MMV CEO David Reddy talks about the steps MMV is taking to support a new generation of malaria research leadership, promote more gender-sensitive malaria treatment and fast-track innovation on new malaria combination therapies. This follows a string of MMV successes over the past two decades in fostering new paediatric malaria treatments, new combination therapies to fight drug resistance and a breakthrough single-dose treatment, tafenoquine, for the relapsing form of malaria.

Health Policy Watch: You are celebrating the 20th anniversary of MMV’s creation. It was also one of the first non-profit “product development partnerships (PDP)” to be created, involving both industry and public sector actors in malaria R&D. How did MMV come about, and what gap has it filled in the R&D landscape?

David Reddy: MMV was formed in 1999, out of a WHA discussion with African leaders who were worried that there was more parasite resistance developing [to existing malaria drugs] and not enough R&D being done on new treatments, effectively there was a market failure.

It came out of the forward-thinking people in Industry and WHO, and incubated at the TDR, the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases.

Today we have a broad partner network, including some 26 pharma partners, both innovators and generic producers, as well as research and academic institutions, governments, international organizations, NGOs and non-profits, and clinical trial centres in endemic countries.

For the past two decades, MMV has been leading the development of new antimalarial treatments, supporting expansion of R&D capacity in malaria-endemic countries, and working to ensure access to antimalarial treatment by the world’s most neglected populations.

HP-Watch: We have heard you recently speak about how MMV had its roots in industry, while Drugs for Neglected Disease Initiative DNDi), had its roots in civil society activism – but you both have gotten to a similar place in your development. Can you talk a little more about that?

Reddy: Well, I compare it to the blue whale and the whale shark.  On the evolutionary tree, DNDI and MMV started from different places, but we are addressing the same underlying issues in the drug development ecosystem – market failure. In addition, we at MMV, we focus solely on malaria whereas DNDi’s remit is wider in terms of neglected tropical diseases.

Because of where we came from, we started from a strong R&D base; there were a lot of people from industry who became part of MMV.  So, I think we were positioned very well in terms of being able to get industry to contribute to the model.  Additionally, I have led teams [while at Roche] that had developed drugs with regulators, so I also know that mindset. And in fact, the regulators are quite agnostic about whether the innovation comes from industry or a non-profit group – the same rules apply.

HP-Watch: There has been a lot of discussion recently about the importance of insuring for wide access to treatments up front. When MMV engages with the private sector or others. What’s MMV’s approach on that, and how is it similar or different to others?

Reddy: In every agreement we have with our partners, we build in access and affordability clauses.  Those include two elements: a commitment to make the drug available and affordable in malaria-endemic countries.  We generally define what that means and in the context of affordability we have enforcement clauses, as well. If a partner doesn’t live up to those obligations, we can take action, such as moving manufacturing capacity across to another partner.

HP-Watch: Is there a motive for pharma to participate if the costs are kept low?

Reddy: Because of the sheer volume of the malaria drugs that need to be provided, [there is still an incentive]. It is a real challenge for other disease areas, where the populations are smaller. For some of our partners, the motive is corporate social responsibility. Others take a no-profit, no loss approach. Incentives such as the US FDA Priority Review Voucher programme can be important.  A partner can use a voucher (awarded upon approval of a new neglected disease treatment to get a rapid approval of another drug in a profitable disease area, where a six-month time to market advantage is worth a considerable amount of money.  And once the vouchers have been issued, they can also be transferred and sold. These kinds of benefits do help tip the balance of the pharma companies participating in this area.

HP-Watch:  Can you briefly summarize the 3-4 biggest breakthroughs you have experienced in drug development – up to the recent approval of the new drug tafenoquine – and their meaning for public health?

A health worker dispenses a child-friendly formulation of Coartem®, MMV’s first paediatric malaria treatment.

The first breakthrough was the product we co-developed with Novartis, that was a child-friendly version of their antimalarial drug, Coartem®, [the first artemisinin-combination therapy]. In less than ten years since launch, some 385 million courses of that treatment have been delivered.  This is a key success since most people who die from malaria are children under 5 years of age. And yet children are among the last to get [paediatric formulations of] medicines [due to the sensitivity of clinical trials involving children]. So, this was really important.”

Pyramax® (pyronaridine-artesunate), is another ACT – based on the drug pyrimidine, that has shown some nice activity in areas where resistance has been seen.

Testing for malaria (P. vivax) parasites in Brazil, the first malaria-endemic country to approve the first GSK and MMV co-developed treatment for relapsing malaria.

This is a particularly important development programme because we are working with a generic company, Shin Poong in South Korea, and they formed a joint team with us.  We were able to bring our knowledge of drug development and the malaria space to them and help bridge the gap between generic companies and innovators. So, it was a capacity development journey for them and for us it was useful in getting the product on the market.

Then, just last year, tafenoquine, which was developed in partnership with GSK and is a single dose cure for the relapsing form of malaria (caused by the Plasmodium vivax parasite), which in some patients can replace 14 days of treatment with the currently used drug. Tafenoquine was approved by the US FDA and Australian TGA. It has also just been approved by the Brazilian regulatory authorities.

 

A child receives injectable artesunate for severe malaria, a formulation that MMV is helping generic manufacturers produce.

In addition, we are supporting generic manufacturers to produce quality-assured variations of rectal artesunate and injectable artesunate, [for immediate treatment of severe malaria episodes]. This was massively important in terms of getting these products onto the WHO Pre-Qualification list, [which undertakes a stringent review and can be a pathway for approval by national regulatory agencies]. For the injectables alone, some 144 million vials have been shipped since 2011, and we estimate that has saved 950,000 more lives in comparison to the alternative treatment, injectable quinine – if people were even to receive that at all. For the suppositories, some 3.2 million have been shipped since 2017, and we estimate about 300,000 lives have been saved.

HP-Watch: What about malaria resistance… how serious a threat is that, where and what is MMV doing about it?

Reddy: There is resistance being seen with some of the ACTs – current first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria. o\On that basis, we are developing, with Novartis, a new combination of novel compound ganaplacide with a new formulation lumefantrine. This is a non-artemisinin-based combination, which is what we need to be looking for, with a new mechanism of action against resistant parasite forms. It is in Phase 2b studies, and we are hoping it could be a one- or two-day therapy. That would provide a big benefit, in terms of its utility because one of the big challenges that we have seen with the ACTs [which have a 3-dose regimen] is that while people will take the first and second dose, there is a tendency for people to hold back on that last day of dosing, if they are feeling better, thinking that they can save the pill until the next child gets sick. And that fosters resistance.

Resistance is something that needs to be taken really, really seriously, we have seen it in each of the malaria drugs that have been developed, which is why using them in combination is so important.

