Eliminating Cervical Cancer is a Global Health Equity Challenge 01/04/2026 Caroline Bwanali-Mussa, Haileyesus Getahun, Antje Leendertse & Leslie Ramsammy A school girl in Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, receives the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Cervical cancer should no longer be killing women. It is one of the few cancers that we already know how to prevent, detect early, and treat effectively. Yet it remains the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide, causing around 600,000 new cases and 340,000 deaths each year. The tragedy is not just the scale of the disease—it is the inequality behind it. Women in lower-income countries are three times more likely to develop cervical cancer and six times more likely to die from it than those in wealthy countries. In other words, cervical cancer is not just a medical problem. It is a stark symbol of global health inequity. But there is also good news. Unlike most cancers, cervical cancer can be eliminated. The tools already exist: HPV vaccines and screening tests, and effective treatment. The World Health Organization (WHO) has given us a roadmap with clear goals. What we lack is not science or plans, but global resolve. History shows what is possible when the world acts together. For centuries, smallpox killed hundreds of millions of people. In 1958, the World Health Assembly called for its eradication. Countries collaborated—even at the height of the Cold War—sharing vaccines and resources. Two decades later, in 1980, smallpox became the first disease ever eradicated by humanity. That moment should inspire us today. If the world can eliminate one of the deadliest infectious diseases in history, we can surely eliminate a cancer that we already know how to prevent. The encouraging progress made towards eliminating other diseases – such as polio and HIV transmission from mothers to their children – also provides hope and lessons for cervical cancer. The path is clear In 2020, WHO member states adopted a global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer, setting clear milestones known as the 90-70-90 targets for 2030: 90% of girls vaccinated against HPV by age 15 70% of women screened by age 35 and again by 45 90% of women with cervical disease treated. These targets are ambitious, but achieving them is a key step on the path to elimination, which is defined as an incidence threshold of less than four cases per 100,000 women per year. Some wealthy countries are well advanced: Sweden aims to eliminate cervical cancer by 2030. Australia may do so by 2035. Canada and several European countries hope to achieve elimination by 2040. Lower-income countries should also be ambitious, and many could realistically eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 with the right tools and support. Rwanda, for example, has already achieved vaccination coverage close to 98%, while a recent campaign in Malawi targeting schoolgirls and adolescents extended vaccine coverage above 90%, proving that elimination is not a dream—it is a clear policy choice. Two Rwandan girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka. Rwanda has achieved 98% vaccination for HPV. Four actions that can save millions of lives Countries do not need complex new technologies to make significant progress. The basic strategy is straightforward, using proven approaches that: Educate and mobilize the public: Awareness about HPV, vaccination, and screening remains uneven. Communities must understand that cervical cancer is preventable. Expand innovative screening: HPV tests—including molecular assays on self-collected vaginal or urine samples—can detect high-risk HPV early, well before cancer develops. Vaccinate girls—and boys too: HPV vaccination is one of the most powerful cancer-prevention tools ever developed, offering protection not just against cervical cancer, but anal, penile and throat cancers, as well. Ensure treatment is available: Women who develop cervical disease must have access to surgery, medicines, and radiotherapy. Pre-cancerous lesions detected early can often be treated through simple procedures in primary care settings. The equity gap The greatest obstacle is not knowledge – it is inequality. More than 90% of cervical cancer deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Many governments cannot fully afford large-scale vaccination programs or nationwide screening. This is why cervical cancer elimination must become a financing priority. When the world confronted HIV in the early 2000s, international partnerships, donor funds, and global activism transformed the response. Today, millions of people are living longer because of that mobilization. Cervical cancer deserves the same sense of urgency and commitment, recognizing that the current global context demands a different approach—one that builds on country leadership and existing services to reach people where they are, in their own communities. Addressing the equity gap also means that we must continue to fight for the rights of women and girls to education, autonomy and freedom from poverty – conditions that often determine whether health care is within reach. And it means ensuring that vaccines are developed to address the HPV35 genotype that is increasingly contributing to the burden of cervical cancer in Africa and among women with HIV. Building a global movement Momentum is growing. In November 2025, the world marked the first World Cervical Cancer Elimination Day, and several countries now hold awareness campaigns throughout January. In Geneva, we are working to mobilize the diplomatic community and governments on this issue as part of the broader right to health. These initiatives must grow into a true global movement – one that engages communities, strengthens political will, and holds governments accountable for progress. Another lesson from HIV/AIDS is clear: when societies mobilize, transformation follows. Historic opportunity If humanity eliminates cervical cancer, it will mark the first time we have ended a cancer as a public health threat. The implications would be profound, giving hope that other cancers can also be prevented or eliminated through advances in science, North-South and South-South cooperation, community empowerment, and political commitment. The window for action is open, and the tools are at hand. Further delay will cost millions of lives. We cannot allow current pressure on health and development budgets to prevent us from doing what is right – ending cervical cancer as a disease of inequality and neglect. Instead, let’s commit the resources, mobilize the partnerships, and finish the work. See related story Caroline Bwanali-Mussa is the Permanent Representative of Malawi to the United Nations in Geneva and Ambassador of Malawi to Switzerland. Dr Haileyesus Getahun is Chief Executive Officer of the Global Centre for Health Diplomacy and Inclusion, based in Geneva. Antje Leendertse is the Permanent Representative of the Federal Republic of Germany to the United Nations in Geneva. Dr Leslie Ramsammy is the Permanent Representative of Guyana to the United Nations in Geneva. Image Credits: Gavi, Gavi, UNICEF, CeHDI. Two-Speed Multilateralism: Breaking the Deadlock on Climate and Health 31/03/2026 Felix Sassmannshausen Panellists Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum (WHO, stage centre), Miguel Ruiz Botero (Colombian UN Mission, stage right), Margarita Gutierrez (IISD, screen left), Ömer Öztürk (Türkiye Min. of Environment, screen right), and Gül Mersinlioğlu Serin (Türkiye Minister of Health, screen centre) discussing two-speed multilateralism in Geneva. From stalled Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) negotiations to failing consensus in global climate policies, United Nations structures face a profound crisis. Diplomats are currently being forced to explore alternative governance models to bridge the disconnect between sluggish, power-driven diplomacy and the rapid, equitable action required in health and climate crises. This institutional rupture and the resulting emergence of two-speed multilateralism took centre stage during a critical panel hosted by the Global Health Centre in Geneva on 30 March. Professor Suerie Moon delivers opening remarks at the event. “The world order and the postwar institutions that were created to address global problems are at a unique moment of rupture, possibly collapse or transformation, depending on where we go from here,” said Professor Suerie Moon, co-director of the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute, during her opening remarks of the expert panel discussion. The event was co-hosted by the Centre’s International Geneva Global Health Platform, alongside the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the Geneva Environment Network. There was clear unity among the expert panellists – ranging from global health researchers and climate adaptation advisors to international diplomats – that when traditional, consensus-based multilateralism stagnates, the international community must pragmatically turn to alternative, faster diplomatic channels. Two-speed multilateralism: agile coalitions accelerate implementation, while universal consensus provides global legal legitimacy. This “two-speed multilateralism” combines the universal legitimacy of consensus-based UN negotiations with the rapid implementation capabilities of smaller, highly ambitious “coalitions of the willing”, aiming at preventing single nations from vetoing desperately needed progress on environmental and public health protections. Miguel Ruiz Botero argues for the need of two-speed multilateralism because some nations weaponize consensus to obstruct global progress. “Consensus has been, in essence, weaponised by a few countries to obstruct progress,” said Miguel Ruiz Botero, second secretary at the Permanent Mission of Colombia to the UN in Geneva, during the panel discussion. For example, as global temperatures reach record levels, experts argue that traditional structures are simply not mobilising political action fast enough to protect vulnerable populations affected by climate change. To bypass this gridlock, Colombia is hosting the Santa Marta Conference on 28-29 April, which will serve as a prime example of this accelerated diplomatic speed. Co-hosted by the Netherlands, the summit aims to establish a clear pathway for transitioning away from fossil fuels outside the traditional UN architecture. This parallel track aims to establish a strict division of diplomatic labour, as COP30 President André Aranha Corrêa do Lago recently outlined. While the “first tier” ensures universal legitimacy and sets the collective legal direction, the “second tier,” or fast track tier, focusses exclusively on rapid implementation by mobilising finance and deploying solutions at scale without reopening debates already settled by consensus. WHO support for two-speed approach Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum (WHO) argues that health-based fossil fuel transitions offer immense, self-financing benefits. Notably, the WHO voiced clear support for this parallel approach. “If a certain subset of parties or countries can take a part of the agenda that moves things in a positive way, then you know that has to be supported,” said Dr Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum, WHO head of the climate change, energy and air quality unit. He noted that the health gains from reducing air pollution would effectively cover the costs of transitioning away from fossil fuels, making a compelling, evidence-based case for this accelerated track. Key Moments for Climate and Health Diplomacy in 2026 This decisive backing for initiatives outside the formal UN architecture is unusual for an agency traditionally restrained by universal consensus. However, in private discussions following the event, experts observed that the WHO is navigating new political dynamics. Following the US exit, the institution may be experiencing reduced diplomatic pressure, inadvertently allowing it to embrace more pragmatic, parallel agreements without its usual hesitation. This momentum will continue at the upcoming 79th World Health Assembly in May. While the WHO will not formally report on its “Global Action Plan on Climate Change and Health” during the main agenda, Türkiye and Brazil are set to co-host a high-level side event to fill the gap and strengthen the integration of the health and climate dossiers ahead of the COP31 summit in November 2026. Bypassing slow paced consensus is not new The panellists discussed that while two-speed multilateralism is an old tool, the 2026 rupture makes it a necessity. The strategy of utilizing alternative diplomatic pathways to bypass institutional gridlock is not a novel invention. “Two-speed multilateralism is certainly not a new phenomenon,” said Moon. “Ever since the UN was founded 80 years ago, there have been parallel bilateral and minilateral processes that work alongside global multilateral processes.” In recent decades, parallel negotiations and smaller alliances have historically operated alongside universal frameworks to influence broader international arenas. When traditional consensus rules made a UN-based landmine convention impossible in the late 1990s, Canada and a group of progressive nations moved negotiations outside the formal architecture to create the Ottawa Process. This historical success, alongside the eventual adoption of the Arms Trade Treaty by the UN General Assembly, demonstrates how coalitions of the willing can effectively force meaningful international agreements when broad consensus fails, explained Colombia’s representative Botero. The upcoming Santa Marta conference will act as the first major testing ground for establishing this diplomatic strategy in climate policies. Unlike exclusive diplomatic clubs where powerful nations make decisions behind closed doors, this approach remains open to states ready to act. Integrating health into climate action Ultimately, these efforts aim to create a push-pull dynamic that elevates the baseline ambition of the entire international community. Gül Mersinlioğlu Serin from the Ministry of Health, Türkiye highlights the synergy between UN legitimacy and voluntary coalitions. “We see value in both tracks, the inclusiveness and legitimacy of the UN system alongside the dynamism of the coalition of voluntary initiatives that can accelerate progress,” said Dr Gül Mersinlioğlu Serin, a health expert at the Turkish Ministry of Health. However, securing these baseline commitments – and breaking down two decades of silos between climate and health negotiations – remains challenging. Despite these hurdles, the recent COP30 summit in Belém, Brazil, delivered clear progress by finalising the Baku Adaptation Roadmap and establishing 59 voluntary indicators for the Global Goal on Adaptation. This allows the international community to measure climate impacts through human health metrics, such as heat-related mortality and local health system resilience, explained Ömer Öztürk, head of adaptation to climate change and local policies at the Turkish Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change. Expanding action through local health WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus speaking at COP30 in Belém, which launched he Belém Health Action Plan. The Belém Health Action Plan established a critical framework for building low-carbon, climate-resilient health systems, effectively translating slow-moving global agreements into on-the-ground implementation. By targeting surveillance, capacity-building, and digital innovation, the plan ensures adaptation measures actively address severe health inequities. To successfully execute these measures at an accelerated pace, experts argue that broad climate goals must be communicated in terms that specific sectoral ministries understand. Margarita Gutierrez (IISD) emphasizes the need to translate climate goals into health-specific language. “This is a translation, this is different language and this happens with all the sectors,” said Margarita Gutierrez, policy advisor for Friends of Climate and Health at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, emphasising that mainstreaming climate considerations into everyday sectoral policies provides a crucial opportunity to coordinate joint actions. However, Gutierrez warned that unless countries actively integrate these health metrics into their formal UN commitments – such as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) – securing health’s relevance and funding on future global agendas will remain incredibly difficult. But as amending these universal UN agreements is a years-long bureaucratic process, experts argue that fast-track, parallel coalitions are urgently needed to bypass the gridlock and deploy health solutions immediately. Rebuilding trust through equitable cooperation Small developing island states are highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change and rely on universal diplomatic processes to ensure they hold equal weight to major global powers. However, building on two-speed multilateralism and operating outside universal frameworks carries significant risks, prompting debates about fragmentation and the potential exclusion of smaller developing nations. “Considering, for example, that small island developing states are some of the most vulnerable to climate change, it’s really important that they have the equal weight to be able to stop the process,” said WHO’s Campbell-Lendrum, arguing that universal forums allow vulnerable nations to demand the same attention as major powers. Margot Morris highlights Australia’s commitment to supporting climate-health cooperation with Pacific island nations. To ensure these frontline voices are not lost, diplomats are actively elevating regional priorities. Highlighting this effort, Australia, presiding over the negotiations at the COP31 summit, announced that it is cooperating with Pacific islands to support a pre-COP31 gathering. “We are working hand in hand with Pacific Island Forum members and regional organisations to shine a global spotlight on our region,” said Margot Morris, counsellor at the Permanent Mission of Australia to the UN. As the Geneva event concluded with characteristic sober pragmatism, the underlying message was clear: by ensuring rapid progress does not come at the expense of equity, two-speed multilateralism could help counter the climate crisis and stabilise the deeply fractured international order. Image Credits: Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana , Unsplash/Ernests Vaga. New Open Source AI Platform Aims to Accelerate Malaria Drug Discovery 31/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan A health worker examines a child with suspected malaria. Scientists working on new malaria drugs now have access to an open-access artificial intelligence (AI)-powered platform aimed at accelerating drug discovery, thanks to a partnership between Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) and deepmirror. Drug Design for Global Health (dd4gh) uses “both predictive and generative AI to give researchers, especially those in the most resource-limited settings, access to cutting-edge technology that would otherwise be out of reach”, according to a media release from MMV. The dd4gh platform was developed using input gathered during co‑creation workshops in Ghana and Switzerland with global drug discovery researchers. Its AI models are trained on data sets from a wide range of studies conducted by global health researchers, enabling scientists to benefit from insights generated across multiple research efforts. “At a time when the global health sector is facing significant constraints, dd4gh demonstrates the power of partnership,” said MMV CEO Dr Martin Fitchet. “By giving scientists in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) free access to advanced AI tools, we can accelerate the discovery of lifesaving medicines led by the people closest to the diseases we are trying to defeat.” The platform implements active learning, a technique that allows AI and machine learning (ML) to continuously improve its predictions by learning from new data. It analyses large data sets and proposes the most promising compounds to explore in the lab. Shorter timelines, reduced costs These technologies have the potential to dramatically shorten timelines and reduce costs for drug discovery, allowing scientists to focus their time and resources on what is more likely to work, enabling faster discovery of treatments for diseases that pose significant global health challenges. “Africa is disproportionately affected by many infectious and non-infectious diseases, yet African-led solutions are limited. Tools like dd4gh can have a transformative impact on the continent’s capacity for drug discovery research,” said Prof Richard Amewu, lead of the drug innovation group at the University of Ghana, which tested the platform. Dr Godwin Dziwornu, senior investigator in medicinal chemistry at the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) H3D, said that the platform is “easy to access and user-friendly”. Dziwornu added: “I’ve found it very useful in two main areas: generating new compound designs and the models available to assess compound properties and predict their drug likeness to solve a particular liability, for example, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. This helps me guide my decisions to synthesise high-quality compounds, saving me precious time and resources.” Caroline Maina, a UCT PhD candidate and participant in a co-creation workshop, said there are other AI tools that can help with drug discovery “but being in a resource-limited setting makes purchasing a license prohibitive”. “Making dd4gh open access for researchers in global health means more of us can explore new ideas and apply AI to finding treatments for diseases that are part of our everyday realities,” said Maina. Dr Max Jakobs, co-founder and CEO of deepmirror, said the free platform aims to strengthen “a more inclusive global scientific ecosystem” as “access to advanced AI should not depend on where a scientist works or their laboratory’s resources”. deepmirror builds chemistry-based foundation models for biopharma and research organisations to support active drug discovery programmes. It integrates predictive and generative AI directly into research workflows, combining “proprietary data with models trained on larger, curated datasets, which are continuously updated and strengthened over time”. MMV is a not-for-profit product development partnership working to discover, develop and deliver medicines to treat, prevent and eliminate malaria. Since 1999, its co-developed medicines have helped 1.3 billion people. Image Credits: Tommy Trenchard/ Global Fund, Damien Schumann / MMV. More Countries Refer to Refugees in Health Policies, but Access and Data Gaps Persist 30/03/2026 Stefan Anderson First global survey of 93 nations shows two-thirds include these populations in health plans, but none provide equal access to undocumented migrants. More than 60 countries now include refugees and migrants in their national health policies, according to a new World Health Organization (WHO) report tracking progress on commitments first set out by the World Health Assembly in 2019. The finding, drawn from a survey of 93 member states, is the first systematic count of how countries are implementing a resolution that called on governments to ensure refugees and migrants have access to health services, are included in national health planning, and are counted in health data systems. “Many countries have begun integrating refugee and migrant health into national strategies,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “Yet gaps remain, particularly in collecting and using migration-related health data, ensuring participation of refugees and migrants in decision-making, and guaranteeing access to care for all, regardless of legal status.” “Like anyone else, refugees and migrants need uninterrupted, affordable and equitable access to health services wherever they are,” Tedros said. While WHO called the findings “encouraging,” the picture the report paints is difficult to read clearly. What “inclusion in a national health policy” actually means for care access for migrants and refugees varies widely – and the report does not name which countries fall where. Two-thirds of the 93 surveyed countries said they include refugees and migrants in their health policies. When asked what level of access different groups receive, 16 countries said refugees can access services on a par with the host population, 14 extended that standard to documented migrant workers, and 11 to asylum seekers. No country surveyed reported providing equal access to migrants in irregular situations – those living without legal status or formal documentation. The positive examples the report does name – from Belgium to Chile – are presented as case studies. Only 37% of countries routinely collect and disseminate migration-related health data. Fewer than 40% train health workers in culturally responsive care. Just 30% have run campaigns to counter misinformation or discrimination, the report found. The report is the first systematic quantification of these indicators, further blurring the picture of progress, as there is no baseline to compare against. The data is also entirely drawn from a voluntary survey completed by member states with no independent verification, meaning the results are unvetted self-assessments. The report explicitly does not rank countries on the success, impact or implementation of their policies, and “did not assess the level of implementation or impact of any given initiative,” meaning real-world outcomes “cannot be evaluated,” it said. The survey also contains no questions about financing, meaning a country can report including refugees in its national health policy while allocating no dedicated budget to deliver on it. “Rather than ranking countries on their progress,” the report notes, it seeks to identify how key gaps can be addressed going forward. The report comes as conflict, climate change and economic insecurity displace more people than ever before. More than one billion people live as refugees or migrants worldwide, though over 800 million remain within their own borders. There are 405 million international migrants, 36.8 million refugees, 8.4 million asylum seekers and 83.4 million internally displaced people. Dr Santino Severoni, head of WHO’s Special Initiative on Health and Migration and lead author of the report, said it was intended as a roadmap for coordinated action across governments, UN agencies, civil society, academia and migrant communities themselves. “The health of refugees and migrants is not a marginal concern: it is a defining issue of our time,” Severoni said. “By acting now, countries can ensure that refugees and migrants are not left behind, and that health systems are stronger, fairer and more prepared for the future.” Data ’emergency’, exclusion from emergency plans Progress roadmap for the World Health Assembly Resolution on migrant and refugee health. The new report follows a first edition published in 2022, which was a literature review of around 82,000 documents that established the scale of health disparities facing refugees and migrants worldwide. Two further progress checks are planned for 2027 and 2029, ahead of the 2030 deadline set by WHA member states for full implementation. The 2022 report identified fragmented data collection as the central structural obstacle to effective policy. That remains unresolved. Severoni described the situation as “almost an emergency.” “It’s not because data is not collected, but because they are collected in a very fragmented way, which makes it very, very difficult for us to have a full picture,” he said. Just 42% of countries include refugees and migrants in emergency preparedness or disaster risk reduction plans. Irregular migrants – those without legal residency status – are entirely absent from those frameworks, even as the crises that drive displacement, from war to climate-related disasters, intensify. “We cannot talk about refugee and migrant health without also addressing emergencies,” said Dr Chikwe Ihekweazu, WHO’s executive director for health emergencies. “Whether it’s a conflict, a climate-related crisis or an epidemic that forces movement, these crises expose the fragility of health systems and magnify the vulnerabilities of all those already at risk.” Population groups among refugees and migrants included in national health policies,legislation, strategies or plans. “This is not only an equity issue — it is a global health security risk,” he added. Excluding displaced populations from health systems, he said, weakens the collective capacity to detect and respond to outbreaks and crises. “Health does not begin and end at borders.” WHO is calling on governments to strengthen disaggregated health data collection, tailor policies to specific migrant groups including those in irregular situations, involve refugees and migrants in health governance, train health workers in culturally responsive care, and protect and expand financing. “The phenomena of displacement is unfortunately happening more frequently in countries with fragile systems, fragile economies and limited domestic resources,” Severoni said. “There is almost no mention of irregular migrants in those emergency plans and response or in disease risk reductions, there is no systematic approach in assessing the system to see how their system is really functioning, how efficient and effective it is.” “This is really a call for action to keep the promise of sharing a bit of responsibility in managing those emergencies,” he added. Political wave washes away progress Political sentiment in many wealthy nations has turned against expanding access for migrants, refugees and asylees. The report highlights progress in some countries. Chile has embedded migrant community representatives in municipal health councils, with direct input into maternal and mental health priorities. Belgium has run a national intercultural mediation programme since 1999; as of late 2024, 113 trained mediators were working across 76 hospitals and community health centres. Yet the report’s release comes as several wealthy nations move to restrict refugee and migrant healthcare, driven by economic pressures and political campaigns questioning whether asylum seekers and refugees should be entitled to publicly funded care. In the United States, legislation passed in 2025 changed the definition of “eligible alien” for Medicaid eligibility, cutting coverage for many lawfully present immigrants, asylees, refugees, and trafficking and domestic violence survivors. On 1 May, its northern neighbour Canada will start requiring refugees and asylum seekers to pay out of pocket for essential health services previously covered under its Interim Federal Health Program. The programme “has provided basic health coverage to people fleeing war, genocide, torture, and persecution since 1957,” according to the Migrant Rights Network. Services affected include medications, dental care, mental health, vision and physiotherapy. Across the Atlantic, Germany extended to 36 months the period in which asylum seekers are restricted to emergency-only care, doubling the previous threshold of 18 months. In France, a similar fight is playing out over the future of its Aide Médicale de l’État programme, which provides medical care to undocumented migrants. Critics say the programme encourages migration and is an undue cost to taxpayers, though it accounts for just 0.5% of national public health spending. International funding for refugee health has also fallen sharply. UNHCR’s 2025 budget stands at $10.6 billion, of which only 23% had been secured at mid-year. The agency has warned that up to 12.8 million displaced people could be left without life-saving health interventions this year. “Around the world, more than one billion people are on the move, seeking safety, opportunity and dignity,” Tedros said. “Investing in refugee and migrant health is both ethically essential and strategically beneficial. Supporting their health and inclusion strengthens health systems and benefits everyone.” Image Credits: Wikipedia Commons. Pandemic Agreement Talks Get Five More Negotiating Days 30/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, addressing IGWG6 on Saturday evening. With no agreement in sight, World Health Organization (WHO) member states curtailed talks on the Pandemic Agreement annex five hours earlier than scheduled on Saturday night, resolving to meet again within a month for a further five days of negotiations. Member states will reconvene between 27 April and 1 May to negotiate further on the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) annex, with the hope of tabling the annex at the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May. The PABS annex is intended to ensure, on equal footing, the rapid sharing of pathogens with pandemic potential and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their use, including vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics. Addressing the tired delegates of the Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) after six days of intense talks, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that their efforts had not been wasted. “At the same time, we must be candid,” said Tedros. “Despite best efforts, differences remain on key issues. These are not trivial matters. They go to the heart of equity, access, sovereignty and global solidarity. It’s therefore understandable that more time is needed to bridge these gaps in a meaningful and durable way.” Tedros expressed support for IGWG’s decision to resume negotiations in about four weeks. “This pause is not a setback. It’s an opportunity. It allows us to reflect, to consult further with our capitals, and to return with renewed clarity and flexibility, not to keep negotiating indefinitely, but to continue and to close the deal.” However, tension was palpable at the start of the sixth – and supposedly final – round of talks last Monday when the African region rejected the Bureau’s draft of the PABS Annex. Leading Africa’s position, South Africa and Namibia proposed that the draft text circulated by the IGWG Bureau on 9 March should be disregarded in favour of the on-screen text considered at the end of the fifth IGWG meeting on 14 February. African regional ambassadors had resolved to stick to this text as they had not had time to consult their capitals on the new draft, Namibia reported. After some tension during the closed session, member states accepted this position. The message from one African country after another was that they would not allow a repeat of the inequity seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, and would not compromise on certain key issues. These include that the countries sharing pathogens need guaranteed benefits, and that the PABS annex needs “legal certainty”, including contracts for commercial users of pathogen information. Burkina Faso, speaking for the WHO Africa and Egypt, Sudan, Libya and Somalia, noted that registration should be mandatory for all users of the PABS system, benefit-sharing obligations should be clearer, and there should be more capcity-building –including technology transfer – for developing countries. New Funding Models Needed as Global Health Faces Growing Financial Strain 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Christoph Benn (left) and Patrick Silborn Global health is facing a funding crisis. Aid is shrinking, debt is rising, and the needs are only increasing. According to Christoph Benn of the Joep Lange Institute and Patrik Silborn of UNICEF Afghanistan, health systems will need to fundamentally rethink how they finance and sustain care. On a recent episode of the Global Health Matters podcast, host Gary Aslanyan was joined by these two experts, who said “innovative finance” has become central to discussions on sustaining health systems. Benn said that while the term is widely used, few agree on what it actually means. He described it as a “spectrum” of approaches, ranging from philanthropic grants and conditional funding to private-sector investment models that expect financial returns. “It has frustrated us deeply that so many people are talking about innovative finance, but very few actually know what they’re talking about,” Benn said. Silborn emphasised that these mechanisms should not be treated as one-size-fits-all solutions. Instead, financing models must be designed around specific problems whether that means raising new funds, improving efficiency, or linking payments to measurable outcomes. Drawing on his experience in Rwanda, Silborn described how a results-based funding model tied disbursements directly to performance, helping the country to maintain progress against major diseases despite reduced funding. Both experts stressed that private-sector engagement requires a clear understanding of incentives. “Private corporations are not charities,” Benn said. They can, however, contribute through marketing partnerships, technical expertise, or investment models that align financial returns with social outcomes. Looking ahead, Benn pointed to targeted taxes and debt swaps as among the most scalable tools. Still, both warned that innovative finance is not a substitute for public responsibility. “It only works when it is designed to solve real problems in specific contexts,” Benn said, underscoring that strong systems and governance remain essential to any lasting solution. Listen to the full episode >> Read more about Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Global Health Needs Rethink as Systems Fall Behind 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Dr Garry Aslanyan and Axel R. Pries Global health leaders say the world needs to rethink how it approaches health, arguing that outdated systems, narrow thinking, and lack of coordination are slowing progress at a time of growing challenges. Speaking on the Global Health Matters podcast, Axel Pries, president of the World Health Summit, told host Dr Gary Aslanyan that improving health outcomes will require broader cooperation across sectors, stronger communication, and a shift toward prevention. Listen to the full episode >> Pries said it was “clear that we needed politics, civil society and also the private sector.” He argued that global health can no longer be driven by governments and medical professionals alone, and that progress depends on open collaboration between actors with different interests. While concerns remain, especially around the private sector, he said these partnerships are key to turning research into real-world results. He also pointed to shifting global power, saying institutions created after World War II need to adapt to a more multipolar world. Countries like India, Brazil, and those across Africa should have a bigger role in shaping global health. At the same time, he said core values, especially a shared commitment to health equity, must stay the same. Pries also highlighted challenges in how global health is communicated. Too often, the term is misunderstood as a niche issue affecting distant regions, rather than something that directly impacts everyday life. “It’s everything, everywhere. It’s at our doorstep,” Pries said. Looking ahead, he called for greater engagement from finance and political leaders, and a stronger focus on prevention rather than crisis response.Without that shift, he warned, health systems will remain reactive rather than resilient. Listen to more Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Available Cervical Cancer Vaccines Fail to Cover the HPV 35 Genotype Common in Africa 26/03/2026 Elaine Ruth Fletcher “Cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity:” Ambassador Leslie Ramsammy, Guyana (center). Left, UN Ambassadors Clara Delgado and Antje Leenderste of Capo Verde and Germany. Right, CeHDI CEO Haileyesus Getahun and Colin Murdoch, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean Statees (OECS). The Human papillomavirus (HPV35), globally associated with only 2% of invasive cervical cancers (ICC), has a disproportionately higher prevalence in sub‐Saharan Africa, reaching rates of 22-30% in some countries among women with ICC lesions, according to a new study. Recently, a high-level panel called for redoubled efforts in HPV vaccination, screening and treatment to meet the WHO Global Strategy targets for 2030 – and eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 worldwide. Midway along the route toward the WHO 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination, some 340,000 women a year, mostly in low-income countries, are still dying from cervical cancer – due to the dearth of simple solutions like screening, treatment off pre-cancerous cells, and low HPV vaccination coverage for adolescent girls. Meanwhile, HPV 35—a genotype of the HPV virus that is steadily spreading throughout Africa—is not targeted by existing vaccine formulations. This highlights the urgent need to speed up research and development to create an updated vaccine. At the same time, success stories from a handful of developing countries such as Rwanda demonstrate that the 2030 targets for 90% HPV vaccine coverage, 70% screening and 90% treatment can be attained – when political will exists. Meeting those targets would put countries on track to meeting the global elimination goal of less than 4 cervical cancer cases annually per 100 000 women as early as 2050. Those were key messages emerging from a recent high-level seminar on a Cervical Cancer-Free Future, convened by the Center for Global Health Development and Inclusion (CeHDI) together with the UN in Geneva ambassadors of Barbados, Germany, Guyana and Malawi. “Although cervical cancer is both preventable and curable when detected early, it remains the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death among women worldwide,” said Guyana’s ambassador, Leslie Ramsammy. “In Guyana, for example, it is the number two cause of cancer deaths among women. For some countries, it’s the number one cause of cancer death among women each year.” About 600,000 women annually are diagnosed with cervical cancer, representing 6.5% of new cancer cases and 7.7% of cancer deaths. And 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. As such, “cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity,” he added. The goal: global elimination of cervical cancer by 2050 Countries must reach the WHO 2030 targets for diagnosis and treatment in order to reach the goal of cervical cancer elimination by 2050. Most developed countries are on a trajectory to meet the WHO 2030 goals and moving on from there, to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health risk by 2050. However, developing countries are on a much longer trajectory. And at current rates of progress, most will only reach elimination in 2120, said Ramsammy. “Today’s High-Level dialog is a call to change the trajectory for elimination from 2120 to earlier… closer to 2050 when many European countries and North America would have achieved elimination.” Said Ramsammy, “The question is no longer whether cervical cancer can be eliminated, but when and whether the world will mobilize the political will and resources needed to ensure that no woman dies from a preventable disease. Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer.” Incidence rates in African countries 10–20 times higher than 2030 goal Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are heavily concentrated in low-and middle-incomee countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most developed countries already have a cervical cancer incidence of between 10-4 cases annually per 100 000 women – with 4/100 000 being the elimination threshold. But many countries in Africa have cervical cancer incidence of 60-70 or even eighty cases annually per 100 000 women, said Nathalie Broutet, of the University of Sydney, Australia, citing Malawi and Eswatini as examples. As a former WHO staff member, Broutet helped draft the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2020. To get on course for elimination “we need to reach the 2030 targets, which are 90% HPV vaccination coverage; 70% of women screened with a high performance, twice in a lifetime; and 90% of women detected with a cervical disease treated,” she said. In terms of vaccination, for instance, apart from the region of the Americas, which has almost reached 80% coverage, all other WHO regions remain far behind the 90% goal for 2030. “So, the work that we have to do to reach 90% is enormous,” said Broutet. Better adapted vaccines – the missing HPV 35 genotype Nathalie Broutet, University of Sydney aand former WHO cervical cancer specialist. However, along with more uptake of HPV vaccination, HPV vaccines need to be better adapted to the needs of girls and women in low- and middle–income populations. And recent research undertaken by CeHDI together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is pointing to a big gap in Africa. That is the lack of vaccine coverage for the HPV 35 genotype, which now a common subtype of the virus in Africa, in comparison to the rest of the world. “This is a genotype which is very common in African countries, which is responsible for around even more than 4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa,” said Broutet. “Yet this genotype is not included in the current HPV vaccine.” One brand-new study points to an even higher incidence, said Haileyesus Getahun, CEO of CeHDI, citing a new review of the “Burden of HPV 35 in African Cervical Pathologies” in the journal Medical Virology. That peer-reviewed study published this month, cites HPV35 prevalence of 19-30% in Mozambique, 22-26% in Kenya, 17% in South Africa and 11% in Zimbabwe and Tanzania among women with ICC lesions. In women with pre-cancerous lesions, rates of 20-26% were found in Botswana and Tanzania. In sharp contrast, studies from China, Canada, Sweden and Europe pointed to a prevalence of less than 1%. Globally, the prevalence among women with ICC lesions was only 2%. “Specifically, HPV35 has been more frequently associated with precancerous cervical lesions and accounts for a significant proportion of ICC [invasive cervical carcinoma] (4%–10%) in these populations, with a higher fraction than that observed in other regions,” concludes the authors from the University of Cape Town, South Africa; as well as medical research faculties in Tanzania, Botswana and Zimbabwe. HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer. Overcoming the key problems in service delivery For cervical cancer, school-based HPV vaccination delivery is critical. There are cited three key problems in service delivery, vaccination gaps, lack of access to low-cost HPV testing and related laboratory services; and lack of access to cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, which are out of reach in most rural clinics and in the public health systems of many urban centres. To overcome the challenges, global experts recommend the following: School-based vaccination – This is the first time a vaccine must be delivered to an adolescent population, leading to challenges with both disinformation as well as the need to put new systems in place. “We know in countries that use school- based delivery has been quite a success,” said Broutet. “Gender-neutral vaccination can improve the coverage and lift barriers that we see regarding the HPV vaccination of girls-only; and strong community engagement – communication needs to be in place. In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Shift from Pap smears to HPV testing – In high income countries with high rates of cervical cancer screening, the most used test remains the Pap smear – a cytology-based test. In low income countries BIA or bioimpedance screening, which uses electrical signals to detect abnormal cells, has been widely used as well due to its low–cost and rapid results. But WHO as well as many national health systems are now recommending a shift to HPV testing, widely regarded as more accurate and ultimately more cost-efficient. That involves testing specifically for the human papillomavirus genotypes that are the most common cause of cancer. “Even in countries that we think reach 70% coverage, there is a lot of work to be done to switch out the existing technology, which is basically cytology, and in low-income countries, BIA. Instead, all countries need to switch toward HPV testing,” says Broutet. “And we need also to ensure that innovation is available, and one of them is self-sampling, so self-collection and also urine samples. We need to ensure that all countries have access to this technology.” Self-screening and community-based treatment – Treatment immediately following screening is the third basic tool needed to reach elimination targets. Such treatment can remove pre-cancerous cells before they develop further. “Mobile screening clinics can be an option to increase coverage, task shifting to community health workers,” said Broutet. “This expands coverage. And finally, digital registry [of screening results]. We need to follow up and track women who have been screened to ensure those with a positive test have been treated.” Improving vaccine composition HPV 35 is one of five highly invasive genotypes not now covered by vaccines, responsible for an outsized proportion of cancers in Africa. Improving vaccine composition is also a critical mission, said Getahun. Together with IARC, CeHDI is supporting an even more thorough African and global review of the evidence on the HPV 35 genotype and its burden. “Our collaboration with IARC will help generate the evidence needed to inform the development of next-generation HPV vaccines that better reflect regional disease patterns, including the burden of HPV 35 in sub-Saharan Africa,” he observed. “Going forward we hope this will stimulate dialogue with the manufacturers, countries, WHO and global procurement partners such as Gavi and Unitaid to ensure that this genotype is included in the next generation of vaccines, particularly those deployed in Africa.” Currently, none of the main HPV vaccine manufacturers, which include the UK- and USA-based GSK and MSD(Merck), as well as the Serum Institute of India and two Chinese firms include HPV 35 in their vaccine formulations. However, a 14-valent vaccine by another leading Chinese pharma innovator, Sinocelltech, has a 14-valent vaccine SCT1000 in Phase 3 trials with some 18,000 women, which includes the HPV 35 genotype. “Especially in regions with high HIV prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the application of polyvalent HPV vaccines (including HPV 35) is essential, as people living with HIV are more prone to multiple HPV infections requiring broader protection,” state an October 2025 review by Chiara Paternostro and Elmar Joura, of the Medical University of Vienna. Gavi board: approved inclusion of improved vaccines once available HPV vaccine – Gavi has approved inclusion of improved formulations to protect against more genotypes once available. Asked by Health Policy Watch about the need and potential to update existing vaccines to include the HPV 35 genotype, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, said its board had in 2025 approved the inclusion of improved vaccines covering more virus genotypes in its portfolio as soon as they become available: “Current HPV vaccines are designed to protect against the large majority (70%) of cervical cancers. The importance of this evolving research is that we now have a better understanding of the disease burden of HPV-35 in countries across Africa, which Gavi supports – as well as how that burden is expected to increase over time as other types decrease due to improved vaccine coverage,” a Gavi spokesperson said. “While there are currently no licensed vaccines that provide protection against HPV‑35, the Gavi Board in December 2025 approved, based on WHO and SAGE guidance, an expansion of Gavi’s portfolio so that higher-valent vaccines can be made available to countries as and when they come available. We encourage our manufacturing partners to work with us in helping bring this about.” WHO pointed to a recent systematic review by WHO/IARC (Wei et al. 2024) confirming that HPV35 is part of the remaining known 10 HPV causal genotypes, it causes only about 5% of cases worldwide, “but with some notable regional variations, including a higher proportion (~4%) for HPV 35 in Africa than in other regions.” “Currently, HPV35 is not among the types covered in the two existing, licensed (highest valency) HPV9 vaccines that contain the same 7 oncogenic types (16,18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58),” a spokesperson said. “We are aware additional work is being done on HPV35 that may provide more information on this strain and its contribution to cervical cancer burden– in particular, in the African region. In future that may inform vaccine developers in their choice for additional HPV type to be included in ‘even higher valency’.” Rwanda: on track to beat 2050 global elimination target Two girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka, Rwanda, a country that is on track to reach the 2050 goal for cervical cancer elimination. But vaccination is not in itself an answer. It must be part of a multi-pronged approach. “Over the next 50 years, scaling up screening and treatment could avert up to 14.6 million deaths, three times more than vaccination alone,” noted Cabo Verde’s UN Ambassador in Geneva Clara Delgado and a member of the Unitaid Executive Board. Since 2019, Unitaid has introduced HPV testing, self-sampling methods and portable thermal ablation treatment devices (for removal of precancerous lesions) across approximately 50 low- and middle income countries, driving down costs significantly.” Bulk procurement has reduced HPV test prices by 40% and the costs of thermal ablation by 45% “making these lifesaving tools affordable where they are needed most.” But just as important are country models that work, she stressed, citing Rwanda, South Africa, Malawi and the Philippines as “champion” examples. “For example, in Rwanda with Unitaid’s partnership since 2019, a national screen and treat program now operates in over half of the country. Women in rural communities are being reached through HPV self-collection kits, a simple, dignified approach that brings services closer to home, breaking barriers of distance, stigma and cost. As a result of the partnership, Rwanda is on track to beat the 2030 elimination targets by three years, “proving that elimination is not just possible, but achievable.” Repeating the success of smallpox eradication “Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer by 2050,” said Ramsammy, “Today we have an opportunity to elevate cervical cancer elimination on the multilateral agenda as a matter of equity, gender justice and the right to health.” Said Getahun, “At a time when global solidarity and multilateralism are under strain, health diplomacy is more important than ever in strengthening North–South and South–South cooperation and advancing the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer.” Adds Broutet, “We have a generation to end cervical cancer, and we have the tools,” citing national elimination targets; sustainable financing; regional cooperation to decrease the price of the tools and investing in treatment infrastructure as key political levers. “The science exists, the roadmap exists, but the inequity persists. Political will determines the outcome.” Most important is the need to address gender inequities. “Each country of the world needs to understand, what are these drivers of inequity in their own country?” she said, citing the late WHO director Mahmoud Fathalla, who once said: “women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. They are dying because societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.” Image Credits: UNICEF, WHO , N. Broutet/WHO, ecancer.org, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, Broutet, Gavi, HPV World . US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Two-Speed Multilateralism: Breaking the Deadlock on Climate and Health 31/03/2026 Felix Sassmannshausen Panellists Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum (WHO, stage centre), Miguel Ruiz Botero (Colombian UN Mission, stage right), Margarita Gutierrez (IISD, screen left), Ömer Öztürk (Türkiye Min. of Environment, screen right), and Gül Mersinlioğlu Serin (Türkiye Minister of Health, screen centre) discussing two-speed multilateralism in Geneva. From stalled Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) negotiations to failing consensus in global climate policies, United Nations structures face a profound crisis. Diplomats are currently being forced to explore alternative governance models to bridge the disconnect between sluggish, power-driven diplomacy and the rapid, equitable action required in health and climate crises. This institutional rupture and the resulting emergence of two-speed multilateralism took centre stage during a critical panel hosted by the Global Health Centre in Geneva on 30 March. Professor Suerie Moon delivers opening remarks at the event. “The world order and the postwar institutions that were created to address global problems are at a unique moment of rupture, possibly collapse or transformation, depending on where we go from here,” said Professor Suerie Moon, co-director of the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute, during her opening remarks of the expert panel discussion. The event was co-hosted by the Centre’s International Geneva Global Health Platform, alongside the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the Geneva Environment Network. There was clear unity among the expert panellists – ranging from global health researchers and climate adaptation advisors to international diplomats – that when traditional, consensus-based multilateralism stagnates, the international community must pragmatically turn to alternative, faster diplomatic channels. Two-speed multilateralism: agile coalitions accelerate implementation, while universal consensus provides global legal legitimacy. This “two-speed multilateralism” combines the universal legitimacy of consensus-based UN negotiations with the rapid implementation capabilities of smaller, highly ambitious “coalitions of the willing”, aiming at preventing single nations from vetoing desperately needed progress on environmental and public health protections. Miguel Ruiz Botero argues for the need of two-speed multilateralism because some nations weaponize consensus to obstruct global progress. “Consensus has been, in essence, weaponised by a few countries to obstruct progress,” said Miguel Ruiz Botero, second secretary at the Permanent Mission of Colombia to the UN in Geneva, during the panel discussion. For example, as global temperatures reach record levels, experts argue that traditional structures are simply not mobilising political action fast enough to protect vulnerable populations affected by climate change. To bypass this gridlock, Colombia is hosting the Santa Marta Conference on 28-29 April, which will serve as a prime example of this accelerated diplomatic speed. Co-hosted by the Netherlands, the summit aims to establish a clear pathway for transitioning away from fossil fuels outside the traditional UN architecture. This parallel track aims to establish a strict division of diplomatic labour, as COP30 President André Aranha Corrêa do Lago recently outlined. While the “first tier” ensures universal legitimacy and sets the collective legal direction, the “second tier,” or fast track tier, focusses exclusively on rapid implementation by mobilising finance and deploying solutions at scale without reopening debates already settled by consensus. WHO support for two-speed approach Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum (WHO) argues that health-based fossil fuel transitions offer immense, self-financing benefits. Notably, the WHO voiced clear support for this parallel approach. “If a certain subset of parties or countries can take a part of the agenda that moves things in a positive way, then you know that has to be supported,” said Dr Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum, WHO head of the climate change, energy and air quality unit. He noted that the health gains from reducing air pollution would effectively cover the costs of transitioning away from fossil fuels, making a compelling, evidence-based case for this accelerated track. Key Moments for Climate and Health Diplomacy in 2026 This decisive backing for initiatives outside the formal UN architecture is unusual for an agency traditionally restrained by universal consensus. However, in private discussions following the event, experts observed that the WHO is navigating new political dynamics. Following the US exit, the institution may be experiencing reduced diplomatic pressure, inadvertently allowing it to embrace more pragmatic, parallel agreements without its usual hesitation. This momentum will continue at the upcoming 79th World Health Assembly in May. While the WHO will not formally report on its “Global Action Plan on Climate Change and Health” during the main agenda, Türkiye and Brazil are set to co-host a high-level side event to fill the gap and strengthen the integration of the health and climate dossiers ahead of the COP31 summit in November 2026. Bypassing slow paced consensus is not new The panellists discussed that while two-speed multilateralism is an old tool, the 2026 rupture makes it a necessity. The strategy of utilizing alternative diplomatic pathways to bypass institutional gridlock is not a novel invention. “Two-speed multilateralism is certainly not a new phenomenon,” said Moon. “Ever since the UN was founded 80 years ago, there have been parallel bilateral and minilateral processes that work alongside global multilateral processes.” In recent decades, parallel negotiations and smaller alliances have historically operated alongside universal frameworks to influence broader international arenas. When traditional consensus rules made a UN-based landmine convention impossible in the late 1990s, Canada and a group of progressive nations moved negotiations outside the formal architecture to create the Ottawa Process. This historical success, alongside the eventual adoption of the Arms Trade Treaty by the UN General Assembly, demonstrates how coalitions of the willing can effectively force meaningful international agreements when broad consensus fails, explained Colombia’s representative Botero. The upcoming Santa Marta conference will act as the first major testing ground for establishing this diplomatic strategy in climate policies. Unlike exclusive diplomatic clubs where powerful nations make decisions behind closed doors, this approach remains open to states ready to act. Integrating health into climate action Ultimately, these efforts aim to create a push-pull dynamic that elevates the baseline ambition of the entire international community. Gül Mersinlioğlu Serin from the Ministry of Health, Türkiye highlights the synergy between UN legitimacy and voluntary coalitions. “We see value in both tracks, the inclusiveness and legitimacy of the UN system alongside the dynamism of the coalition of voluntary initiatives that can accelerate progress,” said Dr Gül Mersinlioğlu Serin, a health expert at the Turkish Ministry of Health. However, securing these baseline commitments – and breaking down two decades of silos between climate and health negotiations – remains challenging. Despite these hurdles, the recent COP30 summit in Belém, Brazil, delivered clear progress by finalising the Baku Adaptation Roadmap and establishing 59 voluntary indicators for the Global Goal on Adaptation. This allows the international community to measure climate impacts through human health metrics, such as heat-related mortality and local health system resilience, explained Ömer Öztürk, head of adaptation to climate change and local policies at the Turkish Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change. Expanding action through local health WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus speaking at COP30 in Belém, which launched he Belém Health Action Plan. The Belém Health Action Plan established a critical framework for building low-carbon, climate-resilient health systems, effectively translating slow-moving global agreements into on-the-ground implementation. By targeting surveillance, capacity-building, and digital innovation, the plan ensures adaptation measures actively address severe health inequities. To successfully execute these measures at an accelerated pace, experts argue that broad climate goals must be communicated in terms that specific sectoral ministries understand. Margarita Gutierrez (IISD) emphasizes the need to translate climate goals into health-specific language. “This is a translation, this is different language and this happens with all the sectors,” said Margarita Gutierrez, policy advisor for Friends of Climate and Health at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, emphasising that mainstreaming climate considerations into everyday sectoral policies provides a crucial opportunity to coordinate joint actions. However, Gutierrez warned that unless countries actively integrate these health metrics into their formal UN commitments – such as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) – securing health’s relevance and funding on future global agendas will remain incredibly difficult. But as amending these universal UN agreements is a years-long bureaucratic process, experts argue that fast-track, parallel coalitions are urgently needed to bypass the gridlock and deploy health solutions immediately. Rebuilding trust through equitable cooperation Small developing island states are highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change and rely on universal diplomatic processes to ensure they hold equal weight to major global powers. However, building on two-speed multilateralism and operating outside universal frameworks carries significant risks, prompting debates about fragmentation and the potential exclusion of smaller developing nations. “Considering, for example, that small island developing states are some of the most vulnerable to climate change, it’s really important that they have the equal weight to be able to stop the process,” said WHO’s Campbell-Lendrum, arguing that universal forums allow vulnerable nations to demand the same attention as major powers. Margot Morris highlights Australia’s commitment to supporting climate-health cooperation with Pacific island nations. To ensure these frontline voices are not lost, diplomats are actively elevating regional priorities. Highlighting this effort, Australia, presiding over the negotiations at the COP31 summit, announced that it is cooperating with Pacific islands to support a pre-COP31 gathering. “We are working hand in hand with Pacific Island Forum members and regional organisations to shine a global spotlight on our region,” said Margot Morris, counsellor at the Permanent Mission of Australia to the UN. As the Geneva event concluded with characteristic sober pragmatism, the underlying message was clear: by ensuring rapid progress does not come at the expense of equity, two-speed multilateralism could help counter the climate crisis and stabilise the deeply fractured international order. Image Credits: Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana , Unsplash/Ernests Vaga. New Open Source AI Platform Aims to Accelerate Malaria Drug Discovery 31/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan A health worker examines a child with suspected malaria. Scientists working on new malaria drugs now have access to an open-access artificial intelligence (AI)-powered platform aimed at accelerating drug discovery, thanks to a partnership between Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) and deepmirror. Drug Design for Global Health (dd4gh) uses “both predictive and generative AI to give researchers, especially those in the most resource-limited settings, access to cutting-edge technology that would otherwise be out of reach”, according to a media release from MMV. The dd4gh platform was developed using input gathered during co‑creation workshops in Ghana and Switzerland with global drug discovery researchers. Its AI models are trained on data sets from a wide range of studies conducted by global health researchers, enabling scientists to benefit from insights generated across multiple research efforts. “At a time when the global health sector is facing significant constraints, dd4gh demonstrates the power of partnership,” said MMV CEO Dr Martin Fitchet. “By giving scientists in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) free access to advanced AI tools, we can accelerate the discovery of lifesaving medicines led by the people closest to the diseases we are trying to defeat.” The platform implements active learning, a technique that allows AI and machine learning (ML) to continuously improve its predictions by learning from new data. It analyses large data sets and proposes the most promising compounds to explore in the lab. Shorter timelines, reduced costs These technologies have the potential to dramatically shorten timelines and reduce costs for drug discovery, allowing scientists to focus their time and resources on what is more likely to work, enabling faster discovery of treatments for diseases that pose significant global health challenges. “Africa is disproportionately affected by many infectious and non-infectious diseases, yet African-led solutions are limited. Tools like dd4gh can have a transformative impact on the continent’s capacity for drug discovery research,” said Prof Richard Amewu, lead of the drug innovation group at the University of Ghana, which tested the platform. Dr Godwin Dziwornu, senior investigator in medicinal chemistry at the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) H3D, said that the platform is “easy to access and user-friendly”. Dziwornu added: “I’ve found it very useful in two main areas: generating new compound designs and the models available to assess compound properties and predict their drug likeness to solve a particular liability, for example, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. This helps me guide my decisions to synthesise high-quality compounds, saving me precious time and resources.” Caroline Maina, a UCT PhD candidate and participant in a co-creation workshop, said there are other AI tools that can help with drug discovery “but being in a resource-limited setting makes purchasing a license prohibitive”. “Making dd4gh open access for researchers in global health means more of us can explore new ideas and apply AI to finding treatments for diseases that are part of our everyday realities,” said Maina. Dr Max Jakobs, co-founder and CEO of deepmirror, said the free platform aims to strengthen “a more inclusive global scientific ecosystem” as “access to advanced AI should not depend on where a scientist works or their laboratory’s resources”. deepmirror builds chemistry-based foundation models for biopharma and research organisations to support active drug discovery programmes. It integrates predictive and generative AI directly into research workflows, combining “proprietary data with models trained on larger, curated datasets, which are continuously updated and strengthened over time”. MMV is a not-for-profit product development partnership working to discover, develop and deliver medicines to treat, prevent and eliminate malaria. Since 1999, its co-developed medicines have helped 1.3 billion people. Image Credits: Tommy Trenchard/ Global Fund, Damien Schumann / MMV. More Countries Refer to Refugees in Health Policies, but Access and Data Gaps Persist 30/03/2026 Stefan Anderson First global survey of 93 nations shows two-thirds include these populations in health plans, but none provide equal access to undocumented migrants. More than 60 countries now include refugees and migrants in their national health policies, according to a new World Health Organization (WHO) report tracking progress on commitments first set out by the World Health Assembly in 2019. The finding, drawn from a survey of 93 member states, is the first systematic count of how countries are implementing a resolution that called on governments to ensure refugees and migrants have access to health services, are included in national health planning, and are counted in health data systems. “Many countries have begun integrating refugee and migrant health into national strategies,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “Yet gaps remain, particularly in collecting and using migration-related health data, ensuring participation of refugees and migrants in decision-making, and guaranteeing access to care for all, regardless of legal status.” “Like anyone else, refugees and migrants need uninterrupted, affordable and equitable access to health services wherever they are,” Tedros said. While WHO called the findings “encouraging,” the picture the report paints is difficult to read clearly. What “inclusion in a national health policy” actually means for care access for migrants and refugees varies widely – and the report does not name which countries fall where. Two-thirds of the 93 surveyed countries said they include refugees and migrants in their health policies. When asked what level of access different groups receive, 16 countries said refugees can access services on a par with the host population, 14 extended that standard to documented migrant workers, and 11 to asylum seekers. No country surveyed reported providing equal access to migrants in irregular situations – those living without legal status or formal documentation. The positive examples the report does name – from Belgium to Chile – are presented as case studies. Only 37% of countries routinely collect and disseminate migration-related health data. Fewer than 40% train health workers in culturally responsive care. Just 30% have run campaigns to counter misinformation or discrimination, the report found. The report is the first systematic quantification of these indicators, further blurring the picture of progress, as there is no baseline to compare against. The data is also entirely drawn from a voluntary survey completed by member states with no independent verification, meaning the results are unvetted self-assessments. The report explicitly does not rank countries on the success, impact or implementation of their policies, and “did not assess the level of implementation or impact of any given initiative,” meaning real-world outcomes “cannot be evaluated,” it said. The survey also contains no questions about financing, meaning a country can report including refugees in its national health policy while allocating no dedicated budget to deliver on it. “Rather than ranking countries on their progress,” the report notes, it seeks to identify how key gaps can be addressed going forward. The report comes as conflict, climate change and economic insecurity displace more people than ever before. More than one billion people live as refugees or migrants worldwide, though over 800 million remain within their own borders. There are 405 million international migrants, 36.8 million refugees, 8.4 million asylum seekers and 83.4 million internally displaced people. Dr Santino Severoni, head of WHO’s Special Initiative on Health and Migration and lead author of the report, said it was intended as a roadmap for coordinated action across governments, UN agencies, civil society, academia and migrant communities themselves. “The health of refugees and migrants is not a marginal concern: it is a defining issue of our time,” Severoni said. “By acting now, countries can ensure that refugees and migrants are not left behind, and that health systems are stronger, fairer and more prepared for the future.” Data ’emergency’, exclusion from emergency plans Progress roadmap for the World Health Assembly Resolution on migrant and refugee health. The new report follows a first edition published in 2022, which was a literature review of around 82,000 documents that established the scale of health disparities facing refugees and migrants worldwide. Two further progress checks are planned for 2027 and 2029, ahead of the 2030 deadline set by WHA member states for full implementation. The 2022 report identified fragmented data collection as the central structural obstacle to effective policy. That remains unresolved. Severoni described the situation as “almost an emergency.” “It’s not because data is not collected, but because they are collected in a very fragmented way, which makes it very, very difficult for us to have a full picture,” he said. Just 42% of countries include refugees and migrants in emergency preparedness or disaster risk reduction plans. Irregular migrants – those without legal residency status – are entirely absent from those frameworks, even as the crises that drive displacement, from war to climate-related disasters, intensify. “We cannot talk about refugee and migrant health without also addressing emergencies,” said Dr Chikwe Ihekweazu, WHO’s executive director for health emergencies. “Whether it’s a conflict, a climate-related crisis or an epidemic that forces movement, these crises expose the fragility of health systems and magnify the vulnerabilities of all those already at risk.” Population groups among refugees and migrants included in national health policies,legislation, strategies or plans. “This is not only an equity issue — it is a global health security risk,” he added. Excluding displaced populations from health systems, he said, weakens the collective capacity to detect and respond to outbreaks and crises. “Health does not begin and end at borders.” WHO is calling on governments to strengthen disaggregated health data collection, tailor policies to specific migrant groups including those in irregular situations, involve refugees and migrants in health governance, train health workers in culturally responsive care, and protect and expand financing. “The phenomena of displacement is unfortunately happening more frequently in countries with fragile systems, fragile economies and limited domestic resources,” Severoni said. “There is almost no mention of irregular migrants in those emergency plans and response or in disease risk reductions, there is no systematic approach in assessing the system to see how their system is really functioning, how efficient and effective it is.” “This is really a call for action to keep the promise of sharing a bit of responsibility in managing those emergencies,” he added. Political wave washes away progress Political sentiment in many wealthy nations has turned against expanding access for migrants, refugees and asylees. The report highlights progress in some countries. Chile has embedded migrant community representatives in municipal health councils, with direct input into maternal and mental health priorities. Belgium has run a national intercultural mediation programme since 1999; as of late 2024, 113 trained mediators were working across 76 hospitals and community health centres. Yet the report’s release comes as several wealthy nations move to restrict refugee and migrant healthcare, driven by economic pressures and political campaigns questioning whether asylum seekers and refugees should be entitled to publicly funded care. In the United States, legislation passed in 2025 changed the definition of “eligible alien” for Medicaid eligibility, cutting coverage for many lawfully present immigrants, asylees, refugees, and trafficking and domestic violence survivors. On 1 May, its northern neighbour Canada will start requiring refugees and asylum seekers to pay out of pocket for essential health services previously covered under its Interim Federal Health Program. The programme “has provided basic health coverage to people fleeing war, genocide, torture, and persecution since 1957,” according to the Migrant Rights Network. Services affected include medications, dental care, mental health, vision and physiotherapy. Across the Atlantic, Germany extended to 36 months the period in which asylum seekers are restricted to emergency-only care, doubling the previous threshold of 18 months. In France, a similar fight is playing out over the future of its Aide Médicale de l’État programme, which provides medical care to undocumented migrants. Critics say the programme encourages migration and is an undue cost to taxpayers, though it accounts for just 0.5% of national public health spending. International funding for refugee health has also fallen sharply. UNHCR’s 2025 budget stands at $10.6 billion, of which only 23% had been secured at mid-year. The agency has warned that up to 12.8 million displaced people could be left without life-saving health interventions this year. “Around the world, more than one billion people are on the move, seeking safety, opportunity and dignity,” Tedros said. “Investing in refugee and migrant health is both ethically essential and strategically beneficial. Supporting their health and inclusion strengthens health systems and benefits everyone.” Image Credits: Wikipedia Commons. Pandemic Agreement Talks Get Five More Negotiating Days 30/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, addressing IGWG6 on Saturday evening. With no agreement in sight, World Health Organization (WHO) member states curtailed talks on the Pandemic Agreement annex five hours earlier than scheduled on Saturday night, resolving to meet again within a month for a further five days of negotiations. Member states will reconvene between 27 April and 1 May to negotiate further on the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) annex, with the hope of tabling the annex at the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May. The PABS annex is intended to ensure, on equal footing, the rapid sharing of pathogens with pandemic potential and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their use, including vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics. Addressing the tired delegates of the Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) after six days of intense talks, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that their efforts had not been wasted. “At the same time, we must be candid,” said Tedros. “Despite best efforts, differences remain on key issues. These are not trivial matters. They go to the heart of equity, access, sovereignty and global solidarity. It’s therefore understandable that more time is needed to bridge these gaps in a meaningful and durable way.” Tedros expressed support for IGWG’s decision to resume negotiations in about four weeks. “This pause is not a setback. It’s an opportunity. It allows us to reflect, to consult further with our capitals, and to return with renewed clarity and flexibility, not to keep negotiating indefinitely, but to continue and to close the deal.” However, tension was palpable at the start of the sixth – and supposedly final – round of talks last Monday when the African region rejected the Bureau’s draft of the PABS Annex. Leading Africa’s position, South Africa and Namibia proposed that the draft text circulated by the IGWG Bureau on 9 March should be disregarded in favour of the on-screen text considered at the end of the fifth IGWG meeting on 14 February. African regional ambassadors had resolved to stick to this text as they had not had time to consult their capitals on the new draft, Namibia reported. After some tension during the closed session, member states accepted this position. The message from one African country after another was that they would not allow a repeat of the inequity seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, and would not compromise on certain key issues. These include that the countries sharing pathogens need guaranteed benefits, and that the PABS annex needs “legal certainty”, including contracts for commercial users of pathogen information. Burkina Faso, speaking for the WHO Africa and Egypt, Sudan, Libya and Somalia, noted that registration should be mandatory for all users of the PABS system, benefit-sharing obligations should be clearer, and there should be more capcity-building –including technology transfer – for developing countries. New Funding Models Needed as Global Health Faces Growing Financial Strain 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Christoph Benn (left) and Patrick Silborn Global health is facing a funding crisis. Aid is shrinking, debt is rising, and the needs are only increasing. According to Christoph Benn of the Joep Lange Institute and Patrik Silborn of UNICEF Afghanistan, health systems will need to fundamentally rethink how they finance and sustain care. On a recent episode of the Global Health Matters podcast, host Gary Aslanyan was joined by these two experts, who said “innovative finance” has become central to discussions on sustaining health systems. Benn said that while the term is widely used, few agree on what it actually means. He described it as a “spectrum” of approaches, ranging from philanthropic grants and conditional funding to private-sector investment models that expect financial returns. “It has frustrated us deeply that so many people are talking about innovative finance, but very few actually know what they’re talking about,” Benn said. Silborn emphasised that these mechanisms should not be treated as one-size-fits-all solutions. Instead, financing models must be designed around specific problems whether that means raising new funds, improving efficiency, or linking payments to measurable outcomes. Drawing on his experience in Rwanda, Silborn described how a results-based funding model tied disbursements directly to performance, helping the country to maintain progress against major diseases despite reduced funding. Both experts stressed that private-sector engagement requires a clear understanding of incentives. “Private corporations are not charities,” Benn said. They can, however, contribute through marketing partnerships, technical expertise, or investment models that align financial returns with social outcomes. Looking ahead, Benn pointed to targeted taxes and debt swaps as among the most scalable tools. Still, both warned that innovative finance is not a substitute for public responsibility. “It only works when it is designed to solve real problems in specific contexts,” Benn said, underscoring that strong systems and governance remain essential to any lasting solution. Listen to the full episode >> Read more about Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Global Health Needs Rethink as Systems Fall Behind 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Dr Garry Aslanyan and Axel R. Pries Global health leaders say the world needs to rethink how it approaches health, arguing that outdated systems, narrow thinking, and lack of coordination are slowing progress at a time of growing challenges. Speaking on the Global Health Matters podcast, Axel Pries, president of the World Health Summit, told host Dr Gary Aslanyan that improving health outcomes will require broader cooperation across sectors, stronger communication, and a shift toward prevention. Listen to the full episode >> Pries said it was “clear that we needed politics, civil society and also the private sector.” He argued that global health can no longer be driven by governments and medical professionals alone, and that progress depends on open collaboration between actors with different interests. While concerns remain, especially around the private sector, he said these partnerships are key to turning research into real-world results. He also pointed to shifting global power, saying institutions created after World War II need to adapt to a more multipolar world. Countries like India, Brazil, and those across Africa should have a bigger role in shaping global health. At the same time, he said core values, especially a shared commitment to health equity, must stay the same. Pries also highlighted challenges in how global health is communicated. Too often, the term is misunderstood as a niche issue affecting distant regions, rather than something that directly impacts everyday life. “It’s everything, everywhere. It’s at our doorstep,” Pries said. Looking ahead, he called for greater engagement from finance and political leaders, and a stronger focus on prevention rather than crisis response.Without that shift, he warned, health systems will remain reactive rather than resilient. Listen to more Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Available Cervical Cancer Vaccines Fail to Cover the HPV 35 Genotype Common in Africa 26/03/2026 Elaine Ruth Fletcher “Cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity:” Ambassador Leslie Ramsammy, Guyana (center). Left, UN Ambassadors Clara Delgado and Antje Leenderste of Capo Verde and Germany. Right, CeHDI CEO Haileyesus Getahun and Colin Murdoch, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean Statees (OECS). The Human papillomavirus (HPV35), globally associated with only 2% of invasive cervical cancers (ICC), has a disproportionately higher prevalence in sub‐Saharan Africa, reaching rates of 22-30% in some countries among women with ICC lesions, according to a new study. Recently, a high-level panel called for redoubled efforts in HPV vaccination, screening and treatment to meet the WHO Global Strategy targets for 2030 – and eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 worldwide. Midway along the route toward the WHO 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination, some 340,000 women a year, mostly in low-income countries, are still dying from cervical cancer – due to the dearth of simple solutions like screening, treatment off pre-cancerous cells, and low HPV vaccination coverage for adolescent girls. Meanwhile, HPV 35—a genotype of the HPV virus that is steadily spreading throughout Africa—is not targeted by existing vaccine formulations. This highlights the urgent need to speed up research and development to create an updated vaccine. At the same time, success stories from a handful of developing countries such as Rwanda demonstrate that the 2030 targets for 90% HPV vaccine coverage, 70% screening and 90% treatment can be attained – when political will exists. Meeting those targets would put countries on track to meeting the global elimination goal of less than 4 cervical cancer cases annually per 100 000 women as early as 2050. Those were key messages emerging from a recent high-level seminar on a Cervical Cancer-Free Future, convened by the Center for Global Health Development and Inclusion (CeHDI) together with the UN in Geneva ambassadors of Barbados, Germany, Guyana and Malawi. “Although cervical cancer is both preventable and curable when detected early, it remains the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death among women worldwide,” said Guyana’s ambassador, Leslie Ramsammy. “In Guyana, for example, it is the number two cause of cancer deaths among women. For some countries, it’s the number one cause of cancer death among women each year.” About 600,000 women annually are diagnosed with cervical cancer, representing 6.5% of new cancer cases and 7.7% of cancer deaths. And 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. As such, “cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity,” he added. The goal: global elimination of cervical cancer by 2050 Countries must reach the WHO 2030 targets for diagnosis and treatment in order to reach the goal of cervical cancer elimination by 2050. Most developed countries are on a trajectory to meet the WHO 2030 goals and moving on from there, to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health risk by 2050. However, developing countries are on a much longer trajectory. And at current rates of progress, most will only reach elimination in 2120, said Ramsammy. “Today’s High-Level dialog is a call to change the trajectory for elimination from 2120 to earlier… closer to 2050 when many European countries and North America would have achieved elimination.” Said Ramsammy, “The question is no longer whether cervical cancer can be eliminated, but when and whether the world will mobilize the political will and resources needed to ensure that no woman dies from a preventable disease. Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer.” Incidence rates in African countries 10–20 times higher than 2030 goal Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are heavily concentrated in low-and middle-incomee countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most developed countries already have a cervical cancer incidence of between 10-4 cases annually per 100 000 women – with 4/100 000 being the elimination threshold. But many countries in Africa have cervical cancer incidence of 60-70 or even eighty cases annually per 100 000 women, said Nathalie Broutet, of the University of Sydney, Australia, citing Malawi and Eswatini as examples. As a former WHO staff member, Broutet helped draft the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2020. To get on course for elimination “we need to reach the 2030 targets, which are 90% HPV vaccination coverage; 70% of women screened with a high performance, twice in a lifetime; and 90% of women detected with a cervical disease treated,” she said. In terms of vaccination, for instance, apart from the region of the Americas, which has almost reached 80% coverage, all other WHO regions remain far behind the 90% goal for 2030. “So, the work that we have to do to reach 90% is enormous,” said Broutet. Better adapted vaccines – the missing HPV 35 genotype Nathalie Broutet, University of Sydney aand former WHO cervical cancer specialist. However, along with more uptake of HPV vaccination, HPV vaccines need to be better adapted to the needs of girls and women in low- and middle–income populations. And recent research undertaken by CeHDI together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is pointing to a big gap in Africa. That is the lack of vaccine coverage for the HPV 35 genotype, which now a common subtype of the virus in Africa, in comparison to the rest of the world. “This is a genotype which is very common in African countries, which is responsible for around even more than 4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa,” said Broutet. “Yet this genotype is not included in the current HPV vaccine.” One brand-new study points to an even higher incidence, said Haileyesus Getahun, CEO of CeHDI, citing a new review of the “Burden of HPV 35 in African Cervical Pathologies” in the journal Medical Virology. That peer-reviewed study published this month, cites HPV35 prevalence of 19-30% in Mozambique, 22-26% in Kenya, 17% in South Africa and 11% in Zimbabwe and Tanzania among women with ICC lesions. In women with pre-cancerous lesions, rates of 20-26% were found in Botswana and Tanzania. In sharp contrast, studies from China, Canada, Sweden and Europe pointed to a prevalence of less than 1%. Globally, the prevalence among women with ICC lesions was only 2%. “Specifically, HPV35 has been more frequently associated with precancerous cervical lesions and accounts for a significant proportion of ICC [invasive cervical carcinoma] (4%–10%) in these populations, with a higher fraction than that observed in other regions,” concludes the authors from the University of Cape Town, South Africa; as well as medical research faculties in Tanzania, Botswana and Zimbabwe. HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer. Overcoming the key problems in service delivery For cervical cancer, school-based HPV vaccination delivery is critical. There are cited three key problems in service delivery, vaccination gaps, lack of access to low-cost HPV testing and related laboratory services; and lack of access to cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, which are out of reach in most rural clinics and in the public health systems of many urban centres. To overcome the challenges, global experts recommend the following: School-based vaccination – This is the first time a vaccine must be delivered to an adolescent population, leading to challenges with both disinformation as well as the need to put new systems in place. “We know in countries that use school- based delivery has been quite a success,” said Broutet. “Gender-neutral vaccination can improve the coverage and lift barriers that we see regarding the HPV vaccination of girls-only; and strong community engagement – communication needs to be in place. In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Shift from Pap smears to HPV testing – In high income countries with high rates of cervical cancer screening, the most used test remains the Pap smear – a cytology-based test. In low income countries BIA or bioimpedance screening, which uses electrical signals to detect abnormal cells, has been widely used as well due to its low–cost and rapid results. But WHO as well as many national health systems are now recommending a shift to HPV testing, widely regarded as more accurate and ultimately more cost-efficient. That involves testing specifically for the human papillomavirus genotypes that are the most common cause of cancer. “Even in countries that we think reach 70% coverage, there is a lot of work to be done to switch out the existing technology, which is basically cytology, and in low-income countries, BIA. Instead, all countries need to switch toward HPV testing,” says Broutet. “And we need also to ensure that innovation is available, and one of them is self-sampling, so self-collection and also urine samples. We need to ensure that all countries have access to this technology.” Self-screening and community-based treatment – Treatment immediately following screening is the third basic tool needed to reach elimination targets. Such treatment can remove pre-cancerous cells before they develop further. “Mobile screening clinics can be an option to increase coverage, task shifting to community health workers,” said Broutet. “This expands coverage. And finally, digital registry [of screening results]. We need to follow up and track women who have been screened to ensure those with a positive test have been treated.” Improving vaccine composition HPV 35 is one of five highly invasive genotypes not now covered by vaccines, responsible for an outsized proportion of cancers in Africa. Improving vaccine composition is also a critical mission, said Getahun. Together with IARC, CeHDI is supporting an even more thorough African and global review of the evidence on the HPV 35 genotype and its burden. “Our collaboration with IARC will help generate the evidence needed to inform the development of next-generation HPV vaccines that better reflect regional disease patterns, including the burden of HPV 35 in sub-Saharan Africa,” he observed. “Going forward we hope this will stimulate dialogue with the manufacturers, countries, WHO and global procurement partners such as Gavi and Unitaid to ensure that this genotype is included in the next generation of vaccines, particularly those deployed in Africa.” Currently, none of the main HPV vaccine manufacturers, which include the UK- and USA-based GSK and MSD(Merck), as well as the Serum Institute of India and two Chinese firms include HPV 35 in their vaccine formulations. However, a 14-valent vaccine by another leading Chinese pharma innovator, Sinocelltech, has a 14-valent vaccine SCT1000 in Phase 3 trials with some 18,000 women, which includes the HPV 35 genotype. “Especially in regions with high HIV prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the application of polyvalent HPV vaccines (including HPV 35) is essential, as people living with HIV are more prone to multiple HPV infections requiring broader protection,” state an October 2025 review by Chiara Paternostro and Elmar Joura, of the Medical University of Vienna. Gavi board: approved inclusion of improved vaccines once available HPV vaccine – Gavi has approved inclusion of improved formulations to protect against more genotypes once available. Asked by Health Policy Watch about the need and potential to update existing vaccines to include the HPV 35 genotype, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, said its board had in 2025 approved the inclusion of improved vaccines covering more virus genotypes in its portfolio as soon as they become available: “Current HPV vaccines are designed to protect against the large majority (70%) of cervical cancers. The importance of this evolving research is that we now have a better understanding of the disease burden of HPV-35 in countries across Africa, which Gavi supports – as well as how that burden is expected to increase over time as other types decrease due to improved vaccine coverage,” a Gavi spokesperson said. “While there are currently no licensed vaccines that provide protection against HPV‑35, the Gavi Board in December 2025 approved, based on WHO and SAGE guidance, an expansion of Gavi’s portfolio so that higher-valent vaccines can be made available to countries as and when they come available. We encourage our manufacturing partners to work with us in helping bring this about.” WHO pointed to a recent systematic review by WHO/IARC (Wei et al. 2024) confirming that HPV35 is part of the remaining known 10 HPV causal genotypes, it causes only about 5% of cases worldwide, “but with some notable regional variations, including a higher proportion (~4%) for HPV 35 in Africa than in other regions.” “Currently, HPV35 is not among the types covered in the two existing, licensed (highest valency) HPV9 vaccines that contain the same 7 oncogenic types (16,18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58),” a spokesperson said. “We are aware additional work is being done on HPV35 that may provide more information on this strain and its contribution to cervical cancer burden– in particular, in the African region. In future that may inform vaccine developers in their choice for additional HPV type to be included in ‘even higher valency’.” Rwanda: on track to beat 2050 global elimination target Two girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka, Rwanda, a country that is on track to reach the 2050 goal for cervical cancer elimination. But vaccination is not in itself an answer. It must be part of a multi-pronged approach. “Over the next 50 years, scaling up screening and treatment could avert up to 14.6 million deaths, three times more than vaccination alone,” noted Cabo Verde’s UN Ambassador in Geneva Clara Delgado and a member of the Unitaid Executive Board. Since 2019, Unitaid has introduced HPV testing, self-sampling methods and portable thermal ablation treatment devices (for removal of precancerous lesions) across approximately 50 low- and middle income countries, driving down costs significantly.” Bulk procurement has reduced HPV test prices by 40% and the costs of thermal ablation by 45% “making these lifesaving tools affordable where they are needed most.” But just as important are country models that work, she stressed, citing Rwanda, South Africa, Malawi and the Philippines as “champion” examples. “For example, in Rwanda with Unitaid’s partnership since 2019, a national screen and treat program now operates in over half of the country. Women in rural communities are being reached through HPV self-collection kits, a simple, dignified approach that brings services closer to home, breaking barriers of distance, stigma and cost. As a result of the partnership, Rwanda is on track to beat the 2030 elimination targets by three years, “proving that elimination is not just possible, but achievable.” Repeating the success of smallpox eradication “Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer by 2050,” said Ramsammy, “Today we have an opportunity to elevate cervical cancer elimination on the multilateral agenda as a matter of equity, gender justice and the right to health.” Said Getahun, “At a time when global solidarity and multilateralism are under strain, health diplomacy is more important than ever in strengthening North–South and South–South cooperation and advancing the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer.” Adds Broutet, “We have a generation to end cervical cancer, and we have the tools,” citing national elimination targets; sustainable financing; regional cooperation to decrease the price of the tools and investing in treatment infrastructure as key political levers. “The science exists, the roadmap exists, but the inequity persists. Political will determines the outcome.” Most important is the need to address gender inequities. “Each country of the world needs to understand, what are these drivers of inequity in their own country?” she said, citing the late WHO director Mahmoud Fathalla, who once said: “women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. They are dying because societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.” Image Credits: UNICEF, WHO , N. Broutet/WHO, ecancer.org, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, Broutet, Gavi, HPV World . US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
New Open Source AI Platform Aims to Accelerate Malaria Drug Discovery 31/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan A health worker examines a child with suspected malaria. Scientists working on new malaria drugs now have access to an open-access artificial intelligence (AI)-powered platform aimed at accelerating drug discovery, thanks to a partnership between Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) and deepmirror. Drug Design for Global Health (dd4gh) uses “both predictive and generative AI to give researchers, especially those in the most resource-limited settings, access to cutting-edge technology that would otherwise be out of reach”, according to a media release from MMV. The dd4gh platform was developed using input gathered during co‑creation workshops in Ghana and Switzerland with global drug discovery researchers. Its AI models are trained on data sets from a wide range of studies conducted by global health researchers, enabling scientists to benefit from insights generated across multiple research efforts. “At a time when the global health sector is facing significant constraints, dd4gh demonstrates the power of partnership,” said MMV CEO Dr Martin Fitchet. “By giving scientists in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) free access to advanced AI tools, we can accelerate the discovery of lifesaving medicines led by the people closest to the diseases we are trying to defeat.” The platform implements active learning, a technique that allows AI and machine learning (ML) to continuously improve its predictions by learning from new data. It analyses large data sets and proposes the most promising compounds to explore in the lab. Shorter timelines, reduced costs These technologies have the potential to dramatically shorten timelines and reduce costs for drug discovery, allowing scientists to focus their time and resources on what is more likely to work, enabling faster discovery of treatments for diseases that pose significant global health challenges. “Africa is disproportionately affected by many infectious and non-infectious diseases, yet African-led solutions are limited. Tools like dd4gh can have a transformative impact on the continent’s capacity for drug discovery research,” said Prof Richard Amewu, lead of the drug innovation group at the University of Ghana, which tested the platform. Dr Godwin Dziwornu, senior investigator in medicinal chemistry at the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) H3D, said that the platform is “easy to access and user-friendly”. Dziwornu added: “I’ve found it very useful in two main areas: generating new compound designs and the models available to assess compound properties and predict their drug likeness to solve a particular liability, for example, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. This helps me guide my decisions to synthesise high-quality compounds, saving me precious time and resources.” Caroline Maina, a UCT PhD candidate and participant in a co-creation workshop, said there are other AI tools that can help with drug discovery “but being in a resource-limited setting makes purchasing a license prohibitive”. “Making dd4gh open access for researchers in global health means more of us can explore new ideas and apply AI to finding treatments for diseases that are part of our everyday realities,” said Maina. Dr Max Jakobs, co-founder and CEO of deepmirror, said the free platform aims to strengthen “a more inclusive global scientific ecosystem” as “access to advanced AI should not depend on where a scientist works or their laboratory’s resources”. deepmirror builds chemistry-based foundation models for biopharma and research organisations to support active drug discovery programmes. It integrates predictive and generative AI directly into research workflows, combining “proprietary data with models trained on larger, curated datasets, which are continuously updated and strengthened over time”. MMV is a not-for-profit product development partnership working to discover, develop and deliver medicines to treat, prevent and eliminate malaria. Since 1999, its co-developed medicines have helped 1.3 billion people. Image Credits: Tommy Trenchard/ Global Fund, Damien Schumann / MMV. More Countries Refer to Refugees in Health Policies, but Access and Data Gaps Persist 30/03/2026 Stefan Anderson First global survey of 93 nations shows two-thirds include these populations in health plans, but none provide equal access to undocumented migrants. More than 60 countries now include refugees and migrants in their national health policies, according to a new World Health Organization (WHO) report tracking progress on commitments first set out by the World Health Assembly in 2019. The finding, drawn from a survey of 93 member states, is the first systematic count of how countries are implementing a resolution that called on governments to ensure refugees and migrants have access to health services, are included in national health planning, and are counted in health data systems. “Many countries have begun integrating refugee and migrant health into national strategies,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “Yet gaps remain, particularly in collecting and using migration-related health data, ensuring participation of refugees and migrants in decision-making, and guaranteeing access to care for all, regardless of legal status.” “Like anyone else, refugees and migrants need uninterrupted, affordable and equitable access to health services wherever they are,” Tedros said. While WHO called the findings “encouraging,” the picture the report paints is difficult to read clearly. What “inclusion in a national health policy” actually means for care access for migrants and refugees varies widely – and the report does not name which countries fall where. Two-thirds of the 93 surveyed countries said they include refugees and migrants in their health policies. When asked what level of access different groups receive, 16 countries said refugees can access services on a par with the host population, 14 extended that standard to documented migrant workers, and 11 to asylum seekers. No country surveyed reported providing equal access to migrants in irregular situations – those living without legal status or formal documentation. The positive examples the report does name – from Belgium to Chile – are presented as case studies. Only 37% of countries routinely collect and disseminate migration-related health data. Fewer than 40% train health workers in culturally responsive care. Just 30% have run campaigns to counter misinformation or discrimination, the report found. The report is the first systematic quantification of these indicators, further blurring the picture of progress, as there is no baseline to compare against. The data is also entirely drawn from a voluntary survey completed by member states with no independent verification, meaning the results are unvetted self-assessments. The report explicitly does not rank countries on the success, impact or implementation of their policies, and “did not assess the level of implementation or impact of any given initiative,” meaning real-world outcomes “cannot be evaluated,” it said. The survey also contains no questions about financing, meaning a country can report including refugees in its national health policy while allocating no dedicated budget to deliver on it. “Rather than ranking countries on their progress,” the report notes, it seeks to identify how key gaps can be addressed going forward. The report comes as conflict, climate change and economic insecurity displace more people than ever before. More than one billion people live as refugees or migrants worldwide, though over 800 million remain within their own borders. There are 405 million international migrants, 36.8 million refugees, 8.4 million asylum seekers and 83.4 million internally displaced people. Dr Santino Severoni, head of WHO’s Special Initiative on Health and Migration and lead author of the report, said it was intended as a roadmap for coordinated action across governments, UN agencies, civil society, academia and migrant communities themselves. “The health of refugees and migrants is not a marginal concern: it is a defining issue of our time,” Severoni said. “By acting now, countries can ensure that refugees and migrants are not left behind, and that health systems are stronger, fairer and more prepared for the future.” Data ’emergency’, exclusion from emergency plans Progress roadmap for the World Health Assembly Resolution on migrant and refugee health. The new report follows a first edition published in 2022, which was a literature review of around 82,000 documents that established the scale of health disparities facing refugees and migrants worldwide. Two further progress checks are planned for 2027 and 2029, ahead of the 2030 deadline set by WHA member states for full implementation. The 2022 report identified fragmented data collection as the central structural obstacle to effective policy. That remains unresolved. Severoni described the situation as “almost an emergency.” “It’s not because data is not collected, but because they are collected in a very fragmented way, which makes it very, very difficult for us to have a full picture,” he said. Just 42% of countries include refugees and migrants in emergency preparedness or disaster risk reduction plans. Irregular migrants – those without legal residency status – are entirely absent from those frameworks, even as the crises that drive displacement, from war to climate-related disasters, intensify. “We cannot talk about refugee and migrant health without also addressing emergencies,” said Dr Chikwe Ihekweazu, WHO’s executive director for health emergencies. “Whether it’s a conflict, a climate-related crisis or an epidemic that forces movement, these crises expose the fragility of health systems and magnify the vulnerabilities of all those already at risk.” Population groups among refugees and migrants included in national health policies,legislation, strategies or plans. “This is not only an equity issue — it is a global health security risk,” he added. Excluding displaced populations from health systems, he said, weakens the collective capacity to detect and respond to outbreaks and crises. “Health does not begin and end at borders.” WHO is calling on governments to strengthen disaggregated health data collection, tailor policies to specific migrant groups including those in irregular situations, involve refugees and migrants in health governance, train health workers in culturally responsive care, and protect and expand financing. “The phenomena of displacement is unfortunately happening more frequently in countries with fragile systems, fragile economies and limited domestic resources,” Severoni said. “There is almost no mention of irregular migrants in those emergency plans and response or in disease risk reductions, there is no systematic approach in assessing the system to see how their system is really functioning, how efficient and effective it is.” “This is really a call for action to keep the promise of sharing a bit of responsibility in managing those emergencies,” he added. Political wave washes away progress Political sentiment in many wealthy nations has turned against expanding access for migrants, refugees and asylees. The report highlights progress in some countries. Chile has embedded migrant community representatives in municipal health councils, with direct input into maternal and mental health priorities. Belgium has run a national intercultural mediation programme since 1999; as of late 2024, 113 trained mediators were working across 76 hospitals and community health centres. Yet the report’s release comes as several wealthy nations move to restrict refugee and migrant healthcare, driven by economic pressures and political campaigns questioning whether asylum seekers and refugees should be entitled to publicly funded care. In the United States, legislation passed in 2025 changed the definition of “eligible alien” for Medicaid eligibility, cutting coverage for many lawfully present immigrants, asylees, refugees, and trafficking and domestic violence survivors. On 1 May, its northern neighbour Canada will start requiring refugees and asylum seekers to pay out of pocket for essential health services previously covered under its Interim Federal Health Program. The programme “has provided basic health coverage to people fleeing war, genocide, torture, and persecution since 1957,” according to the Migrant Rights Network. Services affected include medications, dental care, mental health, vision and physiotherapy. Across the Atlantic, Germany extended to 36 months the period in which asylum seekers are restricted to emergency-only care, doubling the previous threshold of 18 months. In France, a similar fight is playing out over the future of its Aide Médicale de l’État programme, which provides medical care to undocumented migrants. Critics say the programme encourages migration and is an undue cost to taxpayers, though it accounts for just 0.5% of national public health spending. International funding for refugee health has also fallen sharply. UNHCR’s 2025 budget stands at $10.6 billion, of which only 23% had been secured at mid-year. The agency has warned that up to 12.8 million displaced people could be left without life-saving health interventions this year. “Around the world, more than one billion people are on the move, seeking safety, opportunity and dignity,” Tedros said. “Investing in refugee and migrant health is both ethically essential and strategically beneficial. Supporting their health and inclusion strengthens health systems and benefits everyone.” Image Credits: Wikipedia Commons. Pandemic Agreement Talks Get Five More Negotiating Days 30/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, addressing IGWG6 on Saturday evening. With no agreement in sight, World Health Organization (WHO) member states curtailed talks on the Pandemic Agreement annex five hours earlier than scheduled on Saturday night, resolving to meet again within a month for a further five days of negotiations. Member states will reconvene between 27 April and 1 May to negotiate further on the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) annex, with the hope of tabling the annex at the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May. The PABS annex is intended to ensure, on equal footing, the rapid sharing of pathogens with pandemic potential and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their use, including vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics. Addressing the tired delegates of the Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) after six days of intense talks, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that their efforts had not been wasted. “At the same time, we must be candid,” said Tedros. “Despite best efforts, differences remain on key issues. These are not trivial matters. They go to the heart of equity, access, sovereignty and global solidarity. It’s therefore understandable that more time is needed to bridge these gaps in a meaningful and durable way.” Tedros expressed support for IGWG’s decision to resume negotiations in about four weeks. “This pause is not a setback. It’s an opportunity. It allows us to reflect, to consult further with our capitals, and to return with renewed clarity and flexibility, not to keep negotiating indefinitely, but to continue and to close the deal.” However, tension was palpable at the start of the sixth – and supposedly final – round of talks last Monday when the African region rejected the Bureau’s draft of the PABS Annex. Leading Africa’s position, South Africa and Namibia proposed that the draft text circulated by the IGWG Bureau on 9 March should be disregarded in favour of the on-screen text considered at the end of the fifth IGWG meeting on 14 February. African regional ambassadors had resolved to stick to this text as they had not had time to consult their capitals on the new draft, Namibia reported. After some tension during the closed session, member states accepted this position. The message from one African country after another was that they would not allow a repeat of the inequity seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, and would not compromise on certain key issues. These include that the countries sharing pathogens need guaranteed benefits, and that the PABS annex needs “legal certainty”, including contracts for commercial users of pathogen information. Burkina Faso, speaking for the WHO Africa and Egypt, Sudan, Libya and Somalia, noted that registration should be mandatory for all users of the PABS system, benefit-sharing obligations should be clearer, and there should be more capcity-building –including technology transfer – for developing countries. New Funding Models Needed as Global Health Faces Growing Financial Strain 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Christoph Benn (left) and Patrick Silborn Global health is facing a funding crisis. Aid is shrinking, debt is rising, and the needs are only increasing. According to Christoph Benn of the Joep Lange Institute and Patrik Silborn of UNICEF Afghanistan, health systems will need to fundamentally rethink how they finance and sustain care. On a recent episode of the Global Health Matters podcast, host Gary Aslanyan was joined by these two experts, who said “innovative finance” has become central to discussions on sustaining health systems. Benn said that while the term is widely used, few agree on what it actually means. He described it as a “spectrum” of approaches, ranging from philanthropic grants and conditional funding to private-sector investment models that expect financial returns. “It has frustrated us deeply that so many people are talking about innovative finance, but very few actually know what they’re talking about,” Benn said. Silborn emphasised that these mechanisms should not be treated as one-size-fits-all solutions. Instead, financing models must be designed around specific problems whether that means raising new funds, improving efficiency, or linking payments to measurable outcomes. Drawing on his experience in Rwanda, Silborn described how a results-based funding model tied disbursements directly to performance, helping the country to maintain progress against major diseases despite reduced funding. Both experts stressed that private-sector engagement requires a clear understanding of incentives. “Private corporations are not charities,” Benn said. They can, however, contribute through marketing partnerships, technical expertise, or investment models that align financial returns with social outcomes. Looking ahead, Benn pointed to targeted taxes and debt swaps as among the most scalable tools. Still, both warned that innovative finance is not a substitute for public responsibility. “It only works when it is designed to solve real problems in specific contexts,” Benn said, underscoring that strong systems and governance remain essential to any lasting solution. Listen to the full episode >> Read more about Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Global Health Needs Rethink as Systems Fall Behind 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Dr Garry Aslanyan and Axel R. Pries Global health leaders say the world needs to rethink how it approaches health, arguing that outdated systems, narrow thinking, and lack of coordination are slowing progress at a time of growing challenges. Speaking on the Global Health Matters podcast, Axel Pries, president of the World Health Summit, told host Dr Gary Aslanyan that improving health outcomes will require broader cooperation across sectors, stronger communication, and a shift toward prevention. Listen to the full episode >> Pries said it was “clear that we needed politics, civil society and also the private sector.” He argued that global health can no longer be driven by governments and medical professionals alone, and that progress depends on open collaboration between actors with different interests. While concerns remain, especially around the private sector, he said these partnerships are key to turning research into real-world results. He also pointed to shifting global power, saying institutions created after World War II need to adapt to a more multipolar world. Countries like India, Brazil, and those across Africa should have a bigger role in shaping global health. At the same time, he said core values, especially a shared commitment to health equity, must stay the same. Pries also highlighted challenges in how global health is communicated. Too often, the term is misunderstood as a niche issue affecting distant regions, rather than something that directly impacts everyday life. “It’s everything, everywhere. It’s at our doorstep,” Pries said. Looking ahead, he called for greater engagement from finance and political leaders, and a stronger focus on prevention rather than crisis response.Without that shift, he warned, health systems will remain reactive rather than resilient. Listen to more Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Available Cervical Cancer Vaccines Fail to Cover the HPV 35 Genotype Common in Africa 26/03/2026 Elaine Ruth Fletcher “Cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity:” Ambassador Leslie Ramsammy, Guyana (center). Left, UN Ambassadors Clara Delgado and Antje Leenderste of Capo Verde and Germany. Right, CeHDI CEO Haileyesus Getahun and Colin Murdoch, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean Statees (OECS). The Human papillomavirus (HPV35), globally associated with only 2% of invasive cervical cancers (ICC), has a disproportionately higher prevalence in sub‐Saharan Africa, reaching rates of 22-30% in some countries among women with ICC lesions, according to a new study. Recently, a high-level panel called for redoubled efforts in HPV vaccination, screening and treatment to meet the WHO Global Strategy targets for 2030 – and eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 worldwide. Midway along the route toward the WHO 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination, some 340,000 women a year, mostly in low-income countries, are still dying from cervical cancer – due to the dearth of simple solutions like screening, treatment off pre-cancerous cells, and low HPV vaccination coverage for adolescent girls. Meanwhile, HPV 35—a genotype of the HPV virus that is steadily spreading throughout Africa—is not targeted by existing vaccine formulations. This highlights the urgent need to speed up research and development to create an updated vaccine. At the same time, success stories from a handful of developing countries such as Rwanda demonstrate that the 2030 targets for 90% HPV vaccine coverage, 70% screening and 90% treatment can be attained – when political will exists. Meeting those targets would put countries on track to meeting the global elimination goal of less than 4 cervical cancer cases annually per 100 000 women as early as 2050. Those were key messages emerging from a recent high-level seminar on a Cervical Cancer-Free Future, convened by the Center for Global Health Development and Inclusion (CeHDI) together with the UN in Geneva ambassadors of Barbados, Germany, Guyana and Malawi. “Although cervical cancer is both preventable and curable when detected early, it remains the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death among women worldwide,” said Guyana’s ambassador, Leslie Ramsammy. “In Guyana, for example, it is the number two cause of cancer deaths among women. For some countries, it’s the number one cause of cancer death among women each year.” About 600,000 women annually are diagnosed with cervical cancer, representing 6.5% of new cancer cases and 7.7% of cancer deaths. And 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. As such, “cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity,” he added. The goal: global elimination of cervical cancer by 2050 Countries must reach the WHO 2030 targets for diagnosis and treatment in order to reach the goal of cervical cancer elimination by 2050. Most developed countries are on a trajectory to meet the WHO 2030 goals and moving on from there, to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health risk by 2050. However, developing countries are on a much longer trajectory. And at current rates of progress, most will only reach elimination in 2120, said Ramsammy. “Today’s High-Level dialog is a call to change the trajectory for elimination from 2120 to earlier… closer to 2050 when many European countries and North America would have achieved elimination.” Said Ramsammy, “The question is no longer whether cervical cancer can be eliminated, but when and whether the world will mobilize the political will and resources needed to ensure that no woman dies from a preventable disease. Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer.” Incidence rates in African countries 10–20 times higher than 2030 goal Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are heavily concentrated in low-and middle-incomee countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most developed countries already have a cervical cancer incidence of between 10-4 cases annually per 100 000 women – with 4/100 000 being the elimination threshold. But many countries in Africa have cervical cancer incidence of 60-70 or even eighty cases annually per 100 000 women, said Nathalie Broutet, of the University of Sydney, Australia, citing Malawi and Eswatini as examples. As a former WHO staff member, Broutet helped draft the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2020. To get on course for elimination “we need to reach the 2030 targets, which are 90% HPV vaccination coverage; 70% of women screened with a high performance, twice in a lifetime; and 90% of women detected with a cervical disease treated,” she said. In terms of vaccination, for instance, apart from the region of the Americas, which has almost reached 80% coverage, all other WHO regions remain far behind the 90% goal for 2030. “So, the work that we have to do to reach 90% is enormous,” said Broutet. Better adapted vaccines – the missing HPV 35 genotype Nathalie Broutet, University of Sydney aand former WHO cervical cancer specialist. However, along with more uptake of HPV vaccination, HPV vaccines need to be better adapted to the needs of girls and women in low- and middle–income populations. And recent research undertaken by CeHDI together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is pointing to a big gap in Africa. That is the lack of vaccine coverage for the HPV 35 genotype, which now a common subtype of the virus in Africa, in comparison to the rest of the world. “This is a genotype which is very common in African countries, which is responsible for around even more than 4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa,” said Broutet. “Yet this genotype is not included in the current HPV vaccine.” One brand-new study points to an even higher incidence, said Haileyesus Getahun, CEO of CeHDI, citing a new review of the “Burden of HPV 35 in African Cervical Pathologies” in the journal Medical Virology. That peer-reviewed study published this month, cites HPV35 prevalence of 19-30% in Mozambique, 22-26% in Kenya, 17% in South Africa and 11% in Zimbabwe and Tanzania among women with ICC lesions. In women with pre-cancerous lesions, rates of 20-26% were found in Botswana and Tanzania. In sharp contrast, studies from China, Canada, Sweden and Europe pointed to a prevalence of less than 1%. Globally, the prevalence among women with ICC lesions was only 2%. “Specifically, HPV35 has been more frequently associated with precancerous cervical lesions and accounts for a significant proportion of ICC [invasive cervical carcinoma] (4%–10%) in these populations, with a higher fraction than that observed in other regions,” concludes the authors from the University of Cape Town, South Africa; as well as medical research faculties in Tanzania, Botswana and Zimbabwe. HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer. Overcoming the key problems in service delivery For cervical cancer, school-based HPV vaccination delivery is critical. There are cited three key problems in service delivery, vaccination gaps, lack of access to low-cost HPV testing and related laboratory services; and lack of access to cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, which are out of reach in most rural clinics and in the public health systems of many urban centres. To overcome the challenges, global experts recommend the following: School-based vaccination – This is the first time a vaccine must be delivered to an adolescent population, leading to challenges with both disinformation as well as the need to put new systems in place. “We know in countries that use school- based delivery has been quite a success,” said Broutet. “Gender-neutral vaccination can improve the coverage and lift barriers that we see regarding the HPV vaccination of girls-only; and strong community engagement – communication needs to be in place. In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Shift from Pap smears to HPV testing – In high income countries with high rates of cervical cancer screening, the most used test remains the Pap smear – a cytology-based test. In low income countries BIA or bioimpedance screening, which uses electrical signals to detect abnormal cells, has been widely used as well due to its low–cost and rapid results. But WHO as well as many national health systems are now recommending a shift to HPV testing, widely regarded as more accurate and ultimately more cost-efficient. That involves testing specifically for the human papillomavirus genotypes that are the most common cause of cancer. “Even in countries that we think reach 70% coverage, there is a lot of work to be done to switch out the existing technology, which is basically cytology, and in low-income countries, BIA. Instead, all countries need to switch toward HPV testing,” says Broutet. “And we need also to ensure that innovation is available, and one of them is self-sampling, so self-collection and also urine samples. We need to ensure that all countries have access to this technology.” Self-screening and community-based treatment – Treatment immediately following screening is the third basic tool needed to reach elimination targets. Such treatment can remove pre-cancerous cells before they develop further. “Mobile screening clinics can be an option to increase coverage, task shifting to community health workers,” said Broutet. “This expands coverage. And finally, digital registry [of screening results]. We need to follow up and track women who have been screened to ensure those with a positive test have been treated.” Improving vaccine composition HPV 35 is one of five highly invasive genotypes not now covered by vaccines, responsible for an outsized proportion of cancers in Africa. Improving vaccine composition is also a critical mission, said Getahun. Together with IARC, CeHDI is supporting an even more thorough African and global review of the evidence on the HPV 35 genotype and its burden. “Our collaboration with IARC will help generate the evidence needed to inform the development of next-generation HPV vaccines that better reflect regional disease patterns, including the burden of HPV 35 in sub-Saharan Africa,” he observed. “Going forward we hope this will stimulate dialogue with the manufacturers, countries, WHO and global procurement partners such as Gavi and Unitaid to ensure that this genotype is included in the next generation of vaccines, particularly those deployed in Africa.” Currently, none of the main HPV vaccine manufacturers, which include the UK- and USA-based GSK and MSD(Merck), as well as the Serum Institute of India and two Chinese firms include HPV 35 in their vaccine formulations. However, a 14-valent vaccine by another leading Chinese pharma innovator, Sinocelltech, has a 14-valent vaccine SCT1000 in Phase 3 trials with some 18,000 women, which includes the HPV 35 genotype. “Especially in regions with high HIV prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the application of polyvalent HPV vaccines (including HPV 35) is essential, as people living with HIV are more prone to multiple HPV infections requiring broader protection,” state an October 2025 review by Chiara Paternostro and Elmar Joura, of the Medical University of Vienna. Gavi board: approved inclusion of improved vaccines once available HPV vaccine – Gavi has approved inclusion of improved formulations to protect against more genotypes once available. Asked by Health Policy Watch about the need and potential to update existing vaccines to include the HPV 35 genotype, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, said its board had in 2025 approved the inclusion of improved vaccines covering more virus genotypes in its portfolio as soon as they become available: “Current HPV vaccines are designed to protect against the large majority (70%) of cervical cancers. The importance of this evolving research is that we now have a better understanding of the disease burden of HPV-35 in countries across Africa, which Gavi supports – as well as how that burden is expected to increase over time as other types decrease due to improved vaccine coverage,” a Gavi spokesperson said. “While there are currently no licensed vaccines that provide protection against HPV‑35, the Gavi Board in December 2025 approved, based on WHO and SAGE guidance, an expansion of Gavi’s portfolio so that higher-valent vaccines can be made available to countries as and when they come available. We encourage our manufacturing partners to work with us in helping bring this about.” WHO pointed to a recent systematic review by WHO/IARC (Wei et al. 2024) confirming that HPV35 is part of the remaining known 10 HPV causal genotypes, it causes only about 5% of cases worldwide, “but with some notable regional variations, including a higher proportion (~4%) for HPV 35 in Africa than in other regions.” “Currently, HPV35 is not among the types covered in the two existing, licensed (highest valency) HPV9 vaccines that contain the same 7 oncogenic types (16,18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58),” a spokesperson said. “We are aware additional work is being done on HPV35 that may provide more information on this strain and its contribution to cervical cancer burden– in particular, in the African region. In future that may inform vaccine developers in their choice for additional HPV type to be included in ‘even higher valency’.” Rwanda: on track to beat 2050 global elimination target Two girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka, Rwanda, a country that is on track to reach the 2050 goal for cervical cancer elimination. But vaccination is not in itself an answer. It must be part of a multi-pronged approach. “Over the next 50 years, scaling up screening and treatment could avert up to 14.6 million deaths, three times more than vaccination alone,” noted Cabo Verde’s UN Ambassador in Geneva Clara Delgado and a member of the Unitaid Executive Board. Since 2019, Unitaid has introduced HPV testing, self-sampling methods and portable thermal ablation treatment devices (for removal of precancerous lesions) across approximately 50 low- and middle income countries, driving down costs significantly.” Bulk procurement has reduced HPV test prices by 40% and the costs of thermal ablation by 45% “making these lifesaving tools affordable where they are needed most.” But just as important are country models that work, she stressed, citing Rwanda, South Africa, Malawi and the Philippines as “champion” examples. “For example, in Rwanda with Unitaid’s partnership since 2019, a national screen and treat program now operates in over half of the country. Women in rural communities are being reached through HPV self-collection kits, a simple, dignified approach that brings services closer to home, breaking barriers of distance, stigma and cost. As a result of the partnership, Rwanda is on track to beat the 2030 elimination targets by three years, “proving that elimination is not just possible, but achievable.” Repeating the success of smallpox eradication “Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer by 2050,” said Ramsammy, “Today we have an opportunity to elevate cervical cancer elimination on the multilateral agenda as a matter of equity, gender justice and the right to health.” Said Getahun, “At a time when global solidarity and multilateralism are under strain, health diplomacy is more important than ever in strengthening North–South and South–South cooperation and advancing the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer.” Adds Broutet, “We have a generation to end cervical cancer, and we have the tools,” citing national elimination targets; sustainable financing; regional cooperation to decrease the price of the tools and investing in treatment infrastructure as key political levers. “The science exists, the roadmap exists, but the inequity persists. Political will determines the outcome.” Most important is the need to address gender inequities. “Each country of the world needs to understand, what are these drivers of inequity in their own country?” she said, citing the late WHO director Mahmoud Fathalla, who once said: “women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. They are dying because societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.” Image Credits: UNICEF, WHO , N. Broutet/WHO, ecancer.org, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, Broutet, Gavi, HPV World . US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
More Countries Refer to Refugees in Health Policies, but Access and Data Gaps Persist 30/03/2026 Stefan Anderson First global survey of 93 nations shows two-thirds include these populations in health plans, but none provide equal access to undocumented migrants. More than 60 countries now include refugees and migrants in their national health policies, according to a new World Health Organization (WHO) report tracking progress on commitments first set out by the World Health Assembly in 2019. The finding, drawn from a survey of 93 member states, is the first systematic count of how countries are implementing a resolution that called on governments to ensure refugees and migrants have access to health services, are included in national health planning, and are counted in health data systems. “Many countries have begun integrating refugee and migrant health into national strategies,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “Yet gaps remain, particularly in collecting and using migration-related health data, ensuring participation of refugees and migrants in decision-making, and guaranteeing access to care for all, regardless of legal status.” “Like anyone else, refugees and migrants need uninterrupted, affordable and equitable access to health services wherever they are,” Tedros said. While WHO called the findings “encouraging,” the picture the report paints is difficult to read clearly. What “inclusion in a national health policy” actually means for care access for migrants and refugees varies widely – and the report does not name which countries fall where. Two-thirds of the 93 surveyed countries said they include refugees and migrants in their health policies. When asked what level of access different groups receive, 16 countries said refugees can access services on a par with the host population, 14 extended that standard to documented migrant workers, and 11 to asylum seekers. No country surveyed reported providing equal access to migrants in irregular situations – those living without legal status or formal documentation. The positive examples the report does name – from Belgium to Chile – are presented as case studies. Only 37% of countries routinely collect and disseminate migration-related health data. Fewer than 40% train health workers in culturally responsive care. Just 30% have run campaigns to counter misinformation or discrimination, the report found. The report is the first systematic quantification of these indicators, further blurring the picture of progress, as there is no baseline to compare against. The data is also entirely drawn from a voluntary survey completed by member states with no independent verification, meaning the results are unvetted self-assessments. The report explicitly does not rank countries on the success, impact or implementation of their policies, and “did not assess the level of implementation or impact of any given initiative,” meaning real-world outcomes “cannot be evaluated,” it said. The survey also contains no questions about financing, meaning a country can report including refugees in its national health policy while allocating no dedicated budget to deliver on it. “Rather than ranking countries on their progress,” the report notes, it seeks to identify how key gaps can be addressed going forward. The report comes as conflict, climate change and economic insecurity displace more people than ever before. More than one billion people live as refugees or migrants worldwide, though over 800 million remain within their own borders. There are 405 million international migrants, 36.8 million refugees, 8.4 million asylum seekers and 83.4 million internally displaced people. Dr Santino Severoni, head of WHO’s Special Initiative on Health and Migration and lead author of the report, said it was intended as a roadmap for coordinated action across governments, UN agencies, civil society, academia and migrant communities themselves. “The health of refugees and migrants is not a marginal concern: it is a defining issue of our time,” Severoni said. “By acting now, countries can ensure that refugees and migrants are not left behind, and that health systems are stronger, fairer and more prepared for the future.” Data ’emergency’, exclusion from emergency plans Progress roadmap for the World Health Assembly Resolution on migrant and refugee health. The new report follows a first edition published in 2022, which was a literature review of around 82,000 documents that established the scale of health disparities facing refugees and migrants worldwide. Two further progress checks are planned for 2027 and 2029, ahead of the 2030 deadline set by WHA member states for full implementation. The 2022 report identified fragmented data collection as the central structural obstacle to effective policy. That remains unresolved. Severoni described the situation as “almost an emergency.” “It’s not because data is not collected, but because they are collected in a very fragmented way, which makes it very, very difficult for us to have a full picture,” he said. Just 42% of countries include refugees and migrants in emergency preparedness or disaster risk reduction plans. Irregular migrants – those without legal residency status – are entirely absent from those frameworks, even as the crises that drive displacement, from war to climate-related disasters, intensify. “We cannot talk about refugee and migrant health without also addressing emergencies,” said Dr Chikwe Ihekweazu, WHO’s executive director for health emergencies. “Whether it’s a conflict, a climate-related crisis or an epidemic that forces movement, these crises expose the fragility of health systems and magnify the vulnerabilities of all those already at risk.” Population groups among refugees and migrants included in national health policies,legislation, strategies or plans. “This is not only an equity issue — it is a global health security risk,” he added. Excluding displaced populations from health systems, he said, weakens the collective capacity to detect and respond to outbreaks and crises. “Health does not begin and end at borders.” WHO is calling on governments to strengthen disaggregated health data collection, tailor policies to specific migrant groups including those in irregular situations, involve refugees and migrants in health governance, train health workers in culturally responsive care, and protect and expand financing. “The phenomena of displacement is unfortunately happening more frequently in countries with fragile systems, fragile economies and limited domestic resources,” Severoni said. “There is almost no mention of irregular migrants in those emergency plans and response or in disease risk reductions, there is no systematic approach in assessing the system to see how their system is really functioning, how efficient and effective it is.” “This is really a call for action to keep the promise of sharing a bit of responsibility in managing those emergencies,” he added. Political wave washes away progress Political sentiment in many wealthy nations has turned against expanding access for migrants, refugees and asylees. The report highlights progress in some countries. Chile has embedded migrant community representatives in municipal health councils, with direct input into maternal and mental health priorities. Belgium has run a national intercultural mediation programme since 1999; as of late 2024, 113 trained mediators were working across 76 hospitals and community health centres. Yet the report’s release comes as several wealthy nations move to restrict refugee and migrant healthcare, driven by economic pressures and political campaigns questioning whether asylum seekers and refugees should be entitled to publicly funded care. In the United States, legislation passed in 2025 changed the definition of “eligible alien” for Medicaid eligibility, cutting coverage for many lawfully present immigrants, asylees, refugees, and trafficking and domestic violence survivors. On 1 May, its northern neighbour Canada will start requiring refugees and asylum seekers to pay out of pocket for essential health services previously covered under its Interim Federal Health Program. The programme “has provided basic health coverage to people fleeing war, genocide, torture, and persecution since 1957,” according to the Migrant Rights Network. Services affected include medications, dental care, mental health, vision and physiotherapy. Across the Atlantic, Germany extended to 36 months the period in which asylum seekers are restricted to emergency-only care, doubling the previous threshold of 18 months. In France, a similar fight is playing out over the future of its Aide Médicale de l’État programme, which provides medical care to undocumented migrants. Critics say the programme encourages migration and is an undue cost to taxpayers, though it accounts for just 0.5% of national public health spending. International funding for refugee health has also fallen sharply. UNHCR’s 2025 budget stands at $10.6 billion, of which only 23% had been secured at mid-year. The agency has warned that up to 12.8 million displaced people could be left without life-saving health interventions this year. “Around the world, more than one billion people are on the move, seeking safety, opportunity and dignity,” Tedros said. “Investing in refugee and migrant health is both ethically essential and strategically beneficial. Supporting their health and inclusion strengthens health systems and benefits everyone.” Image Credits: Wikipedia Commons. Pandemic Agreement Talks Get Five More Negotiating Days 30/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, addressing IGWG6 on Saturday evening. With no agreement in sight, World Health Organization (WHO) member states curtailed talks on the Pandemic Agreement annex five hours earlier than scheduled on Saturday night, resolving to meet again within a month for a further five days of negotiations. Member states will reconvene between 27 April and 1 May to negotiate further on the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) annex, with the hope of tabling the annex at the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May. The PABS annex is intended to ensure, on equal footing, the rapid sharing of pathogens with pandemic potential and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their use, including vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics. Addressing the tired delegates of the Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) after six days of intense talks, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that their efforts had not been wasted. “At the same time, we must be candid,” said Tedros. “Despite best efforts, differences remain on key issues. These are not trivial matters. They go to the heart of equity, access, sovereignty and global solidarity. It’s therefore understandable that more time is needed to bridge these gaps in a meaningful and durable way.” Tedros expressed support for IGWG’s decision to resume negotiations in about four weeks. “This pause is not a setback. It’s an opportunity. It allows us to reflect, to consult further with our capitals, and to return with renewed clarity and flexibility, not to keep negotiating indefinitely, but to continue and to close the deal.” However, tension was palpable at the start of the sixth – and supposedly final – round of talks last Monday when the African region rejected the Bureau’s draft of the PABS Annex. Leading Africa’s position, South Africa and Namibia proposed that the draft text circulated by the IGWG Bureau on 9 March should be disregarded in favour of the on-screen text considered at the end of the fifth IGWG meeting on 14 February. African regional ambassadors had resolved to stick to this text as they had not had time to consult their capitals on the new draft, Namibia reported. After some tension during the closed session, member states accepted this position. The message from one African country after another was that they would not allow a repeat of the inequity seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, and would not compromise on certain key issues. These include that the countries sharing pathogens need guaranteed benefits, and that the PABS annex needs “legal certainty”, including contracts for commercial users of pathogen information. Burkina Faso, speaking for the WHO Africa and Egypt, Sudan, Libya and Somalia, noted that registration should be mandatory for all users of the PABS system, benefit-sharing obligations should be clearer, and there should be more capcity-building –including technology transfer – for developing countries. New Funding Models Needed as Global Health Faces Growing Financial Strain 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Christoph Benn (left) and Patrick Silborn Global health is facing a funding crisis. Aid is shrinking, debt is rising, and the needs are only increasing. According to Christoph Benn of the Joep Lange Institute and Patrik Silborn of UNICEF Afghanistan, health systems will need to fundamentally rethink how they finance and sustain care. On a recent episode of the Global Health Matters podcast, host Gary Aslanyan was joined by these two experts, who said “innovative finance” has become central to discussions on sustaining health systems. Benn said that while the term is widely used, few agree on what it actually means. He described it as a “spectrum” of approaches, ranging from philanthropic grants and conditional funding to private-sector investment models that expect financial returns. “It has frustrated us deeply that so many people are talking about innovative finance, but very few actually know what they’re talking about,” Benn said. Silborn emphasised that these mechanisms should not be treated as one-size-fits-all solutions. Instead, financing models must be designed around specific problems whether that means raising new funds, improving efficiency, or linking payments to measurable outcomes. Drawing on his experience in Rwanda, Silborn described how a results-based funding model tied disbursements directly to performance, helping the country to maintain progress against major diseases despite reduced funding. Both experts stressed that private-sector engagement requires a clear understanding of incentives. “Private corporations are not charities,” Benn said. They can, however, contribute through marketing partnerships, technical expertise, or investment models that align financial returns with social outcomes. Looking ahead, Benn pointed to targeted taxes and debt swaps as among the most scalable tools. Still, both warned that innovative finance is not a substitute for public responsibility. “It only works when it is designed to solve real problems in specific contexts,” Benn said, underscoring that strong systems and governance remain essential to any lasting solution. Listen to the full episode >> Read more about Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Global Health Needs Rethink as Systems Fall Behind 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Dr Garry Aslanyan and Axel R. Pries Global health leaders say the world needs to rethink how it approaches health, arguing that outdated systems, narrow thinking, and lack of coordination are slowing progress at a time of growing challenges. Speaking on the Global Health Matters podcast, Axel Pries, president of the World Health Summit, told host Dr Gary Aslanyan that improving health outcomes will require broader cooperation across sectors, stronger communication, and a shift toward prevention. Listen to the full episode >> Pries said it was “clear that we needed politics, civil society and also the private sector.” He argued that global health can no longer be driven by governments and medical professionals alone, and that progress depends on open collaboration between actors with different interests. While concerns remain, especially around the private sector, he said these partnerships are key to turning research into real-world results. He also pointed to shifting global power, saying institutions created after World War II need to adapt to a more multipolar world. Countries like India, Brazil, and those across Africa should have a bigger role in shaping global health. At the same time, he said core values, especially a shared commitment to health equity, must stay the same. Pries also highlighted challenges in how global health is communicated. Too often, the term is misunderstood as a niche issue affecting distant regions, rather than something that directly impacts everyday life. “It’s everything, everywhere. It’s at our doorstep,” Pries said. Looking ahead, he called for greater engagement from finance and political leaders, and a stronger focus on prevention rather than crisis response.Without that shift, he warned, health systems will remain reactive rather than resilient. Listen to more Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Available Cervical Cancer Vaccines Fail to Cover the HPV 35 Genotype Common in Africa 26/03/2026 Elaine Ruth Fletcher “Cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity:” Ambassador Leslie Ramsammy, Guyana (center). Left, UN Ambassadors Clara Delgado and Antje Leenderste of Capo Verde and Germany. Right, CeHDI CEO Haileyesus Getahun and Colin Murdoch, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean Statees (OECS). The Human papillomavirus (HPV35), globally associated with only 2% of invasive cervical cancers (ICC), has a disproportionately higher prevalence in sub‐Saharan Africa, reaching rates of 22-30% in some countries among women with ICC lesions, according to a new study. Recently, a high-level panel called for redoubled efforts in HPV vaccination, screening and treatment to meet the WHO Global Strategy targets for 2030 – and eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 worldwide. Midway along the route toward the WHO 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination, some 340,000 women a year, mostly in low-income countries, are still dying from cervical cancer – due to the dearth of simple solutions like screening, treatment off pre-cancerous cells, and low HPV vaccination coverage for adolescent girls. Meanwhile, HPV 35—a genotype of the HPV virus that is steadily spreading throughout Africa—is not targeted by existing vaccine formulations. This highlights the urgent need to speed up research and development to create an updated vaccine. At the same time, success stories from a handful of developing countries such as Rwanda demonstrate that the 2030 targets for 90% HPV vaccine coverage, 70% screening and 90% treatment can be attained – when political will exists. Meeting those targets would put countries on track to meeting the global elimination goal of less than 4 cervical cancer cases annually per 100 000 women as early as 2050. Those were key messages emerging from a recent high-level seminar on a Cervical Cancer-Free Future, convened by the Center for Global Health Development and Inclusion (CeHDI) together with the UN in Geneva ambassadors of Barbados, Germany, Guyana and Malawi. “Although cervical cancer is both preventable and curable when detected early, it remains the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death among women worldwide,” said Guyana’s ambassador, Leslie Ramsammy. “In Guyana, for example, it is the number two cause of cancer deaths among women. For some countries, it’s the number one cause of cancer death among women each year.” About 600,000 women annually are diagnosed with cervical cancer, representing 6.5% of new cancer cases and 7.7% of cancer deaths. And 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. As such, “cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity,” he added. The goal: global elimination of cervical cancer by 2050 Countries must reach the WHO 2030 targets for diagnosis and treatment in order to reach the goal of cervical cancer elimination by 2050. Most developed countries are on a trajectory to meet the WHO 2030 goals and moving on from there, to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health risk by 2050. However, developing countries are on a much longer trajectory. And at current rates of progress, most will only reach elimination in 2120, said Ramsammy. “Today’s High-Level dialog is a call to change the trajectory for elimination from 2120 to earlier… closer to 2050 when many European countries and North America would have achieved elimination.” Said Ramsammy, “The question is no longer whether cervical cancer can be eliminated, but when and whether the world will mobilize the political will and resources needed to ensure that no woman dies from a preventable disease. Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer.” Incidence rates in African countries 10–20 times higher than 2030 goal Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are heavily concentrated in low-and middle-incomee countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most developed countries already have a cervical cancer incidence of between 10-4 cases annually per 100 000 women – with 4/100 000 being the elimination threshold. But many countries in Africa have cervical cancer incidence of 60-70 or even eighty cases annually per 100 000 women, said Nathalie Broutet, of the University of Sydney, Australia, citing Malawi and Eswatini as examples. As a former WHO staff member, Broutet helped draft the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2020. To get on course for elimination “we need to reach the 2030 targets, which are 90% HPV vaccination coverage; 70% of women screened with a high performance, twice in a lifetime; and 90% of women detected with a cervical disease treated,” she said. In terms of vaccination, for instance, apart from the region of the Americas, which has almost reached 80% coverage, all other WHO regions remain far behind the 90% goal for 2030. “So, the work that we have to do to reach 90% is enormous,” said Broutet. Better adapted vaccines – the missing HPV 35 genotype Nathalie Broutet, University of Sydney aand former WHO cervical cancer specialist. However, along with more uptake of HPV vaccination, HPV vaccines need to be better adapted to the needs of girls and women in low- and middle–income populations. And recent research undertaken by CeHDI together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is pointing to a big gap in Africa. That is the lack of vaccine coverage for the HPV 35 genotype, which now a common subtype of the virus in Africa, in comparison to the rest of the world. “This is a genotype which is very common in African countries, which is responsible for around even more than 4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa,” said Broutet. “Yet this genotype is not included in the current HPV vaccine.” One brand-new study points to an even higher incidence, said Haileyesus Getahun, CEO of CeHDI, citing a new review of the “Burden of HPV 35 in African Cervical Pathologies” in the journal Medical Virology. That peer-reviewed study published this month, cites HPV35 prevalence of 19-30% in Mozambique, 22-26% in Kenya, 17% in South Africa and 11% in Zimbabwe and Tanzania among women with ICC lesions. In women with pre-cancerous lesions, rates of 20-26% were found in Botswana and Tanzania. In sharp contrast, studies from China, Canada, Sweden and Europe pointed to a prevalence of less than 1%. Globally, the prevalence among women with ICC lesions was only 2%. “Specifically, HPV35 has been more frequently associated with precancerous cervical lesions and accounts for a significant proportion of ICC [invasive cervical carcinoma] (4%–10%) in these populations, with a higher fraction than that observed in other regions,” concludes the authors from the University of Cape Town, South Africa; as well as medical research faculties in Tanzania, Botswana and Zimbabwe. HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer. Overcoming the key problems in service delivery For cervical cancer, school-based HPV vaccination delivery is critical. There are cited three key problems in service delivery, vaccination gaps, lack of access to low-cost HPV testing and related laboratory services; and lack of access to cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, which are out of reach in most rural clinics and in the public health systems of many urban centres. To overcome the challenges, global experts recommend the following: School-based vaccination – This is the first time a vaccine must be delivered to an adolescent population, leading to challenges with both disinformation as well as the need to put new systems in place. “We know in countries that use school- based delivery has been quite a success,” said Broutet. “Gender-neutral vaccination can improve the coverage and lift barriers that we see regarding the HPV vaccination of girls-only; and strong community engagement – communication needs to be in place. In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Shift from Pap smears to HPV testing – In high income countries with high rates of cervical cancer screening, the most used test remains the Pap smear – a cytology-based test. In low income countries BIA or bioimpedance screening, which uses electrical signals to detect abnormal cells, has been widely used as well due to its low–cost and rapid results. But WHO as well as many national health systems are now recommending a shift to HPV testing, widely regarded as more accurate and ultimately more cost-efficient. That involves testing specifically for the human papillomavirus genotypes that are the most common cause of cancer. “Even in countries that we think reach 70% coverage, there is a lot of work to be done to switch out the existing technology, which is basically cytology, and in low-income countries, BIA. Instead, all countries need to switch toward HPV testing,” says Broutet. “And we need also to ensure that innovation is available, and one of them is self-sampling, so self-collection and also urine samples. We need to ensure that all countries have access to this technology.” Self-screening and community-based treatment – Treatment immediately following screening is the third basic tool needed to reach elimination targets. Such treatment can remove pre-cancerous cells before they develop further. “Mobile screening clinics can be an option to increase coverage, task shifting to community health workers,” said Broutet. “This expands coverage. And finally, digital registry [of screening results]. We need to follow up and track women who have been screened to ensure those with a positive test have been treated.” Improving vaccine composition HPV 35 is one of five highly invasive genotypes not now covered by vaccines, responsible for an outsized proportion of cancers in Africa. Improving vaccine composition is also a critical mission, said Getahun. Together with IARC, CeHDI is supporting an even more thorough African and global review of the evidence on the HPV 35 genotype and its burden. “Our collaboration with IARC will help generate the evidence needed to inform the development of next-generation HPV vaccines that better reflect regional disease patterns, including the burden of HPV 35 in sub-Saharan Africa,” he observed. “Going forward we hope this will stimulate dialogue with the manufacturers, countries, WHO and global procurement partners such as Gavi and Unitaid to ensure that this genotype is included in the next generation of vaccines, particularly those deployed in Africa.” Currently, none of the main HPV vaccine manufacturers, which include the UK- and USA-based GSK and MSD(Merck), as well as the Serum Institute of India and two Chinese firms include HPV 35 in their vaccine formulations. However, a 14-valent vaccine by another leading Chinese pharma innovator, Sinocelltech, has a 14-valent vaccine SCT1000 in Phase 3 trials with some 18,000 women, which includes the HPV 35 genotype. “Especially in regions with high HIV prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the application of polyvalent HPV vaccines (including HPV 35) is essential, as people living with HIV are more prone to multiple HPV infections requiring broader protection,” state an October 2025 review by Chiara Paternostro and Elmar Joura, of the Medical University of Vienna. Gavi board: approved inclusion of improved vaccines once available HPV vaccine – Gavi has approved inclusion of improved formulations to protect against more genotypes once available. Asked by Health Policy Watch about the need and potential to update existing vaccines to include the HPV 35 genotype, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, said its board had in 2025 approved the inclusion of improved vaccines covering more virus genotypes in its portfolio as soon as they become available: “Current HPV vaccines are designed to protect against the large majority (70%) of cervical cancers. The importance of this evolving research is that we now have a better understanding of the disease burden of HPV-35 in countries across Africa, which Gavi supports – as well as how that burden is expected to increase over time as other types decrease due to improved vaccine coverage,” a Gavi spokesperson said. “While there are currently no licensed vaccines that provide protection against HPV‑35, the Gavi Board in December 2025 approved, based on WHO and SAGE guidance, an expansion of Gavi’s portfolio so that higher-valent vaccines can be made available to countries as and when they come available. We encourage our manufacturing partners to work with us in helping bring this about.” WHO pointed to a recent systematic review by WHO/IARC (Wei et al. 2024) confirming that HPV35 is part of the remaining known 10 HPV causal genotypes, it causes only about 5% of cases worldwide, “but with some notable regional variations, including a higher proportion (~4%) for HPV 35 in Africa than in other regions.” “Currently, HPV35 is not among the types covered in the two existing, licensed (highest valency) HPV9 vaccines that contain the same 7 oncogenic types (16,18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58),” a spokesperson said. “We are aware additional work is being done on HPV35 that may provide more information on this strain and its contribution to cervical cancer burden– in particular, in the African region. In future that may inform vaccine developers in their choice for additional HPV type to be included in ‘even higher valency’.” Rwanda: on track to beat 2050 global elimination target Two girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka, Rwanda, a country that is on track to reach the 2050 goal for cervical cancer elimination. But vaccination is not in itself an answer. It must be part of a multi-pronged approach. “Over the next 50 years, scaling up screening and treatment could avert up to 14.6 million deaths, three times more than vaccination alone,” noted Cabo Verde’s UN Ambassador in Geneva Clara Delgado and a member of the Unitaid Executive Board. Since 2019, Unitaid has introduced HPV testing, self-sampling methods and portable thermal ablation treatment devices (for removal of precancerous lesions) across approximately 50 low- and middle income countries, driving down costs significantly.” Bulk procurement has reduced HPV test prices by 40% and the costs of thermal ablation by 45% “making these lifesaving tools affordable where they are needed most.” But just as important are country models that work, she stressed, citing Rwanda, South Africa, Malawi and the Philippines as “champion” examples. “For example, in Rwanda with Unitaid’s partnership since 2019, a national screen and treat program now operates in over half of the country. Women in rural communities are being reached through HPV self-collection kits, a simple, dignified approach that brings services closer to home, breaking barriers of distance, stigma and cost. As a result of the partnership, Rwanda is on track to beat the 2030 elimination targets by three years, “proving that elimination is not just possible, but achievable.” Repeating the success of smallpox eradication “Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer by 2050,” said Ramsammy, “Today we have an opportunity to elevate cervical cancer elimination on the multilateral agenda as a matter of equity, gender justice and the right to health.” Said Getahun, “At a time when global solidarity and multilateralism are under strain, health diplomacy is more important than ever in strengthening North–South and South–South cooperation and advancing the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer.” Adds Broutet, “We have a generation to end cervical cancer, and we have the tools,” citing national elimination targets; sustainable financing; regional cooperation to decrease the price of the tools and investing in treatment infrastructure as key political levers. “The science exists, the roadmap exists, but the inequity persists. Political will determines the outcome.” Most important is the need to address gender inequities. “Each country of the world needs to understand, what are these drivers of inequity in their own country?” she said, citing the late WHO director Mahmoud Fathalla, who once said: “women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. They are dying because societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.” Image Credits: UNICEF, WHO , N. Broutet/WHO, ecancer.org, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, Broutet, Gavi, HPV World . US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Pandemic Agreement Talks Get Five More Negotiating Days 30/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, addressing IGWG6 on Saturday evening. With no agreement in sight, World Health Organization (WHO) member states curtailed talks on the Pandemic Agreement annex five hours earlier than scheduled on Saturday night, resolving to meet again within a month for a further five days of negotiations. Member states will reconvene between 27 April and 1 May to negotiate further on the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) annex, with the hope of tabling the annex at the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May. The PABS annex is intended to ensure, on equal footing, the rapid sharing of pathogens with pandemic potential and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their use, including vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics. Addressing the tired delegates of the Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) after six days of intense talks, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that their efforts had not been wasted. “At the same time, we must be candid,” said Tedros. “Despite best efforts, differences remain on key issues. These are not trivial matters. They go to the heart of equity, access, sovereignty and global solidarity. It’s therefore understandable that more time is needed to bridge these gaps in a meaningful and durable way.” Tedros expressed support for IGWG’s decision to resume negotiations in about four weeks. “This pause is not a setback. It’s an opportunity. It allows us to reflect, to consult further with our capitals, and to return with renewed clarity and flexibility, not to keep negotiating indefinitely, but to continue and to close the deal.” However, tension was palpable at the start of the sixth – and supposedly final – round of talks last Monday when the African region rejected the Bureau’s draft of the PABS Annex. Leading Africa’s position, South Africa and Namibia proposed that the draft text circulated by the IGWG Bureau on 9 March should be disregarded in favour of the on-screen text considered at the end of the fifth IGWG meeting on 14 February. African regional ambassadors had resolved to stick to this text as they had not had time to consult their capitals on the new draft, Namibia reported. After some tension during the closed session, member states accepted this position. The message from one African country after another was that they would not allow a repeat of the inequity seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, and would not compromise on certain key issues. These include that the countries sharing pathogens need guaranteed benefits, and that the PABS annex needs “legal certainty”, including contracts for commercial users of pathogen information. Burkina Faso, speaking for the WHO Africa and Egypt, Sudan, Libya and Somalia, noted that registration should be mandatory for all users of the PABS system, benefit-sharing obligations should be clearer, and there should be more capcity-building –including technology transfer – for developing countries. New Funding Models Needed as Global Health Faces Growing Financial Strain 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Christoph Benn (left) and Patrick Silborn Global health is facing a funding crisis. Aid is shrinking, debt is rising, and the needs are only increasing. According to Christoph Benn of the Joep Lange Institute and Patrik Silborn of UNICEF Afghanistan, health systems will need to fundamentally rethink how they finance and sustain care. On a recent episode of the Global Health Matters podcast, host Gary Aslanyan was joined by these two experts, who said “innovative finance” has become central to discussions on sustaining health systems. Benn said that while the term is widely used, few agree on what it actually means. He described it as a “spectrum” of approaches, ranging from philanthropic grants and conditional funding to private-sector investment models that expect financial returns. “It has frustrated us deeply that so many people are talking about innovative finance, but very few actually know what they’re talking about,” Benn said. Silborn emphasised that these mechanisms should not be treated as one-size-fits-all solutions. Instead, financing models must be designed around specific problems whether that means raising new funds, improving efficiency, or linking payments to measurable outcomes. Drawing on his experience in Rwanda, Silborn described how a results-based funding model tied disbursements directly to performance, helping the country to maintain progress against major diseases despite reduced funding. Both experts stressed that private-sector engagement requires a clear understanding of incentives. “Private corporations are not charities,” Benn said. They can, however, contribute through marketing partnerships, technical expertise, or investment models that align financial returns with social outcomes. Looking ahead, Benn pointed to targeted taxes and debt swaps as among the most scalable tools. Still, both warned that innovative finance is not a substitute for public responsibility. “It only works when it is designed to solve real problems in specific contexts,” Benn said, underscoring that strong systems and governance remain essential to any lasting solution. Listen to the full episode >> Read more about Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Global Health Needs Rethink as Systems Fall Behind 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Dr Garry Aslanyan and Axel R. Pries Global health leaders say the world needs to rethink how it approaches health, arguing that outdated systems, narrow thinking, and lack of coordination are slowing progress at a time of growing challenges. Speaking on the Global Health Matters podcast, Axel Pries, president of the World Health Summit, told host Dr Gary Aslanyan that improving health outcomes will require broader cooperation across sectors, stronger communication, and a shift toward prevention. Listen to the full episode >> Pries said it was “clear that we needed politics, civil society and also the private sector.” He argued that global health can no longer be driven by governments and medical professionals alone, and that progress depends on open collaboration between actors with different interests. While concerns remain, especially around the private sector, he said these partnerships are key to turning research into real-world results. He also pointed to shifting global power, saying institutions created after World War II need to adapt to a more multipolar world. Countries like India, Brazil, and those across Africa should have a bigger role in shaping global health. At the same time, he said core values, especially a shared commitment to health equity, must stay the same. Pries also highlighted challenges in how global health is communicated. Too often, the term is misunderstood as a niche issue affecting distant regions, rather than something that directly impacts everyday life. “It’s everything, everywhere. It’s at our doorstep,” Pries said. Looking ahead, he called for greater engagement from finance and political leaders, and a stronger focus on prevention rather than crisis response.Without that shift, he warned, health systems will remain reactive rather than resilient. Listen to more Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Available Cervical Cancer Vaccines Fail to Cover the HPV 35 Genotype Common in Africa 26/03/2026 Elaine Ruth Fletcher “Cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity:” Ambassador Leslie Ramsammy, Guyana (center). Left, UN Ambassadors Clara Delgado and Antje Leenderste of Capo Verde and Germany. Right, CeHDI CEO Haileyesus Getahun and Colin Murdoch, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean Statees (OECS). The Human papillomavirus (HPV35), globally associated with only 2% of invasive cervical cancers (ICC), has a disproportionately higher prevalence in sub‐Saharan Africa, reaching rates of 22-30% in some countries among women with ICC lesions, according to a new study. Recently, a high-level panel called for redoubled efforts in HPV vaccination, screening and treatment to meet the WHO Global Strategy targets for 2030 – and eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 worldwide. Midway along the route toward the WHO 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination, some 340,000 women a year, mostly in low-income countries, are still dying from cervical cancer – due to the dearth of simple solutions like screening, treatment off pre-cancerous cells, and low HPV vaccination coverage for adolescent girls. Meanwhile, HPV 35—a genotype of the HPV virus that is steadily spreading throughout Africa—is not targeted by existing vaccine formulations. This highlights the urgent need to speed up research and development to create an updated vaccine. At the same time, success stories from a handful of developing countries such as Rwanda demonstrate that the 2030 targets for 90% HPV vaccine coverage, 70% screening and 90% treatment can be attained – when political will exists. Meeting those targets would put countries on track to meeting the global elimination goal of less than 4 cervical cancer cases annually per 100 000 women as early as 2050. Those were key messages emerging from a recent high-level seminar on a Cervical Cancer-Free Future, convened by the Center for Global Health Development and Inclusion (CeHDI) together with the UN in Geneva ambassadors of Barbados, Germany, Guyana and Malawi. “Although cervical cancer is both preventable and curable when detected early, it remains the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death among women worldwide,” said Guyana’s ambassador, Leslie Ramsammy. “In Guyana, for example, it is the number two cause of cancer deaths among women. For some countries, it’s the number one cause of cancer death among women each year.” About 600,000 women annually are diagnosed with cervical cancer, representing 6.5% of new cancer cases and 7.7% of cancer deaths. And 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. As such, “cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity,” he added. The goal: global elimination of cervical cancer by 2050 Countries must reach the WHO 2030 targets for diagnosis and treatment in order to reach the goal of cervical cancer elimination by 2050. Most developed countries are on a trajectory to meet the WHO 2030 goals and moving on from there, to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health risk by 2050. However, developing countries are on a much longer trajectory. And at current rates of progress, most will only reach elimination in 2120, said Ramsammy. “Today’s High-Level dialog is a call to change the trajectory for elimination from 2120 to earlier… closer to 2050 when many European countries and North America would have achieved elimination.” Said Ramsammy, “The question is no longer whether cervical cancer can be eliminated, but when and whether the world will mobilize the political will and resources needed to ensure that no woman dies from a preventable disease. Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer.” Incidence rates in African countries 10–20 times higher than 2030 goal Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are heavily concentrated in low-and middle-incomee countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most developed countries already have a cervical cancer incidence of between 10-4 cases annually per 100 000 women – with 4/100 000 being the elimination threshold. But many countries in Africa have cervical cancer incidence of 60-70 or even eighty cases annually per 100 000 women, said Nathalie Broutet, of the University of Sydney, Australia, citing Malawi and Eswatini as examples. As a former WHO staff member, Broutet helped draft the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2020. To get on course for elimination “we need to reach the 2030 targets, which are 90% HPV vaccination coverage; 70% of women screened with a high performance, twice in a lifetime; and 90% of women detected with a cervical disease treated,” she said. In terms of vaccination, for instance, apart from the region of the Americas, which has almost reached 80% coverage, all other WHO regions remain far behind the 90% goal for 2030. “So, the work that we have to do to reach 90% is enormous,” said Broutet. Better adapted vaccines – the missing HPV 35 genotype Nathalie Broutet, University of Sydney aand former WHO cervical cancer specialist. However, along with more uptake of HPV vaccination, HPV vaccines need to be better adapted to the needs of girls and women in low- and middle–income populations. And recent research undertaken by CeHDI together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is pointing to a big gap in Africa. That is the lack of vaccine coverage for the HPV 35 genotype, which now a common subtype of the virus in Africa, in comparison to the rest of the world. “This is a genotype which is very common in African countries, which is responsible for around even more than 4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa,” said Broutet. “Yet this genotype is not included in the current HPV vaccine.” One brand-new study points to an even higher incidence, said Haileyesus Getahun, CEO of CeHDI, citing a new review of the “Burden of HPV 35 in African Cervical Pathologies” in the journal Medical Virology. That peer-reviewed study published this month, cites HPV35 prevalence of 19-30% in Mozambique, 22-26% in Kenya, 17% in South Africa and 11% in Zimbabwe and Tanzania among women with ICC lesions. In women with pre-cancerous lesions, rates of 20-26% were found in Botswana and Tanzania. In sharp contrast, studies from China, Canada, Sweden and Europe pointed to a prevalence of less than 1%. Globally, the prevalence among women with ICC lesions was only 2%. “Specifically, HPV35 has been more frequently associated with precancerous cervical lesions and accounts for a significant proportion of ICC [invasive cervical carcinoma] (4%–10%) in these populations, with a higher fraction than that observed in other regions,” concludes the authors from the University of Cape Town, South Africa; as well as medical research faculties in Tanzania, Botswana and Zimbabwe. HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer. Overcoming the key problems in service delivery For cervical cancer, school-based HPV vaccination delivery is critical. There are cited three key problems in service delivery, vaccination gaps, lack of access to low-cost HPV testing and related laboratory services; and lack of access to cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, which are out of reach in most rural clinics and in the public health systems of many urban centres. To overcome the challenges, global experts recommend the following: School-based vaccination – This is the first time a vaccine must be delivered to an adolescent population, leading to challenges with both disinformation as well as the need to put new systems in place. “We know in countries that use school- based delivery has been quite a success,” said Broutet. “Gender-neutral vaccination can improve the coverage and lift barriers that we see regarding the HPV vaccination of girls-only; and strong community engagement – communication needs to be in place. In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Shift from Pap smears to HPV testing – In high income countries with high rates of cervical cancer screening, the most used test remains the Pap smear – a cytology-based test. In low income countries BIA or bioimpedance screening, which uses electrical signals to detect abnormal cells, has been widely used as well due to its low–cost and rapid results. But WHO as well as many national health systems are now recommending a shift to HPV testing, widely regarded as more accurate and ultimately more cost-efficient. That involves testing specifically for the human papillomavirus genotypes that are the most common cause of cancer. “Even in countries that we think reach 70% coverage, there is a lot of work to be done to switch out the existing technology, which is basically cytology, and in low-income countries, BIA. Instead, all countries need to switch toward HPV testing,” says Broutet. “And we need also to ensure that innovation is available, and one of them is self-sampling, so self-collection and also urine samples. We need to ensure that all countries have access to this technology.” Self-screening and community-based treatment – Treatment immediately following screening is the third basic tool needed to reach elimination targets. Such treatment can remove pre-cancerous cells before they develop further. “Mobile screening clinics can be an option to increase coverage, task shifting to community health workers,” said Broutet. “This expands coverage. And finally, digital registry [of screening results]. We need to follow up and track women who have been screened to ensure those with a positive test have been treated.” Improving vaccine composition HPV 35 is one of five highly invasive genotypes not now covered by vaccines, responsible for an outsized proportion of cancers in Africa. Improving vaccine composition is also a critical mission, said Getahun. Together with IARC, CeHDI is supporting an even more thorough African and global review of the evidence on the HPV 35 genotype and its burden. “Our collaboration with IARC will help generate the evidence needed to inform the development of next-generation HPV vaccines that better reflect regional disease patterns, including the burden of HPV 35 in sub-Saharan Africa,” he observed. “Going forward we hope this will stimulate dialogue with the manufacturers, countries, WHO and global procurement partners such as Gavi and Unitaid to ensure that this genotype is included in the next generation of vaccines, particularly those deployed in Africa.” Currently, none of the main HPV vaccine manufacturers, which include the UK- and USA-based GSK and MSD(Merck), as well as the Serum Institute of India and two Chinese firms include HPV 35 in their vaccine formulations. However, a 14-valent vaccine by another leading Chinese pharma innovator, Sinocelltech, has a 14-valent vaccine SCT1000 in Phase 3 trials with some 18,000 women, which includes the HPV 35 genotype. “Especially in regions with high HIV prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the application of polyvalent HPV vaccines (including HPV 35) is essential, as people living with HIV are more prone to multiple HPV infections requiring broader protection,” state an October 2025 review by Chiara Paternostro and Elmar Joura, of the Medical University of Vienna. Gavi board: approved inclusion of improved vaccines once available HPV vaccine – Gavi has approved inclusion of improved formulations to protect against more genotypes once available. Asked by Health Policy Watch about the need and potential to update existing vaccines to include the HPV 35 genotype, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, said its board had in 2025 approved the inclusion of improved vaccines covering more virus genotypes in its portfolio as soon as they become available: “Current HPV vaccines are designed to protect against the large majority (70%) of cervical cancers. The importance of this evolving research is that we now have a better understanding of the disease burden of HPV-35 in countries across Africa, which Gavi supports – as well as how that burden is expected to increase over time as other types decrease due to improved vaccine coverage,” a Gavi spokesperson said. “While there are currently no licensed vaccines that provide protection against HPV‑35, the Gavi Board in December 2025 approved, based on WHO and SAGE guidance, an expansion of Gavi’s portfolio so that higher-valent vaccines can be made available to countries as and when they come available. We encourage our manufacturing partners to work with us in helping bring this about.” WHO pointed to a recent systematic review by WHO/IARC (Wei et al. 2024) confirming that HPV35 is part of the remaining known 10 HPV causal genotypes, it causes only about 5% of cases worldwide, “but with some notable regional variations, including a higher proportion (~4%) for HPV 35 in Africa than in other regions.” “Currently, HPV35 is not among the types covered in the two existing, licensed (highest valency) HPV9 vaccines that contain the same 7 oncogenic types (16,18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58),” a spokesperson said. “We are aware additional work is being done on HPV35 that may provide more information on this strain and its contribution to cervical cancer burden– in particular, in the African region. In future that may inform vaccine developers in their choice for additional HPV type to be included in ‘even higher valency’.” Rwanda: on track to beat 2050 global elimination target Two girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka, Rwanda, a country that is on track to reach the 2050 goal for cervical cancer elimination. But vaccination is not in itself an answer. It must be part of a multi-pronged approach. “Over the next 50 years, scaling up screening and treatment could avert up to 14.6 million deaths, three times more than vaccination alone,” noted Cabo Verde’s UN Ambassador in Geneva Clara Delgado and a member of the Unitaid Executive Board. Since 2019, Unitaid has introduced HPV testing, self-sampling methods and portable thermal ablation treatment devices (for removal of precancerous lesions) across approximately 50 low- and middle income countries, driving down costs significantly.” Bulk procurement has reduced HPV test prices by 40% and the costs of thermal ablation by 45% “making these lifesaving tools affordable where they are needed most.” But just as important are country models that work, she stressed, citing Rwanda, South Africa, Malawi and the Philippines as “champion” examples. “For example, in Rwanda with Unitaid’s partnership since 2019, a national screen and treat program now operates in over half of the country. Women in rural communities are being reached through HPV self-collection kits, a simple, dignified approach that brings services closer to home, breaking barriers of distance, stigma and cost. As a result of the partnership, Rwanda is on track to beat the 2030 elimination targets by three years, “proving that elimination is not just possible, but achievable.” Repeating the success of smallpox eradication “Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer by 2050,” said Ramsammy, “Today we have an opportunity to elevate cervical cancer elimination on the multilateral agenda as a matter of equity, gender justice and the right to health.” Said Getahun, “At a time when global solidarity and multilateralism are under strain, health diplomacy is more important than ever in strengthening North–South and South–South cooperation and advancing the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer.” Adds Broutet, “We have a generation to end cervical cancer, and we have the tools,” citing national elimination targets; sustainable financing; regional cooperation to decrease the price of the tools and investing in treatment infrastructure as key political levers. “The science exists, the roadmap exists, but the inequity persists. Political will determines the outcome.” Most important is the need to address gender inequities. “Each country of the world needs to understand, what are these drivers of inequity in their own country?” she said, citing the late WHO director Mahmoud Fathalla, who once said: “women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. They are dying because societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.” Image Credits: UNICEF, WHO , N. Broutet/WHO, ecancer.org, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, Broutet, Gavi, HPV World . US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
New Funding Models Needed as Global Health Faces Growing Financial Strain 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Christoph Benn (left) and Patrick Silborn Global health is facing a funding crisis. Aid is shrinking, debt is rising, and the needs are only increasing. According to Christoph Benn of the Joep Lange Institute and Patrik Silborn of UNICEF Afghanistan, health systems will need to fundamentally rethink how they finance and sustain care. On a recent episode of the Global Health Matters podcast, host Gary Aslanyan was joined by these two experts, who said “innovative finance” has become central to discussions on sustaining health systems. Benn said that while the term is widely used, few agree on what it actually means. He described it as a “spectrum” of approaches, ranging from philanthropic grants and conditional funding to private-sector investment models that expect financial returns. “It has frustrated us deeply that so many people are talking about innovative finance, but very few actually know what they’re talking about,” Benn said. Silborn emphasised that these mechanisms should not be treated as one-size-fits-all solutions. Instead, financing models must be designed around specific problems whether that means raising new funds, improving efficiency, or linking payments to measurable outcomes. Drawing on his experience in Rwanda, Silborn described how a results-based funding model tied disbursements directly to performance, helping the country to maintain progress against major diseases despite reduced funding. Both experts stressed that private-sector engagement requires a clear understanding of incentives. “Private corporations are not charities,” Benn said. They can, however, contribute through marketing partnerships, technical expertise, or investment models that align financial returns with social outcomes. Looking ahead, Benn pointed to targeted taxes and debt swaps as among the most scalable tools. Still, both warned that innovative finance is not a substitute for public responsibility. “It only works when it is designed to solve real problems in specific contexts,” Benn said, underscoring that strong systems and governance remain essential to any lasting solution. Listen to the full episode >> Read more about Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Global Health Needs Rethink as Systems Fall Behind 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Dr Garry Aslanyan and Axel R. Pries Global health leaders say the world needs to rethink how it approaches health, arguing that outdated systems, narrow thinking, and lack of coordination are slowing progress at a time of growing challenges. Speaking on the Global Health Matters podcast, Axel Pries, president of the World Health Summit, told host Dr Gary Aslanyan that improving health outcomes will require broader cooperation across sectors, stronger communication, and a shift toward prevention. Listen to the full episode >> Pries said it was “clear that we needed politics, civil society and also the private sector.” He argued that global health can no longer be driven by governments and medical professionals alone, and that progress depends on open collaboration between actors with different interests. While concerns remain, especially around the private sector, he said these partnerships are key to turning research into real-world results. He also pointed to shifting global power, saying institutions created after World War II need to adapt to a more multipolar world. Countries like India, Brazil, and those across Africa should have a bigger role in shaping global health. At the same time, he said core values, especially a shared commitment to health equity, must stay the same. Pries also highlighted challenges in how global health is communicated. Too often, the term is misunderstood as a niche issue affecting distant regions, rather than something that directly impacts everyday life. “It’s everything, everywhere. It’s at our doorstep,” Pries said. Looking ahead, he called for greater engagement from finance and political leaders, and a stronger focus on prevention rather than crisis response.Without that shift, he warned, health systems will remain reactive rather than resilient. Listen to more Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Available Cervical Cancer Vaccines Fail to Cover the HPV 35 Genotype Common in Africa 26/03/2026 Elaine Ruth Fletcher “Cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity:” Ambassador Leslie Ramsammy, Guyana (center). Left, UN Ambassadors Clara Delgado and Antje Leenderste of Capo Verde and Germany. Right, CeHDI CEO Haileyesus Getahun and Colin Murdoch, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean Statees (OECS). The Human papillomavirus (HPV35), globally associated with only 2% of invasive cervical cancers (ICC), has a disproportionately higher prevalence in sub‐Saharan Africa, reaching rates of 22-30% in some countries among women with ICC lesions, according to a new study. Recently, a high-level panel called for redoubled efforts in HPV vaccination, screening and treatment to meet the WHO Global Strategy targets for 2030 – and eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 worldwide. Midway along the route toward the WHO 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination, some 340,000 women a year, mostly in low-income countries, are still dying from cervical cancer – due to the dearth of simple solutions like screening, treatment off pre-cancerous cells, and low HPV vaccination coverage for adolescent girls. Meanwhile, HPV 35—a genotype of the HPV virus that is steadily spreading throughout Africa—is not targeted by existing vaccine formulations. This highlights the urgent need to speed up research and development to create an updated vaccine. At the same time, success stories from a handful of developing countries such as Rwanda demonstrate that the 2030 targets for 90% HPV vaccine coverage, 70% screening and 90% treatment can be attained – when political will exists. Meeting those targets would put countries on track to meeting the global elimination goal of less than 4 cervical cancer cases annually per 100 000 women as early as 2050. Those were key messages emerging from a recent high-level seminar on a Cervical Cancer-Free Future, convened by the Center for Global Health Development and Inclusion (CeHDI) together with the UN in Geneva ambassadors of Barbados, Germany, Guyana and Malawi. “Although cervical cancer is both preventable and curable when detected early, it remains the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death among women worldwide,” said Guyana’s ambassador, Leslie Ramsammy. “In Guyana, for example, it is the number two cause of cancer deaths among women. For some countries, it’s the number one cause of cancer death among women each year.” About 600,000 women annually are diagnosed with cervical cancer, representing 6.5% of new cancer cases and 7.7% of cancer deaths. And 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. As such, “cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity,” he added. The goal: global elimination of cervical cancer by 2050 Countries must reach the WHO 2030 targets for diagnosis and treatment in order to reach the goal of cervical cancer elimination by 2050. Most developed countries are on a trajectory to meet the WHO 2030 goals and moving on from there, to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health risk by 2050. However, developing countries are on a much longer trajectory. And at current rates of progress, most will only reach elimination in 2120, said Ramsammy. “Today’s High-Level dialog is a call to change the trajectory for elimination from 2120 to earlier… closer to 2050 when many European countries and North America would have achieved elimination.” Said Ramsammy, “The question is no longer whether cervical cancer can be eliminated, but when and whether the world will mobilize the political will and resources needed to ensure that no woman dies from a preventable disease. Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer.” Incidence rates in African countries 10–20 times higher than 2030 goal Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are heavily concentrated in low-and middle-incomee countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most developed countries already have a cervical cancer incidence of between 10-4 cases annually per 100 000 women – with 4/100 000 being the elimination threshold. But many countries in Africa have cervical cancer incidence of 60-70 or even eighty cases annually per 100 000 women, said Nathalie Broutet, of the University of Sydney, Australia, citing Malawi and Eswatini as examples. As a former WHO staff member, Broutet helped draft the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2020. To get on course for elimination “we need to reach the 2030 targets, which are 90% HPV vaccination coverage; 70% of women screened with a high performance, twice in a lifetime; and 90% of women detected with a cervical disease treated,” she said. In terms of vaccination, for instance, apart from the region of the Americas, which has almost reached 80% coverage, all other WHO regions remain far behind the 90% goal for 2030. “So, the work that we have to do to reach 90% is enormous,” said Broutet. Better adapted vaccines – the missing HPV 35 genotype Nathalie Broutet, University of Sydney aand former WHO cervical cancer specialist. However, along with more uptake of HPV vaccination, HPV vaccines need to be better adapted to the needs of girls and women in low- and middle–income populations. And recent research undertaken by CeHDI together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is pointing to a big gap in Africa. That is the lack of vaccine coverage for the HPV 35 genotype, which now a common subtype of the virus in Africa, in comparison to the rest of the world. “This is a genotype which is very common in African countries, which is responsible for around even more than 4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa,” said Broutet. “Yet this genotype is not included in the current HPV vaccine.” One brand-new study points to an even higher incidence, said Haileyesus Getahun, CEO of CeHDI, citing a new review of the “Burden of HPV 35 in African Cervical Pathologies” in the journal Medical Virology. That peer-reviewed study published this month, cites HPV35 prevalence of 19-30% in Mozambique, 22-26% in Kenya, 17% in South Africa and 11% in Zimbabwe and Tanzania among women with ICC lesions. In women with pre-cancerous lesions, rates of 20-26% were found in Botswana and Tanzania. In sharp contrast, studies from China, Canada, Sweden and Europe pointed to a prevalence of less than 1%. Globally, the prevalence among women with ICC lesions was only 2%. “Specifically, HPV35 has been more frequently associated with precancerous cervical lesions and accounts for a significant proportion of ICC [invasive cervical carcinoma] (4%–10%) in these populations, with a higher fraction than that observed in other regions,” concludes the authors from the University of Cape Town, South Africa; as well as medical research faculties in Tanzania, Botswana and Zimbabwe. HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer. Overcoming the key problems in service delivery For cervical cancer, school-based HPV vaccination delivery is critical. There are cited three key problems in service delivery, vaccination gaps, lack of access to low-cost HPV testing and related laboratory services; and lack of access to cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, which are out of reach in most rural clinics and in the public health systems of many urban centres. To overcome the challenges, global experts recommend the following: School-based vaccination – This is the first time a vaccine must be delivered to an adolescent population, leading to challenges with both disinformation as well as the need to put new systems in place. “We know in countries that use school- based delivery has been quite a success,” said Broutet. “Gender-neutral vaccination can improve the coverage and lift barriers that we see regarding the HPV vaccination of girls-only; and strong community engagement – communication needs to be in place. In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Shift from Pap smears to HPV testing – In high income countries with high rates of cervical cancer screening, the most used test remains the Pap smear – a cytology-based test. In low income countries BIA or bioimpedance screening, which uses electrical signals to detect abnormal cells, has been widely used as well due to its low–cost and rapid results. But WHO as well as many national health systems are now recommending a shift to HPV testing, widely regarded as more accurate and ultimately more cost-efficient. That involves testing specifically for the human papillomavirus genotypes that are the most common cause of cancer. “Even in countries that we think reach 70% coverage, there is a lot of work to be done to switch out the existing technology, which is basically cytology, and in low-income countries, BIA. Instead, all countries need to switch toward HPV testing,” says Broutet. “And we need also to ensure that innovation is available, and one of them is self-sampling, so self-collection and also urine samples. We need to ensure that all countries have access to this technology.” Self-screening and community-based treatment – Treatment immediately following screening is the third basic tool needed to reach elimination targets. Such treatment can remove pre-cancerous cells before they develop further. “Mobile screening clinics can be an option to increase coverage, task shifting to community health workers,” said Broutet. “This expands coverage. And finally, digital registry [of screening results]. We need to follow up and track women who have been screened to ensure those with a positive test have been treated.” Improving vaccine composition HPV 35 is one of five highly invasive genotypes not now covered by vaccines, responsible for an outsized proportion of cancers in Africa. Improving vaccine composition is also a critical mission, said Getahun. Together with IARC, CeHDI is supporting an even more thorough African and global review of the evidence on the HPV 35 genotype and its burden. “Our collaboration with IARC will help generate the evidence needed to inform the development of next-generation HPV vaccines that better reflect regional disease patterns, including the burden of HPV 35 in sub-Saharan Africa,” he observed. “Going forward we hope this will stimulate dialogue with the manufacturers, countries, WHO and global procurement partners such as Gavi and Unitaid to ensure that this genotype is included in the next generation of vaccines, particularly those deployed in Africa.” Currently, none of the main HPV vaccine manufacturers, which include the UK- and USA-based GSK and MSD(Merck), as well as the Serum Institute of India and two Chinese firms include HPV 35 in their vaccine formulations. However, a 14-valent vaccine by another leading Chinese pharma innovator, Sinocelltech, has a 14-valent vaccine SCT1000 in Phase 3 trials with some 18,000 women, which includes the HPV 35 genotype. “Especially in regions with high HIV prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the application of polyvalent HPV vaccines (including HPV 35) is essential, as people living with HIV are more prone to multiple HPV infections requiring broader protection,” state an October 2025 review by Chiara Paternostro and Elmar Joura, of the Medical University of Vienna. Gavi board: approved inclusion of improved vaccines once available HPV vaccine – Gavi has approved inclusion of improved formulations to protect against more genotypes once available. Asked by Health Policy Watch about the need and potential to update existing vaccines to include the HPV 35 genotype, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, said its board had in 2025 approved the inclusion of improved vaccines covering more virus genotypes in its portfolio as soon as they become available: “Current HPV vaccines are designed to protect against the large majority (70%) of cervical cancers. The importance of this evolving research is that we now have a better understanding of the disease burden of HPV-35 in countries across Africa, which Gavi supports – as well as how that burden is expected to increase over time as other types decrease due to improved vaccine coverage,” a Gavi spokesperson said. “While there are currently no licensed vaccines that provide protection against HPV‑35, the Gavi Board in December 2025 approved, based on WHO and SAGE guidance, an expansion of Gavi’s portfolio so that higher-valent vaccines can be made available to countries as and when they come available. We encourage our manufacturing partners to work with us in helping bring this about.” WHO pointed to a recent systematic review by WHO/IARC (Wei et al. 2024) confirming that HPV35 is part of the remaining known 10 HPV causal genotypes, it causes only about 5% of cases worldwide, “but with some notable regional variations, including a higher proportion (~4%) for HPV 35 in Africa than in other regions.” “Currently, HPV35 is not among the types covered in the two existing, licensed (highest valency) HPV9 vaccines that contain the same 7 oncogenic types (16,18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58),” a spokesperson said. “We are aware additional work is being done on HPV35 that may provide more information on this strain and its contribution to cervical cancer burden– in particular, in the African region. In future that may inform vaccine developers in their choice for additional HPV type to be included in ‘even higher valency’.” Rwanda: on track to beat 2050 global elimination target Two girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka, Rwanda, a country that is on track to reach the 2050 goal for cervical cancer elimination. But vaccination is not in itself an answer. It must be part of a multi-pronged approach. “Over the next 50 years, scaling up screening and treatment could avert up to 14.6 million deaths, three times more than vaccination alone,” noted Cabo Verde’s UN Ambassador in Geneva Clara Delgado and a member of the Unitaid Executive Board. Since 2019, Unitaid has introduced HPV testing, self-sampling methods and portable thermal ablation treatment devices (for removal of precancerous lesions) across approximately 50 low- and middle income countries, driving down costs significantly.” Bulk procurement has reduced HPV test prices by 40% and the costs of thermal ablation by 45% “making these lifesaving tools affordable where they are needed most.” But just as important are country models that work, she stressed, citing Rwanda, South Africa, Malawi and the Philippines as “champion” examples. “For example, in Rwanda with Unitaid’s partnership since 2019, a national screen and treat program now operates in over half of the country. Women in rural communities are being reached through HPV self-collection kits, a simple, dignified approach that brings services closer to home, breaking barriers of distance, stigma and cost. As a result of the partnership, Rwanda is on track to beat the 2030 elimination targets by three years, “proving that elimination is not just possible, but achievable.” Repeating the success of smallpox eradication “Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer by 2050,” said Ramsammy, “Today we have an opportunity to elevate cervical cancer elimination on the multilateral agenda as a matter of equity, gender justice and the right to health.” Said Getahun, “At a time when global solidarity and multilateralism are under strain, health diplomacy is more important than ever in strengthening North–South and South–South cooperation and advancing the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer.” Adds Broutet, “We have a generation to end cervical cancer, and we have the tools,” citing national elimination targets; sustainable financing; regional cooperation to decrease the price of the tools and investing in treatment infrastructure as key political levers. “The science exists, the roadmap exists, but the inequity persists. Political will determines the outcome.” Most important is the need to address gender inequities. “Each country of the world needs to understand, what are these drivers of inequity in their own country?” she said, citing the late WHO director Mahmoud Fathalla, who once said: “women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. They are dying because societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.” Image Credits: UNICEF, WHO , N. Broutet/WHO, ecancer.org, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, Broutet, Gavi, HPV World . US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Global Health Needs Rethink as Systems Fall Behind 28/03/2026 Health Policy Watch Dr Garry Aslanyan and Axel R. Pries Global health leaders say the world needs to rethink how it approaches health, arguing that outdated systems, narrow thinking, and lack of coordination are slowing progress at a time of growing challenges. Speaking on the Global Health Matters podcast, Axel Pries, president of the World Health Summit, told host Dr Gary Aslanyan that improving health outcomes will require broader cooperation across sectors, stronger communication, and a shift toward prevention. Listen to the full episode >> Pries said it was “clear that we needed politics, civil society and also the private sector.” He argued that global health can no longer be driven by governments and medical professionals alone, and that progress depends on open collaboration between actors with different interests. While concerns remain, especially around the private sector, he said these partnerships are key to turning research into real-world results. He also pointed to shifting global power, saying institutions created after World War II need to adapt to a more multipolar world. Countries like India, Brazil, and those across Africa should have a bigger role in shaping global health. At the same time, he said core values, especially a shared commitment to health equity, must stay the same. Pries also highlighted challenges in how global health is communicated. Too often, the term is misunderstood as a niche issue affecting distant regions, rather than something that directly impacts everyday life. “It’s everything, everywhere. It’s at our doorstep,” Pries said. Looking ahead, he called for greater engagement from finance and political leaders, and a stronger focus on prevention rather than crisis response.Without that shift, he warned, health systems will remain reactive rather than resilient. Listen to more Global Health Matters podcasts on Health Policy Watch >> Image Credits: Global Health Matters podcast. Available Cervical Cancer Vaccines Fail to Cover the HPV 35 Genotype Common in Africa 26/03/2026 Elaine Ruth Fletcher “Cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity:” Ambassador Leslie Ramsammy, Guyana (center). Left, UN Ambassadors Clara Delgado and Antje Leenderste of Capo Verde and Germany. Right, CeHDI CEO Haileyesus Getahun and Colin Murdoch, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean Statees (OECS). The Human papillomavirus (HPV35), globally associated with only 2% of invasive cervical cancers (ICC), has a disproportionately higher prevalence in sub‐Saharan Africa, reaching rates of 22-30% in some countries among women with ICC lesions, according to a new study. Recently, a high-level panel called for redoubled efforts in HPV vaccination, screening and treatment to meet the WHO Global Strategy targets for 2030 – and eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 worldwide. Midway along the route toward the WHO 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination, some 340,000 women a year, mostly in low-income countries, are still dying from cervical cancer – due to the dearth of simple solutions like screening, treatment off pre-cancerous cells, and low HPV vaccination coverage for adolescent girls. Meanwhile, HPV 35—a genotype of the HPV virus that is steadily spreading throughout Africa—is not targeted by existing vaccine formulations. This highlights the urgent need to speed up research and development to create an updated vaccine. At the same time, success stories from a handful of developing countries such as Rwanda demonstrate that the 2030 targets for 90% HPV vaccine coverage, 70% screening and 90% treatment can be attained – when political will exists. Meeting those targets would put countries on track to meeting the global elimination goal of less than 4 cervical cancer cases annually per 100 000 women as early as 2050. Those were key messages emerging from a recent high-level seminar on a Cervical Cancer-Free Future, convened by the Center for Global Health Development and Inclusion (CeHDI) together with the UN in Geneva ambassadors of Barbados, Germany, Guyana and Malawi. “Although cervical cancer is both preventable and curable when detected early, it remains the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death among women worldwide,” said Guyana’s ambassador, Leslie Ramsammy. “In Guyana, for example, it is the number two cause of cancer deaths among women. For some countries, it’s the number one cause of cancer death among women each year.” About 600,000 women annually are diagnosed with cervical cancer, representing 6.5% of new cancer cases and 7.7% of cancer deaths. And 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. As such, “cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity,” he added. The goal: global elimination of cervical cancer by 2050 Countries must reach the WHO 2030 targets for diagnosis and treatment in order to reach the goal of cervical cancer elimination by 2050. Most developed countries are on a trajectory to meet the WHO 2030 goals and moving on from there, to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health risk by 2050. However, developing countries are on a much longer trajectory. And at current rates of progress, most will only reach elimination in 2120, said Ramsammy. “Today’s High-Level dialog is a call to change the trajectory for elimination from 2120 to earlier… closer to 2050 when many European countries and North America would have achieved elimination.” Said Ramsammy, “The question is no longer whether cervical cancer can be eliminated, but when and whether the world will mobilize the political will and resources needed to ensure that no woman dies from a preventable disease. Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer.” Incidence rates in African countries 10–20 times higher than 2030 goal Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are heavily concentrated in low-and middle-incomee countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most developed countries already have a cervical cancer incidence of between 10-4 cases annually per 100 000 women – with 4/100 000 being the elimination threshold. But many countries in Africa have cervical cancer incidence of 60-70 or even eighty cases annually per 100 000 women, said Nathalie Broutet, of the University of Sydney, Australia, citing Malawi and Eswatini as examples. As a former WHO staff member, Broutet helped draft the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2020. To get on course for elimination “we need to reach the 2030 targets, which are 90% HPV vaccination coverage; 70% of women screened with a high performance, twice in a lifetime; and 90% of women detected with a cervical disease treated,” she said. In terms of vaccination, for instance, apart from the region of the Americas, which has almost reached 80% coverage, all other WHO regions remain far behind the 90% goal for 2030. “So, the work that we have to do to reach 90% is enormous,” said Broutet. Better adapted vaccines – the missing HPV 35 genotype Nathalie Broutet, University of Sydney aand former WHO cervical cancer specialist. However, along with more uptake of HPV vaccination, HPV vaccines need to be better adapted to the needs of girls and women in low- and middle–income populations. And recent research undertaken by CeHDI together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is pointing to a big gap in Africa. That is the lack of vaccine coverage for the HPV 35 genotype, which now a common subtype of the virus in Africa, in comparison to the rest of the world. “This is a genotype which is very common in African countries, which is responsible for around even more than 4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa,” said Broutet. “Yet this genotype is not included in the current HPV vaccine.” One brand-new study points to an even higher incidence, said Haileyesus Getahun, CEO of CeHDI, citing a new review of the “Burden of HPV 35 in African Cervical Pathologies” in the journal Medical Virology. That peer-reviewed study published this month, cites HPV35 prevalence of 19-30% in Mozambique, 22-26% in Kenya, 17% in South Africa and 11% in Zimbabwe and Tanzania among women with ICC lesions. In women with pre-cancerous lesions, rates of 20-26% were found in Botswana and Tanzania. In sharp contrast, studies from China, Canada, Sweden and Europe pointed to a prevalence of less than 1%. Globally, the prevalence among women with ICC lesions was only 2%. “Specifically, HPV35 has been more frequently associated with precancerous cervical lesions and accounts for a significant proportion of ICC [invasive cervical carcinoma] (4%–10%) in these populations, with a higher fraction than that observed in other regions,” concludes the authors from the University of Cape Town, South Africa; as well as medical research faculties in Tanzania, Botswana and Zimbabwe. HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer. Overcoming the key problems in service delivery For cervical cancer, school-based HPV vaccination delivery is critical. There are cited three key problems in service delivery, vaccination gaps, lack of access to low-cost HPV testing and related laboratory services; and lack of access to cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, which are out of reach in most rural clinics and in the public health systems of many urban centres. To overcome the challenges, global experts recommend the following: School-based vaccination – This is the first time a vaccine must be delivered to an adolescent population, leading to challenges with both disinformation as well as the need to put new systems in place. “We know in countries that use school- based delivery has been quite a success,” said Broutet. “Gender-neutral vaccination can improve the coverage and lift barriers that we see regarding the HPV vaccination of girls-only; and strong community engagement – communication needs to be in place. In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Shift from Pap smears to HPV testing – In high income countries with high rates of cervical cancer screening, the most used test remains the Pap smear – a cytology-based test. In low income countries BIA or bioimpedance screening, which uses electrical signals to detect abnormal cells, has been widely used as well due to its low–cost and rapid results. But WHO as well as many national health systems are now recommending a shift to HPV testing, widely regarded as more accurate and ultimately more cost-efficient. That involves testing specifically for the human papillomavirus genotypes that are the most common cause of cancer. “Even in countries that we think reach 70% coverage, there is a lot of work to be done to switch out the existing technology, which is basically cytology, and in low-income countries, BIA. Instead, all countries need to switch toward HPV testing,” says Broutet. “And we need also to ensure that innovation is available, and one of them is self-sampling, so self-collection and also urine samples. We need to ensure that all countries have access to this technology.” Self-screening and community-based treatment – Treatment immediately following screening is the third basic tool needed to reach elimination targets. Such treatment can remove pre-cancerous cells before they develop further. “Mobile screening clinics can be an option to increase coverage, task shifting to community health workers,” said Broutet. “This expands coverage. And finally, digital registry [of screening results]. We need to follow up and track women who have been screened to ensure those with a positive test have been treated.” Improving vaccine composition HPV 35 is one of five highly invasive genotypes not now covered by vaccines, responsible for an outsized proportion of cancers in Africa. Improving vaccine composition is also a critical mission, said Getahun. Together with IARC, CeHDI is supporting an even more thorough African and global review of the evidence on the HPV 35 genotype and its burden. “Our collaboration with IARC will help generate the evidence needed to inform the development of next-generation HPV vaccines that better reflect regional disease patterns, including the burden of HPV 35 in sub-Saharan Africa,” he observed. “Going forward we hope this will stimulate dialogue with the manufacturers, countries, WHO and global procurement partners such as Gavi and Unitaid to ensure that this genotype is included in the next generation of vaccines, particularly those deployed in Africa.” Currently, none of the main HPV vaccine manufacturers, which include the UK- and USA-based GSK and MSD(Merck), as well as the Serum Institute of India and two Chinese firms include HPV 35 in their vaccine formulations. However, a 14-valent vaccine by another leading Chinese pharma innovator, Sinocelltech, has a 14-valent vaccine SCT1000 in Phase 3 trials with some 18,000 women, which includes the HPV 35 genotype. “Especially in regions with high HIV prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the application of polyvalent HPV vaccines (including HPV 35) is essential, as people living with HIV are more prone to multiple HPV infections requiring broader protection,” state an October 2025 review by Chiara Paternostro and Elmar Joura, of the Medical University of Vienna. Gavi board: approved inclusion of improved vaccines once available HPV vaccine – Gavi has approved inclusion of improved formulations to protect against more genotypes once available. Asked by Health Policy Watch about the need and potential to update existing vaccines to include the HPV 35 genotype, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, said its board had in 2025 approved the inclusion of improved vaccines covering more virus genotypes in its portfolio as soon as they become available: “Current HPV vaccines are designed to protect against the large majority (70%) of cervical cancers. The importance of this evolving research is that we now have a better understanding of the disease burden of HPV-35 in countries across Africa, which Gavi supports – as well as how that burden is expected to increase over time as other types decrease due to improved vaccine coverage,” a Gavi spokesperson said. “While there are currently no licensed vaccines that provide protection against HPV‑35, the Gavi Board in December 2025 approved, based on WHO and SAGE guidance, an expansion of Gavi’s portfolio so that higher-valent vaccines can be made available to countries as and when they come available. We encourage our manufacturing partners to work with us in helping bring this about.” WHO pointed to a recent systematic review by WHO/IARC (Wei et al. 2024) confirming that HPV35 is part of the remaining known 10 HPV causal genotypes, it causes only about 5% of cases worldwide, “but with some notable regional variations, including a higher proportion (~4%) for HPV 35 in Africa than in other regions.” “Currently, HPV35 is not among the types covered in the two existing, licensed (highest valency) HPV9 vaccines that contain the same 7 oncogenic types (16,18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58),” a spokesperson said. “We are aware additional work is being done on HPV35 that may provide more information on this strain and its contribution to cervical cancer burden– in particular, in the African region. In future that may inform vaccine developers in their choice for additional HPV type to be included in ‘even higher valency’.” Rwanda: on track to beat 2050 global elimination target Two girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka, Rwanda, a country that is on track to reach the 2050 goal for cervical cancer elimination. But vaccination is not in itself an answer. It must be part of a multi-pronged approach. “Over the next 50 years, scaling up screening and treatment could avert up to 14.6 million deaths, three times more than vaccination alone,” noted Cabo Verde’s UN Ambassador in Geneva Clara Delgado and a member of the Unitaid Executive Board. Since 2019, Unitaid has introduced HPV testing, self-sampling methods and portable thermal ablation treatment devices (for removal of precancerous lesions) across approximately 50 low- and middle income countries, driving down costs significantly.” Bulk procurement has reduced HPV test prices by 40% and the costs of thermal ablation by 45% “making these lifesaving tools affordable where they are needed most.” But just as important are country models that work, she stressed, citing Rwanda, South Africa, Malawi and the Philippines as “champion” examples. “For example, in Rwanda with Unitaid’s partnership since 2019, a national screen and treat program now operates in over half of the country. Women in rural communities are being reached through HPV self-collection kits, a simple, dignified approach that brings services closer to home, breaking barriers of distance, stigma and cost. As a result of the partnership, Rwanda is on track to beat the 2030 elimination targets by three years, “proving that elimination is not just possible, but achievable.” Repeating the success of smallpox eradication “Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer by 2050,” said Ramsammy, “Today we have an opportunity to elevate cervical cancer elimination on the multilateral agenda as a matter of equity, gender justice and the right to health.” Said Getahun, “At a time when global solidarity and multilateralism are under strain, health diplomacy is more important than ever in strengthening North–South and South–South cooperation and advancing the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer.” Adds Broutet, “We have a generation to end cervical cancer, and we have the tools,” citing national elimination targets; sustainable financing; regional cooperation to decrease the price of the tools and investing in treatment infrastructure as key political levers. “The science exists, the roadmap exists, but the inequity persists. Political will determines the outcome.” Most important is the need to address gender inequities. “Each country of the world needs to understand, what are these drivers of inequity in their own country?” she said, citing the late WHO director Mahmoud Fathalla, who once said: “women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. They are dying because societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.” Image Credits: UNICEF, WHO , N. Broutet/WHO, ecancer.org, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, Broutet, Gavi, HPV World . US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Available Cervical Cancer Vaccines Fail to Cover the HPV 35 Genotype Common in Africa 26/03/2026 Elaine Ruth Fletcher “Cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity:” Ambassador Leslie Ramsammy, Guyana (center). Left, UN Ambassadors Clara Delgado and Antje Leenderste of Capo Verde and Germany. Right, CeHDI CEO Haileyesus Getahun and Colin Murdoch, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean Statees (OECS). The Human papillomavirus (HPV35), globally associated with only 2% of invasive cervical cancers (ICC), has a disproportionately higher prevalence in sub‐Saharan Africa, reaching rates of 22-30% in some countries among women with ICC lesions, according to a new study. Recently, a high-level panel called for redoubled efforts in HPV vaccination, screening and treatment to meet the WHO Global Strategy targets for 2030 – and eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 worldwide. Midway along the route toward the WHO 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination, some 340,000 women a year, mostly in low-income countries, are still dying from cervical cancer – due to the dearth of simple solutions like screening, treatment off pre-cancerous cells, and low HPV vaccination coverage for adolescent girls. Meanwhile, HPV 35—a genotype of the HPV virus that is steadily spreading throughout Africa—is not targeted by existing vaccine formulations. This highlights the urgent need to speed up research and development to create an updated vaccine. At the same time, success stories from a handful of developing countries such as Rwanda demonstrate that the 2030 targets for 90% HPV vaccine coverage, 70% screening and 90% treatment can be attained – when political will exists. Meeting those targets would put countries on track to meeting the global elimination goal of less than 4 cervical cancer cases annually per 100 000 women as early as 2050. Those were key messages emerging from a recent high-level seminar on a Cervical Cancer-Free Future, convened by the Center for Global Health Development and Inclusion (CeHDI) together with the UN in Geneva ambassadors of Barbados, Germany, Guyana and Malawi. “Although cervical cancer is both preventable and curable when detected early, it remains the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death among women worldwide,” said Guyana’s ambassador, Leslie Ramsammy. “In Guyana, for example, it is the number two cause of cancer deaths among women. For some countries, it’s the number one cause of cancer death among women each year.” About 600,000 women annually are diagnosed with cervical cancer, representing 6.5% of new cancer cases and 7.7% of cancer deaths. And 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. As such, “cervical cancer has become a mirror of global health inequity,” he added. The goal: global elimination of cervical cancer by 2050 Countries must reach the WHO 2030 targets for diagnosis and treatment in order to reach the goal of cervical cancer elimination by 2050. Most developed countries are on a trajectory to meet the WHO 2030 goals and moving on from there, to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health risk by 2050. However, developing countries are on a much longer trajectory. And at current rates of progress, most will only reach elimination in 2120, said Ramsammy. “Today’s High-Level dialog is a call to change the trajectory for elimination from 2120 to earlier… closer to 2050 when many European countries and North America would have achieved elimination.” Said Ramsammy, “The question is no longer whether cervical cancer can be eliminated, but when and whether the world will mobilize the political will and resources needed to ensure that no woman dies from a preventable disease. Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer.” Incidence rates in African countries 10–20 times higher than 2030 goal Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are heavily concentrated in low-and middle-incomee countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most developed countries already have a cervical cancer incidence of between 10-4 cases annually per 100 000 women – with 4/100 000 being the elimination threshold. But many countries in Africa have cervical cancer incidence of 60-70 or even eighty cases annually per 100 000 women, said Nathalie Broutet, of the University of Sydney, Australia, citing Malawi and Eswatini as examples. As a former WHO staff member, Broutet helped draft the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2020. To get on course for elimination “we need to reach the 2030 targets, which are 90% HPV vaccination coverage; 70% of women screened with a high performance, twice in a lifetime; and 90% of women detected with a cervical disease treated,” she said. In terms of vaccination, for instance, apart from the region of the Americas, which has almost reached 80% coverage, all other WHO regions remain far behind the 90% goal for 2030. “So, the work that we have to do to reach 90% is enormous,” said Broutet. Better adapted vaccines – the missing HPV 35 genotype Nathalie Broutet, University of Sydney aand former WHO cervical cancer specialist. However, along with more uptake of HPV vaccination, HPV vaccines need to be better adapted to the needs of girls and women in low- and middle–income populations. And recent research undertaken by CeHDI together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is pointing to a big gap in Africa. That is the lack of vaccine coverage for the HPV 35 genotype, which now a common subtype of the virus in Africa, in comparison to the rest of the world. “This is a genotype which is very common in African countries, which is responsible for around even more than 4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa,” said Broutet. “Yet this genotype is not included in the current HPV vaccine.” One brand-new study points to an even higher incidence, said Haileyesus Getahun, CEO of CeHDI, citing a new review of the “Burden of HPV 35 in African Cervical Pathologies” in the journal Medical Virology. That peer-reviewed study published this month, cites HPV35 prevalence of 19-30% in Mozambique, 22-26% in Kenya, 17% in South Africa and 11% in Zimbabwe and Tanzania among women with ICC lesions. In women with pre-cancerous lesions, rates of 20-26% were found in Botswana and Tanzania. In sharp contrast, studies from China, Canada, Sweden and Europe pointed to a prevalence of less than 1%. Globally, the prevalence among women with ICC lesions was only 2%. “Specifically, HPV35 has been more frequently associated with precancerous cervical lesions and accounts for a significant proportion of ICC [invasive cervical carcinoma] (4%–10%) in these populations, with a higher fraction than that observed in other regions,” concludes the authors from the University of Cape Town, South Africa; as well as medical research faculties in Tanzania, Botswana and Zimbabwe. HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines and percentage contribution in invasive cervical cancer. Overcoming the key problems in service delivery For cervical cancer, school-based HPV vaccination delivery is critical. There are cited three key problems in service delivery, vaccination gaps, lack of access to low-cost HPV testing and related laboratory services; and lack of access to cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, which are out of reach in most rural clinics and in the public health systems of many urban centres. To overcome the challenges, global experts recommend the following: School-based vaccination – This is the first time a vaccine must be delivered to an adolescent population, leading to challenges with both disinformation as well as the need to put new systems in place. “We know in countries that use school- based delivery has been quite a success,” said Broutet. “Gender-neutral vaccination can improve the coverage and lift barriers that we see regarding the HPV vaccination of girls-only; and strong community engagement – communication needs to be in place. In Dwazark Community, Freetown, Sierra Leone, students at St. Augustine School receive the HPV vaccine to protect against cervical cancer. Shift from Pap smears to HPV testing – In high income countries with high rates of cervical cancer screening, the most used test remains the Pap smear – a cytology-based test. In low income countries BIA or bioimpedance screening, which uses electrical signals to detect abnormal cells, has been widely used as well due to its low–cost and rapid results. But WHO as well as many national health systems are now recommending a shift to HPV testing, widely regarded as more accurate and ultimately more cost-efficient. That involves testing specifically for the human papillomavirus genotypes that are the most common cause of cancer. “Even in countries that we think reach 70% coverage, there is a lot of work to be done to switch out the existing technology, which is basically cytology, and in low-income countries, BIA. Instead, all countries need to switch toward HPV testing,” says Broutet. “And we need also to ensure that innovation is available, and one of them is self-sampling, so self-collection and also urine samples. We need to ensure that all countries have access to this technology.” Self-screening and community-based treatment – Treatment immediately following screening is the third basic tool needed to reach elimination targets. Such treatment can remove pre-cancerous cells before they develop further. “Mobile screening clinics can be an option to increase coverage, task shifting to community health workers,” said Broutet. “This expands coverage. And finally, digital registry [of screening results]. We need to follow up and track women who have been screened to ensure those with a positive test have been treated.” Improving vaccine composition HPV 35 is one of five highly invasive genotypes not now covered by vaccines, responsible for an outsized proportion of cancers in Africa. Improving vaccine composition is also a critical mission, said Getahun. Together with IARC, CeHDI is supporting an even more thorough African and global review of the evidence on the HPV 35 genotype and its burden. “Our collaboration with IARC will help generate the evidence needed to inform the development of next-generation HPV vaccines that better reflect regional disease patterns, including the burden of HPV 35 in sub-Saharan Africa,” he observed. “Going forward we hope this will stimulate dialogue with the manufacturers, countries, WHO and global procurement partners such as Gavi and Unitaid to ensure that this genotype is included in the next generation of vaccines, particularly those deployed in Africa.” Currently, none of the main HPV vaccine manufacturers, which include the UK- and USA-based GSK and MSD(Merck), as well as the Serum Institute of India and two Chinese firms include HPV 35 in their vaccine formulations. However, a 14-valent vaccine by another leading Chinese pharma innovator, Sinocelltech, has a 14-valent vaccine SCT1000 in Phase 3 trials with some 18,000 women, which includes the HPV 35 genotype. “Especially in regions with high HIV prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the application of polyvalent HPV vaccines (including HPV 35) is essential, as people living with HIV are more prone to multiple HPV infections requiring broader protection,” state an October 2025 review by Chiara Paternostro and Elmar Joura, of the Medical University of Vienna. Gavi board: approved inclusion of improved vaccines once available HPV vaccine – Gavi has approved inclusion of improved formulations to protect against more genotypes once available. Asked by Health Policy Watch about the need and potential to update existing vaccines to include the HPV 35 genotype, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, said its board had in 2025 approved the inclusion of improved vaccines covering more virus genotypes in its portfolio as soon as they become available: “Current HPV vaccines are designed to protect against the large majority (70%) of cervical cancers. The importance of this evolving research is that we now have a better understanding of the disease burden of HPV-35 in countries across Africa, which Gavi supports – as well as how that burden is expected to increase over time as other types decrease due to improved vaccine coverage,” a Gavi spokesperson said. “While there are currently no licensed vaccines that provide protection against HPV‑35, the Gavi Board in December 2025 approved, based on WHO and SAGE guidance, an expansion of Gavi’s portfolio so that higher-valent vaccines can be made available to countries as and when they come available. We encourage our manufacturing partners to work with us in helping bring this about.” WHO pointed to a recent systematic review by WHO/IARC (Wei et al. 2024) confirming that HPV35 is part of the remaining known 10 HPV causal genotypes, it causes only about 5% of cases worldwide, “but with some notable regional variations, including a higher proportion (~4%) for HPV 35 in Africa than in other regions.” “Currently, HPV35 is not among the types covered in the two existing, licensed (highest valency) HPV9 vaccines that contain the same 7 oncogenic types (16,18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58),” a spokesperson said. “We are aware additional work is being done on HPV35 that may provide more information on this strain and its contribution to cervical cancer burden– in particular, in the African region. In future that may inform vaccine developers in their choice for additional HPV type to be included in ‘even higher valency’.” Rwanda: on track to beat 2050 global elimination target Two girls sit together after receiving their HPV vaccinations at their primary school in Masaka, Rwanda, a country that is on track to reach the 2050 goal for cervical cancer elimination. But vaccination is not in itself an answer. It must be part of a multi-pronged approach. “Over the next 50 years, scaling up screening and treatment could avert up to 14.6 million deaths, three times more than vaccination alone,” noted Cabo Verde’s UN Ambassador in Geneva Clara Delgado and a member of the Unitaid Executive Board. Since 2019, Unitaid has introduced HPV testing, self-sampling methods and portable thermal ablation treatment devices (for removal of precancerous lesions) across approximately 50 low- and middle income countries, driving down costs significantly.” Bulk procurement has reduced HPV test prices by 40% and the costs of thermal ablation by 45% “making these lifesaving tools affordable where they are needed most.” But just as important are country models that work, she stressed, citing Rwanda, South Africa, Malawi and the Philippines as “champion” examples. “For example, in Rwanda with Unitaid’s partnership since 2019, a national screen and treat program now operates in over half of the country. Women in rural communities are being reached through HPV self-collection kits, a simple, dignified approach that brings services closer to home, breaking barriers of distance, stigma and cost. As a result of the partnership, Rwanda is on track to beat the 2030 elimination targets by three years, “proving that elimination is not just possible, but achievable.” Repeating the success of smallpox eradication “Just as international collaboration led to the eradication of smallpox, the global community can work together to end cervical cancer by 2050,” said Ramsammy, “Today we have an opportunity to elevate cervical cancer elimination on the multilateral agenda as a matter of equity, gender justice and the right to health.” Said Getahun, “At a time when global solidarity and multilateralism are under strain, health diplomacy is more important than ever in strengthening North–South and South–South cooperation and advancing the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer.” Adds Broutet, “We have a generation to end cervical cancer, and we have the tools,” citing national elimination targets; sustainable financing; regional cooperation to decrease the price of the tools and investing in treatment infrastructure as key political levers. “The science exists, the roadmap exists, but the inequity persists. Political will determines the outcome.” Most important is the need to address gender inequities. “Each country of the world needs to understand, what are these drivers of inequity in their own country?” she said, citing the late WHO director Mahmoud Fathalla, who once said: “women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. They are dying because societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.” Image Credits: UNICEF, WHO , N. Broutet/WHO, ecancer.org, Murahwa et al, Reviews in Medical Virology, 33 March 2026, Broutet, Gavi, HPV World . US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
US Withdrawal of Global Health Funding is ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan US President Donald Trump shocked partners when he announced an immediate freezing of all international health aid shortly after assuming power in January 2025. The rapid withdrawal of international health aid by the United States (US) constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), according to Professor Matthew Herder and colleagues writing in the BMJ this week. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations, a PHEIC is “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. “Multiple estimates predict reduced US funding will lead to millions of deaths by 2030,” argue Herder, from the Dalhousie University’s school of law in Canada, Professor Roojin Habibi from Ottawa University, Fatima Hassan, director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, and Andrew Hill, visiting research fellow at the University of Liverpool in the UK. The Trump administration’s funding freeze on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), resulted in “the sudden closure of treatment services for thousands of people with HIV/AIDS”, while the stop-work orders imposed on the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “immediately reduced HIV testing and treatment”. If this aid is not resumed, UNAIDS estimates that there could be six million HIV-related deaths – a 10-fold increase on 2023 mortality – and nine million new HIV infections by 2030. Meanwhile, cuts in funding for malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are expected to “risk millions more deaths in the coming years”, they argue. “If the Trump administration follows through on its threat to halt funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, alter the US childhood vaccination schedule, and fundamentally change its approach to pandemic preparedness as part of its America First global health strategy, vaccine preventable diseases and deaths are likely to resurge, both in the US and abroad,” they note. Meanwhile, ceasing US funding for United Nations agencies, including UN Women and the UN Population Fund, “threatens to end services that support sexual rights and reproductive health in more than 150 countries.” Mobilise resources In response, they want the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a PHEIC in order to galvanise resources to address the US actions. They argue that the US actions amount to an “extraordinary event” within the definition of the IHR, and that an “event” is not limited to the “manifestation of disease” but extends to any “occurrence that creates a potential for disease.” “The main interpretive issue in this case is whether the political actions of the US amount to a public health risk through the ‘international spread of disease’,” they acknowledge. While the “spread of disease” hasn’t fully materialised yet, “we are in a state of anticipation that numerous outbreaks of infectious diseases will occur as treatment and public health programmes reliant on US funding shut down around the globe”. They argue that, while a PHEIC “has never been declared because of the political actions of a single country, risk is the paramount consideration, and the US’s recent decisions have greatly amplified the risk of multiple international outbreaks of disease”. However, should the WHO declare a PHEIC, this can help to “mobilise collaboration, assistance, and financing across member states” and also enable countries to issue “compulsory licences, overriding the patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, to improve access to essential medicines to treat HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases.” Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Meta Liable for Harming Kids; Soda and Alcohol Companies ‘Flood’ Social Media 26/03/2026 Kerry Cullinan Social media giants are liable for harming young users, according to two landmark court rulings in the United States this week that order Meta and YouTube to pay millions in damages. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found that Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube were liable for creating addictive products that had led to a young user developing depression and anxiety. The court ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube $1.8 million in compensation to the woman identified only as KGM, now aged 20. KGM’s lawyers accused the companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes and online gambling, using features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations. On Monday, a New Mexico jury found that Meta had misled its social media users into thinking its platforms were safe, yet sexual predators were able to contact and exploit children. It ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for violating state consumer protection laws in the case, which was brought by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez told The Guardian after the ruling. A two-year Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become “marketplaces for child sex trafficking” was cited several times in the complaint. Big Soda, alcohol companies ‘flood’ social media Vital Strategies accuses Coca-Cola of “sportswashing” their sugary drinks via sponsorships. Meanwhile, soda and alcohol companies are flooding social media platforms with a “constant stream of content” that evades outdated advertising regulations, according to Vital Strategies, a global public health organisation. The consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol is linked to several noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. By embedding their brands in “sports highlights, influencer content and viral moments” rather than traditional advertising, these industries are generating billions of impressions, according to Vital. Using its digital media monitoring tool, Canary, Vital’s researchers tracked how Coca-Cola’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup and alcohol companies’ use of festivals, cultural events and celebrities in Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa “integrated brand promotion into people’s everyday online experiences”. “Companies are using culture, entertainment and social media to make harmful products – like alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks – seem normal and unavoidable,” said Sandra Mullin, senior vice president at Vital. “This undermines critically important policies to reduce consumption, like curbing marketing to kids and taxing these products. Governments cannot rely on social media to self-regulate: We need to implement proven policies that protect health.” Vital Strategies called on governments to implement comprehensive marketing policies that span both digital and physical environments, particularly youth spaces where exposure is highest. It also called on governments to ban harmful industries from sponsoring sports events, and increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages to reduce consumption. “One moment in a stadium can become millions of online impressions,” said Vital vice president Nandita Murukutla and Canary lead. “That’s how today’s marketing machines work: amplifying exposure across digital platforms where young people are constantly engaged. This isn’t passive advertising; it shapes behaviour. Governments must respond with urgency.” Image Credits: Unsplash, Vital Strategies. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts