particularly insidious, often manifesting silently without the knowledge of a patient until they reach an advanced stage,” Chiwanga told Health Policy Watch. Diabetes affects younger people too While traditionally Tanzanians perceived diabetes as a disease that primarily haunts the elderly, the city of Dar es Salaam, one of Africa’s fastest growing urban areas, bears witness to a different reality. From Tandale, a labyrinthine slum, to the upscale enclave of Masaki, favoured by Western diplomats, and further to Kariakoo, a business hub replete with fast- food joints, youth obesity is on the rise – accompanied by an alarming surge in diabetes cases. Out of the 613,210 patients screened for diabetes at MHN in the last six months, an estimated 165,566 individuals (27%), were diagnosed with diabetes, hospital records show. Along with the toll of co-infections, this silent crisis is attributed to poor dietary choices and lack of physical activity. In the suburb of Upanga in Dar es Salaam, 38-year-old Pragash Gupta, who was diagnosed with diabetes three years ago, routinely checks her blood glucose levels by pricking her fingers. Gupta, weighing 125kg and also recently diagnosed with high blood pressure and heart fibrillation, struggles to heed doctors’ call to make lifestyle changes, including adjusting her diet. “I check my blood glucose every morning and every night,” she says “I am supposed to do it four times, but sometimes my fingers hurt and I don’t do it as often.” Irene Masanja, an infectious diseases specialist at Bagamoyo district Hospital in Tanzania’s coastal region, says that the rising incidence of diabetes and hypertension, among HIV patients as well as in the general population, is alarming. “Early detection and intervention are key. We must empower healthcare providers and equip them with appropriate skills and knowledge to address interconnected health problems effectively,” she says. Image Credits: Courtesy Public Relations Department Muhimbili National Hospital, Muhidin Issa Michuzi, INTEAfrica. In Wake of Food Aid Workers’ Deaths, WHO Demands Stronger ‘Deconfliction’ Mechanism for Gaza Relief Missions 03/04/2024 Elaine Ruth Fletcher WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO’s Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Wednesday decried the deaths of seven aid workers by Israeli fire while delivering food aid to Palestinians in besieged northern Gaza, demanding a major revamp of “deconfliction” procedures so that aid missions could proceed safely and predictably. “WHO is horrified by the killing of 7 humanitarian workers from World Central Kitchen in Gaza on Monday. The work they were doing was saving lives, providing food to thousands of starving people,” said the director general at a press briefing. Responding to a blast of international criticism, Israel’s top military and political leadership expressed deep regret for the incident in which air force drones deliberately picked off, one by one, three cars carrying the seven aid workers affiliated with an organisation widely recognised even by Israelis as a neutral partner. The country pledged a high-level investigation of the incident. But Tedros said that the incident reflects systemic problems faced by virtually every agency mission WHO has conducted in Gaza in coordinating missions with Israel’s military through areas of Gaza that it now controls. Those problems are also putting its aid workers at risk almost daily from combat fire, as well as taking the lives of other innocent people in the past six months of war, Tedros and other senior WHO officials said. “The DG rightly highlights why we are all appalled by the killings of our colleagues, in clearly marked vehicles in a deconflicted area. It clearly shows that the deconfliction mechanism is not working,” said Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). “What is needed is an effective, transparent and workable deconfliction and notification mechanism. The UN has to be assured that convoys and facilities are not targeted. It means that assuring movement of aid in Gaza, including through checkpoints, is predictable, expedited, etc. That roads are operational and cleared.” Fraught with cancellations, delays and uncertainties Dr Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based office for the Occupied Palestinian Territories. In particular, WHO relief missions to northern Gaza, which Israel nominally controls although heavy pockets of fighting with Hamas continue – have been fraught with cancellations, delays and other uncertainties for months, Peeperkorn complained. “We see too many missions delayed or denied. It’s also making the missions which are delayed, and I’ve been on quite a few myself, more arduous and dangerous. You sometimes return at 11 o’clock at night, or past midnight. So it becomes unnecessarily dangerous.” “Even today, who my team was in an mission to the north, again, to deliver a few medical supplies, food and water, to Al-Ahli Hospital and Al-Sahabah Hospital in the north… They were, as was planned and agreed on, between 6 and 7 a.m. ready to go,” he recounted. “They went to the checkpoint, and just before the checkpoint, they’ve been waiting and waiting and waiting up till now. Now they had to return back to their to their guest houses.” Not an isolated incident Shell of WCK car that came under drone attack, with the NGOs identity clearly marked on its roof Along with the blast of international criticism, the WCK attack has been deplored widely inside Israel, where the organisation has been praised for having also delivered food aid to Israelis displaced by the Hamas attacks on Jewish communities around the perimeter of Gaza on 7 October. While the Israeli army has sought to portray the killings as a tragic, but isolated incident, critics say it reflects more systemic problems related not only to poor coordination of aid, but an expanding culture of “shoot first ask questions later.” Peeperkorn underlined that the attack also wasn’t an isolated incident for UN and WHO operations. “We shouldn’t forget that already in December, January, we have seen, unfortunately, attacks and sometimes the shooting at the UN vehicles,” he said. This included a mission to the north in which he participated in early December, he recalled. “There was an airstrike 150 meters from our car. The truck delivering medical supplies was shot at, the PRCS (Palestinian Red Crescent Society) people were shot at. And PRCS staff were actually arrested and detained for a while.” Painstaking detail for every mission prepared Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, in southern Gaza. Each WHO convoy to southern Gaza, and northward, requires painstaking preparation. Detailed planning is required for every mission WHO or its partners prepare. For WHO missions, not only international and local health workers, but also a security officer and an ordnance expert are typically included in the team as well. “It’s an enormous amount of work, and every mission that gets delayed, impeded or denied, that other missions cannot take place,” Peeperkorn said. “All of those details – the timing, the people on the missions, are shared through Israeli counterparts, and then there is agreement that the mission can take place at this hour,” he stressed. “You want to start this as early as possible. For some of the food transport, it’s even better to do that at night, before sunrise. But in the case of medical supplies, food or fuel for patients, we normally start a mission around 5 or 6 in the morning. …. Because there will always be delays, and you want to be back in daylight. A team sets out on the road only after it has received an OK from the Israeli army. “Then, normally, there’s a holding point at military checkpoints, where you have to wait again,” Peeperkorn said. “Most of the missions, there were always problems. Delays, delays, delays – and often denials in the end,” he said. “And the mission today was a good example – to bring a few medical supplies, food and water to those two hospitals in the north. “It was all agreed, they would leave at 6:30 to 7 am. First of all they don’t get a green light to go. And finally, they get a green light to go to the checkpoint…. “And then they waited before the checkpoint. And they wait and they wait and they wait. In the meantime, very little discussion. Nothing is going on. “They realize that even if they get a green light now, they can’t go to Al Sahaba anymore. They would only deliver supplies to Al Ahli hospital and then go back.” Eventually, after more waiting, they realise that “they will never be able to return [in time], and they have to cancel the mission.” Workable deconfliction “So what is a workable deconfliction mechanism?” Peeperkorn asked. “That routes are coordinated. That it’s a predictable mechanism. That the roads are going to be clear. And anyone who knows Gaza, know that there are a number of roads, which can be easily cleared and made operational. “So in a way, it’s a simple mechanism, and somehow, it has never properly worked.” Given the mass hunger that northern Gaza faces, followed by the near total destruction of Al Shifa Hospital, the area’s main health facility, over the past two weeks, those missions are needed now more than ever, Peeperkorn stressed. “There should be 50 missions going to the north every day. Multiple [missions] of food, water, shelter, and maybe one medical mission. That should be happening everywhere, including in the south,” said Peeperkorn. “And even if there’s active conflict going on, then you expect that humanitarian corridors are created, where the UN partners can safely deliver their aid and do their job. And clearly the horrific attack on WCK is clearly a sign that this is not working. “So I really do expect, whatever comes out now, that we get a functional deconfliction mechanism and a proper notification system and that the UN and partners can do their work.” Image Credits: AFP/TImes of Israel, WHO/EMRO. Health As a Driver of Innovation Not Just a Recipient 03/04/2024 Hans Henri P. Kluge An electronic blood sugar monitor makes it easier for people with diabetes to manage their disease. As WHO unveils S.A.R.A.H. (Smart AI Resource Assistant for Health), its new digital health promoter prototype powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI), and available in eight languages 24 hours a day, WHO’s Regional Director for Europe writes about harnessing innovation in health to help meet critical public health challenges, both now and in the future. Innovation has always been a driving force behind advancements in health, revolutionizing the way we prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases. And as we navigate through a rapidly evolving health landscape, embracing health innovation has become more crucial than ever. From cutting-edge technologies like mRNA vaccines to AI-driven diagnostics, the potential of innovation to transform healthcare is limitless. But for too long health has often been viewed as a passive beneficiary of innovation rather than a driver of it. It’s time to change this mentality and harness the power of innovation. The challenges we face, from global pandemics to rising chronic diseases, from a rapidly ageing population to the effects of climate change, demand creative solutions that prioritize the well-being of populations worldwide. Shifting mindsets to move health innovation needle Our sector – health – can and should be at the cutting edge of new and innovative solutions, driven by technology including AI, which is going to fundamentally change every aspect of human life over the coming century. In fact, the IMF predicts that 40% of jobs will be affected by AI in some shape or form over the coming years, including in health and care. Further, AI products and services are expected to contribute $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, more than the current output of China and India combined. However, while technological advancements have made significant strides in healthcare, social innovations and policies also play a crucial role in addressing the complex needs of diverse communities. Innovation in public health goes beyond technological breakthroughs; it involves harnessing creativity, collaboration, and sustainability, to promote equitable access to quality healthcare. To foster an environment conducive to innovation in public health, leaders and decision-makers must focus on responding to the needs of communities while closing the equity gap. We must shift the focus from solely economic returns to the broader public health impact of innovative solutions. By aligning policies with the goal of improving health outcomes for all, we can better address inequalities in healthcare access and deliver sustainable solutions that benefit society as a whole. Another strategic shift requires patients themselves to be co-creators and designers of innovation because patients are experts in their own right. They know how to navigate life living with cancer or diabetes or a physical/mental disability. Involving them in the full pathway of disease management will make solutions more relevant and sustainable, and encourage innovation at scale. Ecosystem approach As public health professionals, we are not always good at articulating how innovation meets health and societal needs. That’s why we need an ecosystem approach to innovation. By fostering collaborations between healthcare providers, technology companies, research institutions, and policymakers, a holistic ecosystem can be created to drive innovation in health. In Ireland, for example, the Health Ministry joined forces with the Department for Business, Enterprise, and Innovation to set up the Health Innovation Hub, an incubator for public health solutions. Health workers in the Health Innovation Hub spend half their time delivering care and the other half working with start-ups and health tech companies: a clear example of an ecosystem approach. Digital solutions to health, such as telemedicine, are already a reality in some countries. As we embrace innovation to tackle pressing global challenges, sustainability must remain at the core of our efforts. Innovations should not only address current needs but also contribute to long-term social, economic, and environmental sustainability. This requires a shift towards sustainable practices, circular economy models, and responsible innovation that minimizes negative impacts on both people and planet. Too often people tell me that striving for health equity is at odds with our market-driven societies; that equity somehow stifles innovation. I would strongly dispute that – there is no contradiction. But unfortunately, modern economics tends to focus only on improving efficiency – for example, getting more cancer screenings for the dollar, or squeezing the last ounce of productivity out of the health system. Equity – leaving no one behind – is not seen as the responsibility of the commercial sector but that of the state or the non-profit sector. This mindset also needs to change. A Wellbeing Economy values equity and not only revenue or “productivity”. It strives to make the world a safe and just place for humanity – and this is the true challenge for innovators. The future is already here Innovation for health brings together experts from diverse fields such as medicine, engineering, data science, and behavioural psychology. But as health is about where people live, love, work, and play, it’s also about transportation, urban planning, and agriculture. This interdisciplinary approach not only catalyses breakthrough discoveries but also nurtures a culture of cross-pollination, where ideas flourish, and boundaries are transcended – precisely the kind of culture that innovation needs to thrive. However, the pursuit of innovation for health is not without its hurdles. From regulatory barriers to financial constraints, from ethical dilemmas to data privacy concerns, the path to innovation is fraught with challenges that require careful navigation. Nevertheless, these challenges should not deter us but rather galvanize our resolve to push the boundaries of what is possible. By fostering a culture of innovation, nurturing creative minds, and empowering diverse stakeholders to collaborate, we can address the most pressing challenges of our time. Embracing emerging technologies, exploring new frontiers in science and medicine, and prioritizing social innovations will pave the way for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future and help countries in the hard-pressed challenge of reaching the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. We are well and truly in an era of ever accelerating innovation in health, bringing with it boundless possibilities for improving our collective health and wellbeing, generating jobs, and growing our economies. But health leaders are not yet fully equipped to navigate this new world, so full of exciting potential, with confidence. The health sector must be ready and equipped to embrace innovation across all dimensions, strengthening health and wellbeing. Or run the risk of being left behind, squandering the opportunities of today and jeopardizing the very future of health itself. The choice is clear. Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge is WHO Regional Director for Europe Innovation ecosystem for public health Digital health – WHO/Europe AI ethics and governance guidance Image Credits: Uka Borrgeaard/ WHO, Juliana Tan/ WHO, WHO. Uganda’s Constitutional Court Greenlights Draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 03/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Uganda’s Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera (centre) delivers the Constitutional Court ruling. Uganda’s Constitutional Court ruled on Wednesday that the country’s draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 complies with the country’s Constitution in all but four aspects. “We decline to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety neither would we grant a permanent injunction against its enforcement,” Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera, told the Kampala courtroom and a capacity Zoom audience of 500. The four sections that were struck down by the five-judge panel – 3 (2c), 9, 11 (2d) and 14 – were “inconsistent with right to health, privacy and freedom of religion”, according to the court. UPDATE: The Constitutional Court has declined to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety.#NTVNews#AntiHomosexualAct pic.twitter.com/nQGIoe3sUA — NTV UGANDA (@ntvuganda) April 3, 2024 “The nullified sections had criminalised the letting of premises for use for homosexual purposes, the failure by anyone to report acts of homosexuality to the police for appropriate action, and the engagement in acts of homosexuality by anyone which results into the other persons contracting a terminal illness,” according to a statement from the court. Buteera said that the mandatory reporting to authorities of people suspected of having committed homosexual offences violated individual rights. While the court has struck down the possibility of landlords being imprisoned for renting premises to homosexuals, it has maintained that prison terms of up to 20 years for journalists “promoting homosexuality” were legitimate. In delivering the unanimous judgement, Buteera said that constraints on the media aligned with sections of the country’s Communications Act and Anti-Pornography Act, which “aim to uphold societal morals by limiting the use of media to publish or broadcast offensive material”. The Act’s legitimacy was contested by 22 Ugandan human rights advocates including Member of Parliament Fox Oywelowo Odoi (the only MP to vote against the Act), legal academics Prof. Sylvia Tamale and Rutaro Robert and Bishop James Lubega Banda. They said that it violated various constitutional rights, including the right to privacy and freedom from discrimination, as well as going against Uganda’s international human rights commitments. Frank Mugisha, of Sexual Minorities Uganda and Convening for Equality co-convener, described the ruling as “wrong and deplorable”, and called on “all governments, UN partners, and multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the Global Fund to likewise intensify their demand that this law be struck down”. “This ruling should result in further restrictions to funding for Uganda – no donor should be funding anti-LGBTQ+ hate and human rights violations,” said Mugisha, one of Uganda’s most prominent LGBTQ activists. Nicholas Opiyo of human rights group Chapter Four Uganda, said his organisation “vehemently disagrees” with the court’s finding and the basis on which it was reached. “We approached the court expecting it to apply the law in defence of human rights and not rely on public sentiments, and vague cultural values arguments,” said Opiyo. Life sentence and death penalty Protests have been held worldwide in support of the Ugandan LGBTI community as it faces attack. The Anti-Homosexuality Act introduces “the offence of homosexuality”, with a potential life sentence for a same-sex “sexual act”. It also allows the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”, including sex acts with children, disabled people or those drugged against their will, or committed by people living with HIV – actions that are already criminalised by other laws. Since the Act was passed last May, the World Bank has suspended new loans to Uganda and the US President’s Emergency Plan to Fight AIDS (Pepfar) has declined to advance plans for the country. There has also been widespread condemnation of the law. Buteera claimed that the Act had been passed “against the backdrop of the recruitment of children into the practice of homosexuality. That is the mischief that Section 11 [dealing with the “promotion of homosexuality”] of the Act seeks to address.” ‘Absence of global consensus’ on LGBTQ rights The court presented seven points as the basis for its decision, including that “sister jurisdictions” have “decriminalised consensual homosexuality between adults in private space”. However, it referred to the absence of global consensus “regarding non-discrimination based sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC)”. “This is reflected in the fact that to date non-discrimination on the basis of the SOGIESC variables has not explicitly found its way into international human rights treaties. Instead, it has been ‘vetoed’ by a bloc of resistant (UN) member states that has prevented the adoption of a binding declaration or similar instrument to strengthen protections for LGBTI human rights,” according to the court. The court also referred to conflicts between “a universal understanding of human rights and respecting the diversity and freedom of human cultures” and between “individuals’ right to self-determination, self-perception and bodily autonomy, on the one hand; and the communal or societal right to social, political and cultural self-determination” on the other. Finally, it described the Anti-Homosexuality Act as “a reflection of the socio-cultural realities of the Ugandan society, and was passed by an overwhelming majority of the democratically elected representatives of the Ugandan citizens”. Win for government Dr Adrian Jjuukho, Ugandan human rights lawyer and executive director of Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF), which was one of the petitioners against the Act, described the ruling as “only intended to please donors in the health sector so that they can continue to provide the funds that are much needed while sacrificing LGBTI persons in the process”. “The Court has nullified provisions that directly impede health service provision including reporting obligations, and where the victim acquires a terminal illness. This clears the way for health funding but does not actually clear the way for proper service provision,” said Jjuukho, writing on X (Twitter). 1. The Constitutional Court just delivered what would be a win-win judgment – intended to please all parties. Unfortunately, this only pleases one party – the government, which will most likely get its World Bank and Global Fund money as the LGBT community continues to be muzzled — Dr. Adrian Jjuuko (@jjuukoa) April 3, 2024 In a guarded statement, UNAIDS Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa Anne Githuku-Shongwe, said that “evidence shows that criminalizing populations most at risk of HIV, such as the LGBTQ+ communities, obstructs access to life-saving health and HIV services, which undermines public health and the overall HIV response in the country.” “To achieve the goal of ending the AIDS pandemic by 2030, it is vital to ensure that everyone has equal access to health services without fear,” she added. UNAIDS provided evidence in support of the petitioners on certain clauses via an amicus brief. Meanwhile, Ugandan feminist lawyer Sunshine Fionah Komusana told Health Policy Watch that “the ruling impacts everyone”. “With the kind of government we have, I don’t know how anyone would be celebrating, knowing very well the different tags they use to deny people freedom of expression and association.,” said Komusana. “Anti-human rights groups are gaining ground and before we know it, these kinds of legislation will be feeding into retraction of several other rights. See examples of reintroduction of legislation to legalise female genital mutilation and child marriages in some countries. These legislations harm all of us.” Uganda’s laws were robust enough to address paedophilia, and they already criminalised LGBTQIA+ people; this new law will affect you, political opponent candidates and your children. It is far-reaching and ambiguous. Anyone can be guilty. #ResistAHA23 pic.twitter.com/trWllorXf6 — Uganda Feminist Forum (UFF) (@UgFeministForum) June 29, 2023 Hundreds of people have already been arrested and attacked since the Act was introduced last May. In one case, a man was attacked in his home by a group of men one night. He was beaten and some of his property burnt by the mob, which accused him of being a homosexual. In a similar incident, a lesbian was attacked by two men in her home. She had been evicted by her landlord on the grounds of homosexuality but did not have the resources to move. International reaction to the court’s ruling will no doubt be keenly watched by countries contemplating their own anti-LGBTQ laws, such as Ghana, Kenya, South Sudan and Tanzania. In February, Ghana’s Parliament unanimously passed one of the world’s most draconian anti-LGBTIQ Bills which includes a mandatory three-year prison sentence for a person who simply “identifies” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or queer”. However, the president has yet to sign it into law. Image Credits: Alisdare Hickson/Flickr. Continued Mpox Outbreak Leads US to Re-examine Smallpox Readiness 03/04/2024 Sophia Samantaroy Although smallpox has been eradicated, it is possib;le to recreate it from published genomes. In the wake of surging mpox cases in the DRC and the emergence of novel orthopoxviruses, the US needs to rapidly bolster its smallpox readiness, preparedness, and response, according to a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report brought together experts from across the country to critically evaluate the state of smallpox vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics, known as medical countermeasures (MCMs), in the event of an outbreak. Improving MCMs is crucial for enhancing the nation’s ability to combat a smallpox outbreak or deliberate attack, the report emphasizes. It also stresses the importance of fortifying public health and healthcare systems to swiftly and effectively respond, including mechanisms for rapid vaccine distribution. An ‘evolving bio-threat and technology landscape’ With advancements in genome sequencing and editing technology, it is now possible to recreate live smallpox virus from published genomes, the report warns. US population changes and advancements in gene editing and synthesis technologies have drastically altered the potential for a smallpox outbreak or attack in recent years. But these technologies significantly raise the risk of accidental or intentional release, challenging readiness planning and potentially altering the epidemiology and clinical presentations of the disease. The report notes that even if all existing collections of the virus were destroyed, reemergence is still a threat. Despite the risks, the report underscores the necessity of continued research involving live variola virus for developing and enhancing smallpox MCMs. This research is essential for creating more effective therapies, validating vaccine and treatment efficacy, and establishing animal models for research purposes. Research using these viruses can also fill gaps in our fundamental understanding of orthopoxvirus biology, ecology, evolution, transmission, and disease onset in humans. A call for MCM research and development Three main categories of MCMs need improvement: diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics. More accurate diagnostic tests to detect smallpox and related viruses at earlier stages is paramount. Vaccine safety is also an issue, and the report calls for research into vaccines that can be used across different populations and that are available as a single dose. “Developing new smallpox vaccines that use a multi-vaccine platform – which use common vaccine vectors, manufacturing ingredients, and processes – would improve the capacity for rapid production and reduce the need for stockpiling.” Lastly, the report advocates for safer and more diversified therapeutics, such as antivirals with different and diverse targets, mechanisms, and routes of administration, to supplement existing antivirals. Vulnerabilities: too few manufacturers The smallpox vaccine protects against mpox. The report concluded that the small number of manufacturers capable of producing smallpox medical countermeasures is a specific vulnerability, and that there is currently insufficient capacity to scale production in the event of a large outbreak or attack. Logistics and supply chain management planning is critical, as is planning for regulatory responsiveness. Clinical and public health guidance also needs to be updated to reflect new data and medical countermeasures so that health care providers and others on the front line of public health have the capability and capacity to respond to smallpox. The need for global cooperation Both the COVID-19 pandemic and mpox outbreaks revealed gaps in the US’s ability to respond to new infectious diseases. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the ability of US public health and health care systems to adapt and respond to an unfamiliar pathogen. Mpox, on the other hand, showed the challenges of rapidly making diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics available at scale. Furthermore, the mpox outbreak brought to light the lack of diverse smallpox therapeutics options. Currently, standard research methods rely on challenge studies in animals to understand MCM efficacy in humans, leading to issues with accurately understanding the safety and efficacy in humans. “The gaps in our ability to respond to a new infectious disease were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent mpox outbreak,” said committee chair Prof Larry Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law and professor of medicine at Georgetown University. “It is vital to prioritize research into the development of safer and more effective smallpox diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, make judicious choices in stockpiling, and have modern, well-practiced, and adaptable plans for responding in the event of a smallpox outbreak,” added Gostin, who is also director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Research and development for these MCMs needs to not only consider the actual device or product, but also the ability to “deploy at scale” and equitably to meet the challenges of public acceptance. The report urges effective risk communication for vaccines, as the same challenges with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation could occur in a smallpox outbreak. While the report primarily focused on US readiness and response capabilities, it does note the impact of growing global interdependence in detecting and containing potential smallpox outbreaks. “The COVID-19 pandemic and pox multi-country outbreak, both declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) by WHO, underscore the need for further domestic global coordination for preparedness and response against novel pathogens including orthopoxvirus events,” note the report authors. This means preemptively supporting international MCM capacity as any US response will be “significantly affected” by the ability of other countries to detect and surveil. The report notes that global solidarity is a key component to rapidly identify, contain, respond, and ensure equitable MCM allocation in a smallpox event. Preparedness for similar viruses Smallpox-related viruses such as mpox, Alaskapox, and cowpox are increasingly found in humans, magnifying the need for medical countermeasures that can detect, treat, and prevent these diseases. The report notes that most mpox therapeutics were developed because of investments in smallpox therapeutics. “Direct investment in developing therapeutics targeting circulating orthopoxviruses could similarly benefit smallpox therapeutic preparedness and would likely have more immediate utility and potentially achieve commercial viability.” Image Credits: Isao Arita/ WHO. Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tanzania Merges HIV and Diabetes Care to Tackle NCD Crisis 04/04/2024 Kizito Makoye A diabetic patient with kidney complications receiving dialysis treatment at the Muhimbili National Hospital in Non-communicable diseases like hypertension and diabetes have emerged as serious health crises in developing countries, as HIV was a decade ago. New models of primary health care that combine NCD and HIV care are catching on – and Tanzania is implementing this approach. DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania – Lying on a neatly made bed at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Zaituni Kashozi is recovering from surgery to amputate her gnarled toes that were infected by diabetic ulcers. Wrapped in iodine-stained bandage, her left foot dangles on a string attached to an aluminium bar that helps to propel her feeble blood circulation. The 74-year-old, who has grappled with diabetes for three decades, woke up to a grim reality a year ago when insidious infections took root, forcing her to go under the surgeon’s scalpel. “I don’t feel any pain on my feet. All the sense of touch is gone. Even if you prick me with a needle, I won’t feel it. What a terrible disease,” Kashozi laments. Within the walls of this 1,500-bed medical facility, the toll of diabetes is strikingly evident. Ward after ward echoes with the woes of chronic foot ulcers even blindness – a reflection of the toll diabetes is taking on the urban populace. Diabetes, a chronic metabolic disease, poses a serious health threat that can affect the heart, blood vessels, eyes, kidneys and nerves. An estimated 12.8% of the population had diabetes by 2021 – up from around 2.8% in a decade. However, cardiovascular disease such as strokes and heart attacks – often driven by hypertension – is the biggest NCD killer in the country. Many people are unaware that they have either hypertension or diabetes until very late. The elderly, like Kashozi, bear a huge burden of NCDs, and around 90% of those aged 50 and above navigate the labyrinth of health challenges without the safety net of health insurance, forcing them to dart between hospitals frantically seeking elusive medical care. HIV and NCD management under one roof On the other side of the city, Halfani Ali, a 53-year-old father of five, is struggling with the dual challenges of HIV/AIDS and diabetes. Since his HIV diagnosis in 2003, Ali has been receiving care and medication at various health centres across the city. However, in 2013, Ali’s life took an unexpected turn when he was diagnosed with diabetes. This dual burden of disease has presented a complex challenge, forcing him to juggle HIV and diabetes appointments at two different health centres. Recognizing the struggles faced by individuals like Ali, the Temeke Regional Referral Hospital in Dar es Salaam (TRRH) integrated health care for NCDs within the ambit of HIV services in 2023. Now individuals like Ali can manage coexisting conditions like diabetes and hypertension under the same roof. “I am very happy because I get all my medication at Temeke Hospital. I don’t have to travel all the way to Kariakoo to see a diabetes specialist,” says Ali, reflecting the relief he has experienced with the integrated approach. A health worker takes blood sample from Sultani Ally Kessy to test for diabetes during a diabetes camp at Temeke Regional Referral Hospital. Maria Bitwale, a senior oncologist at Temeke Hospital, says many HIV patients with diabetes are now seeking treatment, and the integrated approach is helping to deter potential health crisis triggered by diabetic complications. On a bright Saturday morning, Ali approaches the physician’s desk where his examination unfolds meticulously. Bitwale, armed with a patellar hammer, probes the nuances of his nerves, safeguarding against the perils of diabetic complications. Ali’s eyes light up as he recounts the doctor’s advice on nerve function control and a prescribed diet, ensuring he remains in robust health. In this amalgamation of medical expertise and personal resilience, Ali’s story is testimony to the success of integrated healthcare approach for killer diabetes, HIV and hypertension – diseases which previously could have led to a death sentence, alone or together. HIV is an entry point for NCD care In Tanzania, over 1.4 million people out of the country’s 61 million population are living with HIV. Of these, an estimated 29% have hypertension and 13% have diabetes. And it is these latter diseases that are now the main causes of death in Tanzanians living with HIV today. Integrating up NCDs care into HIV services, which are widely available at the primary health care level, is the one new model being used to diagnose, prevent and manage leading chronic diseases in a cost-effective manner. John Njingu, Tanzania’s Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Health, emphasises that integration of NCDs into primary healthcare facilities nationwide, extending to HIV-targeted clinics, where the screening and management of NCDs are offered to people with or without HIV under one roof. “We want to bring better health care services to the people at lower cost to the service providers and the patients themselves,” he told Health Policy Watch in an interview. The NCD response in Tanzania took a major leap forward in 2019 on World Diabetes Day, when a new National NCD Prevention and Control Programme was launched by Tanzania’s Prime Minister, Kassim Majaliwa. The NCD strategy has been rolled out in 700 primary health care clinics in 26 regions across Tanzania, 245 of them in the first stage. These PHC centres have been provided with basic NCD diagnostic equipment, and over 3,000 health care staff working at the centres have been trained in basic NCD care. The new programme builds on several years of effort by the Ministry of Health and national stakeholders to establish the necessary platform for NCD services to reach communities. The new strategy has been supported by a range of national as well as international partners, including World Health Organization (WHO), the Global Fund, the US President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and UNAIDS. The WHO guidelines call for HIV-NCD service integration across the continuum of care as does the 2021 Political Declaration of the UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting on HIV and AIDS. But there is still a long way to go, as the country has a total of 8,549 primary, secondary and tertiary heath facilities, according to the Ministry of Health. ‘Unprecedented’ in sub-Saharan Africa “What we have seen unfolding in Tanzania with basic NCD services for very common conditions such as diabetes and hypertension now reaching primary care across the country at this scale is arguably unprecedented in a sub-Saharan African context,” says Bent Lautrup-Nielsen, head of global advocacy at the World Diabetes Foundation (WDF). WDF began supporting NCD interventions in the country two decades ago, and has played a key supporting role in the new NCD programme launch. “With the strong results on NCDs achieved by the Ministry of Health, the President’s Office for Regional Administration of Local Government and key national partners such as Tanzania Diabetes Association and Tanzania NCD Alliance, the prospect of integrated primary care with NCDs becoming part of routine services everywhere alongside HIV, TB and maternal and newborn care are now quite promising,” said Lautrup-Nielsen. The INTE-Africa research team and stakeholders in Tanzania New research findings demonstrating the benefits of integration also have helped pave the way for broader change. In a ground-breaking study dubbed INTE-Africa, conducted in Tanzania and Uganda in 2022, scientists documented the benefits of merging and decentralising services for HIV, diabetes, and hypertension in terms of disease management and cost-savings. The study, published in The Lancet in 2023, found that integrated management resulted in a 75% higher rate of retention in care for people with HIV and one or more NCD conditions; did not adversely affect viral suppression rates among people with HIV; and was cost-saving in terms of the health services provided. The researchers randomly allocated 32 health facilities (17 in Uganda and 15 in Tanzania) serving 7,028 eligible patients, to integrated care or standard care groups. In the integrated care group, participants with HIV, diabetes or hypertension, were managed by the same health workers, used the same pharmacy, and had uniform medical records, registration and laboratory services. In the standard care group, patients attended separate standalone clinics for each condition, following the standard practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Data collection was conducted at baseline, as well as months six and 12. Retention was assessed through routine clinic attendance and track-and-trace procedures. Roadmap for policymakers The study’s findings lay out a roadmap for policymakers, not just in Tanzania and Uganda, but more widely across Africa for scaling up integrated care for conditions such as HIV, diabetes, and hypertension, saving money while providing effective care. The idea of anchoring such care in HIV clinics is based on the success in providing HIV patients with steady care, resulting in dramatic suppression of viral load. The death toll for this group has plunged from a peak of two million annual deaths in the early 2000s to fewer than 500,000 deaths in 2022, researchers say. Inspired by the INTE-Africa trial, Tanzania, which had for many years embraced infectious diseases as its priority in health policy and resources allocations, is undergoing a seismic shift in its primary health care services to address the new NCD crisis. The integration of HIV, diabetes and hypertension services has earned global recognition, as reflected in the NCD Alliance’s Spending Wisely report, which also found “evidence is strong that integrated services can deliver health impact.” The shift in Tanzania’s policy also aligns with the evolving strategy of the Global Fund dubbed Prioritization Framework Supporting Health Longevity Among People Living with HIV, which articulates the opportunities and priorities for integrated investments to prevents, identify and managed advanced HIV disease and NCDs, among other diseases, for the period of 2023-2025. The strategy calls for integrating NCD services into other services designed for people living with HIV, especially those over the age of 50. Countries are encouraged to align services with the WHO package of essential NCD disease interventions for primary health care focusing on cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes and early diagnosis of cancer. Global Fund specialist Dan Koros told Health Policy Watch that the Fund’s support for NCD Integration into HIV programs in Tanzania began in January 2024 with a grant of $115,075 – primarily for carrying out baseline assessment, developing protocols and training healthcare workers for the period of 2024-2026. The Global Fund investments aim to support integrated diagnosis and treatment of HIV positive adults over the age of 40 and on antiretroviral treatment, who are also receiving treatment for one or more NCD, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and mental health conditions. Anna Mlengu, who suffers from diabetes, consults a doctor at Hindul Mandal Hospital in Dar es Salaam. NCD’s – highest premature mortality is in LMICs Globally the NCDs are the leading cause of death, killing 41 million people each year-equivalent to 71% of all deaths worldwide. And the highest rates of premature mortality – that is deaths before the age of 70, are in low- and middle-income countries, particularly Africa. Across the WHO’s African region, patients suffering from diabetes and hypertension are neglected, with less than half remaining in care one year after diagnosis, leading to approximately two million deaths each year, medical researchers say. And when their disease condition is addressed later in life, it also makes treatment much more complex. Many elderly patients like Kashozi, suffering from diabetic ulcers and related complications, do not always get access to specialised care. “The ageing process affects immune function and slower wound healing, making the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers even harder,” says Zawadi Chiwanga, senior endocrinologist and lead surgeon in Kashozi’s case. “Diabetic ulcers can be particularly insidious, often manifesting silently without the knowledge of a patient until they reach an advanced stage,” Chiwanga told Health Policy Watch. Diabetes affects younger people too While traditionally Tanzanians perceived diabetes as a disease that primarily haunts the elderly, the city of Dar es Salaam, one of Africa’s fastest growing urban areas, bears witness to a different reality. From Tandale, a labyrinthine slum, to the upscale enclave of Masaki, favoured by Western diplomats, and further to Kariakoo, a business hub replete with fast- food joints, youth obesity is on the rise – accompanied by an alarming surge in diabetes cases. Out of the 613,210 patients screened for diabetes at MHN in the last six months, an estimated 165,566 individuals (27%), were diagnosed with diabetes, hospital records show. Along with the toll of co-infections, this silent crisis is attributed to poor dietary choices and lack of physical activity. In the suburb of Upanga in Dar es Salaam, 38-year-old Pragash Gupta, who was diagnosed with diabetes three years ago, routinely checks her blood glucose levels by pricking her fingers. Gupta, weighing 125kg and also recently diagnosed with high blood pressure and heart fibrillation, struggles to heed doctors’ call to make lifestyle changes, including adjusting her diet. “I check my blood glucose every morning and every night,” she says “I am supposed to do it four times, but sometimes my fingers hurt and I don’t do it as often.” Irene Masanja, an infectious diseases specialist at Bagamoyo district Hospital in Tanzania’s coastal region, says that the rising incidence of diabetes and hypertension, among HIV patients as well as in the general population, is alarming. “Early detection and intervention are key. We must empower healthcare providers and equip them with appropriate skills and knowledge to address interconnected health problems effectively,” she says. Image Credits: Courtesy Public Relations Department Muhimbili National Hospital, Muhidin Issa Michuzi, INTEAfrica. In Wake of Food Aid Workers’ Deaths, WHO Demands Stronger ‘Deconfliction’ Mechanism for Gaza Relief Missions 03/04/2024 Elaine Ruth Fletcher WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO’s Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Wednesday decried the deaths of seven aid workers by Israeli fire while delivering food aid to Palestinians in besieged northern Gaza, demanding a major revamp of “deconfliction” procedures so that aid missions could proceed safely and predictably. “WHO is horrified by the killing of 7 humanitarian workers from World Central Kitchen in Gaza on Monday. The work they were doing was saving lives, providing food to thousands of starving people,” said the director general at a press briefing. Responding to a blast of international criticism, Israel’s top military and political leadership expressed deep regret for the incident in which air force drones deliberately picked off, one by one, three cars carrying the seven aid workers affiliated with an organisation widely recognised even by Israelis as a neutral partner. The country pledged a high-level investigation of the incident. But Tedros said that the incident reflects systemic problems faced by virtually every agency mission WHO has conducted in Gaza in coordinating missions with Israel’s military through areas of Gaza that it now controls. Those problems are also putting its aid workers at risk almost daily from combat fire, as well as taking the lives of other innocent people in the past six months of war, Tedros and other senior WHO officials said. “The DG rightly highlights why we are all appalled by the killings of our colleagues, in clearly marked vehicles in a deconflicted area. It clearly shows that the deconfliction mechanism is not working,” said Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). “What is needed is an effective, transparent and workable deconfliction and notification mechanism. The UN has to be assured that convoys and facilities are not targeted. It means that assuring movement of aid in Gaza, including through checkpoints, is predictable, expedited, etc. That roads are operational and cleared.” Fraught with cancellations, delays and uncertainties Dr Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based office for the Occupied Palestinian Territories. In particular, WHO relief missions to northern Gaza, which Israel nominally controls although heavy pockets of fighting with Hamas continue – have been fraught with cancellations, delays and other uncertainties for months, Peeperkorn complained. “We see too many missions delayed or denied. It’s also making the missions which are delayed, and I’ve been on quite a few myself, more arduous and dangerous. You sometimes return at 11 o’clock at night, or past midnight. So it becomes unnecessarily dangerous.” “Even today, who my team was in an mission to the north, again, to deliver a few medical supplies, food and water, to Al-Ahli Hospital and Al-Sahabah Hospital in the north… They were, as was planned and agreed on, between 6 and 7 a.m. ready to go,” he recounted. “They went to the checkpoint, and just before the checkpoint, they’ve been waiting and waiting and waiting up till now. Now they had to return back to their to their guest houses.” Not an isolated incident Shell of WCK car that came under drone attack, with the NGOs identity clearly marked on its roof Along with the blast of international criticism, the WCK attack has been deplored widely inside Israel, where the organisation has been praised for having also delivered food aid to Israelis displaced by the Hamas attacks on Jewish communities around the perimeter of Gaza on 7 October. While the Israeli army has sought to portray the killings as a tragic, but isolated incident, critics say it reflects more systemic problems related not only to poor coordination of aid, but an expanding culture of “shoot first ask questions later.” Peeperkorn underlined that the attack also wasn’t an isolated incident for UN and WHO operations. “We shouldn’t forget that already in December, January, we have seen, unfortunately, attacks and sometimes the shooting at the UN vehicles,” he said. This included a mission to the north in which he participated in early December, he recalled. “There was an airstrike 150 meters from our car. The truck delivering medical supplies was shot at, the PRCS (Palestinian Red Crescent Society) people were shot at. And PRCS staff were actually arrested and detained for a while.” Painstaking detail for every mission prepared Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, in southern Gaza. Each WHO convoy to southern Gaza, and northward, requires painstaking preparation. Detailed planning is required for every mission WHO or its partners prepare. For WHO missions, not only international and local health workers, but also a security officer and an ordnance expert are typically included in the team as well. “It’s an enormous amount of work, and every mission that gets delayed, impeded or denied, that other missions cannot take place,” Peeperkorn said. “All of those details – the timing, the people on the missions, are shared through Israeli counterparts, and then there is agreement that the mission can take place at this hour,” he stressed. “You want to start this as early as possible. For some of the food transport, it’s even better to do that at night, before sunrise. But in the case of medical supplies, food or fuel for patients, we normally start a mission around 5 or 6 in the morning. …. Because there will always be delays, and you want to be back in daylight. A team sets out on the road only after it has received an OK from the Israeli army. “Then, normally, there’s a holding point at military checkpoints, where you have to wait again,” Peeperkorn said. “Most of the missions, there were always problems. Delays, delays, delays – and often denials in the end,” he said. “And the mission today was a good example – to bring a few medical supplies, food and water to those two hospitals in the north. “It was all agreed, they would leave at 6:30 to 7 am. First of all they don’t get a green light to go. And finally, they get a green light to go to the checkpoint…. “And then they waited before the checkpoint. And they wait and they wait and they wait. In the meantime, very little discussion. Nothing is going on. “They realize that even if they get a green light now, they can’t go to Al Sahaba anymore. They would only deliver supplies to Al Ahli hospital and then go back.” Eventually, after more waiting, they realise that “they will never be able to return [in time], and they have to cancel the mission.” Workable deconfliction “So what is a workable deconfliction mechanism?” Peeperkorn asked. “That routes are coordinated. That it’s a predictable mechanism. That the roads are going to be clear. And anyone who knows Gaza, know that there are a number of roads, which can be easily cleared and made operational. “So in a way, it’s a simple mechanism, and somehow, it has never properly worked.” Given the mass hunger that northern Gaza faces, followed by the near total destruction of Al Shifa Hospital, the area’s main health facility, over the past two weeks, those missions are needed now more than ever, Peeperkorn stressed. “There should be 50 missions going to the north every day. Multiple [missions] of food, water, shelter, and maybe one medical mission. That should be happening everywhere, including in the south,” said Peeperkorn. “And even if there’s active conflict going on, then you expect that humanitarian corridors are created, where the UN partners can safely deliver their aid and do their job. And clearly the horrific attack on WCK is clearly a sign that this is not working. “So I really do expect, whatever comes out now, that we get a functional deconfliction mechanism and a proper notification system and that the UN and partners can do their work.” Image Credits: AFP/TImes of Israel, WHO/EMRO. Health As a Driver of Innovation Not Just a Recipient 03/04/2024 Hans Henri P. Kluge An electronic blood sugar monitor makes it easier for people with diabetes to manage their disease. As WHO unveils S.A.R.A.H. (Smart AI Resource Assistant for Health), its new digital health promoter prototype powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI), and available in eight languages 24 hours a day, WHO’s Regional Director for Europe writes about harnessing innovation in health to help meet critical public health challenges, both now and in the future. Innovation has always been a driving force behind advancements in health, revolutionizing the way we prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases. And as we navigate through a rapidly evolving health landscape, embracing health innovation has become more crucial than ever. From cutting-edge technologies like mRNA vaccines to AI-driven diagnostics, the potential of innovation to transform healthcare is limitless. But for too long health has often been viewed as a passive beneficiary of innovation rather than a driver of it. It’s time to change this mentality and harness the power of innovation. The challenges we face, from global pandemics to rising chronic diseases, from a rapidly ageing population to the effects of climate change, demand creative solutions that prioritize the well-being of populations worldwide. Shifting mindsets to move health innovation needle Our sector – health – can and should be at the cutting edge of new and innovative solutions, driven by technology including AI, which is going to fundamentally change every aspect of human life over the coming century. In fact, the IMF predicts that 40% of jobs will be affected by AI in some shape or form over the coming years, including in health and care. Further, AI products and services are expected to contribute $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, more than the current output of China and India combined. However, while technological advancements have made significant strides in healthcare, social innovations and policies also play a crucial role in addressing the complex needs of diverse communities. Innovation in public health goes beyond technological breakthroughs; it involves harnessing creativity, collaboration, and sustainability, to promote equitable access to quality healthcare. To foster an environment conducive to innovation in public health, leaders and decision-makers must focus on responding to the needs of communities while closing the equity gap. We must shift the focus from solely economic returns to the broader public health impact of innovative solutions. By aligning policies with the goal of improving health outcomes for all, we can better address inequalities in healthcare access and deliver sustainable solutions that benefit society as a whole. Another strategic shift requires patients themselves to be co-creators and designers of innovation because patients are experts in their own right. They know how to navigate life living with cancer or diabetes or a physical/mental disability. Involving them in the full pathway of disease management will make solutions more relevant and sustainable, and encourage innovation at scale. Ecosystem approach As public health professionals, we are not always good at articulating how innovation meets health and societal needs. That’s why we need an ecosystem approach to innovation. By fostering collaborations between healthcare providers, technology companies, research institutions, and policymakers, a holistic ecosystem can be created to drive innovation in health. In Ireland, for example, the Health Ministry joined forces with the Department for Business, Enterprise, and Innovation to set up the Health Innovation Hub, an incubator for public health solutions. Health workers in the Health Innovation Hub spend half their time delivering care and the other half working with start-ups and health tech companies: a clear example of an ecosystem approach. Digital solutions to health, such as telemedicine, are already a reality in some countries. As we embrace innovation to tackle pressing global challenges, sustainability must remain at the core of our efforts. Innovations should not only address current needs but also contribute to long-term social, economic, and environmental sustainability. This requires a shift towards sustainable practices, circular economy models, and responsible innovation that minimizes negative impacts on both people and planet. Too often people tell me that striving for health equity is at odds with our market-driven societies; that equity somehow stifles innovation. I would strongly dispute that – there is no contradiction. But unfortunately, modern economics tends to focus only on improving efficiency – for example, getting more cancer screenings for the dollar, or squeezing the last ounce of productivity out of the health system. Equity – leaving no one behind – is not seen as the responsibility of the commercial sector but that of the state or the non-profit sector. This mindset also needs to change. A Wellbeing Economy values equity and not only revenue or “productivity”. It strives to make the world a safe and just place for humanity – and this is the true challenge for innovators. The future is already here Innovation for health brings together experts from diverse fields such as medicine, engineering, data science, and behavioural psychology. But as health is about where people live, love, work, and play, it’s also about transportation, urban planning, and agriculture. This interdisciplinary approach not only catalyses breakthrough discoveries but also nurtures a culture of cross-pollination, where ideas flourish, and boundaries are transcended – precisely the kind of culture that innovation needs to thrive. However, the pursuit of innovation for health is not without its hurdles. From regulatory barriers to financial constraints, from ethical dilemmas to data privacy concerns, the path to innovation is fraught with challenges that require careful navigation. Nevertheless, these challenges should not deter us but rather galvanize our resolve to push the boundaries of what is possible. By fostering a culture of innovation, nurturing creative minds, and empowering diverse stakeholders to collaborate, we can address the most pressing challenges of our time. Embracing emerging technologies, exploring new frontiers in science and medicine, and prioritizing social innovations will pave the way for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future and help countries in the hard-pressed challenge of reaching the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. We are well and truly in an era of ever accelerating innovation in health, bringing with it boundless possibilities for improving our collective health and wellbeing, generating jobs, and growing our economies. But health leaders are not yet fully equipped to navigate this new world, so full of exciting potential, with confidence. The health sector must be ready and equipped to embrace innovation across all dimensions, strengthening health and wellbeing. Or run the risk of being left behind, squandering the opportunities of today and jeopardizing the very future of health itself. The choice is clear. Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge is WHO Regional Director for Europe Innovation ecosystem for public health Digital health – WHO/Europe AI ethics and governance guidance Image Credits: Uka Borrgeaard/ WHO, Juliana Tan/ WHO, WHO. Uganda’s Constitutional Court Greenlights Draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 03/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Uganda’s Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera (centre) delivers the Constitutional Court ruling. Uganda’s Constitutional Court ruled on Wednesday that the country’s draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 complies with the country’s Constitution in all but four aspects. “We decline to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety neither would we grant a permanent injunction against its enforcement,” Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera, told the Kampala courtroom and a capacity Zoom audience of 500. The four sections that were struck down by the five-judge panel – 3 (2c), 9, 11 (2d) and 14 – were “inconsistent with right to health, privacy and freedom of religion”, according to the court. UPDATE: The Constitutional Court has declined to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety.#NTVNews#AntiHomosexualAct pic.twitter.com/nQGIoe3sUA — NTV UGANDA (@ntvuganda) April 3, 2024 “The nullified sections had criminalised the letting of premises for use for homosexual purposes, the failure by anyone to report acts of homosexuality to the police for appropriate action, and the engagement in acts of homosexuality by anyone which results into the other persons contracting a terminal illness,” according to a statement from the court. Buteera said that the mandatory reporting to authorities of people suspected of having committed homosexual offences violated individual rights. While the court has struck down the possibility of landlords being imprisoned for renting premises to homosexuals, it has maintained that prison terms of up to 20 years for journalists “promoting homosexuality” were legitimate. In delivering the unanimous judgement, Buteera said that constraints on the media aligned with sections of the country’s Communications Act and Anti-Pornography Act, which “aim to uphold societal morals by limiting the use of media to publish or broadcast offensive material”. The Act’s legitimacy was contested by 22 Ugandan human rights advocates including Member of Parliament Fox Oywelowo Odoi (the only MP to vote against the Act), legal academics Prof. Sylvia Tamale and Rutaro Robert and Bishop James Lubega Banda. They said that it violated various constitutional rights, including the right to privacy and freedom from discrimination, as well as going against Uganda’s international human rights commitments. Frank Mugisha, of Sexual Minorities Uganda and Convening for Equality co-convener, described the ruling as “wrong and deplorable”, and called on “all governments, UN partners, and multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the Global Fund to likewise intensify their demand that this law be struck down”. “This ruling should result in further restrictions to funding for Uganda – no donor should be funding anti-LGBTQ+ hate and human rights violations,” said Mugisha, one of Uganda’s most prominent LGBTQ activists. Nicholas Opiyo of human rights group Chapter Four Uganda, said his organisation “vehemently disagrees” with the court’s finding and the basis on which it was reached. “We approached the court expecting it to apply the law in defence of human rights and not rely on public sentiments, and vague cultural values arguments,” said Opiyo. Life sentence and death penalty Protests have been held worldwide in support of the Ugandan LGBTI community as it faces attack. The Anti-Homosexuality Act introduces “the offence of homosexuality”, with a potential life sentence for a same-sex “sexual act”. It also allows the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”, including sex acts with children, disabled people or those drugged against their will, or committed by people living with HIV – actions that are already criminalised by other laws. Since the Act was passed last May, the World Bank has suspended new loans to Uganda and the US President’s Emergency Plan to Fight AIDS (Pepfar) has declined to advance plans for the country. There has also been widespread condemnation of the law. Buteera claimed that the Act had been passed “against the backdrop of the recruitment of children into the practice of homosexuality. That is the mischief that Section 11 [dealing with the “promotion of homosexuality”] of the Act seeks to address.” ‘Absence of global consensus’ on LGBTQ rights The court presented seven points as the basis for its decision, including that “sister jurisdictions” have “decriminalised consensual homosexuality between adults in private space”. However, it referred to the absence of global consensus “regarding non-discrimination based sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC)”. “This is reflected in the fact that to date non-discrimination on the basis of the SOGIESC variables has not explicitly found its way into international human rights treaties. Instead, it has been ‘vetoed’ by a bloc of resistant (UN) member states that has prevented the adoption of a binding declaration or similar instrument to strengthen protections for LGBTI human rights,” according to the court. The court also referred to conflicts between “a universal understanding of human rights and respecting the diversity and freedom of human cultures” and between “individuals’ right to self-determination, self-perception and bodily autonomy, on the one hand; and the communal or societal right to social, political and cultural self-determination” on the other. Finally, it described the Anti-Homosexuality Act as “a reflection of the socio-cultural realities of the Ugandan society, and was passed by an overwhelming majority of the democratically elected representatives of the Ugandan citizens”. Win for government Dr Adrian Jjuukho, Ugandan human rights lawyer and executive director of Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF), which was one of the petitioners against the Act, described the ruling as “only intended to please donors in the health sector so that they can continue to provide the funds that are much needed while sacrificing LGBTI persons in the process”. “The Court has nullified provisions that directly impede health service provision including reporting obligations, and where the victim acquires a terminal illness. This clears the way for health funding but does not actually clear the way for proper service provision,” said Jjuukho, writing on X (Twitter). 1. The Constitutional Court just delivered what would be a win-win judgment – intended to please all parties. Unfortunately, this only pleases one party – the government, which will most likely get its World Bank and Global Fund money as the LGBT community continues to be muzzled — Dr. Adrian Jjuuko (@jjuukoa) April 3, 2024 In a guarded statement, UNAIDS Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa Anne Githuku-Shongwe, said that “evidence shows that criminalizing populations most at risk of HIV, such as the LGBTQ+ communities, obstructs access to life-saving health and HIV services, which undermines public health and the overall HIV response in the country.” “To achieve the goal of ending the AIDS pandemic by 2030, it is vital to ensure that everyone has equal access to health services without fear,” she added. UNAIDS provided evidence in support of the petitioners on certain clauses via an amicus brief. Meanwhile, Ugandan feminist lawyer Sunshine Fionah Komusana told Health Policy Watch that “the ruling impacts everyone”. “With the kind of government we have, I don’t know how anyone would be celebrating, knowing very well the different tags they use to deny people freedom of expression and association.,” said Komusana. “Anti-human rights groups are gaining ground and before we know it, these kinds of legislation will be feeding into retraction of several other rights. See examples of reintroduction of legislation to legalise female genital mutilation and child marriages in some countries. These legislations harm all of us.” Uganda’s laws were robust enough to address paedophilia, and they already criminalised LGBTQIA+ people; this new law will affect you, political opponent candidates and your children. It is far-reaching and ambiguous. Anyone can be guilty. #ResistAHA23 pic.twitter.com/trWllorXf6 — Uganda Feminist Forum (UFF) (@UgFeministForum) June 29, 2023 Hundreds of people have already been arrested and attacked since the Act was introduced last May. In one case, a man was attacked in his home by a group of men one night. He was beaten and some of his property burnt by the mob, which accused him of being a homosexual. In a similar incident, a lesbian was attacked by two men in her home. She had been evicted by her landlord on the grounds of homosexuality but did not have the resources to move. International reaction to the court’s ruling will no doubt be keenly watched by countries contemplating their own anti-LGBTQ laws, such as Ghana, Kenya, South Sudan and Tanzania. In February, Ghana’s Parliament unanimously passed one of the world’s most draconian anti-LGBTIQ Bills which includes a mandatory three-year prison sentence for a person who simply “identifies” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or queer”. However, the president has yet to sign it into law. Image Credits: Alisdare Hickson/Flickr. Continued Mpox Outbreak Leads US to Re-examine Smallpox Readiness 03/04/2024 Sophia Samantaroy Although smallpox has been eradicated, it is possib;le to recreate it from published genomes. In the wake of surging mpox cases in the DRC and the emergence of novel orthopoxviruses, the US needs to rapidly bolster its smallpox readiness, preparedness, and response, according to a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report brought together experts from across the country to critically evaluate the state of smallpox vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics, known as medical countermeasures (MCMs), in the event of an outbreak. Improving MCMs is crucial for enhancing the nation’s ability to combat a smallpox outbreak or deliberate attack, the report emphasizes. It also stresses the importance of fortifying public health and healthcare systems to swiftly and effectively respond, including mechanisms for rapid vaccine distribution. An ‘evolving bio-threat and technology landscape’ With advancements in genome sequencing and editing technology, it is now possible to recreate live smallpox virus from published genomes, the report warns. US population changes and advancements in gene editing and synthesis technologies have drastically altered the potential for a smallpox outbreak or attack in recent years. But these technologies significantly raise the risk of accidental or intentional release, challenging readiness planning and potentially altering the epidemiology and clinical presentations of the disease. The report notes that even if all existing collections of the virus were destroyed, reemergence is still a threat. Despite the risks, the report underscores the necessity of continued research involving live variola virus for developing and enhancing smallpox MCMs. This research is essential for creating more effective therapies, validating vaccine and treatment efficacy, and establishing animal models for research purposes. Research using these viruses can also fill gaps in our fundamental understanding of orthopoxvirus biology, ecology, evolution, transmission, and disease onset in humans. A call for MCM research and development Three main categories of MCMs need improvement: diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics. More accurate diagnostic tests to detect smallpox and related viruses at earlier stages is paramount. Vaccine safety is also an issue, and the report calls for research into vaccines that can be used across different populations and that are available as a single dose. “Developing new smallpox vaccines that use a multi-vaccine platform – which use common vaccine vectors, manufacturing ingredients, and processes – would improve the capacity for rapid production and reduce the need for stockpiling.” Lastly, the report advocates for safer and more diversified therapeutics, such as antivirals with different and diverse targets, mechanisms, and routes of administration, to supplement existing antivirals. Vulnerabilities: too few manufacturers The smallpox vaccine protects against mpox. The report concluded that the small number of manufacturers capable of producing smallpox medical countermeasures is a specific vulnerability, and that there is currently insufficient capacity to scale production in the event of a large outbreak or attack. Logistics and supply chain management planning is critical, as is planning for regulatory responsiveness. Clinical and public health guidance also needs to be updated to reflect new data and medical countermeasures so that health care providers and others on the front line of public health have the capability and capacity to respond to smallpox. The need for global cooperation Both the COVID-19 pandemic and mpox outbreaks revealed gaps in the US’s ability to respond to new infectious diseases. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the ability of US public health and health care systems to adapt and respond to an unfamiliar pathogen. Mpox, on the other hand, showed the challenges of rapidly making diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics available at scale. Furthermore, the mpox outbreak brought to light the lack of diverse smallpox therapeutics options. Currently, standard research methods rely on challenge studies in animals to understand MCM efficacy in humans, leading to issues with accurately understanding the safety and efficacy in humans. “The gaps in our ability to respond to a new infectious disease were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent mpox outbreak,” said committee chair Prof Larry Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law and professor of medicine at Georgetown University. “It is vital to prioritize research into the development of safer and more effective smallpox diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, make judicious choices in stockpiling, and have modern, well-practiced, and adaptable plans for responding in the event of a smallpox outbreak,” added Gostin, who is also director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Research and development for these MCMs needs to not only consider the actual device or product, but also the ability to “deploy at scale” and equitably to meet the challenges of public acceptance. The report urges effective risk communication for vaccines, as the same challenges with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation could occur in a smallpox outbreak. While the report primarily focused on US readiness and response capabilities, it does note the impact of growing global interdependence in detecting and containing potential smallpox outbreaks. “The COVID-19 pandemic and pox multi-country outbreak, both declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) by WHO, underscore the need for further domestic global coordination for preparedness and response against novel pathogens including orthopoxvirus events,” note the report authors. This means preemptively supporting international MCM capacity as any US response will be “significantly affected” by the ability of other countries to detect and surveil. The report notes that global solidarity is a key component to rapidly identify, contain, respond, and ensure equitable MCM allocation in a smallpox event. Preparedness for similar viruses Smallpox-related viruses such as mpox, Alaskapox, and cowpox are increasingly found in humans, magnifying the need for medical countermeasures that can detect, treat, and prevent these diseases. The report notes that most mpox therapeutics were developed because of investments in smallpox therapeutics. “Direct investment in developing therapeutics targeting circulating orthopoxviruses could similarly benefit smallpox therapeutic preparedness and would likely have more immediate utility and potentially achieve commercial viability.” Image Credits: Isao Arita/ WHO. Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
In Wake of Food Aid Workers’ Deaths, WHO Demands Stronger ‘Deconfliction’ Mechanism for Gaza Relief Missions 03/04/2024 Elaine Ruth Fletcher WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO’s Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Wednesday decried the deaths of seven aid workers by Israeli fire while delivering food aid to Palestinians in besieged northern Gaza, demanding a major revamp of “deconfliction” procedures so that aid missions could proceed safely and predictably. “WHO is horrified by the killing of 7 humanitarian workers from World Central Kitchen in Gaza on Monday. The work they were doing was saving lives, providing food to thousands of starving people,” said the director general at a press briefing. Responding to a blast of international criticism, Israel’s top military and political leadership expressed deep regret for the incident in which air force drones deliberately picked off, one by one, three cars carrying the seven aid workers affiliated with an organisation widely recognised even by Israelis as a neutral partner. The country pledged a high-level investigation of the incident. But Tedros said that the incident reflects systemic problems faced by virtually every agency mission WHO has conducted in Gaza in coordinating missions with Israel’s military through areas of Gaza that it now controls. Those problems are also putting its aid workers at risk almost daily from combat fire, as well as taking the lives of other innocent people in the past six months of war, Tedros and other senior WHO officials said. “The DG rightly highlights why we are all appalled by the killings of our colleagues, in clearly marked vehicles in a deconflicted area. It clearly shows that the deconfliction mechanism is not working,” said Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). “What is needed is an effective, transparent and workable deconfliction and notification mechanism. The UN has to be assured that convoys and facilities are not targeted. It means that assuring movement of aid in Gaza, including through checkpoints, is predictable, expedited, etc. That roads are operational and cleared.” Fraught with cancellations, delays and uncertainties Dr Richard Peeperkorn, head of WHO’s Jerusalem-based office for the Occupied Palestinian Territories. In particular, WHO relief missions to northern Gaza, which Israel nominally controls although heavy pockets of fighting with Hamas continue – have been fraught with cancellations, delays and other uncertainties for months, Peeperkorn complained. “We see too many missions delayed or denied. It’s also making the missions which are delayed, and I’ve been on quite a few myself, more arduous and dangerous. You sometimes return at 11 o’clock at night, or past midnight. So it becomes unnecessarily dangerous.” “Even today, who my team was in an mission to the north, again, to deliver a few medical supplies, food and water, to Al-Ahli Hospital and Al-Sahabah Hospital in the north… They were, as was planned and agreed on, between 6 and 7 a.m. ready to go,” he recounted. “They went to the checkpoint, and just before the checkpoint, they’ve been waiting and waiting and waiting up till now. Now they had to return back to their to their guest houses.” Not an isolated incident Shell of WCK car that came under drone attack, with the NGOs identity clearly marked on its roof Along with the blast of international criticism, the WCK attack has been deplored widely inside Israel, where the organisation has been praised for having also delivered food aid to Israelis displaced by the Hamas attacks on Jewish communities around the perimeter of Gaza on 7 October. While the Israeli army has sought to portray the killings as a tragic, but isolated incident, critics say it reflects more systemic problems related not only to poor coordination of aid, but an expanding culture of “shoot first ask questions later.” Peeperkorn underlined that the attack also wasn’t an isolated incident for UN and WHO operations. “We shouldn’t forget that already in December, January, we have seen, unfortunately, attacks and sometimes the shooting at the UN vehicles,” he said. This included a mission to the north in which he participated in early December, he recalled. “There was an airstrike 150 meters from our car. The truck delivering medical supplies was shot at, the PRCS (Palestinian Red Crescent Society) people were shot at. And PRCS staff were actually arrested and detained for a while.” Painstaking detail for every mission prepared Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, in southern Gaza. Each WHO convoy to southern Gaza, and northward, requires painstaking preparation. Detailed planning is required for every mission WHO or its partners prepare. For WHO missions, not only international and local health workers, but also a security officer and an ordnance expert are typically included in the team as well. “It’s an enormous amount of work, and every mission that gets delayed, impeded or denied, that other missions cannot take place,” Peeperkorn said. “All of those details – the timing, the people on the missions, are shared through Israeli counterparts, and then there is agreement that the mission can take place at this hour,” he stressed. “You want to start this as early as possible. For some of the food transport, it’s even better to do that at night, before sunrise. But in the case of medical supplies, food or fuel for patients, we normally start a mission around 5 or 6 in the morning. …. Because there will always be delays, and you want to be back in daylight. A team sets out on the road only after it has received an OK from the Israeli army. “Then, normally, there’s a holding point at military checkpoints, where you have to wait again,” Peeperkorn said. “Most of the missions, there were always problems. Delays, delays, delays – and often denials in the end,” he said. “And the mission today was a good example – to bring a few medical supplies, food and water to those two hospitals in the north. “It was all agreed, they would leave at 6:30 to 7 am. First of all they don’t get a green light to go. And finally, they get a green light to go to the checkpoint…. “And then they waited before the checkpoint. And they wait and they wait and they wait. In the meantime, very little discussion. Nothing is going on. “They realize that even if they get a green light now, they can’t go to Al Sahaba anymore. They would only deliver supplies to Al Ahli hospital and then go back.” Eventually, after more waiting, they realise that “they will never be able to return [in time], and they have to cancel the mission.” Workable deconfliction “So what is a workable deconfliction mechanism?” Peeperkorn asked. “That routes are coordinated. That it’s a predictable mechanism. That the roads are going to be clear. And anyone who knows Gaza, know that there are a number of roads, which can be easily cleared and made operational. “So in a way, it’s a simple mechanism, and somehow, it has never properly worked.” Given the mass hunger that northern Gaza faces, followed by the near total destruction of Al Shifa Hospital, the area’s main health facility, over the past two weeks, those missions are needed now more than ever, Peeperkorn stressed. “There should be 50 missions going to the north every day. Multiple [missions] of food, water, shelter, and maybe one medical mission. That should be happening everywhere, including in the south,” said Peeperkorn. “And even if there’s active conflict going on, then you expect that humanitarian corridors are created, where the UN partners can safely deliver their aid and do their job. And clearly the horrific attack on WCK is clearly a sign that this is not working. “So I really do expect, whatever comes out now, that we get a functional deconfliction mechanism and a proper notification system and that the UN and partners can do their work.” Image Credits: AFP/TImes of Israel, WHO/EMRO. Health As a Driver of Innovation Not Just a Recipient 03/04/2024 Hans Henri P. Kluge An electronic blood sugar monitor makes it easier for people with diabetes to manage their disease. As WHO unveils S.A.R.A.H. (Smart AI Resource Assistant for Health), its new digital health promoter prototype powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI), and available in eight languages 24 hours a day, WHO’s Regional Director for Europe writes about harnessing innovation in health to help meet critical public health challenges, both now and in the future. Innovation has always been a driving force behind advancements in health, revolutionizing the way we prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases. And as we navigate through a rapidly evolving health landscape, embracing health innovation has become more crucial than ever. From cutting-edge technologies like mRNA vaccines to AI-driven diagnostics, the potential of innovation to transform healthcare is limitless. But for too long health has often been viewed as a passive beneficiary of innovation rather than a driver of it. It’s time to change this mentality and harness the power of innovation. The challenges we face, from global pandemics to rising chronic diseases, from a rapidly ageing population to the effects of climate change, demand