Unprecedented reductions in international aid have served as a powerful catalyst for long-overdue global health reform, according to a comprehensive new report published by the Wellcome Trust on Wednesday. The extensive synthesis of five regional dialogues involving 114 countries reveals that sweeping financial pullbacks from traditional funders are forcing a fundamental restructuring of international medical cooperation.

“What happens next depends on our willingness to move forwards together – and to seize this moment to build a healthier future for all,” said John-Arne Røttingen, chief executive officer of the Wellcome Trust, upon the report’s release in March 2026.

He emphasised that if stakeholders navigate these structural shifts correctly, history will view this year as the dawn of a positive new era for international care.

The Wellcome analysis underscores that the prevailing aid-centric model is no longer viable, as major traditional benefactors drastically scale back their commitments. Development assistance for the medical sector is projected to plummet by 60% by 2030, returning to levels last seen in 2009, a recent European Union (EU) and Like-Minded Donors’ Reflection Process revealed.

These financial shortfalls severely threaten to unravel decades of progress against infectious diseases and maternal mortality. The EU and other donors acknowledged this contested multilateralism, noting that external assistance must now be treated as temporary and catalytic rather than perpetual.

The current architecture is widely criticised as fragmented, overly centralised, and structurally incapable of addressing the shifting burden of non-communicable diseases. Systemic inefficiencies and deep power imbalances have left low- and middle-income countries heavily reliant on volatile external financing, thereby eroding their domestic sovereignty.

In response, a powerful consensus is emerging that authentic global health reform must empower low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and regional coalitions to govern their own agendas.

To navigate this outlook, the report outlines three critical pillars for structural reform: decentralising global health governance, overhauling international financing, and securing regional sovereignty over data and medical manufacturing.

Driving global health reform through regional power

As traditional Western funding wanes in a multipolar world, geopolitical analysts note that middle powers are actively navigating this rupture by seeking innovative funding mechanisms and stronger partnerships with multilateral development banks.

The urgent necessity for structural change has propelled regional organisations, such as the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), firmly into the spotlight. These bodies are increasingly viewed as the rightful anchors for policy setting, technical cooperation, and the pooled procurement of essential medicines.

To safeguard digital independence, stakeholders are increasingly advocating for unified digital public infrastructures, such as the proposed African Health Data and Governance Framework. This framework would ensure that African health data is stored, managed and used within the continent to actively protect national sovereignty. By maintaining local control, this approach empowers African nations to monetise their own data through value addition, such as for clinical trials, rather than relying on external systems.

In Latin America and the Caribbean, stakeholders have similarly proposed a Health Catalytic Platform (LAC-HCP) to coordinate investments in regional public goods, such as AI-powered health data architectures and shared technology assessments.

Experts assert that meaningful global health reform must move away from a fragmented, disease-specific approach towards integrated primary care systems driven by local governments. In this new approach, global health initiatives should step back from being the centre of gravity and instead act as facilitators that support and accelerate country-driven goals.

The international architecture is being actively pressed to become leaner, with the World Health Organization (WHO) focusing strictly on its core mandate of normative guidance. Concurrently, operational control and implementation should be increasingly ceded to capable regional and national actors.

Sovereign debt crisis threatens global health reform

The success of global health reform is severely threatened by the macroeconomic reality that nearly 60% of countries eligible for International Development Association (IDA) support currently face debt distress. Policy experts warn that without alleviating these unsustainable debt burdens, LMICs will lack the fiscal capacity required to transition away from donor dependence.

To circumvent these debt-trap dynamics and the precipitous decline in external assistance, proponents are shifting their focus toward entirely new financing streams that do not rely on traditional lending. These include global solidarity levies, regional solidarity funds and expanded domestic taxation to finance sustainable primary care.

​​Global Health Infrastructure is Changing. Why Getting it Right Matters

Countries are already pushing ahead, with France, Kenya and Barbados leading a coalition to invest proceeds from aviation sector taxes into resilient health investments and fair transitions. At the national level, the Democratic Republic of Congo recently implemented a 2% import tax to generate health revenues, while Zambia increased its health budget allocation to 13%.

In Latin America and the Caribbean, stakeholders have similarly put forward a Regional Health Solidarity Fund to pool resources and coordinate regional health investments. Additionally, international coalitions are increasingly proposing structural economic interventions, including a global hub for debt swaps for development hosted at the World Bank.

Furthermore, nine major financial institutions and countries have formed an alliance to promote the inclusion of debt pause clauses in official lending.

While proponents see these as vital tools, critics argue that these approaches fail to address the scale of the crisis and often replace traditional aid with conditional financial oversight. Instead, many advocate for unconditional debt cancellation to provide immediate liquidity, echoing long-standing historical demands.

“Unless the issue of who owns the money is changed, we are stuck,” stated an African government official during the consultations for the EU and Like-Minded Donors’ Reflection Process.

Empowering civil society and regional cooperation

Civil society organisations have also demanded a radical redistribution of influence, arguing that community voices remain marginalised in high-level decision-making forums. The Wellcome report highlights that equitable global health reform demands formal participation mechanisms over informal, tokenistic arrangements.

Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic vividly exposed the fragility of highly concentrated production systems, prompting urgent calls for distributed manufacturing capabilities. Regional dialogues have confirmed that shaping health markets through pooled purchasing and local production is critical to guaranteeing equitable access to life-saving commodities.

“Africa is saying: we don’t just want vaccines delivered to us, we want the capacity to produce them ourselves… The world must adjust to this new reality,” an Africa Dialogue participant stated during the regional consultations published in the report.

The current financial contraction offers an opportunity to dismantle outdated donor structures and forge a highly resilient, decentralised network that respects country ownership, the report underscores.

To translate this perspective into tangible global health reform, the Wellcome Trust will host a major global convening in April 2026, gathering stakeholders from five global regions to explore areas of emerging consensus and establish concrete pathways for action. The synthesis report and the regional priorities it highlights are intended to support and guide current reform efforts at both the global and regional levels.

The organisation will remain engaged in these varied dialogues because their overarching goal is “to foster coherence and promote holistic thinking and action,” Fabian Moser, Policy Advisor at Wellcome and one of the authors of the paper, explained in a query by Health Policy Watch.

Image Credits: Nadia Marini/MSF , Hera/EU, Wellcome Trust, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW.