Unitaid will expand its work in malaria to include chemoprevention for infants in the first year of life and pilot a new “agility” mechanism to support global health innovation in 2020, following approval granted by Unitaid’s Executive Board on November 20 to 21.

(left-right) ED Lelio Marmora, Board Vice-Chair Maria Luisa Escoral de Moraes, Board Chair Marisol Touraine, Deputy ED Philippe Duneton

The Board’s approval will allow Unitaid to launch a call for proposals for projects on malaria chemoprevention for infants.

“Chemoprevention is a key piece of the puzzle in the fight against malaria,” said Unitaid Executive Director Lelio Marmora in a press release.

“Adding infant malaria chemoprevention to Unitaid’s expanding malaria portfolio will not only protect millions of babies from this deadly disease but also help reignite the stalled progress in the global malaria response.” 

Infants and children are highly vulnerable to malaria because they have not yet developed protective immunity, according to Unitaid. Of the 435,000 malaria deaths in 2017, more than 60 percent occurred in children under 5.

Currently, malaria chemoprevention, or the strategy of providing medication to prevent malaria, is used by Global Fund financed programmes protect children 3 to 59 months old during the four-month rainy season in 12 countries in the Sahel, based on evidence from a Unitaid/Malaria Consortium project (ACCESS-SMC). Unitaid also invests in projects to expand and monitor malaria chemoprevention in pregnant women.

In a separate decision, the Board approved up to US$20 million in 2020 to fund a new framework to respond quickly to global health innovation, delegating the authority to enter into legal agreements under the pilot to the Executive Director. Current ED Lelio Marmora also announced to the Board that he will be stepping down by March 2020, and Deputy Executive Director Philippe Duneton has been identified as acting ED in the interim.

Image Credits: Unitaid.

A global campaign focusing on the issue of rape as a form of violence against women is being launched Monday on International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. The annual sixteen-day campaign, which is set to end on 10 December, Human Rights Day, will bring together activism against gender-based violence under this year’s theme “Orange the World: Generation Equality Stands against Rape.

“We must show greater solidarity with survivors, advocates and women’s rights defenders. And we must promote women’s rights and equal opportunities,” said UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in a video message. “Together, we can – and must — end rape and sexual assault of all kinds.”

WHO has called violence against women a “public-health problem,” estimating that one in three women globally have experienced some form of sexual or physical violence in their lifetime. Most violence is perpetrated by intimate partners or other people the women know; almost one third of women who have been in a relationship report that they have experienced some form of physical or sexual violence, including rape, by an intimate partner in their lifetime according to the WHO.

The statistics around the prevalence of rape can be unclear, but UN Women’s Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka notes in an official statement that “almost universally, most perpetrators of rape go unreported or unpunished.”

Mlambo-Ngcuka further adds that women require a great deal of “resilience to re-live the attack, a certain amount of knowledge of where to go, and a degree of confidence in the responsiveness of the services sought – if indeed there are services available to go to” in order to decide to report sexual violence. For those who do report, especially adolescent girls, less than 10% go to the police, Ngcuka says.

Health-care providers are often the first point of professional contact for a woman experiencing violence, according to the WHO. Women who are abused are more likely to seek health services even if they do not explicitly seek care for violence, making providers important first responders for survivors of sexual violence.

WHO launched global guidelines for healthcare providers to respond to sexual violence in 2013 and began working with partners to implement trainings for healthcare workers in India, Namibia, Pakistan, Uganda and Zambia. A pilot of the trainings was completed in two tertiary hospitals in the State of Maharashtra India, and a recent assessment of the impact of the trainings done by the Center for Enquiry into Health and Allied Theme (CEHAT) will be used to inform a potential national-roll out of the trainings.

See here for more information about the WHO Guidelines for Healthcare Providers and WHO and CEHAT’s work in Maharashtra.

See here for more information about the “16 Days of Activism Against Gender-based Violence.”

 

Image Credits: UNICEF/Nesbitt.

Over the last 20 years, MMV has worked with over 400 partner organizations in 55 countries; involving tens of thousands of individuals. At a recent anniversary event held in Geneva, some of those key players told their stories – bringing to life the contributions made by so many more people over the past 20 years.

 

As Mauro Poggia, Swiss State Advisor who accompanied the ceremonies said, “MMV has played a key role in developing the new medicines that are being used for malaria and thanks to those treatments, it’s 2 million human lives that have been saved. Public health is a public good… and health can only be assured when it is undertaken when all of the parties converge, be they the manufacturers, the researchers, the individuals, the pharma industries. It is only together that we will see this deadly infectious disease eliminated.”

But each life saved is also more than a number. It is a story, said David Reddy, chief executive officer at MMV,When I first started at MMV back in 2011 one of my first duties was to attend a meeting of the African Leaders Malaria Alliance, in Ethiopia where I went to a rural health clinic and met a little girl called Zakhiya. She was suffering from malnutrition and malaria, but was being cured with one of the MMV-partnership drugs. This made me realize how successful my predecessors had been, how grateful I was for what they had achieved and determined to carry this forward.”

Health Policy-Watch presents key excerpts of several successful partnerships, as told by some of the people who helped make the history.  

David Reddy
Opening Act – Coartem for Children

MMV’s first story begins back in 2003 – At that time, a medicine called Coartem®, developed by the Swiss pharmaceutical company Novartis, had become the artemisinin-based combination therapy (or ACT) of choice for treating uncomplicated malaria in adults. However, there were no high-quality ACTs formulated specifically for use in children. Equipped with insights into the realities of treating malaria in the field, MMV worked with Novartis to develop a new dispersible formulation of Coartem that would be safe for use in those most at risk – small children. Since the launch of Coartem Dispersible 10 years ago, 385 million treatments have been distributed to malaria-endemic countries. It’s estimated to have saved the lives of around 825,000 children to date. Lessons learned, from paediatric clinical trials to packaging, have paved the way for the development of other child-friendly formulations.

(left – right) Jaya Banerji, Rebecca Stevens, Hans Rietveld

Rebecca Stevens, head of Global Health Partnerships at Novartis

For me, the story of Coartem is a very personal one. As a young child growing up in Sierra Leone, I often had to take bitter tablets whenever I had malaria. More than the illness itself, taking the bitter tablets was just horrible. So, with Coartem Dispersible, MMV and Novartis have significantly contributed to making taking medicine much less traumatic, while providing children with a life-saving treatment for uncomplicated malaria. As a Sierra Leonean, and an African – I am proud to have played a role in helping to develop a medicine that will have a positive impact on the lives of African children.

Hans Rietveld, director of the Access & Product Management Team at MMV

Finding the right formulation was not straightforward, and I remember the persistence of the MMV team pushing for a dispersible tablet – rather than granules in a capsule, or sachet packaging. When the formulation was agreed upon, we realized that bioequivalence between the crushed tablets and the dispersible tablets could not be established, hence the need for a pivotal Phase III clinical trial involving 900 patients. With efficacy and safety established, the collaboration naturally extended to jointly developing and testing patient-centric packaging to aid with treatment adherence. We developed and tested a comprehensive training toolkit for health workers for the roll-out of the new formulation.

