Fueling An Unhealthy Future – Report Sheds New Light On Health Costs of Fossil Fuel Subsidies 26/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Globally, governments are spending nearly $US 300 billion in price supports and other pre-tax subsidies for fossil fuels – which are costing national governments a whopping $US 2.7 trillion in health costs from air pollution-related mortality, disease and lost productivity—not to mention fueling climate change. As just one stunning example of these so-called “perverse subsidies”, India spends some US$ 7 billion a year on price supports for coal, diesel and kerosene, which cost the country about 20 times more, or an estimated $US 140.7 billion, in health costs from air pollution-related deaths and disease. Even in the European Union and the United States, fossil fuel subsidies worth over US$ 2 billion cost people and economies in those countries some US$ 200 billion, the analysis found. The data is part of a new paper released Thursday by the New York-based global health organization Vital Strategies and the Geneva-based NCD Alliance. The brief, Fueling an Unhealthy Future, lines up national expenditures on expenditures for the most health-harmful fossil fuels against the costs to economies and health systems incurred on the other end – in terms of air pollution’s health impacts. A student wears a mask to protect him from the smoke that blankets the city of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. While comparisons of global fossil fuel subsidies and associated global health costs have been made in the past by the International Monetary Fund, among others, this new analysis, the pre-release of a larger technical report, brings the issue down to the level of impacts at country level. By comparing fuel subsidies directly with health costs associated with air pollution, as well as with health system budgets, it casts into sharp relief the level of losses countries and societies incur. The study also limits the analysis very conservatively to direct subsidies provided by governments to the most health-harmful fossil fuels – such as coal, kerosene and diesel/gasoline – excluding liquified petroleum gas (LPG) which is regarded by many health advocates as an important “transition fuel” for poor households’ energy needs in low and middle-income countries. The result is a granular, country-by- country comparison that starkly portrays the out-sized health costs associated with policies that artificially reduce fossil fuel prices, encouraging their use. This sheds a new perspective on what one of the lead authors of the report, Nandita Murukutla, describes as the “perverse incentives” of fossil fuel subsidies. Murukutla spoke at a Vital Talks side event Thursday on the margins of this year’s 74th United Nations General Assembly – where global leaders this week announced a new round of commitments to climate action, as well as approving a landmark declaration on achieving worldwide Universal Health Coverage by 2030. In low- and lower-middle income countries such as India, China and Russia – the estimated health costs attributable to fossil fuel subsidies also are more than five times the entire national government health expenditure, she pointed out. “We are incentivizing unhealthy industries that will sicken millions and cost trillions,” said Murukutla. “We call these incentives perverse because they go against health and wellbeing. We cannot be incentivizing these industries and then bearing the health costs. We are calling for more policy coherence.” WHO estimates that some 7 million people a year die from air pollution related risks – and most of those deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and respiratory diseases. At the same time, NCDs now comprise the lion’s share of the global disease burden – responsible for some 71% of premature deaths and diseases. NCDs are also the elephant in the room when it comes to financing universal health coverage. The challenge is huge for low- and middle-income governments that are struggling to cover the very basics such as maternal and child care and immunizations – and it is also affecting more affluent countries that face rising costs from expensive cancer and cardiovascular treatment procedures. Health Taxes on Sugary Drinks, Tobacco, Alcohol Faced with such a funding gap, global health leaders have recently begun to express much stronger backing for so-called “sin taxes”, also called “health taxes”, that can be applied to sugary drinks, tobacco and alcohol to both reduce consumption and raise revenues for health systems. These are taxes that civil society groups such as the NCD Alliance and Vital Strategies have long championing already for some years as effective strategies in shaping consumer demands and preventing NCDs An article Wednesday in The Financial Times, co-authored by the heads of the The Global Fund, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the World Bank’s Global Financing Facility, said that taxing products harmful to health such as tobacco, alcohol or highly-sugared drinks, could be a potentially “valuable contribution” to achieving UHC. “They have the double benefit of suppressing the consumption of harmful products and providing incremental government revenues,” said the op-ed, by Peter Sands, Muhammad Ali Pate and Seth Berkley, whose agencies together provide about US$10 billion in health aid to the world’s poorest countries and communities. WHO’s leadership is also getting on the alcohol-tobacco-sugary drinks bandwagon: “Increasing taxes on alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks can help improve health while improving health systems,” declared WHO’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a brief appearance at Thursday’s Vital Talks side event. However, none of the big agency heads have spoken out in the same way about fuel subsidies. For health advocates, confronting the ways in which fossil fuel subsidies are also fueling deaths and disease is still a relatively new, and edgy topic – which has generally been regarded as a topic of the climate sector. However, even if this year’s Climate Summit failed to see the level of dramatic new country commitments that advocates say are needed to limit global warming to 1.5 C, it has seen a paradigm shift where climate change is being framed in the context of a much broader range of issues. These include air pollution, foods and biodiversity, oceans’ health and sea level-rise, where climate-related health impacts are being examined through a lens of greater complexity – and linkages more widely acknowledged. Another new report, Burning Problems, Inspiring Solutions, released last week by the NCD Alliance and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) calls on governments to fight air pollution from fossil fuels with some of the same strategies that have been used in the past to fight the tobacco industry. Advocates from the two sectors, tobacco and air pollution, have much to learn from each other, said NCD Alliance Policy and Advocacy director Nina Renshaw, a co-author of the report. “So why not draw lessons from the action against tobacco smoking to regulate fossil fuels?” she asks. The report cites case studies of action on tobacco control, and points to lessons for health advocates regarding strategies to: Name and address fossil fuels as a root cause of air pollution-related health issues; Promote subsidy reform, taxation and regulatory measures to curb fossil fuels’ production and use; Define fair transition plans away from unhealthy commodities – recognizing that there are consumers and industry workers dependent on oil, gas and coal. In the health arena, however, the air pollution-fossil fuel-health nexus remains an more edgy one – more so even than taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol, and tobacco. And even proponents acknowledge that raising taxes or reducing longstanding subsidies can encounter significant resistance in the halls of government as well as from industry and consumers who can perceive measures as limiting personal choice and freedoms. For now, despite the mounting evidence around climate, air pollution and health linkages, mainstream NCD prevention strategies remain overwhelmingly focused on personal management strategies, such as reducing salt reduction for hypertension management and less sugar intake for diabetes control. Asked what steps could be taken to advance the health arguments for reducing fuel subsidies to a more central place on policymakers’ agendas, Kelly Henning of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Public Health programme, noted that the philanthropy funds work on both issues, and yet connecting the dots remains a challenge. “It’s going to be quite difficult,” she acknowledged. “I don’t think we have quite figured that all out.” (left-right) Nandita Murukutla, VP, Vital Strategies; Douglas Webb, Team Leader, Health and Development at UNDP; Dr. Kelly Henning, Lead of Global Health Programs, Bloomberg Philanthropies; José Luis Castro, President and CEO, Vital Strategies; Her Royal Highness Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, President of the Union for International Cancer Control; Nina Renshaw, Director of Policy and Advocacy, NCD Alliance. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR , Vital Strategies, E Fletcher/HP-Watch. 12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Climate Summit Garners Modest Commitments On Clean Air, Foods, Oceans & Coal Phase-Out 23/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Monday’s long-awaited United Nations Climate Summit produced no dramatic surprises, but a long list of modest commitments offered a glimmer of a way forward. Government leaders, CEOs, and heads of major philanthropies announced a string of new initiatives to clean up the air, restore oceans, advance more sustainable food systems, phase out coal, plant forests, protect small island states, and better align trade rules with climate goals. Leaders of the planet’s two most polluting nations, China and the United States, were absent from the summit stage – although US President Donald Trump, who has said he would withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, made a brief, unannounced appearance in the audience during the morning’s remarks by India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, before heading to a meeting on religious freedom. Chinese president President Xi Jinping sent a representative who recited an impressive litany of Chinese innovations in areas such as renewable energy and e-transport, but stepped gingerly around the debate over controversial new projects such as China’s massive Belt and Road project through Asia, which critics say could stimulate new sources of climate emissions. A cluster of new initiatives by businesses, philanthropies and governments, however, offered at least some new directions and fresh models for stepping up action on climate drivers that are undermining the fundamental requirements of life on earth – as well as damaging health more visibly than ever before. Opening ceremony of the Climate Action Summit. Those announcements included the launch of a new US$50 million “Clean Air Fund” by a number of leading philanthropies and a “One Planet Business for Biodiversity” initiative led by the corporate giant Danone – which aims to restructure food systems that have “broken the cycle of life” in the words of Danone CEO Emmanuel Faber. Over 40 countries and 70 cities signed a Summit commitment to a WHO Clean Air Initiative to reduce air pollution from sources that also drive climate change by 2030. Together those clean air commitments represent some 750 million people worldwide, WHO sources told Health Policy Watch. Some 60 countries at the Summit pledged to reach net zero climate emissions by 2050, so as to keep average temperature rise below 1.5 C, although climate scientists have warned that even at that level, impacts could still be severe and unpredictable. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, founder and head of Bloomberg Philanthropies, declared that his massive foundation would accelerate its “Beyond Coal” initiative to ensure that “no new coal plants” would be built anywhere in the world after 2020, and those already constructed would be phased out. French President Emmanuel Macron spoke of the critical need to harmonize trade rules with climate goals – a clear reference to the fact that global trade now incentivizes a carbon-intensive global economy based on the long-distance transport of many goods. And among a range of green finance initiatives, the insurance giant Allianz committed to net zero emissions for its investment portfolios of some US$2.4 trillion. Parts of the Solomon Islands are submerged by rising sea levels. Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg said that her country would step up ocean-based climate initiatives, which could reduce global emissions by as much as 20%, generate sustainable energy and ensure sustainability of ocean based food sources. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan, as well as the leaders of Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, laid out ambitious plans for reforesting vast swathes of their countries. Indonesian and DRC rain forests comprise the green lungs for much of South-East Asia and Africa, their leaders noted. And in the case of Pakistan, forests could help sustain the Himalayan glacier systems that regulate water supplies for millions of people, Khan said. Small island states, which are most directly affected by climate change, announced initiatives in insurance, finance as well as in coastal ecosystems and fresh water preservation. They included Barbados’ “Roofs to Reefs” initiative, which would “help protect our fresh water resources and vital coastal reefs” which provide a buffer from storms as well as rich grounds for fish breeding and aquatic life. Desperate Cry by Swedish Youth Activist Greta Thunberg sets the Tone Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, passionately appeals to world leaders to take stronger climate actions. The summit began with yet another in a recent series of calls by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to redouble action: “Nature is angry, … and nature is striking back with fury,” Guterres said. He was followed by a desperate and angry cry from the Swedish youth activist Greta Thunberg. She began her remarks saying, “this is all wrong. I shouldn’t be standing here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean… “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. And all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!” cried Thunberg. Clean Air and Healthier Foods Corporate, philanthropic and government leaders repeatedly referred to the cries of youths like Thunberg in their responses, although it was clear that all were groping to provide sufficient robust answers. “We beg you to listen to our youth because they are demanding this regenerative culture, and listen to that inner voice that whispers to us that life is sacred,” said Danone’s Faber, sounding an almost mystical note. “The food system that we have built over the last century is a dead end for the future…. We thought we could engineer the life we needed and kill the rest in the fields… The resulting mono-cropping consequences are standing right in front of us now. We depend for two thirds of our food on this planet on only nine plants today. Some 40% of land is degraded.” (Left to Right) CEO of Danone, Emmanuel Faber; President of Republic of Guatemala, Jimmy Morales; President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Félix Tshisekedi; Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg. Faber said that the “One Planet” business coalition of 20 of the world’s largest food and agro-based companies representing some US$500 billion in sales would work to restore soil health with regenerative agricultural practices; create consumer demand for more varieties of crops; rein in agro-based deforestation; and put “nature-based solutions at the heart of our strategies and our priorities.” But he added that government agricultural subsidies also need a major overhaul so as to shift farm incentives from “killing life” to protecting biodiversity. Meanwhile, Jane Burston, Executive Director of the Clean Air Fund, said that the new initiative would tackle air pollution that kills some 7 million people annually, transforming it into an “opportunity to not only save millions of lives but to avert dangerous climate change. “I want you to imagine what that means for a second. Imagine the families losing a parent to lung cancer …the schoolgirl gulping for air on the roadside because of an asthma attack brought on by traffic pollution …the baby whose brain and lungs will never develop properly because of the air his mother could not avoid breathing, And many millions more are living with chronic conditions caused and exacerbated by air pollution. “This is a public health emergency, and it is getting worse,” said Burston. She added that since “the causes of climate change are often the same as the causes of air pollution – two thirds of outdoor air pollution is from burning fossil fuels – like coal – for power, transport and industry. The solutions can also be the same: renewable energy, electric mobility, more walking and cycling.” And in economic terms, she cited World Bank and OECD data saying that cleaner air would save trillions of dollars every year in avoided health costs that drag down economic productivity. Jane Burston announcing the launch of the Clean Air Fund. Burston said that the US $50 million in clean air commitments was halfway to its target of US$ 100 million that the Fund hopes to recruit. The initiative is backed by IKEA Foundation, Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, Oak Foundation, Bernard van Leer Foundation, FIA Foundation and the Guys and St Thomas’s Charity. “I urge the leaders gathered here today to respond to the World Health Organisation’s call to action, and to put tackling air pollution at the top of your agenda, because clean air is a human right and together we can make it a human reality,” added Burston. “The real cost of carbon is felt in our lungs,” said WHO’s Maria Neira in an op-ed published Monday in The BMJ. But it is also felt in national economies, she added, noting that air pollution’s health impacts cost OECD economies on average 4% of their annual GDP, and close to 10% for some countries in Asia. The countries and cities that joined WHO’s Clean Air initiative, led by Spain and Peru, would aim to reach WHO air quality guidelines by 2030, in the context of the Climate Summit’s social and political track of commitments. Certainly the ears of many delegates in the hall were ringing throughout the day with words of Thunberg, who in the close of her remarks had said, “The eyes of all future generations are upon you. And if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now is where we draw the line. The world is waking up. And change is coming, whether you like it or not.” Whether her words will echo further in the coming weeks and months remains to be seen. Youth climate activists protest outside the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative’s closed-door meeting, held the day before the UN Climate Action Summit. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Updated 24 September, 2019 Image Credits: UN Photo/Cia Pak, UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe, Thelma Young/350.org. Progress On Universal Health Coverage Lagging: WHO Report Released Ahead Of High Level UHC Meeting 22/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – Despite advances in Universal Health Coverage (UHC), as many as 5 billion people would be left without full access to healthcare in 2030 at the present rate of progress, according to a new report led by the World Health Organization. And financial protections that shield families from catastrophic health expenses have been eroded in some countries, says the report, released just ahead of Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC here at UN Headquarters. The Universal Health Coverage Global Monitoring Report 2019 calls on governments to redouble the pace of expanding coverage, and commit to spending at least 1% of their GDP on primary health care. The report was published just ahead of Monday’s expected adoption of a UN political declaration on UHC, committing UN member states to ensure that people worldwide can access quality healthcare affordably by 2030. “Despite the progress, UHC coverage is stalled or not on track, and only about half the world population will be covered in 2030. Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate, and we need to double the coverage in order to reach the target of UHC for all by 2030,” said Samira Asma, WHO Assistant Director-General for Data, Analytics and Delivery, in a press briefing last week, just ahead of the start of the 74th UN General Assembly, where the UHC High Level Meeting is taking place. People wait in line for medical consultations in Bamako, Mali. The report was prepared by the WHO with contributions from the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations Population Fund, and UNICEF. The report was released today. Primary health care is another key focus of the report’s findings. “Investing an additional US$ 200 billion a year on scaling up primary health care across low and middle-income countries would potentially save 60 million lives, increase average life expectancy by 3.7 years by 2030, and contribute significantly to socio-economic development,” WHO said in a press release. “It would represent a 5% increase on the US$ 7.5 trillion already spent on health globally each year.” The 163-page report filled with the latest-available data and analysis shows an increase in the “UHC service coverage index” (SCI) measuring progress on SDG indicator 3.8.1 (financial protection and coverage of essential health services). The SCI rose from a global average of 45 (of 100) in 2000 to 66 in 2017, and all regions and income groups recorded gains, according to the report. “This level of political commitment is more welcome than ever because it is essential on two fronts: first, to accelerate progress in areas where we have seen improvements; and second, to remove the barriers that are slowing down access to services in some countries and among certain populations,” WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in the report, referring to the High Level Meeting on UHC. According to the report, “Progress has been greatest in lower income countries, mainly driven by interventions for infectious diseases and, to less extent, for reproductive, maternal, new-born and child health services. But the poorest countries and those affected by conflict generally lag far behind.” But the pace of progress on UHC has slowed since 2010. Based on current trends, by 2030 only 39%- 63% of the global population would be covered for essential health services, the report projects. “Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate – and coverage needs to double – to reach the SDG target of UHC for all by 2030.” In addition, levels of catastrophic health expenditures (SDG indicator 3.8.2), which represent out-of-pocket spending in proportion to household income, rose continuously from 2000 to 2015. Nearly a billion people spent more than 10% of household income on health in 2015, and over 200 million spent more than 25%, the report found. Experts Speak on Report, High Level Meeting The report comes against a backdrop of a UN General Assembly where the UHC meeting is a key highlight, said WHO officials. In fact, this may be the first time the UN General Assembly has spent so much of its session on health and health-related climate issues, said WHO Chief of Staff Bernhard Schwartlander at last week’s press briefing. “I think it is clear health is at the core of the Sustainable Development Agenda,” Schwartlander said. “In many ways, it’s a docking station for development overall for many other of the Development Goals, and UHC in a sense brings it all together.” “The good news is that all around the world, across all income groups, health service coverage is improving, has improved in this time period. Unfortunately, the rate of progress is declining, in relation to issues such as non-communicable diseases, limitations in health systems, and the fact that the group of lower income countries are falling tragically behind,” Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, told reporters. Reaching the “Natural Limit” of the Previous Global Health Model? “In many ways, we may have reached the natural limit of our previous global health model,” he said. “We see what is left in terms of coverage are some of the hardest countries – fragile states in particular – the poorest and most vulnerable, and also some of the hardest to reach people within countries: the rural poor, the peri-urban poor, for example,” he added. On financial hardship, on one hand the world is getting richer, and overall poverty rates are declining, he said. But poverty related to health care expenditure is actually increasing. “So the improvements in service coverage are coming at a real cost to individuals and their families,” said Salama. “This cost is measured by out-of-pocket expenditures, which are increasing. One way we measure that is catastrophic expenditures, households that are spending over 10% or 25% of their overall income or consumption on basic health care. And they are both increasing.” Both of these problems can be addressed by universal health coverage, the “cornerstone” of UHC as argued in the report, said Salama. On the price tag for UHC, he said, “Even though it seems like a large sum, we know that most countries can afford to do this based on their domestic resources. Only a handful of countries require international aid in order to scale up their primary health care.” “If we do this, we will have up to 5 billion more people receiving UHC by 2030, and will save up to 100 million lives,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said that “a lot of good progress has been made,” but added that “it is quite shocking” to see the increasing number of people who are at risk of poverty due to health spending. “And even in high-income countries where we have the lowest exposure to such risks, there has been a growth in the share and the number of people who spend large proportions of their household budgets on health. The out-of-pocket expenditures are mainly for pharmaceuticals and out-patient care, she said. While high-income countries score better overall in terms of access to services, there remain many important gaps, she said, particularly in relation to preventative services, especially for the poorest. And there are inequalities which persist, such as at-risk women not getting breast cancer screenings. “Make the Last Mile the First Mile” Speaking at the same press briefing, Stefan Swartling Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, stressed the importance of primary health care as a cornerstone of universal coverage. “As a parent, what I need whether I’m rich or poor is local access to good quality health services that I can afford. That service is primary health care, it’s not the big expensive hospital which is far away,” he said, adding that primary health care (PHC) can take care of 80-90% of a country’s healthcare needs. “My message is that we need to make the last mile [to the household door] the first mile,” Peterson said. PHC is the pathway to reach UHC, and it is “very exciting,” he said to see the digital innovations that can deliver PHC more effectively. “This is really the cutting edge of health care delivery.” Muhammad Pate, Global Director for Health, Nutrition and Population at the World Bank, stressed that UHC is key to human capital accumulation. It drives labour mobility, job creation, and also mitigates the risk of pandemics and other health emergencies, he said. While primary health care is the cornerstone for UHC, it needs to include access to essential drugs, he said, noting that costly drugs are a key driver of catastrophic health expenses. And such access needs to include not only drugs to treat common infectious diseases and maternal health conditions, but also the most prevalent NCDs, including mental health conditions. On financial protection, Pate said increasing domestic resources is necessary but it is not sufficient by itself to improve financial protection. How domestic resources are organized is key, he said. The World Bank is working with over 100 countries to leverage investments toward UHC, and progress needs to be accelerated. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, focused on areas where there are gaps in data and in services, the first being maternal/newborn/children health, where he noted that low-income countries continue to suffer from high rates of maternal and child mortality. More attention is needed to areas such as reproductive health, as well as to exploring why some women don’t use maternal/newborn or reproductive health services, due to social and gender concerns. “The improvements will be accelerated if we pay attention to the human rights of girls and women to make decisions over their own bodies and strategically,” he said. Kalasa also mentioned the “population dynamic” placing a burden on health systems as the global population is expected to reach 8.5 billion by 2030 and will also be changing in terms of age, mobility and urbanization. Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC is expected to be filled with grand statements, but it will remain to be seen what concrete commitments are made during this General Assembly, and how they will be implemented going forward. Image Credits: UN Photo/Marco Dormino, WHO. WHO Launches “Clean Air Coalition”; New Clean Air Fund To Be Announced Tomorrow 22/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – WHO said Sunday that it was launching a “Clean Air Coalition” led by the Governments of Spain and Peru, while a group of philanthropic organizations and foundations were poised to launch a new “Clean Air Fund” at Monday’s Climate Summit to spur investment in reducing sources of air pollution, which also contribute to climate change. A factory in the United States emitting smoke into the atmosphere. Some 29 countries and over 50 subnational entities have pledged to join the coalition committed to achieving healthy air quality by 2030, as part of their Climate Summit pledges, said Spain’s Health Minister María Luisa Carcedo, speaking at a WHO-organized side event on Sunday, the day before the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit brings together heads of state. The Clean Air Coalition is also being supported by the UN Secretary General’s Office and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition of UN Environment, said WHO’s Director of Public Health and Environment, Maria Neira. As for the new Clean Air Fund being formally launched tomorrow, Executive Director Jane Burston, said that the fund brings together “a group of like-minded philanthropic foundations” which have recognized that tackling air pollution will have “huge benefits for health as well as for climate.” “Clean Air Fund” launch announced at a WHO-sponsored side event. Burston said that a report being published by the new fund tomorrow surveyed the funding landscape and found that philanthropic investment in air quality initiatives is disproportionately low in comparison to the burden disease caused by air pollution – which is estimated to kill some 7 million people around the world every year. Additionally, the report found that most money is spent only in a few countries – even though WHO estimates that over 90% of people around the world breathe unhealthy air. “As a result of very limited funding on air quality, deaths from outdoor air pollution and ozone alone are forecast to double by 2050… we just cannot let that happen,” Burston said. She said that the new Clean Air Fund aims to support projects that “democratize” air quality data, making knowledge about air quality more widely accessible to large numbers of people in cities, through projects such as the Breathe London project. Breathe London has created a network of mobile sensors that allow children to decide how best to walk to school and parents to identify pollution hot spots. The new Clean Air Fund will also support “ambitious local government action,” Burston added, noting that they were working with cities that are part of the C-40 network to broaden air quality monitoring as well as with Pure Earth on a mapping of potential air quality interventions and documentation of how those support climate and health goals. Although she did not put a dollar amount, more details of the Fund are to be revealed Monday. Observers predicted that it would amount to an investment of tens of millions of dollars in new air quality efforts. Any investment, said Burston, would be starting from the current, “incredibly low base” of financial commitments to better air quality. “We don’t have anywhere the basis that we need to tackle the crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/John Isaac. Thousands “Walk The Talk” At Event To Raise Awareness For Universal Health Coverage 22/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY – Thousands of people attended a Sunday morning walk/run event here in Central Park to raise awareness for Universal Health Coverage, co-hosted by the World Health Organization and the City of New York. The “Walk the Talk: Healthcare for All Challenge” kicks off a week of high-level talks at the 74th United Nations General Assembly, including tomorrow’s long-anticipated High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as well as the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit. Participants mill around Central Park at “Walk the Talk.” “Today we are walking for our own health. But we are also marching to demand health for all,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, at the opening of the event. The event brought together both New York locals, UN officials, and people from all around the world to commit to health and wellness on an individual and global level. Staff from UN offices around the world such as UNICEF, WHO’s Western Pacific Regional Office and Pan-American Health Organization attended the event, and many major global health organizations such as Vital Strategies also showed up to support. A number of world leaders also participated in the fun-run, including the President of Palau, Thomas Remengesau Jr., and Norway’s Minister of Health, Bent Høie. The event was positioned around the larger conversation underway this week at the UN regarding both UHC and action on climate change. Ricky Kej, Grammy-award winning musician, shares the stage with a multicultural ensemble at “Walk the Talk.” Grammy-winning artist and activist Ricky Kej performed at the closing ceremony, raising awareness on climate change and hearing loss in youth. WHO estimates that over 1 billion youth are at risk of hearing loss from unsafe listening devices. Other speakers reiterated the challenges to achieving universal health coverage. “We are not doing enough to safeguard the future of our children, not when there is very little being done when young people reach the age of 10,” said Zoleka Mandela, activist and granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, pointing to gaps in access in healthcare, and neglect of sexual and reproductive health, injuries, and non-communicable diseases on the adolescent health agenda. Zoleka Mandela, granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, calls for a Global Adolescent Summit. Barely 2% of current global health funding is targeted towards adolescent health. Overall, some 51-67% percent of the world’s population does not have access to universal health coverage, according to a new report released today by the World Health Organization. Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former director-general of the WHO and a founding member of the group of statesmen and stateswomen known as “The Elders”, pointed to the United States’ lack of publicly-funded healthcare and urged states to fulfill their responsibilities to “provide effective and comprehensive public health care to all citizens.” European Union Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis gave a rousing speech along similar lines, urging US participants to push for higher health coverage and “make this country great again.” Dr. Tedros ended the event by reiterating that universal health coverage is a “political issue.” “By walking today,” he said, “We are asking our world leaders to honor their commitment on September 2015 when they agreed to achieve universal health coverage for all by 2030.” Image Credits: Gabby Stern/WHO, Ricky Kej, G Ren/HP-Watch. Civil Society Takes Charge On Climate Action As Governments Waver 21/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Youth leaders from around the world clamored for more action on climate change Saturday at a first-ever United Nation’s Youth Climate Summit – even as the actual government commitments lined up for Monday’s formal meeting with heads of state appeared likely fall far short of making the dramatic changes that scientists say would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5° C. Youth activists and the Secretary-General of the UN give opening remarks at the Youth Climate Summit. Sources told Health Policy Watch that some 50 national commitments were due to be announced Monday at the UN Climate Summit. But these would not be sufficient to sharply reduce the pace of climate change that right now has the world heading for 3°C or higher temperatures by the end of the century. That, health experts have warned, would trigger an unprecedented spiral of threats to human health, food security, disease transmission and to the very survival of small island states and coastal communities. (Left to Right) Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC executive secretary, WHO’s Maria Neira, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. Against the dark scientific predictions, Saturday’s assembly was a further reflection of how civil society organizations of all stripes – from climate researchers to public health advocates, students and urban leaders– have been mobilizing to seize initiative where governments have so far failed. On Thursday, a consortium of scientists published The Exponential Roadmap, outlining 36 strategies that could slash greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 if they were scaled up rapidly. These 36 solutions – ranging from solar and wind to electric bikes, commercial shipping and reduced red meat consumption – could “stabilize earth’s temperatures and significantly reduce risks to societies” said the authors of the report by the Future Earth consortium, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. “This is now a race against time, but businesses and even entire industries have made many significant transitions in less than 10 years,” said report author Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of Future Earth, an international research programme, in a press release. Saturday’s Climate Youth Summit also came in the wake of Friday’s historic global climate strike that mobilized 4 million people worldwide, many from youth-led movements, who demanded more accountability from government and industry leaders. “I want the leaders of the world to respect the rights of future generations, respect the right to a habitable planet… We are not insurance policies, We are communities, we are human communities. Is it really too much to ask you to walk the talk?” Kamal Karishma Kumar, a young activist from the island of Fiji, a country threatened by rising sea levels, told the world leaders at the Youth Summit inside UN Headquarters. Youth participants also demanded greater accountability from industry representatives who were present at the Summit. One activist challenged Microsoft’s Chief Environmental Officer, Lucas Jappa, over recent business deals with fossil fuel companies. “If Microsoft is so committed to sustainability, why did Microsoft partner with Chevron and Schlumberger this week to accelerate oil extraction?… Do you care more about profit than you care about us?” she asked. Making new business deals with the fossil fuels industry is an issue that “the entire tech sector and everybody who is living in the world today, which is predicated upon an oil and gas economy, has to answer,” Microsoft’s Jappa responded. “It’s a conversation that we’re having inside the company and it’s one that I think you’ll be hearing more about, both from Microsoft and our peers in the broader tech sector…. Know that Microsoft will be engaging in this dialogue moving forward,” Jappa added. Monday’s Summit Portrayed as a “Beginning” not a “Milestone” The Youth Summit took place against a background of sober recognition that the level of commitment from global leaders moving into Monday’s high-level Climate Action Summit was likely to be muted. And leaders were busy recasting the Monday meeting as the beginning and not the end of the process. “We have 50 commitments, that is not negligible,” said Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “There is nothing in life that is black or white, everything is shades of grey and I am absolutely sure that this [summit] will take us to the next level,” Figueres, now a lead actor in Mission 2020, a partner organisation in the Exponential Roadmap, told Health Policy Watch in a brief interview. Figueres said she had been “inspired and called to account” by young people speaking out at events such as the Youth Summit, “They have said our generation has not done our job – nobody is exempt, everybody has to do something.” UN Secretary-General, António Guterres. The youth movement and leaders such as Greta Thunberg will be remembered as making “the biggest difference” in the climate movement, said Norway’s Environment and Climate Minister, Ola Elvestuen, at the UN meeting. Speaking at today’s Youth Summit event, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, sounded a note of hope. “When I started two years ago… I felt very discouraged in relation to the perspectives about climate action. We were already facing a climate emergency… At the same time, there was an apathy, there was a sense of difficulty in getting people to act.” Now, he said, public sentiment is finally turning around. But asked later by Health Policy Watch if he had “high hopes” that Monday would be a milestone, The Secretary General paused and said only “I have… hopes.” Health Mobilizing More Aggressively Recognizing that climate impacts people’s health can also help motivate climate action, said Thunberg upon a visit to a “Pollution Pods” exhibit on the UN lawn, sponsored by the World Health Organization. The traveling exhibit, by British artist Michael Pinsky, recreates the experience of pollution in five cities of the world, ranging from highly polluted Delhi and Beijing to moderately polluted London and Oslo. Greta Thunberg at WHO’s Pollution Pods exhibit. “If we can connect the climate crisis with air pollution, it is just so connected and we cannot solve one without solving the other,” said Thunberg. WHO has been leading research and policy synthesis on climate and health issues for nearly two decades. Now some of the largest humanitarian and health civil society organizations are speaking up more assertively. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) both issued statements just ahead of the Summit about the urgency of addressing climate change. The International Federation of the Red Cross report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, warned that by 2050 some 200 million people a year will be in need of humanitarian assistance due to climate related events, double today’s level. Costs of responding to humanitarian crises will balloon to USD$20 billion. The global health and humanitarian aid communities are facing a “climate emergency,” said the Executive Director of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, in another statement, issued on Thursday. Vital Strategies, a longtime health actor on tobacco control, NCDs, and traffic injuries has also become active in the climate space (see interview). And dedicated NGOs, such as Health Care without Harm, and the Global Climate and Health Alliance, have also appeared on the scene to address health workers about the urgent health impacts of climate change, as well as to advocate for reducing the climate footprint of the health sector, which is responsible for as much as 4.5% of climate emissions, according to a recent report. New Roadmap Provides 36 Solutions to Cut Climate Emissions 50% by 2030 Worldwide Among scientists, as well, there is a stronger note of activism, as reflected in reports such as the Exponential Roadmap. The report identifies a number of “tipping points” it says could accelerate transformation toward a more sustainable global economy, including: Low cost solar, wind, and battery technologies, which are on profitable, exponential trajectories that if sustained, will be enough to halve emissions from electricity generation by 2030; Electric vehicle growth, which has the potential to reach a 90% market share by 2030 if sustained, but only if strong policies support this direction; Growing social movements changing the public conversation in parallel with companies and cities stepping up climate action; Emerging political support for more ambitious targets, for example countries such as the UK, France, Norway and Sweden adopting laws to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier. Along with that, digital technology could support a rapid transformation of economic systems – although if it is not managed, digital transformation also could drive emissions higher, the report’s authors warn. Of the report, Figueres said, “I see all evidence that social and economic tipping points are aligning. We can now say the next decade has the potential to see the fastest economic transition in history. The 2019 Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for the necessary journey to net-zero emissions.” Manuel Pugal-Vidal, leader of the climate and energy practice at WWF, a partner of the report said in a statement, “Governments must introduce national targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 with targets to cut emissions 50% by 2030. Immediate removal of fossil-fuel subsidies is a priority. Yet policies must be equitable and fair or risk failure.” “Developed nations with significant historic emissions also have a responsibility to reduce emissions faster. Cities and states – not only countries – will also be important change makers,” he adds. More from HPW’s interview with Maria Neira, Christiana Figueres, and Michelle Bachelet: https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.45.40-PM-2.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.57.10-PM.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.53.47-PM.mp4 For more about the story of the “Pollution Pods” see here. Grace Ren also contributed to this story. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, Fletcher/HP-Watch. “We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
12 Agencies Launch Global Action Plan To Speed Work On 2030 SDG Health Goals 24/09/2019 William New A sweeping collaboration among 12 major global health organizations launched today at the United Nations General Assembly, promising to elevate and speed up work to achieve UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, Good Health and Well-Being, by 2030. The event featured remarks by the leaders of Germany, Norway and Ghana, the original initiators of the project. “The plan is a historic commitment by 12 partner agencies working together towards achieving the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all,” Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo told an event with senior officials from the 12 agencies today. Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. The Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All: Strengthening collaboration among multilateral organizations to accelerate country progress on the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, sets out a “joint approach pledged by 12 global health, development and humanitarian agencies to better support governments to deliver on their commitments to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all by 2030.” The World Health Organization is coordinating the work of the 12 organizations including: Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the World Bank and the World Bank-supported Global Financing Facility, The Global Fund, UNAIDS, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank, and the World Food Programme. “The plan launching today is designed to get us back on track,” said WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. All of the partners have unique strengths and a shared commitment, he said, but added, “It’s all about country focus, country priorities.” A WHO press release on the launch is available here. Norway’s Prime Minister Solberg, who fostered the plan together with Germany and Ghana, said that it is a vital tool for accelerating progress on SDG3,” She said the plan would help speed cooperation and avoid duplication of efforts among the 12 agencies involved. “The aim is to coordinate efforts to promote better health, achieve faster results, and enhance accountability,” said Solberg, who noted that much more can be achieved with existing resources if there is better coordination. She highlighted progress made so far on the SDGs but said, “We are not on track to meet the health-related SDGs,” and “there is an urgent need for action.” Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan at UN Headquarters. Efforts to achieve SDG 3, which has nine ambitious targets for 2030, including dramatic reductions in the world’s leading causes of death and disease; universal health coverage; stronger healthcare systems; and healthier environments, must also be more multi-sectoral, she added. “I believe a strong society invests in its citizens,” said Solberg. “The social, political and economic benefits are enormous.” Health-related SDGs should not only be on the agenda of health ministers, it should be on the agenda of all, for instance, it is related to tax systems, finance, and information, she said. “We must do it in coordination with national leadership. We must do more, we must do it differently, and we must do it together.” ‘We Have To Speed Up Progress’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the gathering that partly as a result of the Ebola outbreak in central Africa, Germany had become more focused on how WHO and other health-related UN agencies could work more efficiently together to advance health-related SDG goals. She, along with Akufo-Addo and Solberg, asked the UN agencies to work with other leading health partners on an action plan as to how the SDG3 goal could be attained. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, speaks at the launch of the Global Action Plan. She said the 12 agencies have helped advance the SDGs, and that they have a total of $12.7 billion between them at their disposal, representing some two-thirds of international development assistance overall. With today’s launch, she said, “There is good news now, because the Global Action Plan is actually on track.” Now, Merkel said, “we have to speed up the process, get faster progress” in seven areas of opportunity for accelerated action on the SDGs that have been highlighted by the agencies’ work. The “7 accelerator themes” that are the focus include: primary health care; sustainable financing for health; community and civil society engagement; determinants of health; innovative programming in fragile and vulnerable settings and for disease outbreak responses; research and development, innovation and access; and data and digital health. Across those themes, the plan commits the agencies to four overall goals: engage with countries to better identify priorities and implement; enhance accountability; accelerate progress in countries through joint actions; and align in support of countries by harmonizing operational and financial strategies and policies. Representatives of many other organizations spoke in support of the action plan, some calling for greater attention to the people they represent such as youth, women, and those unable to afford health care. All committed to collaboration. The heads of UNICEF, Global Fund, Gavi, UNFPA, UNAIDS, and others were present and made supportive remarks. Akufo-Addo said, “Good health is fundamental to all we do and hope to do. It is the reason why the right to health is enshrined in Ghana’s constitution.” He said a key challenge to achieving SDG3 is efficient use of resources, which is why he joined with the Norwegian and German leaders to urge the WHO to coordinate this initiative. Merkel added that it is “very important” that all of these actions are not “one size fits all but are tailor-made” so each of these countries feels some ownership. “It is crucial that we take those countries along,” she said, if not it will not be successful. “Once we have an intrinsically logical concept then we ought to help those countries understand,” Merkel said in translation from German. WHO will coordinate the various efforts by groups. “And we need donors who give funding but we also need recipients of this funding who use it sensibly,” she said. “Our task is not finished,” and Germany and Norway will remain committed, she continued. They already have 24 countries in on this, so that means “the acceptance among member states continues to increase,” and they need to have more, she said. Global Action Plan launch at UN Headquarters in New York City. The African Union in a statement on the GAP plan, said, “We believe universal health coverage is within reach, it is not impossible.” But the region will need help with the funding gap, and further work on alignment with international guidelines. Countries have shown they can mobilize some resources for health domestically, she said. Dr Tedros highlighted that the organizations should work in alignment, not duplication, and that the plan would only bring change if implemented at the country level. Quoting an Ethiopian proverb, he said, “When spider webs unite, they can tie up the line,” but when they work individually, “our webs aren’t strong enough.” Leaders of the 12 agencies that launched the Global Action Plan gather at the launch event. Image Credits: Ben Hartschuh, Tom Gallo. UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Climate Summit Garners Modest Commitments On Clean Air, Foods, Oceans & Coal Phase-Out 23/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Monday’s long-awaited United Nations Climate Summit produced no dramatic surprises, but a long list of modest commitments offered a glimmer of a way forward. Government leaders, CEOs, and heads of major philanthropies announced a string of new initiatives to clean up the air, restore oceans, advance more sustainable food systems, phase out coal, plant forests, protect small island states, and better align trade rules with climate goals. Leaders of the planet’s two most polluting nations, China and the United States, were absent from the summit stage – although US President Donald Trump, who has said he would withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, made a brief, unannounced appearance in the audience during the morning’s remarks by India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, before heading to a meeting on religious freedom. Chinese president President Xi Jinping sent a representative who recited an impressive litany of Chinese innovations in areas such as renewable energy and e-transport, but stepped gingerly around the debate over controversial new projects such as China’s massive Belt and Road project through Asia, which critics say could stimulate new sources of climate emissions. A cluster of new initiatives by businesses, philanthropies and governments, however, offered at least some new directions and fresh models for stepping up action on climate drivers that are undermining the fundamental requirements of life on earth – as well as damaging health more visibly than ever before. Opening ceremony of the Climate Action Summit. Those announcements included the launch of a new US$50 million “Clean Air Fund” by a number of leading philanthropies and a “One Planet Business for Biodiversity” initiative led by the corporate giant Danone – which aims to restructure food systems that have “broken the cycle of life” in the words of Danone CEO Emmanuel Faber. Over 40 countries and 70 cities signed a Summit commitment to a WHO Clean Air Initiative to reduce air pollution from sources that also drive climate change by 2030. Together those clean air commitments represent some 750 million people worldwide, WHO sources told Health Policy Watch. Some 60 countries at the Summit pledged to reach net zero climate emissions by 2050, so as to keep average temperature rise below 1.5 C, although climate scientists have warned that even at that level, impacts could still be severe and unpredictable. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, founder and head of Bloomberg Philanthropies, declared that his massive foundation would accelerate its “Beyond Coal” initiative to ensure that “no new coal plants” would be built anywhere in the world after 2020, and those already constructed would be phased out. French President Emmanuel Macron spoke of the critical need to harmonize trade rules with climate goals – a clear reference to the fact that global trade now incentivizes a carbon-intensive global economy based on the long-distance transport of many goods. And among a range of green finance initiatives, the insurance giant Allianz committed to net zero emissions for its investment portfolios of some US$2.4 trillion. Parts of the Solomon Islands are submerged by rising sea levels. Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg said that her country would step up ocean-based climate initiatives, which could reduce global emissions by as much as 20%, generate sustainable energy and ensure sustainability of ocean based food sources. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan, as well as the leaders of Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, laid out ambitious plans for reforesting vast swathes of their countries. Indonesian and DRC rain forests comprise the green lungs for much of South-East Asia and Africa, their leaders noted. And in the case of Pakistan, forests could help sustain the Himalayan glacier systems that regulate water supplies for millions of people, Khan said. Small island states, which are most directly affected by climate change, announced initiatives in insurance, finance as well as in coastal ecosystems and fresh water preservation. They included Barbados’ “Roofs to Reefs” initiative, which would “help protect our fresh water resources and vital coastal reefs” which provide a buffer from storms as well as rich grounds for fish breeding and aquatic life. Desperate Cry by Swedish Youth Activist Greta Thunberg sets the Tone Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, passionately appeals to world leaders to take stronger climate actions. The summit began with yet another in a recent series of calls by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to redouble action: “Nature is angry, … and nature is striking back with fury,” Guterres said. He was followed by a desperate and angry cry from the Swedish youth activist Greta Thunberg. She began her remarks saying, “this is all wrong. I shouldn’t be standing here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean… “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. And all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!” cried Thunberg. Clean Air and Healthier Foods Corporate, philanthropic and government leaders repeatedly referred to the cries of youths like Thunberg in their responses, although it was clear that all were groping to provide sufficient robust answers. “We beg you to listen to our youth because they are demanding this regenerative culture, and listen to that inner voice that whispers to us that life is sacred,” said Danone’s Faber, sounding an almost mystical note. “The food system that we have built over the last century is a dead end for the future…. We thought we could engineer the life we needed and kill the rest in the fields… The resulting mono-cropping consequences are standing right in front of us now. We depend for two thirds of our food on this planet on only nine plants today. Some 40% of land is degraded.” (Left to Right) CEO of Danone, Emmanuel Faber; President of Republic of Guatemala, Jimmy Morales; President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Félix Tshisekedi; Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg. Faber said that the “One Planet” business coalition of 20 of the world’s largest food and agro-based companies representing some US$500 billion in sales would work to restore soil health with regenerative agricultural practices; create consumer demand for more varieties of crops; rein in agro-based deforestation; and put “nature-based solutions at the heart of our strategies and our priorities.” But he added that government agricultural subsidies also need a major overhaul so as to shift farm incentives from “killing life” to protecting biodiversity. Meanwhile, Jane Burston, Executive Director of the Clean Air Fund, said that the new initiative would tackle air pollution that kills some 7 million people annually, transforming it into an “opportunity to not only save millions of lives but to avert dangerous climate change. “I want you to imagine what that means for a second. Imagine the families losing a parent to lung cancer …the schoolgirl gulping for air on the roadside because of an asthma attack brought on by traffic pollution …the baby whose brain and lungs will never develop properly because of the air his mother could not avoid breathing, And many millions more are living with chronic conditions caused and exacerbated by air pollution. “This is a public health emergency, and it is getting worse,” said Burston. She added that since “the causes of climate change are often the same as the causes of air pollution – two thirds of outdoor air pollution is from burning fossil fuels – like coal – for power, transport and industry. The solutions can also be the same: renewable energy, electric mobility, more walking and cycling.” And in economic terms, she cited World Bank and OECD data saying that cleaner air would save trillions of dollars every year in avoided health costs that drag down economic productivity. Jane Burston announcing the launch of the Clean Air Fund. Burston said that the US $50 million in clean air commitments was halfway to its target of US$ 100 million that the Fund hopes to recruit. The initiative is backed by IKEA Foundation, Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, Oak Foundation, Bernard van Leer Foundation, FIA Foundation and the Guys and St Thomas’s Charity. “I urge the leaders gathered here today to respond to the World Health Organisation’s call to action, and to put tackling air pollution at the top of your agenda, because clean air is a human right and together we can make it a human reality,” added Burston. “The real cost of carbon is felt in our lungs,” said WHO’s Maria Neira in an op-ed published Monday in The BMJ. But it is also felt in national economies, she added, noting that air pollution’s health impacts cost OECD economies on average 4% of their annual GDP, and close to 10% for some countries in Asia. The countries and cities that joined WHO’s Clean Air initiative, led by Spain and Peru, would aim to reach WHO air quality guidelines by 2030, in the context of the Climate Summit’s social and political track of commitments. Certainly the ears of many delegates in the hall were ringing throughout the day with words of Thunberg, who in the close of her remarks had said, “The eyes of all future generations are upon you. And if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now is where we draw the line. The world is waking up. And change is coming, whether you like it or not.” Whether her words will echo further in the coming weeks and months remains to be seen. Youth climate activists protest outside the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative’s closed-door meeting, held the day before the UN Climate Action Summit. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Updated 24 September, 2019 Image Credits: UN Photo/Cia Pak, UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe, Thelma Young/350.org. Progress On Universal Health Coverage Lagging: WHO Report Released Ahead Of High Level UHC Meeting 22/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – Despite advances in Universal Health Coverage (UHC), as many as 5 billion people would be left without full access to healthcare in 2030 at the present rate of progress, according to a new report led by the World Health Organization. And financial protections that shield families from catastrophic health expenses have been eroded in some countries, says the report, released just ahead of Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC here at UN Headquarters. The Universal Health Coverage Global Monitoring Report 2019 calls on governments to redouble the pace of expanding coverage, and commit to spending at least 1% of their GDP on primary health care. The report was published just ahead of Monday’s expected adoption of a UN political declaration on UHC, committing UN member states to ensure that people worldwide can access quality healthcare affordably by 2030. “Despite the progress, UHC coverage is stalled or not on track, and only about half the world population will be covered in 2030. Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate, and we need to double the coverage in order to reach the target of UHC for all by 2030,” said Samira Asma, WHO Assistant Director-General for Data, Analytics and Delivery, in a press briefing last week, just ahead of the start of the 74th UN General Assembly, where the UHC High Level Meeting is taking place. People wait in line for medical consultations in Bamako, Mali. The report was prepared by the WHO with contributions from the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations Population Fund, and UNICEF. The report was released today. Primary health care is another key focus of the report’s findings. “Investing an additional US$ 200 billion a year on scaling up primary health care across low and middle-income countries would potentially save 60 million lives, increase average life expectancy by 3.7 years by 2030, and contribute significantly to socio-economic development,” WHO said in a press release. “It would represent a 5% increase on the US$ 7.5 trillion already spent on health globally each year.” The 163-page report filled with the latest-available data and analysis shows an increase in the “UHC service coverage index” (SCI) measuring progress on SDG indicator 3.8.1 (financial protection and coverage of essential health services). The SCI rose from a global average of 45 (of 100) in 2000 to 66 in 2017, and all regions and income groups recorded gains, according to the report. “This level of political commitment is more welcome than ever because it is essential on two fronts: first, to accelerate progress in areas where we have seen improvements; and second, to remove the barriers that are slowing down access to services in some countries and among certain populations,” WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in the report, referring to the High Level Meeting on UHC. According to the report, “Progress has been greatest in lower income countries, mainly driven by interventions for infectious diseases and, to less extent, for reproductive, maternal, new-born and child health services. But the poorest countries and those affected by conflict generally lag far behind.” But the pace of progress on UHC has slowed since 2010. Based on current trends, by 2030 only 39%- 63% of the global population would be covered for essential health services, the report projects. “Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate – and coverage needs to double – to reach the SDG target of UHC for all by 2030.” In addition, levels of catastrophic health expenditures (SDG indicator 3.8.2), which represent out-of-pocket spending in proportion to household income, rose continuously from 2000 to 2015. Nearly a billion people spent more than 10% of household income on health in 2015, and over 200 million spent more than 25%, the report found. Experts Speak on Report, High Level Meeting The report comes against a backdrop of a UN General Assembly where the UHC meeting is a key highlight, said WHO officials. In fact, this may be the first time the UN General Assembly has spent so much of its session on health and health-related climate issues, said WHO Chief of Staff Bernhard Schwartlander at last week’s press briefing. “I think it is clear health is at the core of the Sustainable Development Agenda,” Schwartlander said. “In many ways, it’s a docking station for development overall for many other of the Development Goals, and UHC in a sense brings it all together.” “The good news is that all around the world, across all income groups, health service coverage is improving, has improved in this time period. Unfortunately, the rate of progress is declining, in relation to issues such as non-communicable diseases, limitations in health systems, and the fact that the group of lower income countries are falling tragically behind,” Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, told reporters. Reaching the “Natural Limit” of the Previous Global Health Model? “In many ways, we may have reached the natural limit of our previous global health model,” he said. “We see what is left in terms of coverage are some of the hardest countries – fragile states in particular – the poorest and most vulnerable, and also some of the hardest to reach people within countries: the rural poor, the peri-urban poor, for example,” he added. On financial hardship, on one hand the world is getting richer, and overall poverty rates are declining, he said. But poverty related to health care expenditure is actually increasing. “So the improvements in service coverage are coming at a real cost to individuals and their families,” said Salama. “This cost is measured by out-of-pocket expenditures, which are increasing. One way we measure that is catastrophic expenditures, households that are spending over 10% or 25% of their overall income or consumption on basic health care. And they are both increasing.” Both of these problems can be addressed by universal health coverage, the “cornerstone” of UHC as argued in the report, said Salama. On the price tag for UHC, he said, “Even though it seems like a large sum, we know that most countries can afford to do this based on their domestic resources. Only a handful of countries require international aid in order to scale up their primary health care.” “If we do this, we will have up to 5 billion more people receiving UHC by 2030, and will save up to 100 million lives,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said that “a lot of good progress has been made,” but added that “it is quite shocking” to see the increasing number of people who are at risk of poverty due to health spending. “And even in high-income countries where we have the lowest exposure to such risks, there has been a growth in the share and the number of people who spend large proportions of their household budgets on health. The out-of-pocket expenditures are mainly for pharmaceuticals and out-patient care, she said. While high-income countries score better overall in terms of access to services, there remain many important gaps, she said, particularly in relation to preventative services, especially for the poorest. And there are inequalities which persist, such as at-risk women not getting breast cancer screenings. “Make the Last Mile the First Mile” Speaking at the same press briefing, Stefan Swartling Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, stressed the importance of primary health care as a cornerstone of universal coverage. “As a parent, what I need whether I’m rich or poor is local access to good quality health services that I can afford. That service is primary health care, it’s not the big expensive hospital which is far away,” he said, adding that primary health care (PHC) can take care of 80-90% of a country’s healthcare needs. “My message is that we need to make the last mile [to the household door] the first mile,” Peterson said. PHC is the pathway to reach UHC, and it is “very exciting,” he said to see the digital innovations that can deliver PHC more effectively. “This is really the cutting edge of health care delivery.” Muhammad Pate, Global Director for Health, Nutrition and Population at the World Bank, stressed that UHC is key to human capital accumulation. It drives labour mobility, job creation, and also mitigates the risk of pandemics and other health emergencies, he said. While primary health care is the cornerstone for UHC, it needs to include access to essential drugs, he said, noting that costly drugs are a key driver of catastrophic health expenses. And such access needs to include not only drugs to treat common infectious diseases and maternal health conditions, but also the most prevalent NCDs, including mental health conditions. On financial protection, Pate said increasing domestic resources is necessary but it is not sufficient by itself to improve financial protection. How domestic resources are organized is key, he said. The World Bank is working with over 100 countries to leverage investments toward UHC, and progress needs to be accelerated. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, focused on areas where there are gaps in data and in services, the first being maternal/newborn/children health, where he noted that low-income countries continue to suffer from high rates of maternal and child mortality. More attention is needed to areas such as reproductive health, as well as to exploring why some women don’t use maternal/newborn or reproductive health services, due to social and gender concerns. “The improvements will be accelerated if we pay attention to the human rights of girls and women to make decisions over their own bodies and strategically,” he said. Kalasa also mentioned the “population dynamic” placing a burden on health systems as the global population is expected to reach 8.5 billion by 2030 and will also be changing in terms of age, mobility and urbanization. Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC is expected to be filled with grand statements, but it will remain to be seen what concrete commitments are made during this General Assembly, and how they will be implemented going forward. Image Credits: UN Photo/Marco Dormino, WHO. WHO Launches “Clean Air Coalition”; New Clean Air Fund To Be Announced Tomorrow 22/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – WHO said Sunday that it was launching a “Clean Air Coalition” led by the Governments of Spain and Peru, while a group of philanthropic organizations and foundations were poised to launch a new “Clean Air Fund” at Monday’s Climate Summit to spur investment in reducing sources of air pollution, which also contribute to climate change. A factory in the United States emitting smoke into the atmosphere. Some 29 countries and over 50 subnational entities have pledged to join the coalition committed to achieving healthy air quality by 2030, as part of their Climate Summit pledges, said Spain’s Health Minister María Luisa Carcedo, speaking at a WHO-organized side event on Sunday, the day before the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit brings together heads of state. The Clean Air Coalition is also being supported by the UN Secretary General’s Office and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition of UN Environment, said WHO’s Director of Public Health and Environment, Maria Neira. As for the new Clean Air Fund being formally launched tomorrow, Executive Director Jane Burston, said that the fund brings together “a group of like-minded philanthropic foundations” which have recognized that tackling air pollution will have “huge benefits for health as well as for climate.” “Clean Air Fund” launch announced at a WHO-sponsored side event. Burston said that a report being published by the new fund tomorrow surveyed the funding landscape and found that philanthropic investment in air quality initiatives is disproportionately low in comparison to the burden disease caused by air pollution – which is estimated to kill some 7 million people around the world every year. Additionally, the report found that most money is spent only in a few countries – even though WHO estimates that over 90% of people around the world breathe unhealthy air. “As a result of very limited funding on air quality, deaths from outdoor air pollution and ozone alone are forecast to double by 2050… we just cannot let that happen,” Burston said. She said that the new Clean Air Fund aims to support projects that “democratize” air quality data, making knowledge about air quality more widely accessible to large numbers of people in cities, through projects such as the Breathe London project. Breathe London has created a network of mobile sensors that allow children to decide how best to walk to school and parents to identify pollution hot spots. The new Clean Air Fund will also support “ambitious local government action,” Burston added, noting that they were working with cities that are part of the C-40 network to broaden air quality monitoring as well as with Pure Earth on a mapping of potential air quality interventions and documentation of how those support climate and health goals. Although she did not put a dollar amount, more details of the Fund are to be revealed Monday. Observers predicted that it would amount to an investment of tens of millions of dollars in new air quality efforts. Any investment, said Burston, would be starting from the current, “incredibly low base” of financial commitments to better air quality. “We don’t have anywhere the basis that we need to tackle the crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/John Isaac. Thousands “Walk The Talk” At Event To Raise Awareness For Universal Health Coverage 22/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY – Thousands of people attended a Sunday morning walk/run event here in Central Park to raise awareness for Universal Health Coverage, co-hosted by the World Health Organization and the City of New York. The “Walk the Talk: Healthcare for All Challenge” kicks off a week of high-level talks at the 74th United Nations General Assembly, including tomorrow’s long-anticipated High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as well as the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit. Participants mill around Central Park at “Walk the Talk.” “Today we are walking for our own health. But we are also marching to demand health for all,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, at the opening of the event. The event brought together both New York locals, UN officials, and people from all around the world to commit to health and wellness on an individual and global level. Staff from UN offices around the world such as UNICEF, WHO’s Western Pacific Regional Office and Pan-American Health Organization attended the event, and many major global health organizations such as Vital Strategies also showed up to support. A number of world leaders also participated in the fun-run, including the President of Palau, Thomas Remengesau Jr., and Norway’s Minister of Health, Bent Høie. The event was positioned around the larger conversation underway this week at the UN regarding both UHC and action on climate change. Ricky Kej, Grammy-award winning musician, shares the stage with a multicultural ensemble at “Walk the Talk.” Grammy-winning artist and activist Ricky Kej performed at the closing ceremony, raising awareness on climate change and hearing loss in youth. WHO estimates that over 1 billion youth are at risk of hearing loss from unsafe listening devices. Other speakers reiterated the challenges to achieving universal health coverage. “We are not doing enough to safeguard the future of our children, not when there is very little being done when young people reach the age of 10,” said Zoleka Mandela, activist and granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, pointing to gaps in access in healthcare, and neglect of sexual and reproductive health, injuries, and non-communicable diseases on the adolescent health agenda. Zoleka Mandela, granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, calls for a Global Adolescent Summit. Barely 2% of current global health funding is targeted towards adolescent health. Overall, some 51-67% percent of the world’s population does not have access to universal health coverage, according to a new report released today by the World Health Organization. Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former director-general of the WHO and a founding member of the group of statesmen and stateswomen known as “The Elders”, pointed to the United States’ lack of publicly-funded healthcare and urged states to fulfill their responsibilities to “provide effective and comprehensive public health care to all citizens.” European Union Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis gave a rousing speech along similar lines, urging US participants to push for higher health coverage and “make this country great again.” Dr. Tedros ended the event by reiterating that universal health coverage is a “political issue.” “By walking today,” he said, “We are asking our world leaders to honor their commitment on September 2015 when they agreed to achieve universal health coverage for all by 2030.” Image Credits: Gabby Stern/WHO, Ricky Kej, G Ren/HP-Watch. Civil Society Takes Charge On Climate Action As Governments Waver 21/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Youth leaders from around the world clamored for more action on climate change Saturday at a first-ever United Nation’s Youth Climate Summit – even as the actual government commitments lined up for Monday’s formal meeting with heads of state appeared likely fall far short of making the dramatic changes that scientists say would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5° C. Youth activists and the Secretary-General of the UN give opening remarks at the Youth Climate Summit. Sources told Health Policy Watch that some 50 national commitments were due to be announced Monday at the UN Climate Summit. But these would not be sufficient to sharply reduce the pace of climate change that right now has the world heading for 3°C or higher temperatures by the end of the century. That, health experts have warned, would trigger an unprecedented spiral of threats to human health, food security, disease transmission and to the very survival of small island states and coastal communities. (Left to Right) Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC executive secretary, WHO’s Maria Neira, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. Against the dark scientific predictions, Saturday’s assembly was a further reflection of how civil society organizations of all stripes – from climate researchers to public health advocates, students and urban leaders– have been mobilizing to seize initiative where governments have so far failed. On Thursday, a consortium of scientists published The Exponential Roadmap, outlining 36 strategies that could slash greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 if they were scaled up rapidly. These 36 solutions – ranging from solar and wind to electric bikes, commercial shipping and reduced red meat consumption – could “stabilize earth’s temperatures and significantly reduce risks to societies” said the authors of the report by the Future Earth consortium, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. “This is now a race against time, but businesses and even entire industries have made many significant transitions in less than 10 years,” said report author Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of Future Earth, an international research programme, in a press release. Saturday’s Climate Youth Summit also came in the wake of Friday’s historic global climate strike that mobilized 4 million people worldwide, many from youth-led movements, who demanded more accountability from government and industry leaders. “I want the leaders of the world to respect the rights of future generations, respect the right to a habitable planet… We are not insurance policies, We are communities, we are human communities. Is it really too much to ask you to walk the talk?” Kamal Karishma Kumar, a young activist from the island of Fiji, a country threatened by rising sea levels, told the world leaders at the Youth Summit inside UN Headquarters. Youth participants also demanded greater accountability from industry representatives who were present at the Summit. One activist challenged Microsoft’s Chief Environmental Officer, Lucas Jappa, over recent business deals with fossil fuel companies. “If Microsoft is so committed to sustainability, why did Microsoft partner with Chevron and Schlumberger this week to accelerate oil extraction?… Do you care more about profit than you care about us?” she asked. Making new business deals with the fossil fuels industry is an issue that “the entire tech sector and everybody who is living in the world today, which is predicated upon an oil and gas economy, has to answer,” Microsoft’s Jappa responded. “It’s a conversation that we’re having inside the company and it’s one that I think you’ll be hearing more about, both from Microsoft and our peers in the broader tech sector…. Know that Microsoft will be engaging in this dialogue moving forward,” Jappa added. Monday’s Summit Portrayed as a “Beginning” not a “Milestone” The Youth Summit took place against a background of sober recognition that the level of commitment from global leaders moving into Monday’s high-level Climate Action Summit was likely to be muted. And leaders were busy recasting the Monday meeting as the beginning and not the end of the process. “We have 50 commitments, that is not negligible,” said Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “There is nothing in life that is black or white, everything is shades of grey and I am absolutely sure that this [summit] will take us to the next level,” Figueres, now a lead actor in Mission 2020, a partner organisation in the Exponential Roadmap, told Health Policy Watch in a brief interview. Figueres said she had been “inspired and called to account” by young people speaking out at events such as the Youth Summit, “They have said our generation has not done our job – nobody is exempt, everybody has to do something.” UN Secretary-General, António Guterres. The youth movement and leaders such as Greta Thunberg will be remembered as making “the biggest difference” in the climate movement, said Norway’s Environment and Climate Minister, Ola Elvestuen, at the UN meeting. Speaking at today’s Youth Summit event, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, sounded a note of hope. “When I started two years ago… I felt very discouraged in relation to the perspectives about climate action. We were already facing a climate emergency… At the same time, there was an apathy, there was a sense of difficulty in getting people to act.” Now, he said, public sentiment is finally turning around. But asked later by Health Policy Watch if he had “high hopes” that Monday would be a milestone, The Secretary General paused and said only “I have… hopes.” Health Mobilizing More Aggressively Recognizing that climate impacts people’s health can also help motivate climate action, said Thunberg upon a visit to a “Pollution Pods” exhibit on the UN lawn, sponsored by the World Health Organization. The traveling exhibit, by British artist Michael Pinsky, recreates the experience of pollution in five cities of the world, ranging from highly polluted Delhi and Beijing to moderately polluted London and Oslo. Greta Thunberg at WHO’s Pollution Pods exhibit. “If we can connect the climate crisis with air pollution, it is just so connected and we cannot solve one without solving the other,” said Thunberg. WHO has been leading research and policy synthesis on climate and health issues for nearly two decades. Now some of the largest humanitarian and health civil society organizations are speaking up more assertively. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) both issued statements just ahead of the Summit about the urgency of addressing climate change. The International Federation of the Red Cross report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, warned that by 2050 some 200 million people a year will be in need of humanitarian assistance due to climate related events, double today’s level. Costs of responding to humanitarian crises will balloon to USD$20 billion. The global health and humanitarian aid communities are facing a “climate emergency,” said the Executive Director of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, in another statement, issued on Thursday. Vital Strategies, a longtime health actor on tobacco control, NCDs, and traffic injuries has also become active in the climate space (see interview). And dedicated NGOs, such as Health Care without Harm, and the Global Climate and Health Alliance, have also appeared on the scene to address health workers about the urgent health impacts of climate change, as well as to advocate for reducing the climate footprint of the health sector, which is responsible for as much as 4.5% of climate emissions, according to a recent report. New Roadmap Provides 36 Solutions to Cut Climate Emissions 50% by 2030 Worldwide Among scientists, as well, there is a stronger note of activism, as reflected in reports such as the Exponential Roadmap. The report identifies a number of “tipping points” it says could accelerate transformation toward a more sustainable global economy, including: Low cost solar, wind, and battery technologies, which are on profitable, exponential trajectories that if sustained, will be enough to halve emissions from electricity generation by 2030; Electric vehicle growth, which has the potential to reach a 90% market share by 2030 if sustained, but only if strong policies support this direction; Growing social movements changing the public conversation in parallel with companies and cities stepping up climate action; Emerging political support for more ambitious targets, for example countries such as the UK, France, Norway and Sweden adopting laws to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier. Along with that, digital technology could support a rapid transformation of economic systems – although if it is not managed, digital transformation also could drive emissions higher, the report’s authors warn. Of the report, Figueres said, “I see all evidence that social and economic tipping points are aligning. We can now say the next decade has the potential to see the fastest economic transition in history. The 2019 Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for the necessary journey to net-zero emissions.” Manuel Pugal-Vidal, leader of the climate and energy practice at WWF, a partner of the report said in a statement, “Governments must introduce national targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 with targets to cut emissions 50% by 2030. Immediate removal of fossil-fuel subsidies is a priority. Yet policies must be equitable and fair or risk failure.” “Developed nations with significant historic emissions also have a responsibility to reduce emissions faster. Cities and states – not only countries – will also be important change makers,” he adds. More from HPW’s interview with Maria Neira, Christiana Figueres, and Michelle Bachelet: https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.45.40-PM-2.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.57.10-PM.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.53.47-PM.mp4 For more about the story of the “Pollution Pods” see here. Grace Ren also contributed to this story. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, Fletcher/HP-Watch. “We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
UN Adopts Political Declaration On Health Coverage For All – Financing A Big Challenge 23/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – United Nations members today quickly adopted a high-level political declaration raising the stakes in the global push to ensure everyone in the world has affordable access to health a decade from now. The political declaration is “the most comprehensive agreement ever reached on global health,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the opening session of today’s High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage, being held within the context of the annual UN General Assembly. “This is a significant achievement that will drive progress for the next decade.” World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (Dr Tedros) called it a “landmark for global health and development.” (Left to right) David Malpass, president of the World Bank; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of World Health Organization (WHO); Secretary-General António Guterres; General Assembly President Tijjani Muhammad-Bande; and Movses Abelian, Under-Secretary-General. Tedros told the High Level Meeting that the focus should not only be on Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as other diseases actually kill more people in that country. He also spoke about the affordability of care, giving an example of a father who chose to die rather than use his family’s savings to treat his illness. “No one should ever have to make a choice like that, and yet that is the reality for millions of people every day,” he said. Surgeons stitch up a patient in Banadir Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. Access to basic surgical care is limited in many parts of the world. Tedros also stressed the need for a “crucial shift” to protecting health rather than just treating diseases. He noted the smallest countries will need help, and he said, “ultimately health is a political choice,” urging governments to make that choice. “The world we want is one where health is not a cost but an investment,” he said. “Our vision is not health for some, not health for most. It is health for all.” The declaration comes a day after the WHO and partners flagged the need to double health coverage between now and 2030 or leave up to 5 billion people unable to access health care. WHO said the political declaration committed UN members to invest in four major areas around primary health care. These include mechanisms to provide financial protections for all who need to pay for health care out-of-pocket, and implementing strategies to fight diseases and protect the health of women and children. It also commits them to strengthen health workforce and governance capacity. Governments will report on progress at the UN General Assembly in 2023 On Tuesday (24 September), 12 multilateral organizations including WHO will launch a Global Action Plan for health and wellbeing for all. The plan will ensure the 12 partners provide more streamlined support to countries to help deliver universal health coverage and achieve the health-related SDG targets, WHO said. At the opening session today, World Bank President David Malpass pointed to several priority areas, including increased investment in affordable primary health care, as it has been shown demonstrably that detecting and treating conditions early has a tremendous economic benefit. “The costs of not investing are enormous,” he said, pointing to the situation in the DRC as an example. He also called for an increase in private-sector projects with more privately run health centers, a focus on human capital, and lastly changing the way health is financed. Gro Brundtland, a former WHO director general who holds the title of Eminent High-Level Champion of UHC and member of the Elders, referred to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which she chairs and which launched its annual report on Sunday. She told the meeting that UHC can only be achieved through public financing, and said a few years ago some governments tried to put health care costs on households with disastrous results of causing millions of people to lose health care, an “outrageous human rights violation” still in practice in some countries. She called on all governments to ban this practice. UHC Aspirations and Needs Following the opening session, a range of national presidents took the floor, and were continuing at press time. Most of them spoke about successes in their countries, and progress made so far on reaching UHC. Antonio Guterres and Dr. Tedros speaking at the opening of the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage For instance, the Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said health is one of the four pillars of his administration. They have learned it is necessary to involve all levels of leadership in the process, which must come from a shared vision, and involve every citizen. It also must be aligned with local, national and international policies, and must recognized the interdependence of health systems with others. A president speaking on behalf of the Pacific Island States called on the UN to scale up resources for resilient health systems, and stressed that non-communicable diseases such as diabetes are the leading cause of health problems in the region to the extent that 7 of the top 10 countries for diabetes are in the region. While plenary statements went on, a panel was held entitled, “UHC as a driver of equity, inclusive development and prosperity for all,” involving several senior speakers. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that large segments of the global population are only surviving instead of thriving. She emphasized the right to health for all as essential, and “strongly encouraged” countries to “implement binding legislative policies in order to protect and fulfill the rights of millions.” Wealthy Urged to Pay More On the panel, Columbia University (US) Professor Jeffrey Sachs put it bluntly, saying “this is about money.” Sachs said that people in rich countries need to be willing to pay more to ensure that people in more settings survive. If they don’t, then “children die, mothers die,” he said. “There is nothing else to talk about. Everything else is fake.” Sachs named 15 of the richest billionaires in the world, such as Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and said they could easily end malaria in a long weekend, or set AIDS on the way to being ended in 5 days, for instance, and called on them to directly replenish the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which he said needs $17 billion over 3 years, a small amount for a list of people who have incomes of $50 billion per year. “Honestly these mega-billionaires cannot give way their money faster than they’re making it,” Sachs said. This message may be resonating with the Gates Foundation, for one. In a WHO press release today, Melinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was quoted as saying: “Now that the world has committed to health for all, it is time to get down to the hard work of turning those commitments into results. We all have a role to play. Donors and country governments need to move beyond business as usual to bolster the primary health care systems that address the vast majority of people’s needs over their lifetimes.” In comments to the panel, the Brazilian health minister agreed with Sachs that it is about money, but said it’s also about organization, how to do it. He said Brazil did it on a budget far below what was needed, based on three principles – universality, integrality, and equity. Based on its policies, Brazil does not have drug resistance, for example, and has less than 10% population that smoke and may be the first tobacco-free country in the world. From the price of cancers from smoking you can see the price of it, he said. He suggested vaccination could be the first universal goal, and “talk against those fake news that talk against vaccination.” The minister noted measles this year returned in New York, has appeared in Sao Paolo from tourist ships from Europe which bring it, polio has resurfaced in Philippines, diphtheria in Venezuela. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, said Big Pharma must be “faced down,” as high prices and lack of competition mean vaccinating a child costs some 68 times more today than it did in 2001. She referred to the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines as an example of progress, and welcomed the commitment to price transparency in today’s political declaration. Better Legislation, Budgets, Monitoring Among Needs During the panel, Inter-Parliamentary Union President Gabriela Cuevas Barron called for better legislation, better budgets, and better monitoring. In the end, policies are only going to work if people are at the center, she said. If a child is not healthy, she is not going to learn, she said, and placed particular emphasis on young teen rights. An important point is to work with science, not on policies or morals, she said. “We have to come up w genuine policies that can be implemented and hope that nothing gets lost along the way,” Cuevas said. GAVI CEO Seth Berkley called for prioritizing primary health care, reaching the most underserved and marginalized first, and strengthening policy coherence for sustainable health with increased resource mobilization maximized. UHC2030 Co-Chair Ilona Kickbusch said political decisions beyond health are needed, and that we have heard from countries that have made this choice. It is a social contract, she said. Bachelet agreed with the need for replenishment, but said governments need to prioritize health nonetheless. Uruguay and Chile made it happen, she said, and they not rich countries. We need to call on the rich people of the world, but each government needs to make it a priority themselves. Byanyima said people are paying for health at the expense of their food, selling their land, their houses, affecting their children to pay for health. “We know the super-rich are hiding $17 billion from tax authorities,” she said, and the big companies should also be scrutinized, while the poor are taxed relatively higher in every country. “Let’s end tax dodging,” she said. She noted that in the poorest countries, governments are paying for the vast majority maternal health. Another speaker called for an end to corruption. This led Sachs to remark, “If you want to start with corruption, start with the United States.” A summary of the panel’s key points will be given at the High Level Meeting plenary at 5:30pm today. A second panel is taking place this afternoon. Expert Views In a press briefing earlier in the week, several experts spelled out messages for this week’s General Assembly. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, said for him, the message for the High Level Meeting would be to tell the world on why we should not SDG 3 in isolation to the other goals. This should be integrated, he said. Kalasa noted that most of the pushback seen in the negotiations for the political declaration was in relation to gender and sexual and reproductive health and rights. “We cannot achieve UHC … if we undermine the gender and social norms,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said “a political declaration draws political attention, and that is fundamental.” This declaration will accelerate momentum if leaders get behind it. “It’s a tremendous achievement to have a political declaration that draws attention at the highest level,” she said. “It’s an unfinished business of course.” The declaration is in a way a starting point, she said, because there is so much that needs to be done to be on track for the SDGs and UHC. For instance, there needs to be much more attention drawn to how much health is a contributor to the economy, and it is that dimension that draws attention even more for political leaders. Health is needed to have productive workers, people successful at school, and so on. Second, she said it could be said that health is lagging behind compared to other sectors of the economy in leveraging data and digital in a way that transforms health systems for better access, more efficiency, and more effective results. “Digital is definitely an area where there are opportunities to achieve more,” Colombo said. Stefan Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, said UHC is a political project, so “obviously it’s great to get commitments” from heads of state, “we really need those.” Then as they move to the strategy level, “we need to see that converted to more resources and more attention to primary health care,” he said. And he made a point that the H in both UHC and PHC means Health and not just Health Care, saying that’s where we need primary care, preventive, promotive, but also the multisectoral determinants of health, and we need to empower communities as equal actors in this. Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, said at WHO, we say UHC is a political choice, and in that light a global political declaration is a necessary but insufficient step towards translating this into health outcomes to the world’s most vulnerable. So we need commitment to actions, at the country level, he said. “We want to see heads of state turning this global political declaration into a real choice at country level to invest in the right programmatic choices,” said Salama. “And we believe firmly that primary health care is the cornerstone to achieving UHC, so we want to see heads of state, ministers, cabinets, investing in a multisectoral and from a health perspective in those hard choices around the most cost-effective health measures which we believe are captured by PHC.” Secondarily, he said, they want to see the commitment to financial services. Most countries, by either increasing their health budget or reallocating budgets toward primary health care, can actually achieve these goals from their own domestic resources. “This is absolutely, imminently achievable,” he said. There is a group of countries that won’t achieve it alone, and “that’s where one of our asks is for the international donor community to focus aid on the most vulnerable, the poorest countries, the fragile countries, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa,” Salama said. “This is what we want to see, and a commitment of an additional 1% of GDP put into action.” Separately, civil society groups issued their assessment of the political declaration, raising concerns about specific commitments in the text. https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-23-at-4.51.17-PM.mp4 Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, UN Photo/Tobin Jones. Climate Summit Garners Modest Commitments On Clean Air, Foods, Oceans & Coal Phase-Out 23/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Monday’s long-awaited United Nations Climate Summit produced no dramatic surprises, but a long list of modest commitments offered a glimmer of a way forward. Government leaders, CEOs, and heads of major philanthropies announced a string of new initiatives to clean up the air, restore oceans, advance more sustainable food systems, phase out coal, plant forests, protect small island states, and better align trade rules with climate goals. Leaders of the planet’s two most polluting nations, China and the United States, were absent from the summit stage – although US President Donald Trump, who has said he would withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, made a brief, unannounced appearance in the audience during the morning’s remarks by India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, before heading to a meeting on religious freedom. Chinese president President Xi Jinping sent a representative who recited an impressive litany of Chinese innovations in areas such as renewable energy and e-transport, but stepped gingerly around the debate over controversial new projects such as China’s massive Belt and Road project through Asia, which critics say could stimulate new sources of climate emissions. A cluster of new initiatives by businesses, philanthropies and governments, however, offered at least some new directions and fresh models for stepping up action on climate drivers that are undermining the fundamental requirements of life on earth – as well as damaging health more visibly than ever before. Opening ceremony of the Climate Action Summit. Those announcements included the launch of a new US$50 million “Clean Air Fund” by a number of leading philanthropies and a “One Planet Business for Biodiversity” initiative led by the corporate giant Danone – which aims to restructure food systems that have “broken the cycle of life” in the words of Danone CEO Emmanuel Faber. Over 40 countries and 70 cities signed a Summit commitment to a WHO Clean Air Initiative to reduce air pollution from sources that also drive climate change by 2030. Together those clean air commitments represent some 750 million people worldwide, WHO sources told Health Policy Watch. Some 60 countries at the Summit pledged to reach net zero climate emissions by 2050, so as to keep average temperature rise below 1.5 C, although climate scientists have warned that even at that level, impacts could still be severe and unpredictable. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, founder and head of Bloomberg Philanthropies, declared that his massive foundation would accelerate its “Beyond Coal” initiative to ensure that “no new coal plants” would be built anywhere in the world after 2020, and those already constructed would be phased out. French President Emmanuel Macron spoke of the critical need to harmonize trade rules with climate goals – a clear reference to the fact that global trade now incentivizes a carbon-intensive global economy based on the long-distance transport of many goods. And among a range of green finance initiatives, the insurance giant Allianz committed to net zero emissions for its investment portfolios of some US$2.4 trillion. Parts of the Solomon Islands are submerged by rising sea levels. Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg said that her country would step up ocean-based climate initiatives, which could reduce global emissions by as much as 20%, generate sustainable energy and ensure sustainability of ocean based food sources. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan, as well as the leaders of Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, laid out ambitious plans for reforesting vast swathes of their countries. Indonesian and DRC rain forests comprise the green lungs for much of South-East Asia and Africa, their leaders noted. And in the case of Pakistan, forests could help sustain the Himalayan glacier systems that regulate water supplies for millions of people, Khan said. Small island states, which are most directly affected by climate change, announced initiatives in insurance, finance as well as in coastal ecosystems and fresh water preservation. They included Barbados’ “Roofs to Reefs” initiative, which would “help protect our fresh water resources and vital coastal reefs” which provide a buffer from storms as well as rich grounds for fish breeding and aquatic life. Desperate Cry by Swedish Youth Activist Greta Thunberg sets the Tone Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, passionately appeals to world leaders to take stronger climate actions. The summit began with yet another in a recent series of calls by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to redouble action: “Nature is angry, … and nature is striking back with fury,” Guterres said. He was followed by a desperate and angry cry from the Swedish youth activist Greta Thunberg. She began her remarks saying, “this is all wrong. I shouldn’t be standing here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean… “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. And all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!” cried Thunberg. Clean Air and Healthier Foods Corporate, philanthropic and government leaders repeatedly referred to the cries of youths like Thunberg in their responses, although it was clear that all were groping to provide sufficient robust answers. “We beg you to listen to our youth because they are demanding this regenerative culture, and listen to that inner voice that whispers to us that life is sacred,” said Danone’s Faber, sounding an almost mystical note. “The food system that we have built over the last century is a dead end for the future…. We thought we could engineer the life we needed and kill the rest in the fields… The resulting mono-cropping consequences are standing right in front of us now. We depend for two thirds of our food on this planet on only nine plants today. Some 40% of land is degraded.” (Left to Right) CEO of Danone, Emmanuel Faber; President of Republic of Guatemala, Jimmy Morales; President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Félix Tshisekedi; Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg. Faber said that the “One Planet” business coalition of 20 of the world’s largest food and agro-based companies representing some US$500 billion in sales would work to restore soil health with regenerative agricultural practices; create consumer demand for more varieties of crops; rein in agro-based deforestation; and put “nature-based solutions at the heart of our strategies and our priorities.” But he added that government agricultural subsidies also need a major overhaul so as to shift farm incentives from “killing life” to protecting biodiversity. Meanwhile, Jane Burston, Executive Director of the Clean Air Fund, said that the new initiative would tackle air pollution that kills some 7 million people annually, transforming it into an “opportunity to not only save millions of lives but to avert dangerous climate change. “I want you to imagine what that means for a second. Imagine the families losing a parent to lung cancer …the schoolgirl gulping for air on the roadside because of an asthma attack brought on by traffic pollution …the baby whose brain and lungs will never develop properly because of the air his mother could not avoid breathing, And many millions more are living with chronic conditions caused and exacerbated by air pollution. “This is a public health emergency, and it is getting worse,” said Burston. She added that since “the causes of climate change are often the same as the causes of air pollution – two thirds of outdoor air pollution is from burning fossil fuels – like coal – for power, transport and industry. The solutions can also be the same: renewable energy, electric mobility, more walking and cycling.” And in economic terms, she cited World Bank and OECD data saying that cleaner air would save trillions of dollars every year in avoided health costs that drag down economic productivity. Jane Burston announcing the launch of the Clean Air Fund. Burston said that the US $50 million in clean air commitments was halfway to its target of US$ 100 million that the Fund hopes to recruit. The initiative is backed by IKEA Foundation, Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, Oak Foundation, Bernard van Leer Foundation, FIA Foundation and the Guys and St Thomas’s Charity. “I urge the leaders gathered here today to respond to the World Health Organisation’s call to action, and to put tackling air pollution at the top of your agenda, because clean air is a human right and together we can make it a human reality,” added Burston. “The real cost of carbon is felt in our lungs,” said WHO’s Maria Neira in an op-ed published Monday in The BMJ. But it is also felt in national economies, she added, noting that air pollution’s health impacts cost OECD economies on average 4% of their annual GDP, and close to 10% for some countries in Asia. The countries and cities that joined WHO’s Clean Air initiative, led by Spain and Peru, would aim to reach WHO air quality guidelines by 2030, in the context of the Climate Summit’s social and political track of commitments. Certainly the ears of many delegates in the hall were ringing throughout the day with words of Thunberg, who in the close of her remarks had said, “The eyes of all future generations are upon you. And if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now is where we draw the line. The world is waking up. And change is coming, whether you like it or not.” Whether her words will echo further in the coming weeks and months remains to be seen. Youth climate activists protest outside the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative’s closed-door meeting, held the day before the UN Climate Action Summit. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Updated 24 September, 2019 Image Credits: UN Photo/Cia Pak, UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe, Thelma Young/350.org. Progress On Universal Health Coverage Lagging: WHO Report Released Ahead Of High Level UHC Meeting 22/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – Despite advances in Universal Health Coverage (UHC), as many as 5 billion people would be left without full access to healthcare in 2030 at the present rate of progress, according to a new report led by the World Health Organization. And financial protections that shield families from catastrophic health expenses have been eroded in some countries, says the report, released just ahead of Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC here at UN Headquarters. The Universal Health Coverage Global Monitoring Report 2019 calls on governments to redouble the pace of expanding coverage, and commit to spending at least 1% of their GDP on primary health care. The report was published just ahead of Monday’s expected adoption of a UN political declaration on UHC, committing UN member states to ensure that people worldwide can access quality healthcare affordably by 2030. “Despite the progress, UHC coverage is stalled or not on track, and only about half the world population will be covered in 2030. Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate, and we need to double the coverage in order to reach the target of UHC for all by 2030,” said Samira Asma, WHO Assistant Director-General for Data, Analytics and Delivery, in a press briefing last week, just ahead of the start of the 74th UN General Assembly, where the UHC High Level Meeting is taking place. People wait in line for medical consultations in Bamako, Mali. The report was prepared by the WHO with contributions from the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations Population Fund, and UNICEF. The report was released today. Primary health care is another key focus of the report’s findings. “Investing an additional US$ 200 billion a year on scaling up primary health care across low and middle-income countries would potentially save 60 million lives, increase average life expectancy by 3.7 years by 2030, and contribute significantly to socio-economic development,” WHO said in a press release. “It would represent a 5% increase on the US$ 7.5 trillion already spent on health globally each year.” The 163-page report filled with the latest-available data and analysis shows an increase in the “UHC service coverage index” (SCI) measuring progress on SDG indicator 3.8.1 (financial protection and coverage of essential health services). The SCI rose from a global average of 45 (of 100) in 2000 to 66 in 2017, and all regions and income groups recorded gains, according to the report. “This level of political commitment is more welcome than ever because it is essential on two fronts: first, to accelerate progress in areas where we have seen improvements; and second, to remove the barriers that are slowing down access to services in some countries and among certain populations,” WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in the report, referring to the High Level Meeting on UHC. According to the report, “Progress has been greatest in lower income countries, mainly driven by interventions for infectious diseases and, to less extent, for reproductive, maternal, new-born and child health services. But the poorest countries and those affected by conflict generally lag far behind.” But the pace of progress on UHC has slowed since 2010. Based on current trends, by 2030 only 39%- 63% of the global population would be covered for essential health services, the report projects. “Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate – and coverage needs to double – to reach the SDG target of UHC for all by 2030.” In addition, levels of catastrophic health expenditures (SDG indicator 3.8.2), which represent out-of-pocket spending in proportion to household income, rose continuously from 2000 to 2015. Nearly a billion people spent more than 10% of household income on health in 2015, and over 200 million spent more than 25%, the report found. Experts Speak on Report, High Level Meeting The report comes against a backdrop of a UN General Assembly where the UHC meeting is a key highlight, said WHO officials. In fact, this may be the first time the UN General Assembly has spent so much of its session on health and health-related climate issues, said WHO Chief of Staff Bernhard Schwartlander at last week’s press briefing. “I think it is clear health is at the core of the Sustainable Development Agenda,” Schwartlander said. “In many ways, it’s a docking station for development overall for many other of the Development Goals, and UHC in a sense brings it all together.” “The good news is that all around the world, across all income groups, health service coverage is improving, has improved in this time period. Unfortunately, the rate of progress is declining, in relation to issues such as non-communicable diseases, limitations in health systems, and the fact that the group of lower income countries are falling tragically behind,” Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, told reporters. Reaching the “Natural Limit” of the Previous Global Health Model? “In many ways, we may have reached the natural limit of our previous global health model,” he said. “We see what is left in terms of coverage are some of the hardest countries – fragile states in particular – the poorest and most vulnerable, and also some of the hardest to reach people within countries: the rural poor, the peri-urban poor, for example,” he added. On financial hardship, on one hand the world is getting richer, and overall poverty rates are declining, he said. But poverty related to health care expenditure is actually increasing. “So the improvements in service coverage are coming at a real cost to individuals and their families,” said Salama. “This cost is measured by out-of-pocket expenditures, which are increasing. One way we measure that is catastrophic expenditures, households that are spending over 10% or 25% of their overall income or consumption on basic health care. And they are both increasing.” Both of these problems can be addressed by universal health coverage, the “cornerstone” of UHC as argued in the report, said Salama. On the price tag for UHC, he said, “Even though it seems like a large sum, we know that most countries can afford to do this based on their domestic resources. Only a handful of countries require international aid in order to scale up their primary health care.” “If we do this, we will have up to 5 billion more people receiving UHC by 2030, and will save up to 100 million lives,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said that “a lot of good progress has been made,” but added that “it is quite shocking” to see the increasing number of people who are at risk of poverty due to health spending. “And even in high-income countries where we have the lowest exposure to such risks, there has been a growth in the share and the number of people who spend large proportions of their household budgets on health. The out-of-pocket expenditures are mainly for pharmaceuticals and out-patient care, she said. While high-income countries score better overall in terms of access to services, there remain many important gaps, she said, particularly in relation to preventative services, especially for the poorest. And there are inequalities which persist, such as at-risk women not getting breast cancer screenings. “Make the Last Mile the First Mile” Speaking at the same press briefing, Stefan Swartling Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, stressed the importance of primary health care as a cornerstone of universal coverage. “As a parent, what I need whether I’m rich or poor is local access to good quality health services that I can afford. That service is primary health care, it’s not the big expensive hospital which is far away,” he said, adding that primary health care (PHC) can take care of 80-90% of a country’s healthcare needs. “My message is that we need to make the last mile [to the household door] the first mile,” Peterson said. PHC is the pathway to reach UHC, and it is “very exciting,” he said to see the digital innovations that can deliver PHC more effectively. “This is really the cutting edge of health care delivery.” Muhammad Pate, Global Director for Health, Nutrition and Population at the World Bank, stressed that UHC is key to human capital accumulation. It drives labour mobility, job creation, and also mitigates the risk of pandemics and other health emergencies, he said. While primary health care is the cornerstone for UHC, it needs to include access to essential drugs, he said, noting that costly drugs are a key driver of catastrophic health expenses. And such access needs to include not only drugs to treat common infectious diseases and maternal health conditions, but also the most prevalent NCDs, including mental health conditions. On financial protection, Pate said increasing domestic resources is necessary but it is not sufficient by itself to improve financial protection. How domestic resources are organized is key, he said. The World Bank is working with over 100 countries to leverage investments toward UHC, and progress needs to be accelerated. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, focused on areas where there are gaps in data and in services, the first being maternal/newborn/children health, where he noted that low-income countries continue to suffer from high rates of maternal and child mortality. More attention is needed to areas such as reproductive health, as well as to exploring why some women don’t use maternal/newborn or reproductive health services, due to social and gender concerns. “The improvements will be accelerated if we pay attention to the human rights of girls and women to make decisions over their own bodies and strategically,” he said. Kalasa also mentioned the “population dynamic” placing a burden on health systems as the global population is expected to reach 8.5 billion by 2030 and will also be changing in terms of age, mobility and urbanization. Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC is expected to be filled with grand statements, but it will remain to be seen what concrete commitments are made during this General Assembly, and how they will be implemented going forward. Image Credits: UN Photo/Marco Dormino, WHO. WHO Launches “Clean Air Coalition”; New Clean Air Fund To Be Announced Tomorrow 22/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – WHO said Sunday that it was launching a “Clean Air Coalition” led by the Governments of Spain and Peru, while a group of philanthropic organizations and foundations were poised to launch a new “Clean Air Fund” at Monday’s Climate Summit to spur investment in reducing sources of air pollution, which also contribute to climate change. A factory in the United States emitting smoke into the atmosphere. Some 29 countries and over 50 subnational entities have pledged to join the coalition committed to achieving healthy air quality by 2030, as part of their Climate Summit pledges, said Spain’s Health Minister María Luisa Carcedo, speaking at a WHO-organized side event on Sunday, the day before the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit brings together heads of state. The Clean Air Coalition is also being supported by the UN Secretary General’s Office and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition of UN Environment, said WHO’s Director of Public Health and Environment, Maria Neira. As for the new Clean Air Fund being formally launched tomorrow, Executive Director Jane Burston, said that the fund brings together “a group of like-minded philanthropic foundations” which have recognized that tackling air pollution will have “huge benefits for health as well as for climate.” “Clean Air Fund” launch announced at a WHO-sponsored side event. Burston said that a report being published by the new fund tomorrow surveyed the funding landscape and found that philanthropic investment in air quality initiatives is disproportionately low in comparison to the burden disease caused by air pollution – which is estimated to kill some 7 million people around the world every year. Additionally, the report found that most money is spent only in a few countries – even though WHO estimates that over 90% of people around the world breathe unhealthy air. “As a result of very limited funding on air quality, deaths from outdoor air pollution and ozone alone are forecast to double by 2050… we just cannot let that happen,” Burston said. She said that the new Clean Air Fund aims to support projects that “democratize” air quality data, making knowledge about air quality more widely accessible to large numbers of people in cities, through projects such as the Breathe London project. Breathe London has created a network of mobile sensors that allow children to decide how best to walk to school and parents to identify pollution hot spots. The new Clean Air Fund will also support “ambitious local government action,” Burston added, noting that they were working with cities that are part of the C-40 network to broaden air quality monitoring as well as with Pure Earth on a mapping of potential air quality interventions and documentation of how those support climate and health goals. Although she did not put a dollar amount, more details of the Fund are to be revealed Monday. Observers predicted that it would amount to an investment of tens of millions of dollars in new air quality efforts. Any investment, said Burston, would be starting from the current, “incredibly low base” of financial commitments to better air quality. “We don’t have anywhere the basis that we need to tackle the crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/John Isaac. Thousands “Walk The Talk” At Event To Raise Awareness For Universal Health Coverage 22/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY – Thousands of people attended a Sunday morning walk/run event here in Central Park to raise awareness for Universal Health Coverage, co-hosted by the World Health Organization and the City of New York. The “Walk the Talk: Healthcare for All Challenge” kicks off a week of high-level talks at the 74th United Nations General Assembly, including tomorrow’s long-anticipated High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as well as the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit. Participants mill around Central Park at “Walk the Talk.” “Today we are walking for our own health. But we are also marching to demand health for all,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, at the opening of the event. The event brought together both New York locals, UN officials, and people from all around the world to commit to health and wellness on an individual and global level. Staff from UN offices around the world such as UNICEF, WHO’s Western Pacific Regional Office and Pan-American Health Organization attended the event, and many major global health organizations such as Vital Strategies also showed up to support. A number of world leaders also participated in the fun-run, including the President of Palau, Thomas Remengesau Jr., and Norway’s Minister of Health, Bent Høie. The event was positioned around the larger conversation underway this week at the UN regarding both UHC and action on climate change. Ricky Kej, Grammy-award winning musician, shares the stage with a multicultural ensemble at “Walk the Talk.” Grammy-winning artist and activist Ricky Kej performed at the closing ceremony, raising awareness on climate change and hearing loss in youth. WHO estimates that over 1 billion youth are at risk of hearing loss from unsafe listening devices. Other speakers reiterated the challenges to achieving universal health coverage. “We are not doing enough to safeguard the future of our children, not when there is very little being done when young people reach the age of 10,” said Zoleka Mandela, activist and granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, pointing to gaps in access in healthcare, and neglect of sexual and reproductive health, injuries, and non-communicable diseases on the adolescent health agenda. Zoleka Mandela, granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, calls for a Global Adolescent Summit. Barely 2% of current global health funding is targeted towards adolescent health. Overall, some 51-67% percent of the world’s population does not have access to universal health coverage, according to a new report released today by the World Health Organization. Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former director-general of the WHO and a founding member of the group of statesmen and stateswomen known as “The Elders”, pointed to the United States’ lack of publicly-funded healthcare and urged states to fulfill their responsibilities to “provide effective and comprehensive public health care to all citizens.” European Union Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis gave a rousing speech along similar lines, urging US participants to push for higher health coverage and “make this country great again.” Dr. Tedros ended the event by reiterating that universal health coverage is a “political issue.” “By walking today,” he said, “We are asking our world leaders to honor their commitment on September 2015 when they agreed to achieve universal health coverage for all by 2030.” Image Credits: Gabby Stern/WHO, Ricky Kej, G Ren/HP-Watch. Civil Society Takes Charge On Climate Action As Governments Waver 21/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Youth leaders from around the world clamored for more action on climate change Saturday at a first-ever United Nation’s Youth Climate Summit – even as the actual government commitments lined up for Monday’s formal meeting with heads of state appeared likely fall far short of making the dramatic changes that scientists say would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5° C. Youth activists and the Secretary-General of the UN give opening remarks at the Youth Climate Summit. Sources told Health Policy Watch that some 50 national commitments were due to be announced Monday at the UN Climate Summit. But these would not be sufficient to sharply reduce the pace of climate change that right now has the world heading for 3°C or higher temperatures by the end of the century. That, health experts have warned, would trigger an unprecedented spiral of threats to human health, food security, disease transmission and to the very survival of small island states and coastal communities. (Left to Right) Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC executive secretary, WHO’s Maria Neira, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. Against the dark scientific predictions, Saturday’s assembly was a further reflection of how civil society organizations of all stripes – from climate researchers to public health advocates, students and urban leaders– have been mobilizing to seize initiative where governments have so far failed. On Thursday, a consortium of scientists published The Exponential Roadmap, outlining 36 strategies that could slash greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 if they were scaled up rapidly. These 36 solutions – ranging from solar and wind to electric bikes, commercial shipping and reduced red meat consumption – could “stabilize earth’s temperatures and significantly reduce risks to societies” said the authors of the report by the Future Earth consortium, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. “This is now a race against time, but businesses and even entire industries have made many significant transitions in less than 10 years,” said report author Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of Future Earth, an international research programme, in a press release. Saturday’s Climate Youth Summit also came in the wake of Friday’s historic global climate strike that mobilized 4 million people worldwide, many from youth-led movements, who demanded more accountability from government and industry leaders. “I want the leaders of the world to respect the rights of future generations, respect the right to a habitable planet… We are not insurance policies, We are communities, we are human communities. Is it really too much to ask you to walk the talk?” Kamal Karishma Kumar, a young activist from the island of Fiji, a country threatened by rising sea levels, told the world leaders at the Youth Summit inside UN Headquarters. Youth participants also demanded greater accountability from industry representatives who were present at the Summit. One activist challenged Microsoft’s Chief Environmental Officer, Lucas Jappa, over recent business deals with fossil fuel companies. “If Microsoft is so committed to sustainability, why did Microsoft partner with Chevron and Schlumberger this week to accelerate oil extraction?… Do you care more about profit than you care about us?” she asked. Making new business deals with the fossil fuels industry is an issue that “the entire tech sector and everybody who is living in the world today, which is predicated upon an oil and gas economy, has to answer,” Microsoft’s Jappa responded. “It’s a conversation that we’re having inside the company and it’s one that I think you’ll be hearing more about, both from Microsoft and our peers in the broader tech sector…. Know that Microsoft will be engaging in this dialogue moving forward,” Jappa added. Monday’s Summit Portrayed as a “Beginning” not a “Milestone” The Youth Summit took place against a background of sober recognition that the level of commitment from global leaders moving into Monday’s high-level Climate Action Summit was likely to be muted. And leaders were busy recasting the Monday meeting as the beginning and not the end of the process. “We have 50 commitments, that is not negligible,” said Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “There is nothing in life that is black or white, everything is shades of grey and I am absolutely sure that this [summit] will take us to the next level,” Figueres, now a lead actor in Mission 2020, a partner organisation in the Exponential Roadmap, told Health Policy Watch in a brief interview. Figueres said she had been “inspired and called to account” by young people speaking out at events such as the Youth Summit, “They have said our generation has not done our job – nobody is exempt, everybody has to do something.” UN Secretary-General, António Guterres. The youth movement and leaders such as Greta Thunberg will be remembered as making “the biggest difference” in the climate movement, said Norway’s Environment and Climate Minister, Ola Elvestuen, at the UN meeting. Speaking at today’s Youth Summit event, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, sounded a note of hope. “When I started two years ago… I felt very discouraged in relation to the perspectives about climate action. We were already facing a climate emergency… At the same time, there was an apathy, there was a sense of difficulty in getting people to act.” Now, he said, public sentiment is finally turning around. But asked later by Health Policy Watch if he had “high hopes” that Monday would be a milestone, The Secretary General paused and said only “I have… hopes.” Health Mobilizing More Aggressively Recognizing that climate impacts people’s health can also help motivate climate action, said Thunberg upon a visit to a “Pollution Pods” exhibit on the UN lawn, sponsored by the World Health Organization. The traveling exhibit, by British artist Michael Pinsky, recreates the experience of pollution in five cities of the world, ranging from highly polluted Delhi and Beijing to moderately polluted London and Oslo. Greta Thunberg at WHO’s Pollution Pods exhibit. “If we can connect the climate crisis with air pollution, it is just so connected and we cannot solve one without solving the other,” said Thunberg. WHO has been leading research and policy synthesis on climate and health issues for nearly two decades. Now some of the largest humanitarian and health civil society organizations are speaking up more assertively. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) both issued statements just ahead of the Summit about the urgency of addressing climate change. The International Federation of the Red Cross report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, warned that by 2050 some 200 million people a year will be in need of humanitarian assistance due to climate related events, double today’s level. Costs of responding to humanitarian crises will balloon to USD$20 billion. The global health and humanitarian aid communities are facing a “climate emergency,” said the Executive Director of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, in another statement, issued on Thursday. Vital Strategies, a longtime health actor on tobacco control, NCDs, and traffic injuries has also become active in the climate space (see interview). And dedicated NGOs, such as Health Care without Harm, and the Global Climate and Health Alliance, have also appeared on the scene to address health workers about the urgent health impacts of climate change, as well as to advocate for reducing the climate footprint of the health sector, which is responsible for as much as 4.5% of climate emissions, according to a recent report. New Roadmap Provides 36 Solutions to Cut Climate Emissions 50% by 2030 Worldwide Among scientists, as well, there is a stronger note of activism, as reflected in reports such as the Exponential Roadmap. The report identifies a number of “tipping points” it says could accelerate transformation toward a more sustainable global economy, including: Low cost solar, wind, and battery technologies, which are on profitable, exponential trajectories that if sustained, will be enough to halve emissions from electricity generation by 2030; Electric vehicle growth, which has the potential to reach a 90% market share by 2030 if sustained, but only if strong policies support this direction; Growing social movements changing the public conversation in parallel with companies and cities stepping up climate action; Emerging political support for more ambitious targets, for example countries such as the UK, France, Norway and Sweden adopting laws to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier. Along with that, digital technology could support a rapid transformation of economic systems – although if it is not managed, digital transformation also could drive emissions higher, the report’s authors warn. Of the report, Figueres said, “I see all evidence that social and economic tipping points are aligning. We can now say the next decade has the potential to see the fastest economic transition in history. The 2019 Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for the necessary journey to net-zero emissions.” Manuel Pugal-Vidal, leader of the climate and energy practice at WWF, a partner of the report said in a statement, “Governments must introduce national targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 with targets to cut emissions 50% by 2030. Immediate removal of fossil-fuel subsidies is a priority. Yet policies must be equitable and fair or risk failure.” “Developed nations with significant historic emissions also have a responsibility to reduce emissions faster. Cities and states – not only countries – will also be important change makers,” he adds. More from HPW’s interview with Maria Neira, Christiana Figueres, and Michelle Bachelet: https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.45.40-PM-2.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.57.10-PM.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.53.47-PM.mp4 For more about the story of the “Pollution Pods” see here. Grace Ren also contributed to this story. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, Fletcher/HP-Watch. “We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Climate Summit Garners Modest Commitments On Clean Air, Foods, Oceans & Coal Phase-Out 23/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Monday’s long-awaited United Nations Climate Summit produced no dramatic surprises, but a long list of modest commitments offered a glimmer of a way forward. Government leaders, CEOs, and heads of major philanthropies announced a string of new initiatives to clean up the air, restore oceans, advance more sustainable food systems, phase out coal, plant forests, protect small island states, and better align trade rules with climate goals. Leaders of the planet’s two most polluting nations, China and the United States, were absent from the summit stage – although US President Donald Trump, who has said he would withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, made a brief, unannounced appearance in the audience during the morning’s remarks by India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, before heading to a meeting on religious freedom. Chinese president President Xi Jinping sent a representative who recited an impressive litany of Chinese innovations in areas such as renewable energy and e-transport, but stepped gingerly around the debate over controversial new projects such as China’s massive Belt and Road project through Asia, which critics say could stimulate new sources of climate emissions. A cluster of new initiatives by businesses, philanthropies and governments, however, offered at least some new directions and fresh models for stepping up action on climate drivers that are undermining the fundamental requirements of life on earth – as well as damaging health more visibly than ever before. Opening ceremony of the Climate Action Summit. Those announcements included the launch of a new US$50 million “Clean Air Fund” by a number of leading philanthropies and a “One Planet Business for Biodiversity” initiative led by the corporate giant Danone – which aims to restructure food systems that have “broken the cycle of life” in the words of Danone CEO Emmanuel Faber. Over 40 countries and 70 cities signed a Summit commitment to a WHO Clean Air Initiative to reduce air pollution from sources that also drive climate change by 2030. Together those clean air commitments represent some 750 million people worldwide, WHO sources told Health Policy Watch. Some 60 countries at the Summit pledged to reach net zero climate emissions by 2050, so as to keep average temperature rise below 1.5 C, although climate scientists have warned that even at that level, impacts could still be severe and unpredictable. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, founder and head of Bloomberg Philanthropies, declared that his massive foundation would accelerate its “Beyond Coal” initiative to ensure that “no new coal plants” would be built anywhere in the world after 2020, and those already constructed would be phased out. French President Emmanuel Macron spoke of the critical need to harmonize trade rules with climate goals – a clear reference to the fact that global trade now incentivizes a carbon-intensive global economy based on the long-distance transport of many goods. And among a range of green finance initiatives, the insurance giant Allianz committed to net zero emissions for its investment portfolios of some US$2.4 trillion. Parts of the Solomon Islands are submerged by rising sea levels. Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg said that her country would step up ocean-based climate initiatives, which could reduce global emissions by as much as 20%, generate sustainable energy and ensure sustainability of ocean based food sources. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan, as well as the leaders of Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, laid out ambitious plans for reforesting vast swathes of their countries. Indonesian and DRC rain forests comprise the green lungs for much of South-East Asia and Africa, their leaders noted. And in the case of Pakistan, forests could help sustain the Himalayan glacier systems that regulate water supplies for millions of people, Khan said. Small island states, which are most directly affected by climate change, announced initiatives in insurance, finance as well as in coastal ecosystems and fresh water preservation. They included Barbados’ “Roofs to Reefs” initiative, which would “help protect our fresh water resources and vital coastal reefs” which provide a buffer from storms as well as rich grounds for fish breeding and aquatic life. Desperate Cry by Swedish Youth Activist Greta Thunberg sets the Tone Greta Thunberg, young climate activist, passionately appeals to world leaders to take stronger climate actions. The summit began with yet another in a recent series of calls by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to redouble action: “Nature is angry, … and nature is striking back with fury,” Guterres said. He was followed by a desperate and angry cry from the Swedish youth activist Greta Thunberg. She began her remarks saying, “this is all wrong. I shouldn’t be standing here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean… “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. And all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!” cried Thunberg. Clean Air and Healthier Foods Corporate, philanthropic and government leaders repeatedly referred to the cries of youths like Thunberg in their responses, although it was clear that all were groping to provide sufficient robust answers. “We beg you to listen to our youth because they are demanding this regenerative culture, and listen to that inner voice that whispers to us that life is sacred,” said Danone’s Faber, sounding an almost mystical note. “The food system that we have built over the last century is a dead end for the future…. We thought we could engineer the life we needed and kill the rest in the fields… The resulting mono-cropping consequences are standing right in front of us now. We depend for two thirds of our food on this planet on only nine plants today. Some 40% of land is degraded.” (Left to Right) CEO of Danone, Emmanuel Faber; President of Republic of Guatemala, Jimmy Morales; President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Félix Tshisekedi; Norway’s Prime Minister, Erna Solberg. Faber said that the “One Planet” business coalition of 20 of the world’s largest food and agro-based companies representing some US$500 billion in sales would work to restore soil health with regenerative agricultural practices; create consumer demand for more varieties of crops; rein in agro-based deforestation; and put “nature-based solutions at the heart of our strategies and our priorities.” But he added that government agricultural subsidies also need a major overhaul so as to shift farm incentives from “killing life” to protecting biodiversity. Meanwhile, Jane Burston, Executive Director of the Clean Air Fund, said that the new initiative would tackle air pollution that kills some 7 million people annually, transforming it into an “opportunity to not only save millions of lives but to avert dangerous climate change. “I want you to imagine what that means for a second. Imagine the families losing a parent to lung cancer …the schoolgirl gulping for air on the roadside because of an asthma attack brought on by traffic pollution …the baby whose brain and lungs will never develop properly because of the air his mother could not avoid breathing, And many millions more are living with chronic conditions caused and exacerbated by air pollution. “This is a public health emergency, and it is getting worse,” said Burston. She added that since “the causes of climate change are often the same as the causes of air pollution – two thirds of outdoor air pollution is from burning fossil fuels – like coal – for power, transport and industry. The solutions can also be the same: renewable energy, electric mobility, more walking and cycling.” And in economic terms, she cited World Bank and OECD data saying that cleaner air would save trillions of dollars every year in avoided health costs that drag down economic productivity. Jane Burston announcing the launch of the Clean Air Fund. Burston said that the US $50 million in clean air commitments was halfway to its target of US$ 100 million that the Fund hopes to recruit. The initiative is backed by IKEA Foundation, Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, Oak Foundation, Bernard van Leer Foundation, FIA Foundation and the Guys and St Thomas’s Charity. “I urge the leaders gathered here today to respond to the World Health Organisation’s call to action, and to put tackling air pollution at the top of your agenda, because clean air is a human right and together we can make it a human reality,” added Burston. “The real cost of carbon is felt in our lungs,” said WHO’s Maria Neira in an op-ed published Monday in The BMJ. But it is also felt in national economies, she added, noting that air pollution’s health impacts cost OECD economies on average 4% of their annual GDP, and close to 10% for some countries in Asia. The countries and cities that joined WHO’s Clean Air initiative, led by Spain and Peru, would aim to reach WHO air quality guidelines by 2030, in the context of the Climate Summit’s social and political track of commitments. Certainly the ears of many delegates in the hall were ringing throughout the day with words of Thunberg, who in the close of her remarks had said, “The eyes of all future generations are upon you. And if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now is where we draw the line. The world is waking up. And change is coming, whether you like it or not.” Whether her words will echo further in the coming weeks and months remains to be seen. Youth climate activists protest outside the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative’s closed-door meeting, held the day before the UN Climate Action Summit. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Updated 24 September, 2019 Image Credits: UN Photo/Cia Pak, UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe, Thelma Young/350.org. Progress On Universal Health Coverage Lagging: WHO Report Released Ahead Of High Level UHC Meeting 22/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – Despite advances in Universal Health Coverage (UHC), as many as 5 billion people would be left without full access to healthcare in 2030 at the present rate of progress, according to a new report led by the World Health Organization. And financial protections that shield families from catastrophic health expenses have been eroded in some countries, says the report, released just ahead of Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC here at UN Headquarters. The Universal Health Coverage Global Monitoring Report 2019 calls on governments to redouble the pace of expanding coverage, and commit to spending at least 1% of their GDP on primary health care. The report was published just ahead of Monday’s expected adoption of a UN political declaration on UHC, committing UN member states to ensure that people worldwide can access quality healthcare affordably by 2030. “Despite the progress, UHC coverage is stalled or not on track, and only about half the world population will be covered in 2030. Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate, and we need to double the coverage in order to reach the target of UHC for all by 2030,” said Samira Asma, WHO Assistant Director-General for Data, Analytics and Delivery, in a press briefing last week, just ahead of the start of the 74th UN General Assembly, where the UHC High Level Meeting is taking place. People wait in line for medical consultations in Bamako, Mali. The report was prepared by the WHO with contributions from the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations Population Fund, and UNICEF. The report was released today. Primary health care is another key focus of the report’s findings. “Investing an additional US$ 200 billion a year on scaling up primary health care across low and middle-income countries would potentially save 60 million lives, increase average life expectancy by 3.7 years by 2030, and contribute significantly to socio-economic development,” WHO said in a press release. “It would represent a 5% increase on the US$ 7.5 trillion already spent on health globally each year.” The 163-page report filled with the latest-available data and analysis shows an increase in the “UHC service coverage index” (SCI) measuring progress on SDG indicator 3.8.1 (financial protection and coverage of essential health services). The SCI rose from a global average of 45 (of 100) in 2000 to 66 in 2017, and all regions and income groups recorded gains, according to the report. “This level of political commitment is more welcome than ever because it is essential on two fronts: first, to accelerate progress in areas where we have seen improvements; and second, to remove the barriers that are slowing down access to services in some countries and among certain populations,” WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in the report, referring to the High Level Meeting on UHC. According to the report, “Progress has been greatest in lower income countries, mainly driven by interventions for infectious diseases and, to less extent, for reproductive, maternal, new-born and child health services. But the poorest countries and those affected by conflict generally lag far behind.” But the pace of progress on UHC has slowed since 2010. Based on current trends, by 2030 only 39%- 63% of the global population would be covered for essential health services, the report projects. “Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate – and coverage needs to double – to reach the SDG target of UHC for all by 2030.” In addition, levels of catastrophic health expenditures (SDG indicator 3.8.2), which represent out-of-pocket spending in proportion to household income, rose continuously from 2000 to 2015. Nearly a billion people spent more than 10% of household income on health in 2015, and over 200 million spent more than 25%, the report found. Experts Speak on Report, High Level Meeting The report comes against a backdrop of a UN General Assembly where the UHC meeting is a key highlight, said WHO officials. In fact, this may be the first time the UN General Assembly has spent so much of its session on health and health-related climate issues, said WHO Chief of Staff Bernhard Schwartlander at last week’s press briefing. “I think it is clear health is at the core of the Sustainable Development Agenda,” Schwartlander said. “In many ways, it’s a docking station for development overall for many other of the Development Goals, and UHC in a sense brings it all together.” “The good news is that all around the world, across all income groups, health service coverage is improving, has improved in this time period. Unfortunately, the rate of progress is declining, in relation to issues such as non-communicable diseases, limitations in health systems, and the fact that the group of lower income countries are falling tragically behind,” Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, told reporters. Reaching the “Natural Limit” of the Previous Global Health Model? “In many ways, we may have reached the natural limit of our previous global health model,” he said. “We see what is left in terms of coverage are some of the hardest countries – fragile states in particular – the poorest and most vulnerable, and also some of the hardest to reach people within countries: the rural poor, the peri-urban poor, for example,” he added. On financial hardship, on one hand the world is getting richer, and overall poverty rates are declining, he said. But poverty related to health care expenditure is actually increasing. “So the improvements in service coverage are coming at a real cost to individuals and their families,” said Salama. “This cost is measured by out-of-pocket expenditures, which are increasing. One way we measure that is catastrophic expenditures, households that are spending over 10% or 25% of their overall income or consumption on basic health care. And they are both increasing.” Both of these problems can be addressed by universal health coverage, the “cornerstone” of UHC as argued in the report, said Salama. On the price tag for UHC, he said, “Even though it seems like a large sum, we know that most countries can afford to do this based on their domestic resources. Only a handful of countries require international aid in order to scale up their primary health care.” “If we do this, we will have up to 5 billion more people receiving UHC by 2030, and will save up to 100 million lives,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said that “a lot of good progress has been made,” but added that “it is quite shocking” to see the increasing number of people who are at risk of poverty due to health spending. “And even in high-income countries where we have the lowest exposure to such risks, there has been a growth in the share and the number of people who spend large proportions of their household budgets on health. The out-of-pocket expenditures are mainly for pharmaceuticals and out-patient care, she said. While high-income countries score better overall in terms of access to services, there remain many important gaps, she said, particularly in relation to preventative services, especially for the poorest. And there are inequalities which persist, such as at-risk women not getting breast cancer screenings. “Make the Last Mile the First Mile” Speaking at the same press briefing, Stefan Swartling Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, stressed the importance of primary health care as a cornerstone of universal coverage. “As a parent, what I need whether I’m rich or poor is local access to good quality health services that I can afford. That service is primary health care, it’s not the big expensive hospital which is far away,” he said, adding that primary health care (PHC) can take care of 80-90% of a country’s healthcare needs. “My message is that we need to make the last mile [to the household door] the first mile,” Peterson said. PHC is the pathway to reach UHC, and it is “very exciting,” he said to see the digital innovations that can deliver PHC more effectively. “This is really the cutting edge of health care delivery.” Muhammad Pate, Global Director for Health, Nutrition and Population at the World Bank, stressed that UHC is key to human capital accumulation. It drives labour mobility, job creation, and also mitigates the risk of pandemics and other health emergencies, he said. While primary health care is the cornerstone for UHC, it needs to include access to essential drugs, he said, noting that costly drugs are a key driver of catastrophic health expenses. And such access needs to include not only drugs to treat common infectious diseases and maternal health conditions, but also the most prevalent NCDs, including mental health conditions. On financial protection, Pate said increasing domestic resources is necessary but it is not sufficient by itself to improve financial protection. How domestic resources are organized is key, he said. The World Bank is working with over 100 countries to leverage investments toward UHC, and progress needs to be accelerated. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, focused on areas where there are gaps in data and in services, the first being maternal/newborn/children health, where he noted that low-income countries continue to suffer from high rates of maternal and child mortality. More attention is needed to areas such as reproductive health, as well as to exploring why some women don’t use maternal/newborn or reproductive health services, due to social and gender concerns. “The improvements will be accelerated if we pay attention to the human rights of girls and women to make decisions over their own bodies and strategically,” he said. Kalasa also mentioned the “population dynamic” placing a burden on health systems as the global population is expected to reach 8.5 billion by 2030 and will also be changing in terms of age, mobility and urbanization. Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC is expected to be filled with grand statements, but it will remain to be seen what concrete commitments are made during this General Assembly, and how they will be implemented going forward. Image Credits: UN Photo/Marco Dormino, WHO. WHO Launches “Clean Air Coalition”; New Clean Air Fund To Be Announced Tomorrow 22/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – WHO said Sunday that it was launching a “Clean Air Coalition” led by the Governments of Spain and Peru, while a group of philanthropic organizations and foundations were poised to launch a new “Clean Air Fund” at Monday’s Climate Summit to spur investment in reducing sources of air pollution, which also contribute to climate change. A factory in the United States emitting smoke into the atmosphere. Some 29 countries and over 50 subnational entities have pledged to join the coalition committed to achieving healthy air quality by 2030, as part of their Climate Summit pledges, said Spain’s Health Minister María Luisa Carcedo, speaking at a WHO-organized side event on Sunday, the day before the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit brings together heads of state. The Clean Air Coalition is also being supported by the UN Secretary General’s Office and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition of UN Environment, said WHO’s Director of Public Health and Environment, Maria Neira. As for the new Clean Air Fund being formally launched tomorrow, Executive Director Jane Burston, said that the fund brings together “a group of like-minded philanthropic foundations” which have recognized that tackling air pollution will have “huge benefits for health as well as for climate.” “Clean Air Fund” launch announced at a WHO-sponsored side event. Burston said that a report being published by the new fund tomorrow surveyed the funding landscape and found that philanthropic investment in air quality initiatives is disproportionately low in comparison to the burden disease caused by air pollution – which is estimated to kill some 7 million people around the world every year. Additionally, the report found that most money is spent only in a few countries – even though WHO estimates that over 90% of people around the world breathe unhealthy air. “As a result of very limited funding on air quality, deaths from outdoor air pollution and ozone alone are forecast to double by 2050… we just cannot let that happen,” Burston said. She said that the new Clean Air Fund aims to support projects that “democratize” air quality data, making knowledge about air quality more widely accessible to large numbers of people in cities, through projects such as the Breathe London project. Breathe London has created a network of mobile sensors that allow children to decide how best to walk to school and parents to identify pollution hot spots. The new Clean Air Fund will also support “ambitious local government action,” Burston added, noting that they were working with cities that are part of the C-40 network to broaden air quality monitoring as well as with Pure Earth on a mapping of potential air quality interventions and documentation of how those support climate and health goals. Although she did not put a dollar amount, more details of the Fund are to be revealed Monday. Observers predicted that it would amount to an investment of tens of millions of dollars in new air quality efforts. Any investment, said Burston, would be starting from the current, “incredibly low base” of financial commitments to better air quality. “We don’t have anywhere the basis that we need to tackle the crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/John Isaac. Thousands “Walk The Talk” At Event To Raise Awareness For Universal Health Coverage 22/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY – Thousands of people attended a Sunday morning walk/run event here in Central Park to raise awareness for Universal Health Coverage, co-hosted by the World Health Organization and the City of New York. The “Walk the Talk: Healthcare for All Challenge” kicks off a week of high-level talks at the 74th United Nations General Assembly, including tomorrow’s long-anticipated High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as well as the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit. Participants mill around Central Park at “Walk the Talk.” “Today we are walking for our own health. But we are also marching to demand health for all,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, at the opening of the event. The event brought together both New York locals, UN officials, and people from all around the world to commit to health and wellness on an individual and global level. Staff from UN offices around the world such as UNICEF, WHO’s Western Pacific Regional Office and Pan-American Health Organization attended the event, and many major global health organizations such as Vital Strategies also showed up to support. A number of world leaders also participated in the fun-run, including the President of Palau, Thomas Remengesau Jr., and Norway’s Minister of Health, Bent Høie. The event was positioned around the larger conversation underway this week at the UN regarding both UHC and action on climate change. Ricky Kej, Grammy-award winning musician, shares the stage with a multicultural ensemble at “Walk the Talk.” Grammy-winning artist and activist Ricky Kej performed at the closing ceremony, raising awareness on climate change and hearing loss in youth. WHO estimates that over 1 billion youth are at risk of hearing loss from unsafe listening devices. Other speakers reiterated the challenges to achieving universal health coverage. “We are not doing enough to safeguard the future of our children, not when there is very little being done when young people reach the age of 10,” said Zoleka Mandela, activist and granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, pointing to gaps in access in healthcare, and neglect of sexual and reproductive health, injuries, and non-communicable diseases on the adolescent health agenda. Zoleka Mandela, granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, calls for a Global Adolescent Summit. Barely 2% of current global health funding is targeted towards adolescent health. Overall, some 51-67% percent of the world’s population does not have access to universal health coverage, according to a new report released today by the World Health Organization. Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former director-general of the WHO and a founding member of the group of statesmen and stateswomen known as “The Elders”, pointed to the United States’ lack of publicly-funded healthcare and urged states to fulfill their responsibilities to “provide effective and comprehensive public health care to all citizens.” European Union Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis gave a rousing speech along similar lines, urging US participants to push for higher health coverage and “make this country great again.” Dr. Tedros ended the event by reiterating that universal health coverage is a “political issue.” “By walking today,” he said, “We are asking our world leaders to honor their commitment on September 2015 when they agreed to achieve universal health coverage for all by 2030.” Image Credits: Gabby Stern/WHO, Ricky Kej, G Ren/HP-Watch. Civil Society Takes Charge On Climate Action As Governments Waver 21/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Youth leaders from around the world clamored for more action on climate change Saturday at a first-ever United Nation’s Youth Climate Summit – even as the actual government commitments lined up for Monday’s formal meeting with heads of state appeared likely fall far short of making the dramatic changes that scientists say would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5° C. Youth activists and the Secretary-General of the UN give opening remarks at the Youth Climate Summit. Sources told Health Policy Watch that some 50 national commitments were due to be announced Monday at the UN Climate Summit. But these would not be sufficient to sharply reduce the pace of climate change that right now has the world heading for 3°C or higher temperatures by the end of the century. That, health experts have warned, would trigger an unprecedented spiral of threats to human health, food security, disease transmission and to the very survival of small island states and coastal communities. (Left to Right) Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC executive secretary, WHO’s Maria Neira, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. Against the dark scientific predictions, Saturday’s assembly was a further reflection of how civil society organizations of all stripes – from climate researchers to public health advocates, students and urban leaders– have been mobilizing to seize initiative where governments have so far failed. On Thursday, a consortium of scientists published The Exponential Roadmap, outlining 36 strategies that could slash greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 if they were scaled up rapidly. These 36 solutions – ranging from solar and wind to electric bikes, commercial shipping and reduced red meat consumption – could “stabilize earth’s temperatures and significantly reduce risks to societies” said the authors of the report by the Future Earth consortium, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. “This is now a race against time, but businesses and even entire industries have made many significant transitions in less than 10 years,” said report author Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of Future Earth, an international research programme, in a press release. Saturday’s Climate Youth Summit also came in the wake of Friday’s historic global climate strike that mobilized 4 million people worldwide, many from youth-led movements, who demanded more accountability from government and industry leaders. “I want the leaders of the world to respect the rights of future generations, respect the right to a habitable planet… We are not insurance policies, We are communities, we are human communities. Is it really too much to ask you to walk the talk?” Kamal Karishma Kumar, a young activist from the island of Fiji, a country threatened by rising sea levels, told the world leaders at the Youth Summit inside UN Headquarters. Youth participants also demanded greater accountability from industry representatives who were present at the Summit. One activist challenged Microsoft’s Chief Environmental Officer, Lucas Jappa, over recent business deals with fossil fuel companies. “If Microsoft is so committed to sustainability, why did Microsoft partner with Chevron and Schlumberger this week to accelerate oil extraction?… Do you care more about profit than you care about us?” she asked. Making new business deals with the fossil fuels industry is an issue that “the entire tech sector and everybody who is living in the world today, which is predicated upon an oil and gas economy, has to answer,” Microsoft’s Jappa responded. “It’s a conversation that we’re having inside the company and it’s one that I think you’ll be hearing more about, both from Microsoft and our peers in the broader tech sector…. Know that Microsoft will be engaging in this dialogue moving forward,” Jappa added. Monday’s Summit Portrayed as a “Beginning” not a “Milestone” The Youth Summit took place against a background of sober recognition that the level of commitment from global leaders moving into Monday’s high-level Climate Action Summit was likely to be muted. And leaders were busy recasting the Monday meeting as the beginning and not the end of the process. “We have 50 commitments, that is not negligible,” said Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “There is nothing in life that is black or white, everything is shades of grey and I am absolutely sure that this [summit] will take us to the next level,” Figueres, now a lead actor in Mission 2020, a partner organisation in the Exponential Roadmap, told Health Policy Watch in a brief interview. Figueres said she had been “inspired and called to account” by young people speaking out at events such as the Youth Summit, “They have said our generation has not done our job – nobody is exempt, everybody has to do something.” UN Secretary-General, António Guterres. The youth movement and leaders such as Greta Thunberg will be remembered as making “the biggest difference” in the climate movement, said Norway’s Environment and Climate Minister, Ola Elvestuen, at the UN meeting. Speaking at today’s Youth Summit event, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, sounded a note of hope. “When I started two years ago… I felt very discouraged in relation to the perspectives about climate action. We were already facing a climate emergency… At the same time, there was an apathy, there was a sense of difficulty in getting people to act.” Now, he said, public sentiment is finally turning around. But asked later by Health Policy Watch if he had “high hopes” that Monday would be a milestone, The Secretary General paused and said only “I have… hopes.” Health Mobilizing More Aggressively Recognizing that climate impacts people’s health can also help motivate climate action, said Thunberg upon a visit to a “Pollution Pods” exhibit on the UN lawn, sponsored by the World Health Organization. The traveling exhibit, by British artist Michael Pinsky, recreates the experience of pollution in five cities of the world, ranging from highly polluted Delhi and Beijing to moderately polluted London and Oslo. Greta Thunberg at WHO’s Pollution Pods exhibit. “If we can connect the climate crisis with air pollution, it is just so connected and we cannot solve one without solving the other,” said Thunberg. WHO has been leading research and policy synthesis on climate and health issues for nearly two decades. Now some of the largest humanitarian and health civil society organizations are speaking up more assertively. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) both issued statements just ahead of the Summit about the urgency of addressing climate change. The International Federation of the Red Cross report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, warned that by 2050 some 200 million people a year will be in need of humanitarian assistance due to climate related events, double today’s level. Costs of responding to humanitarian crises will balloon to USD$20 billion. The global health and humanitarian aid communities are facing a “climate emergency,” said the Executive Director of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, in another statement, issued on Thursday. Vital Strategies, a longtime health actor on tobacco control, NCDs, and traffic injuries has also become active in the climate space (see interview). And dedicated NGOs, such as Health Care without Harm, and the Global Climate and Health Alliance, have also appeared on the scene to address health workers about the urgent health impacts of climate change, as well as to advocate for reducing the climate footprint of the health sector, which is responsible for as much as 4.5% of climate emissions, according to a recent report. New Roadmap Provides 36 Solutions to Cut Climate Emissions 50% by 2030 Worldwide Among scientists, as well, there is a stronger note of activism, as reflected in reports such as the Exponential Roadmap. The report identifies a number of “tipping points” it says could accelerate transformation toward a more sustainable global economy, including: Low cost solar, wind, and battery technologies, which are on profitable, exponential trajectories that if sustained, will be enough to halve emissions from electricity generation by 2030; Electric vehicle growth, which has the potential to reach a 90% market share by 2030 if sustained, but only if strong policies support this direction; Growing social movements changing the public conversation in parallel with companies and cities stepping up climate action; Emerging political support for more ambitious targets, for example countries such as the UK, France, Norway and Sweden adopting laws to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier. Along with that, digital technology could support a rapid transformation of economic systems – although if it is not managed, digital transformation also could drive emissions higher, the report’s authors warn. Of the report, Figueres said, “I see all evidence that social and economic tipping points are aligning. We can now say the next decade has the potential to see the fastest economic transition in history. The 2019 Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for the necessary journey to net-zero emissions.” Manuel Pugal-Vidal, leader of the climate and energy practice at WWF, a partner of the report said in a statement, “Governments must introduce national targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 with targets to cut emissions 50% by 2030. Immediate removal of fossil-fuel subsidies is a priority. Yet policies must be equitable and fair or risk failure.” “Developed nations with significant historic emissions also have a responsibility to reduce emissions faster. Cities and states – not only countries – will also be important change makers,” he adds. More from HPW’s interview with Maria Neira, Christiana Figueres, and Michelle Bachelet: https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.45.40-PM-2.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.57.10-PM.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.53.47-PM.mp4 For more about the story of the “Pollution Pods” see here. Grace Ren also contributed to this story. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, Fletcher/HP-Watch. “We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Progress On Universal Health Coverage Lagging: WHO Report Released Ahead Of High Level UHC Meeting 22/09/2019 William New NEW YORK CITY – Despite advances in Universal Health Coverage (UHC), as many as 5 billion people would be left without full access to healthcare in 2030 at the present rate of progress, according to a new report led by the World Health Organization. And financial protections that shield families from catastrophic health expenses have been eroded in some countries, says the report, released just ahead of Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC here at UN Headquarters. The Universal Health Coverage Global Monitoring Report 2019 calls on governments to redouble the pace of expanding coverage, and commit to spending at least 1% of their GDP on primary health care. The report was published just ahead of Monday’s expected adoption of a UN political declaration on UHC, committing UN member states to ensure that people worldwide can access quality healthcare affordably by 2030. “Despite the progress, UHC coverage is stalled or not on track, and only about half the world population will be covered in 2030. Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate, and we need to double the coverage in order to reach the target of UHC for all by 2030,” said Samira Asma, WHO Assistant Director-General for Data, Analytics and Delivery, in a press briefing last week, just ahead of the start of the 74th UN General Assembly, where the UHC High Level Meeting is taking place. People wait in line for medical consultations in Bamako, Mali. The report was prepared by the WHO with contributions from the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations Population Fund, and UNICEF. The report was released today. Primary health care is another key focus of the report’s findings. “Investing an additional US$ 200 billion a year on scaling up primary health care across low and middle-income countries would potentially save 60 million lives, increase average life expectancy by 3.7 years by 2030, and contribute significantly to socio-economic development,” WHO said in a press release. “It would represent a 5% increase on the US$ 7.5 trillion already spent on health globally each year.” The 163-page report filled with the latest-available data and analysis shows an increase in the “UHC service coverage index” (SCI) measuring progress on SDG indicator 3.8.1 (financial protection and coverage of essential health services). The SCI rose from a global average of 45 (of 100) in 2000 to 66 in 2017, and all regions and income groups recorded gains, according to the report. “This level of political commitment is more welcome than ever because it is essential on two fronts: first, to accelerate progress in areas where we have seen improvements; and second, to remove the barriers that are slowing down access to services in some countries and among certain populations,” WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in the report, referring to the High Level Meeting on UHC. According to the report, “Progress has been greatest in lower income countries, mainly driven by interventions for infectious diseases and, to less extent, for reproductive, maternal, new-born and child health services. But the poorest countries and those affected by conflict generally lag far behind.” But the pace of progress on UHC has slowed since 2010. Based on current trends, by 2030 only 39%- 63% of the global population would be covered for essential health services, the report projects. “Therefore, progress must markedly accelerate – and coverage needs to double – to reach the SDG target of UHC for all by 2030.” In addition, levels of catastrophic health expenditures (SDG indicator 3.8.2), which represent out-of-pocket spending in proportion to household income, rose continuously from 2000 to 2015. Nearly a billion people spent more than 10% of household income on health in 2015, and over 200 million spent more than 25%, the report found. Experts Speak on Report, High Level Meeting The report comes against a backdrop of a UN General Assembly where the UHC meeting is a key highlight, said WHO officials. In fact, this may be the first time the UN General Assembly has spent so much of its session on health and health-related climate issues, said WHO Chief of Staff Bernhard Schwartlander at last week’s press briefing. “I think it is clear health is at the core of the Sustainable Development Agenda,” Schwartlander said. “In many ways, it’s a docking station for development overall for many other of the Development Goals, and UHC in a sense brings it all together.” “The good news is that all around the world, across all income groups, health service coverage is improving, has improved in this time period. Unfortunately, the rate of progress is declining, in relation to issues such as non-communicable diseases, limitations in health systems, and the fact that the group of lower income countries are falling tragically behind,” Peter Salama, WHO’s executive director of Universal Health Coverage & Life Course, told reporters. Reaching the “Natural Limit” of the Previous Global Health Model? “In many ways, we may have reached the natural limit of our previous global health model,” he said. “We see what is left in terms of coverage are some of the hardest countries – fragile states in particular – the poorest and most vulnerable, and also some of the hardest to reach people within countries: the rural poor, the peri-urban poor, for example,” he added. On financial hardship, on one hand the world is getting richer, and overall poverty rates are declining, he said. But poverty related to health care expenditure is actually increasing. “So the improvements in service coverage are coming at a real cost to individuals and their families,” said Salama. “This cost is measured by out-of-pocket expenditures, which are increasing. One way we measure that is catastrophic expenditures, households that are spending over 10% or 25% of their overall income or consumption on basic health care. And they are both increasing.” Both of these problems can be addressed by universal health coverage, the “cornerstone” of UHC as argued in the report, said Salama. On the price tag for UHC, he said, “Even though it seems like a large sum, we know that most countries can afford to do this based on their domestic resources. Only a handful of countries require international aid in order to scale up their primary health care.” “If we do this, we will have up to 5 billion more people receiving UHC by 2030, and will save up to 100 million lives,” he said. Francesca Colombo, Head of the Health Division at OECD, said that “a lot of good progress has been made,” but added that “it is quite shocking” to see the increasing number of people who are at risk of poverty due to health spending. “And even in high-income countries where we have the lowest exposure to such risks, there has been a growth in the share and the number of people who spend large proportions of their household budgets on health. The out-of-pocket expenditures are mainly for pharmaceuticals and out-patient care, she said. While high-income countries score better overall in terms of access to services, there remain many important gaps, she said, particularly in relation to preventative services, especially for the poorest. And there are inequalities which persist, such as at-risk women not getting breast cancer screenings. “Make the Last Mile the First Mile” Speaking at the same press briefing, Stefan Swartling Peterson, chief of health at UNICEF, stressed the importance of primary health care as a cornerstone of universal coverage. “As a parent, what I need whether I’m rich or poor is local access to good quality health services that I can afford. That service is primary health care, it’s not the big expensive hospital which is far away,” he said, adding that primary health care (PHC) can take care of 80-90% of a country’s healthcare needs. “My message is that we need to make the last mile [to the household door] the first mile,” Peterson said. PHC is the pathway to reach UHC, and it is “very exciting,” he said to see the digital innovations that can deliver PHC more effectively. “This is really the cutting edge of health care delivery.” Muhammad Pate, Global Director for Health, Nutrition and Population at the World Bank, stressed that UHC is key to human capital accumulation. It drives labour mobility, job creation, and also mitigates the risk of pandemics and other health emergencies, he said. While primary health care is the cornerstone for UHC, it needs to include access to essential drugs, he said, noting that costly drugs are a key driver of catastrophic health expenses. And such access needs to include not only drugs to treat common infectious diseases and maternal health conditions, but also the most prevalent NCDs, including mental health conditions. On financial protection, Pate said increasing domestic resources is necessary but it is not sufficient by itself to improve financial protection. How domestic resources are organized is key, he said. The World Bank is working with over 100 countries to leverage investments toward UHC, and progress needs to be accelerated. Benoit Kalasa, Director, Technical Division at UNFPA, focused on areas where there are gaps in data and in services, the first being maternal/newborn/children health, where he noted that low-income countries continue to suffer from high rates of maternal and child mortality. More attention is needed to areas such as reproductive health, as well as to exploring why some women don’t use maternal/newborn or reproductive health services, due to social and gender concerns. “The improvements will be accelerated if we pay attention to the human rights of girls and women to make decisions over their own bodies and strategically,” he said. Kalasa also mentioned the “population dynamic” placing a burden on health systems as the global population is expected to reach 8.5 billion by 2030 and will also be changing in terms of age, mobility and urbanization. Monday’s High Level Meeting on UHC is expected to be filled with grand statements, but it will remain to be seen what concrete commitments are made during this General Assembly, and how they will be implemented going forward. Image Credits: UN Photo/Marco Dormino, WHO. WHO Launches “Clean Air Coalition”; New Clean Air Fund To Be Announced Tomorrow 22/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – WHO said Sunday that it was launching a “Clean Air Coalition” led by the Governments of Spain and Peru, while a group of philanthropic organizations and foundations were poised to launch a new “Clean Air Fund” at Monday’s Climate Summit to spur investment in reducing sources of air pollution, which also contribute to climate change. A factory in the United States emitting smoke into the atmosphere. Some 29 countries and over 50 subnational entities have pledged to join the coalition committed to achieving healthy air quality by 2030, as part of their Climate Summit pledges, said Spain’s Health Minister María Luisa Carcedo, speaking at a WHO-organized side event on Sunday, the day before the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit brings together heads of state. The Clean Air Coalition is also being supported by the UN Secretary General’s Office and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition of UN Environment, said WHO’s Director of Public Health and Environment, Maria Neira. As for the new Clean Air Fund being formally launched tomorrow, Executive Director Jane Burston, said that the fund brings together “a group of like-minded philanthropic foundations” which have recognized that tackling air pollution will have “huge benefits for health as well as for climate.” “Clean Air Fund” launch announced at a WHO-sponsored side event. Burston said that a report being published by the new fund tomorrow surveyed the funding landscape and found that philanthropic investment in air quality initiatives is disproportionately low in comparison to the burden disease caused by air pollution – which is estimated to kill some 7 million people around the world every year. Additionally, the report found that most money is spent only in a few countries – even though WHO estimates that over 90% of people around the world breathe unhealthy air. “As a result of very limited funding on air quality, deaths from outdoor air pollution and ozone alone are forecast to double by 2050… we just cannot let that happen,” Burston said. She said that the new Clean Air Fund aims to support projects that “democratize” air quality data, making knowledge about air quality more widely accessible to large numbers of people in cities, through projects such as the Breathe London project. Breathe London has created a network of mobile sensors that allow children to decide how best to walk to school and parents to identify pollution hot spots. The new Clean Air Fund will also support “ambitious local government action,” Burston added, noting that they were working with cities that are part of the C-40 network to broaden air quality monitoring as well as with Pure Earth on a mapping of potential air quality interventions and documentation of how those support climate and health goals. Although she did not put a dollar amount, more details of the Fund are to be revealed Monday. Observers predicted that it would amount to an investment of tens of millions of dollars in new air quality efforts. Any investment, said Burston, would be starting from the current, “incredibly low base” of financial commitments to better air quality. “We don’t have anywhere the basis that we need to tackle the crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/John Isaac. Thousands “Walk The Talk” At Event To Raise Awareness For Universal Health Coverage 22/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY – Thousands of people attended a Sunday morning walk/run event here in Central Park to raise awareness for Universal Health Coverage, co-hosted by the World Health Organization and the City of New York. The “Walk the Talk: Healthcare for All Challenge” kicks off a week of high-level talks at the 74th United Nations General Assembly, including tomorrow’s long-anticipated High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as well as the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit. Participants mill around Central Park at “Walk the Talk.” “Today we are walking for our own health. But we are also marching to demand health for all,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, at the opening of the event. The event brought together both New York locals, UN officials, and people from all around the world to commit to health and wellness on an individual and global level. Staff from UN offices around the world such as UNICEF, WHO’s Western Pacific Regional Office and Pan-American Health Organization attended the event, and many major global health organizations such as Vital Strategies also showed up to support. A number of world leaders also participated in the fun-run, including the President of Palau, Thomas Remengesau Jr., and Norway’s Minister of Health, Bent Høie. The event was positioned around the larger conversation underway this week at the UN regarding both UHC and action on climate change. Ricky Kej, Grammy-award winning musician, shares the stage with a multicultural ensemble at “Walk the Talk.” Grammy-winning artist and activist Ricky Kej performed at the closing ceremony, raising awareness on climate change and hearing loss in youth. WHO estimates that over 1 billion youth are at risk of hearing loss from unsafe listening devices. Other speakers reiterated the challenges to achieving universal health coverage. “We are not doing enough to safeguard the future of our children, not when there is very little being done when young people reach the age of 10,” said Zoleka Mandela, activist and granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, pointing to gaps in access in healthcare, and neglect of sexual and reproductive health, injuries, and non-communicable diseases on the adolescent health agenda. Zoleka Mandela, granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, calls for a Global Adolescent Summit. Barely 2% of current global health funding is targeted towards adolescent health. Overall, some 51-67% percent of the world’s population does not have access to universal health coverage, according to a new report released today by the World Health Organization. Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former director-general of the WHO and a founding member of the group of statesmen and stateswomen known as “The Elders”, pointed to the United States’ lack of publicly-funded healthcare and urged states to fulfill their responsibilities to “provide effective and comprehensive public health care to all citizens.” European Union Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis gave a rousing speech along similar lines, urging US participants to push for higher health coverage and “make this country great again.” Dr. Tedros ended the event by reiterating that universal health coverage is a “political issue.” “By walking today,” he said, “We are asking our world leaders to honor their commitment on September 2015 when they agreed to achieve universal health coverage for all by 2030.” Image Credits: Gabby Stern/WHO, Ricky Kej, G Ren/HP-Watch. Civil Society Takes Charge On Climate Action As Governments Waver 21/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Youth leaders from around the world clamored for more action on climate change Saturday at a first-ever United Nation’s Youth Climate Summit – even as the actual government commitments lined up for Monday’s formal meeting with heads of state appeared likely fall far short of making the dramatic changes that scientists say would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5° C. Youth activists and the Secretary-General of the UN give opening remarks at the Youth Climate Summit. Sources told Health Policy Watch that some 50 national commitments were due to be announced Monday at the UN Climate Summit. But these would not be sufficient to sharply reduce the pace of climate change that right now has the world heading for 3°C or higher temperatures by the end of the century. That, health experts have warned, would trigger an unprecedented spiral of threats to human health, food security, disease transmission and to the very survival of small island states and coastal communities. (Left to Right) Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC executive secretary, WHO’s Maria Neira, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. Against the dark scientific predictions, Saturday’s assembly was a further reflection of how civil society organizations of all stripes – from climate researchers to public health advocates, students and urban leaders– have been mobilizing to seize initiative where governments have so far failed. On Thursday, a consortium of scientists published The Exponential Roadmap, outlining 36 strategies that could slash greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 if they were scaled up rapidly. These 36 solutions – ranging from solar and wind to electric bikes, commercial shipping and reduced red meat consumption – could “stabilize earth’s temperatures and significantly reduce risks to societies” said the authors of the report by the Future Earth consortium, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. “This is now a race against time, but businesses and even entire industries have made many significant transitions in less than 10 years,” said report author Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of Future Earth, an international research programme, in a press release. Saturday’s Climate Youth Summit also came in the wake of Friday’s historic global climate strike that mobilized 4 million people worldwide, many from youth-led movements, who demanded more accountability from government and industry leaders. “I want the leaders of the world to respect the rights of future generations, respect the right to a habitable planet… We are not insurance policies, We are communities, we are human communities. Is it really too much to ask you to walk the talk?” Kamal Karishma Kumar, a young activist from the island of Fiji, a country threatened by rising sea levels, told the world leaders at the Youth Summit inside UN Headquarters. Youth participants also demanded greater accountability from industry representatives who were present at the Summit. One activist challenged Microsoft’s Chief Environmental Officer, Lucas Jappa, over recent business deals with fossil fuel companies. “If Microsoft is so committed to sustainability, why did Microsoft partner with Chevron and Schlumberger this week to accelerate oil extraction?… Do you care more about profit than you care about us?” she asked. Making new business deals with the fossil fuels industry is an issue that “the entire tech sector and everybody who is living in the world today, which is predicated upon an oil and gas economy, has to answer,” Microsoft’s Jappa responded. “It’s a conversation that we’re having inside the company and it’s one that I think you’ll be hearing more about, both from Microsoft and our peers in the broader tech sector…. Know that Microsoft will be engaging in this dialogue moving forward,” Jappa added. Monday’s Summit Portrayed as a “Beginning” not a “Milestone” The Youth Summit took place against a background of sober recognition that the level of commitment from global leaders moving into Monday’s high-level Climate Action Summit was likely to be muted. And leaders were busy recasting the Monday meeting as the beginning and not the end of the process. “We have 50 commitments, that is not negligible,” said Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “There is nothing in life that is black or white, everything is shades of grey and I am absolutely sure that this [summit] will take us to the next level,” Figueres, now a lead actor in Mission 2020, a partner organisation in the Exponential Roadmap, told Health Policy Watch in a brief interview. Figueres said she had been “inspired and called to account” by young people speaking out at events such as the Youth Summit, “They have said our generation has not done our job – nobody is exempt, everybody has to do something.” UN Secretary-General, António Guterres. The youth movement and leaders such as Greta Thunberg will be remembered as making “the biggest difference” in the climate movement, said Norway’s Environment and Climate Minister, Ola Elvestuen, at the UN meeting. Speaking at today’s Youth Summit event, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, sounded a note of hope. “When I started two years ago… I felt very discouraged in relation to the perspectives about climate action. We were already facing a climate emergency… At the same time, there was an apathy, there was a sense of difficulty in getting people to act.” Now, he said, public sentiment is finally turning around. But asked later by Health Policy Watch if he had “high hopes” that Monday would be a milestone, The Secretary General paused and said only “I have… hopes.” Health Mobilizing More Aggressively Recognizing that climate impacts people’s health can also help motivate climate action, said Thunberg upon a visit to a “Pollution Pods” exhibit on the UN lawn, sponsored by the World Health Organization. The traveling exhibit, by British artist Michael Pinsky, recreates the experience of pollution in five cities of the world, ranging from highly polluted Delhi and Beijing to moderately polluted London and Oslo. Greta Thunberg at WHO’s Pollution Pods exhibit. “If we can connect the climate crisis with air pollution, it is just so connected and we cannot solve one without solving the other,” said Thunberg. WHO has been leading research and policy synthesis on climate and health issues for nearly two decades. Now some of the largest humanitarian and health civil society organizations are speaking up more assertively. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) both issued statements just ahead of the Summit about the urgency of addressing climate change. The International Federation of the Red Cross report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, warned that by 2050 some 200 million people a year will be in need of humanitarian assistance due to climate related events, double today’s level. Costs of responding to humanitarian crises will balloon to USD$20 billion. The global health and humanitarian aid communities are facing a “climate emergency,” said the Executive Director of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, in another statement, issued on Thursday. Vital Strategies, a longtime health actor on tobacco control, NCDs, and traffic injuries has also become active in the climate space (see interview). And dedicated NGOs, such as Health Care without Harm, and the Global Climate and Health Alliance, have also appeared on the scene to address health workers about the urgent health impacts of climate change, as well as to advocate for reducing the climate footprint of the health sector, which is responsible for as much as 4.5% of climate emissions, according to a recent report. New Roadmap Provides 36 Solutions to Cut Climate Emissions 50% by 2030 Worldwide Among scientists, as well, there is a stronger note of activism, as reflected in reports such as the Exponential Roadmap. The report identifies a number of “tipping points” it says could accelerate transformation toward a more sustainable global economy, including: Low cost solar, wind, and battery technologies, which are on profitable, exponential trajectories that if sustained, will be enough to halve emissions from electricity generation by 2030; Electric vehicle growth, which has the potential to reach a 90% market share by 2030 if sustained, but only if strong policies support this direction; Growing social movements changing the public conversation in parallel with companies and cities stepping up climate action; Emerging political support for more ambitious targets, for example countries such as the UK, France, Norway and Sweden adopting laws to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier. Along with that, digital technology could support a rapid transformation of economic systems – although if it is not managed, digital transformation also could drive emissions higher, the report’s authors warn. Of the report, Figueres said, “I see all evidence that social and economic tipping points are aligning. We can now say the next decade has the potential to see the fastest economic transition in history. The 2019 Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for the necessary journey to net-zero emissions.” Manuel Pugal-Vidal, leader of the climate and energy practice at WWF, a partner of the report said in a statement, “Governments must introduce national targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 with targets to cut emissions 50% by 2030. Immediate removal of fossil-fuel subsidies is a priority. Yet policies must be equitable and fair or risk failure.” “Developed nations with significant historic emissions also have a responsibility to reduce emissions faster. Cities and states – not only countries – will also be important change makers,” he adds. More from HPW’s interview with Maria Neira, Christiana Figueres, and Michelle Bachelet: https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.45.40-PM-2.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.57.10-PM.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.53.47-PM.mp4 For more about the story of the “Pollution Pods” see here. Grace Ren also contributed to this story. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, Fletcher/HP-Watch. “We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
WHO Launches “Clean Air Coalition”; New Clean Air Fund To Be Announced Tomorrow 22/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – WHO said Sunday that it was launching a “Clean Air Coalition” led by the Governments of Spain and Peru, while a group of philanthropic organizations and foundations were poised to launch a new “Clean Air Fund” at Monday’s Climate Summit to spur investment in reducing sources of air pollution, which also contribute to climate change. A factory in the United States emitting smoke into the atmosphere. Some 29 countries and over 50 subnational entities have pledged to join the coalition committed to achieving healthy air quality by 2030, as part of their Climate Summit pledges, said Spain’s Health Minister María Luisa Carcedo, speaking at a WHO-organized side event on Sunday, the day before the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit brings together heads of state. The Clean Air Coalition is also being supported by the UN Secretary General’s Office and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition of UN Environment, said WHO’s Director of Public Health and Environment, Maria Neira. As for the new Clean Air Fund being formally launched tomorrow, Executive Director Jane Burston, said that the fund brings together “a group of like-minded philanthropic foundations” which have recognized that tackling air pollution will have “huge benefits for health as well as for climate.” “Clean Air Fund” launch announced at a WHO-sponsored side event. Burston said that a report being published by the new fund tomorrow surveyed the funding landscape and found that philanthropic investment in air quality initiatives is disproportionately low in comparison to the burden disease caused by air pollution – which is estimated to kill some 7 million people around the world every year. Additionally, the report found that most money is spent only in a few countries – even though WHO estimates that over 90% of people around the world breathe unhealthy air. “As a result of very limited funding on air quality, deaths from outdoor air pollution and ozone alone are forecast to double by 2050… we just cannot let that happen,” Burston said. She said that the new Clean Air Fund aims to support projects that “democratize” air quality data, making knowledge about air quality more widely accessible to large numbers of people in cities, through projects such as the Breathe London project. Breathe London has created a network of mobile sensors that allow children to decide how best to walk to school and parents to identify pollution hot spots. The new Clean Air Fund will also support “ambitious local government action,” Burston added, noting that they were working with cities that are part of the C-40 network to broaden air quality monitoring as well as with Pure Earth on a mapping of potential air quality interventions and documentation of how those support climate and health goals. Although she did not put a dollar amount, more details of the Fund are to be revealed Monday. Observers predicted that it would amount to an investment of tens of millions of dollars in new air quality efforts. Any investment, said Burston, would be starting from the current, “incredibly low base” of financial commitments to better air quality. “We don’t have anywhere the basis that we need to tackle the crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/John Isaac. Thousands “Walk The Talk” At Event To Raise Awareness For Universal Health Coverage 22/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY – Thousands of people attended a Sunday morning walk/run event here in Central Park to raise awareness for Universal Health Coverage, co-hosted by the World Health Organization and the City of New York. The “Walk the Talk: Healthcare for All Challenge” kicks off a week of high-level talks at the 74th United Nations General Assembly, including tomorrow’s long-anticipated High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as well as the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit. Participants mill around Central Park at “Walk the Talk.” “Today we are walking for our own health. But we are also marching to demand health for all,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, at the opening of the event. The event brought together both New York locals, UN officials, and people from all around the world to commit to health and wellness on an individual and global level. Staff from UN offices around the world such as UNICEF, WHO’s Western Pacific Regional Office and Pan-American Health Organization attended the event, and many major global health organizations such as Vital Strategies also showed up to support. A number of world leaders also participated in the fun-run, including the President of Palau, Thomas Remengesau Jr., and Norway’s Minister of Health, Bent Høie. The event was positioned around the larger conversation underway this week at the UN regarding both UHC and action on climate change. Ricky Kej, Grammy-award winning musician, shares the stage with a multicultural ensemble at “Walk the Talk.” Grammy-winning artist and activist Ricky Kej performed at the closing ceremony, raising awareness on climate change and hearing loss in youth. WHO estimates that over 1 billion youth are at risk of hearing loss from unsafe listening devices. Other speakers reiterated the challenges to achieving universal health coverage. “We are not doing enough to safeguard the future of our children, not when there is very little being done when young people reach the age of 10,” said Zoleka Mandela, activist and granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, pointing to gaps in access in healthcare, and neglect of sexual and reproductive health, injuries, and non-communicable diseases on the adolescent health agenda. Zoleka Mandela, granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, calls for a Global Adolescent Summit. Barely 2% of current global health funding is targeted towards adolescent health. Overall, some 51-67% percent of the world’s population does not have access to universal health coverage, according to a new report released today by the World Health Organization. Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former director-general of the WHO and a founding member of the group of statesmen and stateswomen known as “The Elders”, pointed to the United States’ lack of publicly-funded healthcare and urged states to fulfill their responsibilities to “provide effective and comprehensive public health care to all citizens.” European Union Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis gave a rousing speech along similar lines, urging US participants to push for higher health coverage and “make this country great again.” Dr. Tedros ended the event by reiterating that universal health coverage is a “political issue.” “By walking today,” he said, “We are asking our world leaders to honor their commitment on September 2015 when they agreed to achieve universal health coverage for all by 2030.” Image Credits: Gabby Stern/WHO, Ricky Kej, G Ren/HP-Watch. Civil Society Takes Charge On Climate Action As Governments Waver 21/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Youth leaders from around the world clamored for more action on climate change Saturday at a first-ever United Nation’s Youth Climate Summit – even as the actual government commitments lined up for Monday’s formal meeting with heads of state appeared likely fall far short of making the dramatic changes that scientists say would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5° C. Youth activists and the Secretary-General of the UN give opening remarks at the Youth Climate Summit. Sources told Health Policy Watch that some 50 national commitments were due to be announced Monday at the UN Climate Summit. But these would not be sufficient to sharply reduce the pace of climate change that right now has the world heading for 3°C or higher temperatures by the end of the century. That, health experts have warned, would trigger an unprecedented spiral of threats to human health, food security, disease transmission and to the very survival of small island states and coastal communities. (Left to Right) Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC executive secretary, WHO’s Maria Neira, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. Against the dark scientific predictions, Saturday’s assembly was a further reflection of how civil society organizations of all stripes – from climate researchers to public health advocates, students and urban leaders– have been mobilizing to seize initiative where governments have so far failed. On Thursday, a consortium of scientists published The Exponential Roadmap, outlining 36 strategies that could slash greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 if they were scaled up rapidly. These 36 solutions – ranging from solar and wind to electric bikes, commercial shipping and reduced red meat consumption – could “stabilize earth’s temperatures and significantly reduce risks to societies” said the authors of the report by the Future Earth consortium, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. “This is now a race against time, but businesses and even entire industries have made many significant transitions in less than 10 years,” said report author Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of Future Earth, an international research programme, in a press release. Saturday’s Climate Youth Summit also came in the wake of Friday’s historic global climate strike that mobilized 4 million people worldwide, many from youth-led movements, who demanded more accountability from government and industry leaders. “I want the leaders of the world to respect the rights of future generations, respect the right to a habitable planet… We are not insurance policies, We are communities, we are human communities. Is it really too much to ask you to walk the talk?” Kamal Karishma Kumar, a young activist from the island of Fiji, a country threatened by rising sea levels, told the world leaders at the Youth Summit inside UN Headquarters. Youth participants also demanded greater accountability from industry representatives who were present at the Summit. One activist challenged Microsoft’s Chief Environmental Officer, Lucas Jappa, over recent business deals with fossil fuel companies. “If Microsoft is so committed to sustainability, why did Microsoft partner with Chevron and Schlumberger this week to accelerate oil extraction?… Do you care more about profit than you care about us?” she asked. Making new business deals with the fossil fuels industry is an issue that “the entire tech sector and everybody who is living in the world today, which is predicated upon an oil and gas economy, has to answer,” Microsoft’s Jappa responded. “It’s a conversation that we’re having inside the company and it’s one that I think you’ll be hearing more about, both from Microsoft and our peers in the broader tech sector…. Know that Microsoft will be engaging in this dialogue moving forward,” Jappa added. Monday’s Summit Portrayed as a “Beginning” not a “Milestone” The Youth Summit took place against a background of sober recognition that the level of commitment from global leaders moving into Monday’s high-level Climate Action Summit was likely to be muted. And leaders were busy recasting the Monday meeting as the beginning and not the end of the process. “We have 50 commitments, that is not negligible,” said Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “There is nothing in life that is black or white, everything is shades of grey and I am absolutely sure that this [summit] will take us to the next level,” Figueres, now a lead actor in Mission 2020, a partner organisation in the Exponential Roadmap, told Health Policy Watch in a brief interview. Figueres said she had been “inspired and called to account” by young people speaking out at events such as the Youth Summit, “They have said our generation has not done our job – nobody is exempt, everybody has to do something.” UN Secretary-General, António Guterres. The youth movement and leaders such as Greta Thunberg will be remembered as making “the biggest difference” in the climate movement, said Norway’s Environment and Climate Minister, Ola Elvestuen, at the UN meeting. Speaking at today’s Youth Summit event, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, sounded a note of hope. “When I started two years ago… I felt very discouraged in relation to the perspectives about climate action. We were already facing a climate emergency… At the same time, there was an apathy, there was a sense of difficulty in getting people to act.” Now, he said, public sentiment is finally turning around. But asked later by Health Policy Watch if he had “high hopes” that Monday would be a milestone, The Secretary General paused and said only “I have… hopes.” Health Mobilizing More Aggressively Recognizing that climate impacts people’s health can also help motivate climate action, said Thunberg upon a visit to a “Pollution Pods” exhibit on the UN lawn, sponsored by the World Health Organization. The traveling exhibit, by British artist Michael Pinsky, recreates the experience of pollution in five cities of the world, ranging from highly polluted Delhi and Beijing to moderately polluted London and Oslo. Greta Thunberg at WHO’s Pollution Pods exhibit. “If we can connect the climate crisis with air pollution, it is just so connected and we cannot solve one without solving the other,” said Thunberg. WHO has been leading research and policy synthesis on climate and health issues for nearly two decades. Now some of the largest humanitarian and health civil society organizations are speaking up more assertively. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) both issued statements just ahead of the Summit about the urgency of addressing climate change. The International Federation of the Red Cross report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, warned that by 2050 some 200 million people a year will be in need of humanitarian assistance due to climate related events, double today’s level. Costs of responding to humanitarian crises will balloon to USD$20 billion. The global health and humanitarian aid communities are facing a “climate emergency,” said the Executive Director of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, in another statement, issued on Thursday. Vital Strategies, a longtime health actor on tobacco control, NCDs, and traffic injuries has also become active in the climate space (see interview). And dedicated NGOs, such as Health Care without Harm, and the Global Climate and Health Alliance, have also appeared on the scene to address health workers about the urgent health impacts of climate change, as well as to advocate for reducing the climate footprint of the health sector, which is responsible for as much as 4.5% of climate emissions, according to a recent report. New Roadmap Provides 36 Solutions to Cut Climate Emissions 50% by 2030 Worldwide Among scientists, as well, there is a stronger note of activism, as reflected in reports such as the Exponential Roadmap. The report identifies a number of “tipping points” it says could accelerate transformation toward a more sustainable global economy, including: Low cost solar, wind, and battery technologies, which are on profitable, exponential trajectories that if sustained, will be enough to halve emissions from electricity generation by 2030; Electric vehicle growth, which has the potential to reach a 90% market share by 2030 if sustained, but only if strong policies support this direction; Growing social movements changing the public conversation in parallel with companies and cities stepping up climate action; Emerging political support for more ambitious targets, for example countries such as the UK, France, Norway and Sweden adopting laws to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier. Along with that, digital technology could support a rapid transformation of economic systems – although if it is not managed, digital transformation also could drive emissions higher, the report’s authors warn. Of the report, Figueres said, “I see all evidence that social and economic tipping points are aligning. We can now say the next decade has the potential to see the fastest economic transition in history. The 2019 Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for the necessary journey to net-zero emissions.” Manuel Pugal-Vidal, leader of the climate and energy practice at WWF, a partner of the report said in a statement, “Governments must introduce national targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 with targets to cut emissions 50% by 2030. Immediate removal of fossil-fuel subsidies is a priority. Yet policies must be equitable and fair or risk failure.” “Developed nations with significant historic emissions also have a responsibility to reduce emissions faster. Cities and states – not only countries – will also be important change makers,” he adds. More from HPW’s interview with Maria Neira, Christiana Figueres, and Michelle Bachelet: https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.45.40-PM-2.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.57.10-PM.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.53.47-PM.mp4 For more about the story of the “Pollution Pods” see here. Grace Ren also contributed to this story. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, Fletcher/HP-Watch. “We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Thousands “Walk The Talk” At Event To Raise Awareness For Universal Health Coverage 22/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY – Thousands of people attended a Sunday morning walk/run event here in Central Park to raise awareness for Universal Health Coverage, co-hosted by the World Health Organization and the City of New York. The “Walk the Talk: Healthcare for All Challenge” kicks off a week of high-level talks at the 74th United Nations General Assembly, including tomorrow’s long-anticipated High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as well as the UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit. Participants mill around Central Park at “Walk the Talk.” “Today we are walking for our own health. But we are also marching to demand health for all,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, at the opening of the event. The event brought together both New York locals, UN officials, and people from all around the world to commit to health and wellness on an individual and global level. Staff from UN offices around the world such as UNICEF, WHO’s Western Pacific Regional Office and Pan-American Health Organization attended the event, and many major global health organizations such as Vital Strategies also showed up to support. A number of world leaders also participated in the fun-run, including the President of Palau, Thomas Remengesau Jr., and Norway’s Minister of Health, Bent Høie. The event was positioned around the larger conversation underway this week at the UN regarding both UHC and action on climate change. Ricky Kej, Grammy-award winning musician, shares the stage with a multicultural ensemble at “Walk the Talk.” Grammy-winning artist and activist Ricky Kej performed at the closing ceremony, raising awareness on climate change and hearing loss in youth. WHO estimates that over 1 billion youth are at risk of hearing loss from unsafe listening devices. Other speakers reiterated the challenges to achieving universal health coverage. “We are not doing enough to safeguard the future of our children, not when there is very little being done when young people reach the age of 10,” said Zoleka Mandela, activist and granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, pointing to gaps in access in healthcare, and neglect of sexual and reproductive health, injuries, and non-communicable diseases on the adolescent health agenda. Zoleka Mandela, granddaughter of Nelson Mandela, calls for a Global Adolescent Summit. Barely 2% of current global health funding is targeted towards adolescent health. Overall, some 51-67% percent of the world’s population does not have access to universal health coverage, according to a new report released today by the World Health Organization. Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former director-general of the WHO and a founding member of the group of statesmen and stateswomen known as “The Elders”, pointed to the United States’ lack of publicly-funded healthcare and urged states to fulfill their responsibilities to “provide effective and comprehensive public health care to all citizens.” European Union Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis gave a rousing speech along similar lines, urging US participants to push for higher health coverage and “make this country great again.” Dr. Tedros ended the event by reiterating that universal health coverage is a “political issue.” “By walking today,” he said, “We are asking our world leaders to honor their commitment on September 2015 when they agreed to achieve universal health coverage for all by 2030.” Image Credits: Gabby Stern/WHO, Ricky Kej, G Ren/HP-Watch. Civil Society Takes Charge On Climate Action As Governments Waver 21/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Youth leaders from around the world clamored for more action on climate change Saturday at a first-ever United Nation’s Youth Climate Summit – even as the actual government commitments lined up for Monday’s formal meeting with heads of state appeared likely fall far short of making the dramatic changes that scientists say would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5° C. Youth activists and the Secretary-General of the UN give opening remarks at the Youth Climate Summit. Sources told Health Policy Watch that some 50 national commitments were due to be announced Monday at the UN Climate Summit. But these would not be sufficient to sharply reduce the pace of climate change that right now has the world heading for 3°C or higher temperatures by the end of the century. That, health experts have warned, would trigger an unprecedented spiral of threats to human health, food security, disease transmission and to the very survival of small island states and coastal communities. (Left to Right) Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC executive secretary, WHO’s Maria Neira, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. Against the dark scientific predictions, Saturday’s assembly was a further reflection of how civil society organizations of all stripes – from climate researchers to public health advocates, students and urban leaders– have been mobilizing to seize initiative where governments have so far failed. On Thursday, a consortium of scientists published The Exponential Roadmap, outlining 36 strategies that could slash greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 if they were scaled up rapidly. These 36 solutions – ranging from solar and wind to electric bikes, commercial shipping and reduced red meat consumption – could “stabilize earth’s temperatures and significantly reduce risks to societies” said the authors of the report by the Future Earth consortium, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. “This is now a race against time, but businesses and even entire industries have made many significant transitions in less than 10 years,” said report author Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of Future Earth, an international research programme, in a press release. Saturday’s Climate Youth Summit also came in the wake of Friday’s historic global climate strike that mobilized 4 million people worldwide, many from youth-led movements, who demanded more accountability from government and industry leaders. “I want the leaders of the world to respect the rights of future generations, respect the right to a habitable planet… We are not insurance policies, We are communities, we are human communities. Is it really too much to ask you to walk the talk?” Kamal Karishma Kumar, a young activist from the island of Fiji, a country threatened by rising sea levels, told the world leaders at the Youth Summit inside UN Headquarters. Youth participants also demanded greater accountability from industry representatives who were present at the Summit. One activist challenged Microsoft’s Chief Environmental Officer, Lucas Jappa, over recent business deals with fossil fuel companies. “If Microsoft is so committed to sustainability, why did Microsoft partner with Chevron and Schlumberger this week to accelerate oil extraction?… Do you care more about profit than you care about us?” she asked. Making new business deals with the fossil fuels industry is an issue that “the entire tech sector and everybody who is living in the world today, which is predicated upon an oil and gas economy, has to answer,” Microsoft’s Jappa responded. “It’s a conversation that we’re having inside the company and it’s one that I think you’ll be hearing more about, both from Microsoft and our peers in the broader tech sector…. Know that Microsoft will be engaging in this dialogue moving forward,” Jappa added. Monday’s Summit Portrayed as a “Beginning” not a “Milestone” The Youth Summit took place against a background of sober recognition that the level of commitment from global leaders moving into Monday’s high-level Climate Action Summit was likely to be muted. And leaders were busy recasting the Monday meeting as the beginning and not the end of the process. “We have 50 commitments, that is not negligible,” said Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “There is nothing in life that is black or white, everything is shades of grey and I am absolutely sure that this [summit] will take us to the next level,” Figueres, now a lead actor in Mission 2020, a partner organisation in the Exponential Roadmap, told Health Policy Watch in a brief interview. Figueres said she had been “inspired and called to account” by young people speaking out at events such as the Youth Summit, “They have said our generation has not done our job – nobody is exempt, everybody has to do something.” UN Secretary-General, António Guterres. The youth movement and leaders such as Greta Thunberg will be remembered as making “the biggest difference” in the climate movement, said Norway’s Environment and Climate Minister, Ola Elvestuen, at the UN meeting. Speaking at today’s Youth Summit event, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, sounded a note of hope. “When I started two years ago… I felt very discouraged in relation to the perspectives about climate action. We were already facing a climate emergency… At the same time, there was an apathy, there was a sense of difficulty in getting people to act.” Now, he said, public sentiment is finally turning around. But asked later by Health Policy Watch if he had “high hopes” that Monday would be a milestone, The Secretary General paused and said only “I have… hopes.” Health Mobilizing More Aggressively Recognizing that climate impacts people’s health can also help motivate climate action, said Thunberg upon a visit to a “Pollution Pods” exhibit on the UN lawn, sponsored by the World Health Organization. The traveling exhibit, by British artist Michael Pinsky, recreates the experience of pollution in five cities of the world, ranging from highly polluted Delhi and Beijing to moderately polluted London and Oslo. Greta Thunberg at WHO’s Pollution Pods exhibit. “If we can connect the climate crisis with air pollution, it is just so connected and we cannot solve one without solving the other,” said Thunberg. WHO has been leading research and policy synthesis on climate and health issues for nearly two decades. Now some of the largest humanitarian and health civil society organizations are speaking up more assertively. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) both issued statements just ahead of the Summit about the urgency of addressing climate change. The International Federation of the Red Cross report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, warned that by 2050 some 200 million people a year will be in need of humanitarian assistance due to climate related events, double today’s level. Costs of responding to humanitarian crises will balloon to USD$20 billion. The global health and humanitarian aid communities are facing a “climate emergency,” said the Executive Director of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, in another statement, issued on Thursday. Vital Strategies, a longtime health actor on tobacco control, NCDs, and traffic injuries has also become active in the climate space (see interview). And dedicated NGOs, such as Health Care without Harm, and the Global Climate and Health Alliance, have also appeared on the scene to address health workers about the urgent health impacts of climate change, as well as to advocate for reducing the climate footprint of the health sector, which is responsible for as much as 4.5% of climate emissions, according to a recent report. New Roadmap Provides 36 Solutions to Cut Climate Emissions 50% by 2030 Worldwide Among scientists, as well, there is a stronger note of activism, as reflected in reports such as the Exponential Roadmap. The report identifies a number of “tipping points” it says could accelerate transformation toward a more sustainable global economy, including: Low cost solar, wind, and battery technologies, which are on profitable, exponential trajectories that if sustained, will be enough to halve emissions from electricity generation by 2030; Electric vehicle growth, which has the potential to reach a 90% market share by 2030 if sustained, but only if strong policies support this direction; Growing social movements changing the public conversation in parallel with companies and cities stepping up climate action; Emerging political support for more ambitious targets, for example countries such as the UK, France, Norway and Sweden adopting laws to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier. Along with that, digital technology could support a rapid transformation of economic systems – although if it is not managed, digital transformation also could drive emissions higher, the report’s authors warn. Of the report, Figueres said, “I see all evidence that social and economic tipping points are aligning. We can now say the next decade has the potential to see the fastest economic transition in history. The 2019 Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for the necessary journey to net-zero emissions.” Manuel Pugal-Vidal, leader of the climate and energy practice at WWF, a partner of the report said in a statement, “Governments must introduce national targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 with targets to cut emissions 50% by 2030. Immediate removal of fossil-fuel subsidies is a priority. Yet policies must be equitable and fair or risk failure.” “Developed nations with significant historic emissions also have a responsibility to reduce emissions faster. Cities and states – not only countries – will also be important change makers,” he adds. More from HPW’s interview with Maria Neira, Christiana Figueres, and Michelle Bachelet: https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.45.40-PM-2.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.57.10-PM.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.53.47-PM.mp4 For more about the story of the “Pollution Pods” see here. Grace Ren also contributed to this story. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, Fletcher/HP-Watch. “We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Civil Society Takes Charge On Climate Action As Governments Waver 21/09/2019 Elaine Ruth Fletcher NEW YORK CITY – Youth leaders from around the world clamored for more action on climate change Saturday at a first-ever United Nation’s Youth Climate Summit – even as the actual government commitments lined up for Monday’s formal meeting with heads of state appeared likely fall far short of making the dramatic changes that scientists say would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5° C. Youth activists and the Secretary-General of the UN give opening remarks at the Youth Climate Summit. Sources told Health Policy Watch that some 50 national commitments were due to be announced Monday at the UN Climate Summit. But these would not be sufficient to sharply reduce the pace of climate change that right now has the world heading for 3°C or higher temperatures by the end of the century. That, health experts have warned, would trigger an unprecedented spiral of threats to human health, food security, disease transmission and to the very survival of small island states and coastal communities. (Left to Right) Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC executive secretary, WHO’s Maria Neira, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. Against the dark scientific predictions, Saturday’s assembly was a further reflection of how civil society organizations of all stripes – from climate researchers to public health advocates, students and urban leaders– have been mobilizing to seize initiative where governments have so far failed. On Thursday, a consortium of scientists published The Exponential Roadmap, outlining 36 strategies that could slash greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 if they were scaled up rapidly. These 36 solutions – ranging from solar and wind to electric bikes, commercial shipping and reduced red meat consumption – could “stabilize earth’s temperatures and significantly reduce risks to societies” said the authors of the report by the Future Earth consortium, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. “This is now a race against time, but businesses and even entire industries have made many significant transitions in less than 10 years,” said report author Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of Future Earth, an international research programme, in a press release. Saturday’s Climate Youth Summit also came in the wake of Friday’s historic global climate strike that mobilized 4 million people worldwide, many from youth-led movements, who demanded more accountability from government and industry leaders. “I want the leaders of the world to respect the rights of future generations, respect the right to a habitable planet… We are not insurance policies, We are communities, we are human communities. Is it really too much to ask you to walk the talk?” Kamal Karishma Kumar, a young activist from the island of Fiji, a country threatened by rising sea levels, told the world leaders at the Youth Summit inside UN Headquarters. Youth participants also demanded greater accountability from industry representatives who were present at the Summit. One activist challenged Microsoft’s Chief Environmental Officer, Lucas Jappa, over recent business deals with fossil fuel companies. “If Microsoft is so committed to sustainability, why did Microsoft partner with Chevron and Schlumberger this week to accelerate oil extraction?… Do you care more about profit than you care about us?” she asked. Making new business deals with the fossil fuels industry is an issue that “the entire tech sector and everybody who is living in the world today, which is predicated upon an oil and gas economy, has to answer,” Microsoft’s Jappa responded. “It’s a conversation that we’re having inside the company and it’s one that I think you’ll be hearing more about, both from Microsoft and our peers in the broader tech sector…. Know that Microsoft will be engaging in this dialogue moving forward,” Jappa added. Monday’s Summit Portrayed as a “Beginning” not a “Milestone” The Youth Summit took place against a background of sober recognition that the level of commitment from global leaders moving into Monday’s high-level Climate Action Summit was likely to be muted. And leaders were busy recasting the Monday meeting as the beginning and not the end of the process. “We have 50 commitments, that is not negligible,” said Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “There is nothing in life that is black or white, everything is shades of grey and I am absolutely sure that this [summit] will take us to the next level,” Figueres, now a lead actor in Mission 2020, a partner organisation in the Exponential Roadmap, told Health Policy Watch in a brief interview. Figueres said she had been “inspired and called to account” by young people speaking out at events such as the Youth Summit, “They have said our generation has not done our job – nobody is exempt, everybody has to do something.” UN Secretary-General, António Guterres. The youth movement and leaders such as Greta Thunberg will be remembered as making “the biggest difference” in the climate movement, said Norway’s Environment and Climate Minister, Ola Elvestuen, at the UN meeting. Speaking at today’s Youth Summit event, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, sounded a note of hope. “When I started two years ago… I felt very discouraged in relation to the perspectives about climate action. We were already facing a climate emergency… At the same time, there was an apathy, there was a sense of difficulty in getting people to act.” Now, he said, public sentiment is finally turning around. But asked later by Health Policy Watch if he had “high hopes” that Monday would be a milestone, The Secretary General paused and said only “I have… hopes.” Health Mobilizing More Aggressively Recognizing that climate impacts people’s health can also help motivate climate action, said Thunberg upon a visit to a “Pollution Pods” exhibit on the UN lawn, sponsored by the World Health Organization. The traveling exhibit, by British artist Michael Pinsky, recreates the experience of pollution in five cities of the world, ranging from highly polluted Delhi and Beijing to moderately polluted London and Oslo. Greta Thunberg at WHO’s Pollution Pods exhibit. “If we can connect the climate crisis with air pollution, it is just so connected and we cannot solve one without solving the other,” said Thunberg. WHO has been leading research and policy synthesis on climate and health issues for nearly two decades. Now some of the largest humanitarian and health civil society organizations are speaking up more assertively. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) both issued statements just ahead of the Summit about the urgency of addressing climate change. The International Federation of the Red Cross report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, warned that by 2050 some 200 million people a year will be in need of humanitarian assistance due to climate related events, double today’s level. Costs of responding to humanitarian crises will balloon to USD$20 billion. The global health and humanitarian aid communities are facing a “climate emergency,” said the Executive Director of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, in another statement, issued on Thursday. Vital Strategies, a longtime health actor on tobacco control, NCDs, and traffic injuries has also become active in the climate space (see interview). And dedicated NGOs, such as Health Care without Harm, and the Global Climate and Health Alliance, have also appeared on the scene to address health workers about the urgent health impacts of climate change, as well as to advocate for reducing the climate footprint of the health sector, which is responsible for as much as 4.5% of climate emissions, according to a recent report. New Roadmap Provides 36 Solutions to Cut Climate Emissions 50% by 2030 Worldwide Among scientists, as well, there is a stronger note of activism, as reflected in reports such as the Exponential Roadmap. The report identifies a number of “tipping points” it says could accelerate transformation toward a more sustainable global economy, including: Low cost solar, wind, and battery technologies, which are on profitable, exponential trajectories that if sustained, will be enough to halve emissions from electricity generation by 2030; Electric vehicle growth, which has the potential to reach a 90% market share by 2030 if sustained, but only if strong policies support this direction; Growing social movements changing the public conversation in parallel with companies and cities stepping up climate action; Emerging political support for more ambitious targets, for example countries such as the UK, France, Norway and Sweden adopting laws to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier. Along with that, digital technology could support a rapid transformation of economic systems – although if it is not managed, digital transformation also could drive emissions higher, the report’s authors warn. Of the report, Figueres said, “I see all evidence that social and economic tipping points are aligning. We can now say the next decade has the potential to see the fastest economic transition in history. The 2019 Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for the necessary journey to net-zero emissions.” Manuel Pugal-Vidal, leader of the climate and energy practice at WWF, a partner of the report said in a statement, “Governments must introduce national targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 with targets to cut emissions 50% by 2030. Immediate removal of fossil-fuel subsidies is a priority. Yet policies must be equitable and fair or risk failure.” “Developed nations with significant historic emissions also have a responsibility to reduce emissions faster. Cities and states – not only countries – will also be important change makers,” he adds. More from HPW’s interview with Maria Neira, Christiana Figueres, and Michelle Bachelet: https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.45.40-PM-2.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.57.10-PM.mp4 https://www.healthpolicy-watch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/WhatsApp-Video-2019-09-21-at-6.53.47-PM.mp4 For more about the story of the “Pollution Pods” see here. Grace Ren also contributed to this story. This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. Image Credits: UN Photo/Kim Haughton, Fletcher/HP-Watch. “We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
“We Are Here To Fight For Our Lives” – Thousands Flood Streets To Demand Climate Action 20/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK CITY (September 20, 2019) – Thousands of people have flooded streets here today as part of a worldwide movement to demand climate action. 4 million people in over 150 countries around the world took to the streets in a global Climate Strike. The New York Climate Strike is one of over a thousand registered strikes in the US alone. Students and adults alike walked out of schools and workplaces to join the strike today, many with institutional support. Over 1500 employees at companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, have pledged to walk out to join the protest. Employees from major NGOs such as Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have also planned walk-outs, sources told Health Policy Watch. Students and adults at the New York City Climate Strike In a show of institutional support, all public New York City schools announced that they will excuse student absences due to the strike last week on Twitter. At Foley Park, the venue for the Climate Strike in New York City, the air is humming with energy, and the most prominent thing about the crowd is how young it is. High-school and middle school students make up a majority of the people chanting for change, and the presence of whole families is felt as parents walk hand-in-hand with their kids and strike for their children’s futures. Health Policy Watch asked some people why they were striking today. Here is what they said: Valerie, architectural designer, holds her list of climate action demands. “I’m striking because…we don’t have much time left. I’m only 23, so I want my kids to enjoy what I enjoyed when I was younger, and I think there is no other way to do it other than to demand accountability for the actions that were made, and try to solve them right now because we have all the tools and resources. People just need to start taking action.” – Valerie, Architectural Designer. The Schoor family holds their Climate Strike signs. “For my husband and I, one of the reasons why we’re striking is for our daughter. We want to make sure she has a healthy place to live, or a place to live at all. And with climate change going on, we know there are a lot of issues with more people having breathing problems, different cancers, and we just really want to make sure our daughter and our grandchildren have a safe place to live.”- Schoor Family. Student from East York Middle School of Excellence in Brooklyn, New York, holds a sign “Climate justice and social justice flower from the same seed. So we know that people of color are disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, so it’s important that we hear people of color’s voices, and to protect our planet.” – Ms. Sweet, teacher at East York Middle School of Excellence, on why her school is supporting their students to attend the Climate Strike. “We are here to fight for climate change. We are not here to skip school or skip work, we are not here to watch. We are here to fight for our lives, we are here so climate change will not kill us. [The government] will not listen to our heeding, or listen to scientists either, so now we come here to fight.”- Stephan, student at East York Middle School of Excellence. Leo, age 7, has been protesting on the stairs of New York City Hall since December 2018 “It’s not good for the earth, every time it makes another thing, it pollutes the air more. [Climate change is important for health] because we won’t get to live a long life, and I want everyone to have a long life.”- Leo, 7 years old. Justin and Andrei, Artists, hand out free signs they created to strike participants. “We need to bridge ourselves back into the natural world, we’re very disconnected from the natural world so I think this movement is important. I worked with Greta Thunberg… and so I support all these projects she’s doing, and all the students and adults who are out here”- Justin Brice Guariglia, Artist and Climate Activist. “Today’s the day we decided to gather around the world, it’s the most important issue of our day. Everything comes together with climate change – income inequality, changing economies, the loss and gain of jobs, there is absolutely no area of civic life that is not touched by the disaster ahead if we don’t do something.” – Andrei Codrescu, Romanian-American Poet. Today’s global Climate Strike movement began with school walk-outs organized by students around the world, inspired by Greta Thunberg’s first strike in 2018. Greta, along with youth climate leaders around the world, have been invited to New York to attend meetings during the 74th United Nations General Assembly. The strikes come just one day before the Youth Climate Summit hosted by the United Nations, where over 100 youth leaders in the climate movement have been invited to participate in discussion around climate action, and three days before the planned Climate Action Summit, where UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be calling on countries to share concrete plans for tackling the so-called “climate-crisis.” This story was published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story, co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. September 21 2019 – This story was updated to reflect new attendance numbers for the global climate strike. Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy
Over Half of New Cancer Drugs Approved Based On Potentially Biased Evidence, New Study Finds 19/09/2019 Grace Ren NEW YORK – Over half of new cancer drug approvals granted by European authorities between 2014-2016 may have been made based on evidence from biased clinical trials, according to a new study published in The BMJ. The study, led by Dr. Christopher Booth, professor of oncology from Queens University Cancer Research Institute, raises serious questions about the quality and strength of evidence used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve new cancer drugs. Half of the 32 new drug approvals relied on evidence from trials that were “at high risk of bias,” according to the study. And an additional 7 of those used results from at least one randomised-control trial (RCT) that was at “low risk” of bias, researchers found in the study, which was partially funded by a civil society group that has protested cancer drug prices and championed access to medicines issues. A nurse injects medicine into a cancer patient. Photo: WHO/ G. Reboux Only 7 of the new drugs were approved based on trials that actually measured improvements in survival or quality of life outcomes. Noting that some bias in trials is unavoidable due to the complexity of cancer, the authors were concerned that a number of studies did not give clear reasons for why they may have excluded data from their analyses. While the authors note that the results may not be generalizable to all new drug approvals, civil society groups were quick to say that the paper strengthens the case for revamping the drug approval regulatory process to ensure that new medicines brought to market are indeed effective. “…Many newly marketed medicines bring negligible or non-existent improvements to survival rates and quality of life for patients, while becoming ever-more unaffordable to already stretched health systems,” Jaume Vidal, senior policy advisor at Health Action International, the group that partially funded the study in a press release. “Regulators must take on the findings to help ensure new medicines on the market are there for the benefit of the patient and society and not pharmaceutical companies and shareholders.” The World Health Organization tends to follow the lead of regulatory agencies such as the EMA or the US Drug and Food Administration in the consideration of new medicines for “pre-qualification” as drugs that developing countries could obtain at negotiated prices. WHO approval, in turn, may be interpreted as a green light to developing countries to begin reviewing and registering new therapies nationally. Image Credits: WHO/G. Reboux. Posts navigation Older postsNewer posts