creative solutions that prioritize the well-being of populations worldwide. Shifting mindsets to move health innovation needle Our sector – health – can and should be at the cutting edge of new and innovative solutions, driven by technology including AI, which is going to fundamentally change every aspect of human life over the coming century. In fact, the IMF predicts that 40% of jobs will be affected by AI in some shape or form over the coming years, including in health and care. Further, AI products and services are expected to contribute $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, more than the current output of China and India combined. However, while technological advancements have made significant strides in healthcare, social innovations and policies also play a crucial role in addressing the complex needs of diverse communities. Innovation in public health goes beyond technological breakthroughs; it involves harnessing creativity, collaboration, and sustainability, to promote equitable access to quality healthcare. To foster an environment conducive to innovation in public health, leaders and decision-makers must focus on responding to the needs of communities while closing the equity gap. We must shift the focus from solely economic returns to the broader public health impact of innovative solutions. By aligning policies with the goal of improving health outcomes for all, we can better address inequalities in healthcare access and deliver sustainable solutions that benefit society as a whole. Another strategic shift requires patients themselves to be co-creators and designers of innovation because patients are experts in their own right. They know how to navigate life living with cancer or diabetes or a physical/mental disability. Involving them in the full pathway of disease management will make solutions more relevant and sustainable, and encourage innovation at scale. Ecosystem approach As public health professionals, we are not always good at articulating how innovation meets health and societal needs. That’s why we need an ecosystem approach to innovation. By fostering collaborations between healthcare providers, technology companies, research institutions, and policymakers, a holistic ecosystem can be created to drive innovation in health. In Ireland, for example, the Health Ministry joined forces with the Department for Business, Enterprise, and Innovation to set up the Health Innovation Hub, an incubator for public health solutions. Health workers in the Health Innovation Hub spend half their time delivering care and the other half working with start-ups and health tech companies: a clear example of an ecosystem approach. Digital solutions to health, such as telemedicine, are already a reality in some countries. As we embrace innovation to tackle pressing global challenges, sustainability must remain at the core of our efforts. Innovations should not only address current needs but also contribute to long-term social, economic, and environmental sustainability. This requires a shift towards sustainable practices, circular economy models, and responsible innovation that minimizes negative impacts on both people and planet. Too often people tell me that striving for health equity is at odds with our market-driven societies; that equity somehow stifles innovation. I would strongly dispute that – there is no contradiction. But unfortunately, modern economics tends to focus only on improving efficiency – for example, getting more cancer screenings for the dollar, or squeezing the last ounce of productivity out of the health system. Equity – leaving no one behind – is not seen as the responsibility of the commercial sector but that of the state or the non-profit sector. This mindset also needs to change. A Wellbeing Economy values equity and not only revenue or “productivity”. It strives to make the world a safe and just place for humanity – and this is the true challenge for innovators. The future is already here Innovation for health brings together experts from diverse fields such as medicine, engineering, data science, and behavioural psychology. But as health is about where people live, love, work, and play, it’s also about transportation, urban planning, and agriculture. This interdisciplinary approach not only catalyses breakthrough discoveries but also nurtures a culture of cross-pollination, where ideas flourish, and boundaries are transcended – precisely the kind of culture that innovation needs to thrive. However, the pursuit of innovation for health is not without its hurdles. From regulatory barriers to financial constraints, from ethical dilemmas to data privacy concerns, the path to innovation is fraught with challenges that require careful navigation. Nevertheless, these challenges should not deter us but rather galvanize our resolve to push the boundaries of what is possible. By fostering a culture of innovation, nurturing creative minds, and empowering diverse stakeholders to collaborate, we can address the most pressing challenges of our time. Embracing emerging technologies, exploring new frontiers in science and medicine, and prioritizing social innovations will pave the way for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future and help countries in the hard-pressed challenge of reaching the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. We are well and truly in an era of ever accelerating innovation in health, bringing with it boundless possibilities for improving our collective health and wellbeing, generating jobs, and growing our economies. But health leaders are not yet fully equipped to navigate this new world, so full of exciting potential, with confidence. The health sector must be ready and equipped to embrace innovation across all dimensions, strengthening health and wellbeing. Or run the risk of being left behind, squandering the opportunities of today and jeopardizing the very future of health itself. The choice is clear. Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge is WHO Regional Director for Europe Innovation ecosystem for public health Digital health – WHO/Europe AI ethics and governance guidance Image Credits: Uka Borrgeaard/ WHO, Juliana Tan/ WHO, WHO. Uganda’s Constitutional Court Greenlights Draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 03/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Uganda’s Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera (centre) delivers the Constitutional Court ruling. Uganda’s Constitutional Court ruled on Wednesday that the country’s draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 complies with the country’s Constitution in all but four aspects. “We decline to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety neither would we grant a permanent injunction against its enforcement,” Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera, told the Kampala courtroom and a capacity Zoom audience of 500. The four sections that were struck down by the five-judge panel – 3 (2c), 9, 11 (2d) and 14 – were “inconsistent with right to health, privacy and freedom of religion”, according to the court. UPDATE: The Constitutional Court has declined to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety.#NTVNews#AntiHomosexualAct pic.twitter.com/nQGIoe3sUA — NTV UGANDA (@ntvuganda) April 3, 2024 “The nullified sections had criminalised the letting of premises for use for homosexual purposes, the failure by anyone to report acts of homosexuality to the police for appropriate action, and the engagement in acts of homosexuality by anyone which results into the other persons contracting a terminal illness,” according to a statement from the court. Buteera said that the mandatory reporting to authorities of people suspected of having committed homosexual offences violated individual rights. While the court has struck down the possibility of landlords being imprisoned for renting premises to homosexuals, it has maintained that prison terms of up to 20 years for journalists “promoting homosexuality” were legitimate. In delivering the unanimous judgement, Buteera said that constraints on the media aligned with sections of the country’s Communications Act and Anti-Pornography Act, which “aim to uphold societal morals by limiting the use of media to publish or broadcast offensive material”. The Act’s legitimacy was contested by 22 Ugandan human rights advocates including Member of Parliament Fox Oywelowo Odoi (the only MP to vote against the Act), legal academics Prof. Sylvia Tamale and Rutaro Robert and Bishop James Lubega Banda. They said that it violated various constitutional rights, including the right to privacy and freedom from discrimination, as well as going against Uganda’s international human rights commitments. Frank Mugisha, of Sexual Minorities Uganda and Convening for Equality co-convener, described the ruling as “wrong and deplorable”, and called on “all governments, UN partners, and multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the Global Fund to likewise intensify their demand that this law be struck down”. “This ruling should result in further restrictions to funding for Uganda – no donor should be funding anti-LGBTQ+ hate and human rights violations,” said Mugisha, one of Uganda’s most prominent LGBTQ activists. Nicholas Opiyo of human rights group Chapter Four Uganda, said his organisation “vehemently disagrees” with the court’s finding and the basis on which it was reached. “We approached the court expecting it to apply the law in defence of human rights and not rely on public sentiments, and vague cultural values arguments,” said Opiyo. Life sentence and death penalty Protests have been held worldwide in support of the Ugandan LGBTI community as it faces attack. The Anti-Homosexuality Act introduces “the offence of homosexuality”, with a potential life sentence for a same-sex “sexual act”. It also allows the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”, including sex acts with children, disabled people or those drugged against their will, or committed by people living with HIV – actions that are already criminalised by other laws. Since the Act was passed last May, the World Bank has suspended new loans to Uganda and the US President’s Emergency Plan to Fight AIDS (Pepfar) has declined to advance plans for the country. There has also been widespread condemnation of the law. Buteera claimed that the Act had been passed “against the backdrop of the recruitment of children into the practice of homosexuality. That is the mischief that Section 11 [dealing with the “promotion of homosexuality”] of the Act seeks to address.” ‘Absence of global consensus’ on LGBTQ rights The court presented seven points as the basis for its decision, including that “sister jurisdictions” have “decriminalised consensual homosexuality between adults in private space”. However, it referred to the absence of global consensus “regarding non-discrimination based sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC)”. “This is reflected in the fact that to date non-discrimination on the basis of the SOGIESC variables has not explicitly found its way into international human rights treaties. Instead, it has been ‘vetoed’ by a bloc of resistant (UN) member states that has prevented the adoption of a binding declaration or similar instrument to strengthen protections for LGBTI human rights,” according to the court. The court also referred to conflicts between “a universal understanding of human rights and respecting the diversity and freedom of human cultures” and between “individuals’ right to self-determination, self-perception and bodily autonomy, on the one hand; and the communal or societal right to social, political and cultural self-determination” on the other. Finally, it described the Anti-Homosexuality Act as “a reflection of the socio-cultural realities of the Ugandan society, and was passed by an overwhelming majority of the democratically elected representatives of the Ugandan citizens”. Win for government Dr Adrian Jjuukho, Ugandan human rights lawyer and executive director of Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF), which was one of the petitioners against the Act, described the ruling as “only intended to please donors in the health sector so that they can continue to provide the funds that are much needed while sacrificing LGBTI persons in the process”. “The Court has nullified provisions that directly impede health service provision including reporting obligations, and where the victim acquires a terminal illness. This clears the way for health funding but does not actually clear the way for proper service provision,” said Jjuukho, writing on X (Twitter). 1. The Constitutional Court just delivered what would be a win-win judgment – intended to please all parties. Unfortunately, this only pleases one party – the government, which will most likely get its World Bank and Global Fund money as the LGBT community continues to be muzzled — Dr. Adrian Jjuuko (@jjuukoa) April 3, 2024 In a guarded statement, UNAIDS Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa Anne Githuku-Shongwe, said that “evidence shows that criminalizing populations most at risk of HIV, such as the LGBTQ+ communities, obstructs access to life-saving health and HIV services, which undermines public health and the overall HIV response in the country.” “To achieve the goal of ending the AIDS pandemic by 2030, it is vital to ensure that everyone has equal access to health services without fear,” she added. UNAIDS provided evidence in support of the petitioners on certain clauses via an amicus brief. Meanwhile, Ugandan feminist lawyer Sunshine Fionah Komusana told Health Policy Watch that “the ruling impacts everyone”. “With the kind of government we have, I don’t know how anyone would be celebrating, knowing very well the different tags they use to deny people freedom of expression and association.,” said Komusana. “Anti-human rights groups are gaining ground and before we know it, these kinds of legislation will be feeding into retraction of several other rights. See examples of reintroduction of legislation to legalise female genital mutilation and child marriages in some countries. These legislations harm all of us.” Uganda’s laws were robust enough to address paedophilia, and they already criminalised LGBTQIA+ people; this new law will affect you, political opponent candidates and your children. It is far-reaching and ambiguous. Anyone can be guilty. #ResistAHA23 pic.twitter.com/trWllorXf6 — Uganda Feminist Forum (UFF) (@UgFeministForum) June 29, 2023 Hundreds of people have already been arrested and attacked since the Act was introduced last May. In one case, a man was attacked in his home by a group of men one night. He was beaten and some of his property burnt by the mob, which accused him of being a homosexual. In a similar incident, a lesbian was attacked by two men in her home. She had been evicted by her landlord on the grounds of homosexuality but did not have the resources to move. International reaction to the court’s ruling will no doubt be keenly watched by countries contemplating their own anti-LGBTQ laws, such as Ghana, Kenya, South Sudan and Tanzania. In February, Ghana’s Parliament unanimously passed one of the world’s most draconian anti-LGBTIQ Bills which includes a mandatory three-year prison sentence for a person who simply “identifies” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or queer”. However, the president has yet to sign it into law. Image Credits: Alisdare Hickson/Flickr. Continued Mpox Outbreak Leads US to Re-examine Smallpox Readiness 03/04/2024 Sophia Samantaroy Although smallpox has been eradicated, it is possib;le to recreate it from published genomes. In the wake of surging mpox cases in the DRC and the emergence of novel orthopoxviruses, the US needs to rapidly bolster its smallpox readiness, preparedness, and response, according to a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report brought together experts from across the country to critically evaluate the state of smallpox vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics, known as medical countermeasures (MCMs), in the event of an outbreak. Improving MCMs is crucial for enhancing the nation’s ability to combat a smallpox outbreak or deliberate attack, the report emphasizes. It also stresses the importance of fortifying public health and healthcare systems to swiftly and effectively respond, including mechanisms for rapid vaccine distribution. An ‘evolving bio-threat and technology landscape’ With advancements in genome sequencing and editing technology, it is now possible to recreate live smallpox virus from published genomes, the report warns. US population changes and advancements in gene editing and synthesis technologies have drastically altered the potential for a smallpox outbreak or attack in recent years. But these technologies significantly raise the risk of accidental or intentional release, challenging readiness planning and potentially altering the epidemiology and clinical presentations of the disease. The report notes that even if all existing collections of the virus were destroyed, reemergence is still a threat. Despite the risks, the report underscores the necessity of continued research involving live variola virus for developing and enhancing smallpox MCMs. This research is essential for creating more effective therapies, validating vaccine and treatment efficacy, and establishing animal models for research purposes. Research using these viruses can also fill gaps in our fundamental understanding of orthopoxvirus biology, ecology, evolution, transmission, and disease onset in humans. A call for MCM research and development Three main categories of MCMs need improvement: diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics. More accurate diagnostic tests to detect smallpox and related viruses at earlier stages is paramount. Vaccine safety is also an issue, and the report calls for research into vaccines that can be used across different populations and that are available as a single dose. “Developing new smallpox vaccines that use a multi-vaccine platform – which use common vaccine vectors, manufacturing ingredients, and processes – would improve the capacity for rapid production and reduce the need for stockpiling.” Lastly, the report advocates for safer and more diversified therapeutics, such as antivirals with different and diverse targets, mechanisms, and routes of administration, to supplement existing antivirals. Vulnerabilities: too few manufacturers The smallpox vaccine protects against mpox. The report concluded that the small number of manufacturers capable of producing smallpox medical countermeasures is a specific vulnerability, and that there is currently insufficient capacity to scale production in the event of a large outbreak or attack. Logistics and supply chain management planning is critical, as is planning for regulatory responsiveness. Clinical and public health guidance also needs to be updated to reflect new data and medical countermeasures so that health care providers and others on the front line of public health have the capability and capacity to respond to smallpox. The need for global cooperation Both the COVID-19 pandemic and mpox outbreaks revealed gaps in the US’s ability to respond to new infectious diseases. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the ability of US public health and health care systems to adapt and respond to an unfamiliar pathogen. Mpox, on the other hand, showed the challenges of rapidly making diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics available at scale. Furthermore, the mpox outbreak brought to light the lack of diverse smallpox therapeutics options. Currently, standard research methods rely on challenge studies in animals to understand MCM efficacy in humans, leading to issues with accurately understanding the safety and efficacy in humans. “The gaps in our ability to respond to a new infectious disease were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent mpox outbreak,” said committee chair Prof Larry Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law and professor of medicine at Georgetown University. “It is vital to prioritize research into the development of safer and more effective smallpox diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, make judicious choices in stockpiling, and have modern, well-practiced, and adaptable plans for responding in the event of a smallpox outbreak,” added Gostin, who is also director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Research and development for these MCMs needs to not only consider the actual device or product, but also the ability to “deploy at scale” and equitably to meet the challenges of public acceptance. The report urges effective risk communication for vaccines, as the same challenges with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation could occur in a smallpox outbreak. While the report primarily focused on US readiness and response capabilities, it does note the impact of growing global interdependence in detecting and containing potential smallpox outbreaks. “The COVID-19 pandemic and pox multi-country outbreak, both declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) by WHO, underscore the need for further domestic global coordination for preparedness and response against novel pathogens including orthopoxvirus events,” note the report authors. This means preemptively supporting international MCM capacity as any US response will be “significantly affected” by the ability of other countries to detect and surveil. The report notes that global solidarity is a key component to rapidly identify, contain, respond, and ensure equitable MCM allocation in a smallpox event. Preparedness for similar viruses Smallpox-related viruses such as mpox, Alaskapox, and cowpox are increasingly found in humans, magnifying the need for medical countermeasures that can detect, treat, and prevent these diseases. The report notes that most mpox therapeutics were developed because of investments in smallpox therapeutics. “Direct investment in developing therapeutics targeting circulating orthopoxviruses could similarly benefit smallpox therapeutic preparedness and would likely have more immediate utility and potentially achieve commercial viability.” Image Credits: Isao Arita/ WHO. Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Health As a Driver of Innovation Not Just a Recipient 03/04/2024 Hans Henri P. Kluge An electronic blood sugar monitor makes it easier for people with diabetes to manage their disease. As WHO unveils S.A.R.A.H. (Smart AI Resource Assistant for Health), its new digital health promoter prototype powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI), and available in eight languages 24 hours a day, WHO’s Regional Director for Europe writes about harnessing innovation in health to help meet critical public health challenges, both now and in the future. Innovation has always been a driving force behind advancements in health, revolutionizing the way we prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases. And as we navigate through a rapidly evolving health landscape, embracing health innovation has become more crucial than ever. From cutting-edge technologies like mRNA vaccines to AI-driven diagnostics, the potential of innovation to transform healthcare is limitless. But for too long health has often been viewed as a passive beneficiary of innovation rather than a driver of it. It’s time to change this mentality and harness the power of innovation. The challenges we face, from global pandemics to rising chronic diseases, from a rapidly ageing population to the effects of climate change, demand creative solutions that prioritize the well-being of populations worldwide. Shifting mindsets to move health innovation needle Our sector – health – can and should be at the cutting edge of new and innovative solutions, driven by technology including AI, which is going to fundamentally change every aspect of human life over the coming century. In fact, the IMF predicts that 40% of jobs will be affected by AI in some shape or form over the coming years, including in health and care. Further, AI products and services are expected to contribute $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, more than the current output of China and India combined. However, while technological advancements have made significant strides in healthcare, social innovations and policies also play a crucial role in addressing the complex needs of diverse communities. Innovation in public health goes beyond technological breakthroughs; it involves harnessing creativity, collaboration, and sustainability, to promote equitable access to quality healthcare. To foster an environment conducive to innovation in public health, leaders and decision-makers must focus on responding to the needs of communities while closing the equity gap. We must shift the focus from solely economic returns to the broader public health impact of innovative solutions. By aligning policies with the goal of improving health outcomes for all, we can better address inequalities in healthcare access and deliver sustainable solutions that benefit society as a whole. Another strategic shift requires patients themselves to be co-creators and designers of innovation because patients are experts in their own right. They know how to navigate life living with cancer or diabetes or a physical/mental disability. Involving them in the full pathway of disease management will make solutions more relevant and sustainable, and encourage innovation at scale. Ecosystem approach As public health professionals, we are not always good at articulating how innovation meets health and societal needs. That’s why we need an ecosystem approach to innovation. By fostering collaborations between healthcare providers, technology companies, research institutions, and policymakers, a holistic ecosystem can be created to drive innovation in health. In Ireland, for example, the Health Ministry joined forces with the Department for Business, Enterprise, and Innovation to set up the Health Innovation Hub, an incubator for public health solutions. Health workers in the Health Innovation Hub spend half their time delivering care and the other half working with start-ups and health tech companies: a clear example of an ecosystem approach. Digital solutions to health, such as telemedicine, are already a reality in some countries. As we embrace innovation to tackle pressing global challenges, sustainability must remain at the core of our efforts. Innovations should not only address current needs but also contribute to long-term social, economic, and environmental sustainability. This requires a shift towards sustainable practices, circular economy models, and responsible innovation that minimizes negative impacts on both people and planet. Too often people tell me that striving for health equity is at odds with our market-driven societies; that equity somehow stifles innovation. I would strongly dispute that – there is no contradiction. But unfortunately, modern economics tends to focus only on improving efficiency – for example, getting more cancer screenings for the dollar, or squeezing the last ounce of productivity out of the health system. Equity – leaving no one behind – is not seen as the responsibility of the commercial sector but that of the state or the non-profit sector. This mindset also needs to change. A Wellbeing Economy values equity and not only revenue or “productivity”. It strives to make the world a safe and just place for humanity – and this is the true challenge for innovators. The future is already here Innovation for health brings together experts from diverse fields such as medicine, engineering, data science, and behavioural psychology. But as health is about where people live, love, work, and play, it’s also about transportation, urban planning, and agriculture. This interdisciplinary approach not only catalyses breakthrough discoveries but also nurtures a culture of cross-pollination, where ideas flourish, and boundaries are transcended – precisely the kind of culture that innovation needs to thrive. However, the pursuit of innovation for health is not without its hurdles. From regulatory barriers to financial constraints, from ethical dilemmas to data privacy concerns, the path to innovation is fraught with challenges that require careful navigation. Nevertheless, these challenges should not deter us but rather galvanize our resolve to push the boundaries of what is possible. By fostering a culture of innovation, nurturing creative minds, and empowering diverse stakeholders to collaborate, we can address the most pressing challenges of our time. Embracing emerging technologies, exploring new frontiers in science and medicine, and prioritizing social innovations will pave the way for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future and help countries in the hard-pressed challenge of reaching the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. We are well and truly in an era of ever accelerating innovation in health, bringing with it boundless possibilities for improving our collective health and wellbeing, generating jobs, and growing our economies. But health leaders are not yet fully equipped to navigate this new world, so full of exciting potential, with confidence. The health sector must be ready and equipped to embrace innovation across all dimensions, strengthening health and wellbeing. Or run the risk of being left behind, squandering the opportunities of today and jeopardizing the very future of health itself. The choice is clear. Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge is WHO Regional Director for Europe Innovation ecosystem for public health Digital health – WHO/Europe AI ethics and governance guidance Image Credits: Uka Borrgeaard/ WHO, Juliana Tan/ WHO, WHO. Uganda’s Constitutional Court Greenlights Draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 03/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Uganda’s Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera (centre) delivers the Constitutional Court ruling. Uganda’s Constitutional Court ruled on Wednesday that the country’s draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 complies with the country’s Constitution in all but four aspects. “We decline to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety neither would we grant a permanent injunction against its enforcement,” Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera, told the Kampala courtroom and a capacity Zoom audience of 500. The four sections that were struck down by the five-judge panel – 3 (2c), 9, 11 (2d) and 14 – were “inconsistent with right to health, privacy and freedom of religion”, according to the court. UPDATE: The Constitutional Court has declined to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety.#NTVNews#AntiHomosexualAct pic.twitter.com/nQGIoe3sUA — NTV UGANDA (@ntvuganda) April 3, 2024 “The nullified sections had criminalised the letting of premises for use for homosexual purposes, the failure by anyone to report acts of homosexuality to the police for appropriate action, and the engagement in acts of homosexuality by anyone which results into the other persons contracting a terminal illness,” according to a statement from the court. Buteera said that the mandatory reporting to authorities of people suspected of having committed homosexual offences violated individual rights. While the court has struck down the possibility of landlords being imprisoned for renting premises to homosexuals, it has maintained that prison terms of up to 20 years for journalists “promoting homosexuality” were legitimate. In delivering the unanimous judgement, Buteera said that constraints on the media aligned with sections of the country’s Communications Act and Anti-Pornography Act, which “aim to uphold societal morals by limiting the use of media to publish or broadcast offensive material”. The Act’s legitimacy was contested by 22 Ugandan human rights advocates including Member of Parliament Fox Oywelowo Odoi (the only MP to vote against the Act), legal academics Prof. Sylvia Tamale and Rutaro Robert and Bishop James Lubega Banda. They said that it violated various constitutional rights, including the right to privacy and freedom from discrimination, as well as going against Uganda’s international human rights commitments. Frank Mugisha, of Sexual Minorities Uganda and Convening for Equality co-convener, described the ruling as “wrong and deplorable”, and called on “all governments, UN partners, and multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the Global Fund to likewise intensify their demand that this law be struck down”. “This ruling should result in further restrictions to funding for Uganda – no donor should be funding anti-LGBTQ+ hate and human rights violations,” said Mugisha, one of Uganda’s most prominent LGBTQ activists. Nicholas Opiyo of human rights group Chapter Four Uganda, said his organisation “vehemently disagrees” with the court’s finding and the basis on which it was reached. “We approached the court expecting it to apply the law in defence of human rights and not rely on public sentiments, and vague cultural values arguments,” said Opiyo. Life sentence and death penalty Protests have been held worldwide in support of the Ugandan LGBTI community as it faces attack. The Anti-Homosexuality Act introduces “the offence of homosexuality”, with a potential life sentence for a same-sex “sexual act”. It also allows the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”, including sex acts with children, disabled people or those drugged against their will, or committed by people living with HIV – actions that are already criminalised by other laws. Since the Act was passed last May, the World Bank has suspended new loans to Uganda and the US President’s Emergency Plan to Fight AIDS (Pepfar) has declined to advance plans for the country. There has also been widespread condemnation of the law. Buteera claimed that the Act had been passed “against the backdrop of the recruitment of children into the practice of homosexuality. That is the mischief that Section 11 [dealing with the “promotion of homosexuality”] of the Act seeks to address.” ‘Absence of global consensus’ on LGBTQ rights The court presented seven points as the basis for its decision, including that “sister jurisdictions” have “decriminalised consensual homosexuality between adults in private space”. However, it referred to the absence of global consensus “regarding non-discrimination based sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC)”. “This is reflected in the fact that to date non-discrimination on the basis of the SOGIESC variables has not explicitly found its way into international human rights treaties. Instead, it has been ‘vetoed’ by a bloc of resistant (UN) member states that has prevented the adoption of a binding declaration or similar instrument to strengthen protections for LGBTI human rights,” according to the court. The court also referred to conflicts between “a universal understanding of human rights and respecting the diversity and freedom of human cultures” and between “individuals’ right to self-determination, self-perception and bodily autonomy, on the one hand; and the communal or societal right to social, political and cultural self-determination” on the other. Finally, it described the Anti-Homosexuality Act as “a reflection of the socio-cultural realities of the Ugandan society, and was passed by an overwhelming majority of the democratically elected representatives of the Ugandan citizens”. Win for government Dr Adrian Jjuukho, Ugandan human rights lawyer and executive director of Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF), which was one of the petitioners against the Act, described the ruling as “only intended to please donors in the health sector so that they can continue to provide the funds that are much needed while sacrificing LGBTI persons in the process”. “The Court has nullified provisions that directly impede health service provision including reporting obligations, and where the victim acquires a terminal illness. This clears the way for health funding but does not actually clear the way for proper service provision,” said Jjuukho, writing on X (Twitter). 1. The Constitutional Court just delivered what would be a win-win judgment – intended to please all parties. Unfortunately, this only pleases one party – the government, which will most likely get its World Bank and Global Fund money as the LGBT community continues to be muzzled — Dr. Adrian Jjuuko (@jjuukoa) April 3, 2024 In a guarded statement, UNAIDS Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa Anne Githuku-Shongwe, said that “evidence shows that criminalizing populations most at risk of HIV, such as the LGBTQ+ communities, obstructs access to life-saving health and HIV services, which undermines public health and the overall HIV response in the country.” “To achieve the goal of ending the AIDS pandemic by 2030, it is vital to ensure that everyone has equal access to health services without fear,” she added. UNAIDS provided evidence in support of the petitioners on certain clauses via an amicus brief. Meanwhile, Ugandan feminist lawyer Sunshine Fionah Komusana told Health Policy Watch that “the ruling impacts everyone”. “With the kind of government we have, I don’t know how anyone would be celebrating, knowing very well the different tags they use to deny people freedom of expression and association.,” said Komusana. “Anti-human rights groups are gaining ground and before we know it, these kinds of legislation will be feeding into retraction of several other rights. See examples of reintroduction of legislation to legalise female genital mutilation and child marriages in some countries. These legislations harm all of us.” Uganda’s laws were robust enough to address paedophilia, and they already criminalised LGBTQIA+ people; this new law will affect you, political opponent candidates and your children. It is far-reaching and ambiguous. Anyone can be guilty. #ResistAHA23 pic.twitter.com/trWllorXf6 — Uganda Feminist Forum (UFF) (@UgFeministForum) June 29, 2023 Hundreds of people have already been arrested and attacked since the Act was introduced last May. In one case, a man was attacked in his home by a group of men one night. He was beaten and some of his property burnt by the mob, which accused him of being a homosexual. In a similar incident, a lesbian was attacked by two men in her home. She had been evicted by her landlord on the grounds of homosexuality but did not have the resources to move. International reaction to the court’s ruling will no doubt be keenly watched by countries contemplating their own anti-LGBTQ laws, such as Ghana, Kenya, South Sudan and Tanzania. In February, Ghana’s Parliament unanimously passed one of the world’s most draconian anti-LGBTIQ Bills which includes a mandatory three-year prison sentence for a person who simply “identifies” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or queer”. However, the president has yet to sign it into law. Image Credits: Alisdare Hickson/Flickr. Continued Mpox Outbreak Leads US to Re-examine Smallpox Readiness 03/04/2024 Sophia Samantaroy Although smallpox has been eradicated, it is possib;le to recreate it from published genomes. In the wake of surging mpox cases in the DRC and the emergence of novel orthopoxviruses, the US needs to rapidly bolster its smallpox readiness, preparedness, and response, according to a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report brought together experts from across the country to critically evaluate the state of smallpox vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics, known as medical countermeasures (MCMs), in the event of an outbreak. Improving MCMs is crucial for enhancing the nation’s ability to combat a smallpox outbreak or deliberate attack, the report emphasizes. It also stresses the importance of fortifying public health and healthcare systems to swiftly and effectively respond, including mechanisms for rapid vaccine distribution. An ‘evolving bio-threat and technology landscape’ With advancements in genome sequencing and editing technology, it is now possible to recreate live smallpox virus from published genomes, the report warns. US population changes and advancements in gene editing and synthesis technologies have drastically altered the potential for a smallpox outbreak or attack in recent years. But these technologies significantly raise the risk of accidental or intentional release, challenging readiness planning and potentially altering the epidemiology and clinical presentations of the disease. The report notes that even if all existing collections of the virus were destroyed, reemergence is still a threat. Despite the risks, the report underscores the necessity of continued research involving live variola virus for developing and enhancing smallpox MCMs. This research is essential for creating more effective therapies, validating vaccine and treatment efficacy, and establishing animal models for research purposes. Research using these viruses can also fill gaps in our fundamental understanding of orthopoxvirus biology, ecology, evolution, transmission, and disease onset in humans. A call for MCM research and development Three main categories of MCMs need improvement: diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics. More accurate diagnostic tests to detect smallpox and related viruses at earlier stages is paramount. Vaccine safety is also an issue, and the report calls for research into vaccines that can be used across different populations and that are available as a single dose. “Developing new smallpox vaccines that use a multi-vaccine platform – which use common vaccine vectors, manufacturing ingredients, and processes – would improve the capacity for rapid production and reduce the need for stockpiling.” Lastly, the report advocates for safer and more diversified therapeutics, such as antivirals with different and diverse targets, mechanisms, and routes of administration, to supplement existing antivirals. Vulnerabilities: too few manufacturers The smallpox vaccine protects against mpox. The report concluded that the small number of manufacturers capable of producing smallpox medical countermeasures is a specific vulnerability, and that there is currently insufficient capacity to scale production in the event of a large outbreak or attack. Logistics and supply chain management planning is critical, as is planning for regulatory responsiveness. Clinical and public health guidance also needs to be updated to reflect new data and medical countermeasures so that health care providers and others on the front line of public health have the capability and capacity to respond to smallpox. The need for global cooperation Both the COVID-19 pandemic and mpox outbreaks revealed gaps in the US’s ability to respond to new infectious diseases. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the ability of US public health and health care systems to adapt and respond to an unfamiliar pathogen. Mpox, on the other hand, showed the challenges of rapidly making diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics available at scale. Furthermore, the mpox outbreak brought to light the lack of diverse smallpox therapeutics options. Currently, standard research methods rely on challenge studies in animals to understand MCM efficacy in humans, leading to issues with accurately understanding the safety and efficacy in humans. “The gaps in our ability to respond to a new infectious disease were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent mpox outbreak,” said committee chair Prof Larry Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law and professor of medicine at Georgetown University. “It is vital to prioritize research into the development of safer and more effective smallpox diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, make judicious choices in stockpiling, and have modern, well-practiced, and adaptable plans for responding in the event of a smallpox outbreak,” added Gostin, who is also director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Research and development for these MCMs needs to not only consider the actual device or product, but also the ability to “deploy at scale” and equitably to meet the challenges of public acceptance. The report urges effective risk communication for vaccines, as the same challenges with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation could occur in a smallpox outbreak. While the report primarily focused on US readiness and response capabilities, it does note the impact of growing global interdependence in detecting and containing potential smallpox outbreaks. “The COVID-19 pandemic and pox multi-country outbreak, both declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) by WHO, underscore the need for further domestic global coordination for preparedness and response against novel pathogens including orthopoxvirus events,” note the report authors. This means preemptively supporting international MCM capacity as any US response will be “significantly affected” by the ability of other countries to detect and surveil. The report notes that global solidarity is a key component to rapidly identify, contain, respond, and ensure equitable MCM allocation in a smallpox event. Preparedness for similar viruses Smallpox-related viruses such as mpox, Alaskapox, and cowpox are increasingly found in humans, magnifying the need for medical countermeasures that can detect, treat, and prevent these diseases. The report notes that most mpox therapeutics were developed because of investments in smallpox therapeutics. “Direct investment in developing therapeutics targeting circulating orthopoxviruses could similarly benefit smallpox therapeutic preparedness and would likely have more immediate utility and potentially achieve commercial viability.” Image Credits: Isao Arita/ WHO. Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Uganda’s Constitutional Court Greenlights Draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 03/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Uganda’s Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera (centre) delivers the Constitutional Court ruling. Uganda’s Constitutional Court ruled on Wednesday that the country’s draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 complies with the country’s Constitution in all but four aspects. “We decline to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety neither would we grant a permanent injunction against its enforcement,” Deputy Chief Justice Richard Buteera, told the Kampala courtroom and a capacity Zoom audience of 500. The four sections that were struck down by the five-judge panel – 3 (2c), 9, 11 (2d) and 14 – were “inconsistent with right to health, privacy and freedom of religion”, according to the court. UPDATE: The Constitutional Court has declined to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety.#NTVNews#AntiHomosexualAct pic.twitter.com/nQGIoe3sUA — NTV UGANDA (@ntvuganda) April 3, 2024 “The nullified sections had criminalised the letting of premises for use for homosexual purposes, the failure by anyone to report acts of homosexuality to the police for appropriate action, and the engagement in acts of homosexuality by anyone which results into the other persons contracting a terminal illness,” according to a statement from the court. Buteera said that the mandatory reporting to authorities of people suspected of having committed homosexual offences violated individual rights. While the court has struck down the possibility of landlords being imprisoned for renting premises to homosexuals, it has maintained that prison terms of up to 20 years for journalists “promoting homosexuality” were legitimate. In delivering the unanimous judgement, Buteera said that constraints on the media aligned with sections of the country’s Communications Act and Anti-Pornography Act, which “aim to uphold societal morals by limiting the use of media to publish or broadcast offensive material”. The Act’s legitimacy was contested by 22 Ugandan human rights advocates including Member of Parliament Fox Oywelowo Odoi (the only MP to vote against the Act), legal academics Prof. Sylvia Tamale and Rutaro Robert and Bishop James Lubega Banda. They said that it violated various constitutional rights, including the right to privacy and freedom from discrimination, as well as going against Uganda’s international human rights commitments. Frank Mugisha, of Sexual Minorities Uganda and Convening for Equality co-convener, described the ruling as “wrong and deplorable”, and called on “all governments, UN partners, and multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the Global Fund to likewise intensify their demand that this law be struck down”. “This ruling should result in further restrictions to funding for Uganda – no donor should be funding anti-LGBTQ+ hate and human rights violations,” said Mugisha, one of Uganda’s most prominent LGBTQ activists. Nicholas Opiyo of human rights group Chapter Four Uganda, said his organisation “vehemently disagrees” with the court’s finding and the basis on which it was reached. “We approached the court expecting it to apply the law in defence of human rights and not rely on public sentiments, and vague cultural values arguments,” said Opiyo. Life sentence and death penalty Protests have been held worldwide in support of the Ugandan LGBTI community as it faces attack. The Anti-Homosexuality Act introduces “the offence of homosexuality”, with a potential life sentence for a same-sex “sexual act”. It also allows the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”, including sex acts with children, disabled people or those drugged against their will, or committed by people living with HIV – actions that are already criminalised by other laws. Since the Act was passed last May, the World Bank has suspended new loans to Uganda and the US President’s Emergency Plan to Fight AIDS (Pepfar) has declined to advance plans for the country. There has also been widespread condemnation of the law. Buteera claimed that the Act had been passed “against the backdrop of the recruitment of children into the practice of homosexuality. That is the mischief that Section 11 [dealing with the “promotion of homosexuality”] of the Act seeks to address.” ‘Absence of global consensus’ on LGBTQ rights The court presented seven points as the basis for its decision, including that “sister jurisdictions” have “decriminalised consensual homosexuality between adults in private space”. However, it referred to the absence of global consensus “regarding non-discrimination based sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC)”. “This is reflected in the fact that to date non-discrimination on the basis of the SOGIESC variables has not explicitly found its way into international human rights treaties. Instead, it has been ‘vetoed’ by a bloc of resistant (UN) member states that has prevented the adoption of a binding declaration or similar instrument to strengthen protections for LGBTI human rights,” according to the court. The court also referred to conflicts between “a universal understanding of human rights and respecting the diversity and freedom of human cultures” and between “individuals’ right to self-determination, self-perception and bodily autonomy, on the one hand; and the communal or societal right to social, political and cultural self-determination” on the other. Finally, it described the Anti-Homosexuality Act as “a reflection of the socio-cultural realities of the Ugandan society, and was passed by an overwhelming majority of the democratically elected representatives of the Ugandan citizens”. Win for government Dr Adrian Jjuukho, Ugandan human rights lawyer and executive director of Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF), which was one of the petitioners against the Act, described the ruling as “only intended to please donors in the health sector so that they can continue to provide the funds that are much needed while sacrificing LGBTI persons in the process”. “The Court has nullified provisions that directly impede health service provision including reporting obligations, and where the victim acquires a terminal illness. This clears the way for health funding but does not actually clear the way for proper service provision,” said Jjuukho, writing on X (Twitter). 1. The Constitutional Court just delivered what would be a win-win judgment – intended to please all parties. Unfortunately, this only pleases one party – the government, which will most likely get its World Bank and Global Fund money as the LGBT community continues to be muzzled — Dr. Adrian Jjuuko (@jjuukoa) April 3, 2024 In a guarded statement, UNAIDS Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa Anne Githuku-Shongwe, said that “evidence shows that criminalizing populations most at risk of HIV, such as the LGBTQ+ communities, obstructs access to life-saving health and HIV services, which undermines public health and the overall HIV response in the country.” “To achieve the goal of ending the AIDS pandemic by 2030, it is vital to ensure that everyone has equal access to health services without fear,” she added. UNAIDS provided evidence in support of the petitioners on certain clauses via an amicus brief. Meanwhile, Ugandan feminist lawyer Sunshine Fionah Komusana told Health Policy Watch that “the ruling impacts everyone”. “With the kind of government we have, I don’t know how anyone would be celebrating, knowing very well the different tags they use to deny people freedom of expression and association.,” said Komusana. “Anti-human rights groups are gaining ground and before we know it, these kinds of legislation will be feeding into retraction of several other rights. See examples of reintroduction of legislation to legalise female genital mutilation and child marriages in some countries. These legislations harm all of us.” Uganda’s laws were robust enough to address paedophilia, and they already criminalised LGBTQIA+ people; this new law will affect you, political opponent candidates and your children. It is far-reaching and ambiguous. Anyone can be guilty. #ResistAHA23 pic.twitter.com/trWllorXf6 — Uganda Feminist Forum (UFF) (@UgFeministForum) June 29, 2023 Hundreds of people have already been arrested and attacked since the Act was introduced last May. In one case, a man was attacked in his home by a group of men one night. He was beaten and some of his property burnt by the mob, which accused him of being a homosexual. In a similar incident, a lesbian was attacked by two men in her home. She had been evicted by her landlord on the grounds of homosexuality but did not have the resources to move. International reaction to the court’s ruling will no doubt be keenly watched by countries contemplating their own anti-LGBTQ laws, such as Ghana, Kenya, South Sudan and Tanzania. In February, Ghana’s Parliament unanimously passed one of the world’s most draconian anti-LGBTIQ Bills which includes a mandatory three-year prison sentence for a person who simply “identifies” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or queer”. However, the president has yet to sign it into law. Image Credits: Alisdare Hickson/Flickr. Continued Mpox Outbreak Leads US to Re-examine Smallpox Readiness 03/04/2024 Sophia Samantaroy Although smallpox has been eradicated, it is possib;le to recreate it from published genomes. In the wake of surging mpox cases in the DRC and the emergence of novel orthopoxviruses, the US needs to rapidly bolster its smallpox readiness, preparedness, and response, according to a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report brought together experts from across the country to critically evaluate the state of smallpox vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics, known as medical countermeasures (MCMs), in the event of an outbreak. Improving MCMs is crucial for enhancing the nation’s ability to combat a smallpox outbreak or deliberate attack, the report emphasizes. It also stresses the importance of fortifying public health and healthcare systems to swiftly and effectively respond, including mechanisms for rapid vaccine distribution. An ‘evolving bio-threat and technology landscape’ With advancements in genome sequencing and editing technology, it is now possible to recreate live smallpox virus from published genomes, the report warns. US population changes and advancements in gene editing and synthesis technologies have drastically altered the potential for a smallpox outbreak or attack in recent years. But these technologies significantly raise the risk of accidental or intentional release, challenging readiness planning and potentially altering the epidemiology and clinical presentations of the disease. The report notes that even if all existing collections of the virus were destroyed, reemergence is still a threat. Despite the risks, the report underscores the necessity of continued research involving live variola virus for developing and enhancing smallpox MCMs. This research is essential for creating more effective therapies, validating vaccine and treatment efficacy, and establishing animal models for research purposes. Research using these viruses can also fill gaps in our fundamental understanding of orthopoxvirus biology, ecology, evolution, transmission, and disease onset in humans. A call for MCM research and development Three main categories of MCMs need improvement: diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics. More accurate diagnostic tests to detect smallpox and related viruses at earlier stages is paramount. Vaccine safety is also an issue, and the report calls for research into vaccines that can be used across different populations and that are available as a single dose. “Developing new smallpox vaccines that use a multi-vaccine platform – which use common vaccine vectors, manufacturing ingredients, and processes – would improve the capacity for rapid production and reduce the need for stockpiling.” Lastly, the report advocates for safer and more diversified therapeutics, such as antivirals with different and diverse targets, mechanisms, and routes of administration, to supplement existing antivirals. Vulnerabilities: too few manufacturers The smallpox vaccine protects against mpox. The report concluded that the small number of manufacturers capable of producing smallpox medical countermeasures is a specific vulnerability, and that there is currently insufficient capacity to scale production in the event of a large outbreak or attack. Logistics and supply chain management planning is critical, as is planning for regulatory responsiveness. Clinical and public health guidance also needs to be updated to reflect new data and medical countermeasures so that health care providers and others on the front line of public health have the capability and capacity to respond to smallpox. The need for global cooperation Both the COVID-19 pandemic and mpox outbreaks revealed gaps in the US’s ability to respond to new infectious diseases. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the ability of US public health and health care systems to adapt and respond to an unfamiliar pathogen. Mpox, on the other hand, showed the challenges of rapidly making diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics available at scale. Furthermore, the mpox outbreak brought to light the lack of diverse smallpox therapeutics options. Currently, standard research methods rely on challenge studies in animals to understand MCM efficacy in humans, leading to issues with accurately understanding the safety and efficacy in humans. “The gaps in our ability to respond to a new infectious disease were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent mpox outbreak,” said committee chair Prof Larry Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law and professor of medicine at Georgetown University. “It is vital to prioritize research into the development of safer and more effective smallpox diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, make judicious choices in stockpiling, and have modern, well-practiced, and adaptable plans for responding in the event of a smallpox outbreak,” added Gostin, who is also director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Research and development for these MCMs needs to not only consider the actual device or product, but also the ability to “deploy at scale” and equitably to meet the challenges of public acceptance. The report urges effective risk communication for vaccines, as the same challenges with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation could occur in a smallpox outbreak. While the report primarily focused on US readiness and response capabilities, it does note the impact of growing global interdependence in detecting and containing potential smallpox outbreaks. “The COVID-19 pandemic and pox multi-country outbreak, both declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) by WHO, underscore the need for further domestic global coordination for preparedness and response against novel pathogens including orthopoxvirus events,” note the report authors. This means preemptively supporting international MCM capacity as any US response will be “significantly affected” by the ability of other countries to detect and surveil. The report notes that global solidarity is a key component to rapidly identify, contain, respond, and ensure equitable MCM allocation in a smallpox event. Preparedness for similar viruses Smallpox-related viruses such as mpox, Alaskapox, and cowpox are increasingly found in humans, magnifying the need for medical countermeasures that can detect, treat, and prevent these diseases. The report notes that most mpox therapeutics were developed because of investments in smallpox therapeutics. “Direct investment in developing therapeutics targeting circulating orthopoxviruses could similarly benefit smallpox therapeutic preparedness and would likely have more immediate utility and potentially achieve commercial viability.” Image Credits: Isao Arita/ WHO. Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Continued Mpox Outbreak Leads US to Re-examine Smallpox Readiness 03/04/2024 Sophia Samantaroy Although smallpox has been eradicated, it is possib;le to recreate it from published genomes. In the wake of surging mpox cases in the DRC and the emergence of novel orthopoxviruses, the US needs to rapidly bolster its smallpox readiness, preparedness, and response, according to a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report brought together experts from across the country to critically evaluate the state of smallpox vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics, known as medical countermeasures (MCMs), in the event of an outbreak. Improving MCMs is crucial for enhancing the nation’s ability to combat a smallpox outbreak or deliberate attack, the report emphasizes. It also stresses the importance of fortifying public health and healthcare systems to swiftly and effectively respond, including mechanisms for rapid vaccine distribution. An ‘evolving bio-threat and technology landscape’ With advancements in genome sequencing and editing technology, it is now possible to recreate live smallpox virus from published genomes, the report warns. US population changes and advancements in gene editing and synthesis technologies have drastically altered the potential for a smallpox outbreak or attack in recent years. But these technologies significantly raise the risk of accidental or intentional release, challenging readiness planning and potentially altering the epidemiology and clinical presentations of the disease. The report notes that even if all existing collections of the virus were destroyed, reemergence is still a threat. Despite the risks, the report underscores the necessity of continued research involving live variola virus for developing and enhancing smallpox MCMs. This research is essential for creating more effective therapies, validating vaccine and treatment efficacy, and establishing animal models for research purposes. Research using these viruses can also fill gaps in our fundamental understanding of orthopoxvirus biology, ecology, evolution, transmission, and disease onset in humans. A call for MCM research and development Three main categories of MCMs need improvement: diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics. More accurate diagnostic tests to detect smallpox and related viruses at earlier stages is paramount. Vaccine safety is also an issue, and the report calls for research into vaccines that can be used across different populations and that are available as a single dose. “Developing new smallpox vaccines that use a multi-vaccine platform – which use common vaccine vectors, manufacturing ingredients, and processes – would improve the capacity for rapid production and reduce the need for stockpiling.” Lastly, the report advocates for safer and more diversified therapeutics, such as antivirals with different and diverse targets, mechanisms, and routes of administration, to supplement existing antivirals. Vulnerabilities: too few manufacturers The smallpox vaccine protects against mpox. The report concluded that the small number of manufacturers capable of producing smallpox medical countermeasures is a specific vulnerability, and that there is currently insufficient capacity to scale production in the event of a large outbreak or attack. Logistics and supply chain management planning is critical, as is planning for regulatory responsiveness. Clinical and public health guidance also needs to be updated to reflect new data and medical countermeasures so that health care providers and others on the front line of public health have the capability and capacity to respond to smallpox. The need for global cooperation Both the COVID-19 pandemic and mpox outbreaks revealed gaps in the US’s ability to respond to new infectious diseases. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the ability of US public health and health care systems to adapt and respond to an unfamiliar pathogen. Mpox, on the other hand, showed the challenges of rapidly making diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics available at scale. Furthermore, the mpox outbreak brought to light the lack of diverse smallpox therapeutics options. Currently, standard research methods rely on challenge studies in animals to understand MCM efficacy in humans, leading to issues with accurately understanding the safety and efficacy in humans. “The gaps in our ability to respond to a new infectious disease were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent mpox outbreak,” said committee chair Prof Larry Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law and professor of medicine at Georgetown University. “It is vital to prioritize research into the development of safer and more effective smallpox diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, make judicious choices in stockpiling, and have modern, well-practiced, and adaptable plans for responding in the event of a smallpox outbreak,” added Gostin, who is also director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Research and development for these MCMs needs to not only consider the actual device or product, but also the ability to “deploy at scale” and equitably to meet the challenges of public acceptance. The report urges effective risk communication for vaccines, as the same challenges with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation could occur in a smallpox outbreak. While the report primarily focused on US readiness and response capabilities, it does note the impact of growing global interdependence in detecting and containing potential smallpox outbreaks. “The COVID-19 pandemic and pox multi-country outbreak, both declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) by WHO, underscore the need for further domestic global coordination for preparedness and response against novel pathogens including orthopoxvirus events,” note the report authors. This means preemptively supporting international MCM capacity as any US response will be “significantly affected” by the ability of other countries to detect and surveil. The report notes that global solidarity is a key component to rapidly identify, contain, respond, and ensure equitable MCM allocation in a smallpox event. Preparedness for similar viruses Smallpox-related viruses such as mpox, Alaskapox, and cowpox are increasingly found in humans, magnifying the need for medical countermeasures that can detect, treat, and prevent these diseases. The report notes that most mpox therapeutics were developed because of investments in smallpox therapeutics. “Direct investment in developing therapeutics targeting circulating orthopoxviruses could similarly benefit smallpox therapeutic preparedness and would likely have more immediate utility and potentially achieve commercial viability.” Image Credits: Isao Arita/ WHO. Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Mpox: Is the World Failing the Next Pandemic Preparedness Litmus Test? 02/04/2024 Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Dimie Ogoina, Francine Ntoumi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Samba Sow, Spring Gombe & Jessica Ilunga A patient participating in a clinical trial of Tpoxx, an antiviral treatment for the mpox virus, in the Central African Republic. At a time when the world is negotiating the best way forward for sustained preparedness to address pandemics, it is still exhibiting collective failure to learn from past outbreaks and a glaring gap in global health security. Mpox is one case in point – and a test case for global intent on pandemic preparedness. In a remote village in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, a 55-year-old man’s life was forever changed by mpox. For weeks, he suffered alone, his body and face ravaged by extensive lesions. Shunned by local health clinics and stigmatized by his community, he endured not just the physical agony of mpox but also its profound psychological toll. By the time he reached a hospital willing to treat him, it was too late to save his vision, permanently impaired by keratitis. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a mother in the Mongala province faced the agony of watching her three children suffer from mpox. The eldest child, aged seven, was the first to contract the disease. As all the children shared clothes, the younger siblings, aged four and five, fell ill too, weaving a tapestry of shared suffering. Human cost of inaction These heart-wrenching stories are a stark reminder of the human cost of inaction. Far from being isolated incidents, they painfully illustrate the dire consequences of global neglect in addressing mpox, particularly in Africa. For over 50 years, this African disease has been neglected by the international community with limited or no investments in surveillance. Despite the growing threat posed by the disease, almost no mpox vaccines and few therapeutics have reached Nigeria, DRC or other West African countries at the epicenter of the epidemic. Moreover, critical funding for research and the development of more effective, affordable and accessible diagnostic tools, vaccines, and treatments remains woefully insufficient. Caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), mpox has been endemic in most parts of central and western Africa since the 1970s, after first being discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research. Until very recently, the more pathogenic clade I strain of the MPXV was restricted to a few Central African countries, particularly the DRC. Infants, children and young adults, mostly in rural settings and in close contact with the animal reservoir, experienced stigma, and excruciating pain due to mpox skin lesions and frequently severe disease that led to deaths. The clade II strain, which is common in West Africa, causes less severe disease but also negatively impacts on the health and socioeconomic livelihoods of affected patients and their families. In Africa, the disease was largely spread from animal-human spillover events, with only a few, limited cases of human-to-human transmission within households, before transmission would ‘burn out’ locally. Unfortunately, due to poverty, weak health systems and other resource-constraints, countries, communities and families facing the challenge of mpox were unable to adequately respond and contain the disease. But the virus continued to evolve and mutate so as to be more effective in transmission to humans, including sexual transmission. More dangerous Clade 1 infections spreading rapidly Men queuing for the mpox vaccine in Chicago in the US. Many African countries have yet to receive mpox vaccines despite the disease being endemic in parts of central and west Africa. In July 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on account of the global spread of the disease to over 100 countries in all continents of the world. For the first time in history, many countries outside Africa were reporting community transmission of mpox without any travel link to previously endemic African countries. Whereas prior outbreaks of mpox in Africa were largely zoonotic related, in 2022, mpox was unusually spreading mostly among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) by sexual contact. The declaration of mpox as a PHEIC was intended to foster immediate and coordinated international action to contain the virus and prevent its further spread. The WHO external situation report of the 2022 multi-country outbreak has continually emphasized the significant knowledge gaps regarding route of transmission and risk factors for mpox among affected African countries. Although mpox now seems to have been contained in most high-income countries, little has changed in West and Central Africa where the disease is endemic. The story of neglect remains largely the same. The DRC, meanwhile, remains in the throes of its largest outbreak ever. Since January 2023, over 12,000 suspected cases have been reported in the DRC, only 9% of which were definitively laboratory tested due to resource-constraints. In November 2023, the WHO announced the detection of clusters of mpox cases linked to sexual contact among GBMSM in the DRC, the first reports of sexual transmission of the clade I strain in history. This unprecedented observation should be a wake-up call to re-examine investments and commitments to address the challenge of mpox in previously endemic countries, to avert another re-emergence of a global health emergency due to mpox. The first few months of 2024 reflect an alarming surge in suspect cases and fatalities due to mpox, surpassing figures from the previous two years. WHO responses The WHO has developed a standing recommendation and a medium- to long-term mpox strategic response plan. To inform development and deployment of mpox-related medical countermeasures such as therapeutics and vaccines, the WHO published Target Product Profiles and developed a core protocol for the conduct of therapeutic clinical trials related to mpox. Affected countries, mostly high-income countries in Europe and America, have intensified risk communication and social mobilization, heightened surveillance and deployed existing smallpox-related vaccines and therapeutics (thought to be cross-protective against mpox) for use by the most at-risk social groups under an emergency use authorization. These include MVA-BN, produced by the Belgium-based Bavarian Nordic and LC16 KMB, produced by Japanese firm KM Biologics. As clinical efficacy trials on mpox vaccines and therapeutics were lacking, many collaborative efforts were initiated or strengthened, to facilitate the conduct of mpox clinical trials. These coordinated international responses led to a sustained global decline in the number of new cases of mpox and the outbreak was effectively contained in most countries outside Africa by December 2022. In May 2023, the WHO declared an end to the mpox global emergency. While declaring the end to the mpox emergency, the Mpox Emergency Committee indicated that “the gains in control of the multi-country outbreak of mpox have been achieved largely in the absence of outside funding support and that longer-term control and elimination are unlikely unless such support is provided”. ‘Not one dollar’ to support mpox in endemic countries And yet, as Dr Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, pointed out: “[mpox] is a neglected disease […]. In fact, WHO had to fund all of this international response purely on the basis of a contingency fund for emergencies. Not one dollar was received from donors to support this response and support countries.” That means no donor funds have been available to strengthen mpox diagnosis, treatment, vaccination and control in the endemic countries like DRC, Nigeria and other neighboring countries in West Africa. Regardless of the risks posed to people in the region – or globally. Moreover, neither of the existing vaccines, both only available in limited supplies, are ideal for low- and middle income settings. The MVA-BN requires two jabs while the LC16 KMB is administered intradermally, a procedure unfamiliar to many rank-and-file health workers in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need to fund research for adapted, affordable and available medical countermeasures. Today only tecovirimat, an oral treatment developed by SIGA, has received approval for use, based on animal data, in the European Union (EU) and US. When mpox cases rose, it was decided that a robust controlled clinical trial, confirming tecovirimat’s efficacy and safety in patients with mpox would be needed. Tecovirimat has to be administered twice daily after a solid food meal, and it is being investigated in the DRC in supervised, hospitalized patients. No data have yet been generated for any other African country where Clade II occurs, nor in an outpatient setting. No other treatment has yet been investigated in patients. Tecovirimat is not approved in any African country and not yet available, even for compassionate use in Africa in clinical routine care. Five clinical trials Globally, there are currently only five randomized trials being conducted or planned on mpox treatments: UNITY (Switzerland, Brazil, Argentina), EPOXI (Europe), STOMP (USA, International), PALM007 (DRC) and MOSA (Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, DRC, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria). All the trials are testing tecovirimat as monotherapy. STOMP and PALM007 are funded through NIH/NIAID. MOSA is a platform adaptive trial in Africa that could test other treatment arms, which is sponsored by PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) and receives partial support from the European Union. Horizon Europe is funding mainly the EPOXI trial in Europe, although it is also providing some support to UNITY. However, there is still a large funding gap to cover for the completion of those trials, especially in Africa. Furthermore, whereas various north south collaborations between African scientists and other researchers from across the globe are ongoing, there are still glaring gaps in investments in mpox surveillance, as well as available diagnostics and treatments in affected countries. In Africa, children worst affected While in the Clade II global health emergency, most of the victims were men, in Africa, the Clade I victims are now mostly children under the age of 16. The number of skin lesions that each person with Clade I experiences is much higher – up to several hundred in comparison with tens in Clade II. Bacterial infections and underlying malnutrition can increase morbidity and the case fatality ratio is definitely higher in Africa than in high income countries. Those features are contextual and must be considered during drug development as they may significantly affect treatments’ strategies and overall efficacy. At the same time, if mutations in Clade I mpox in the DRC are changing the pattern of infection and transmission, then new treatments are all the more critical to not only end the local outbreak but to prevent it from spreading more widely via sexual contact and other means. Test of humanity The tardiness of action on mpox demands an immediate and concerted effort from the international community. By prioritizing research and vaccine development, enhancing international collaboration, and addressing stigmatization, we can strengthen our global preparedness for emerging health threats. As recently stated by Africa CDC, “vulnerable populations worldwide must have access to life-saving interventions”. We stand at a crossroads between repeating past oversights and forging a new path of true equity and foresight. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made over Ebola when funding was only made available when high-income countries were at risk. It is time to harness the spirit of international collaboration. Building on positive initiatives like the UNITY trial, nations must come together to address the unique challenges posed by mpox and respond to the specific needs of African patients. Mpox isn’t just a test of our global intent on preparedness – it’s a test of our humanity. In honoring the memory of the young victims, like an eight-day-old baby girl in DRC, we must pledge to do better, act faster, and create a global health infrastructure that is as inclusive as it is effective. Prof Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum is the Director General of the DRC’s National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa, Professor of Microbiology at the University of Kinshasa Medical and the inaugural president of the Congolese Academy of Science. He is co-discoverer of the Ebola virus in 1976 and co-inventor of the monoclonal antibody “ mAb114”, approved by FDA as an Ebola treatment, Ebanga, in December 2020. The INRB is conducting the PALM007 study on Tecovorimat in mpox patients. Prof Dimie Ogoina is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Ogoina’s team were the first to describe sexual transmission of mpox in Nigeria in 2017. He was a member of the World Health Organization IHR Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of mpox. Prof Francine Ntoumi is head of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research, which she founded 15 years ago. She has over 20 years of experience in basic and clinical research in infectious diseases particularly malaria, HIV and tuberculosis, in endemic countries and Europe. Dr Nathalie Strub Wourgaft has been Delegate General for the PANdemic preparedness plaTform for Health and Emerging infectious Response (PANTHER) since its creation in 2022. Prior to that, she was Director of NTDs and later for COVID and pandemic preparedness at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) from 2009 to 2022. Prof Samba Sow is Director of CVD-Mali. A medical doctor and epidemiologist, Sow was Minister of Health and Public Hygiene for Mali between April 2017 and May 2019 and instituted a series of health sector reforms to provide free antenatal and maternal healthcare as well as free care for children under five years old. In 2020, he was appointed WHO Special Envoy for COVID-19 in West Africa. Spring Gombe is the Strategic Policy Advisor to PANTHER, providing policy and program management support to entities working with vulnerable and marginalised groups with limited access to health technologies. Jessica Ilunga is the Co-founder and Strategic Communication Partner of Galuni Consulting Associates, an Africa-focused advisory firm based in Brussels. She previously worked as Communications Director at the Ministry of Health in the DRC. Image Credits: TRT World Now/Twitter . Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy
Global Leaders Offer Support to Gambia to Uphold Ban on Female Genital Mutilation 02/04/2024 Kerry Cullinan Save Hands for Girls campaigns against female genital mutilation in The Gambia by working with schools, parents and organisations. Global health and parliamentary leaders have offered to support The Gambia to maintain its ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), expressing “profound concern” over a recent attempt to reverse the ban. The business committee of Gambia’s parliament is currently contemplating whether to allow the passage of a Private Members Bill which aims to reverse the landmark Women’s (Amendment) Act of 2015, which outlawed FGM. The Bill was introduced by Almameh Gibba, an MP from the Alliance for the Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC), with the support of Imam Abdoulie Fatty, a notorious proponent of FGM. The process involves the partial of total removal of external female genitalia – supposedly to “control” women’s sexuality – and is usually performed on girls under the age of 15. But this attempt to reintroduce FGM has been condemned by the leadership of both the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health and well-being, which is hosted by World Health Organization (WHO), and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the global organisation of national parliaments. They urge the Members of the National Assembly to continue to protect the “hard-won” ban on FGM, warning in a statement issued over the weekend that repealing the ban “would not only undermine this progress but also perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and violence against women and girls”. Despite the banning of FGM nine years ago, almost three-quarters of Gambian women are estimated to have been subjected to the practice, and almost half were cut before their 15th birthday. There has only been one FGM-related conviction in the past nine years involving three women for cutting babies aged four to 12 months old, according to women’s rights activist Jama Jack. They received fines which were paid by Fatty via a public fundraising campaign, added Jack. ‘All possible support’ “We pledge all possible support to The Gambia in strengthening its efforts to prevent and address this harmful practice through multi-sectoral actions. This includes ensuring robust enforcement mechanisms, increasing access to quality healthcare services, and promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives,” according to the statement, which is signed by PMNCH leaders Helen Clark, Joy Phumaphi, Githinji Gitahi and Flavia Bustreo, and IPU Secretary General Martin Chungong. “FGM is a grave violation of human rights and a harmful practice with severe health consequences, including physical, psychological, and reproductive and sexual health complications,” they add. “FGM is associated with increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, perinatal death, as well as urinary tract infections, menstrual difficulties and mental health conditions over the life course of women and girls.” The PMNCH and the IPU emphasise the importance of upholding international human rights standards and commitments to protect women and girls from all forms of violence and discrimination. “As a signatory to various international instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol), The Gambia has a duty to uphold its obligations to its people and prioritize the health and rights of its population,” they remind the country. Domino effect? “Combatting FGM requires partnership at all levels. Parliamentarians can develop and uphold comprehensive legal frameworks; opinion leaders, including faith leaders, are needed to speak out firmly against the practice; community members, including health workers, can carry out powerful awareness campaigns based on lived experience, ensuring that care and support for survivors are integrated into sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services.” Meanwhile, Bustreo, who chairs PMNCH’s governance and ethics committee, said that her organisation was concerned about potential copycat moves. “The concern lies in the potential for a domino effect if an anti-FGM law is repealed, signaling to others that similar regressive steps are acceptable,” Bustreo told Health Policy Watch. “This isn’t merely about changing legislation; it’s about preserving the progress made in safeguarding the rights and well-being of women and girls. Repealing such laws threatens to erase years of dedicated advocacy and community engagement.” Around 90% of women in Somalia, Guinea and Djibouti are subjected to FGM, and a range of organisations fear that The Gambia’s reversal will encourage other countries in West Africa to follow suit. Over 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to a report from the UN children’s agency, UNICEF, released earlier this month. This is a 15% increase since eight years ago. Image Credits: Safe Hands for Girls. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts