1000th Ebola Survivor Returns Home As Operational & Security Challenges Hinder Response 04/10/2019 Grace Ren The 1000th Ebola survivor of the current outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has just celebrated her return home. “Today, amid our unrelenting work to end this tenth outbreak of Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, we celebrate a bright spot, which is actually 1000 bright spots – each person who has survived an Ebola infection,” said Dr. Matshidiso Moeti, regional director of the World Health Organization’s African Regional Office (WHO AFRO) in a statement. Dr. Matshidiso Moeti visits the DRC during the Ebola outbreak As of 1 October, a total of 3197 Ebola cases were reported, including 3083 confirmed and 114 probable cases, of which two thirds have died from the disease. However, of the 1555 cases that were admitted to treatment centers, 1000 have survived. Ebola survivors have been key community advocates in this response, returning to their communities after being cured to encourage other people to seek care and contacts to get vaccinated. Despite the optimism, Moeti notes, “..we have more to learn and more to do…We must work harder to build trust and to spread the message: surviving Ebola is possible, and we are here to make that happen.” The recent decline in Ebola cases over the past three weeks should be interpreted with caution, as operational and security challenges in Mandima and Mambasa health zones, where 55% of the new cases reported in the last week are coming from, continue to cause delays in detecting and responding to new cases. 20 new confirmed cases of Ebola from North Kivu and Ituri provinces were reported from September 25 to October 1, versus 29 from September 17 – 24 and 57 in the week prior according to the latest WHO outbreak news. In Mambasa, where 162 contacts have been lost to follow-up, delays in involving the community and civil society response have led to community mistrust – now WHO is working with local and civil society partners in the area to engage women’s groups and enhance community-based surveillance. In Mandima health zone, where 169 contacts have been lost to follow-up, armed conflict and low EVD awareness have led to tension between Ebola response teams and local communities and difficulties investigating community deaths, thus the true number of cases is likely underreported. It has been 17 days since a major security incident in the Lwemba area in Mandima health zone forced Ebola teams to temporarily suspend activities, which greatly limited contact tracing efforts and response activities. The outbreak hotspots have shifted from high density, urban settings to more rural, less densely populated areas, with fewer new cases coming from Butembo, Katwa, and Beni. The shift in outbreak hotspots to more rural areas may signal changes transmission dynamics, with more community-based transmission and less transmission in healthcare facilities. However, new accessibility and logistical challenges to reach affected villages may come up, especially as the rainy season approaches. WHO has received US$61 million to fund the response through December 2019, leaving a predicted funding shortfall of approximately US$60-80 million as of October 2nd. Additional funds have been committed or pledged, but WHO continues to appeal to donors to provide generous support. Image Credits: WHO AFRO. Europe Charts Way Forward For Digital Health Solutions 03/10/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Bad Hofgastein, Austria – Whether its work or leisure, Europeans are moving more and more between different countries on the continent – but their health records generally lag far behind. And this can create big barriers to the treatment of chronic health conditions, not to mention effective diagnosis and treatment in emergencies, said members of a panel on digital health Thursday at the European Health Forum (Gastein). Until just recently, even filling a prescription across borders was challenging, said Clemens Martin Auer, EHFG President and Special Envoy for Health for Austria’s Federal Ministry for Labour, Social Affairs, Health and Consumer Protection. Marco Marsella “We need data that can travel from one country to another seamlessly,” said Marco Marsella, head of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (DG Connect). Finland and Estonia took one small step in that direction earlier this year by agreeing to a system of e-prescription exchanges, said Auer, and that model is now being followed by some 21 other countries. But Auer said it will still take time for real transformation to occur. On the plus side, the European Commission in 2019 issued a set of clear recommendations for harmonized standards that would ease the flow of e-health data between countries, while also protecting people’s privacy. But countries still need to formally adopt the new EU guidelines to unlock the electronic gates. And once standards are formally in place, health care providers across the region will need to start updating and adapting their own electronic records systems– a process that would take considerable time considering the large and fragmented health care infrastructure that exists. Fragmentation a Hallmark of Health Sector Services “We should stop promising heaven on earth, when it comes to the health sector, there is no other sector that is as fragmented,” declared Auer. In Austria alone, there are 10,000 outpatient medical clinics, 130 hospitals, and 1200 pharmacies, as well as facilities such as nursing homes, he noted in a follow-up interview. ”They all have totally different digital equipment operating. So this is a barrier; we need to invest in a new generation of digital infrastructure.” Clemens Martin Auer Paradoxically, digital transformation could be more expensive for more affluent developed countries, which began investing in electronic patient information systems ten or 20 years ago. “When these systems were instituted, the purposes were totally different. It was not about sharing data. It was about optimizing internal processes,” Auer observed. “But we have to speed up. We don’t want the Googles and Amazons to take over the field of patient data sharing – although I don’t think they would succeed.” The first wave of data sharing for e-prescriptions took place under the European Framework of CEF – Connecting European Facilities, Auer said. The first countries were Finland and Estonia, now 21 member states are part of this first wave of cross border sharing of prescriptions and patient summaries, which started only in the spring, although countries are not yet sharing lab results or imaging. “The next step would be that the European Commission as well as its member states will agree to only fund infrastructures that create an interoperable eco-space. So if a hospital in Stuttgart procures a new hospital information system, it will also be able to communicate with Paris or Lyon. “The standards exist. One is the European Commission recommendation for electronic health record exchange formats. The others are guidelines agreed to by European Union member states on infrastructure requirements. Now, we have to politically take up these standards. And then we will see an acceleration of services. This is one of the last missing links. And once these are adopted, we will see an acceleration of services.” As for consumer concerns about data protection and data security of health records, Auer said that he is convinced that European data and privacy laws are robust enough to reassure patients that sensitive health information will not accidentally fall into the hands of third parties such as potential employers or creditors. “There is a huge political consensus among the people who are responsible for the health care system that for the sake of the continuity of care, of processes and outcomes, we have to share data. And we also have sound regulation when it comes to data protection and data security; in general as a European region, on a policy level, we did our homework.” Digitalization with a ‘Human Touch’ Another critical aspect of the digital revolution in health is ensuring that new e-health applications are serving patients and health care workers needs, rather than introducing new apps or gadgets that could be difficult for some patients to manage. “Whenever anyone thinks about digital, they think about an app, but digital is about all sorts of settings that may not be patient care, but support the patient care,” pointed out Indra Joshi, Digital Health & AI Clinical Lead of the National Health Service (NHS) England. “Digitalization is so driven by technicians sometimes that we lose the main point of why we are doing this in the healthcare sector,” added Auer. “And the healthcare sector needs this to improve the quality of health care.” The needs are endless. They range from digital solutions that can provide for more seamless continuity of care; to technologies that free doctors and nurses from mundane tasks; as well as methods to facilitate the aggregation of big data for research. “Digitalization has the potential to increase the outcomes and the quality of processes,” said Auer, “But we need to think more about what does a doctor or nurse really need to get rid of the more routine work, and to free up health care professionals to provide more personalized treatment.” As Chief Innovation Officer at one of Israel’s largest health funds, Clalit, Ran Balicer spends considerable time thinking about how such innovations can be put into the service of more people-centred health systems. “There is a fear that digital transformation and Artificial Intelligence (AI) will reduce the human touch,” Balicer said. “This could not be further from the truth. In their daily work, physicians are doing too many repetitive tasks that do not require their unique skills. “AI will allow doctors and nurses to go back to their real purpose. Digital transformation would offer us an opportunity to move away from the tyranny of reactive medicine and move towards proactive and preventive care,” he stressed. “Assisted by data and AI, we can locate those patients in need of care before they actually become symptomatic,” he added. “AI will also allow us to move from ‘intuitive’ medicine to more field-safe mechanisms [for diagnosis and treatment]. Today 30% of care is wasted and human error is the third cause of death.” “Overall, I think that this will allow us to have more of the human touch.” (left-right) Marco Marsella; Ran Balicer; Clemens Martin Auer; Indra Joshi Image Credits: NHS England, European Health Forum Gastein, European Health Forum Gastein, European Health Forum Gastein. Health In The ‘Economy Of Well-Being’ 03/10/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Bad Hofgastein, Austria – Promoting an “economy of well-being” can drive European development agendas more sustainably, as well as making health systems more human-centered and responsive to client’s needs, said Finland’s Vice Minister of Social Affairs and Health in a keynote address Thursday at the European Health Forum (Gastein). The three-day conference, which began Wednesday, has brought together some 600 health policymakers, researchers and practitioners from around Europe to explore challenges, trends and directions for the region’s health systems under the theme “A Healthy Dose of Disruption.” “The economy of well-being emphasizes the importance of placing individuals at the center of economic measures, and economic growth also improves people’s well-being,” said Eila Makipaa, the Finnish Vice Minister, speaking at a session devoted to the well-being theme. She noted that Finland has made the concept a cornerstone of its European Union presidency term, viewing it as a framework that can advance disparate issues from climate action to democracy. “The role of well-being is crucial in the context of human rights and security; the economy of well-being is part of the Finnish presidency programme, where we also see how well-being policies can boost productivity, generate economic growth and social stability, and ensure that no one is left behind in our rapidly changing world.” Social inclusion is not only a positive human value, it is good for the economy, added Josep Figueras, director of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, noting that treatment of patients at advanced disease stages or reintegration of people who are unemployed are all more costly undertakings than preventive measures taken proactively. “Well-being itself… is a way to bring the diverse sectors of health, social protection, gender, environment together under one umbrella,” he said. Some countries like New Zealand and France, as well as regions such as Wales in the United Kingdom, are already using well-being measures to evaluate the performance of government in different public policy arenas, he observed. But most European countries are “still struggling” with effective ways of monitoring and measuring progress in an economy built around ‘well-being.’ “We want to measure things differently, but how do we put that into practice within European policies and strategies?” he asked. Well-Being In An Ageing World Creating an economy of well-being in ageing societies is a key element of the challenge for Europe as well as other developed countries, said Esko Aho. Aho, in 1991 became Finland’s youngest prime minister ever taking office at the age of 36. Today, at age 65, he continues to work as CEO of a private sector firm and he doesn’t envision retiring anytime soon. ”Silver is the next green,” said Aho. Aho said that economies need to become more inclusive of older people – or else suffer the consequences of having too few active workers to support the health and social welfare benefits of people across the life cycle. However, health and economic leaders have been slow in coming to grips with the new demographic realities facing Europe as well as other developed economies. “There is a common view that older citizens are less productive,” observed Aho. “That is why they are kicked out first when you have to reduce your work force.” Recent research in the automobile industry contradicts that perception. It has shown that older employees’ competencies are equivalent to their younger counterparts – because older employees’ experience levels compensate for shortcomings in other areas. Esko Aho addresses the audience. “There are people who have the capacity to keep working until 80, but technically are retired. We have these standardized solutions, which we are afraid to change, we are afraid to move to more personalized solutions,” he said. “The 100-year life is totally different than 65 year life when Bismarck created the pension system,” he added, referring to the German chancellor, Otto Von Bismarck, who in 1883 created the first mandatory retirement and pension system in a move to counteract growing Marxist influence. Older workers also suffer from other forms of powerful but subtle discrimination which cause them to fall behind, added Jonathan Cylus, an economist and the London Hub Coordinator for the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. For instance, older people are less likely to be offered training opportunities than their younger counterparts – and that can cause them to fall behind their peers in performance, . “We need to have a more equitable approach to ensure that older people are able to work, and that they have the same opportunities,” he said, noting that there are 100 million people over the age of 65 in Europe and while incomes often decline after retirement, consumption needs remain about the same, creating economic stress. At the same time, he said one-size-fits all approaches need to be rejected. “The knee jerk reaction is to raise pension ages and that can also cause stress among people who didn’t expect this,” he said. “The economy of well-being is about more personalisation and more flexible policy-making.” Image Credits: David Rowe, European Health Forum Gastein. Sweden Steps Up Fight Against Epidemics With Strong Pledge to Global Fund 03/10/2019 Editorial team Sweden pledged to increase its support to the Global Fund by 14%, committing some SEK 2.85 billion (US $290 million) over the next three years, one of the latest in a line of donors to step to the call of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment Conference, coming up next week on October 9-10 in Lyon. The pledge was announced Thursday by Sweden’s Minister for International Development Cooperation, Peter Eriksson. “In recent years, we have seen a tougher climate and dwindling interest in women’s rights, and particularly sexual and reproductive rights. For this reason, Sweden’s contribution to the Global Fund is particularly important,” said Eriksson in a Global Fund press release. “Through this increased contribution, Sweden will remain a strong donor to global action for health. And with this, we will also have increased expectations and demands that the Global Fund will deliver in Sweden’s priority areas, including preventive efforts, equitable health, human rights and sexual and reproductive health and rights.” Peter Sands, Executive Director of the Global Fund, commended Sweden’s commitment saying: “Sweden’s investments in global health have contributed immensely in the fight against HIV, TB and malaria and in building strong health systems.” The Swedish announcement follows recent pledges by Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg to give NOK2.02 billion to the Sixth Replenishment, and Spain’s commitment for EUR100 million Euros. Five private sector partners announced new pledges for the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment during the World Economic Forum on Africa on September 4-6 in Cape Town. Natalie Portman introduces Peter Sands and Erna Solberg at the Global Citizens Festival 2019 Meanwhile activity in the lead up to the conference has intensified with high-powered celebrities such as, Annie Lennox, Diane Kruger, Natalie Portman and Penélope Cruz launching a petition on change.org in an open letter addressed to today’s 7-year-olds, calling on the world to commit to end AIDS, TB and malaria by 2030 – when today’s children become adults. Portman also appeared live on stage calling on the world to step up the fight and support the Global Fund at the annual Global Citizen concert in New York on September 28. The most recent Global Fund Results Report 2019 credits the partnership with saving 32 million lives from the three leading diseases that it is pledged to combat – HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria – since its inception in 2002. The Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon, France on October 9-10 2019, with the goal to raise US $14 billion for the fund’s next three-year cycle. At the United Nations General Assembly in New York last week, the Global Fund also joined 11 other major UN and international health agencies to launch a joint action plan, Stronger Collaboration, Better Health: Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All, to better support countries to accelerate progress towards the health-related Sustainable Development Goals. This followed the landmark commitment by UN member states to scale up efforts to achieve universal health coverage by 2030. Image Credits: Global Citizen. The Medicines Patent Pool Publishes Intellectual Property Status Of 18 Drugs Added To WHO Essential Medicines List 03/10/2019 Press release [The Medicines Patent Pool] Geneva (2 October 2019) — The Medicines Patent Pool today announced the first of a two-step update of its database MedsPaL to include additional patented small molecule medicines following the publication of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s updated Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) in July. Launched in 2016, MedsPaL is a free resource on the intellectual property status of patented medicines included in the WHO EML for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Initially covering selected HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis medicines in LMICs, MedsPaL expanded to all patented treatments on the EML in 2017. “We are passionate in our belief that public health stakeholders must have simplified access to accurate patent information on essential medicines in order to make informed decisions when the time comes to procure and supply those important drugs to the people who need them,” said Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool. “MedsPaL now provides patent and licensing data covering 96 priority medicines in more than 130 low- and middle-income countries and includes over 8,000 national patents and patent applications.” This update includes data on patents for medicines to treat lung cancer, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nausea, post-partum haemorrhage, hypertension and for three antibiotics, namely abiraterone, afatinib, apixaban, aprepitant, bortezomib, carbetocin (heat-stable formulation), ceftazidime+avibactam, dabigatran, edoxaban, erlotinib, gefitinib, lenalinomide, meropenem+vaborbactam, plazomicin, rivaroxaban, telmisartan+amlodipine, telmisartan+hydrochlorothiazide and tiotropium. For some of these medicines, key patents have expired, but a number of relevant secondary patents remain in force in some LMICs. Information on patented biologics will be made available in a second update before the end of the year. “It is fundamental that countries willing to provide greater access to essential medicines can refer to a reliable up-to-date database like MedsPaL to check the patent status of the medicines they want to procure,” said Nicola Magrini, Secretary of the WHO Essential Medicines List. “Access to medicines is certainly an important pillar of Universal Health Coverage and MedsPaL supports its efficient implementation at country level.” The MPP regularly updates the patent and licensing status data included in MedsPaL, including through data collected from national and regional patent offices from around the world. The MPP has signed collaborative agreements with the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO), the European Patent Office (EPO), Argentina’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Brazil’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Chile’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI), Dominican Republic’s National Office of Industrial Property (ONAPI), Ecuador’s National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI), the Egyptian Patent Office (EGPO), El Salvador’s National Registry Center (CNR), Peru’s National Institute for the Defense of Free Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI), South Africa’s Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC), and Uruguay’s National Directorate of Industrial Property (DNPI). About the Medicines Patent Pool The Medicines Patent Pool is a United Nations-backed public health organisation working to increase access to, and facilitate the development of, life-saving medicines for low- and middle-income countries. Through its innovative business model, the MPP partners with civil society, governments, international organisations, industry, patient groups and other stakeholders, to prioritise and licence needed medicines and pool intellectual property to encourage generic manufacture and the development of new formulations. To date, the MPP has signed agreements with nine patent holders for thirteen HIV antiretrovirals, one HIV technology platform, three hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals and a tuberculosis treatment. The MPP was founded by Unitaid, which serves as sole funder for the MPP’s activities in HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis. Funding provided by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) for MPP’s feasibility study on the potential expansion of its licensing activities into patented essential medicines made the upgrade of MedsPaL to include other EML treatments possible. More information about the Medicines Patent Pool, its public health mission and impact: https://medicinespatentpool.org/ For more detailed information on a given patent or its interpretation, MedsPaL users are encouraged to contact national patent offices or consult legal counsel. www.medspal.org Image Credits: The Medicines Patent Pool. Norway Becomes Latest Donor To Scale Up Pledges To The Global Fund 30/09/2019 Editorial team Norway pledged to scale up their investments to NOK 2.020 billion (over US $220 million) to The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria over the next three years. Norway joins other European donors such as Spain, Luxembourg, Ireland, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the European Commission, Germany, and Italy, who have stepped up their pledges ahead of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference next week, which will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon. “We must end the epidemics of HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in our lifetimes. To this end, Norway will increase its contribution to the Global Fund to two billion twenty million Norwegian kroner by 2023,” Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg, said in a press release. (left-right) ED of The Global Fund, Peter Sands; Norway’s PM, Erna Solberg The commitment was announced at the Global Citizen festival in New York this past weekend. The move was praised by Peter Sands, executive director of The Global Fund, who said, “Through global solidarity and effective partnerships like Norway’s, we will save millions of lives.” Norway is the 11th largest public donor to the Global Fund and gives the most on a per capita basis. Norway, Ghana and Germany, initiated a project to bring together 12 agencies, including The Global Fund, to accelerate work towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal for “Good Health and Well-being.” This initiative was launched just last week at the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The Global Fund has set a target for raising at least US$14 billion for the next three years, which will be used to fund its mission to “end the epidemics of HIV, tuberculosis and malaria.” As the Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference draws closer, stakeholders cautiously wait for the United States, which contributes about a third of the Fund’s budget, to announce whether they will be increasing their contributions like other donors. So far, the Global Fund claims its partnership has saved over 32 million lives, and expanded access to key preventative services and treatments for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. The Fund estimates that a successful Sixth Replenishment will go towards saving 16 million lives, slashing the mortality rate from HIV, TB, and malaria in half, and building stronger health systems by 2023. In addition, every US dollar invested in the Global Fund will have a return in broader economic gains of US$19. Video: Greta Visits The “Pollution Pods” 27/09/2019 Editorial team Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, visits the “Pollution Pods” with Dr. Maria Neira, director of Public Health at the WHO. The “Pollution Pods” allows visitors to experience simulated air pollution levels in different cities around the world, bringing attention to the connection between climate change, air pollution, and respiratory health. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-27-at-9.51.52-AM.mp4 Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Europe Charts Way Forward For Digital Health Solutions 03/10/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Bad Hofgastein, Austria – Whether its work or leisure, Europeans are moving more and more between different countries on the continent – but their health records generally lag far behind. And this can create big barriers to the treatment of chronic health conditions, not to mention effective diagnosis and treatment in emergencies, said members of a panel on digital health Thursday at the European Health Forum (Gastein). Until just recently, even filling a prescription across borders was challenging, said Clemens Martin Auer, EHFG President and Special Envoy for Health for Austria’s Federal Ministry for Labour, Social Affairs, Health and Consumer Protection. Marco Marsella “We need data that can travel from one country to another seamlessly,” said Marco Marsella, head of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (DG Connect). Finland and Estonia took one small step in that direction earlier this year by agreeing to a system of e-prescription exchanges, said Auer, and that model is now being followed by some 21 other countries. But Auer said it will still take time for real transformation to occur. On the plus side, the European Commission in 2019 issued a set of clear recommendations for harmonized standards that would ease the flow of e-health data between countries, while also protecting people’s privacy. But countries still need to formally adopt the new EU guidelines to unlock the electronic gates. And once standards are formally in place, health care providers across the region will need to start updating and adapting their own electronic records systems– a process that would take considerable time considering the large and fragmented health care infrastructure that exists. Fragmentation a Hallmark of Health Sector Services “We should stop promising heaven on earth, when it comes to the health sector, there is no other sector that is as fragmented,” declared Auer. In Austria alone, there are 10,000 outpatient medical clinics, 130 hospitals, and 1200 pharmacies, as well as facilities such as nursing homes, he noted in a follow-up interview. ”They all have totally different digital equipment operating. So this is a barrier; we need to invest in a new generation of digital infrastructure.” Clemens Martin Auer Paradoxically, digital transformation could be more expensive for more affluent developed countries, which began investing in electronic patient information systems ten or 20 years ago. “When these systems were instituted, the purposes were totally different. It was not about sharing data. It was about optimizing internal processes,” Auer observed. “But we have to speed up. We don’t want the Googles and Amazons to take over the field of patient data sharing – although I don’t think they would succeed.” The first wave of data sharing for e-prescriptions took place under the European Framework of CEF – Connecting European Facilities, Auer said. The first countries were Finland and Estonia, now 21 member states are part of this first wave of cross border sharing of prescriptions and patient summaries, which started only in the spring, although countries are not yet sharing lab results or imaging. “The next step would be that the European Commission as well as its member states will agree to only fund infrastructures that create an interoperable eco-space. So if a hospital in Stuttgart procures a new hospital information system, it will also be able to communicate with Paris or Lyon. “The standards exist. One is the European Commission recommendation for electronic health record exchange formats. The others are guidelines agreed to by European Union member states on infrastructure requirements. Now, we have to politically take up these standards. And then we will see an acceleration of services. This is one of the last missing links. And once these are adopted, we will see an acceleration of services.” As for consumer concerns about data protection and data security of health records, Auer said that he is convinced that European data and privacy laws are robust enough to reassure patients that sensitive health information will not accidentally fall into the hands of third parties such as potential employers or creditors. “There is a huge political consensus among the people who are responsible for the health care system that for the sake of the continuity of care, of processes and outcomes, we have to share data. And we also have sound regulation when it comes to data protection and data security; in general as a European region, on a policy level, we did our homework.” Digitalization with a ‘Human Touch’ Another critical aspect of the digital revolution in health is ensuring that new e-health applications are serving patients and health care workers needs, rather than introducing new apps or gadgets that could be difficult for some patients to manage. “Whenever anyone thinks about digital, they think about an app, but digital is about all sorts of settings that may not be patient care, but support the patient care,” pointed out Indra Joshi, Digital Health & AI Clinical Lead of the National Health Service (NHS) England. “Digitalization is so driven by technicians sometimes that we lose the main point of why we are doing this in the healthcare sector,” added Auer. “And the healthcare sector needs this to improve the quality of health care.” The needs are endless. They range from digital solutions that can provide for more seamless continuity of care; to technologies that free doctors and nurses from mundane tasks; as well as methods to facilitate the aggregation of big data for research. “Digitalization has the potential to increase the outcomes and the quality of processes,” said Auer, “But we need to think more about what does a doctor or nurse really need to get rid of the more routine work, and to free up health care professionals to provide more personalized treatment.” As Chief Innovation Officer at one of Israel’s largest health funds, Clalit, Ran Balicer spends considerable time thinking about how such innovations can be put into the service of more people-centred health systems. “There is a fear that digital transformation and Artificial Intelligence (AI) will reduce the human touch,” Balicer said. “This could not be further from the truth. In their daily work, physicians are doing too many repetitive tasks that do not require their unique skills. “AI will allow doctors and nurses to go back to their real purpose. Digital transformation would offer us an opportunity to move away from the tyranny of reactive medicine and move towards proactive and preventive care,” he stressed. “Assisted by data and AI, we can locate those patients in need of care before they actually become symptomatic,” he added. “AI will also allow us to move from ‘intuitive’ medicine to more field-safe mechanisms [for diagnosis and treatment]. Today 30% of care is wasted and human error is the third cause of death.” “Overall, I think that this will allow us to have more of the human touch.” (left-right) Marco Marsella; Ran Balicer; Clemens Martin Auer; Indra Joshi Image Credits: NHS England, European Health Forum Gastein, European Health Forum Gastein, European Health Forum Gastein. Health In The ‘Economy Of Well-Being’ 03/10/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Bad Hofgastein, Austria – Promoting an “economy of well-being” can drive European development agendas more sustainably, as well as making health systems more human-centered and responsive to client’s needs, said Finland’s Vice Minister of Social Affairs and Health in a keynote address Thursday at the European Health Forum (Gastein). The three-day conference, which began Wednesday, has brought together some 600 health policymakers, researchers and practitioners from around Europe to explore challenges, trends and directions for the region’s health systems under the theme “A Healthy Dose of Disruption.” “The economy of well-being emphasizes the importance of placing individuals at the center of economic measures, and economic growth also improves people’s well-being,” said Eila Makipaa, the Finnish Vice Minister, speaking at a session devoted to the well-being theme. She noted that Finland has made the concept a cornerstone of its European Union presidency term, viewing it as a framework that can advance disparate issues from climate action to democracy. “The role of well-being is crucial in the context of human rights and security; the economy of well-being is part of the Finnish presidency programme, where we also see how well-being policies can boost productivity, generate economic growth and social stability, and ensure that no one is left behind in our rapidly changing world.” Social inclusion is not only a positive human value, it is good for the economy, added Josep Figueras, director of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, noting that treatment of patients at advanced disease stages or reintegration of people who are unemployed are all more costly undertakings than preventive measures taken proactively. “Well-being itself… is a way to bring the diverse sectors of health, social protection, gender, environment together under one umbrella,” he said. Some countries like New Zealand and France, as well as regions such as Wales in the United Kingdom, are already using well-being measures to evaluate the performance of government in different public policy arenas, he observed. But most European countries are “still struggling” with effective ways of monitoring and measuring progress in an economy built around ‘well-being.’ “We want to measure things differently, but how do we put that into practice within European policies and strategies?” he asked. Well-Being In An Ageing World Creating an economy of well-being in ageing societies is a key element of the challenge for Europe as well as other developed countries, said Esko Aho. Aho, in 1991 became Finland’s youngest prime minister ever taking office at the age of 36. Today, at age 65, he continues to work as CEO of a private sector firm and he doesn’t envision retiring anytime soon. ”Silver is the next green,” said Aho. Aho said that economies need to become more inclusive of older people – or else suffer the consequences of having too few active workers to support the health and social welfare benefits of people across the life cycle. However, health and economic leaders have been slow in coming to grips with the new demographic realities facing Europe as well as other developed economies. “There is a common view that older citizens are less productive,” observed Aho. “That is why they are kicked out first when you have to reduce your work force.” Recent research in the automobile industry contradicts that perception. It has shown that older employees’ competencies are equivalent to their younger counterparts – because older employees’ experience levels compensate for shortcomings in other areas. Esko Aho addresses the audience. “There are people who have the capacity to keep working until 80, but technically are retired. We have these standardized solutions, which we are afraid to change, we are afraid to move to more personalized solutions,” he said. “The 100-year life is totally different than 65 year life when Bismarck created the pension system,” he added, referring to the German chancellor, Otto Von Bismarck, who in 1883 created the first mandatory retirement and pension system in a move to counteract growing Marxist influence. Older workers also suffer from other forms of powerful but subtle discrimination which cause them to fall behind, added Jonathan Cylus, an economist and the London Hub Coordinator for the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. For instance, older people are less likely to be offered training opportunities than their younger counterparts – and that can cause them to fall behind their peers in performance, . “We need to have a more equitable approach to ensure that older people are able to work, and that they have the same opportunities,” he said, noting that there are 100 million people over the age of 65 in Europe and while incomes often decline after retirement, consumption needs remain about the same, creating economic stress. At the same time, he said one-size-fits all approaches need to be rejected. “The knee jerk reaction is to raise pension ages and that can also cause stress among people who didn’t expect this,” he said. “The economy of well-being is about more personalisation and more flexible policy-making.” Image Credits: David Rowe, European Health Forum Gastein. Sweden Steps Up Fight Against Epidemics With Strong Pledge to Global Fund 03/10/2019 Editorial team Sweden pledged to increase its support to the Global Fund by 14%, committing some SEK 2.85 billion (US $290 million) over the next three years, one of the latest in a line of donors to step to the call of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment Conference, coming up next week on October 9-10 in Lyon. The pledge was announced Thursday by Sweden’s Minister for International Development Cooperation, Peter Eriksson. “In recent years, we have seen a tougher climate and dwindling interest in women’s rights, and particularly sexual and reproductive rights. For this reason, Sweden’s contribution to the Global Fund is particularly important,” said Eriksson in a Global Fund press release. “Through this increased contribution, Sweden will remain a strong donor to global action for health. And with this, we will also have increased expectations and demands that the Global Fund will deliver in Sweden’s priority areas, including preventive efforts, equitable health, human rights and sexual and reproductive health and rights.” Peter Sands, Executive Director of the Global Fund, commended Sweden’s commitment saying: “Sweden’s investments in global health have contributed immensely in the fight against HIV, TB and malaria and in building strong health systems.” The Swedish announcement follows recent pledges by Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg to give NOK2.02 billion to the Sixth Replenishment, and Spain’s commitment for EUR100 million Euros. Five private sector partners announced new pledges for the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment during the World Economic Forum on Africa on September 4-6 in Cape Town. Natalie Portman introduces Peter Sands and Erna Solberg at the Global Citizens Festival 2019 Meanwhile activity in the lead up to the conference has intensified with high-powered celebrities such as, Annie Lennox, Diane Kruger, Natalie Portman and Penélope Cruz launching a petition on change.org in an open letter addressed to today’s 7-year-olds, calling on the world to commit to end AIDS, TB and malaria by 2030 – when today’s children become adults. Portman also appeared live on stage calling on the world to step up the fight and support the Global Fund at the annual Global Citizen concert in New York on September 28. The most recent Global Fund Results Report 2019 credits the partnership with saving 32 million lives from the three leading diseases that it is pledged to combat – HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria – since its inception in 2002. The Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon, France on October 9-10 2019, with the goal to raise US $14 billion for the fund’s next three-year cycle. At the United Nations General Assembly in New York last week, the Global Fund also joined 11 other major UN and international health agencies to launch a joint action plan, Stronger Collaboration, Better Health: Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All, to better support countries to accelerate progress towards the health-related Sustainable Development Goals. This followed the landmark commitment by UN member states to scale up efforts to achieve universal health coverage by 2030. Image Credits: Global Citizen. The Medicines Patent Pool Publishes Intellectual Property Status Of 18 Drugs Added To WHO Essential Medicines List 03/10/2019 Press release [The Medicines Patent Pool] Geneva (2 October 2019) — The Medicines Patent Pool today announced the first of a two-step update of its database MedsPaL to include additional patented small molecule medicines following the publication of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s updated Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) in July. Launched in 2016, MedsPaL is a free resource on the intellectual property status of patented medicines included in the WHO EML for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Initially covering selected HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis medicines in LMICs, MedsPaL expanded to all patented treatments on the EML in 2017. “We are passionate in our belief that public health stakeholders must have simplified access to accurate patent information on essential medicines in order to make informed decisions when the time comes to procure and supply those important drugs to the people who need them,” said Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool. “MedsPaL now provides patent and licensing data covering 96 priority medicines in more than 130 low- and middle-income countries and includes over 8,000 national patents and patent applications.” This update includes data on patents for medicines to treat lung cancer, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nausea, post-partum haemorrhage, hypertension and for three antibiotics, namely abiraterone, afatinib, apixaban, aprepitant, bortezomib, carbetocin (heat-stable formulation), ceftazidime+avibactam, dabigatran, edoxaban, erlotinib, gefitinib, lenalinomide, meropenem+vaborbactam, plazomicin, rivaroxaban, telmisartan+amlodipine, telmisartan+hydrochlorothiazide and tiotropium. For some of these medicines, key patents have expired, but a number of relevant secondary patents remain in force in some LMICs. Information on patented biologics will be made available in a second update before the end of the year. “It is fundamental that countries willing to provide greater access to essential medicines can refer to a reliable up-to-date database like MedsPaL to check the patent status of the medicines they want to procure,” said Nicola Magrini, Secretary of the WHO Essential Medicines List. “Access to medicines is certainly an important pillar of Universal Health Coverage and MedsPaL supports its efficient implementation at country level.” The MPP regularly updates the patent and licensing status data included in MedsPaL, including through data collected from national and regional patent offices from around the world. The MPP has signed collaborative agreements with the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO), the European Patent Office (EPO), Argentina’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Brazil’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Chile’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI), Dominican Republic’s National Office of Industrial Property (ONAPI), Ecuador’s National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI), the Egyptian Patent Office (EGPO), El Salvador’s National Registry Center (CNR), Peru’s National Institute for the Defense of Free Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI), South Africa’s Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC), and Uruguay’s National Directorate of Industrial Property (DNPI). About the Medicines Patent Pool The Medicines Patent Pool is a United Nations-backed public health organisation working to increase access to, and facilitate the development of, life-saving medicines for low- and middle-income countries. Through its innovative business model, the MPP partners with civil society, governments, international organisations, industry, patient groups and other stakeholders, to prioritise and licence needed medicines and pool intellectual property to encourage generic manufacture and the development of new formulations. To date, the MPP has signed agreements with nine patent holders for thirteen HIV antiretrovirals, one HIV technology platform, three hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals and a tuberculosis treatment. The MPP was founded by Unitaid, which serves as sole funder for the MPP’s activities in HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis. Funding provided by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) for MPP’s feasibility study on the potential expansion of its licensing activities into patented essential medicines made the upgrade of MedsPaL to include other EML treatments possible. More information about the Medicines Patent Pool, its public health mission and impact: https://medicinespatentpool.org/ For more detailed information on a given patent or its interpretation, MedsPaL users are encouraged to contact national patent offices or consult legal counsel. www.medspal.org Image Credits: The Medicines Patent Pool. Norway Becomes Latest Donor To Scale Up Pledges To The Global Fund 30/09/2019 Editorial team Norway pledged to scale up their investments to NOK 2.020 billion (over US $220 million) to The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria over the next three years. Norway joins other European donors such as Spain, Luxembourg, Ireland, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the European Commission, Germany, and Italy, who have stepped up their pledges ahead of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference next week, which will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon. “We must end the epidemics of HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in our lifetimes. To this end, Norway will increase its contribution to the Global Fund to two billion twenty million Norwegian kroner by 2023,” Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg, said in a press release. (left-right) ED of The Global Fund, Peter Sands; Norway’s PM, Erna Solberg The commitment was announced at the Global Citizen festival in New York this past weekend. The move was praised by Peter Sands, executive director of The Global Fund, who said, “Through global solidarity and effective partnerships like Norway’s, we will save millions of lives.” Norway is the 11th largest public donor to the Global Fund and gives the most on a per capita basis. Norway, Ghana and Germany, initiated a project to bring together 12 agencies, including The Global Fund, to accelerate work towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal for “Good Health and Well-being.” This initiative was launched just last week at the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The Global Fund has set a target for raising at least US$14 billion for the next three years, which will be used to fund its mission to “end the epidemics of HIV, tuberculosis and malaria.” As the Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference draws closer, stakeholders cautiously wait for the United States, which contributes about a third of the Fund’s budget, to announce whether they will be increasing their contributions like other donors. So far, the Global Fund claims its partnership has saved over 32 million lives, and expanded access to key preventative services and treatments for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. The Fund estimates that a successful Sixth Replenishment will go towards saving 16 million lives, slashing the mortality rate from HIV, TB, and malaria in half, and building stronger health systems by 2023. In addition, every US dollar invested in the Global Fund will have a return in broader economic gains of US$19. Video: Greta Visits The “Pollution Pods” 27/09/2019 Editorial team Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, visits the “Pollution Pods” with Dr. Maria Neira, director of Public Health at the WHO. The “Pollution Pods” allows visitors to experience simulated air pollution levels in different cities around the world, bringing attention to the connection between climate change, air pollution, and respiratory health. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-27-at-9.51.52-AM.mp4 Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Health In The ‘Economy Of Well-Being’ 03/10/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher Bad Hofgastein, Austria – Promoting an “economy of well-being” can drive European development agendas more sustainably, as well as making health systems more human-centered and responsive to client’s needs, said Finland’s Vice Minister of Social Affairs and Health in a keynote address Thursday at the European Health Forum (Gastein). The three-day conference, which began Wednesday, has brought together some 600 health policymakers, researchers and practitioners from around Europe to explore challenges, trends and directions for the region’s health systems under the theme “A Healthy Dose of Disruption.” “The economy of well-being emphasizes the importance of placing individuals at the center of economic measures, and economic growth also improves people’s well-being,” said Eila Makipaa, the Finnish Vice Minister, speaking at a session devoted to the well-being theme. She noted that Finland has made the concept a cornerstone of its European Union presidency term, viewing it as a framework that can advance disparate issues from climate action to democracy. “The role of well-being is crucial in the context of human rights and security; the economy of well-being is part of the Finnish presidency programme, where we also see how well-being policies can boost productivity, generate economic growth and social stability, and ensure that no one is left behind in our rapidly changing world.” Social inclusion is not only a positive human value, it is good for the economy, added Josep Figueras, director of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, noting that treatment of patients at advanced disease stages or reintegration of people who are unemployed are all more costly undertakings than preventive measures taken proactively. “Well-being itself… is a way to bring the diverse sectors of health, social protection, gender, environment together under one umbrella,” he said. Some countries like New Zealand and France, as well as regions such as Wales in the United Kingdom, are already using well-being measures to evaluate the performance of government in different public policy arenas, he observed. But most European countries are “still struggling” with effective ways of monitoring and measuring progress in an economy built around ‘well-being.’ “We want to measure things differently, but how do we put that into practice within European policies and strategies?” he asked. Well-Being In An Ageing World Creating an economy of well-being in ageing societies is a key element of the challenge for Europe as well as other developed countries, said Esko Aho. Aho, in 1991 became Finland’s youngest prime minister ever taking office at the age of 36. Today, at age 65, he continues to work as CEO of a private sector firm and he doesn’t envision retiring anytime soon. ”Silver is the next green,” said Aho. Aho said that economies need to become more inclusive of older people – or else suffer the consequences of having too few active workers to support the health and social welfare benefits of people across the life cycle. However, health and economic leaders have been slow in coming to grips with the new demographic realities facing Europe as well as other developed economies. “There is a common view that older citizens are less productive,” observed Aho. “That is why they are kicked out first when you have to reduce your work force.” Recent research in the automobile industry contradicts that perception. It has shown that older employees’ competencies are equivalent to their younger counterparts – because older employees’ experience levels compensate for shortcomings in other areas. Esko Aho addresses the audience. “There are people who have the capacity to keep working until 80, but technically are retired. We have these standardized solutions, which we are afraid to change, we are afraid to move to more personalized solutions,” he said. “The 100-year life is totally different than 65 year life when Bismarck created the pension system,” he added, referring to the German chancellor, Otto Von Bismarck, who in 1883 created the first mandatory retirement and pension system in a move to counteract growing Marxist influence. Older workers also suffer from other forms of powerful but subtle discrimination which cause them to fall behind, added Jonathan Cylus, an economist and the London Hub Coordinator for the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. For instance, older people are less likely to be offered training opportunities than their younger counterparts – and that can cause them to fall behind their peers in performance, . “We need to have a more equitable approach to ensure that older people are able to work, and that they have the same opportunities,” he said, noting that there are 100 million people over the age of 65 in Europe and while incomes often decline after retirement, consumption needs remain about the same, creating economic stress. At the same time, he said one-size-fits all approaches need to be rejected. “The knee jerk reaction is to raise pension ages and that can also cause stress among people who didn’t expect this,” he said. “The economy of well-being is about more personalisation and more flexible policy-making.” Image Credits: David Rowe, European Health Forum Gastein. Sweden Steps Up Fight Against Epidemics With Strong Pledge to Global Fund 03/10/2019 Editorial team Sweden pledged to increase its support to the Global Fund by 14%, committing some SEK 2.85 billion (US $290 million) over the next three years, one of the latest in a line of donors to step to the call of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment Conference, coming up next week on October 9-10 in Lyon. The pledge was announced Thursday by Sweden’s Minister for International Development Cooperation, Peter Eriksson. “In recent years, we have seen a tougher climate and dwindling