So, we are trying to pursue an approach where multiple approaches for first-line therapy are available in every country, keeps the pressure on the parasite. Secondly, we are trying to develop new combinations with new mechanisms of action, like the Novartis project I just mentioned. Towards this end, there were 5 biological targets – ways we could hit the parasite – 20 years ago. Today there are 25 targets, and this can give rise to entirely new drugs; a number of them are already in clinical development.

Malaria parasite (blue-left) attaches to a human red blood cell (red-right)

We see the parasites being resistant to the drugs, we see the mosquitoes becoming resistant to the insecticides. We even see the parasites developing a form of resistance to the rapid tests that we use to identify them. In some of the tests, they had worked out a way to escape the test, by deleting a part of their genome that gave rise to a protein used by the rapid test to detect them. This multi-layered counter-offensive is something as a biologist that I have never seen.

The threat of resistance is compounded by other regional or global changes.  For instance, with climate change you get flooding, destruction of infrastructure that reverses the development progress that has been made. The other challenge is political instability, you can see that in the resurgence of malaria in Venezuela.

HP-Watch: The theme of malaria “eradication” has been much in the news, with some agencies saying it’s feasible and WHO saying that the elimination agenda first must get back on track. What’s your view?

Reddy: There were two reports on this topic that were launched a few months ago, one was by the Lancet Commission and one was by the WHO Strategic Advisory Group on Malaria Eradication (SAGEme).  Both effectively came to the same conclusion, which was that eradication should be our objective.  The WHO report [also] said that there is no biological impediment for why it cannot be achieved. But we will need new interventions.

I believe in the feasibility of eradication. What it requires is systematic elimination from countries and regions, as we have done it in Europe and North America. [It also requires a change in mindset], because many people have this inherent belief that the countries in Africa are locked into malaria.

Hans Rosling, in his book Factfulness said that countries in Africa have developed beyond most people’s understanding, at a strong pace. African countries are showing strong ownership of the concept of eradication and they are putting resources behind it. We have seen enormous progress in pushing back malaria, and a number of countries are on the cusp of elimination of malaria [as a public health risk]. But in other countries, we need to do more, including getting more real time data on what is working and what is not.  Groups such as USAID Presidents Malaria Initiative, the Global Fund and the Gates Foundation are really putting processes in in place to get better real time access to data that is needed. And part of it is up to us, to bring a new generation of medicines forward for prevention and treatment. We have made enormous progress; we have entirely new ways of attacking the parasite. Now it’s a matter of getting innovations through development and into the hands of clinics and patients.

HP-Watch: Some critics have accused the health sector of abandoning vector control, including environmentally-friendly measures such as better management of water resources and housing (e.g. screening) as modes of “treatment”, which can also reduce reliance on chemicals, and therefor vector resistance to chemical tools.

Reddy: I think vector control is being addressed from a different angle, the developmental angle.  We do see significant developmental progress and there will be a positive collateral effect on malaria. The Zero Malaria Starts with Me [a continent-wide campaign to eliminate malaria], begun by Senegal, is about communities; it is ensuring that trash is cleaned up, etc. I think the zero malaria starts with me is a good starting point.  But I agree that if we want to address malaria and really beat it, it is a belt and braces approach, we shouldn’t be throwing out any interventions without a thorough assessment.

HP-Watch: What about R&D costs, a subject in the news recently.  Do you have any assessment of the costs to bring a new or adapted drug to market?

MMV and partners have implemented a series of platforms to gather data to feed into a tool to allow unbiased prioritization of optimal drug combinations for further research.

Reddy: The overall costs for development of a malaria drug is about $US 100 million.  The fully loaded costs are probably in the region of $US 200 million. If we pay a dollar, the pharma pays a dollar plus in-kind contribution such as their facilities.  This is not including drug attrition. But since we have a strong system of pre-clinical assays, we can kill drugs pretty early.

Today, we have a strong network of SCID (severe combined immune deficiency) mice assays that allow you to test drug or drug combinations very quickly. [at a later stage] We can also run tests on healthy human volunteers infected with very small amounts of malaria parasites before it becomes clinical, you can treat them [with the experimental drug], and then you can treat them with the standard drugs, so that in a very, very controlled setting you can explore your drugs, are they going to work, and the likely dose you can use with patients. This keeps costs down and speeds things up.

HP-Watch: What challenges lie ahead, and do you see MMV continuing to address malaria only, or could there be other targets for your work?

Reddy: I think there is a real acknowledgement that it is not the current generation of leadership that will finish this job, and that includes me.  We need to be looking for that next generation of leadership and scientists. Much of that leadership is going to be coming from the malaria endemic countries.  So, our work on empowering needs to be rooted in the Malaria endemic countries.

MMV will be focusing on developing better treatments for pregnant women in the coming years

We will be looking more closely at groups such as pregnant women, who are disproportionately affected by malaria.  Yet in drug development programmes, pregnant women are classed as a vulnerable population, and therefore [in the traditional R&D mindset] you protect them from new drugs. [But that leads to us not having adequate drugs for women in pregnancy]. We are all realizing that we have been thinking about this in completely the wrong way, and so we need to see how we can get them included in studies so that they can benefit from new drugs earlier. We need to create a stronger programmatic stream [around malaria in women/pregnancy] if we are going to change things and move towards more equitable access.

Finally, new malaria combination drugs are going to become more and more important in order to avoid resistance.  So, we are launching a “malaria drug development catalyst” [initiative].  This is a unique way of bringing partners together at an earlier stage of development, to look at what drugs can be combined.

With out partners, we have already developed the technical tools, such as mouse assays and human volunteer studies, that allow us to perform tests in a consistent way. All partners can access the molecules, and the molecules can be put through the same assays, so that you can do an apples to apples comparison and see which molecules work best.

As with the assays, we want to create a common way of doing assessments and common agreements with the different companies and partners, so that it is easier for them to work with us and together. This is becoming very important now because we have a number of new drugs coming up through the pipeline. So, it is one of those perfect moments in time when everything comes together, and this is a way of formalizing and accelerating things.

 

This story is part of a series supported by MMV on malaria innovation.___________________________________

About David Reddy: Prior to joining MMV, in 2010, Reddy was a Vice President at Roche Pharmaceuticals, in Basel, Switzerland. With 20 years of management experience in the healthcare industry includes: successful leadership of drug development teams; licensing and alliance management; market analytics and business planning; product and disease area management; and interfacing with Governments, NGOs and patient advocacy groups in priority disease areas including HIV/AIDS and pandemic influenza. He has a doctorate in Cellular and Molecular Biology from the University of Auckland, New Zealand and completed a Post-Doctoral fellowship in molecular neurobiology at the Friedrich-Miescher Institute in Basel Switzerland.

 

Image Credits: Anna Wang/MMV, Novartis, Ben Moldenhauer/MMV, NIAID, NIH, MMV, Elizabeth Poll/MMV.

The number of Ebola cases per week has plateaued at a low, but consistent, count of 19 per week in the past 21 days, but the violent death of a radio journalist who had won acclaim for his Ebola outreach work has responders remaining vigilant. One Ebola case was also detected this week at a newly opened point-of-entry between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda, highlighting a continued risk of regional spread.

The attack in Ituri province on Papy Mumbere Mahamba, just after he had completed a broadcast for a community radio station in Lwemba, left him mortally wounded, his spouse critically injured with multiple wounds, and his house in razed to the ground according to a statement released by the DRC Ministry of Health and the WHO African Regional Office as well as other eyewitness and media accounts. While the exact motives for Mahamba’s murder remained unclear, community members said he was a host for a popular local radio show that had been a vehicle for raising awareness about Ebola.

“We are saddened and deeply shocked to hear about the death of community health worker and journalist, Papy Mumbere Mahamba who was helping tackle Ebola in the DRC. Our condolences to his family and loved ones. Humanitarians are not a target,” said Jamie LeSueur, emergency operations manager for the International Federation of the Red Cross in Africa and head of its DRC Ebola operation.

Since January of this year, WHO has documented more than 300 attacks on health workers, which have resulted in at least 6 deaths and 70 injuries of staff and patients. The Lwemba Health Area has been particularly volatile, with Ebola response activities previously suspended there for more than two weeks in September due to violence in response to the death of a local healthcare worker by Ebola.

Both WHO and the MoH condemned the attack on Mahamba in a statement, saying, “Any act of violence against individuals involved with the response is unacceptable and compromises the ability of health workers to provide assistance to communities impacted by the devastating effects of Ebola.”

Local journalists from Butembo and Lwemba (left) in a press conference with David Gressly (right) days after the death of their colleague, Papy Mumbere Mahamba.

UNESCO, which tracks murders of journalists, also condemned the brutal killing of the local radio host, with Director-General Audrey Azoulay calling it a “tragic illustration of the cost to society that violence against the media represents.”

Local news outlets have been important communication channels in the outbreak response, leveraging their reach to spread key messages that sensitize communities to Ebola response activities. Just days after Mahamba’s death, local journalists were back at work, telling UN Emergency Ebola Coordinator at a press conference that “the best way to pay tribute to our Papy Mahamba is to continue his struggle.”

As insecurity continues to plague the Ebola response as the level of access to affected communities in rural, hard-to-reach areas continues to fluctuate, WHO recommends interpreting the low weekly case incidence with caution.

Some 54 confirmed cases of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) were reported from North Kivu and Ituri provinces over the past 21 days, leading to an average of 19 cases per week, although case counts fluctuate daily. Some 31% of cases originated from Mabalako health zone and 39% of the cases were located in Mandima health zone, with 83% of all cases traceable back to Mandima’s Biakato Mines Health Area. The remaining 10 cases were linked to known contacts in the other health areas.

With insecurity plaguing the response and increased movement between the health zones, responders are concerned that the virus could be reintroduced into previously cleared areas or brought to new, unaffected regions. Approximately half of the cases reported in the past 21 days were located outside of the health zone where they had gotten infected.

The risk of the outbreak spilling over into other countries was a primary reason WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhomyn Ghebreyesus decided last month to keep the DRC outbreak designated a “public health emergency of international concern.” A WHO analysis of population movement shows that people continue to travel from outbreak hotspots such as Mambasa DRC over the border into Uganda. An Ebola case was identified while attempting to cross a newly opened port-of-entry into Uganda. Since a regional Ebola preparedness plan was announced in September, new reinforcement activities have been conducted to prevent the outbreak from spreading across borders, including scaling up EVD testing capabilities near the border on the DRC side.

 

Image Credits: Twitter: @davidgressly.

In a move fraught with international political overtones, Italy’s new Minister of Health is moving to replace the Director General of the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA), Dr Luca Li Bassi, who was the key architect of the May World Health Assembly (WHA) resolution supporting greater price transparency in medicines markets, Health Policy Watch has learned.

The potential replacement of Li Bassi, a seasoned career public health professional, comes only a year after he was selected to fill the top civil service position at AIFA in an international, juried competition.

Luca Li Bassi holding Italy’s placard at the 72nd World Health Assembly with other lead co-sponsors of the WHA Transparency Resolution.

The move against Li Bassi has stirred protest among civil society drug access groups, which this week sent an open letter to the new Italian Health Minister, Dr Roberto Speranza asking him to reconsider the move.

The petition, signed by 21 organizations and about two dozen leading medicines access advocates, follows the publication last week on Italy’s Ministry of Health’s website of a call for applications for the position of director-general of AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco).

The advertisement for a replacement for Li Bassi follows a September reshuffle in the Italian government whereby the left-wing Italian Article One party, in which Speranza is a leader, joined the Five Star party in the national government. As a reward, Article One received the health portfolio and Speranza was named as Health Minister. That portfolio had previously been held by Five Star Party member Giulia Grillo, who had taken over the job as Health Minister in 2018 under a Five Star party platform pledged to lower Italy’s soaring drug prices.

Grillo’s appointment of Li Bassi in October 2018, shortly after being appointed was a first step in that direction – and it set something of a precedent in Italy’s highly politicized government circles – due to the rigorous candidate selection process, overseen by an international panel of three public health experts. The process was even the focus of a Lancet opinion piece co-authored by Grillo, who admitted it was “quite unusual for Italy” but cited it as evidence that she and her government were committed to making policy choices anchored in “scientific-based methods”.

Luca Li Bassi in a recent interview on Italian national TV, Rai3

“We will apply the same methods, based on international reputation and meritocracy, that have worked well for AIFA and CSS for all future decisions concerning the leadership roles in the health system,” Grillo declared in the Lancet article published in August 2019.  Only a month later, following the government reshuffle, Grillo was out of a job.

In the intervening year that Li Bassi has held the post, he has rapidly made a name for Italy and himself in global health circles – initiating the unprecedented WHA proposal on the drug transparency resolution in February 2018, and then steering it to approval in the May WHA.  Li Bassi was widely credited for helping member states reach “common ground” in what  Angola’s Health Minister Silvia Paula Valentim Lutucuta described as “one of the most complex and polarising issues in 21st century global health.” Lutucuta chaired the WHA Committee A, which oversaw the WHA negotiations on the price transparency resolution.

But following September’s replacement of Grillo by Speranza in the government reshuffle, Li Bassi’s days now may be numbered, his supporters fear. Ironically, Speranza comes from an ardently left-wing party that would presumably be sympathetic to the price transparency agenda.  But that, informed observers remark, has apparently not made him immune to the time-worn traditions of patronage politics, including political appointments for key civil service posts.

Public notice for expressions of interest for the post of Director General of the Italian Drug Agency – AIFA
Protest By Civil Society Leaders Over Italian Move

In the civil society letter of protest to Speranza over Li Bassi’s possible replacement, the AIFA director was lauded for his role in “overcoming enormous opposition from vested interests” to see the May WHA resolution on “Improving the transparency of markets for medicines, vaccines, and other health products” approved.

“It is difficult to convey how great a challenge it was to get the WHA to consider, let alone approve a resolution dealing with transparency, given the longstanding drift towards greater secrecy and less transparency in every aspect of the development and pricing of medicines,” the signatories said.

“His expertise, commitment, compassion, diplomatic skills and tirelessness were critical to the adoption of the resolution,” the signatories noted. “It is very rare to see a senior government official do so much in such a short time to raise awareness across the global community of the need to change course on issues fundamental to – and perceived as contrary to –  the interests of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world.

The groups also pointed to Li Bassi’s previous record with other UN agencies, non-profits and global health groups, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria, where he helped pioneer a transparent drug procurement system.

“Many of us worked with Dr Li Bassi during his earlier efforts to provide access to affordable drugs for the treatment of HIV in developing countries. His work in establishing the Global Price Reporting Mechanism (GPRM) at The Global Fund has been recognised as an example of the value and feasibility of implementing transparency policies in the pharmaceutical sector,” the letter stated.

Under Li Bassi, AIFA had been expected to help lead a group of technical experts from the so-called Valletta Group of countries to take forward some of the key outcomes of the WHA drug transparency resolution into a dialogue with the European Commission’s Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council. The aim was to develop framework legislation for European countries to voluntarily band together share price data and bargain collectively with industry on pharma prices.

Should Li Bassi be moved out and a leadership vacuum created, the plans of the Valletta group may be delayed, observers have said.

Leadership on CAR-T Therapies and & Locally-supported Research

In addition to the work pioneering the WHA drug transparency resolution, Li Bassi has also been setting precedents in Italy on the support and promotion of local cutting-edge research, leading to more affordable, cell and gene therapies, colleagues told Health Policy Watch.

He persuaded the Ministry of Health to establish a national public project, investing 60 million Euros to create Italian hospital-based production facilities for CAR-T cells.  The initiative should help keep the cost of the therapies down as use of the new gene therapies to fight cancer expands.

Li Bassi also created an innovative initiative with the pharmaceutical companies Gilead and Novartis, which hold patents on CART-T treatments for lymphoma and leukaemia, to reimburse the companies in accordance with the survival rates of the patients who get the therapies – keeping treatment costs down while incentivizing therapies that prolong life expectancy.   Through another initiative, AIFA and the Ministry are investing public funds in home-grown Italian research into CART-T therapies for other conditions, particularly for children.

“In addition to his work on transparency, Dr Li Bassi is one of the leading exponents of strategies to make new technologies, such as cell and gene therapies, more affordable,” notes the civil society letter to the minister. ”To this end, his effort to empower Italian research institutions to develop new CAR-T therapies within the public health system, is extremely important not only for Italy, but also as a progressive example for other countries.

“He has reached out to the leading scientific, technical and legal experts to advance this work, and has done so at a very critical moment, given the emerging regulatory, legal and reimbursement regimes that are only now being tested. Italy is one of the few countries to undertake pro-active assessments of possible ways forward in these areas, and this is largely the result of Dr Li Bassi’s willingness to challenge the status quo and to prioritize the public interest.”

 

Beatrice Marone contributed to this article.

Image Credits: Rai3, HP-Watch/E Fletcher, Italian Ministry of Health.

As a cholera outbreak inches closer to Sudan’s capital city of Khartoum, the Sudanese Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization are scaling up the response. Two cholera cases were confirmed in the district of Khartoum State on October 19. As of Monday, November 3, the Ministry of Health had reported 332  suspected cases of cholera since 28 August when the first case was detected.

While the recent cases have been mostly concentrated in Blue Nile and Sennar States, officials are concerned that if the current outbreak of the often fatal diarrhoeal disease spreads more widely in Khartoum State and from there, to the very densely populated, urban areas of the capital city, it would have an even more serious impact, particularly on children.

“The risk of cholera spreading is very real. If not properly managed, this could have potentially serious consequences. More than eight million people live in Khartoum State, where the public health system is impacted by the economic crisis, recent flooding, and ongoing outbreaks of infectious diseases,” said Naeema Al Gasseer, WHO Representative in Sudan, in a press release.

A health worker monitors the cholera vaccination campaign in Sennar.

Together with the Ministry of Health, WHO has conducted initial risk mapping in Khartoum State to identify which areas are more likely to be at increased risk. This will allow for more informed planning to ensure that vulnerable areas, such as Sharq Elnil and Ombada localities, are better prepared to respond. Two cholera treatment centers are being set up in Ombada and Bahri localities. So far, WHO has delivered cholera medicines and supplies to treat 400 severely dehydrated patients, as well as 500 rapid diagnostic tests, which can be used for screening suspected cases in health facilities. Some 1.6 million people are also to be vaccinated in Blue Nile and Sennar States as part of the response.

Some 271 health staff and paramedics have been trained in cholera detection and management with support from Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and WHO. The Ministry of Health and WHO are working with more than 1700 male and female health promoters and volunteers to raise awareness of cholera, as well as provide education on hygiene practices and environmental health in communities affected or at risk.

“A key aspect of preventing and controlling cholera is how well at-risk communities are able to protect themselves by drinking safe water, properly handling food, avoiding defecation in open areas, hand-washing, and knowing what to do when they see the first signs of infection,” said Al Gasseer.

 

Image Credits: Twitter: @WHOSudan.

A coalition of over 40 personalities – from doctors and economists to actors and health access activists – released an open letter Tuesday calling on the French Prime Minister Edouard Philippe and the Minister of Health Agnès Buzyn to support a series of amendments to the French Social Security Budget Bill for 2020 providing for greater transparency around the selection and pricing of drugs purchased for the national health system. The bill, which provides the framework for public health system funding, will be going before the French Senate next week, and drug pricing amendments were previously blocked by the Minister of Health in a presentation of the bill to the National Assembly on October 24th.

“The government’s negative review of these amendments is incomprehensible and politically untenable,” states the petition. Noted French academics, doctors, and cultural figures such as composer Bertrand Burgalat; writer Edouard Louis; economist Thomas Piketty, anthropologist Didier Fassin; and Academy of Medicine member and medical school faculty Alfred Spira, have all signed on to the letter to the Minister of Health and the Prime Minister.

The strongly-worded statement goes on to call the rejection of the price transparency measures a “denial of the French commitment made to the World Health Organization,” referring to France’s vote in favor of the landmark price transparency resolution passed at the 72nd World Health Assembly in May. While political leaders in other European countries such as Malta and Italy have been pushing the transparency agenda, civil society actors such as l’Observatoire Transparence Médicaments (OTM) have been driving the conversation around pricing transparency in France.

The proposed amendments contained in Article 28 of the budget proposal, would provide for the systematic publication of data on prices paid by the public health system for bulk medicine purchases; more detailed patent information, as well as data on public contributions to R&D costs.  The amendments would also give the government more leeway to use the threat of “compulsory licensing” –  to produce a generic version of patented drugs – as a bargaining tool in negotiations with pharmaceutical suppliers, Pauline Londeix of OTM told Health Policy Watch. The amendments were proposed by OTM and presented by Members of Parliament of the left-wing “La France Insoumise” Party to the National Assembly two weeks ago – but were shot down at the first reading of the bill by the Minister of Health.

French Health Minister Agnès Buzyn at the National Assembly on October 24th

“We are all in favor, of course, of a very regular review of the price of medicines. This is a goal we share. But it seems to me that the method proposed to reach it does not correspond to the reality of the facts,” said Buzyn in her negative opinion of Article 28. Buzyn explained that she thought the proposed amendments, such as one clause that requires all drug prices to be reviewed at a minimum every 5 years, would actually “lead to deviant practices” and lengthen the time between price reductions for drugs.

Buzyn claimed that in more than “half the cases” CEPS, the body in charge of negotiating drug prices, actually renegotiates prices in more frequent intervals than 5 years.

Still, the Senate meeting next week will present another opportunity for the transparency amendments to be included in the final version of the budget bill.

There is “a possibility” that the transparency amendments will be accepted at that meeting, before the bill is sent back to the National Assembly for a second and final review by that legislative body before it is adopted, Londeix told Health Policy Watch. “We hope that the Senate will support [the amendments].”

Some 11,258 scientists from 153 countries have issued a sharp warning in the journal BioScience, about the climate emergency faced by the global community.

The scientists calls for “bold and drastic transformations” in six key areas to pull earth from the precipice of potentially catastrophic deterioration in basic life support systems. Their prescription includes: a rapid shift of economies from fossil fuels to renewables; reduced emissions of short-lived climate pollutants like methane and black carbon (soot) that could slow short-term warming trends “while saving millions of lives” from air pollution; restoration of degraded natural ecosystems from coral reefs to savannas; shifting to mostly plant-based foods; reduced over-consumption of materials and minerals; and stabilization of population growth with access to family planning services, progress in gender equity, and universal primary and secondary education including for girls and young women.

The article published on Monday, a month ahead of the 25th Climate Conference (COP 25) in Madrid, carries a particular note of urgency in light of the large number of signatures by scientists, who normally frame their views in cautious, incremental terms.

“Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to “tell it like it is.” On the basis of this obligation and the graphical indicators presented below, we declare, with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from around the world, clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency,” states the article published on Tuesday.

Earth’s Vital Signs in Red Zone

The scientists note that average global temperature increases are alone insufficient to capture the dimensions of the problems faced. They point to a range of “concurrent trends in the vital signs of climatic impacts” that represent a “suite of graphical vital signs of climate change over the past 40 years”.

These include: continued increases in atmospheric CO2, concentrations; in greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide); and a particularly ominous 2019 spike in CO2.

Monthly mean carbon dioxide measured at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. The carbon dioxide data ([black] curve), measured as the mole fraction in dry air, on Mauna Loa constitute the longest record of direct measurements of CO2 in the atmosphere. […] The [black line represents] the monthly mean values, centered on the middle of each month. The [red line represents] the same, after correction for the average seasonal cycle. The latter is determined as a moving average of SEVEN adjacent seasonal cycles centered on the month to be corrected, except for the first and last THREE and one-half years of the record, where the seasonal cycle has been averaged over the first and last SEVEN years, respectively. Source: https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
In addition, global ice cover “has been rapidly disappearing, evidenced by declining trends in minimum summer Arctic sea ice, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and glacier thickness worldwide. Ocean heat content, ocean acidity, sea level, area burned in the United States, and extreme weather and associated damage costs have all been trending upward… Climate change is predicted to greatly affect marine, freshwater, and terrestrial life, from plankton and corals to fishes and forests (IPCC 2018, 2019). These issues highlight the urgent need for action,” the scientists state.

“Profoundly troubling signs from human activities include sustained increases in both human and ruminant livestock populations, per capita meat production, world gross domestic product, global tree cover loss, fossil fuel consumption, the number of air passengers carried, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and per capita CO2 emissions since 2000,” they add.  There are also positive trends, such as declines in global fertility rates, increased solar and wind power production, reduced forest loss in the Amazon, and fossil fuel divestment.  But renewable power production still lags far behind that of fossil fuels, and annual fossil fuel subsidies remained greater than US$400 billion in 2018.

“To secure a sustainable future, we must change how we live, in ways that improve the vital signs summarized by our graphs. Economic and population growth are among the most important drivers of increases in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion (Pachauri et al. 2014, Bongaarts and O’Neill 2018); therefore, we need bold and drastic transformations regarding economic and population policies. We suggest six critical and interrelated steps (in no particular order) that governments, businesses, and the rest of humanity can take to lessen the worst effects of climate change. These are important steps but are not the only actions needed or possible,” the scientists add. Those include:

Energy

“The world must quickly implement massive energy efficiency and conservation practices and must replace fossil fuels with low-carbon renewables (figure 1h) and other cleaner sources of energy if safe for people and the environment. We should leave remaining stocks of fossil fuels in the ground (see the timelines in IPCC 2018) and should carefully pursue effective negative emissions using technology such as carbon extraction from the source and capture from the air and especially by enhancing natural systems (see “Nature” section). Wealthier countries need to support poorer nations in transitioning away from fossil fuels. We must swiftly eliminate subsidies for fossil fuels and use effective  and fair policies for steadily escalating carbon prices to restrain their use.”

Short-lived pollutants

“We need to promptly reduce the emissions of short-lived climate pollutants, including methane (figure 2b), black carbon (soot), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Doing this could slow climate feedback loops and potentially reduce the short-term warming trend by more than 50% over the next few decades while saving millions of lives and increasing crop yields due to reduced air pollution (Shindell et al. 2017). The 2016 Kigali amendment to phase down HFCs is welcomed.”

Nature

“We must protect and restore Earth’s ecosystems. Phytoplankton, coral reefs, forests, savannas, grasslands, wetlands, peatlands, soils, mangroves, and sea grasses contribute greatly to sequestration of atmospheric CO2. Marine and terrestrial plants, animals, and microorganisms play significant roles in carbon and nutrient cycling and storage. We need to quickly curtail habitat and biodiversity loss (figure 1f–1g), protecting the remaining primary and intact forests, especially those with high carbon stores and other forests with the capacity to rapidly sequester carbon (proforestation), while increasing reforestation and afforestation where appropriate at enormous scales. Although available land may be limiting in places, up to a third of emissions reductions needed by 2030 for the Paris agreement (less than 2°C) could be obtained with these natural climate solutions (Griscom et al. 2017).”

Food

“Eating mostly plant-based foods while reducing the global consumption of animal products (figure 1c–d), especially ruminant livestock (Ripple et al. 2014), can improve human health and significantly lower GHG emissions (including methane in the “Short-lived pollutants” step). Moreover, this will free up croplands for growing much-needed human plant food instead of livestock feed, while releasing some grazing land to support natural climate solutions (see “Nature” section). Cropping practices such as minimum tillage that increase soil carbon are vitally important. We need to drastically reduce the enormous amount of food waste around the world.”

Economy

“Excessive extraction of materials and overexploitation of ecosystems, driven by economic growth, must be quickly curtailed to maintain long-term sustainability of the biosphere. We need a carbon-free economy that explicitly addresses human dependence on the biosphere and policies that guide economic decisions accordingly. Our goals need to shift from GDP growth and the pursuit of affluence toward sustaining ecosystems and improving human well-being by prioritizing basic needs and reducing inequality.”

Population

“Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per day (figure 1a–b), the world population must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity. There are proven and effective policies that strengthen human rights while lowering fertility rates and lessening the impacts of population growth on GHG emissions and biodiversity loss. These policies make family-planning services available to all people, remove barriers to their access and achieve full gender equity, including primary and secondary education as a global norm for all, especially girls and young women (Bongaarts and O’Neill 2018).”

 

Image Credits: blog.oup.com, Bioscience.

Demonstrators poured onto the streets and politicians pointed fingers as Delhi’s air pollution levels soared above the threshold air quality monitoring stations could record on Sunday. The Indian Supreme Court issued a scathing statement calling for politicians to stop “passing the buck” on the air pollution issue and take urgent action in the “public health emergency” declared last Friday.

Levels of dangerous PM10 small particles rose above 999 micrograms/cubic meter Sunday morning throughout the city, breaking previous records. And levels of even more deadly PM2.5 fine particles hit a peak at around 860 in parts of the city at times on the same day – over 20 times higher than the WHO Air Quality 24 hour guideline limits – [50 micrograms/m3 PM10 and 25 micrograms/m3 PM2.5].

Young protesters from the Democratic Youth Federation Of India, Delhi state, take to the streets to demand action against air pollution.

“Delhi is choking every year and we are not able to do anything,” said Justice Arun Mishra in a Supreme Court hearing about the air pollution. The Court summoned top bureaucrats from Delhi as well as neighboring states to attend a hearing on Tuesday over the crisis.

Defunct “state-machinery” has resulted in politicians passing responsibility for the air pollution issue between city and national governments without taking real action to reduce the annual spike in dangerous air pollution, the Court said, in a far reaching order obtained by Health Policy Watch calling on bureaucrats at all levels and in urban and rural regions to halt burning. The sources of air pollution include urban vehicles, urban waste incineration, industrial and household emissions as well as uncontrolled crop burning from the surrounding Punjab and Haryana, the Court documents noted.

But India’s Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi maintained his silence over the crisis, while on a trip abroad. According to the prime minister’s official website, PM Modi was spending Monday evening in Thailand at an annual Summit of Asian Heads of State, before returning to Delhi Monday evening.

The Prime Minister’s Office had announced it would be hosting an emergency meeting on the issue soon. Still, citizens were critical of prime minister Modi’s decision to remain away from Delhi during the “public health emergency.”

Delhi politicians such as Akanksha Ola are up in arms, calling the national government led by PM Modi and local government of Arvind Kejriwal “equal partners in crime on strangulating the people of Delhi.”

City residents are furious at the political relay, staging protests and Tweetstorms to flood the streets and social media with news of Delhi’s plight. Members of the Indian Congress party protested in front of Delhi Chief Minister Kejriwal’s residence on Monday, while twitter hashtags such as #DelhiChokes and #DelhiAirEmergency were trending all around the world.

Ineffective Efforts to Reduce Air Pollution

Emergency efforts to reduce air pollution announced on Friday, such as temporarily banning construction in the city and permit private vehicles to circulate only on alternate certain days as per the odd-even digits of license plate numbers, have either failed to be enforced or failed to be effective.

Supreme Court members asked city leaders to justify the “logic” behind the odd-even scheme, asking them to present concrete data showing that it actually reduced the number of polluting vehicles on the roads or had a measurable effect on the air pollution levels.

Air pollution levels at Monday 10pm in Delhi, showing the combined data of three government monitoring networks, CPCB, DPCC and SAFAR.

Speaking to Health Policy Watch, clean air advocate Jyoti Pande Levakare praised the High Court for taking action to call all of the governing parties together, but said that without political movement, as well, the system remains stalled.

“Only the Supreme Court seems to care. Nothing else has really changed. Our prime minister is breathing better air in Thailand while we choke here. Indian lungs are cheap,” she said. “Unless clean air is made a mission of national importance, unless human health is made a priority, we will continue to lurch from crisis to crisis.”

A major focus of controversy continued to be the uncontrolled “stubble burning” of rice fields in Punjab and Haryana – whose smoke has been drifting into the city and contributing to about 40% of Delhi’s air pollution levels, according to informed estimates.

Clean air advocates as well as scientists note that the burning of stubble had become a more serious problem over the past decade – after the government ordered farmers to delay their planting and harvest season by a couple of months.  Since the prevailing winds shift towards Delhi in late fall/early winter, that has left the city more exposed than it was in the past to the burning of harvested rice stalks.

Regional Impacts of Pollution Plume in India

Also, more and more rice is being grown in Punjab, replacing other indigenous food staples that didn’t require burning of fields, post-harvest, critics have said. However, with no clear leadership from prime minister Modi’s office, solutions for the seasonal issue seemed to be hostage to competing political and commercial interests.

Subsidies for machines to clear the rice stubble from fields have been proposed – although those are unlikely to be affordable to smallholder farmers.  Others have suggested replacing rice with GMO cotton or maize for livestock and poultry feed – although critics say that this would convert valuable farm production from plant-based foods for human consumption to foods for livestock feed – in a country that has a high proportion of vegetarians. Water-hungry cotton would remove valuable land from food production altogether — as well as causing even further damage to aquifers. Against the storm of debate, few people seem to be thinking about practical solutions that fit India’s land resources and food production needs, said Lavakare, although those have been laid out over and over.

“Farmers in Punjab and Haryana burn crop stubble to clear their fields as they have no real alternatives. Burning is the fastest way to turnaround their capital—their acreage.” she wrote in an article published in the Delhi-based Financial Express during last year’s crisis, in October 2018.

“These are areas that used to grow low water-use, nutrition-dense coarse grains such as pearl millet (bajra), finger millet (ragi), sorghum (jowar), barley, rye and maize. Perhaps the government can offer better price support to encourage farmers to switch back to crops like these…Incentivizing low water-use crops like millets instead of [rice] paddies, paying for farm-waste – especially involving enterprises that can use the waste as a raw material—make better sense.”

 

Image Credits: DYFI Delhi Twitter, www.aqicn.org.

Delhi declared a public health emergency as air pollution levels soared on Friday, while Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said that the mega-city had “turned into a gas chamber”.

According to official government monitoring stations, levels of tiny PM10 air pollution particles had risen as high as 20 times WHO Air Quality Guideline levels in parts of the city over recent days. As of Friday evening, concentrations of the small particles, among the most health hazardous pollutants, were averaging 300-500 micrograms per cubic meter of air – or 6-10 times the WHO 24-hour guideline of 50.

Air pollution levels at 10 p.m. Friday night near Delhi national stadium, showing the combined data of three government monitoring networks, CPCB, DPCC and SAFAR

To cope with the emergency, the Delhi Government launched an unprecedented mass distribution of some 5 million masks to school children, banned construction, cancelled school until Tuesday and placed sharp limits on vehicle travel with an “odd-even” scheme permitting private vehicles to travel only on alternate days, as per the digits of their license plate.

“In the interest of protecting our children, it has been decided to keep all the schools – Government, Government-aided, and Private – in the National Capital Territory of Delhi closed until November 5th 2019,” said the Office of the Deputy Chief Minister in a decree published on Twitter.

Kejriwal blamed the increase in “stubble burning” in neighboring regions of Punjab and Haryana for Delhi’s recent spike in air pollution levels. The practice of burning leftover straw after grains are harvested is a rapid method for farmers to clear their fields, but also sends huge plumes of smoke and biomass pollution into the air, spreading for hundreds of kilometers.

“Delhi has turned into a gas chamber due to smoke from crop burning in neighbouring states,” said the minister on his Twitter feed. “It is very important that we protect ourselves from this toxic air. Through pvt & govt schools, we have started distributing 50 lakh [5 million] masks today I urge all Delhiites to use them whenever needed.”

But scientists and civil society activists maintained that no single source can be blamed for the city’s chronic air pollution problems, which peak in the early winter every year. Rather, a combination of urban and rural sources create a perfect storm of pollution that hovers over the city and the wider region. These also include pollution from domestic wood/biomass stoves; unfiltered smokestack emissions from Delhi area power plants; urban waste incineration; construction dust; the rampant use of polluting two-stroke engines in two-wheeler vehicles; as well as the seasonal “Diwali” festival of lights – where setting off firecrackers is a traditional ritual.

(left-right) Delhi sky on Sept 27, Delhi sky on Nov 1, Kejriwal distributes masks to school children in air pollution emergency

“We know that the air pollution comes from at least 8-10 sources.  We want the government to address all of these and not just cherry pick,” said Jyoti Pande Lavakare an activist journalist who runs the organization CareForAir.org and is completing a book “Breathing Here is Injurious To Your Health” to be published early next year.

She said that her organization had grave misgivings about the mask distribution scheme – whether the masks would in fact have adequate air pollution filters, and whether they would really reach 5 million people. On top of that, unless masks are properly fitted they won’t work at all, even as a stopgap measure – and for many children the masks will just be too large.

“Masks are not a solution,” said Lavakare. “And they may give you a false sense of security.  Masks are more of a visual. I am for masks because they make an invisible problem visible; they are an immediate necessity, but only if they fit well. And people who have asthma will feel suffocated if they wear a mask. The only real thing to do in an emergency is to stay indoors and keep respiration rates low.”

However, she added that Delhi’s chronic air pollution issues, which peak annually in November and December, required more than “short-term band-aid measures”, adding that leadership from the very top of the political spectrum was needed.

“I want the prime minister [Narendra Modi] to actually lead this issue; currently it is actually rudderless and leaderless. You cannot have a prime minister who is talking about clean India without talking about clean air.  And yet he has been strangely silent on this issue.  In no forum has he talked about air pollution,” she observed, noting that each air pollution source has a longstanding history of failure behind it.

For example, a Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Climate Change decision to install modern pollution filters on Delhi area power plants by 2017, potentially reducing average air pollution levels by about 30% in northern India, has been delayed for over two years by the Ministry of Power and could remain stalled until 2020 if the latter Ministry has its way. Three-wheeler vehicles, auto rickshaws, which provide much of the Delhi’s public transport, still run on heavily polluting two-stroke engines. And regional pollution from crop-burning has intensified as local varieties of nutrient-rich food crops were gradually replaced by rice, produced mainly for export and sucking up scarce water resources, says Lavakare.

Lavakare is, however, more hopeful that the debate about air pollution is growing stronger and public opinion more informed about the multiple health risks air pollution creates – which according to WHO range from spikes in hospital admissions and death rates during air pollution emergencies to stunted childhood lung development, reduced long-term life expectancy and higher premature mortality from stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, and respiratory disease as a result of chronic air pollution exposures. Recent evidence has also pointed to serious air pollution impacts on the brain development of infants and young children.

“When we started to build awareness three years ago, we were told by top government officials that it was a rich person’s problem. The point they were missing was that it is a bigger social inequity for the disenfranchised and the homeless people who don’t have the privilege of having masks, air purifiers and four walls to keep the pollution out.

“Now, the government can no longer say this is just a rich person’s problem. It’s clear that it is everyone’s problem.  And the Indian media is finally fully supportive,” said Lavakare. “No one [politician] cares if it it really is creating toxic impacts on health, but people do care if it gets them votes. And at least that is a start. But we need a tipping point – like the film ‘Under the Dome‘ which got China to do something.”

It was clear that after the fifth day without sunlight, average Delhi residents were crying for change.

“No air circulation. Eyes burn. Breathing is difficult. Can’t even go out for a walk. Sick!” commented one commentator on Twitter.

One Indian parliamentary member, former cricketeer Gautam Gambhir critiqued the high-level response and urged Kejriwal to check how many construction sites are complying with the new regulations on the ground.

A high profile, India-Bangladesh cricket match planned for Sunday provided a lightning rod for a lively debate over the air pollution emergency, with critics calling for the match to be postponed because of the irreversible health impacts exposure to such high air pollution levels can have, but sports authorities resisting.

UN Goodwill Ambassador and Indian actress Dia Mirza blasted the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) decision to continue hosting the India versus Bangladesh match on November 3rd, despite the dismal air quality.

“BCCI please stop hiding your head in the smog,” she tweeted. “This air harms players and the people that come to watch these games.”

One cricket commentator drolly observed that perhaps the BCCI’s decision to not cancel the match was strategic, saying that “Indian cricketers are better used to such bad air than any other cricketing nation.”

Indian players, used to playing in environments with poor air quality, will be able to better tolerate the ghastly air pollution levels and play better than athletes who are used to training in climates with lower levels of air pollution, he reasoned.

“India shall, through series openers scheduled in Delhi’s toxic air, introduce pulmonary disintegration to the game,” said Siddharth Monga in a piece for ESPN.

Grace Ren contributed reporting to this story.

Image Credits: www.aqicn.org, Arvind Kejriwal.

Cutting-edge health technologies – such as gene editing therapies for cancer – have the potential to save lives, and the international intellectual property system should be leveraged to drive innovation and bring those therapies to people who need them, said the leaders of global health, trade and intellectual property agencies at a Trilateral Symposium on Thursday.

The symposium, convened under the theme “Cutting-edge Health Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges,” is the eighth such open forum co-hosted by the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to foster collaboration around public health and intellectual property.

(left-right) Dr Tedros, Roberto Azevêdos, and Minelik Alemu Getahun.

“The essential insight is that while improving access to existing technologies remains an important priority, it will not suffice to meet future public health challenges,” said the WTO Director-General, Roberto Azevêdo, in his opening statement. He noted that advancements in new diagnostic tools, therapies, and prophylaxis treatments have greatly expanded the possibilities for treating and preventing certain diseases.

As an example, Azevêdo highlighted CAR-T (chimeric antigen receptor) cell therapy, a cutting-edge cancer treatment still under development. This form of cell therapy leverages advancements in gene editing by genetically altering natural white blood cells to attack cancerous cells. Public sector research institutions currently hold 40% of the patents in this area of medical research, while private firms hold 49%.

“How [the patent holders] choose to license these technologies will be an important factor in how therapies are rolled out in practice,” said Azêvedo.

The Director-General of the WHO, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus agreed, stating that “Advances in science and technology are opening up new horizons in public health that were considered science fiction not so very long ago… And yet we continue to live in a world marked by shocking inequality.”

Dr Tedros posed the question, “How do we harness the power of innovation to narrow inequalities, rather than widen them?”

“We must understand better the benefits, costs and limitations of mechanisms for incentivizing innovation and their impacts on the pricing of health products,” he added, reaffirming WHO’s commitment to Universal Health Coverage, including increasing access to medicines and vaccines.

The IP system also faces challenges as scientific advancements quickly move forward, WIPO Assistant Director-General Minelik Alemu Getahun said, noting that IP regulations must balance “incentivizing and rewarding innovation” while ensuring that knowledge to support “continued innovation” is shared.

“Today’s discussions will explore the landscape of cutting-edge health technologies and consider some of the opportunities and challenges of optimizing their use in a variety of settings. We should endeavour to make our discussions as accessible to the public as possible by elucidating concepts and providing clear, fact-based information related to these exciting and ever-evolving health technologies,” he said.

The three opening speakers set the stage for a broader technical discussion on the challenges and opportunities of cutting-edge health technologies. A morning plenary reviewed highlights of new medical innovations in biotechnology, information technology, and the application of big data to the medical sector. A second panel focused more on issues of access to new medical innovations, affordability and increasing costs for health care systems, along with the ethics of using patient data.

For more information, see the WTO press release.

Image Credits: WTO.

The UN COP Bureau has accepted Spain’s offer to host the COP25 Climate Conference in Madrid from December 2-13, following a tumultuous few days after Chile suddenly withdrew from hosting the conference due to a massive wave of protests in Santiago.

In a short statement released Friday, UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Patricia Espinosa said, “We are pleased to announce the COP Bureau has agreed that COP25 will take place from 2-13 December in Madrid, Spain.”

Spain offered to host the upcoming UN Climate Conference (COP 25) on behalf of Chile on Thursday, which said on Wednesday that it could not stage this year’s meeting in Santiago due to security concerns related to the civil unrest that has been raging for the past two weeks in the capital city.

“Following [Wednesday’s] announcement, the Government of Chile, as incoming Presidency, has informed me that they received a generous offer of support from the Government of Spain to hold the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP25) in Madrid on the same dates as originally planned. We are hopeful that the COP Bureau can consider this proposed solution as soon as possible,” said Espinosa, in a curt statement on Thursday, released by UN media. “It is encouraging to see countries working together in the spirit of multilateralism to address climate change, the biggest challenge facing this and future generations.”

The Spanish offer shed a glimmer of light over the troubled preparations for the 25th annual meeting of the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC) after plans fell into disarray for the second time in a year. Late last year, Brazil withdrew its request to host the 2019 conference, after the election of the far-right President Jair Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro claimed the move was due to budget restrictions, but the new Brazilian leader has also appointed a climate skeptic as foreign minister, and has also taken steps to increase development in the sensitive Amazon rain forest region.

Madrid

The bold, face-saving measure by Spain to host the 2-13 December conference should help revive some of the momentum around this year’s COP event, which marks the 25th anniversary of the Framework Convention. This year’s COP is also significant as it comes on the heels of the 23 September UN Climate Summit, where countries made a lukewarm showing of commitment to key mitigation measures that climate experts say are desperately needed to keep global warming below 2° C.

Even if formal country commitments to climate action remain weak, the annual conference usually draws tens of thousands of participants – and features a wide array of events and exhibits not only for official delegates but also involving civil society, businesses and the public.

Observers close to the conference preparations had assumed that following Chile’s announcement, the meeting by default would be moved to Bonn, Germany, home of the UNFCCC Secretariat. Now, however, the UNFCCC has accepted the offer by Spain’s acting Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to use Madrid as the alternative location, which the Chileans have accepted and recommended to the UN.

Under the proposed arrangements, Chile would still assume the presidency of this year’s COP, while Spain hosts the event. A similar arrangement occurred in 2017, when COP23 was held in Bonn, while Fiji held the presidency.

1 November 2019 – This story has been updated to reflect recent announcements from the COP Bureau confirming the new location of COP25.

Image Credits: Cuellar .