Jaya Banerji, senior director of Communications in Corporate Affairs at MMV

Administering the drug to children was a complex process, and because of this, we committed to supporting local healthcare workers and communities to ensure safe use of the medicine and thus maximize the benefit to young patients. To make it easier for caregivers with lower literacy and to transcend language barriers, we used iconography and infographics in our communications, an approach that was very well received and effective.

Around the time that MMV and Novartis began to work on Coartem Dispersible, another major problem needed to be addressed – the empty antimalarial drug pipeline. MMV partnered with global pharmaceutical companies to explore their chemical libraries for novel compounds to replenish the pipeline, and supported the establishment of high-throughput technology to enable a better and faster screening process. Since the early 2000s, MMV’s platforms have catalysed the discovery of 30 novel drug candidates, and continue to evolve in response to market need.

Act II – Honing the Science of Molecule Screening, Drug Assays & Chemical Fingerprints

Elizabeth Winzeler, professor, School of Medicine,  University of California, San Diego

In 2004, I ran an academic lab at the Scripps Research Institute that had been developing high-throughput ways of studying malaria parasites. Given my lab’s expertise in parasite biology, and the institute’s high-throughput phenotypic screening capabilities, which in early 2000’s were unparalleled, we set about developing inexpensive, simple and precise assays that might predict if a compound could be developed into an effective antimalarial medicine.

(left-right) Elizabeth WInzeler, Javier-Gamo Benito, Didier Leroy

Javier Gamo-Benito, researcher, GlaxoSmithKline

At the same time, we were developing a methodology at GSK to allow us to accurately measure the killing rate of a given drug and shed light on its possible mechanisms of action… We found notable differences between widely- used standard antimalarials in terms of killing rate. We realized that this could help with the prioritization and clinical development of future antimalarials. Most recent antimalarial candidates have been analysed through our assay in collaboration with MMV and GSK. In fact, the parasite reduction ratio has become an important part of the data package for new compounds and plays an important role in portfolio prioritization decisions.

Didier Leroy, senior director in Drug Discovery at MMV

High-throughput screening technology made the cost of screening projects competitive, it made collaboration with Pharmaceutical companies viable. To date, MMV and partners have developed and validated more than 15 different assays throughout the entire life cycle of the parasite. Seven years ago, we published a fingerprinting exercise whereby around 50 molecules representing the chemical diversity of the various classes of antimalarials were used to validate these assays. Being able to reconstitute in vitro the complexity of the life cycle of the parasite was the basis of our current process for the profiling of our portfolio compounds… Today, we continue to explore ways to harness new technology to improve our discovery and translational platforms whose fundamental bases were established 10 years ago by our deeply missed visionary colleague Ian Bathurst.

Act III – Pyramax

It can take 10 to 15 years to bring a new drug to market. In 2001, MMV and Shin Poong, a Korean pharmaceutical company, joined forces to develop and deliver Pyramax®, a powerful and convenient alternative ACT. This project brought about a valuable therapy that may never have come to market without a partnership approach.

Isabelle Borghini–Fuhrer, senior director of Product Development and Lead on the Pyramax Project

We designed and conducted five Phase III trials, in Asia, in Africa, in adults, in children, in Plasmodium falciparum and in Plasmodium vivax. Some of the trials were so successful that the children were climbing out of the windows to play with their friends before the end of the three-day protocol for administration of the drug. Following up with them sometimes involved interrupting a game of football!

Members of the Pyramax team (From left to right): Adam Aspinall, Isabelle Borghini, Bernards Ogutu.

So why Pyramax? Well, in 1999, the WHO approached Shin Poong to explore whether it would be possible to develop a new ACT (combining pyronaridine and artesunate) to diversify front-line treatment options for malaria, in anticipation of the possible emergence of resistance. Despite being mainly focused on manufacturing and distributing generics, then Chairman of Shin Poong, Mr Yong Taek Chang, accepted wholeheartedly. In 2001, MMV was invited to contribute its antimalarial drug development expertise to the project… We are delighted that Mr Chang’s son is also passionate about Pyramax and will continue our partnership, developing and today facilitating access to the product in malaria endemic countries.

Professor Bernhards Ogutu, chief research officer at the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)

The real-world evidence generated by MMV and partners looking at Pyramax has been really important for us as frontline care givers and policy makers – it informs policy change by letting us know whether new treatments or ways of deploying them will be effective. It allows us to teach evidence-based medicine to our health workers and help them make effective treatment decision, and it is needed for consensus building among stakeholders, so we can all understand what options (both medicines and deployment strategies) are available and decide which one will work best for us. Adding Pyramax, with its huge data package, to the antimalarial options we have in our country gives us healthcare professionals more choice.

ACT IV – Injectable & Rectal Artesunate – Getting Effective Products Into the Field

Today, injectable artesunate has become the recommended frontline therapy for severe malaria with the first such WHO Pre-Qualified treatment, Artesun®, approved in 33 countries worldwide. Since 2010, 144 million vials of Artesun®, Fosun Pharma’s injectable artesunate product, have been delivered, saving an estimated 950,000 additional lives, in comparison to what would have been the outcomes with quinine, the former standard of care. In 2018, as demand continued to grow, MMV supported a second manufacturer (Ipca) in achieving WHO prequalification as well, ensuring supply security. But ensuring formal approval and widespread use of rectal and injectable artesunate was not a foregone conclusion.

(left-right) Pierre Hugo, Christian Lengeler, Elizabeth Chizema Kawesha

Pierre Hugo, senior director of Access & Product Management at MMV

I worked with partners to support the introduction and use of injectable artesunate in the DRC – a country with the highest rate of severe malaria, and consequently the highest death rate from malaria in the world. Already in 2011 Médecins Sans Frontières had released a policy paper advocating for countries to switch from quinine to injectable artesunate for severe malaria. So, with Artesun already WHO-prequalifed, in 2012, we set out to successfully bring injectable artesunate to one of the hardest-hit countries in the world. We knew it would be an uphill struggle to get severe malaria treatment to patients, but – with the help of our partners (STPH, PMI and PNLP) – we succeeded.

Christian Lengeler, professor of Epidemiology at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH)

In 2012, with MMV’s support, we embarked on a feasibility study called MATIAS in the Democratic Republic of Congo, to support implementation of the policy of using injectable artesunate to treat severe malaria at health facilities. The results confirmed that injectable artesunate was safe, easier to use than quinine, and led to better treatment outcomes, and this was the evidence base for large-scale implementation in the DRC.

Elizabeth Chizema, coordinator of Zambia’s End Malaria Council and former director of the National Malaria Elimination Centre in the Zambian Ministry of Health

Giving rectal artesunate to children with suspected severe malaria allows us to buy time while the child is transported to a district health facility. Almost 100% of the children treated with rectal artesunate for suspected severe malaria in a pilot study in two districts reached a health facility in good time.

Zambia recently revised its national policy to align with WHO recommendations, replacing quinine with injectable artesunate for treatment of severe malaria, and rectal artesunate for the pre-referral management. To make this successful, we worked with partners to train almost 14,000 community health volunteers to proactively diagnose and manage cases of severe malaria at the community level, rather than waiting for cases to present at district health facilities. This in turn reduces the pool of individuals who can contribute to malaria transmission. Ultimately, for maximum coverage, we hope that initiatives like this will, one day, be present in all 114 districts of Zambia. I also hope that our experience will inspire other African countries to consider similar projects and forge new collaborations.

ACT V –Human Volunteer Infection Studies – Accelerating Clinical Development

Since 2012, human volunteer infection studies have helped to transform the antimalarial drug development pathway, accelerating the development and prioritization of new medicines. This ground-breaking platform, offered an ethical means of bridging the gap between safety studies in volunteers, which only tested a drug’s adverse effects but not its efficacy, and clinical trials in difficult field conditions among people who were actually ill, many of them children. Since there are efficacious medicines for malaria available, healthy volunteers infected with the parasite in carefully controlled conditions could always be cleared of the disease with an approved drug once the experimental drug was tested:

(left-right) James McCarthy, Jörg Möhrle

Jörg Möhrle, vice president and head of Translational Medicine at MMV

By the end of 2010, our pipeline was starting to fill up with new chemical entities, and we needed a way to characterize their activity – alone and in combination – without placing a huge burden on patients. Following the completion of first-in-human Phase I trials, there was still a significant gap in our understanding between the tolerability of a drug in volunteer patients and the ability of that drug to kill parasites in real-life patients at a well-tolerated dose. Interestingly, infecting humans with the malaria parasite was a concept that had originally been used to treat patients with syphilis, as malaria caused episodes of high fever that killed Treponema pallidum. In malaria research, human infection studies had previously been used during the development of primaquine, mefloquine and atovaquone/proguanil. So, when MMV was looking for ways to properly characterize the antimalarial activity of new and repurpose-able drugs (i.e. those with the good safety data), this was an obvious way to go.

James McCarthy, professor of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases at The University of Queensland, School of Medicine

I worked with MMV to develop a way to experimentally infect healthy volunteers with malaria and let their parasitemia grow to a level where we could test how well antimalarial drugs work in killing parasites… At a time when a major focus of everyone doing medical research and anti-infective product development is on minimising risk, the idea of deliberately infecting people with a potentially lethal infection takes some getting used to, but by the end of this year, we will have characterised over 16 drugs, and 2 combinations in over 300 volunteers. In addition to studying the activity of drugs on asexual blood-stage parasites, we can now observe the effect of new drugs on female and male gametocytes, and assess the ability of new compounds to block onward transmission of the disease. We have K13-mutant, artesunate-resistant parasites suitable for use in the volunteer studies, which enables us to test drugs that can hopefully combat the spread of drug resistance. On top of all this, the work we have done together has opened up new possibilities to investigate how pathogenic organisms make us sick, as well as discovering new ways to diagnose them, and prevent them killing us with drugs or vaccines.

ACT VI –Building Research Networks in Endemic Countries

A key thrust of MMV’s work in the past 20 years, as well as the future, has been partnerships with clinicians, researchers and institutions in endemic countries of Africa, Latin America and South East Asia to build institutional capacity for more local research and development. In particular, MMV has focused on empowering African institutions, scientists and industry to join the fight against malaria and be part of the solution to one of the continent’s greatest health threats. One of the first anchors of this collaboration was a partnership created between MMV and the University of Cape Town (UCT), later to include the Universities of Gondar and Jimma in Ethiopia to continue research on the first antimalarial compound to be discovered by an African-led team, MMV048.

(left-right) Kelly Chibale, Cristina Donini, Rezika Mohammed, Daniel Yilma

Kelly Chibale, director, Drug Development and Discovery Centre, University of Cape Town in South Africa

I met Tim Wells at London’s Heathrow airport in 2008…The collaboration we started that day was based on a shared passion to energize and advance drug discovery in Africa, empowering a new generation of scientists to participate in the fight against malaria. We started by taking forward small-molecule starting points, or ‘hits’, identified from high-throughput screening of a commercial compound library from BioFocus.

The screening was conducted at the Eskitis Institute of Griffiths University, in Brisbane, Australia, by Prof. Vicky Avery. The in vitro and in vivo biology was carried out by Dr Sergio Wittlin at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), and Prof. Susan Charman conducted the in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetics at the Centre for Drug Candidate Optimisation at Monash University, in Melbourne, Australia. MMV also appointed an experienced project mentor, Dr Michael J Witty, who had 30 years of pharmaceutical industry experience with Pfizer. Thanks to the success of this project, the MMV–UCT partnership has facilitated the formation of a research hub at UCT, with the infrastructure, experience and knowledge of regulatory requirements needed to pursue the clinical development of novel therapies.

Rezika Mohammed, researcher at the University of Gondar and Daniel Yilma, researcher at Jimma University in Ethiopia

In 2017, following successful completion of the first-in-human trials at UCT, we started a Phase IIa clinical trial of MMV048 at two sites in Ethiopia…It was a stressful project in the beginning, but ultimately very exciting to see the patients successfully treated with MMV048, without any safety concerns. In terms of local capacity-building, the trial has brought huge benefits. We now have new infrastructure in place, new equipment in our health centres that meets good clinical practice guidelines, and better-trained staff than we had previously… Empowering African researchers to come up with solutions to the health challenges in their communities is so important for the future, and we hope our experience will inspire new collaborations and capacity-building efforts.

ACT VII –Tafenoquine for Relapsing Malaria

The Plasmodium falciparum parasite is the big killer worldwide, but the burden of relapsing malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax is often neglected. Relapsing malaria affects 7.5 million people and threatens 2.5 billion – a third of the world’s population – every year. For over a decade, MMV and GSK worked to co-develop a new drug for relapsing malaria. In 2018, they shepherded tafenoquine, the first new therapy for relapsing malaria in more than 60 years, to regulatory approval. But deployment of tafenoquine remains complex. It requires two suitable point-of-care diagnostics before it can be launched: one for confirmation of the P. vivax infection, and another to make sure patients have adequate G6PD enzyme to ensure the medicine can be administered safely. Here are members of the tafenoquine team to tell us about this new treatment and its deployment:

(left-right) Elodie Jambert, Alison Webster

Elodie Jambert, director of Access & Product Management at MMV

For 60 years, the only approved treatment for P. vivax malaria was primaquine, a treatment administered once a day for 14 days. As you can imagine, this long regimen led to issues with patient compliance, so the global community desperately sought a cure requiring fewer doses – ideally a single-dose cure 

In 2008, MMV and GSK embarked on a programme to find the right dose of tafenoquine and then the right Phase III population to get the drug approved and to market – as a radical cure for the prevention of relapse caused by P. vivax. After 9 years in clinical development, tafenoquine was approved by the US FDA and the Australian TGA in 2018. And I’m pleased to announce that the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency has just this month granted Marketing Authorization Application for single-dose tafenoquine – and the regulatory submission process is ongoing in other vivax-endemic countries.

Alison Webster, head physician of the Diseases of the Developing World Unit at GSK

Specific diagnostic tools were needed to accompany the launch of tafenoquine because both primaquine and tafenoquine, which belong to the same class of compounds (the 8-aminoquinolines), can cause haemolysis in individuals deficient in the enzyme G6PD. We were very clear at the outset that launching a drug for relapsing malaria would need an as-yet-unavailable, affordable, point-of-care diagnostic for G6PD deficiency, and we would need experts in diagnostic development to take the lead on this.

To help identify patients eligible for treatment, MMV’s partner PATH supported the development of a quantitative, point-of-care G6PD diagnostic tool that has been approved by the Expert Review Panel for Diagnostics, and by many P. vivax-endemic countries. Now that tafenoquine and the G6PD diagnostic tool are available, we are busy generating the evidence to support their use in both rural and urban settings before tafenoquine is made more widely available. We hope that tafenoquine will deliver both individual and public health benefit in terms of reduced relapses and onward transmission of P. vivax, and will help us take another step towards the eventual elimination of relapsing malaria in P. vivax-endemic countries.

Editor’s Note: This series was supported by MMV 

 

Image Credits: E Fletcher/HP-Watch, MMV.

Oslo – Norway has launched a milestone “Better Health, Better Life” strategy to combat deadly non-communicable (NCDs) diseases as part of its international development assistance. This makes Norway the first to develop a strategy for combating this large and growing global health threat, which currently receives only about 1% of international health assistance.

NCDs are the cause of some 70% of deaths worldwide – and are now a major, growing cause of illness and premature death in low- and middle-income countries.

‘Worldwide, 41 million people die each year as a result of respiratory disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, mental disorders and other non-communicable diseases. This cannot continue,” said Norwegian Minister of International Development Dag-Inge Ulstein.

“Therefore, Norway will triple its assistance to fight NCDs, allocating over 200 million NOK to these agendas for 2020. This is just the start, we will step up the funding towards 2024,” said Ulstein.

Norwegian Minister of International Development, Dag Inge Ulstein

Speaking at a launch of the strategy in the Norwegian capital at a “Gathering for The Future of Global Health,” the minister noted the “strong upward trend” in the number of deaths from non-communicable diseases in countries at the lowest income levels.

“Tobacco, air pollution, alcohol, unhealthy food, lack of physical activity…These silent killers cause 70 percent of all premature and unnecessary deaths worldwide – yet the fight against them receives only 1 percent of the international development funding that goes to health. 70 percent – One percent,” said Ulstein.

“That has to change – and that is why we are here today. In Africa, the deaths from non communicable diseases are projected to increase from around 35%  to over 50% of total deaths by 2030. We are going the wrong way.”

NCDs often develop into chronic conditions, and when they are not treated or managed early enough, the result can be catastrophically high costs for individuals as well as health systems, he observed.

“If you cannot go to work – or plow your fields – there will be one less bread-winner in the house – and one less co-fighter in our collective quest to win the 2030 race to meet the SDGs,” he said.

Norway Asks Other Donors To Step Forward on NCDS
Norwegian Minister of Health, Bent Høie. (Photo: Stine Jenssen).

In launching the strategy, Norwegian officials were clear that they hope other high income countries which provide billions of dollars in international development assistance will also step forward and follow their example.

“No country until today has presented a programme on how to use development aid as a tool … to address the NCD epidemic. This is what makes this day so special,” said Norway’s Minister of Health, Bent Høie who co-hosted the strategy launch.

Referring to Norway’s longtime record of promoting health in development aid, he said that “this strategy will take it a step further, I urge other countries to follow up and develop their own NCD strategies for development assistance.”

Historically donor aid from high income countries has been used almost exclusively on communicable diseases, he noted, referring to the billions of dollars spent every year on global health programmes to fight AIDs, TB, malaria, other neglected infectious diseases, as well as to promote immunization.

Historically those programmes “corresponded to the disease burden and the biggest challenges in global health,” he noted, but, “today, this has changed.

“The NCDs are claiming far more lives than communicable diseases with many people dying prematurely. With this change in the disease burden, we need to change our priorities accordingly.”

WHO’s Bente Mikkelsen talks about the need for collaboration between health, finance, urban development, agriculture, food and pharma sectors to reduce NCDs, at the launch of the Norway’s NCD Strategy.

While some NCD treatments can be extremely expensive, others are “relatively cheap, like getting medication to lower blood pressure. But in many low income countries, this is out of reach,” he added.

“The [Norwegian] strategy recognizes these challenges and underlines the need to provide treatment based on universal health coverage. Primary health care is the basis.”

He noted that the strategy builds upon the 16 WHO-recommended Best Buys for preventing and controlling NCDs, which include comparably simple and inexpensive measures such as reduced salt and sugar intake and increasing physical exercise. The Best Buys were agreed upon by UN Member States at last year’s Third High Level UN Meeting on NCDs.

“If these were implemented, over 8 million lives could be saved annually by 2030,” Høie said, adding that according to WHO estimates, that would also lead to a savings of $US 7 trillion in low- and middle-income countries over the next 15 years.

Three-Pronged Strategy 

The new strategy has three main points of focus: Strengthening primary health care services: Prevention of leading NCD risk factors like air pollution, tobacco and alcohol consumption and unhealthy diets; Better data management and health information systems.

Strengthening Primary Healthcare Services as part of Universal Health Coverage.

Many NCD interventions, can be delivered effectively and affordably at primary health care level, with greater benefits to patients and savings for health systems.   Examples are checks for hypertension, diabetes, prevention of cervical cancer with HPV vaccination, as well as capacity for prevention and early diagnosis and treatment of mental health disorders in primary health services.  Norway will support the strengthening health services so that primary health care services are well-equipped to support NCD prevention, early diagnosis and treatment, as well as ensuring everyone has access to health services, subsidized in part, by the public authorities.

A woman gets her blood pressure measured to test for hypertension.
Preventing and reducing risks through intersectoral action, including regulation, taxation and other measures.

Norway will help to prevent non-communicable disease through development cooperation that contributes to healthy and sustainably produced food, a healthy environment with clean air and the consumption of clean energy, opportunities for physical activity, access to high-quality education and stronger tobacco and alcohol regulations. Emphasis shall be given to social sustainability and reducing health differences from childhood to old age.

In this context, Norway will also support countries requesting assistance to improve taxation and regulation of products that are harmful to health,  through its Tax for Development Programme (Skatt for utvikling). Such measures can be used to effectively discourage consumption of health-harmful products such as tobacco, alcohol, sugary drinks, saturated and trans fats, and encourage healthier alternatives.  Similarly, pollution taxes and regulations can encourage shifts to clean energy and transport, reducing health-harmful air pollution. These are all among the key risk factors contributing to NCDs, including cancer, hypertension and heart disease as well as obesity-related disease such as diabetes.

Unhealthy, unregulated street foods are commonly sold in low- and middle- income countries.
Strengthening data management, digitalization and other health information needs.  

The strategy also calls for assisting countries in developing better health information systems, to  improve access to health data critical to facilitating early stage NCD diagnosis, treatment; supporting NCD-related health norms and standards, as well as efforts to improve access to medical equipment and medication, particularly  in areas hit by crises and conflict.

Norway’s officials say that the strategy will support the SDG 3 goals of Universal Health Coverage (SDG 3.8) and reducing premature deaths from NCDs by one-third by 2030 (SDG 3.4), as well as the commitments reached at the Third UN High Level Meeting on NCDs  in 2018 as well as the recent UN High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage,” Høie added.

The strategy also supports other SDG 3 targets for reducing deaths and illness from hazardous chemicals and air pollution, as well as preventing and treating harmful use of alcohol.

Strategy Launched At Oslo “Gathering for Global Health” Event

Norway has become “the first in the world to launch a strategy to include non-communicable diseases in its international development policy,” said WHO’s Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in a videotaped message broadcast at the strategy “Gathering for Global Health” launch in Oslo on Friday.

Tore Godal

“Non-communicable diseases are the leading killers of our time. As is so often the case, the world’s poorest bear the heaviest burden,” the WHO Director-General added. “The risks of dying between the ages of 30 and 70 from a heart attack, stroke, diabetes, cancer or asthma are 4 times higher in most countries of Africa than in Norway.”

“You have anchored this strategy in the political declaration on NCDs and Universal Health Coverage, which were adopted this year and last year at the UN General Assembly.”

“And you have built it on the WHO Global Action Plans on NCDs and Mental Health and the WHO Best Buys. I appreciate the central role in the strategy of primary health care, both in preventing and managing NCDs.”

“Thank you for your leadership in this important area.  WHO is delighted to accept your invitation to be a co-sponsor of this strategy. Together we can ensure more people get the health services that they need for NCDs and for all their health needs.”

The launch event included Dr Tore Godal, as a guest of honor, celebrating Godal’s lifelong service to global health on behalf of the Norwegian government and the global community.

Godal, a special advisory on global health at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, compared today’s NCDs challenge to the battle against tobacco, which mobilized the global health community several decades ago and is still ongoing today. Like the fight against tobacco, we need a multi-pronged strategy including legal action, awareness and taxation to achieve meaningful progress,” he said.

 

A video describing the challenge of NCDs in low income countries here:

Image Credits: Twitter: @NorwayMFA, Stine Loe Jenssen, E Fletcher/HP-Watch, Twitter: @NorwayMFA.

Lelio Marmora is stepping down as Executive Director of Unitaid in March 2020, sources told Health Policy Watch. Marmora, who has led the organization since 2014, told staff on Monday that he would be leaving to seek “new challenges.”

His departure is not likely to bring “unexpected or drastic changes” to Unitaid’s funding priorities over the next few months, Unitaid Board Member for NGOs Fifa Rahman told Health Policy Watch. The organization has already set its strategy for the next two years, and has identified an acting ED committed to the same goals.

Rahman confirmed that Philippe Duneton, current deputy executive director of Unitaid, will step in as interim Executive Director. Duneton has been with the organization since its founding in 2006, and has taken on this role at least once before.

Lelio Marmora

Still, it will be important for Unitaid to find a new ED who understands the “unique role [of the organization] in funding change in how medicines are developed and made accessible for people,” Ellen ‘t Hoen, director of Medicines Law & Policy, told Health Policy Watch.

The director of Medicine Law & Policy, which provides legal and policy analysis on issues related to access to medicines and international law, further added that Unitaid is the only funder that explicitly focuses on thorny issues such as intellectual property.

Additionally, according to observers, Marmora did exert a strong influence over the organizational culture. While Marmora doubled the staff during his tenure, sources close to the organization told HPW that there was dissatisfaction among staff about the management style, and hopes that there would be some improvements.

Rahman told Health Policy Watch that the Board will be “monitoring risks” to ensure that any organizational change moves in a “positive direction.” She further added that the Board will be making a final decision on a new ED in 6-8 months.

The announcement was first made to Unitaid’s staff on Monday, and a second announcement was made by Marmora to the Board of Unitaid at the annual Board meeting on November 20-21. The announcement comes less than a month after Unitaid’s success in helping to negotiate a new deal with rifapentine drug manufacturer Sanofi to slash prices for the essential tuberculosis drug by up to 70% in 100 low- and middle-income countries. The volume-based deal between Unitaid, the Global Fund, and Sanofi was announced at the Union World Conference for Lung Health on October 31.

UNITAID’s Role in Global Health Financing

In its 13-year history, Unitaid has emerged as a major donor of upstream health product innovation and downstream access to medicines work in the “big 3” – HIV/AIDs, tuberculosis, and malaria. Among other projects, the organization funds access to medicines work around intellectual property and pharmaceutical innovation.

Notably, Unitaid does not have a United States representative on its board, which may be why the organization can fund work on controversial issues such as intellectual property and pharmaceutical development. Experts in access to medicines work further added that unlike the other, larger “big 3”-focused organization, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Unitaid is a much smaller and more nimble organization.

It has historically helped negotiate major deals to reduce antiretroviral drug prices and is currently the largest multilateral funder of tuberculosis research and development. Some of its major grantees include The South Centre, the Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative, the Stop TB Partnership, and the Foundation for Innovative Diagnostics (FIND). Unitaid also funds a significant portion of WHO’s Prequalification Programme, which provides international regulatory guidance on the safety and efficacy of new health products.

Initially formed by France, Brazil, Chile, the UK, and Norway at the height of the global HIV/AIDs crisis in 2006, Unitaid uses so-called “innovative financing” mechanisms to raise money for the “big three” – HIV/AIDs, tuberculosis, and malaria. As of 2019, the organization reports it has received some US$3 billion from donors, with 70% of its funding coming directly from a “solidarity levy” on airline tickets – a funding mechanism first piloted by France and since adopted by nine additional countries. Other member states earmark a portion of specific tax revenues for the organization, such as Norway, which contributes part of its carbon emissions tax revenue to Unitaid.

This article has been amended on November 23 to update Ellen ‘t Hoen’s name and title.

Image Credits: UN Photo/Rick Bajornas.

Over 80% of school-going adolescents worldwide get less than one hour of physical activity per day – leaving children at risk of poorer cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, bone and metabolic health, and slower cognitive development than their more active peers. The new study published Friday in the Lancet Child & Adolescent Health journal also found that girls are more likely to be insufficiently active than boys, and the gender gap is only widening in most countries.

“Urgent policy action to increase physical activity is needed now, particularly to promote and retain girls’ participation in physical activity,” says study author Dr Regina Guthold of the WHO in a press release.

The first-ever such study to analyze global trends for adolescent physical activity, Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants, was a massive undertaking funded by the World Health Organization and conducted by researchers from WHO, Imperial College London, and the University of Western Australia. The extensive study evaluated data collected annually between 2001 to 2016 on some 1.6 million 11 to 17-year-old students across 146 countries.

In 2016, Bangladesh had the lowest levels of insufficient activity in both boys and girls at 63% and 69% respectively, which the authors attribute to a strong focus on national sports like cricket, or societal factors like traditional gender roles. In contrast, the Philippines had the highest level of insufficient activity in boys at 93%, and South Korea had the highest levels of insufficient activity in girls at 97%.

In a third of the countries surveyed, the fraction of girls meeting the one-hour guideline for daily physical activity was more than ten percentage points lower than the percentage of boys meeting the recommendations, with the United States and Ireland seeing the biggest gaps. Between 2001 – 2016, the gender gap widened in almost three-quarters of the countries surveyed.

Global Gender Gap In Physical Activity Widening

The study found some 15% of girls and 22% of boys maintain the minimum WHO-recommended level of daily activity, and in all but four countries, girls were less active in boys.

And the gap is widening. Globally, the proportion of boys being sufficiently active actually slightly increased from 20% to 22% between 2001 and 2016, but there was no global change in the proportion of girls getting the minimum amount of daily physical activity. The global trend is largely reflected at the country level as well, with some countries experiencing a huge increase in the proportion of boys getting enough physical activity, but little change in the proportion of girls getting enough daily exercise. Interestingly, the study found that the gender gap is growing more in high-income countries.

“The trend of girls being less active than boys is concerning,” said study co-author Leanne Riley, WHO. “More opportunities to meet the needs and interests of girls are needed to attract and sustain their participation in physical activity through adolescence and into adulthood.”

As a case study, the country with the starkest gender difference in physical activity levels is the United States, where approximately 36% of all boys but less than 20% of girls were sufficiently active in 2016. The authors posit that good physical education in schools, pervasive media coverage of sports and availability of sports clubs may have contributed to the increase in the proportion of boys exercising, but girls were not getting the same benefits.

To increase physical activity for young people, governments need to identify and address the many causes and inequities – social, economic, cultural, technological, and environmental – that can perpetuate the differences between boys and girls, the authors said.

Countering Insufficient Activity Among Adolescents

WHO recommends that adolescents do moderate or vigorous physical activity for at least an hour every day. However, the sobering results from the study show that few adolescents actually meet the daily minimum for all types of physical activity – including time spent in active play, recreation and sports, active domestic chores, walking and cycling, or other types of active transportation, physical education or planned exercise.

At current rates of change, the global target of a 15% relative reduction in insufficient physical activity by 2030 – a  goal set by all Member States at the 71st World Health Assembly – will not be achieved.

To improve levels of physical activity among adolescents, the study recommends that:

  • Known effective policies and programmes to increase physical activity in adolescents be scaled up, rather than scaled back.
  • Multisectoral action to create new opportunities for young people to be active, involving education, urban planning, road safety and others.

“Countries must develop or update their policies and allocate the necessary resources to increase physical activity,” said Dr Bull. She added that policy-makers should aim to increase all forms of physical activity through “physical education that develops physical literacy, more sports, active play and recreation opportunities,” as well as invest in providing “safe environments so young people can walk and cycle independently.”

But ultimately, she noted, comprehensive action requires engagement with multiple sectors and stakeholders, including schools, families, sport and recreation providers, urban planners, and city and community leaders.

Image Credits: WHO, Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants.

Incarcerated people suffer from poorer health outcomes and limited access to health care, which can impact them and their communities even after release. However, prisoners’ health is not being monitored well, and there is a lack of evidence to inform policy making to improve the health of prison populations.

These are the main findings of a new study, “Status report on prison health in the WHO European Region,” released Thursday by the World Health Organization European Regional Office. The study collated data from the 53 countries of the WHO European Region collected between 2016-2017 that was reported in WHO’s Health in Prisons European Database (HIPED), launched in January 2018. It notes that a variety of the 90 health indicators in HIPED, such as infectious disease prevalence in prisons, were underreported, and little or no data on the prison population was available for about a fourth of the countries in the Region.

“We only have data from 39 countries, but the data that we have indicate an enormous difference in the general health of people in prison compared to those in the outside world,” said Dr Carina Ferreira-Borges, programme manager for Alcohol and Illicit Drugs at WHO EURO, in a press release.

In the countries that did report, the study found that the overall mortality rate in prisons is 45 per 10,000 individuals, substantially higher than the general mortality rate in the population of 27 per 10,000 individuals, although the reasons for the contrast are unclear.

The report notes that over 1.5 million people are incarcerated in the region each year, and rates of recidivism can be high, causing individuals to shuttle back and forth between disjointed community and prison health systems. Additionally, for those who suffer from addiction or mental health disorders, the risk of suicide, self-harm and drug overdose is high in the early days of a person’s release.

“A prison sentence takes away a person’s liberty; it should not also take away their health and their right to health,” said Dr Bente Mikkelsen, director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-course at WHO EURO.

Outside of individual considerations, poor health access in prisons can impact the wider community once an incarcerated person is released; some prisons experience overcrowding, and infectious diseases can spread quickly in such settings, the report notes. The report found that resources for the prevention of infectious diseases are “not universally available” across European prison health systems, with some countries reporting such resources are entirely unavailable. A full vaccination course for hepatitis B is available in only 31% of the Member States in the study.

“A large proportion of people in prison return to the community every year, so viewing prison as a setting for public health opens an opportunity for public health actions and for improving health literacy to support and protect vulnerable populations,” said Mikkelsen.

According to the report, prisons can be seen as settings in which health interventions can address existing health conditions and contribute to positive lifestyles and behaviour changes. Time in prison can also be used to improve people’s skills to help them find a job after release and reintegrate into society.

“The prison population, with its disproportionate disease burden, is one that cannot be forgotten in WHO’s pursuit of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. To achieve universal health coverage and better health and well-being for all, as in WHO’s vision, it is vital that prisons are seen as a window of opportunity to change lifestyles and ensure that no one is left behind,” said Mikkelsen.

Limited Availability of Health Care, Health Promotion, and Health Data

The report notes that access to key health care or health-promoting services can be limited in prison settings:

  • Of the 37 countries with national data available, 97% reported that meal production of meals in prisons occurs in centralized kitchens, and 38% reported self-cook kitchens are available. Some 50% of countries reported fresh food is available in prison.
  • Of the member states reporting, 14% do not screen for severe mental health disorders on or close to reception, and 41% do not screen for harmful use of alcohol on reception.
  • Of the 36 countries that provided data on treatment for mental health and substance use disorders, 97% reported specialist mental health support is available. In 35 countries that reported on these indicators, opioid substitute therapy is available in 81% of 35 countries, and only 51% have guidelines on preventing post-release drug-related deaths.

However, the authors note that the limited availability of data makes it difficult to draw more specific conclusions about the health of prison populations. The report found that monitoring and surveillance systems for health in prisons are generally poor, and this affects the development of evidence-based policies that effectively target the needs of the prison population.

“Collecting this data is essential to enable the integration of prison health policies into the broader public health agenda benefiting the entire society,” said Ferreira-Borges.

Image Credits: Council of Europe.

Global leaders pledged US$2.6 billion to the global fight to eradicate polio at the Reaching the Last Mile (RLM) forum in Abu Dhabi on Tuesday, just one day ahead of World Children’s Day. The commitment fulfills part of the first phase of funding requested by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative to finance their 2019 – 2023 Polio Endgame Strategy – leaving a gap of some US$670 million.

The pledging event comes on the heels of a major announcement last month that the world has eradicated two of the three wild poliovirus strains, leaving only wild poliovirus type 1 (WPV1) still in circulation. Additionally, Nigeria – the last country in Africa to have cases of wild polio – has not seen wild polio since 2016 and the entire WHO African region could be certified wild polio-free in 2020, leaving Pakistan and Afghanistan as the last two countries where wild polio still circulates.

A child receives an oral polio vaccine in India.

“From supporting one of the world’s largest health workforces, to reaching every last child with vaccines, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative is not only moving us closer to a polio-free world, it’s also building essential health infrastructure to address a range of other health needs,” said World Health Organization Director-General and Chair of the Polio Oversight Board Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in a press release.

The commitments are critical to continue the momentum of the decades-long polio eradication effort. Barriers to reaching every child – including inconsistent campaign quality, insecurity, conflict, massive mobile populations, and, in some instances, parental refusal to the vaccine – have led to ongoing transmission of the last wild poliovirus strain in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Furthermore, gaps in vaccination coverage in parts of Africa and Asia have resulted in unimmunized children have sparked outbreaks of a rare, vaccine-derived form of the virus.

Pledges came from a variety of donors, such as the host of the pledging moment, His Highness Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, who pledged US$160 million. Commitments also came from classic bilateral donors and the last key countries of the polio campaign, including US $215.92 million from the United States, US$160 million from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, US$105.05 million from Germany, US$84.17 million from the Federal Government of Nigeria, and US$10.83 million from Norway.

Other pledges came from philanthropic organizations and the private sector, such as a $US 1.08 billion commitment from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, US$150 million from Rotary International, and US$50 million from Bloomberg Philanthropies.

The pledges will not just go towards fighting polio, they will also help fund resources and infrastructure built by the GPEI that can support other health needs. In addition to delivering polio vaccines, polio workers deliver Vitamin A supplements, provide other vaccines like those for measles and yellow fever, counsel new mothers on breastfeeding, and help strengthen disease surveillance systems to anticipate and respond to outbreaks.

Image Credits: Jean-Marc Giboux/Rotary International.

Efforts to eliminate river blindness, a debilitating parasitic disease that causes vision loss in 1.15 million people, may be threatened by another infection known as African eye worm, according to a modelling study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases. While the World Health Organization has set a target to eliminate river blindness in most African countries in the next five years, the study predicts that 4 million people living in areas with African eye worm will still be at risk of the blinding disease in 2025, threatening almost four decades of elimination efforts.

The study, co-authored by researchers from Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam in the Netherlands, and the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative, also predicts that 90% of these people will live in areas currently not covered by treatment programmes for river blindness.

A villager’s eyes are being examined for African eye worm by Dr Philippe Urwotho, a medical doctor and Provincial Coordinator of the DRC’s Neglected Tropical Disease National Programme.

Elimination of river blindness, also known as onchocerciasis, is mainly reliant on a strategy of “mass drug administration,” whereby entire communities living in endemic areas are given a safe and effective drug called ivermectin regularly in order to prevent the parasitic disease from progressing or spreading. Ivermectin only targets the juvenile worms that can cause blindness or severe chronic skin itching, so mass drug administration needs to be repeated for the full life span of the adult parasite – 10 to 12 years – to fully eliminate the parasite from a community.

The problem arises when communities live in areas with both the river blindness parasite and the African eye worm, or Loa loa – people who have a high number of Loa loa larvae in their blood are at risk of life-threatening complications if they receive ivermectin. As a result, ivermectin cannot be safely used in mass drug administration campaigns in areas co-endemic for both diseases, and river blindness treatment programmes in these areas have not started.

“The current approach to preventing river blindness based on mass drug administration of ivermectin has been extraordinarily successful,’ says Sabine Specht, Head of Filarial Clinical Programme at DNDi, in a press release. “But alternative treatment strategies will be needed if we want to eliminate the disease, including the development of entirely new tools that offer a rapid and safe cure for river blindness.”

The authors predict that in 2025, there will still be at least 31,000 individuals infected with onchocerciasis and unable to use ivermectin, due to the high load of  Loa loa worms in their bloodstream – as the current treatment regimens for co-infected people are not well adapted for use in the field. According to the study, there are also currently no safe medications that can be used to kill adult forms of the worms that cause river blindness. The authors highlight that the lack of existing field-friendly treatments and diagnostics for both diseases merit further R&D for both diseases.

River blindness is transmitted by the bite of infected blackflies, which live near fast-moving rivers. The disease can progress to severe itching, skin lesions, and eventual blindness. Before large-scale control campaigns began in the mid-1970s, whole villages would eventually go blind from the disease. In 2017, it was estimated that 14.6 million people infected with onchocerciasis had severe chronic itching and skin disease, and 1.15 million had vision loss.

African eye worm, or Loa loa, gets its name from its most infamous tell-tale sign: the visible passing of the Loa loa worm through the eye. While previously thought to be rather mild, recent studies show that Loa loa infection can cause severe illness such as cardiac fibrosis, encephalopathy, and neurological or psychiatric disorders.

Image Credits: DNDi.

Italy’s former Undersecretary of State for Health, Armando Bartolazzi, discusses the implications of recent moves to replace the head of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), based on political considerations of the a new Health Minister.  

“Health is a Political Choice” said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros in his keynote session at the World Health Summit, Berlin, 29 October 2019.

I fully support this statement. However, what about Health Officials?

There is a long tradition in Italy of politicians appointing key health officials for the National Health System (NHS). However, I was part of an initiative in 2018 to change that system and ensure that key appointments in the health system were based on technical experience and merit, rather than political connections.  Now, that initiative may be reversed by the new Health Minister, Roberto Speranza – to the detriment of the Italian public as well Italy’s image in international health leadership.

In February 2018, just before the general political elections, I was approached by top representatives of the fast-rising 5 Stars Movement to discuss my possible involvement within the government if the movement won the elections. I had a positive impression from Luigi Di Maio, the soon-to-become Vice Prime Minister when we met in front of the hospital where I worked in Rome. The message was crystal clear: “please help us to promote and guarantee that meritocracy, expertise and competence become the only criteria behind the appointments of high-level managers in the health sector”.

Armando Bartolazzi, former Italian Underscretary of State for Health

The 5 Stars Movement did win the elections shortly thereafter, and I took on the role of Undersecretary of State for Health for the new Government, between June 2018 and August 2019. I immediately started working to use a different approach in selecting top health officials.

The first selection coming up was that of the Director General of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Based on my professional experience at the Karolinska Institute of Stockholm, Sweden, I proposed to the Health Minister Giulia Grillo to use a blind international selection process, something well established abroad, but never used before in Italy, instead of the classical Italian selection process known as “concorso” which generally doesn’t guarantee an independent judgment based on meritocracy, but fits very well with the pre-defined political inclinations of ministers in charge.

Around 100 CVs were received. Three independent international experts, including Sir Andrew Dillon, one of the most prominent experts in the pharmaceutical sector, were recruited to screen out the candidates and make their recommendations.

After three independent evaluations, Dr Luca Li Bassi, then head of a health sector strengthening initiative at the International Atomic Energy Agency, was finally included among the top candidates.

This was based on his strong and wide experience related to medicines assessment, procurement, access and delivery in numerous international agencies, including the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria. These activities had led to concrete achievements influencing national as well as global markets and achieving impressive results when addressing major challenges in this sector. With an MD from Milan University, and degrees in both Management and Public Health obtained in New Zealand, Dr Li Bassi made a convincing final interview with the Minister. No one in the Ministry knew him directly and he did not know any of us, considering that he had spent most of his professional career abroad, working in three different continents for the previous 25 years.

With this process, we had effectively started a new approach, based on the principle that making health a “political choice” also must include choosing to free up the National Health System from political influences when selecting its top management.

It includes recognizing that better health for people, Universal Health Access and greater health gains based on available resources cannot have a political colour – but need to be anchored in professional, evidenced-based decisions, and in the case of medicines regulation are also among the most technical issues faced by health policymakers. We explained this principle in a letter published in The Lancet and were proud to have made this change for the first time in our country, where the inequalities in the health system are still growing. This may arguably also be attributed to the various political influences at local, regional and national level that are diverting health investments to other political interests, regardless of the best interests of their constituents.

A New Approach Brings Results    

Key achievements reached by AIFA in the past year are quite clear for any outsider. A few weeks after his nomination, the new DG Li Bassi, was able to negotiate the core of the historic agreement with the Italian pharma lobby group (Farmindustria) that unlocked € 2.4 billion for the national health system, a deal that had been awaited since 2013!

He then went on to negotiate consensus among 192 World Health Assembly (WHA) Member States on what the  Chair of Committee A had declared to be “the most contentious issue in global health” with adoption last May of the WHA Transparency Resolution [Improving the transparency of markets for medicines, vaccines and other products].

I witnessed his hard work arguing on technical grounds with delegations from all over the world, and I was honoured to speak in the Plenary of the Assembly and receive the chilling applause and hugs of hundreds of delegates.

Luca Li Bassi holding Italy’s placard at the 72nd World Health Assembly with other lead co-sponsors of the WHA Transparency Resolution.

It was an historic moment – more so since Italy has never been able to take a leadership role before in the World Health Assembly.

At national level, he then successfully raised the issue of medicines shortages, implementing measures that have since been taken up as examples by other EU countries, such as the need for national stockpiling, longer advance notices by producers, and export bans and penalties in case of lack of supply, all focused to protect public health.

As a matter of fact, I note that nobody was talking about the emergencies caused for many national health systems by shortages in the international fora only 6 months ago, while now this has become a priority issue in the European Union. It was also declared a priority by the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) at its last summit, which was hosted for the first time in Rome last month at the behest of the AIFA DG.

In addition, Li Bassi led AIFA to negotiate under an innovative “payment for results” scheme, the reimbursement of expensive new CAR-T technologies for treatment of leukaemia (and likely other type of cancers in the near future) making finance for such treatments sustainable for the NHS, and rewarding the suppliers only when the treatment is successful.

In order to make sure that this technology is effectively adopted by the NHS, AIFA also gathered experts nationally and internationally to discuss how the Ministry could invest in independent facilities that in the future will be able to develop production capacity in public “cell factories” around the country. The Ministry has now decided to allocate €60 million for the next year on this project, another visionary move that would not have been possible without the catalysing efforts of AIFA.

Back to Politics Again in the New Italian Government?

With the new government coming into power as result of the political crisis last August, Italy now has a new Health Minister, Roberto Speranza, representing a small party from the far left (Article One). With his decision to announce the recruitment of a new DG in AIFA, he has effectively given into the principle of awarding this sensitive position to someone based on his politics, rather than professional skills. This will also bring to the national regulatory authority for medicines, a highly technical and supposedly independent agency, the third DG in three years.

Yes, health is a “political choice” – But as health professionals, our aspirations and concrete accomplishments in delinking politics from management of the health system has been trashed at a blink of an eye. Most importantly, all the ground-breaking work that has been done by AIFA under the current leadership over the past year both in the national as well as international fora is threatened. It could  vanish, or in the best case suffer delays, ultimately to the detriment of people’s health.

It is obviously the right and responsibility of any new Minister to revise priorities and indicate objectives. It is the role of health managers as the technical and operational arm of the NHS to then implement those objectives, and to become accountable against these new priorities, in terms of performance.

So why not take such approach, giving AIFA’s current DG the opportunity to respond and be accountable? Where is the need to go back to the old logic of political appointments and appointees?

What can a political element provide to technical work that has not been delivered in the past year? Why do meritocracy and competence have to be traded off with politics? As an example, the head of the European Medicines Agency does not normally change after the EU elections and the establishment of a new Commission, was was just experienced recently.

As a health professional myself, I doubt that the decision taken by the new Minister is the best line of action for the interest of patients and the public-at-large. Italy’s NHS needs good managers, strong leaders in the global arena and undisputed focus on the best interests of the whole community that it is supposed to serve.

___________________________________

Armando Bartolazzi, MD, is an oncologist-pathologist by training. He served as former Italian Undersecretary of State for Health between June 2018  and August 2019. He is currently Professor of Pathology (first level Dirigente) at Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy, and Research Associate at the Department of Pathology-Oncology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Since 1987 he has worked in the field of cancer research and diagnosis

 

 

 

 

Image Credits: @Armando Bartolaz, HP-Watch/E Fletcher.