interest in women’s rights, and particularly sexual and reproductive rights. For this reason, Sweden’s contribution to the Global Fund is particularly important,” said Eriksson in a Global Fund press release. “Through this increased contribution, Sweden will remain a strong donor to global action for health. And with this, we will also have increased expectations and demands that the Global Fund will deliver in Sweden’s priority areas, including preventive efforts, equitable health, human rights and sexual and reproductive health and rights.” Peter Sands, Executive Director of the Global Fund, commended Sweden’s commitment saying: “Sweden’s investments in global health have contributed immensely in the fight against HIV, TB and malaria and in building strong health systems.” The Swedish announcement follows recent pledges by Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg to give NOK2.02 billion to the Sixth Replenishment, and Spain’s commitment for EUR100 million Euros. Five private sector partners announced new pledges for the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment during the World Economic Forum on Africa on September 4-6 in Cape Town. Natalie Portman introduces Peter Sands and Erna Solberg at the Global Citizens Festival 2019 Meanwhile activity in the lead up to the conference has intensified with high-powered celebrities such as, Annie Lennox, Diane Kruger, Natalie Portman and Penélope Cruz launching a petition on change.org in an open letter addressed to today’s 7-year-olds, calling on the world to commit to end AIDS, TB and malaria by 2030 – when today’s children become adults. Portman also appeared live on stage calling on the world to step up the fight and support the Global Fund at the annual Global Citizen concert in New York on September 28. The most recent Global Fund Results Report 2019 credits the partnership with saving 32 million lives from the three leading diseases that it is pledged to combat – HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria – since its inception in 2002. The Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon, France on October 9-10 2019, with the goal to raise US $14 billion for the fund’s next three-year cycle. At the United Nations General Assembly in New York last week, the Global Fund also joined 11 other major UN and international health agencies to launch a joint action plan, Stronger Collaboration, Better Health: Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All, to better support countries to accelerate progress towards the health-related Sustainable Development Goals. This followed the landmark commitment by UN member states to scale up efforts to achieve universal health coverage by 2030. Image Credits: Global Citizen. The Medicines Patent Pool Publishes Intellectual Property Status Of 18 Drugs Added To WHO Essential Medicines List 03/10/2019 Press release [The Medicines Patent Pool] Geneva (2 October 2019) — The Medicines Patent Pool today announced the first of a two-step update of its database MedsPaL to include additional patented small molecule medicines following the publication of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s updated Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) in July. Launched in 2016, MedsPaL is a free resource on the intellectual property status of patented medicines included in the WHO EML for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Initially covering selected HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis medicines in LMICs, MedsPaL expanded to all patented treatments on the EML in 2017. “We are passionate in our belief that public health stakeholders must have simplified access to accurate patent information on essential medicines in order to make informed decisions when the time comes to procure and supply those important drugs to the people who need them,” said Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool. “MedsPaL now provides patent and licensing data covering 96 priority medicines in more than 130 low- and middle-income countries and includes over 8,000 national patents and patent applications.” This update includes data on patents for medicines to treat lung cancer, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nausea, post-partum haemorrhage, hypertension and for three antibiotics, namely abiraterone, afatinib, apixaban, aprepitant, bortezomib, carbetocin (heat-stable formulation), ceftazidime+avibactam, dabigatran, edoxaban, erlotinib, gefitinib, lenalinomide, meropenem+vaborbactam, plazomicin, rivaroxaban, telmisartan+amlodipine, telmisartan+hydrochlorothiazide and tiotropium. For some of these medicines, key patents have expired, but a number of relevant secondary patents remain in force in some LMICs. Information on patented biologics will be made available in a second update before the end of the year. “It is fundamental that countries willing to provide greater access to essential medicines can refer to a reliable up-to-date database like MedsPaL to check the patent status of the medicines they want to procure,” said Nicola Magrini, Secretary of the WHO Essential Medicines List. “Access to medicines is certainly an important pillar of Universal Health Coverage and MedsPaL supports its efficient implementation at country level.” The MPP regularly updates the patent and licensing status data included in MedsPaL, including through data collected from national and regional patent offices from around the world. The MPP has signed collaborative agreements with the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO), the European Patent Office (EPO), Argentina’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Brazil’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Chile’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI), Dominican Republic’s National Office of Industrial Property (ONAPI), Ecuador’s National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI), the Egyptian Patent Office (EGPO), El Salvador’s National Registry Center (CNR), Peru’s National Institute for the Defense of Free Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI), South Africa’s Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC), and Uruguay’s National Directorate of Industrial Property (DNPI). About the Medicines Patent Pool The Medicines Patent Pool is a United Nations-backed public health organisation working to increase access to, and facilitate the development of, life-saving medicines for low- and middle-income countries. Through its innovative business model, the MPP partners with civil society, governments, international organisations, industry, patient groups and other stakeholders, to prioritise and licence needed medicines and pool intellectual property to encourage generic manufacture and the development of new formulations. To date, the MPP has signed agreements with nine patent holders for thirteen HIV antiretrovirals, one HIV technology platform, three hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals and a tuberculosis treatment. The MPP was founded by Unitaid, which serves as sole funder for the MPP’s activities in HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis. Funding provided by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) for MPP’s feasibility study on the potential expansion of its licensing activities into patented essential medicines made the upgrade of MedsPaL to include other EML treatments possible. More information about the Medicines Patent Pool, its public health mission and impact: https://medicinespatentpool.org/ For more detailed information on a given patent or its interpretation, MedsPaL users are encouraged to contact national patent offices or consult legal counsel. www.medspal.org Image Credits: The Medicines Patent Pool. Norway Becomes Latest Donor To Scale Up Pledges To The Global Fund 30/09/2019 Editorial team Norway pledged to scale up their investments to NOK 2.020 billion (over US $220 million) to The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria over the next three years. Norway joins other European donors such as Spain, Luxembourg, Ireland, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the European Commission, Germany, and Italy, who have stepped up their pledges ahead of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference next week, which will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon. “We must end the epidemics of HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in our lifetimes. To this end, Norway will increase its contribution to the Global Fund to two billion twenty million Norwegian kroner by 2023,” Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg, said in a press release. (left-right) ED of The Global Fund, Peter Sands; Norway’s PM, Erna Solberg The commitment was announced at the Global Citizen festival in New York this past weekend. The move was praised by Peter Sands, executive director of The Global Fund, who said, “Through global solidarity and effective partnerships like Norway’s, we will save millions of lives.” Norway is the 11th largest public donor to the Global Fund and gives the most on a per capita basis. Norway, Ghana and Germany, initiated a project to bring together 12 agencies, including The Global Fund, to accelerate work towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal for “Good Health and Well-being.” This initiative was launched just last week at the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The Global Fund has set a target for raising at least US$14 billion for the next three years, which will be used to fund its mission to “end the epidemics of HIV, tuberculosis and malaria.” As the Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference draws closer, stakeholders cautiously wait for the United States, which contributes about a third of the Fund’s budget, to announce whether they will be increasing their contributions like other donors. So far, the Global Fund claims its partnership has saved over 32 million lives, and expanded access to key preventative services and treatments for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. The Fund estimates that a successful Sixth Replenishment will go towards saving 16 million lives, slashing the mortality rate from HIV, TB, and malaria in half, and building stronger health systems by 2023. In addition, every US dollar invested in the Global Fund will have a return in broader economic gains of US$19. Video: Greta Visits The “Pollution Pods” 27/09/2019 Editorial team Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, visits the “Pollution Pods” with Dr. Maria Neira, director of Public Health at the WHO. The “Pollution Pods” allows visitors to experience simulated air pollution levels in different cities around the world, bringing attention to the connection between climate change, air pollution, and respiratory health. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-27-at-9.51.52-AM.mp4 Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Sweden Steps Up Fight Against Epidemics With Strong Pledge to Global Fund 03/10/2019 Editorial team Sweden pledged to increase its support to the Global Fund by 14%, committing some SEK 2.85 billion (US $290 million) over the next three years, one of the latest in a line of donors to step to the call of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment Conference, coming up next week on October 9-10 in Lyon. The pledge was announced Thursday by Sweden’s Minister for International Development Cooperation, Peter Eriksson. “In recent years, we have seen a tougher climate and dwindling interest in women’s rights, and particularly sexual and reproductive rights. For this reason, Sweden’s contribution to the Global Fund is particularly important,” said Eriksson in a Global Fund press release. “Through this increased contribution, Sweden will remain a strong donor to global action for health. And with this, we will also have increased expectations and demands that the Global Fund will deliver in Sweden’s priority areas, including preventive efforts, equitable health, human rights and sexual and reproductive health and rights.” Peter Sands, Executive Director of the Global Fund, commended Sweden’s commitment saying: “Sweden’s investments in global health have contributed immensely in the fight against HIV, TB and malaria and in building strong health systems.” The Swedish announcement follows recent pledges by Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg to give NOK2.02 billion to the Sixth Replenishment, and Spain’s commitment for EUR100 million Euros. Five private sector partners announced new pledges for the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment during the World Economic Forum on Africa on September 4-6 in Cape Town. Natalie Portman introduces Peter Sands and Erna Solberg at the Global Citizens Festival 2019 Meanwhile activity in the lead up to the conference has intensified with high-powered celebrities such as, Annie Lennox, Diane Kruger, Natalie Portman and Penélope Cruz launching a petition on change.org in an open letter addressed to today’s 7-year-olds, calling on the world to commit to end AIDS, TB and malaria by 2030 – when today’s children become adults. Portman also appeared live on stage calling on the world to step up the fight and support the Global Fund at the annual Global Citizen concert in New York on September 28. The most recent Global Fund Results Report 2019 credits the partnership with saving 32 million lives from the three leading diseases that it is pledged to combat – HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria – since its inception in 2002. The Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon, France on October 9-10 2019, with the goal to raise US $14 billion for the fund’s next three-year cycle. At the United Nations General Assembly in New York last week, the Global Fund also joined 11 other major UN and international health agencies to launch a joint action plan, Stronger Collaboration, Better Health: Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All, to better support countries to accelerate progress towards the health-related Sustainable Development Goals. This followed the landmark commitment by UN member states to scale up efforts to achieve universal health coverage by 2030. Image Credits: Global Citizen. The Medicines Patent Pool Publishes Intellectual Property Status Of 18 Drugs Added To WHO Essential Medicines List 03/10/2019 Press release [The Medicines Patent Pool] Geneva (2 October 2019) — The Medicines Patent Pool today announced the first of a two-step update of its database MedsPaL to include additional patented small molecule medicines following the publication of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s updated Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) in July. Launched in 2016, MedsPaL is a free resource on the intellectual property status of patented medicines included in the WHO EML for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Initially covering selected HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis medicines in LMICs, MedsPaL expanded to all patented treatments on the EML in 2017. “We are passionate in our belief that public health stakeholders must have simplified access to accurate patent information on essential medicines in order to make informed decisions when the time comes to procure and supply those important drugs to the people who need them,” said Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool. “MedsPaL now provides patent and licensing data covering 96 priority medicines in more than 130 low- and middle-income countries and includes over 8,000 national patents and patent applications.” This update includes data on patents for medicines to treat lung cancer, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nausea, post-partum haemorrhage, hypertension and for three antibiotics, namely abiraterone, afatinib, apixaban, aprepitant, bortezomib, carbetocin (heat-stable formulation), ceftazidime+avibactam, dabigatran, edoxaban, erlotinib, gefitinib, lenalinomide, meropenem+vaborbactam, plazomicin, rivaroxaban, telmisartan+amlodipine, telmisartan+hydrochlorothiazide and tiotropium. For some of these medicines, key patents have expired, but a number of relevant secondary patents remain in force in some LMICs. Information on patented biologics will be made available in a second update before the end of the year. “It is fundamental that countries willing to provide greater access to essential medicines can refer to a reliable up-to-date database like MedsPaL to check the patent status of the medicines they want to procure,” said Nicola Magrini, Secretary of the WHO Essential Medicines List. “Access to medicines is certainly an important pillar of Universal Health Coverage and MedsPaL supports its efficient implementation at country level.” The MPP regularly updates the patent and licensing status data included in MedsPaL, including through data collected from national and regional patent offices from around the world. The MPP has signed collaborative agreements with the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO), the European Patent Office (EPO), Argentina’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Brazil’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Chile’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI), Dominican Republic’s National Office of Industrial Property (ONAPI), Ecuador’s National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI), the Egyptian Patent Office (EGPO), El Salvador’s National Registry Center (CNR), Peru’s National Institute for the Defense of Free Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI), South Africa’s Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC), and Uruguay’s National Directorate of Industrial Property (DNPI). About the Medicines Patent Pool The Medicines Patent Pool is a United Nations-backed public health organisation working to increase access to, and facilitate the development of, life-saving medicines for low- and middle-income countries. Through its innovative business model, the MPP partners with civil society, governments, international organisations, industry, patient groups and other stakeholders, to prioritise and licence needed medicines and pool intellectual property to encourage generic manufacture and the development of new formulations. To date, the MPP has signed agreements with nine patent holders for thirteen HIV antiretrovirals, one HIV technology platform, three hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals and a tuberculosis treatment. The MPP was founded by Unitaid, which serves as sole funder for the MPP’s activities in HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis. Funding provided by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) for MPP’s feasibility study on the potential expansion of its licensing activities into patented essential medicines made the upgrade of MedsPaL to include other EML treatments possible. More information about the Medicines Patent Pool, its public health mission and impact: https://medicinespatentpool.org/ For more detailed information on a given patent or its interpretation, MedsPaL users are encouraged to contact national patent offices or consult legal counsel. www.medspal.org Image Credits: The Medicines Patent Pool. Norway Becomes Latest Donor To Scale Up Pledges To The Global Fund 30/09/2019 Editorial team Norway pledged to scale up their investments to NOK 2.020 billion (over US $220 million) to The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria over the next three years. Norway joins other European donors such as Spain, Luxembourg, Ireland, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the European Commission, Germany, and Italy, who have stepped up their pledges ahead of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference next week, which will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon. “We must end the epidemics of HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in our lifetimes. To this end, Norway will increase its contribution to the Global Fund to two billion twenty million Norwegian kroner by 2023,” Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg, said in a press release. (left-right) ED of The Global Fund, Peter Sands; Norway’s PM, Erna Solberg The commitment was announced at the Global Citizen festival in New York this past weekend. The move was praised by Peter Sands, executive director of The Global Fund, who said, “Through global solidarity and effective partnerships like Norway’s, we will save millions of lives.” Norway is the 11th largest public donor to the Global Fund and gives the most on a per capita basis. Norway, Ghana and Germany, initiated a project to bring together 12 agencies, including The Global Fund, to accelerate work towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal for “Good Health and Well-being.” This initiative was launched just last week at the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The Global Fund has set a target for raising at least US$14 billion for the next three years, which will be used to fund its mission to “end the epidemics of HIV, tuberculosis and malaria.” As the Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference draws closer, stakeholders cautiously wait for the United States, which contributes about a third of the Fund’s budget, to announce whether they will be increasing their contributions like other donors. So far, the Global Fund claims its partnership has saved over 32 million lives, and expanded access to key preventative services and treatments for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. The Fund estimates that a successful Sixth Replenishment will go towards saving 16 million lives, slashing the mortality rate from HIV, TB, and malaria in half, and building stronger health systems by 2023. In addition, every US dollar invested in the Global Fund will have a return in broader economic gains of US$19. Video: Greta Visits The “Pollution Pods” 27/09/2019 Editorial team Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, visits the “Pollution Pods” with Dr. Maria Neira, director of Public Health at the WHO. The “Pollution Pods” allows visitors to experience simulated air pollution levels in different cities around the world, bringing attention to the connection between climate change, air pollution, and respiratory health. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-27-at-9.51.52-AM.mp4 Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
The Medicines Patent Pool Publishes Intellectual Property Status Of 18 Drugs Added To WHO Essential Medicines List 03/10/2019 Press release [The Medicines Patent Pool] Geneva (2 October 2019) — The Medicines Patent Pool today announced the first of a two-step update of its database MedsPaL to include additional patented small molecule medicines following the publication of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s updated Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) in July. Launched in 2016, MedsPaL is a free resource on the intellectual property status of patented medicines included in the WHO EML for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Initially covering selected HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis medicines in LMICs, MedsPaL expanded to all patented treatments on the EML in 2017. “We are passionate in our belief that public health stakeholders must have simplified access to accurate patent information on essential medicines in order to make informed decisions when the time comes to procure and supply those important drugs to the people who need them,” said Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool. “MedsPaL now provides patent and licensing data covering 96 priority medicines in more than 130 low- and middle-income countries and includes over 8,000 national patents and patent applications.” This update includes data on patents for medicines to treat lung cancer, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nausea, post-partum haemorrhage, hypertension and for three antibiotics, namely abiraterone, afatinib, apixaban, aprepitant, bortezomib, carbetocin (heat-stable formulation), ceftazidime+avibactam, dabigatran, edoxaban, erlotinib, gefitinib, lenalinomide, meropenem+vaborbactam, plazomicin, rivaroxaban, telmisartan+amlodipine, telmisartan+hydrochlorothiazide and tiotropium. For some of these medicines, key patents have expired, but a number of relevant secondary patents remain in force in some LMICs. Information on patented biologics will be made available in a second update before the end of the year. “It is fundamental that countries willing to provide greater access to essential medicines can refer to a reliable up-to-date database like MedsPaL to check the patent status of the medicines they want to procure,” said Nicola Magrini, Secretary of the WHO Essential Medicines List. “Access to medicines is certainly an important pillar of Universal Health Coverage and MedsPaL supports its efficient implementation at country level.” The MPP regularly updates the patent and licensing status data included in MedsPaL, including through data collected from national and regional patent offices from around the world. The MPP has signed collaborative agreements with the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO), the European Patent Office (EPO), Argentina’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Brazil’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Chile’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI), Dominican Republic’s National Office of Industrial Property (ONAPI), Ecuador’s National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI), the Egyptian Patent Office (EGPO), El Salvador’s National Registry Center (CNR), Peru’s National Institute for the Defense of Free Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI), South Africa’s Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC), and Uruguay’s National Directorate of Industrial Property (DNPI). About the Medicines Patent Pool The Medicines Patent Pool is a United Nations-backed public health organisation working to increase access to, and facilitate the development of, life-saving medicines for low- and middle-income countries. Through its innovative business model, the MPP partners with civil society, governments, international organisations, industry, patient groups and other stakeholders, to prioritise and licence needed medicines and pool intellectual property to encourage generic manufacture and the development of new formulations. To date, the MPP has signed agreements with nine patent holders for thirteen HIV antiretrovirals, one HIV technology platform, three hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals and a tuberculosis treatment. The MPP was founded by Unitaid, which serves as sole funder for the MPP’s activities in HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis. Funding provided by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) for MPP’s feasibility study on the potential expansion of its licensing activities into patented essential medicines made the upgrade of MedsPaL to include other EML treatments possible. More information about the Medicines Patent Pool, its public health mission and impact: https://medicinespatentpool.org/ For more detailed information on a given patent or its interpretation, MedsPaL users are encouraged to contact national patent offices or consult legal counsel. www.medspal.org Image Credits: The Medicines Patent Pool. Norway Becomes Latest Donor To Scale Up Pledges To The Global Fund 30/09/2019 Editorial team Norway pledged to scale up their investments to NOK 2.020 billion (over US $220 million) to The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria over the next three years. Norway joins other European donors such as Spain, Luxembourg, Ireland, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the European Commission, Germany, and Italy, who have stepped up their pledges ahead of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference next week, which will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon. “We must end the epidemics of HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in our lifetimes. To this end, Norway will increase its contribution to the Global Fund to two billion twenty million Norwegian kroner by 2023,” Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg, said in a press release. (left-right) ED of The Global Fund, Peter Sands; Norway’s PM, Erna Solberg The commitment was announced at the Global Citizen festival in New York this past weekend. The move was praised by Peter Sands, executive director of The Global Fund, who said, “Through global solidarity and effective partnerships like Norway’s, we will save millions of lives.” Norway is the 11th largest public donor to the Global Fund and gives the most on a per capita basis. Norway, Ghana and Germany, initiated a project to bring together 12 agencies, including The Global Fund, to accelerate work towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal for “Good Health and Well-being.” This initiative was launched just last week at the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The Global Fund has set a target for raising at least US$14 billion for the next three years, which will be used to fund its mission to “end the epidemics of HIV, tuberculosis and malaria.” As the Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference draws closer, stakeholders cautiously wait for the United States, which contributes about a third of the Fund’s budget, to announce whether they will be increasing their contributions like other donors. So far, the Global Fund claims its partnership has saved over 32 million lives, and expanded access to key preventative services and treatments for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. The Fund estimates that a successful Sixth Replenishment will go towards saving 16 million lives, slashing the mortality rate from HIV, TB, and malaria in half, and building stronger health systems by 2023. In addition, every US dollar invested in the Global Fund will have a return in broader economic gains of US$19. Video: Greta Visits The “Pollution Pods” 27/09/2019 Editorial team Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, visits the “Pollution Pods” with Dr. Maria Neira, director of Public Health at the WHO. The “Pollution Pods” allows visitors to experience simulated air pollution levels in different cities around the world, bringing attention to the connection between climate change, air pollution, and respiratory health. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-27-at-9.51.52-AM.mp4 Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Norway Becomes Latest Donor To Scale Up Pledges To The Global Fund 30/09/2019 Editorial team Norway pledged to scale up their investments to NOK 2.020 billion (over US $220 million) to The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria over the next three years. Norway joins other European donors such as Spain, Luxembourg, Ireland, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the European Commission, Germany, and Italy, who have stepped up their pledges ahead of the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference next week, which will be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Lyon. “We must end the epidemics of HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in our lifetimes. To this end, Norway will increase its contribution to the Global Fund to two billion twenty million Norwegian kroner by 2023,” Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg, said in a press release. (left-right) ED of The Global Fund, Peter Sands; Norway’s PM, Erna Solberg The commitment was announced at the Global Citizen festival in New York this past weekend. The move was praised by Peter Sands, executive director of The Global Fund, who said, “Through global solidarity and effective partnerships like Norway’s, we will save millions of lives.” Norway is the 11th largest public donor to the Global Fund and gives the most on a per capita basis. Norway, Ghana and Germany, initiated a project to bring together 12 agencies, including The Global Fund, to accelerate work towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal for “Good Health and Well-being.” This initiative was launched just last week at the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The Global Fund has set a target for raising at least US$14 billion for the next three years, which will be used to fund its mission to “end the epidemics of HIV, tuberculosis and malaria.” As the Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference draws closer, stakeholders cautiously wait for the United States, which contributes about a third of the Fund’s budget, to announce whether they will be increasing their contributions like other donors. So far, the Global Fund claims its partnership has saved over 32 million lives, and expanded access to key preventative services and treatments for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. The Fund estimates that a successful Sixth Replenishment will go towards saving 16 million lives, slashing the mortality rate from HIV, TB, and malaria in half, and building stronger health systems by 2023. In addition, every US dollar invested in the Global Fund will have a return in broader economic gains of US$19. Video: Greta Visits The “Pollution Pods” 27/09/2019 Editorial team Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, visits the “Pollution Pods” with Dr. Maria Neira, director of Public Health at the WHO. The “Pollution Pods” allows visitors to experience simulated air pollution levels in different cities around the world, bringing attention to the connection between climate change, air pollution, and respiratory health. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-27-at-9.51.52-AM.mp4 Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Video: Greta Visits The “Pollution Pods” 27/09/2019 Editorial team Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, visits the “Pollution Pods” with Dr. Maria Neira, director of Public Health at the WHO. The “Pollution Pods” allows visitors to experience simulated air pollution levels in different cities around the world, bringing attention to the connection between climate change, air pollution, and respiratory health. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-27-at-9.51.52-AM.mp4 Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts
UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts